Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🇺🇸 ELECTION INTERFERENCE EXPOSED A foreign government is now spending $75 million to influence U.S. voters — and the media calls it diplomacy. Doug Ford’s boast that he’ll flood Republican districts with ads is not outreach; it’s meddling. Imagine if President Trump bought ads in Ottawa or Toronto —...

15,816 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The recent events surrounding Michael Ma, a Canadian politician who crossed the floor from the Conservative Party to the Liberal Party, have raised significant concerns about the integrity of Canadian democracy and the potential for foreign interference. Ma's participation in the 40th Anniversary Celebration of the Confederation of Toronto Chinese Canadian Organizations (CTCCO), an event marked by overt symbols of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) such as red scarves and the singing of the Chinese national anthem, suggests a troubling alignment with foreign interests that contradicts his role as a Canadian parliamentarian. This event, which took place on November 30, 2025, is not an isolated incident but part of a broader pattern of activities linked to the CCP's United Front Work Department, an entity known for its efforts to influence overseas Chinese communities and, by extension, the politics of host countries. The timing of Ma's defection, reportedly planned a week in advance, coinciding with the release of this video, fuels suspicion that his move was not merely a change of political allegiance but possibly a calculated maneuver influenced by external pressures or incentives. The CTCCO, despite its stated purpose of uniting Chinese Canadians, has been implicated in activities that align with CCP interests, including alleged interference in Canadian elections. Reports from credible sources, such as The Globe and Mail and the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP), have documented how such organizations serve as conduits for foreign influence, often operating in a "grey zone" where their actions are not illegal but become problematic when they involve hidden foreign state involvement or funding. The presence of Ma at this event, therefore, raises questions about whether he was aware of, or complicit in, these activities, and whether his defection was part of a larger strategy to undermine Canadian political processes. Canadians should be deeply suspicious and skeptical of these developments because they threaten the very foundation of democratic integrity. The idea that a politician could be a plant, mole, or spy, sending sensitive information back to the CCP about the inner workings of the Conservative Party, is not merely speculative but is supported by a pattern of behavior and associations that cannot be ignored. The CCP's history of espionage and influence operations, as detailed in various intelligence reports, includes targeting public officials across all levels of government, and the Canadian government has been criticized for being slow to react to these threats. Ma's actions, therefore, must be viewed within this context, where the potential for him to have been an agent of foreign influence, gathering and relaying information, cannot be dismissed lightly. The stench of impropriety is palpable when considering the broader implications of Ma's defection and the Liberal Party's acceptance of him despite these red flags. The Liberal Party's move to within one seat of a majority government through Ma's defection benefits them politically, but it also raises questions about whether they were aware of his background and chose to overlook it for strategic gain. This scenario suggests a disturbing possibility that foreign interference could be manipulating Canadian politics at the highest levels, with politicians potentially acting as unwitting or willing pawns in a game of geopolitical chess. The lack of transparency and the hurried nature of Ma's defection, combined with the video evidence of his participation in a CCP-aligned event, do not add up to a narrative of coincidence but rather one of calculated coordination.

Vote Canada

35,439 views • 8 months ago

🚨 BREAKING: Secretary of State of Marco Rubio has just stunned the world, launching a plan to DESTROY the International Criminal Court (ICC) threats to American sovereignty Marco just confirmed it: NO GLOBALIST JUDGE HAS ANY AUTHORITY OVER AMERICANS, "international law" has NO EFFECT in the USA 🇺🇸 "As we speak, the ICC and its friends are waging a war against our country, not with bullets or missiles, but with statutes and compacts and the force of so-called international law!" "They believe that they should be in charge of YOUR laws, of YOUR country, YOUR life, and they don't care whether or not you agree." "Halfway across the world, there's an institution that calls itself the International Criminal Court. Maybe you've heard of it, maybe you haven't. The chances are you don't know the names of its judges, of its prosecutors, or its president!" "It was a global tribunal staffed by unelected globalist bureaucrats who claimed their power is almost unlimited. The danger of this global court has only continued to grow." "It threatens every aspect of our political and legal system. Border Patrol agents removing violent criminals from our country, American Marines risking their lives to defend our homeland, prosecutors working to dismantle terrorist plots to attack and kill Americans." "If we stand idle, all of them would be at the mercy of foreign judges thousands of miles away facing the constant risk of prosecution and even imprisonment for the so-called crime of defending their own country." "The American people never agreed to any of this, and they never will. Read the words of our Declaration of Independence. We fought a revolution against a foreign power transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses!" "Independence is our birthright. We will never let foreign bureaucrats take that away from us. This administration will not sit by as the ICC and its allies seek to threaten our people." "If they believe they can deprive us of our sovereignty, we will teach them the full meaning of American resolve." BASED.

Eric Daugherty

2,756,010 views • 1 month ago

The Israel Hoax just dropped. Presidential candidate Donald Trump is being investigated for the alleged "massive crime" of making an unsanctioned phone call to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. As reported by Axios, the former president spoke on the phone with Netanyahu to discuss the Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal, citing two U.S. sources who were briefed on the call. Donald Trump met with Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago in July. Netanyahu also met with President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris during his visit. According to Newsweek, if Trump did make the call, he would "potentially be breaking the law as the Logan Act, enacted in 1799," which "prohibits unauthorized private citizens from negotiating with foreign governments on behalf of the U.S." American Muckrakers filed a request with the Justice department and the State Department over Donald Trump's alleged call. Donald Trump's reported conversation with Netanyahu would be far from unusual, particularly for a former president or an ex-diplomat. In March 2024, former President Barack Obama paid a "surprise visit" to Downing Street in the United Kingdom to meet with then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. A British official told The Hill that Obama and Sunak discussed a variety of issues, including international affairs and artificial intelligence (AI). During the Trump administration, former Secretary of State John Kerry met with the Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif in meetings that critics say were intended to undermine sitting President Trump.

Kyle Becker

247,969 views • 2 years ago

What a resounding condemnation by (368-7) of the unhinging of the democratic process in Pakistan by the US Congress. A positive push in the right direction, along the lines of our own constitution, for democracy, rule of law, civilian control over our armed forces (not vice versa), personal freedoms, etc. Resolution 901 states in essence that: "The people of Pakistan deserve the respect of their government, the rule of law, free and fair elections and civilian command and control of their armed forces ...... "Whereas the Constitution of Pakistan states that ‘‘the Federal Government shall have control and command of the Armed Forces’’, and the oath taken by members of the Armed Forces swears they will ‘‘uphold the Constitution’’ and ‘‘not engage in any political activities; "Whereas an essential safeguard of democracy is civilian command and control of apolitical military and security forces; ........ "Urges the Government of Pakistan to uphold democratic and electoral institutions, human rights, and the rule of law, and respect the fundamental guarantees of due process, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, and freedom of speech of the people of Pakistan; "Condemns attempts to suppress the people of Pakistan’s participation in their democracy through harassment, intimidation, violence, arbitrary detention, restrictions on access to the internet and telecommunications, or any violation of their human, civil, or political rights; "Condemns any effort to subvert the political, electoral, or judicial processes of Pakistan; and "Urges the full and independent investigation of claims of interference or irregularities in Pakistan’s February 2024 election".

Dr. Arif Alvi

108,020 views • 2 years ago