Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Eligible receiver analysis

1,510,399 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von Benjamin Solak
Benjamin Solakvor 2 Jahren

St. Brown (top of screen) is on the LOS. He looks a little off the LOS (I thought he was at first) but I'm assuming he checked with the side judge, as all receivers do, to ensure the side judge considered him on the LOS

Profilbild von Benjamin Solak
Benjamin Solakvor 2 Jahren

Absolutely hilarious bit from Brad Allen: "it was so weird! 70 reported as eligible, but lined up in the position of an ineligible players. And 68 didn't report, but lined up as an eligible receiver. Crazy! So weird that the Lions would do that. Anyway..."

Profilbild von David Kern
David Kernvor 2 Jahren

thing is, Ben, if Allen tells the D that Decker is eligible they defend it differently.

Profilbild von Jason Wallington
Jason Wallingtonvor 2 Jahren

@Ezdoesit27 So @Lions did such a good job in trying to fool @dallascowboys that they actually fooled the @NFLOfficiating too?

Profilbild von Mike Golic
Mike Golicvor 2 Jahren

Trying to sneak it in makes no sense, the ref has to go tell the defense what number is eligible. So they are going to know who is eligible

Profilbild von AO
AOvor 2 Jahren

Spend time reviewing the fake tripping call

Profilbild von 𝓛𝓾𝓬𝓴☘️⚡️
𝓛𝓾𝓬𝓴☘️⚡️vor 2 Jahren

Did no one on the entire Lions team or staff hear the ref call 70 the eligible receiver to the entire stadium??? Feel like the could’ve corrected him after he announced it to the stadium but no they went on with the play KNOWING the refs didn’t know 68 was eligible their fault

Profilbild von Jugo Iloski
Jugo Iloskivor 2 Jahren

The play design was orchestrated to a tee & officials robbed them

Profilbild von jremani
jremanivor 2 Jahren

This guy says the one dude doesn’t come “close” to the official when he jogs right toward him and the two other dudes instead of the line where he is going to play. The Lions, in a crucial moment in the season, tried chicanery instead of playing it straight and got burned.

Profilbild von Lawrence Flynn
Lawrence Flynnvor 2 Jahren

Did u see John Parry’s, the @espn rules analyst, breakdown the call on sportscenter? It was laughable. SVP, to his credit, pushed back pretty hard. The @NFL and the owners just don’t care about poor officiating. Controversial/bad calls are basically a weekly occurrence now.

Ähnliche Videos

Football is the most complex sport that has many rules that the majority of fans (or sometimes even commentators) don't fully understand. I've seen a lot of misinformation and confusion last night and today regarding what an eligible receiver is and what intentional grounding is. What is intentional grounding? (see the 1st picture) If the ball is thrown to the vicinity of an eligible receiver, there is no penalty. So the next question is what makes someone an eligible receiver? (see the 2nd picture): - Anyone off the Line of Scrimmage - The farthest man to the left of the players on the L.O.S. - The farthest man to the right of the players on the L.O.S. The offense must have at least 7 players on the L.O.S. (so they cannot have more than 4 off the L.O.S.). Therefore, there are usually 6 eligible receivers in any given play (the 4 players off the L.O.S. plus the farthest man on the L.O.S. to the left and to the right). Yes, the Quarterback is an eligible player. On the Lions backed up play, Goff throws the ball toward (and in the vicinity of) two eligible players. Debate all you want about his Tight End being in the vicinity, but his RB is right in front of him and the ball almost hits him. A player running a route or blocking has absolutely nothing to do with whether he's eligible or not. There is clearly no Grounding on that play. In the 3rd Quarter, the Vikings get called for Grounding simply because there's no eligible player within 10 yards of where the ball lands. These are pretty clear cut plays.

Connor Stalions

93,013 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr