Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Elitepain Classics! EliteClub: 21th Case #bdsm #bound #flogger #crop #clips #punishment #pain #pornstar

Mood Universe

73,533 subscribers

251,909 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #bdsm #bound #flogger #crop #clips #punishment #pain #pornstar

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Drew Kramer Starship Troopers: "It' Helps, I Know" - Whipping Scene • #armpit #armpits #armpithair #axilas #BDSM #gay #hairyarmpits #hairypits #humiliation #pain #pits #punishment #MakeMenMasculineAgain #muscle #muscleman #sadism #sixpack #sovaco #subaco #suvaco #stinky #sweaty #whipping

Sensitive content

Drew Kramer Starship Troopers: "It' Helps, I Know" - Whipping Scene • #armpit #armpits #armpithair #axilas #BDSM #gay #hairyarmpits #hairypits #humiliation #pain #pits #punishment #MakeMenMasculineAgain #muscle #muscleman #sadism #sixpack #sovaco #subaco #suvaco #stinky #sweaty #whipping

LEFT AND RIGHT ARMPITS (17,5K)

13,169 views • 1 year ago

This is a textbook case of systematic administrative fraud. A high-level, time-bound departmental inquiry must be ordered, and if the allegations are proven, exemplary punishment should be awarded and both officers dismissed from service. This is not just a fraud on the government, but a betrayal of the people of this country. This is precisely why government institutions have lost credibility in the eyes of the public.

This is a textbook case of systematic administrative fraud. A high-level, time-bound departmental inquiry must be ordered, and if the allegations are proven, exemplary punishment should be awarded and both officers dismissed from service. This is not just a fraud on the government, but a betrayal of the people of this country. This is precisely why government institutions have lost credibility in the eyes of the public.

Shesh Paul Vaid

257,871 views • 8 months ago

Afroman Day 2: Deputy claims Afroman singing about sleeping with his wife has caused him “tremendous pain” as grounds for defamation. Day 2 of the Afroman defamation case has begun, and Randolph L. Walters, Jr. testified that Afroman singing about sleeping with his wife caused him “tremendous pain.” Walters Jr. also stated that being labeled a “thief” has hurt his reputation. So far, all the deputies have claimed they do not believe everything they hear or see on the internet and that they have all been called names unrelated to Afroman’s songs. So many good clips 🤣

Afroman Day 2: Deputy claims Afroman singing about sleeping with his wife has caused him “tremendous pain” as grounds for defamation. Day 2 of the Afroman defamation case has begun, and Randolph L. Walters, Jr. testified that Afroman singing about sleeping with his wife caused him “tremendous pain.” Walters Jr. also stated that being labeled a “thief” has hurt his reputation. So far, all the deputies have claimed they do not believe everything they hear or see on the internet and that they have all been called names unrelated to Afroman’s songs. So many good clips 🤣

The Facts Dude 🤙🏽

7,792,686 views • 5 months ago

Xana Kernodle’s sister Jazzmin to Bryan Kohberger: “I believe in a God whose justice is not bound by this courtroom. I find peace knowing that judgment ultimately belongs to Him. For your sake, I hope one day you feel the full weight of what you did. I hope you take accountability. I hope you truly experience the guilt and you surrender your soul to Jesus Christ because no punishment on this Earth can ever compare to the isolation and pain of eternal separation from God...I will live in her honor, fight to be the best kind of woman and someone she's proud of, to make sure the world never forgets who she was. Xana’s story doesn't end with what was taken from her. It lives through the love she gave, the people she touched, and the legacy her family will protect. Her light still shines and her voice will echo louder than this pain. You didn't take that from us and you never will.”

Xana Kernodle’s sister Jazzmin to Bryan Kohberger: “I believe in a God whose justice is not bound by this courtroom. I find peace knowing that judgment ultimately belongs to Him. For your sake, I hope one day you feel the full weight of what you did. I hope you take accountability. I hope you truly experience the guilt and you surrender your soul to Jesus Christ because no punishment on this Earth can ever compare to the isolation and pain of eternal separation from God...I will live in her honor, fight to be the best kind of woman and someone she's proud of, to make sure the world never forgets who she was. Xana’s story doesn't end with what was taken from her. It lives through the love she gave, the people she touched, and the legacy her family will protect. Her light still shines and her voice will echo louder than this pain. You didn't take that from us and you never will.”

Curtis Houck

150,849 views • 1 year ago

🇬🇧 MOTHER OF 4 BEATEN UP, THEN CONVICTED OF HATE CRIME FOR TEXTING A SLUR A UK woman who says she was beaten so badly she had to be hospitalized has now been convicted - not for the assault, but for what she texted about it. Elizabeth Kinney, a care worker and mother of 4, sent a string of angry messages after being attacked by a man she knew. In the texts she also called him a “f****t”, and although she claimed it was a “thoughtless rant” during a moment of pain and stress, she’s now been convicted of a hate crime. The court gave her an “uplifted” sentence for what magistrates called “homophobic content,” despite no one being arrested over the assault itself. The case highlights a growing imbalance in what’s considered prosecutable speech. Tucker Carlson weighed in, arguing the story shows you can be beaten and still face harsher punishment than your attacker - if you say the wrong thing after. Her sentence includes community service, rehab days, and over £350 in fines. Meanwhile, the man she accused of assaulting her remains uncharged. Free speech? Justice? Depends on what you text. Source: Daily Mail, Tucker Carlson

🇬🇧 MOTHER OF 4 BEATEN UP, THEN CONVICTED OF HATE CRIME FOR TEXTING A SLUR A UK woman who says she was beaten so badly she had to be hospitalized has now been convicted - not for the assault, but for what she texted about it. Elizabeth Kinney, a care worker and mother of 4, sent a string of angry messages after being attacked by a man she knew. In the texts she also called him a “f****t”, and although she claimed it was a “thoughtless rant” during a moment of pain and stress, she’s now been convicted of a hate crime. The court gave her an “uplifted” sentence for what magistrates called “homophobic content,” despite no one being arrested over the assault itself. The case highlights a growing imbalance in what’s considered prosecutable speech. Tucker Carlson weighed in, arguing the story shows you can be beaten and still face harsher punishment than your attacker - if you say the wrong thing after. Her sentence includes community service, rehab days, and over £350 in fines. Meanwhile, the man she accused of assaulting her remains uncharged. Free speech? Justice? Depends on what you text. Source: Daily Mail, Tucker Carlson

Mario Nawfal

532,919 views • 8 months ago

VIDEO | Nanded, Maharashtra: A 21-year-old woman 'marries' boyfriend’s corpse after his alleged murder by her family. Videos of Aanchal Mamidwar performing the ritual at the deceased youth’s home, and demanding that her family members be hanged for the killing, have gone viral on social media. Speaking to PTI, Aanchal says, "I was in a relationship with Saksham (the deceased) for three years. My family did not accept it because he is a ‘Jai Bhim’ follower, that’s all. My family had assured him that they would get us married. They had given me the same assurance. So that day, before Sakhyam was killed, around 11 to 12 in the morning (I’m not sure of the exact time), my younger brother, Himesh Mamidwar, took me to the Itwara Police Station. There, he told me to file a case against Saksham. I refused in front of everyone. Then the two policemen there - Dheeraj Komulwar and Mahi Dasarwar, provoked him. They said, ‘You came here after beating him? Instead of doing this, it’s better that you deal with the guy your sister is involved with…" When asked about her demands, she says, "My only wish is that just as my Saksham died in pain, they should also face the same kind of death. So please give them the harshest possible punishment." (Full video available on PTI Videos –

VIDEO | Nanded, Maharashtra: A 21-year-old woman 'marries' boyfriend’s corpse after his alleged murder by her family. Videos of Aanchal Mamidwar performing the ritual at the deceased youth’s home, and demanding that her family members be hanged for the killing, have gone viral on social media. Speaking to PTI, Aanchal says, "I was in a relationship with Saksham (the deceased) for three years. My family did not accept it because he is a ‘Jai Bhim’ follower, that’s all. My family had assured him that they would get us married. They had given me the same assurance. So that day, before Sakhyam was killed, around 11 to 12 in the morning (I’m not sure of the exact time), my younger brother, Himesh Mamidwar, took me to the Itwara Police Station. There, he told me to file a case against Saksham. I refused in front of everyone. Then the two policemen there - Dheeraj Komulwar and Mahi Dasarwar, provoked him. They said, ‘You came here after beating him? Instead of doing this, it’s better that you deal with the guy your sister is involved with…" When asked about her demands, she says, "My only wish is that just as my Saksham died in pain, they should also face the same kind of death. So please give them the harshest possible punishment." (Full video available on PTI Videos –

Press Trust of India

293,525 views • 9 months ago

‼️COVER UP: FBI Surveillance Video Just DROPPED—Secret Service Agent CAUGHT Watching Shooter Ditch Coat & Ready Weapon… Then Just WALKS Away 👀 I just analyzed the "newly released" FBI surveillance footage of Cole Thomas Allen at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, and something is NOT adding up. We are being gaslit by the mainstream media, and I have the receipts to prove it. 🚩THE TWO MASSIVE RED FLAGS🚩 1⃣ First lets look at the first 16 seconds of the raw footage. A Secret Service agent—K9 in hand—follows Allen directly to a storage room. Allen walks in casually in a trench coat. The agent stands in the doorway, eyes locked on him for 10 full seconds. During that window, Allen is ditching the coat and readying his weapon. The second the agent turns to walk away, Allen bursts out and rushes the metal detectors. How does a trained agent miss a man readying a firearm three feet in front of him? Is this incompetence, or collusion? 2⃣ Secondly Every single major network—Fox, CNN, MSNBC—is playing the same 10-second loop of Allen running through the lobby with the gun. They’ve scrubbed the first 16 seconds. They don’t want you to see the agent standing there. They don’t want you to ask why he wasn't stopped before he ever reached the lobby. Why is the media protecting the narrative that this was a "security breach" instead of showing the full video that suggests a security escort?🤔 Was this SS Agent colluding with the suspect or part of a larger conspiracy? 😮 We deserve transparency, not edited clips. We’ve seen this playbook before with the Charlie Kirk case—crop the video, control the story. Not this time. What do you see in the footage? Let me know in the comments. We need to make this go viral. 👇

‼️COVER UP: FBI Surveillance Video Just DROPPED—Secret Service Agent CAUGHT Watching Shooter Ditch Coat & Ready Weapon… Then Just WALKS Away 👀 I just analyzed the "newly released" FBI surveillance footage of Cole Thomas Allen at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, and something is NOT adding up. We are being gaslit by the mainstream media, and I have the receipts to prove it. 🚩THE TWO MASSIVE RED FLAGS🚩 1⃣ First lets look at the first 16 seconds of the raw footage. A Secret Service agent—K9 in hand—follows Allen directly to a storage room. Allen walks in casually in a trench coat. The agent stands in the doorway, eyes locked on him for 10 full seconds. During that window, Allen is ditching the coat and readying his weapon. The second the agent turns to walk away, Allen bursts out and rushes the metal detectors. How does a trained agent miss a man readying a firearm three feet in front of him? Is this incompetence, or collusion? 2⃣ Secondly Every single major network—Fox, CNN, MSNBC—is playing the same 10-second loop of Allen running through the lobby with the gun. They’ve scrubbed the first 16 seconds. They don’t want you to see the agent standing there. They don’t want you to ask why he wasn't stopped before he ever reached the lobby. Why is the media protecting the narrative that this was a "security breach" instead of showing the full video that suggests a security escort?🤔 Was this SS Agent colluding with the suspect or part of a larger conspiracy? 😮 We deserve transparency, not edited clips. We’ve seen this playbook before with the Charlie Kirk case—crop the video, control the story. Not this time. What do you see in the footage? Let me know in the comments. We need to make this go viral. 👇

Project Constitution

79,317 views • 4 months ago

Let alone Women's Safety, Mamata Banerjee's inept Administration can't even protect an elephant, that too after remaining complicit while Hon'ble Supreme Court of India's Order was being violated. A pregnant elephant gets murdered by 'Hula party' (squads comprising people, armed with searchlights, flaming torches and crackers, deployed to scare away wild elephants back to the forest, who have strayed into human habitation), after being speared by burning iron rods in full view of the WB Forest Department personnels. The mother elephant along with it's calf strayed into Jhargram town on Thursday. The mother elephant, believed to be pregnant, was struggling to walk and wriggling in pain after the burning rod stuck above its hind legs, and eventually collapsed on the ground. --------------------------------- VIOLATION OF THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT'S ORDER --------------------------------- In the Prerna Singh Bindra vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2018, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Ordered several restrictions regarding the use of fireballs and spikes to drive away elephants. Here are the excerpts of the Order involving the State of West Bengal:- "We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State of West Bengal. In an affidavit dated 12th October, 2018, the Union of India has annexed a Report of the Inspector General of Forests (Project Elephant Division) in compliance of the order dated 17th September, 2018 passed by this Court. In the Report, with regard to the State of West Bengal, it is stated in paragraphs 7 to 9 as follows: “7.The West Bengal State Forest Department have categorically informed that the hula parties are being controlled by the Department staff and they are not using any inhuman methods especially throwing fire balls etc. while driving away the elephants from the crop fields. No spiked barricades or pillars are erected in West Bengal for control of crop raiding by elephants." "Learned counsel for the State of West Bengal further says that the State of West Bengal will consult the Wildlife Institute of India for advice on the use of commonly used repellent methods as well as new repellent methods and deterrent methods mentioned in the Guidelines for the purpose of reducing, if not, eliminating human elephant conflicts." "The statement of learned counsel for the State of West Bengal is taken on record and it is made clear that the State of West Bengal is bound by that statement. With regard to the use of mashaals, it is submitted that this is the only method presently available to the State of West Bengal and the migration of elephants is due to start any day and perhaps it may not be possible to implement any other method to avoid human elephant conflict. As an emergency measure, under the direct control of the Forest Department, mashaals may be used for the time being only to avoid any deaths and crop damage that may take place and ensure the proper movement of elephants in the corridors. The mashaals be used only in an emergency. As far as spikes of all kinds are concerned, it is categorically stated by learned counsel for the State of West Bengal that they are not being used and will not be used." ---------------------------------------- The West Bengal Government is a total failure at all ends. They can't even keep their promise which they made before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. This killing of the elephant at Jhargram is not only tragic but a complete violation of the Hon’ble Supreme Court's Order. I would expect that responsibility is fixed and the guilty should be punished appropriately as per the provisions of the Law. Bhupender Yadav Maneka Sanjay Gandhi MoEF&CC prerna singh bindra 🐘🐅🐾 PETA India Parveen Kaswan, IFS Gauri Maulekhi Meet Ashar @IndiaHSI SAGE- Stripes And Green Earth Foundation

Let alone Women's Safety, Mamata Banerjee's inept Administration can't even protect an elephant, that too after remaining complicit while Hon'ble Supreme Court of India's Order was being violated. A pregnant elephant gets murdered by 'Hula party' (squads comprising people, armed with searchlights, flaming torches and crackers, deployed to scare away wild elephants back to the forest, who have strayed into human habitation), after being speared by burning iron rods in full view of the WB Forest Department personnels. The mother elephant along with it's calf strayed into Jhargram town on Thursday. The mother elephant, believed to be pregnant, was struggling to walk and wriggling in pain after the burning rod stuck above its hind legs, and eventually collapsed on the ground. --------------------------------- VIOLATION OF THE HON’BLE SUPREME COURT'S ORDER --------------------------------- In the Prerna Singh Bindra vs Union Of India on 4 December, 2018, the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India Ordered several restrictions regarding the use of fireballs and spikes to drive away elephants. Here are the excerpts of the Order involving the State of West Bengal:- "We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State of West Bengal. In an affidavit dated 12th October, 2018, the Union of India has annexed a Report of the Inspector General of Forests (Project Elephant Division) in compliance of the order dated 17th September, 2018 passed by this Court. In the Report, with regard to the State of West Bengal, it is stated in paragraphs 7 to 9 as follows: “7.The West Bengal State Forest Department have categorically informed that the hula parties are being controlled by the Department staff and they are not using any inhuman methods especially throwing fire balls etc. while driving away the elephants from the crop fields. No spiked barricades or pillars are erected in West Bengal for control of crop raiding by elephants." "Learned counsel for the State of West Bengal further says that the State of West Bengal will consult the Wildlife Institute of India for advice on the use of commonly used repellent methods as well as new repellent methods and deterrent methods mentioned in the Guidelines for the purpose of reducing, if not, eliminating human elephant conflicts." "The statement of learned counsel for the State of West Bengal is taken on record and it is made clear that the State of West Bengal is bound by that statement. With regard to the use of mashaals, it is submitted that this is the only method presently available to the State of West Bengal and the migration of elephants is due to start any day and perhaps it may not be possible to implement any other method to avoid human elephant conflict. As an emergency measure, under the direct control of the Forest Department, mashaals may be used for the time being only to avoid any deaths and crop damage that may take place and ensure the proper movement of elephants in the corridors. The mashaals be used only in an emergency. As far as spikes of all kinds are concerned, it is categorically stated by learned counsel for the State of West Bengal that they are not being used and will not be used." ---------------------------------------- The West Bengal Government is a total failure at all ends. They can't even keep their promise which they made before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. This killing of the elephant at Jhargram is not only tragic but a complete violation of the Hon’ble Supreme Court's Order. I would expect that responsibility is fixed and the guilty should be punished appropriately as per the provisions of the Law. Bhupender Yadav Maneka Sanjay Gandhi MoEF&CC prerna singh bindra 🐘🐅🐾 PETA India Parveen Kaswan, IFS Gauri Maulekhi Meet Ashar @IndiaHSI SAGE- Stripes And Green Earth Foundation

Suvendu Adhikari

222,540 views • 2 years ago

Today this woman came to my office with a very sad case seeking justice for her son, who is a student at Bookshine Academy School in Mwiki. The mother informed me that they had just come from the hospital where she had taken her son for treatment after he was allegedly brutally assaulted by the school principal together with five other teachers. According to the mother and the young boy, the teachers alleged that the student was involved in a relationship with a girl in the same school. What is even more disturbing is that the school allegedly never informed or called the parents about what had happened to their child despite the injuries he sustained. The young boy had a red eye, severe pain, and visible assault marks on his back. The mother also confirmed that an X-ray report from the hospital indicated that the boy sustained head injuries as a result of the alleged assault. I personally called the school principal, who acknowledged that the incident happened and asked for forgiveness. He requested to sit down with the parent so that the matter could be resolved amicably. However, the boy alleges that the principal personally took the matter into his own hands and used excessive force on him. It is also alleged that the principal had interest in the same girl the boy was allegedly in a relationship with, and therefore he may have been settling scores with the young boy instead of professionally handling the matter as a teacher and administrator. The student further stated that were it not for a CRE teacher who intervened and cried out for him, the assault could have continued. Despite the apology from the principal, the mother could not accept it because her son is still in pain, traumatized, and recovering from the injuries he sustained. I advised the family on the proper legal and administrative channels to follow to ensure that the young boy gets justice. Discipline in schools is important, but it should never reach the level of brutality, violence, or endangering the life of a child. Teachers are entrusted with the responsibility of guiding, mentoring, and protecting learners, not inflicting physical harm on them. This matter will also be forwarded to the Ministry of Education for further investigations and action to ensure accountability and the safety of students in learning institutions. My appeal to all teachers and school administrators is to always handle students with professionalism, restraint, and humanity. Let us discipline children through guidance and counseling, not violence and excessive punishment that leaves learners injured and traumatized.

Today this woman came to my office with a very sad case seeking justice for her son, who is a student at Bookshine Academy School in Mwiki. The mother informed me that they had just come from the hospital where she had taken her son for treatment after he was allegedly brutally assaulted by the school principal together with five other teachers. According to the mother and the young boy, the teachers alleged that the student was involved in a relationship with a girl in the same school. What is even more disturbing is that the school allegedly never informed or called the parents about what had happened to their child despite the injuries he sustained. The young boy had a red eye, severe pain, and visible assault marks on his back. The mother also confirmed that an X-ray report from the hospital indicated that the boy sustained head injuries as a result of the alleged assault. I personally called the school principal, who acknowledged that the incident happened and asked for forgiveness. He requested to sit down with the parent so that the matter could be resolved amicably. However, the boy alleges that the principal personally took the matter into his own hands and used excessive force on him. It is also alleged that the principal had interest in the same girl the boy was allegedly in a relationship with, and therefore he may have been settling scores with the young boy instead of professionally handling the matter as a teacher and administrator. The student further stated that were it not for a CRE teacher who intervened and cried out for him, the assault could have continued. Despite the apology from the principal, the mother could not accept it because her son is still in pain, traumatized, and recovering from the injuries he sustained. I advised the family on the proper legal and administrative channels to follow to ensure that the young boy gets justice. Discipline in schools is important, but it should never reach the level of brutality, violence, or endangering the life of a child. Teachers are entrusted with the responsibility of guiding, mentoring, and protecting learners, not inflicting physical harm on them. This matter will also be forwarded to the Ministry of Education for further investigations and action to ensure accountability and the safety of students in learning institutions. My appeal to all teachers and school administrators is to always handle students with professionalism, restraint, and humanity. Let us discipline children through guidance and counseling, not violence and excessive punishment that leaves learners injured and traumatized.

Geoffrey Mosiria

16,169 views • 3 months ago

I FIND GREATER BUSHENYI TO BE INCREDIBLE! KAMPALA SACCOS MAY WANT TO MAKE STUDY TOURS HERE Over this Easter holiday in Bushenyi, I was hoping to find some time to write a more formal piece on law. Instead, as you can see in these clips, Kabagareme, the booming Saturday meat market got in the way. You will never find a better meal, a better price and the extra satisfaction of actually supporting the local people’s “hustle” Deeply satisfying on all fronts. Kabagarame is yet another example of the high levels of civic awareness and organization of the people here. Apart from always being well represented in National since independence, Bushenyi has achieved social-economic transformation through embracing formal education very early on. It’s not uncommon to find families with three generations of university graduates here unlike almost anywhere else in Uganda. Most 50-60 year old Ugandans are one generation removed from peasantry. And, I think that Bushenyi’s case is not the case of the “diploma disease” that afflicts Uganda, generally. There’s a big difference between papers and an education. The former, I hear, you can buy at Nasser road, the latter, you cannot. It must translate in the way you think and live. The people here for example, organized their land holding as early as the 1960s when most land here got surveyed and titled. Elsewhere, land fragmentation, disorder, disputes and violence still block economic progress. Access to credit for example, is much easier when you have titled land. The per capita income here is even by visual estimation only, high. Generally, every household has a combination of any of the following crops; coffee, tea and bananas or all three. They will generally keep at least a few crossbred cows. Each of those is a cash crop in its own right. I have never seen a grass thatched house here. Especially tea factories dot the magically beautiful green hills along with several schools whose performance in the National exam, a National obsession, is among the very best in the country. The stretch between Kyamuhunga and Kasese covering the present day Rubirizi and Bunyarunguru districts is perhaps, the most beautiful part of Uganda. It spots the beautiful magical twin crater lakes of Kyema and Kamweru (“Africa”), the Kazinga channel, lakes Edward and George. One can have the breathtaking, sweeping panoramic views of Queen Elizabeth National park, Mountain Rwenzori, and all aforesaid lakes, atop the West arm of the great East Africa rift valley. There are so many hotels in Bunyaruguru of which Kyangabi Crater Resort has always been my favorite. Although, it has to be said, the views are at King Fisher Lodge. The big revelation to me this holiday however is how well the SACCOS here seem to be doing. I took interest in taking a closer look at upcountry SACCOS from my friend Muhimbise Atiki and Kakande Alex ‘s recent analysis of Y-SAVE’s no dividend in two years situation. From anecdotal evidence, the biggest SACCOS here include Kyamuhunga, Mushanga and Muhame. At least two of these SACCOS have a loan portfolio of ugx. 50BN each! Today, one declared and gave dividends. SACCOS might be the local solution that has been brewing to building local capital. SACCOS might also finally break the back of the trust deficit and therefore high risk that underbelly Uganda borrowing resulting in high interest rates. Kampala SACCOS may, after putting down The Intelligent Investor, need to come here for a practical education. There’s a lot to admire and learn.

I FIND GREATER BUSHENYI TO BE INCREDIBLE! KAMPALA SACCOS MAY WANT TO MAKE STUDY TOURS HERE Over this Easter holiday in Bushenyi, I was hoping to find some time to write a more formal piece on law. Instead, as you can see in these clips, Kabagareme, the booming Saturday meat market got in the way. You will never find a better meal, a better price and the extra satisfaction of actually supporting the local people’s “hustle” Deeply satisfying on all fronts. Kabagarame is yet another example of the high levels of civic awareness and organization of the people here. Apart from always being well represented in National since independence, Bushenyi has achieved social-economic transformation through embracing formal education very early on. It’s not uncommon to find families with three generations of university graduates here unlike almost anywhere else in Uganda. Most 50-60 year old Ugandans are one generation removed from peasantry. And, I think that Bushenyi’s case is not the case of the “diploma disease” that afflicts Uganda, generally. There’s a big difference between papers and an education. The former, I hear, you can buy at Nasser road, the latter, you cannot. It must translate in the way you think and live. The people here for example, organized their land holding as early as the 1960s when most land here got surveyed and titled. Elsewhere, land fragmentation, disorder, disputes and violence still block economic progress. Access to credit for example, is much easier when you have titled land. The per capita income here is even by visual estimation only, high. Generally, every household has a combination of any of the following crops; coffee, tea and bananas or all three. They will generally keep at least a few crossbred cows. Each of those is a cash crop in its own right. I have never seen a grass thatched house here. Especially tea factories dot the magically beautiful green hills along with several schools whose performance in the National exam, a National obsession, is among the very best in the country. The stretch between Kyamuhunga and Kasese covering the present day Rubirizi and Bunyarunguru districts is perhaps, the most beautiful part of Uganda. It spots the beautiful magical twin crater lakes of Kyema and Kamweru (“Africa”), the Kazinga channel, lakes Edward and George. One can have the breathtaking, sweeping panoramic views of Queen Elizabeth National park, Mountain Rwenzori, and all aforesaid lakes, atop the West arm of the great East Africa rift valley. There are so many hotels in Bunyaruguru of which Kyangabi Crater Resort has always been my favorite. Although, it has to be said, the views are at King Fisher Lodge. The big revelation to me this holiday however is how well the SACCOS here seem to be doing. I took interest in taking a closer look at upcountry SACCOS from my friend Muhimbise Atiki and Kakande Alex ‘s recent analysis of Y-SAVE’s no dividend in two years situation. From anecdotal evidence, the biggest SACCOS here include Kyamuhunga, Mushanga and Muhame. At least two of these SACCOS have a loan portfolio of ugx. 50BN each! Today, one declared and gave dividends. SACCOS might be the local solution that has been brewing to building local capital. SACCOS might also finally break the back of the trust deficit and therefore high risk that underbelly Uganda borrowing resulting in high interest rates. Kampala SACCOS may, after putting down The Intelligent Investor, need to come here for a practical education. There’s a lot to admire and learn.

John Musiime

13,698 views • 2 years ago

Allow me to make something absolutely clear to all of you. And yes, I am angry. I am independent. I am not the mainstream media. That means I have more freedom in what I do. I am beholden to no one. The mainstream media is careful. They’re controlled. They stay safe. I do not. I have the freedom to report every fact I find, even when it makes people angry. During the Anthony case, I was able to expose bad actors because I put in the work. That meant hours of investigating, collecting documentation, and gathering information. It was also how I was able to warn people that witnesses were being doxxed and that the family was being threatened. Through all of this, I became friends with Jeff. Jeff is a father grieving a murdered son. He was dragged through the mud and muzzled, unable to speak. I spent hours with him on the phone, sometimes late into the night. He would vent. Sometimes he would cry. But worst of all, none of his feelings could be publicly known. He was swatted six times. Meghan was also swatted. People can argue over intent, but the reality is that sending armed police to someone’s home repeatedly creates a dangerous situation for that family. Austin was called “worm food.” People mocked a murdered child. Charleston White said, “He should have killed both of them.” This disgusting rhetoric went on for a year while Jeff was unable to speak publicly or defend his dead son. That is why I told Jeff that when the gag order was lifted and the trial was over, I would give him an interview. Unlike the mainstream media, he would have the freedom to say whatever he wanted without interruption. He would not have had that freedom anywhere else. I could not care less what people think about that decision. I knew things would be clipped and taken out of context. They’ve been doing it since the beginning. That was never a surprise to me. This interview was for Jeff. It was not for them. It was not for you. It was to allow Jeff to finally get every ounce of anger, sadness, grief, rage, and pain off his chest. I’m glad we did it. If you are angry at me for it, then you do not understand grief. If you are angry because you think I should have controlled the interview more, then you do not understand the pain he has lived with for the last year. My goal was simple: give him the microphone, step back, and let him talk. Most people seem to understand that. Some do not. Many are angry that I gave Jeff the freedom and platform to express thoughts he has been forced to keep buried for an entire year. As for the clips being shared out of context, I want everyone to hear the full context. Yes, Jeff called Karmelo a “watermelon felon.” No, he did not say it because he is racist. He said it while sarcastically mocking the people who constantly clip words out of context and chase viral moments. They have spent a year calling him racist. His point was that if they wanted something to clip and spread around the internet, he’d give them exactly what they were looking for. That is the context. And I don’t blame him. If you’re angry that I gave him a platform to say what he wanted, I truly do not care. I don’t even know how to explain how much I do not care. I love the Metcalf family. I love Jeff. And this is what he wanted. For once, Jeff got to do what HE wanted to do. He is the father of a dead son who spent a year being told to stay quiet while people lied about him, mocked his family, and celebrated his pain. I warned all of you how evil some of these people are. I’ve known it for the past year. The Metcalf family has lived it, and so have I. These people do not just threaten to kill you. They threaten to destroy you. They threaten your family. They are not above threatening children. We already knew this. Now many of you are finally seeing it for yourselves. And if a few words from a grieving father are enough to outrage you, then you might want to grow a thicker skin.

Allow me to make something absolutely clear to all of you. And yes, I am angry. I am independent. I am not the mainstream media. That means I have more freedom in what I do. I am beholden to no one. The mainstream media is careful. They’re controlled. They stay safe. I do not. I have the freedom to report every fact I find, even when it makes people angry. During the Anthony case, I was able to expose bad actors because I put in the work. That meant hours of investigating, collecting documentation, and gathering information. It was also how I was able to warn people that witnesses were being doxxed and that the family was being threatened. Through all of this, I became friends with Jeff. Jeff is a father grieving a murdered son. He was dragged through the mud and muzzled, unable to speak. I spent hours with him on the phone, sometimes late into the night. He would vent. Sometimes he would cry. But worst of all, none of his feelings could be publicly known. He was swatted six times. Meghan was also swatted. People can argue over intent, but the reality is that sending armed police to someone’s home repeatedly creates a dangerous situation for that family. Austin was called “worm food.” People mocked a murdered child. Charleston White said, “He should have killed both of them.” This disgusting rhetoric went on for a year while Jeff was unable to speak publicly or defend his dead son. That is why I told Jeff that when the gag order was lifted and the trial was over, I would give him an interview. Unlike the mainstream media, he would have the freedom to say whatever he wanted without interruption. He would not have had that freedom anywhere else. I could not care less what people think about that decision. I knew things would be clipped and taken out of context. They’ve been doing it since the beginning. That was never a surprise to me. This interview was for Jeff. It was not for them. It was not for you. It was to allow Jeff to finally get every ounce of anger, sadness, grief, rage, and pain off his chest. I’m glad we did it. If you are angry at me for it, then you do not understand grief. If you are angry because you think I should have controlled the interview more, then you do not understand the pain he has lived with for the last year. My goal was simple: give him the microphone, step back, and let him talk. Most people seem to understand that. Some do not. Many are angry that I gave Jeff the freedom and platform to express thoughts he has been forced to keep buried for an entire year. As for the clips being shared out of context, I want everyone to hear the full context. Yes, Jeff called Karmelo a “watermelon felon.” No, he did not say it because he is racist. He said it while sarcastically mocking the people who constantly clip words out of context and chase viral moments. They have spent a year calling him racist. His point was that if they wanted something to clip and spread around the internet, he’d give them exactly what they were looking for. That is the context. And I don’t blame him. If you’re angry that I gave him a platform to say what he wanted, I truly do not care. I don’t even know how to explain how much I do not care. I love the Metcalf family. I love Jeff. And this is what he wanted. For once, Jeff got to do what HE wanted to do. He is the father of a dead son who spent a year being told to stay quiet while people lied about him, mocked his family, and celebrated his pain. I warned all of you how evil some of these people are. I’ve known it for the past year. The Metcalf family has lived it, and so have I. These people do not just threaten to kill you. They threaten to destroy you. They threaten your family. They are not above threatening children. We already knew this. Now many of you are finally seeing it for yourselves. And if a few words from a grieving father are enough to outrage you, then you might want to grow a thicker skin.

Sarah Fields

213,634 views • 2 months ago

“We Raped Your Daughter and Wife in Front of You. You Are Not a Man”: Samer Osman Recounts How a Sudanese Officer Died of Anguish Inside a UAE-Backed Rapid Support Militia Detention Centre In a harrowing video testimony, Samer Osman recounts one of the most painful incidents he witnessed inside a detention centre operated by the UAE-backed Rapid Support Militia in Khartoum. His account centres on a captured Sudanese officer lying on the floor with his hands tightly bound behind his back. According to Osman, a militia member named Abdullah stood before the prisoner and told him: “We raped your daughter and your wife in front of you. Where is your manhood now?” The man laughed and boasted about what he said they had done before telling the bound officer: “You are not a man.” When the officer heard those words, he tried to reach Abdullah despite the restraints holding his hands behind his back. He threw his body forward with whatever strength he had left, falling from side to side as he struggled to stand, defend himself or reach the man boasting about the rape of his family. Abdullah then kicked him in the stomach and face as he lay bound on the ground, and walked away. The words were more painful than the kicks. Osman said the other detainees became enraged when they heard the taunt. They were watching a helpless man being psychologically destroyed while his tormentor laughed and used the reported rape of his wife and daughter to humiliate him. Militia guards opened the detention-cell door and fired at the prisoners, killing eleven of them, according to Osman’s testimony. Eleven men died. Yet Osman said that, at that moment, even the pain of their deaths felt less devastating than the words Abdullah had spoken. Every prisoner understood what the militia was doing. It was attacking the officer’s body, dignity, memory and family at the same time, turning his wife and daughter into instruments of torture and leaving him trapped with the image of them in the hands of men who boasted about abusing them. The officer remained bound in the same position. For three days, he kept his head lowered to the ground and refused food and water. The detainees gave him portions of their meagre food and scarce water, brought the plate close to his face, surrendered their own rations and tried to feed him with their hands. He turned his head away and spat out the food, even when they placed it in his mouth. They remained thirsty so that he could have their water. The other prisoners gathered around a man overwhelmed by trauma and pleaded with him to eat, drink and speak. A religious elder named Sheikh Ali repeatedly came to him, reminding him of God and speaking about faith, goodness and the Quran, trying to hold on to his spirit before it slipped away. After three days, the officer finally said: “I just want to breathe.” Some detainees removed their torn shirts and used them to fan him. They offered him water, and he took one sip before saying that he wanted no more. Osman urged him to speak: “My brother, please talk. Let out what is inside you. Try.” The officer raised his head, looked at him with bloodshot eyes and said: “Leave me alone, everyone. Please, leave me alone.” Then he gave the detainees his final instruction: “Whoever among you gets out alive, I entrust him with seeking justice for my wife and daughter.” When the time came for Fajr, the Muslim dawn prayer, they tried to lift him into a position in which he could pray. The militia had refused to remove his restraints from the moment he was brought into the detention centre. They lifted him upright, and he collapsed onto his right side. They tried to support him again, but he could no longer hold himself up. One prisoner held him while another religious elder, Sheikh Khalid, came to help. “He has become heavy,” Sheikh Khalid said. He touched the officer and then told the others: “May God have mercy on him.” The man died bound at dawn. According to Osman, the officer died from overwhelming anguish and oppression, left alone with the image of his wife and daughter and what the militia member claimed had been done to them. At the time the testimony was recorded, Osman said the detainees still did not know whether the two women were alive, whether the militia had killed them or what had happened to them. The reported rape and their fate remain part of Osman’s testimony, with no independent information available to confirm the details. Osman’s account illuminates the wider system of torture established by the Rapid Support Militia across Khartoum. The militia converted civilian buildings, schools and military facilities into detention centres where prisoners described beatings, starvation, humiliation, psychological torture and executions. It left behind emaciated survivors, burial sites and thousands of families still searching for missing relatives. In March 2025, the Guardian published an investigation from a former militia base near the village of Garri, approximately 70 kilometres north of Khartoum, after the Sudanese military recaptured the site. Journalists found a previously unknown detention centre with shackles hanging from doors, apparent punishment chambers and bloodstains on the floor. Nearby, they discovered an extensive burial ground containing at least 550 unmarked graves, some of which appeared to contain more than one body. The newspaper reported that more than 500 people may have been tortured or starved to death before being buried there. Doctors examined 135 civilians rescued from the detention centre and found widespread signs of torture and chronic malnutrition. Some survivors were unable to walk and had to be carried outside, while many were too traumatised to speak. Satellite imagery showed that the graves appeared after the militia seized the base, and a Human Rights Watch expert said the site could constitute one of the largest atrocity crime scenes discovered in Sudan since the war began. Read the Guardian investigation The Guardian later reported the story of Alwaleed Abdeen, a 35-year-old Sudanese entrepreneur held for six months inside a school that the militia had converted into a prison in Jebel Aulia, south of Khartoum. In the last video recorded after his rescue, Abdeen was so emaciated that his friends struggled to recognise him even after he spoke his name. His bones were visible beneath his skin after months of starvation and torture, and he later died in hospital. Read the Guardian report on Alwaleed Abdeen The individual incident described by Osman still requires an independent investigation, yet its details fit a documented pattern that emerged as the militia was driven from extensive areas of Khartoum, Omdurman and Bahri: secret detention centres, starvation, restraints, beatings, humiliation, deaths in custody and burial grounds beside the places where prisoners were tortured. Those responsible for such acts have stripped themselves of every trace of humanity. Armed thugs were transformed into a military and political project through the continued flow of weapons, money and foreign logistical support. Over the course of Sudan’s war, hundreds of reports, investigations, documented materials, UN findings and official assessments have built an extensive, cumulative record of multifaceted Emirati support for the Rapid Support Militia. This evidence has drawn on flight data, satellite imagery, weapons and ammunition analysis, export documentation, commercial records and witness testimony. Together, these sources have revealed a support system involving weapons, ammunition, drones, military vehicles, financing, logistics, training networks and foreign mercenaries, alongside political, diplomatic and media support that helped the militia sustain its war and crimes against the Sudanese people. The UAE has repeatedly denied providing military support to the militia. This testimony also provides a clear answer to those who try to manufacture a divide between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Sudanese people. Army officers are part of the Sudanese people, drawn from the same homes, neighbourhoods, towns and villages. They and their families have endured the same killings, detention, torture, displacement and abuses inflicted on civilians, and in many cases have faced additional targeting because of their military service. That officer was a Sudanese man, a husband and a father before every other title, and his tragedy formed part of the tragedy of an entire nation. Osman’s testimony also answers a question often asked by those who struggle to understand why Sudanese people continue to fight and mobilise in defence of their cities and homeland. The answer lies inside that detention centre. People fight because they have seen what the Janjaweed, the militias from which the Rapid Support Militia emerged, did when they seized neighbourhoods, homes and the bodies of civilians. They fight so that another bound man will never have to face someone boasting about raping his wife and daughter. They mobilise so that schools do not become prisons, football fields do not become graveyards, homes do not become military barracks, and women are never again used as instruments for torturing their husbands and fathers. After all this, some advocates of political settlements continue asking Sudanese people to negotiate with the militia’s commanders and grant them a new position in government. The meaning of such a proposal is clear: reward armed men for what they have done and return the tormentor to power over his victims through a political agreement. Negotiations can serve specific purposes, including ending the fighting, securing the militia’s disarmament, releasing detainees, determining the fate of the disappeared, opening burial sites to investigation and holding those responsible accountable. A settlement that preserves the militia’s army, influence and share of political power would amount to political surrender before a project built through killing, rape, torture and humiliation. The Sudanese people reject any military or political role for this militia in the country’s future government. That rejection will endure however long the road becomes, even if the war continues for years, because allowing the militia to remain within the state would leave every Sudanese family living under the threat of the detention cell, the torturer and the mass grave. Osman addressed the officer who had died in restraints: “By God, as you lie in your grave, your daughter and wife have been avenged many times over.” Those words carry the pain of a survivor and the anger of an entire people. The justice Sudan needs begins with defeating the militia’s project, disarming it, holding its commanders and perpetrators accountable, confronting those who armed it, and ensuring that it never returns to rule Sudanese people under any name or political settlement. #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism

“We Raped Your Daughter and Wife in Front of You. You Are Not a Man”: Samer Osman Recounts How a Sudanese Officer Died of Anguish Inside a UAE-Backed Rapid Support Militia Detention Centre In a harrowing video testimony, Samer Osman recounts one of the most painful incidents he witnessed inside a detention centre operated by the UAE-backed Rapid Support Militia in Khartoum. His account centres on a captured Sudanese officer lying on the floor with his hands tightly bound behind his back. According to Osman, a militia member named Abdullah stood before the prisoner and told him: “We raped your daughter and your wife in front of you. Where is your manhood now?” The man laughed and boasted about what he said they had done before telling the bound officer: “You are not a man.” When the officer heard those words, he tried to reach Abdullah despite the restraints holding his hands behind his back. He threw his body forward with whatever strength he had left, falling from side to side as he struggled to stand, defend himself or reach the man boasting about the rape of his family. Abdullah then kicked him in the stomach and face as he lay bound on the ground, and walked away. The words were more painful than the kicks. Osman said the other detainees became enraged when they heard the taunt. They were watching a helpless man being psychologically destroyed while his tormentor laughed and used the reported rape of his wife and daughter to humiliate him. Militia guards opened the detention-cell door and fired at the prisoners, killing eleven of them, according to Osman’s testimony. Eleven men died. Yet Osman said that, at that moment, even the pain of their deaths felt less devastating than the words Abdullah had spoken. Every prisoner understood what the militia was doing. It was attacking the officer’s body, dignity, memory and family at the same time, turning his wife and daughter into instruments of torture and leaving him trapped with the image of them in the hands of men who boasted about abusing them. The officer remained bound in the same position. For three days, he kept his head lowered to the ground and refused food and water. The detainees gave him portions of their meagre food and scarce water, brought the plate close to his face, surrendered their own rations and tried to feed him with their hands. He turned his head away and spat out the food, even when they placed it in his mouth. They remained thirsty so that he could have their water. The other prisoners gathered around a man overwhelmed by trauma and pleaded with him to eat, drink and speak. A religious elder named Sheikh Ali repeatedly came to him, reminding him of God and speaking about faith, goodness and the Quran, trying to hold on to his spirit before it slipped away. After three days, the officer finally said: “I just want to breathe.” Some detainees removed their torn shirts and used them to fan him. They offered him water, and he took one sip before saying that he wanted no more. Osman urged him to speak: “My brother, please talk. Let out what is inside you. Try.” The officer raised his head, looked at him with bloodshot eyes and said: “Leave me alone, everyone. Please, leave me alone.” Then he gave the detainees his final instruction: “Whoever among you gets out alive, I entrust him with seeking justice for my wife and daughter.” When the time came for Fajr, the Muslim dawn prayer, they tried to lift him into a position in which he could pray. The militia had refused to remove his restraints from the moment he was brought into the detention centre. They lifted him upright, and he collapsed onto his right side. They tried to support him again, but he could no longer hold himself up. One prisoner held him while another religious elder, Sheikh Khalid, came to help. “He has become heavy,” Sheikh Khalid said. He touched the officer and then told the others: “May God have mercy on him.” The man died bound at dawn. According to Osman, the officer died from overwhelming anguish and oppression, left alone with the image of his wife and daughter and what the militia member claimed had been done to them. At the time the testimony was recorded, Osman said the detainees still did not know whether the two women were alive, whether the militia had killed them or what had happened to them. The reported rape and their fate remain part of Osman’s testimony, with no independent information available to confirm the details. Osman’s account illuminates the wider system of torture established by the Rapid Support Militia across Khartoum. The militia converted civilian buildings, schools and military facilities into detention centres where prisoners described beatings, starvation, humiliation, psychological torture and executions. It left behind emaciated survivors, burial sites and thousands of families still searching for missing relatives. In March 2025, the Guardian published an investigation from a former militia base near the village of Garri, approximately 70 kilometres north of Khartoum, after the Sudanese military recaptured the site. Journalists found a previously unknown detention centre with shackles hanging from doors, apparent punishment chambers and bloodstains on the floor. Nearby, they discovered an extensive burial ground containing at least 550 unmarked graves, some of which appeared to contain more than one body. The newspaper reported that more than 500 people may have been tortured or starved to death before being buried there. Doctors examined 135 civilians rescued from the detention centre and found widespread signs of torture and chronic malnutrition. Some survivors were unable to walk and had to be carried outside, while many were too traumatised to speak. Satellite imagery showed that the graves appeared after the militia seized the base, and a Human Rights Watch expert said the site could constitute one of the largest atrocity crime scenes discovered in Sudan since the war began. Read the Guardian investigation The Guardian later reported the story of Alwaleed Abdeen, a 35-year-old Sudanese entrepreneur held for six months inside a school that the militia had converted into a prison in Jebel Aulia, south of Khartoum. In the last video recorded after his rescue, Abdeen was so emaciated that his friends struggled to recognise him even after he spoke his name. His bones were visible beneath his skin after months of starvation and torture, and he later died in hospital. Read the Guardian report on Alwaleed Abdeen The individual incident described by Osman still requires an independent investigation, yet its details fit a documented pattern that emerged as the militia was driven from extensive areas of Khartoum, Omdurman and Bahri: secret detention centres, starvation, restraints, beatings, humiliation, deaths in custody and burial grounds beside the places where prisoners were tortured. Those responsible for such acts have stripped themselves of every trace of humanity. Armed thugs were transformed into a military and political project through the continued flow of weapons, money and foreign logistical support. Over the course of Sudan’s war, hundreds of reports, investigations, documented materials, UN findings and official assessments have built an extensive, cumulative record of multifaceted Emirati support for the Rapid Support Militia. This evidence has drawn on flight data, satellite imagery, weapons and ammunition analysis, export documentation, commercial records and witness testimony. Together, these sources have revealed a support system involving weapons, ammunition, drones, military vehicles, financing, logistics, training networks and foreign mercenaries, alongside political, diplomatic and media support that helped the militia sustain its war and crimes against the Sudanese people. The UAE has repeatedly denied providing military support to the militia. This testimony also provides a clear answer to those who try to manufacture a divide between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Sudanese people. Army officers are part of the Sudanese people, drawn from the same homes, neighbourhoods, towns and villages. They and their families have endured the same killings, detention, torture, displacement and abuses inflicted on civilians, and in many cases have faced additional targeting because of their military service. That officer was a Sudanese man, a husband and a father before every other title, and his tragedy formed part of the tragedy of an entire nation. Osman’s testimony also answers a question often asked by those who struggle to understand why Sudanese people continue to fight and mobilise in defence of their cities and homeland. The answer lies inside that detention centre. People fight because they have seen what the Janjaweed, the militias from which the Rapid Support Militia emerged, did when they seized neighbourhoods, homes and the bodies of civilians. They fight so that another bound man will never have to face someone boasting about raping his wife and daughter. They mobilise so that schools do not become prisons, football fields do not become graveyards, homes do not become military barracks, and women are never again used as instruments for torturing their husbands and fathers. After all this, some advocates of political settlements continue asking Sudanese people to negotiate with the militia’s commanders and grant them a new position in government. The meaning of such a proposal is clear: reward armed men for what they have done and return the tormentor to power over his victims through a political agreement. Negotiations can serve specific purposes, including ending the fighting, securing the militia’s disarmament, releasing detainees, determining the fate of the disappeared, opening burial sites to investigation and holding those responsible accountable. A settlement that preserves the militia’s army, influence and share of political power would amount to political surrender before a project built through killing, rape, torture and humiliation. The Sudanese people reject any military or political role for this militia in the country’s future government. That rejection will endure however long the road becomes, even if the war continues for years, because allowing the militia to remain within the state would leave every Sudanese family living under the threat of the detention cell, the torturer and the mass grave. Osman addressed the officer who had died in restraints: “By God, as you lie in your grave, your daughter and wife have been avenged many times over.” Those words carry the pain of a survivor and the anger of an entire people. The justice Sudan needs begins with defeating the militia’s project, disarming it, holding its commanders and perpetrators accountable, confronting those who armed it, and ensuring that it never returns to rule Sudanese people under any name or political settlement. #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism

Sudanese Echo

152,116 views • 3 days ago

Brothers, husbands, fathers... listen up. Imagine this: You worked 12-14 hour days, sacrificed your youth, your health, your dreams to build a life for your family. You paid the bills, the EMIs, the kids' school fees. You stayed loyal. You loved her. Then one day, she decides the marriage is 'over.' She walks out. Files for divorce. And the court orders YOU to pay her alimony. Month after month. Year after year. Your hard-earned money. Now here's the gut punch: What if that money is funding her new lifestyle? Hotels with her boyfriend. Weekend getaways. Shopping sprees. Parties. While you're left broke, depressed, fighting suicidal thoughts, struggling to even afford a decent meal or see your own kids? Should the courts grant EVEN ONE RUPEE if she's using it to enjoy with her BF in 5-star hotels? Even the Supreme Court is now calling this out. In a recent hearing before Justice Pardiwala’s bench, a wife demanded ₹5 crore alimony after a marriage that lasted just one year. The husband offered a reasonable ₹35-40 lakh. The court was shocked. Justice Pardiwala warned: “If such is going to be the stance of the wife, we may have to pass some orders which she may not like.” He told the husband’s lawyer, “You will be making a blunder by calling her back. You won’t be able to keep her. Her dreams are very big.” This isn’t support. This is legalized extortion. Alimony was created for a different era – when women had no education, no jobs, no independence. Today? Women are CEOs, earning as much or more. Dual-income homes are normal. Yet family courts still treat men like ATM machines with no expiry date. Real stories are everywhere. Men losing everything – houses, savings, dignity. Forced to pay lifelong alimony even after she remarries or lives with someone else. Courts rarely monitor how the money is spent. No accountability. She posts luxury vacations on Instagram while you're dodging creditors. Why should a man pay if: - She's capable of working but chooses not to? - She's in a new relationship, enjoying life on your dime? - The divorce was her choice, her adultery, her abandonment? - Kids are with you, or grown up? This isn’t equality. In an equal world, alimony should be gender-neutral, time-bound (maybe 1-2 years max for rehabilitation), and STRICTLY for basic needs — not lifestyle maintenance. Receipts mandatory. New partner? Automatic stop. Misuse? Repayment and consequences. Men are dying inside. Suicide rates among divorced men are sky-high. Families destroyed. Children alienated. Society pays the price with broken homes. We need ALIMONY REFORM NOW: - Temporary and needs-based only. - Factor in her income, assets, new relationships. - Equal rights for men too. - No lifelong payments in short marriages. - Audit the spending. End the free ride. If you're a man facing this, know you're not alone. Share your story. Fight back legally. Join men's rights groups. Warn your brothers and sons before marriage — prenups, financial transparency, red flags. To the lawmakers and judges: Stop punishing men for existing. Marriage shouldn’t be a financial trap. True justice is gender-neutral. Protect families, not one side. Tag a man who needs to hear this. Share if you’ve seen the pain. Comment your thoughts — should courts fund her hotel romance with YOUR money? Even the Supreme Court said enough in the 5 crore case. This system must change. For our sons. For justice. For humanity. #MensRights #AlimonyReform #DivorceIsScam #FamilyCourtBias #StopMisuse #JusticePardiwala #SCAlimony

Brothers, husbands, fathers... listen up. Imagine this: You worked 12-14 hour days, sacrificed your youth, your health, your dreams to build a life for your family. You paid the bills, the EMIs, the kids' school fees. You stayed loyal. You loved her. Then one day, she decides the marriage is 'over.' She walks out. Files for divorce. And the court orders YOU to pay her alimony. Month after month. Year after year. Your hard-earned money. Now here's the gut punch: What if that money is funding her new lifestyle? Hotels with her boyfriend. Weekend getaways. Shopping sprees. Parties. While you're left broke, depressed, fighting suicidal thoughts, struggling to even afford a decent meal or see your own kids? Should the courts grant EVEN ONE RUPEE if she's using it to enjoy with her BF in 5-star hotels? Even the Supreme Court is now calling this out. In a recent hearing before Justice Pardiwala’s bench, a wife demanded ₹5 crore alimony after a marriage that lasted just one year. The husband offered a reasonable ₹35-40 lakh. The court was shocked. Justice Pardiwala warned: “If such is going to be the stance of the wife, we may have to pass some orders which she may not like.” He told the husband’s lawyer, “You will be making a blunder by calling her back. You won’t be able to keep her. Her dreams are very big.” This isn’t support. This is legalized extortion. Alimony was created for a different era – when women had no education, no jobs, no independence. Today? Women are CEOs, earning as much or more. Dual-income homes are normal. Yet family courts still treat men like ATM machines with no expiry date. Real stories are everywhere. Men losing everything – houses, savings, dignity. Forced to pay lifelong alimony even after she remarries or lives with someone else. Courts rarely monitor how the money is spent. No accountability. She posts luxury vacations on Instagram while you're dodging creditors. Why should a man pay if: - She's capable of working but chooses not to? - She's in a new relationship, enjoying life on your dime? - The divorce was her choice, her adultery, her abandonment? - Kids are with you, or grown up? This isn’t equality. In an equal world, alimony should be gender-neutral, time-bound (maybe 1-2 years max for rehabilitation), and STRICTLY for basic needs — not lifestyle maintenance. Receipts mandatory. New partner? Automatic stop. Misuse? Repayment and consequences. Men are dying inside. Suicide rates among divorced men are sky-high. Families destroyed. Children alienated. Society pays the price with broken homes. We need ALIMONY REFORM NOW: - Temporary and needs-based only. - Factor in her income, assets, new relationships. - Equal rights for men too. - No lifelong payments in short marriages. - Audit the spending. End the free ride. If you're a man facing this, know you're not alone. Share your story. Fight back legally. Join men's rights groups. Warn your brothers and sons before marriage — prenups, financial transparency, red flags. To the lawmakers and judges: Stop punishing men for existing. Marriage shouldn’t be a financial trap. True justice is gender-neutral. Protect families, not one side. Tag a man who needs to hear this. Share if you’ve seen the pain. Comment your thoughts — should courts fund her hotel romance with YOUR money? Even the Supreme Court said enough in the 5 crore case. This system must change. For our sons. For justice. For humanity. #MensRights #AlimonyReform #DivorceIsScam #FamilyCourtBias #StopMisuse #JusticePardiwala #SCAlimony

SK

14,710 views • 1 month ago

There are some shocking revelations about the Nihal Vihar family dispute case in Outer Delhi 🚨🤯 What everyone already knows: - Vinay Gupta came home and asked his wife Rekha Gupta to apply medicine to one of their twin children as he got hurt few days ago. - Rekha got rattled, went outside and returned within 10 minutes with her brothers and sister-in-law. Before leaving, she switched off the CCTV cameras inside the house so there would be no visual evidence. - Vinay’s mother initially thought they had simply come for a visit. She asked Vinay’s father to offer them water and sweets and turn on the AC for them so they could relax. - While she was outside talking to neighbours, she returned and saw both of Rekha’s brothers pinning Vinay down on the bed and strangling him, with the younger brother placing his leg on Vinay’s stomach. - She tried to stop them and begged them to spare her son, but Rekha’s sister-in-law grabbed her by the hair and pushed her away. - They also beat Vinay’s father, leaving him severely injured. - Vinay’s mother rushed outside the moment she got a chance and called the neighbours for help. But by the time people arrived, Vinay had suffered severe injuries. - He was rushed to the hospital, but the moment they reached, doctors found that he had no pulse. Vinay was no more. His sister has now revealed some shocking things that happened before the incident 🚨 - She said Rekha used to fight with Vinay over small things, including household chores and taking care of their children. - She would repeatedly tell him: “I belong to a rich family. You have no status to tell me what to do.” - She threatened him multiple times, saying: “I’ll bring my brothers and get you beaten if you irritate me again.” - Her brothers had come to their house several times before, but the situation never escalated to this level. According to Vinay’s sister, they would threaten that “it is their family’s history to eliminate son-in-laws if they don’t follow their way.” - She further said that, as far as she knew, something similar had happened with the husband of Rekha’s elder sister. The neighbours added that when Rekha and her brothers were arrested, there was no sign of guilt or remorse. Instead, they were reportedly justifying Vinay’s killing. Vinay’s aunt, his mother’s sister, said: “Their whole family was evil. We mistakenly married our son to their daughter, and now we are suffering because of that decision.” She recalled seeing Vinay completely pale while they were taking him to the hospital. He was telling her that he couldn’t breathe, and she said it was heartbreaking that she couldn’t relieve him from that pain. She also recalled telling Vinay just a few days earlier: “If the marriage isn’t working, just divorce her.” But Vinay told her: “Maasi, I have two children. I have to think about them before myself. If I divorce her, those two will probably live most of their lives without their father. I don’t want that. I love them a lot.” ❤️‍🩹 He was thinking about his children even when his own marriage had fallen apart. He was so selfless that he chose to stay for his children and tragically, that very selflessness has costed him his life. 😔 Hope the judiciary delivers justice to Vinay and his family, and that everyone responsible for this horrific crime receives the strictest punishment under the law. 🙏

There are some shocking revelations about the Nihal Vihar family dispute case in Outer Delhi 🚨🤯 What everyone already knows: - Vinay Gupta came home and asked his wife Rekha Gupta to apply medicine to one of their twin children as he got hurt few days ago. - Rekha got rattled, went outside and returned within 10 minutes with her brothers and sister-in-law. Before leaving, she switched off the CCTV cameras inside the house so there would be no visual evidence. - Vinay’s mother initially thought they had simply come for a visit. She asked Vinay’s father to offer them water and sweets and turn on the AC for them so they could relax. - While she was outside talking to neighbours, she returned and saw both of Rekha’s brothers pinning Vinay down on the bed and strangling him, with the younger brother placing his leg on Vinay’s stomach. - She tried to stop them and begged them to spare her son, but Rekha’s sister-in-law grabbed her by the hair and pushed her away. - They also beat Vinay’s father, leaving him severely injured. - Vinay’s mother rushed outside the moment she got a chance and called the neighbours for help. But by the time people arrived, Vinay had suffered severe injuries. - He was rushed to the hospital, but the moment they reached, doctors found that he had no pulse. Vinay was no more. His sister has now revealed some shocking things that happened before the incident 🚨 - She said Rekha used to fight with Vinay over small things, including household chores and taking care of their children. - She would repeatedly tell him: “I belong to a rich family. You have no status to tell me what to do.” - She threatened him multiple times, saying: “I’ll bring my brothers and get you beaten if you irritate me again.” - Her brothers had come to their house several times before, but the situation never escalated to this level. According to Vinay’s sister, they would threaten that “it is their family’s history to eliminate son-in-laws if they don’t follow their way.” - She further said that, as far as she knew, something similar had happened with the husband of Rekha’s elder sister. The neighbours added that when Rekha and her brothers were arrested, there was no sign of guilt or remorse. Instead, they were reportedly justifying Vinay’s killing. Vinay’s aunt, his mother’s sister, said: “Their whole family was evil. We mistakenly married our son to their daughter, and now we are suffering because of that decision.” She recalled seeing Vinay completely pale while they were taking him to the hospital. He was telling her that he couldn’t breathe, and she said it was heartbreaking that she couldn’t relieve him from that pain. She also recalled telling Vinay just a few days earlier: “If the marriage isn’t working, just divorce her.” But Vinay told her: “Maasi, I have two children. I have to think about them before myself. If I divorce her, those two will probably live most of their lives without their father. I don’t want that. I love them a lot.” ❤️‍🩹 He was thinking about his children even when his own marriage had fallen apart. He was so selfless that he chose to stay for his children and tragically, that very selflessness has costed him his life. 😔 Hope the judiciary delivers justice to Vinay and his family, and that everyone responsible for this horrific crime receives the strictest punishment under the law. 🙏

SaffronVigilant

40,213 views • 11 days ago