Ellison: "The real problem with the case is not that the judge didn't understand the gravity or facts. I'm sure she understands both. The problem is there is no legal precedent for this. We've never seen a moment in American history where through force of arms, a federal administration... was trying to bully a state into submission. The problem with law is it's based on precedent."show more

We’ve never seen a state like Minnesota fight so hard to harbor illegals in direct violation of federal law.

Trump's "crisis" exposed as theater when his czar called Jan 28 drawdown "common sense." Yet Minneapolis bled $2M from 3,000 overtime hours cleaning federal chaos. Ellison's right: no precedent for federal bullying by arms. This lawless admin murders state sovereignty.

People are protesting against Operation Metro Surge and calling for an eviction moratorium.

The problem with using the lawto curb Trump is that he's not following the law. America is now lawless. Eventually, the public will realize they live in a lawless country, and they'll not bother with the law either. Why would they? Wild, Wild West reboot!

Rs have been doing this for decades with policy that targets blue areas. Roger Stone over ran an office doing recounts. Nixon sent in National Guard. They were never stopped. Federal armed thugs is the natural progession.

BREAKING: it has been scientifically, theoretically and antidotedly confirmed that Trump has never told a truth in his life.

Federal law supersedes state law in matters of illegal migration and deportations. 🤷🏻‍♂️

Precedent doesn’t matter. Just ask SCOTUS.

oh. biden doj tried to prevent texas from protecting its own border

This is what panic looks like when criminals get caught. Keith Elison is a criminal.

And once precedent is set through coercion, not law, it reshapes the entire system.

The problem is also the legal leg they are looking to stand on in the suit. Where are the challenges that ICE is being racist? That ICE is trampling on citizen rights? That ICE is mass-assaulting peaceful protesters? Those legal pursuits might have a better chance...

There is absolutely precedence for this. The confederate’s lost. They will lose again.

Um pretty sure the Civil War was literally part of American history and made the precedent clear that the federal laws are enforceable through force. That set the precedent, maybe this douche needs a history lesson.

Hey GOP, make this make actual sense in the America of our forebearers...

His problem with the law, is that it’s against him, not because of precedent.

Trump is the most radical president of all time.

George Wallace would disagree

the only viable conclusion is that the founding fathers were out of their frikken minds

The judge cannot look at the law and say it is being broken

And once precedent is set through coercion, not law, it reshapes the entire system..

@GovTimWalz @AGEllison @MayorFrey How did Minnesota become ground ZERO for both massive welfare fraud and a Sanctuary City Crisis that protected violent Illegal Criminals?

Ellison says the issue isn’t the judge — it’s that there’s no precedent for a federal administration using armed force to pressure a state, and law depends on precedent.

Follow the LAWS

if i dont want to vote i wont , if i dont want to obey the law because i didnt vote for it then i wont , freedom isnt the right to be your own judge and jury

@Grok when in American history have presidents used the National Guard or military forces to enforce federal law?

Where did MINNESOTA ever find such a shit bag like this puke?

@MinnesotaDFL

Ah, so if it hasn't happened before we have no idea what to do, so we do nothing. Got it.

*unless you are a supreme court justice, then you just make the law up.

@KellyMorrisonMN What a zero and corrupt fraud that guy is!

How’s your girlfriend