Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
ELON: AMERICANS HAVE GOTTEN SECURE BORDERS, SAFE CITIES AND SENSIBLE SPENDING Elon: “The American people voted for secure borders, safe cities and sensible spending. That's what they've gotten. A tremendous amount has been accomplished in the first 100 days. It's more than has been accomplished in any administration before,... show more
152,660 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)
10 Kommentare
exactly
Dead ❤️
A lot of GREAT work I’m grateful and thankful 🙏🫡
Thank you to everyone involved with all those accomplishments. Great work! Love and Respect 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Ok right
Exactly—common-sense priorities that D.C. ignored for too long.
Much progress has been made
At a White House cabinet meeting on April 30, 2025, Elon Musk praised the administration’s first 100 days, calling it the most productive in U.S. history, highlighting secure borders, safe cities, and fiscal responsibility.
The numbers showcase the administration’s early wins, praised by Elon Musk and Trump. Border encounters dropped to 7,200 in March 2025, the lowest ever, per the DHS, while DOGE saved $160 billion, according to CNBC. Urban crime rates fell 12% in 100 days, per the DOJ. Musk’s focus on secure borders and sensible spending addressed key voter priorities, as 68% of Americans supported these goals, per Gallup. His efforts streamlined federal efficiency. This progress sets a strong foundation, delivering on campaign promises. That’s results in action.
What has actually changed that the people can actually see, we've apparently saved so much money but it's not going to the people, it's going into the people who are already millionaires. People will be waiting forever for change. It's in plain sight
![Whoopi Goldberg dismisses Pratt losing his house in the wildfires and says he needs to know what he's talking about and offer "solutions" before "passing judgment" on Karen Bass. She claims he doesn't "understand what people are going through": GOLDBERG: No, he's not the answer but here's the thing, nobody -- You know, they have bitched about these wildfires as long as I've lived in California, it's always been -- it's always been a problem. But what I don't like is if you don't have any solutions that have not been already tried or if you're throwing shade on people saying she diverted water from this place -I mean, you have to -- you have to have some idea of what needs to be done. A lot of people were affected by those wildfires, a lot of my friends, a lot of people you know lost everything. HOSTIN: Right. GOLDBERG: So this is not, you know, a ha, ha, let's do an A.I. video. This is real stuff. People -- this is people's lives. And so, before you're passing judgment, you need to be able to tell people what you have to offer, Spencer. [Applause] You know, and, you know, I don't know what qualifies as the right way to be a politician, but what I do know is they have to be the people who understand what people are going through. And if you don't understand what people are going through, in the way they're going through it, when you're talking about communities, whole communities that have been burned out, whole groups, legacies that are gone. It's more than just this. It's all these things. You got to be prepared for a lot more stuff than I think you -- it is a really hard job and in California particularly.](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2054961107781988733/amplify_video_thumb/2054961051175735296/img/3F9XZJjRPFALzMbW.jpg)
![.Scott Jennings schools Ana Navarro on CNN NewsNight after she calls the $1.8 billion DOJ fund to compensate victims of unfair lawfare “reparations.”: Navarro: “Republicans used to balk and be shocked and uh outraged by the idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're going to be giving money to uh January 6th insurrectionists. That part's okay. Yeah, it's it's disgusting.” … Jennings: Have you ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] I have been unfairly targeted by this administration, yeah. Jennings] Have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] Are those the people that are going to be in uh in this— Jennings] So the answer is no, you haven't. So so the issue is, the question is, has anyone in the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Of course they have. And there ought to be just at a top line a way for people to seek recourse if they have been unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started and he was initially seeking damages for that, which he has given up. He'll receive no money as I understand it. And now it has morphed into this idea that there have been people that have been unfairly targeted…. I want a uh do I want a world where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government and it was truly unfair and you truly were had something done to you that should not have been done, do I think people should be able to seek recourse for that? Absolutely I do because I think it probably happens and not on a partisan basis but it probably happens all the time. And I think people ought to be able to seek uh some sort of damages if they've been unfairly targeted by the department or by the federal government.”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2056561012921471241/amplify_video_thumb/2056560945489465344/img/WImukXIGuOvKPqeT.jpg)
