Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Elon Musk Only thing more cringe than posting on LinkedIn is shutting down perfectly working nuclear plants with no reliable domestic replacement except for lignite coal! Fortunately these things are in great shape (especially this one, Brokdorf nuclear plant) and can turn back on.

Mark Nelson

89,254 subscribers

218,591 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Elon Musk

Elon Muskvor 1 Jahr

I instantly lose respect for anyone who posts on LinkedIn. Unbearably cringe.

Profilbild von Jernej Zobec

Jernej Zobecvor 1 Jahr

@elonmusk If Japan can restart idling NPPs why Germany can't? Purely ideological reasons?

Profilbild von Björn Hollensteiner

Björn Hollensteinervor 1 Jahr

@elonmusk The majority of german people agree - but that doesn't bother those who are in charge right now.

Profilbild von smopecakes

smopecakesvor 1 Jahr

@elonmusk While discount rates matter, one could argue that the social discount rate for long lived infrastructure providing a durably required resource should be lower And then...

Profilbild von D10s are a girl's best friend

D10s are a girl's best friendvor 1 Jahr

@elonmusk If only there was a pipeline for natural gas coming into Germany from the east. 🤔 We could call it Northern Stream! That might help alleviate some of this energy crunch....

Profilbild von kai

kaivor 1 Jahr

@elonmusk No it can’t you dipshit. They already started to build it down. But how should you know? No nuclear plant in Germany can be reused and guess what: that’s alright! We don’t need that. Don’t spread fakenews.

Profilbild von Christian

Christianvor 1 Jahr

Our minister of economy @roberthabeck is convinced that nuclear doesnt make sense and lignite coal is much better for the environmental goals of his party. Also nuclear energy is much too expensive according to him. I mean just look at the prices for electricity in Germany. Nowhere in the world you can get it that cheap. He has a PHD in philosophy so he must know.

Profilbild von Jorit Wintjes

Jorit Wintjesvor 1 Jahr

@elonmusk Fun fact: two thirds of the population wanted this. Is the majority vote in a democratic society really "cringe"?

Profilbild von Disteckstoffmonodix

Disteckstoffmonodixvor 1 Jahr

@elonmusk I wouldn't call Isar 2 in good shape. The reactor for example is already separated from the main loop piping. Pumps are being dismantled...

Profilbild von Westsider

Westsidervor 1 Jahr

@elonmusk Good on you @energybantsfor fighting the good fight. Nuclear is the only massively scalable, zero-carbon energy technology available using off-the-shelf. My #geothermal sector could get there someday, but it's not there yet.

Profilbild von FPLBruceWayne

FPLBruceWaynevor 1 Jahr

@elonmusk Why it’s shutdown? These build during sec world war? And shutdown after Hitler’s fall? And not starting due to some treaty with West & US!

Ähnliche Videos

ELON: THE WORLD CAN BE POWERED ENTIRELY BY SOLAR AND BATTERIES “The energy that reaches the Earth from the Sun is staggeringly high. We have this enormous fusion generator in the sky that is lobbing out vast amounts of energy. If you take a nuclear plant, took its current output and compared that to putting solar panels on the area used by the nuclear power plant. The solar panels would typically generate more power than the nuclear power plant.” Source: Elon Musk

ELON: THE WORLD CAN BE POWERED ENTIRELY BY SOLAR AND BATTERIES “The energy that reaches the Earth from the Sun is staggeringly high. We have this enormous fusion generator in the sky that is lobbing out vast amounts of energy. If you take a nuclear plant, took its current output and compared that to putting solar panels on the area used by the nuclear power plant. The solar panels would typically generate more power than the nuclear power plant.” Source: Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

46,577 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON: IT’S TOTAL MADNESS FOR GERMANY TO SHUT DOWN ITS NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS “I think it's very important that Germany does not shut down its nuclear power stations. I think this is extremely crazy. I want to be super clear: In my opinion, Germany should not only not shut down the nuclear power plants, it should reopen the ones that were shut down. Those are the fastest ones to restart. It's crazy to shut down nuclear power plants, especially if you're in a place where there's no natural disasters. Maybe, if you're somewhere where there are severe earthquakes or tsunamis or something like that, it's more of a question mark. But if there's no massive natural disaster risk, which Germany does not have, then there's really no danger with nuclear power plants. I can't emphasize enough: Please, do not shut down the nuclear power plants. And please, reopen the ones that have been shut. This is total madness to shut them down, I want to be clear. I would say this is a national security risk. Listen: Playtime is over, okay? Obviously, playtime is over. I think people don't understand: Coal power plants, because of their emissions, cause a certain number of deaths every year. It's far more dangerous than nuclear power plants.” Source: Welt, April 2022

ELON: IT’S TOTAL MADNESS FOR GERMANY TO SHUT DOWN ITS NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS “I think it's very important that Germany does not shut down its nuclear power stations. I think this is extremely crazy. I want to be super clear: In my opinion, Germany should not only not shut down the nuclear power plants, it should reopen the ones that were shut down. Those are the fastest ones to restart. It's crazy to shut down nuclear power plants, especially if you're in a place where there's no natural disasters. Maybe, if you're somewhere where there are severe earthquakes or tsunamis or something like that, it's more of a question mark. But if there's no massive natural disaster risk, which Germany does not have, then there's really no danger with nuclear power plants. I can't emphasize enough: Please, do not shut down the nuclear power plants. And please, reopen the ones that have been shut. This is total madness to shut them down, I want to be clear. I would say this is a national security risk. Listen: Playtime is over, okay? Obviously, playtime is over. I think people don't understand: Coal power plants, because of their emissions, cause a certain number of deaths every year. It's far more dangerous than nuclear power plants.” Source: Welt, April 2022

Mario Nawfal

48,254 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Elon Musk warned them three years ago. Today the German government is finally admitting he was right Chancellor Friedrich Merz has officially labeled the decision to shut down Germany’s nuclear plants a 'huge mistake,' confessing that the move has crippled the economy and left the country with the most expensive energy transition in the world (What Elon warned 3 years ago:) I think it's very important that Germany not shut down its nuclear power stations? I think this is extremely crazy I want to be super clear. My opinion is Germany should not only not shut down the nuclear power plants, it should reopen the ones that shut down. Those are the fastest ones to restart. It's crazy to shut down nuclear power plants Especially if you're in a place where there are no natural disasters. If you're somewhere with severe earthquakes or tsunamis, it's more of a question mark But if there's not a massive natural disaster risk which Germany does not have then there's really no danger with the nuclear power plants

Elon Musk warned them three years ago. Today the German government is finally admitting he was right Chancellor Friedrich Merz has officially labeled the decision to shut down Germany’s nuclear plants a 'huge mistake,' confessing that the move has crippled the economy and left the country with the most expensive energy transition in the world (What Elon warned 3 years ago:) I think it's very important that Germany not shut down its nuclear power stations? I think this is extremely crazy I want to be super clear. My opinion is Germany should not only not shut down the nuclear power plants, it should reopen the ones that shut down. Those are the fastest ones to restart. It's crazy to shut down nuclear power plants Especially if you're in a place where there are no natural disasters. If you're somewhere with severe earthquakes or tsunamis, it's more of a question mark But if there's not a massive natural disaster risk which Germany does not have then there's really no danger with the nuclear power plants

X Freeze

596,599 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Hungary's only nuclear power plant, which powers half of the country, is on the verge of totally shutting down. The Danube River is hitting record lows because of a drought that's been going on for more than three months. On a normal day, the Paks Power Plant needs to suck up almost 3,500 Olympic pools of water from the Danube each day to cool its four reactors. CBS News' Ramy Inocencio is in Hungary, exploring how the heat wave in Europe is impacting this and other power plants.

Hungary's only nuclear power plant, which powers half of the country, is on the verge of totally shutting down. The Danube River is hitting record lows because of a drought that's been going on for more than three months. On a normal day, the Paks Power Plant needs to suck up almost 3,500 Olympic pools of water from the Danube each day to cool its four reactors. CBS News' Ramy Inocencio is in Hungary, exploring how the heat wave in Europe is impacting this and other power plants.

CBS News

41,698 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Elon Musk in 2022: It's extremely crazy for Germany to close its nuclear power stations. “I think it's very important that Germany not shut down its nuclear power stations. I think this is extremely crazy. I want to be super clear. In my opinion, Germany should not only not shut down the nuclear power plants, it should reopen the ones that shut down, and those are the fastest ones to restart. It's crazy to shut down nuclear power plants now, especially if you're in a place where there's not natural disasters. So if you're maybe somewhere where there's severe earthquakes or tsunamis or something like that, it's more of a question mark. I mean, maybe, but if there's not massive natural disaster risk which Germany does not have, then there's really no danger with the nuclear power plants.” From: Welt Interview, April 15, 2022

Elon Musk in 2022: It's extremely crazy for Germany to close its nuclear power stations. “I think it's very important that Germany not shut down its nuclear power stations. I think this is extremely crazy. I want to be super clear. In my opinion, Germany should not only not shut down the nuclear power plants, it should reopen the ones that shut down, and those are the fastest ones to restart. It's crazy to shut down nuclear power plants now, especially if you're in a place where there's not natural disasters. So if you're maybe somewhere where there's severe earthquakes or tsunamis or something like that, it's more of a question mark. I mean, maybe, but if there's not massive natural disaster risk which Germany does not have, then there's really no danger with the nuclear power plants.” From: Welt Interview, April 15, 2022

ELON CLIPS

27,246 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

As AI drives unprecedented demand for electricity, nuclear startup Aalo Atomics is rethinking how reactors are built. The company is developing factory-manufactured reactors designed to deploy faster and scale more efficiently than traditional nuclear plants. Co-founder Yasir Arafat explains how speed in one of the world’s most regulated industries comes down to mastering the fundamentals, working with regulators, and iterating relentlessly.

As AI drives unprecedented demand for electricity, nuclear startup Aalo Atomics is rethinking how reactors are built. The company is developing factory-manufactured reactors designed to deploy faster and scale more efficiently than traditional nuclear plants. Co-founder Yasir Arafat explains how speed in one of the world’s most regulated industries comes down to mastering the fundamentals, working with regulators, and iterating relentlessly.

Forbes

27,214 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

EU's von der Leyen admits: While in 1990, one third of Europe's electricity came from nuclear, today it's only close to 15%. This reduction in the share of nuclear was a choice. And in hindsight, it was a strategic mistake for Europe to turn its back on a reliable, affordable source of low-emission power.

EU's von der Leyen admits: While in 1990, one third of Europe's electricity came from nuclear, today it's only close to 15%. This reduction in the share of nuclear was a choice. And in hindsight, it was a strategic mistake for Europe to turn its back on a reliable, affordable source of low-emission power.

Clash Report

116,707 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇩🇪EXCLUSIVE - ALICE WEIDEL: “THEY DESTROYED OUR POWER PLANTS, SO WE CAN NEVER BRING THEM BACK” AfD Leader, Alice Weidel: "Germany had the most modern nuclear power plants, coal plants, and they put explosives in it and just destroyed them. This ideology, like the greenish ideology, started by our chancellor, Angela Merkel. We are the only industrial country with no proper energy supply."

🇩🇪EXCLUSIVE - ALICE WEIDEL: “THEY DESTROYED OUR POWER PLANTS, SO WE CAN NEVER BRING THEM BACK” AfD Leader, Alice Weidel: "Germany had the most modern nuclear power plants, coal plants, and they put explosives in it and just destroyed them. This ideology, like the greenish ideology, started by our chancellor, Angela Merkel. We are the only industrial country with no proper energy supply."

Mario Nawfal

102,609 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We need more access to energy. The best path to increasing nuclear energy production in the US in next 5 years is just making the current large plants more efficient. Isabelle Boemeke isabelle 🪐 breaks down current landscape so well. Companies raising billions but no working prototypes yet, and new large plant projects are too expensive for most utility companies to take on.

We need more access to energy. The best path to increasing nuclear energy production in the US in next 5 years is just making the current large plants more efficient. Isabelle Boemeke isabelle 🪐 breaks down current landscape so well. Companies raising billions but no working prototypes yet, and new large plant projects are too expensive for most utility companies to take on.

Sabrina Halper

20,157 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Would you look at this. It turns out the future isn’t wind and solar, It’s nuclear power Happening Now: Construction on 3 Nuclear Power Plants has begun to meet Google’s net zero company goals after demands for more power increased with ai “Oak Ridge, Tennessee, they're building three phases of experimental nuclear power plants here. These are called SMRs. Small modular reactors, smaller, cheaper, and safer than traditional power plants. Instead of fuel rods, they use these fuel pebbles. Cut it in half and you can see the simulated specs of uranium in there. These contain the byproducts. The client for all this is Google. Google's trying to reach its goals of being a net zero company, so they need a lot more clean power now that they're using all this AI stuff. So this company called Kairos Power is gonna build them with luck by 2030, a fleet of small modular reactors for clean, safe nuclear power forever.”

Would you look at this. It turns out the future isn’t wind and solar, It’s nuclear power Happening Now: Construction on 3 Nuclear Power Plants has begun to meet Google’s net zero company goals after demands for more power increased with ai “Oak Ridge, Tennessee, they're building three phases of experimental nuclear power plants here. These are called SMRs. Small modular reactors, smaller, cheaper, and safer than traditional power plants. Instead of fuel rods, they use these fuel pebbles. Cut it in half and you can see the simulated specs of uranium in there. These contain the byproducts. The client for all this is Google. Google's trying to reach its goals of being a net zero company, so they need a lot more clean power now that they're using all this AI stuff. So this company called Kairos Power is gonna build them with luck by 2030, a fleet of small modular reactors for clean, safe nuclear power forever.”

Wall Street Apes

156,172 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

EU's Ursula von der Leyen states: “While in 1990, one third of Europe's electricity came from nuclear power, today it is only close to 15%. This reduction in the share of nuclear power was a choice. And in hindsight, it was a strategic mistake for Europe to turn its back on a reliable, economically affordable low-emission energy source.” Are you kidding me?! It was the globalist psychopaths like her, pushing Agenda 2030 that closed the nuclear stations! And she has the audacity to just say… oooops! It was a mistake.

EU's Ursula von der Leyen states: “While in 1990, one third of Europe's electricity came from nuclear power, today it is only close to 15%. This reduction in the share of nuclear power was a choice. And in hindsight, it was a strategic mistake for Europe to turn its back on a reliable, economically affordable low-emission energy source.” Are you kidding me?! It was the globalist psychopaths like her, pushing Agenda 2030 that closed the nuclear stations! And she has the audacity to just say… oooops! It was a mistake.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

11,485 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🇮🇷☢️| Imam Khamenei on Nuclear Weapons & 60% HEU “Today, we are at a high level in uranium enrichment. Of course, countries that want to build nuclear weapons raise enrichment to 90% purity. Since we have no need for weapons and have decided against nuclear arms, we have not gone that far. We raised enrichment to 60%, which is very high, a very good figure, and necessary for some of our domestic needs. We have managed to advance this far. Out of more than 200 countries in the world, only 10 have this capability, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is one of them. The other 9 countries all possess nuclear bombs. We are the only one without a nuclear weapon — and we will not have one, since we do not intend to use nuclear weapons. But we do have enrichment and will keep using it. Among these 10 countries, we are considered one of the leaders in this industry. And, as I said, the scientists who laid the foundation for this work not only advanced it greatly but, more importantly, trained many people in this field. Today, in our country there are dozens of distinguished scientists and professors — this is a verified and reliable report given to us by those directly involved — as well as hundreds of researchers and thousands trained in nuclear-related fields who are active right now. Now, they (the enemy) have bombed such and such facilities. That’s an issue. But knowledge cannot be destroyed. Knowledge cannot be wiped out with bombs, threats, or such things. It remains forever.

🇮🇷☢️| Imam Khamenei on Nuclear Weapons & 60% HEU “Today, we are at a high level in uranium enrichment. Of course, countries that want to build nuclear weapons raise enrichment to 90% purity. Since we have no need for weapons and have decided against nuclear arms, we have not gone that far. We raised enrichment to 60%, which is very high, a very good figure, and necessary for some of our domestic needs. We have managed to advance this far. Out of more than 200 countries in the world, only 10 have this capability, and the Islamic Republic of Iran is one of them. The other 9 countries all possess nuclear bombs. We are the only one without a nuclear weapon — and we will not have one, since we do not intend to use nuclear weapons. But we do have enrichment and will keep using it. Among these 10 countries, we are considered one of the leaders in this industry. And, as I said, the scientists who laid the foundation for this work not only advanced it greatly but, more importantly, trained many people in this field. Today, in our country there are dozens of distinguished scientists and professors — this is a verified and reliable report given to us by those directly involved — as well as hundreds of researchers and thousands trained in nuclear-related fields who are active right now. Now, they (the enemy) have bombed such and such facilities. That’s an issue. But knowledge cannot be destroyed. Knowledge cannot be wiped out with bombs, threats, or such things. It remains forever.

Arya - آریا

12,340 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The Earth’s surface area is covered with more plant life today than 50 years ago - because, yes, carbon is plant food and surface temperatures are a little higher. I’m pro-environment. Clean air. Clean water. Preserving national parks. Ironically these things are put on the back burner in a world where our only focus is the climate cult itself.

The Earth’s surface area is covered with more plant life today than 50 years ago - because, yes, carbon is plant food and surface temperatures are a little higher. I’m pro-environment. Clean air. Clean water. Preserving national parks. Ironically these things are put on the back burner in a world where our only focus is the climate cult itself.

Vivek Ramaswamy

4,090,123 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

IAEA. Grossi: Only a nuclear strike can destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities. I have credible information that the US and Israel intend to strike the Bushehr nuclear power plant. The goal is to shock Iran and force it to negotiate, and, in the wake of this shock, attempt to land forces on part of the country. Iran's leadership has less than 24 hours to strike Israel in a way that will dissuade the US from taking these actions. ✅ khayalpressa313

IAEA. Grossi: Only a nuclear strike can destroy Iran's nuclear capabilities. I have credible information that the US and Israel intend to strike the Bushehr nuclear power plant. The goal is to shock Iran and force it to negotiate, and, in the wake of this shock, attempt to land forces on part of the country. Iran's leadership has less than 24 hours to strike Israel in a way that will dissuade the US from taking these actions. ✅ khayalpressa313

Victor vicktop55 commentary

24,533 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

We believe that there’s no future without nuclear energy. We support the goal of tripling nuclear energy capacity by 2050 to get to net-zero emissions. However, we can’t achieve this goal without addressing these two things: 1 - 𝗔𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲-𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀: Over and over again we’ve witnessed a troubling pattern: when nuclear power plants are shut down, they’re replaced by fossil fuels. This transition not only makes governments more reliant on polluting energy imports, but also makes it lot harder to reduce our greenhouse gas emission. Given the urgency of the climate and energy crisis we face today, both of these outcomes are unacceptable. For these reasons we strongly condemn nuclear energy phase-outs and instead advocate for countries to extend the life of their existing nuclear reactors. By doing so, nations can decrease their dependence on fossil fuels, maintain a more sustainable energy mix, and make substantial progress towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 2 - 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁: The WorldBank extends grants for low and middle-income countries to fund various initiatives, including clean energy projects. The last time it approved a nuclear energy project was six decades ago. Since then, the World Bank and other multilateral development banks have completely stopped supporting nuclear power. Not only do they refuse to provide financial support, they also refrain from offering any strategic planning guidance to countries looking to build nuclear power plants. It’s a de facto ban on nuclear energy, since these projects tend to be expensive and beyond the means of low to middle-income countries. We urge the World Bank and other similar financing institutions to update their stance on this matter and hire the necessary staff to assess nuclear energy projects. Me, Stand Up for Nuclear and WePlanet joined forces ahead of the first every nuclear energy summit held in Brussels, to make our voices heard through art. We’re ready to turn the world Inside Out and step into our clean energy future! Let’s go ⚡️ Learn more at:

We believe that there’s no future without nuclear energy. We support the goal of tripling nuclear energy capacity by 2050 to get to net-zero emissions. However, we can’t achieve this goal without addressing these two things: 1 - 𝗔𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲-𝗼𝘂𝘁𝘀: Over and over again we’ve witnessed a troubling pattern: when nuclear power plants are shut down, they’re replaced by fossil fuels. This transition not only makes governments more reliant on polluting energy imports, but also makes it lot harder to reduce our greenhouse gas emission. Given the urgency of the climate and energy crisis we face today, both of these outcomes are unacceptable. For these reasons we strongly condemn nuclear energy phase-outs and instead advocate for countries to extend the life of their existing nuclear reactors. By doing so, nations can decrease their dependence on fossil fuels, maintain a more sustainable energy mix, and make substantial progress towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 2 - 𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗹𝗱 𝗕𝗮𝗻𝗸 𝗦𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁: The WorldBank extends grants for low and middle-income countries to fund various initiatives, including clean energy projects. The last time it approved a nuclear energy project was six decades ago. Since then, the World Bank and other multilateral development banks have completely stopped supporting nuclear power. Not only do they refuse to provide financial support, they also refrain from offering any strategic planning guidance to countries looking to build nuclear power plants. It’s a de facto ban on nuclear energy, since these projects tend to be expensive and beyond the means of low to middle-income countries. We urge the World Bank and other similar financing institutions to update their stance on this matter and hire the necessary staff to assess nuclear energy projects. Me, Stand Up for Nuclear and WePlanet joined forces ahead of the first every nuclear energy summit held in Brussels, to make our voices heard through art. We’re ready to turn the world Inside Out and step into our clean energy future! Let’s go ⚡️ Learn more at:

isabelle 🪐

109,438 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Having nuclear weapons is one thing. Surviving a nuclear attack and still being able to strike back is what defines a true nuclear superpower. Reports claim Pakistan asked China in 2024 for help building a sea-based nuclear deterrent, the most survivable form of nuclear capability. According to reports, China rejected Pakistan’s request and called the demand “unreasonable.” Today, only a handful of countries possess an operational sea-based nuclear deterrent: the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, and India. India achieved this capability through its Arihant-class submarine programme, completing its nuclear triad with land, air, and sea-based nuclear forces. Pakistan’s reported push highlights how modern nuclear competition is no longer just about missiles on land — it is increasingly about what survives beneath the ocean. #China #Nuclear #submarine #Pakistan #indianarmy #NuclearSubmarine

Having nuclear weapons is one thing. Surviving a nuclear attack and still being able to strike back is what defines a true nuclear superpower. Reports claim Pakistan asked China in 2024 for help building a sea-based nuclear deterrent, the most survivable form of nuclear capability. According to reports, China rejected Pakistan’s request and called the demand “unreasonable.” Today, only a handful of countries possess an operational sea-based nuclear deterrent: the United States, Russia, China, France, the United Kingdom, and India. India achieved this capability through its Arihant-class submarine programme, completing its nuclear triad with land, air, and sea-based nuclear forces. Pakistan’s reported push highlights how modern nuclear competition is no longer just about missiles on land — it is increasingly about what survives beneath the ocean. #China #Nuclear #submarine #Pakistan #indianarmy #NuclearSubmarine

Srijan Pal Singh

13,047 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🇺🇸 ENERGY SEC. WRIGHT: WIND AND SOLAR CAN’T REPLACE RELIABLE ENERGY "The problem with wind is that the wind doesn't always blow. If the wind is blowing, you can say it's powered by wind power, then the wind stops or the wind gets weaker. Something has to fill that gap in always be there. So when you add wind and solar onto a grid, you don't remove the need for coal plants, for nuclear plants, for natural gas plants, that work all the time. So to maintain two grids instead of one grid is always more expensive." Source: Fox News

🇺🇸 ENERGY SEC. WRIGHT: WIND AND SOLAR CAN’T REPLACE RELIABLE ENERGY "The problem with wind is that the wind doesn't always blow. If the wind is blowing, you can say it's powered by wind power, then the wind stops or the wind gets weaker. Something has to fill that gap in always be there. So when you add wind and solar onto a grid, you don't remove the need for coal plants, for nuclear plants, for natural gas plants, that work all the time. So to maintain two grids instead of one grid is always more expensive." Source: Fox News

Mario Nawfal

208,235 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Trump: Elon Musk has done a great job. Look at all the fraud he has found in this USAID. It is a disaster, radical left lunatics. They have things that no one would even believe. The whole thing with 100 million spent on you know what. I’d like to see what the kickbacks are.

Trump: Elon Musk has done a great job. Look at all the fraud he has found in this USAID. It is a disaster, radical left lunatics. They have things that no one would even believe. The whole thing with 100 million spent on you know what. I’d like to see what the kickbacks are.

unusual_whales

485,812 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr