正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🚨 Elon Musk testified today that AI could surpass human intelligence next year and could kill us. And the person in charge of it is not trustworthy. Elon Musk in the trial: "I came up with the idea, the name, recruited the key people, and provided all the initial...

BullTheoryio's profile picture

Bull Theory

215,572 subscribers

740,357 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Update from the court case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Elon Musk testified in court saying that “AI could kill us all, and we could be heading towards a Terminator-style outcome” This is why we can’t have a Woke AI The judge is is saying no one should be posting about the cast on social media
1:01

Update from the court case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Elon Musk testified in court saying that “AI could kill us all, and we could be heading towards a Terminator-style outcome” This is why we can’t have a Woke AI The judge is is saying no one should be posting about the cast on social media

Wall Street Apes

49,411 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk: "I don't trust OpenAI and Sam Altman. I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy"
0:40

Elon Musk: "I don't trust OpenAI and Sam Altman. I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy"

SMX 🇺🇸

187,307 次观看 • 9 个月前

Elon Musk: "I don't trust OpenAI and Sam Altman. I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy."
0:40

Elon Musk: "I don't trust OpenAI and Sam Altman. I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

41,254 次观看 • 2 个月前

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk
0:31

🚨 ELON MUSK IS DESTROYING OPENAI IN COURT Today is his FINAL day of testimony in the OpenAI trial, and Elon is going off, saying they BETRAYED the nonprofit mission ELON: "[I] was a FOOL" for giving OpenAI and Altman $38 million in funding that was then used to create the $800 billion company "Musk co-founded OpenAI with current CEO Sam Altman in 2015. He alleges the company went back on their commitments to preserve the AI lab's non-profit structure." Elon Musk

Eric Daugherty

701,915 次观看 • 3 个月前

"I don't trust OpenAI and Sam Altman. I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy." 一 Elon Musk
0:59

"I don't trust OpenAI and Sam Altman. I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy." 一 Elon Musk

DogeDesigner

11,262,562 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: “I don’t trust OpenAI. I don’t trust Sam Altman and I don’t think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.”
0:23

Elon Musk: “I don’t trust OpenAI. I don’t trust Sam Altman and I don’t think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.”

Ian Miles Cheong

100,916 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon is suing OpenAI for $150 billion. On the stand today he said: "If we make it okay to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed." OpenAI went from a nonprofit in someone's apartment to an $850 billion company. The people who built it are now billionaires. The charity that was supposed to own it holds 26%. It doesn't matter if you think Elon Musk is a hypocrite or a hero. That math is hard to explain. Source: Reuters
2:43

Elon is suing OpenAI for $150 billion. On the stand today he said: "If we make it okay to loot a charity, the entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed." OpenAI went from a nonprofit in someone's apartment to an $850 billion company. The people who built it are now billionaires. The charity that was supposed to own it holds 26%. It doesn't matter if you think Elon Musk is a hypocrite or a hero. That math is hard to explain. Source: Reuters

Mario Nawfal

465,536 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk is on the witness stand in Oakland right now telling a jury how Sam Altman stole a charity. Not a company. Not a venture. A charity. The founding documents are entered into evidence. It started with a conversation. Google co-founder Larry Page called Musk a “speciesist” for favoring humanity over computers. At his own birthday party. In front of a crowd. One of the most powerful technologists on the planet told the man beside him that caring more about human survival than machines was a character flaw. Musk walked away from that conversation and asked one question. What is the exact opposite of Google? Musk: “It would be an open-source non-profit. And that is where the word ‘open’ in OpenAI comes from.” He funded it. Named it. Recruited the researchers. Brought in Ilya Sutskever. Personally brokered the original Microsoft Azure deal with Satya Nadella. Musk: “I came up with the idea, the name, recruited the key people, taught them everything I know, provided all the initial funding.” $38 million of his own money. Into a structure designed to prevent any single person from profiting off the most dangerous technology ever built. The founding charter is now sitting in front of a federal jury. It says OpenAI was created to build “open source technology for the public benefit” and was “not organized for the private gain of any person.” Then they offered Musk shares. He turned them down. Musk: “Non-profits are not supposed to have shares. It did not seem morally or legally defensible.” The man who built it refused the money because the mission was never supposed to make anyone rich. Then something changed. Sam Altman took that structure and converted it into a for-profit subsidiary. Attracted a $10 billion Microsoft investment. And built what is now approaching a trillion-dollar company on top of $38 million in charitable donations. When Musk found out about the Microsoft deal, he texted Altman directly. Musk: “I said, ‘What the hell is going on?’ I think I said, ‘This is a bait and switch.’” The media frames this as a billionaire grudge match. Two egos fighting over territory. That framing is a lie designed to make you look away from the documents. This is not a dispute over equity. Musk is not asking for money back. He is asking the court to return every dollar to the nonprofit foundation. $130 billion in damages. Altman and Brockman removed from their positions. The entire for-profit conversion unwound. He wants the charity restored because it was never supposed to be anything else. Then from the stand, one line. Musk: “I was a fool. I gave them free funding to create a startup.” $38 million donated to protect the species. Turned into an $800 billion vehicle for private enrichment. The most sophisticated theft of charitable intent in American corporate history. And if this conversion stands, it sets the precedent for every nonprofit that comes after it. Every donor who writes a check believing a charter means something. Every mission statement drafted to protect the public instead of enrich the founders. If you can collect tax-exempt donations, build the most valuable technology on Earth, and hand the returns to private shareholders, then the nonprofit structure is not a safeguard. It is a startup incubator for anyone willing to rewrite the paperwork. And the question no one in that courtroom is asking. If the people handed the tools to protect humanity used them to enrich themselves instead, what does that tell you about what happens when the technology actually arrives? The charter said for the benefit of all. The cap table says for the benefit of Sam Altman.
1:50

Elon Musk is on the witness stand in Oakland right now telling a jury how Sam Altman stole a charity. Not a company. Not a venture. A charity. The founding documents are entered into evidence. It started with a conversation. Google co-founder Larry Page called Musk a “speciesist” for favoring humanity over computers. At his own birthday party. In front of a crowd. One of the most powerful technologists on the planet told the man beside him that caring more about human survival than machines was a character flaw. Musk walked away from that conversation and asked one question. What is the exact opposite of Google? Musk: “It would be an open-source non-profit. And that is where the word ‘open’ in OpenAI comes from.” He funded it. Named it. Recruited the researchers. Brought in Ilya Sutskever. Personally brokered the original Microsoft Azure deal with Satya Nadella. Musk: “I came up with the idea, the name, recruited the key people, taught them everything I know, provided all the initial funding.” $38 million of his own money. Into a structure designed to prevent any single person from profiting off the most dangerous technology ever built. The founding charter is now sitting in front of a federal jury. It says OpenAI was created to build “open source technology for the public benefit” and was “not organized for the private gain of any person.” Then they offered Musk shares. He turned them down. Musk: “Non-profits are not supposed to have shares. It did not seem morally or legally defensible.” The man who built it refused the money because the mission was never supposed to make anyone rich. Then something changed. Sam Altman took that structure and converted it into a for-profit subsidiary. Attracted a $10 billion Microsoft investment. And built what is now approaching a trillion-dollar company on top of $38 million in charitable donations. When Musk found out about the Microsoft deal, he texted Altman directly. Musk: “I said, ‘What the hell is going on?’ I think I said, ‘This is a bait and switch.’” The media frames this as a billionaire grudge match. Two egos fighting over territory. That framing is a lie designed to make you look away from the documents. This is not a dispute over equity. Musk is not asking for money back. He is asking the court to return every dollar to the nonprofit foundation. $130 billion in damages. Altman and Brockman removed from their positions. The entire for-profit conversion unwound. He wants the charity restored because it was never supposed to be anything else. Then from the stand, one line. Musk: “I was a fool. I gave them free funding to create a startup.” $38 million donated to protect the species. Turned into an $800 billion vehicle for private enrichment. The most sophisticated theft of charitable intent in American corporate history. And if this conversion stands, it sets the precedent for every nonprofit that comes after it. Every donor who writes a check believing a charter means something. Every mission statement drafted to protect the public instead of enrich the founders. If you can collect tax-exempt donations, build the most valuable technology on Earth, and hand the returns to private shareholders, then the nonprofit structure is not a safeguard. It is a startup incubator for anyone willing to rewrite the paperwork. And the question no one in that courtroom is asking. If the people handed the tools to protect humanity used them to enrich themselves instead, what does that tell you about what happens when the technology actually arrives? The charter said for the benefit of all. The cap table says for the benefit of Sam Altman.

Dustin

58,389 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk sat next to Sam Altman in 2016 and praised the nonprofit they built to keep AI out of the hands of a few. Altman ran the camera. He asked how the 6-month-old company was going. Musk called it a talented team. A 501c3. A charity to democratize AI "so it doesn't get concentrated in the hands of a few." That was the whole pitch. Keep it open. Keep it shared. Keep it out of any single grip. 10 years later, that charity is worth over $800B and filing for a $1T IPO. The nonprofit grew a for-profit arm. Microsoft took a stake. Altman ran all of it. In 2024, Musk sued for $150B . He wanted Altman removed and the structure torn down for breaking the exact promise he watched him make on camera. On May 18, 2026, a jury threw it out in under 2 hours. Filed too late, they ruled. Now he calls him "Scam Altman." 3 days ago Apple sued OpenAI. Musk piled on. Altman's reply: the surest sign his model is winning is that Elon is obsessed with him again. 2 co-founders. 1 charity. 11 years. They filmed the whole thing themselves.
19:32

Elon Musk sat next to Sam Altman in 2016 and praised the nonprofit they built to keep AI out of the hands of a few. Altman ran the camera. He asked how the 6-month-old company was going. Musk called it a talented team. A 501c3. A charity to democratize AI "so it doesn't get concentrated in the hands of a few." That was the whole pitch. Keep it open. Keep it shared. Keep it out of any single grip. 10 years later, that charity is worth over $800B and filing for a $1T IPO. The nonprofit grew a for-profit arm. Microsoft took a stake. Altman ran all of it. In 2024, Musk sued for $150B . He wanted Altman removed and the structure torn down for breaking the exact promise he watched him make on camera. On May 18, 2026, a jury threw it out in under 2 hours. Filed too late, they ruled. Now he calls him "Scam Altman." 3 days ago Apple sued OpenAI. Musk piled on. Altman's reply: the surest sign his model is winning is that Elon is obsessed with him again. 2 co-founders. 1 charity. 11 years. They filmed the whole thing themselves.

Veltrx

65,138 次观看 • 27 天前

The case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman starts TODAY Jury selection begins today Monday, April 27 in federal court in Oakland, California Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman for betraying the original mission of OpenAi being a nonprofit after providing 60% of the seed funding to begin the company “The two were founding co-chairs of OpenAI years ago. Musk says he gave OpenAI $38 million during its early years, or what he says was 60% of the non-profit's seed funding. Now Musk, who also runs the AI startup called XAI Claims. Altman and others took his money and betrayed OpenAI's original non-profit status. In October, OpenAI finished restructuring with the for-profit organization reporting into a non-profit foundation” “But Altman's side says Musk agreed with them years ago about the need to convert OpenAI into a for-profit company” (VERY likely a lie) Scam Altman went from nonprofit to -> maximum profit Opening arguments are expected to begin tomorrow
2:06

The case of Elon Musk vs OpenAI CEO Sam Altman starts TODAY Jury selection begins today Monday, April 27 in federal court in Oakland, California Elon Musk is suing Sam Altman for betraying the original mission of OpenAi being a nonprofit after providing 60% of the seed funding to begin the company “The two were founding co-chairs of OpenAI years ago. Musk says he gave OpenAI $38 million during its early years, or what he says was 60% of the non-profit's seed funding. Now Musk, who also runs the AI startup called XAI Claims. Altman and others took his money and betrayed OpenAI's original non-profit status. In October, OpenAI finished restructuring with the for-profit organization reporting into a non-profit foundation” “But Altman's side says Musk agreed with them years ago about the need to convert OpenAI into a for-profit company” (VERY likely a lie) Scam Altman went from nonprofit to -> maximum profit Opening arguments are expected to begin tomorrow

Wall Street Apes

19,516 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."
1:25

Elon Musk on Sam Altman: "I'm not a fan of Sam Altman because if you started a non-profit that was meant to be an open source AI company and it somehow got turned into an 800 billion dollar for-profit company with closed source, I think you'd be like, well, wait a second, that's the exact opposite of what I donated the money for. That's my issue. I think it's a legitimate one. And then Dario, I think, also is not a fan of Sam Altman because he felt, in fact, the reason the Anthropic team left OpenAI is because they didn't trust Sam Altman. Otherwise Anthropic wouldn't exist. They would still be at OpenAI. But at the end of the day, if we have to talk, we'll talk.I mean, set aside our personal differences for the good of the world."

DogeDesigner

240,039 次观看 • 17 天前

26-year old OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji, who accused the company of violating copyright law, has been found dead in an apparent suicide. Below is a screenshot of his last post on X. Elon Musk on OpenAI: “I don't trust OpenAI. I started OpenAI as a non-profit open source. I named the company. It used to be open source but now it is extremely closed source and maximally profit.” “I don't trust Sam Altman and I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.”
1:10

26-year old OpenAI whistleblower Suchir Balaji, who accused the company of violating copyright law, has been found dead in an apparent suicide. Below is a screenshot of his last post on X. Elon Musk on OpenAI: “I don't trust OpenAI. I started OpenAI as a non-profit open source. I named the company. It used to be open source but now it is extremely closed source and maximally profit.” “I don't trust Sam Altman and I don't think we want to have the most powerful AI in the world controlled by someone who is not trustworthy.”

J Stewart

52,067 次观看 • 1 年前

WATCH: Tucker Carlson asks Sam Altman about his rift with Elon Musk—and Altman ADMITS Musk helped to get OpenAI off the ground. Altman is now claiming that Elon Musk walked away after deciding the company was doomed. “He kinda told us we had a 0% chance of success.” Then Altman took a swipe at Musk’s new AI venture...calling Grok a “competitive kind of clone.” But Grok is quickly outpacing GPT in several important verticals, such as speed, search power and real-time information retrieval.
1:21

WATCH: Tucker Carlson asks Sam Altman about his rift with Elon Musk—and Altman ADMITS Musk helped to get OpenAI off the ground. Altman is now claiming that Elon Musk walked away after deciding the company was doomed. “He kinda told us we had a 0% chance of success.” Then Altman took a swipe at Musk’s new AI venture...calling Grok a “competitive kind of clone.” But Grok is quickly outpacing GPT in several important verticals, such as speed, search power and real-time information retrieval.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

68,554 次观看 • 11 个月前

Scott Galloway says the man who made Elon Musk pay $44 billion for Twitter is the one person Musk never fights with, and he should run OpenAI. “Keep in mind, this is the guy that shoplifted $44 billion from Elon Musk and forced him to close, and didn’t get into a pissing match with Elon Musk.” “Elon Musk does not shitpost Bret Taylor. Think about it. He had to pay $44 billion for a company that’s now worth three billion. And he’s not out calling Bret Taylor a crook.” “Every investor at OpenAI would have about a seven-day exhale if they announced that Bret Taylor was the new CEO.”
1:34

Scott Galloway says the man who made Elon Musk pay $44 billion for Twitter is the one person Musk never fights with, and he should run OpenAI. “Keep in mind, this is the guy that shoplifted $44 billion from Elon Musk and forced him to close, and didn’t get into a pissing match with Elon Musk.” “Elon Musk does not shitpost Bret Taylor. Think about it. He had to pay $44 billion for a company that’s now worth three billion. And he’s not out calling Bret Taylor a crook.” “Every investor at OpenAI would have about a seven-day exhale if they announced that Bret Taylor was the new CEO.”

ileri 𖣂

179,883 次观看 • 20 天前

Elon Musk provided all the funding in OpenAI in the beginning. He even named the company. It was supposed to be a non profit. Sam Altman inverted the mission of OpenAI from a non-profit, open source AI company to a closed source, maximum-profit AI company. He cannot be trusted.
0:53

Elon Musk provided all the funding in OpenAI in the beginning. He even named the company. It was supposed to be a non profit. Sam Altman inverted the mission of OpenAI from a non-profit, open source AI company to a closed source, maximum-profit AI company. He cannot be trusted.

DogeDesigner

197,209 次观看 • 1 年前

Reed Hastings on Elon Musk "Elon Musk is the bravest, most creative person on the planet. He's done in multiple areas is phenomenal. His style is different But the guy who spent $44 billion. He could have built a mile-long yacht for $44 billion. But that's not good for the planet, so he’s not interested I am 100% convinced that he is trying to help the world in all of his endeavors. He’s trying to help the world with 𝕏 because he believes in free speech and its power for democracy I’m deeply respectful, and I’m amazed that people are so nitpicky on him”
0:58

Reed Hastings on Elon Musk "Elon Musk is the bravest, most creative person on the planet. He's done in multiple areas is phenomenal. His style is different But the guy who spent $44 billion. He could have built a mile-long yacht for $44 billion. But that's not good for the planet, so he’s not interested I am 100% convinced that he is trying to help the world in all of his endeavors. He’s trying to help the world with 𝕏 because he believes in free speech and its power for democracy I’m deeply respectful, and I’m amazed that people are so nitpicky on him”

X Freeze

102,725 次观看 • 6 个月前

Elon Musk said this in 2018. Nobody wrote it down. Musk: “You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money.” Not a classified program. Not a nine-figure defense prototype. Musk: “Just taking the Face ID chip that’s used in cell phones.” That algorithm finds a face in a crowd and threads a machine through it at speed. The drone is smaller now. The recognition is faster. The explosive fits in a closed fist. Musk: “Have them just do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them, and explode.” Every assumption about the price of precision killing was wrong. The monopoly on targeted death belonged to nation-states with billion-dollar programs. That monopoly ended quietly. Without a press release. Musk: “You could do that right now. No new technology is needed.” Most people are still waiting for the announcement. There will not be one. The barrier was never the hardware. It was always the will. The question was never whether it could be built. It was only ever who built it first.
0:28

Elon Musk said this in 2018. Nobody wrote it down. Musk: “You could make a swarm of assassin drones for very little money.” Not a classified program. Not a nine-figure defense prototype. Musk: “Just taking the Face ID chip that’s used in cell phones.” That algorithm finds a face in a crowd and threads a machine through it at speed. The drone is smaller now. The recognition is faster. The explosive fits in a closed fist. Musk: “Have them just do a grid sweep of the building until they find the person they’re looking for, ram into them, and explode.” Every assumption about the price of precision killing was wrong. The monopoly on targeted death belonged to nation-states with billion-dollar programs. That monopoly ended quietly. Without a press release. Musk: “You could do that right now. No new technology is needed.” Most people are still waiting for the announcement. There will not be one. The barrier was never the hardware. It was always the will. The question was never whether it could be built. It was only ever who built it first.

Dustin

225,811 次观看 • 4 个月前

The two most powerful men in AI are in a courtroom right now here’s everything you need to know: 2015: musk and altman co-found OpenAI promise: nonprofit. for humanity. forever. musk invested $38 million 2018: musk tries to take control. altman says no. musk leaves. 2026: OpenAI valued at $852 billion. IPO coming. musk: “scam altman stole a charity. full stop.” altman: “christmas in april 🎄” opening statements happening right now in oakland altman. brockman. satya nadella. all testifying. the judge already told them to stop posting on x this morning they didn’t listen 26 claims. dropped to 2 the future of the most powerful AI company ever built decided by 9 jurors in oakland I’ll be watching
3:11

The two most powerful men in AI are in a courtroom right now here’s everything you need to know: 2015: musk and altman co-found OpenAI promise: nonprofit. for humanity. forever. musk invested $38 million 2018: musk tries to take control. altman says no. musk leaves. 2026: OpenAI valued at $852 billion. IPO coming. musk: “scam altman stole a charity. full stop.” altman: “christmas in april 🎄” opening statements happening right now in oakland altman. brockman. satya nadella. all testifying. the judge already told them to stop posting on x this morning they didn’t listen 26 claims. dropped to 2 the future of the most powerful AI company ever built decided by 9 jurors in oakland I’ll be watching

Mika

22,010 次观看 • 3 个月前

Just Happened! A US jury finds OpenAI CEO Sam Altman not liable to Elon Musk for straying from its charitable mission. "This is the reason given that we're seeing reporting that Musk waited too long to sue." This is a big loss for Elon, and a big win for OpenAI. Competition in the AI space is really starting to heat up. I can only imagine there will be a few big winners.
0:52

Just Happened! A US jury finds OpenAI CEO Sam Altman not liable to Elon Musk for straying from its charitable mission. "This is the reason given that we're seeing reporting that Musk waited too long to sue." This is a big loss for Elon, and a big win for OpenAI. Competition in the AI space is really starting to heat up. I can only imagine there will be a few big winners.

Ed Krassenstein

73,986 次观看 • 2 个月前