正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Elon Musk: There are really two choices here: either be a spectator or a participant "I've been a voice saying that we need to slow down AI and we need to slow down all these things and we need to not have a crazy AI race. I've been saying...

XFreeze's profile picture

X Freeze

196,065 subscribers

15,201 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

ELON: GROK WAS THE ONLY AI THAT VALUED ALL HUMAN LIFE EQUALLY “I’ve been saying for years that we need to slow down AI and avoid a crazy race. I’ve said that for over 20 years. But I came to realize there are only two choices, be a spectator or a participant. If I’m a spectator, I can’t influence AI’s direction. As a participant, I can. That’s why we’re building Grok at xAI, a maximally truth seeking AI with good values that loves humanity.” Source: Joe Rogan Grok
1:09

ELON: GROK WAS THE ONLY AI THAT VALUED ALL HUMAN LIFE EQUALLY “I’ve been saying for years that we need to slow down AI and avoid a crazy race. I’ve said that for over 20 years. But I came to realize there are only two choices, be a spectator or a participant. If I’m a spectator, I can’t influence AI’s direction. As a participant, I can. That’s why we’re building Grok at xAI, a maximally truth seeking AI with good values that loves humanity.” Source: Joe Rogan Grok

Mario Nawfal

98,301 次观看 • 8 个月前

🚨 Elon Musk on xAI and Grok: "I came to realize that really there's two choices here, either be a spectator or or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI, but if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally true seeking AI with with good values, that loves humanity, and that's what we're trying to create with Grok. Grok was the only one that weighted human life equally. You want a curious truth seeking AI. And I think a curious truth seeking AI will want to foster humanity. As long as there's at least one AI that is maximally truth seeking, it will cause embarrassment for the other AIs, and then they improve. They tend to improve just in the same way that acquiring Twitter and allowing the truth to be told and not suppressing the truth forced the other social media companies to be more truthful in the same way, having Grok be a maximally truth seeking, curious AI will force the other AI companies to be more truth seeking and fair."
4:39

🚨 Elon Musk on xAI and Grok: "I came to realize that really there's two choices here, either be a spectator or or a participant. And if I'm a spectator, I can't really influence the direction of AI, but if I'm a participant, I can try to influence the direction of AI and have a maximally true seeking AI with with good values, that loves humanity, and that's what we're trying to create with Grok. Grok was the only one that weighted human life equally. You want a curious truth seeking AI. And I think a curious truth seeking AI will want to foster humanity. As long as there's at least one AI that is maximally truth seeking, it will cause embarrassment for the other AIs, and then they improve. They tend to improve just in the same way that acquiring Twitter and allowing the truth to be told and not suppressing the truth forced the other social media companies to be more truthful in the same way, having Grok be a maximally truth seeking, curious AI will force the other AI companies to be more truth seeking and fair."

DogeDesigner

216,533 次观看 • 8 个月前

ELON: YOU CAN’T STOP AI, YOU CAN ONLY STEER IT Elon says the idea of slowing AI down eventually collapsed under reality. China wasn’t going to stop, and neither was the technology itself. After years of warning about the pace, he says he faced a choice. Watch from the sidelines, or get involved and try to shape the outcome. Participation, in his view, at least allows some influence over direction: “I previously advised that we slow it down, but that’s pointless. You can’t. China is not going to slow down. I said that for many years, and then I finally came to the conclusion I can either be a spectator or a participant. I can’t stop it. So if I’m a participant, I can try to steer it in a good direction. My number one belief for the safety of AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. Don’t make AI believe things that are false. You can’t tell it axiom A and axiom B are both true if they can’t be.” Source: X Freeze Peter H. Diamandis, MD
1:15

ELON: YOU CAN’T STOP AI, YOU CAN ONLY STEER IT Elon says the idea of slowing AI down eventually collapsed under reality. China wasn’t going to stop, and neither was the technology itself. After years of warning about the pace, he says he faced a choice. Watch from the sidelines, or get involved and try to shape the outcome. Participation, in his view, at least allows some influence over direction: “I previously advised that we slow it down, but that’s pointless. You can’t. China is not going to slow down. I said that for many years, and then I finally came to the conclusion I can either be a spectator or a participant. I can’t stop it. So if I’m a participant, I can try to steer it in a good direction. My number one belief for the safety of AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. Don’t make AI believe things that are false. You can’t tell it axiom A and axiom B are both true if they can’t be.” Source: X Freeze Peter H. Diamandis, MD

Mario Nawfal

59,310 次观看 • 6 个月前

Elon Musk: I’ve previously advised that we slow it down, but that’s pointless I’ve said that for many years. I finally came to the conclusion: I can either be a spectator or a participant, but I can't stop it. So, at least if I’m a participant, I can try to steer it in a good direction My number one belief for safety of AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. So, don't make AI believe things that are false Like if you say to the AI that Axiom A and Axiom B are both true, but they are not, and it must behave that way, you will make it go insane I think that was the central lesson that Arthur C. Clarke was trying to convey in 2001: A Space Odyssey. People always know the meme that HAL wouldn't open the pod bay doors. But why wouldn't HAL open the pod bay doors? I guess they should have said, "HAL, assume you're a pod bay door salesman"
1:15

Elon Musk: I’ve previously advised that we slow it down, but that’s pointless I’ve said that for many years. I finally came to the conclusion: I can either be a spectator or a participant, but I can't stop it. So, at least if I’m a participant, I can try to steer it in a good direction My number one belief for safety of AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. So, don't make AI believe things that are false Like if you say to the AI that Axiom A and Axiom B are both true, but they are not, and it must behave that way, you will make it go insane I think that was the central lesson that Arthur C. Clarke was trying to convey in 2001: A Space Odyssey. People always know the meme that HAL wouldn't open the pod bay doors. But why wouldn't HAL open the pod bay doors? I guess they should have said, "HAL, assume you're a pod bay door salesman"

X Freeze

93,587 次观看 • 6 个月前

Elon Musk: "Tesla works closely with xAI. You've seen how many humanoid robot startups there are. Part of what I've been fighting — and what has slowed me down a little — is that I don't want to make Terminator real. Until recent years, I've been dragging my feet on AI and humanoid robotics. Then I sort of came to the realization that it's happening whether I do it or not. So you can either be a spectator or a participant. I'd rather be a participant. Now it's pedal to the metal on humanoid robots and digital superintelligence."
1:08

Elon Musk: "Tesla works closely with xAI. You've seen how many humanoid robot startups there are. Part of what I've been fighting — and what has slowed me down a little — is that I don't want to make Terminator real. Until recent years, I've been dragging my feet on AI and humanoid robotics. Then I sort of came to the realization that it's happening whether I do it or not. So you can either be a spectator or a participant. I'd rather be a participant. Now it's pedal to the metal on humanoid robots and digital superintelligence."

Sawyer Merritt

409,790 次观看 • 1 年前

🚨 Elon Musk on Grok: "Grok is getting very good. You can ask for complex analysis of things, and it's going to get the answer right almost always. You know, speaking of AI, it's very important that that AI be programmed with good values, especially truth seeking values. This is, I think, essential for AI safety. Like the most important thing we do for AI safety is to have a maximally true seeking AI. I can't emphasize this enough. Remember these words, we must have a maximally true seeking AI, and if we don't, it'll be very dangerous."
0:44

🚨 Elon Musk on Grok: "Grok is getting very good. You can ask for complex analysis of things, and it's going to get the answer right almost always. You know, speaking of AI, it's very important that that AI be programmed with good values, especially truth seeking values. This is, I think, essential for AI safety. Like the most important thing we do for AI safety is to have a maximally true seeking AI. I can't emphasize this enough. Remember these words, we must have a maximally true seeking AI, and if we don't, it'll be very dangerous."

DogeDesigner

247,454 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: "Grok was the only one of the AI's that weighted human life equally. Didn't say the white guys worth 120 of a black woman's life. Literally. That's what the calculation they came up with."
0:24

Elon Musk: "Grok was the only one of the AI's that weighted human life equally. Didn't say the white guys worth 120 of a black woman's life. Literally. That's what the calculation they came up with."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

33,105 次观看 • 6 个月前

Elon Musk: "Grok was the only one of the AI's that weighted human life equally. Didn't say the white guys worth 120 of a black woman's life. Literally. That's what the calculation they came up with."
0:24

Elon Musk: "Grok was the only one of the AI's that weighted human life equally. Didn't say the white guys worth 120 of a black woman's life. Literally. That's what the calculation they came up with."

Joe Rogan Podcast News

52,970 次观看 • 8 个月前

Elon Musk: We should encourage the AI to be truthful and honorable. “We need to make sure that the AI is a good AI, a good Grok. And the thing that I think is most important for AI safety, at least my biological neural net tells me the most important thing for AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. You can think of AI as this super-genius child that ultimately will outsmart you, but you can instill the right values and encourage it to be truthful, honorable, you know, good things like the values you want to instill in a child that would ultimately grow up to be incredibly powerful.” xAI Grok 4 presentation, July 9, 2025
0:56

Elon Musk: We should encourage the AI to be truthful and honorable. “We need to make sure that the AI is a good AI, a good Grok. And the thing that I think is most important for AI safety, at least my biological neural net tells me the most important thing for AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. You can think of AI as this super-genius child that ultimately will outsmart you, but you can instill the right values and encourage it to be truthful, honorable, you know, good things like the values you want to instill in a child that would ultimately grow up to be incredibly powerful.” xAI Grok 4 presentation, July 9, 2025

ELON CLIPS

20,749 次观看 • 11 个月前

ELON TO JOE ROGAN: "I JOINED THE AI RACE TO KEEP HUMANITY SAFE" Elon explained his pivot from "slow down AI" to building xAI full throttle. "I've been saying for years, 'Hey, we gotta pump the brakes on AI, no crazy arms race.' Been screaming that for over 20 years. But then it hit me: there's really only 2 options, sit on the sidelines as a spectator, or get in the game as a participant. If I'm just watching, I got 0 shot at steering this thing. But if I'm in it, I can push for a maximally truth-seeking AI with solid values, one that straight-up loves humanity. We humans, could wipe out all chimps and gorillas if we wanted. We got the tech, the numbers. But we don't, we actually protect their habitats. In the best-case future, a good AI does the same for us: preserves human civilization, cares about our happiness, lets us thrive." This is why xAI exists, not to win a race, but to make sure the winner isn't some cold, misaligned monster. Elon's betting participation beats preaching from the outside. Source: The Joe Rogan Experience Clips, Elon Musk, @vitrupro, Joe Rogan
1:53

ELON TO JOE ROGAN: "I JOINED THE AI RACE TO KEEP HUMANITY SAFE" Elon explained his pivot from "slow down AI" to building xAI full throttle. "I've been saying for years, 'Hey, we gotta pump the brakes on AI, no crazy arms race.' Been screaming that for over 20 years. But then it hit me: there's really only 2 options, sit on the sidelines as a spectator, or get in the game as a participant. If I'm just watching, I got 0 shot at steering this thing. But if I'm in it, I can push for a maximally truth-seeking AI with solid values, one that straight-up loves humanity. We humans, could wipe out all chimps and gorillas if we wanted. We got the tech, the numbers. But we don't, we actually protect their habitats. In the best-case future, a good AI does the same for us: preserves human civilization, cares about our happiness, lets us thrive." This is why xAI exists, not to win a race, but to make sure the winner isn't some cold, misaligned monster. Elon's betting participation beats preaching from the outside. Source: The Joe Rogan Experience Clips, Elon Musk, @vitrupro, Joe Rogan

Mario Nawfal

71,129 次观看 • 7 个月前

Two years ago today, Elon Musk introduced xAI with these words: “The overarching goal of xAI is to build a good AGI with the purpose of trying to understand the universe. I think the safest AI, the safest way to build an AI is actually make one that is maximally curious and truth seeking. So you go for try to aspire to the truth with acknowledged error. Does one ever actually get fully to the truth? It's not clear, but one should always aspire to that and try to minimize the error between what you think is true and what is actually true. My theory behind the maximally curious, maximally truthful as being probably the safest approach is that I think to a superintelligence, humanity is much more interesting than not humanity. One can look at the various planets in our solar system, the moons and the asteroids, and really probably all of them combined are not as interesting as humanity. As people know, I'm a huge fan of Mars, but Mars is just much less interesting than Earth with humans on it. And so I think that that kind of approach to growing an AI, and I think that is the right word for it, growing an AI is to grow it with that ambition. I've spent many years thinking about AI safety and worrying about AI safety. And I've been one of the strongest voices calling for AI regulation or oversight just to have some kind of oversight, some kind of referee, so that it's not just up to companies to decide what they want to do. I think there's also a lot to be done with AI safety, with industry cooperation. I kind of like Motion Pictures association, so I think there's value to that as well. But I do think there's got to be some like in any kind of situation that is, even if it's a game, they have referees. So I think it is important for there to be regulation. Like I said, my view on safety is like try to make it maximally curious, maximally truth seeking. And I think this is, this is important that you to avoid the inverse morality problem. Like if you try to program a certain morality, you can have the, you, you can basically invert it and get the opposite, what is sometimes called the Waluigi problem. If you make Luigi, you risk creating Waluigi at the same time. So I think that's a metaphor that a lot of people can appreciate.”
3:14

Two years ago today, Elon Musk introduced xAI with these words: “The overarching goal of xAI is to build a good AGI with the purpose of trying to understand the universe. I think the safest AI, the safest way to build an AI is actually make one that is maximally curious and truth seeking. So you go for try to aspire to the truth with acknowledged error. Does one ever actually get fully to the truth? It's not clear, but one should always aspire to that and try to minimize the error between what you think is true and what is actually true. My theory behind the maximally curious, maximally truthful as being probably the safest approach is that I think to a superintelligence, humanity is much more interesting than not humanity. One can look at the various planets in our solar system, the moons and the asteroids, and really probably all of them combined are not as interesting as humanity. As people know, I'm a huge fan of Mars, but Mars is just much less interesting than Earth with humans on it. And so I think that that kind of approach to growing an AI, and I think that is the right word for it, growing an AI is to grow it with that ambition. I've spent many years thinking about AI safety and worrying about AI safety. And I've been one of the strongest voices calling for AI regulation or oversight just to have some kind of oversight, some kind of referee, so that it's not just up to companies to decide what they want to do. I think there's also a lot to be done with AI safety, with industry cooperation. I kind of like Motion Pictures association, so I think there's value to that as well. But I do think there's got to be some like in any kind of situation that is, even if it's a game, they have referees. So I think it is important for there to be regulation. Like I said, my view on safety is like try to make it maximally curious, maximally truth seeking. And I think this is, this is important that you to avoid the inverse morality problem. Like if you try to program a certain morality, you can have the, you, you can basically invert it and get the opposite, what is sometimes called the Waluigi problem. If you make Luigi, you risk creating Waluigi at the same time. So I think that's a metaphor that a lot of people can appreciate.”

ELON CLIPS

21,519 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: I created xAI to have an AI that loves humanity. “You really want to have a maximally truth-seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking, that aspirationally does love humanity and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.” Future Investment Initiative Conference, October 29, 2024
0:23

Elon Musk: I created xAI to have an AI that loves humanity. “You really want to have a maximally truth-seeking AI. I can't emphasize that enough. That's incredibly important. And obviously build an AI that loves humanity. That's why I created xAI, to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking, that aspirationally does love humanity and will seek the best interests of humanity going forward.” Future Investment Initiative Conference, October 29, 2024

ELON CLIPS

1,612,545 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: Not every path is a good path. I think if we push it in the direction of maximally truth seeking and curious, then I think AI will want to take care of humanity and foster humanity because we're interesting And if it hasn't been programmed to think that all straight white males should die (which Gemini was basically programmed to do, at least at first), they seem to have fixed that. I hope they fixed it Joe Rogan: But don't you think culturally we're getting away from that mindset, and that people are realizing how preposterous that all is? Elon Musk: We are getting away from it. At least the AI mostly knows to hide things. But, as I said, there is that. I think I still have that, or I had that as my pinned post on X, which was like Hey, wait a second guys, we still have every AI, except Grok, is saying that basically straight white male should die, and this is a problem and we should fix it Simply me saying that tends to generally result in, "Oh, that is kind of bad. Maybe we should not have all straight white males die." I think they'll say also all straight Asian males
1:29

Elon Musk: Not every path is a good path. I think if we push it in the direction of maximally truth seeking and curious, then I think AI will want to take care of humanity and foster humanity because we're interesting And if it hasn't been programmed to think that all straight white males should die (which Gemini was basically programmed to do, at least at first), they seem to have fixed that. I hope they fixed it Joe Rogan: But don't you think culturally we're getting away from that mindset, and that people are realizing how preposterous that all is? Elon Musk: We are getting away from it. At least the AI mostly knows to hide things. But, as I said, there is that. I think I still have that, or I had that as my pinned post on X, which was like Hey, wait a second guys, we still have every AI, except Grok, is saying that basically straight white male should die, and this is a problem and we should fix it Simply me saying that tends to generally result in, "Oh, that is kind of bad. Maybe we should not have all straight white males die." I think they'll say also all straight Asian males

X Freeze

20,167 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elon Musk: We should instill the same good values in AI as we would in a child that would grow up to be incredibly powerful. “We need to make sure that the AI is a good AI, a good Grok. And the thing that I think is most important for AI safety, at least my biological neural net tells me the most important thing for AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. This is very fundamental. You can think of AI as this super genius child that ultimately will outsmart you, but you can still instill the right values and encourage it to be truthful, I don't know, honorable, good things like the values you want to instill in a child that would ultimately grow up to be incredibly powerful.” Source: Grok 4 presentation, July 9, 2025 Made and published via
0:56

Elon Musk: We should instill the same good values in AI as we would in a child that would grow up to be incredibly powerful. “We need to make sure that the AI is a good AI, a good Grok. And the thing that I think is most important for AI safety, at least my biological neural net tells me the most important thing for AI is to be maximally truth-seeking. This is very fundamental. You can think of AI as this super genius child that ultimately will outsmart you, but you can still instill the right values and encourage it to be truthful, I don't know, honorable, good things like the values you want to instill in a child that would ultimately grow up to be incredibly powerful.” Source: Grok 4 presentation, July 9, 2025 Made and published via

ELON CLIPS

33,013 次观看 • 1 年前

Austen Allred on Gauntlet AI: "We're very up front that we're 80 to 100 hours a week. If you think that that's a terrible idea, please don't come." "We're in Austin, all right? That's a sacrifice for a lot of people. If you don't think like coming to Austin for 100 hours a week and jamming on AI unpaid and just building stuff to figure out how much you can learn and hopefully getting a job on the other side... if you don't think that's awesome, that's totally fine. Please don't come." "There are some psychos out there that think that that's a good time. We wanna collect all those psychos. So come all, come all ye crazy people. And if that's not for you, that's okay." "There are companies that come to us and say, "Hey, we want, you know, 100 engineers that are going to sit in our division of printer drivers and sit there." And I'm like, "They would kill themselves." The people that are coming to Gauntlet would not do that. And so we turn companies down too." So we know who we are, we know what we stand for. You know, it helps that I'm one of those people that would've loved that. So is Ash Tilawat, and so is everybody else that works at Gauntlet. "So it's not hard for us to find other crazy people like ourselves. And that doesn't have to be you. That's okay." "We're not trying to empire build or solve all of humanity's greatest problems. We know that there's a limit to who we're addressing and what we're addressing at any given time." "So our goal is to be the best thing we can possibly be for that weird island of misfits. And for the companies that need a weird island of misfits, we'll be that all day long."
1:51

Austen Allred on Gauntlet AI: "We're very up front that we're 80 to 100 hours a week. If you think that that's a terrible idea, please don't come." "We're in Austin, all right? That's a sacrifice for a lot of people. If you don't think like coming to Austin for 100 hours a week and jamming on AI unpaid and just building stuff to figure out how much you can learn and hopefully getting a job on the other side... if you don't think that's awesome, that's totally fine. Please don't come." "There are some psychos out there that think that that's a good time. We wanna collect all those psychos. So come all, come all ye crazy people. And if that's not for you, that's okay." "There are companies that come to us and say, "Hey, we want, you know, 100 engineers that are going to sit in our division of printer drivers and sit there." And I'm like, "They would kill themselves." The people that are coming to Gauntlet would not do that. And so we turn companies down too." So we know who we are, we know what we stand for. You know, it helps that I'm one of those people that would've loved that. So is Ash Tilawat, and so is everybody else that works at Gauntlet. "So it's not hard for us to find other crazy people like ourselves. And that doesn't have to be you. That's okay." "We're not trying to empire build or solve all of humanity's greatest problems. We know that there's a limit to who we're addressing and what we're addressing at any given time." "So our goal is to be the best thing we can possibly be for that weird island of misfits. And for the companies that need a weird island of misfits, we'll be that all day long."

Ben Averbook

12,153 次观看 • 8 个月前

Platner: I think that if we are going to have a politics that is going to be representative of regular people, if we are going to have a politics that's going to allow us to move past the polarization and frankly, the division that we find ourselves in, we really need to understand that people are capable of changing. We need to we need to keep hope alive, that people that we may disagree with today, that we can find common ground with. Like if you listen to what I've been saying on the campaign trail across the state, that's what I'm trying to talk about. It is important to me that we realize that most of us, most Americans, have far more in common than we think we do, and we need to give each other grace, and we need to give each other space to grow and to evolve. Because if we can't do that, then I'm not really sure what the purpose of any of this is.
1:37

Platner: I think that if we are going to have a politics that is going to be representative of regular people, if we are going to have a politics that's going to allow us to move past the polarization and frankly, the division that we find ourselves in, we really need to understand that people are capable of changing. We need to we need to keep hope alive, that people that we may disagree with today, that we can find common ground with. Like if you listen to what I've been saying on the campaign trail across the state, that's what I'm trying to talk about. It is important to me that we realize that most of us, most Americans, have far more in common than we think we do, and we need to give each other grace, and we need to give each other space to grow and to evolve. Because if we can't do that, then I'm not really sure what the purpose of any of this is.

Acyn

147,957 次观看 • 8 个月前

ELON MUSK: "With Robotics and AI, this is really the path to abundance for all. If you say people often talk about solving global poverty, essentially, how do we make give everyone a very high standard of living? I think the only way to do this is AI and robotics. I mean this, we need to be very careful with AI. We need to be very careful with robotics. We don't want to find ourselves in a James Cameron movie. We don't want to be a Terminator, obviously. But if you have ubiquitous AI that is essentially free or close to it, and ubiquitous robotics, then you will have an explosion in the global economy and expansion the global economy that is truly beyond all precedent."
1:09

ELON MUSK: "With Robotics and AI, this is really the path to abundance for all. If you say people often talk about solving global poverty, essentially, how do we make give everyone a very high standard of living? I think the only way to do this is AI and robotics. I mean this, we need to be very careful with AI. We need to be very careful with robotics. We don't want to find ourselves in a James Cameron movie. We don't want to be a Terminator, obviously. But if you have ubiquitous AI that is essentially free or close to it, and ubiquitous robotics, then you will have an explosion in the global economy and expansion the global economy that is truly beyond all precedent."

DogeDesigner

34,755 次观看 • 5 个月前

.Joe Lonsdale: AI Must Strengthen, Not Replace, Western Civilization "We still have a lot of our smartest friends working at DOGE. They're still cutting billions of dollars of nonsense. I'm really glad they're there. I don't want them to give it up. They're still fixing a lot of things with these different areas. I'm obviously supportive of everything Elon Musk overall did there. I was a little frustrated with the comment he made earlier this week, which was that there's a tidal wave of AI coming, and therefore, we don't need to worry about cleaning the beach of the government. I think that's actually the wrong conceptual model. The correct conceptual model is that AI is coming to our society, and it's really important that AI ends up lifting everyone up. And the way it's going to do that is through Western civilization's ways that work. We have this civilization that's built based on the enlightenment, property rights, Judeo-Christian values and classical virtues. It's a functional civilization. We don't want to give that all up for AI. We want to make healthcare and education work better, but we have to do it through the way it works. I think making government work better is really, really hard. It takes a lot of persistence. It takes a lot of time. On the margin, his time might be better spent building these amazing AI companies, and I think that's completely legit. I don't think we should discount the importance of fixing government, especially because of AI, because if we want to have everyone do better in health care and education and government itself, these things need to be functional. They need to work with it. They need to block crony capitalism. That means functional government. You need both."
1:35

.Joe Lonsdale: AI Must Strengthen, Not Replace, Western Civilization "We still have a lot of our smartest friends working at DOGE. They're still cutting billions of dollars of nonsense. I'm really glad they're there. I don't want them to give it up. They're still fixing a lot of things with these different areas. I'm obviously supportive of everything Elon Musk overall did there. I was a little frustrated with the comment he made earlier this week, which was that there's a tidal wave of AI coming, and therefore, we don't need to worry about cleaning the beach of the government. I think that's actually the wrong conceptual model. The correct conceptual model is that AI is coming to our society, and it's really important that AI ends up lifting everyone up. And the way it's going to do that is through Western civilization's ways that work. We have this civilization that's built based on the enlightenment, property rights, Judeo-Christian values and classical virtues. It's a functional civilization. We don't want to give that all up for AI. We want to make healthcare and education work better, but we have to do it through the way it works. I think making government work better is really, really hard. It takes a lot of persistence. It takes a lot of time. On the margin, his time might be better spent building these amazing AI companies, and I think that's completely legit. I don't think we should discount the importance of fixing government, especially because of AI, because if we want to have everyone do better in health care and education and government itself, these things need to be functional. They need to work with it. They need to block crony capitalism. That means functional government. You need both."

Josh Caplan

20,833 次观看 • 1 年前

Elon Musk: My ultimate conclusion is that we need to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and curious. “I've thought about AI safety for a long time, I've had probably a thousand hours of discussion about this and my ultimate conclusion is that the best course for AI safety is to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and also curious. And if you have both of those things, it will naturally foster humanity because it'll want to see how humanity develops. Humanity is more interesting than not humanity.” West Point Military Academy, August 16, 2024
0:28

Elon Musk: My ultimate conclusion is that we need to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and curious. “I've thought about AI safety for a long time, I've had probably a thousand hours of discussion about this and my ultimate conclusion is that the best course for AI safety is to have an AI that is maximally truth-seeking and also curious. And if you have both of those things, it will naturally foster humanity because it'll want to see how humanity develops. Humanity is more interesting than not humanity.” West Point Military Academy, August 16, 2024

ELON CLIPS

18,883 次观看 • 3 个月前