Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

ELON: SPACEX WON A GOVERNMENT INTERNET ACCESS CONTRACT, BUT THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION REVOKED IT - WHY!? “They had this $42 billion [program for Internet access], and [SpaceX] competed, and we won, and we would have actually been able to supply a lot of Starlink terminals to the states that... were affected by the hurricanes. And they revoked the award. It's messed up. Why!? To date, for that 42 billion program, the total number of citizens that have received broadband from that $42 billion allocation is zero. Forty-two billion dollars for zero. I would call that waste. That is not a good use of money. There was also a big government initiative, I think $7 billion, or something like that, for a nationwide network of electric superchargers. I think they made like 10. This is the most egregious waste of money. There are so many situations like that. It just goes to bureaucrats and consultants, and nothing gets done. And it's wasting your money, which is crazy. The opportunity to reduce government waste is actually, I think, easy, because there's so much of it. They just don't care about your money, which is messed up. So, I think the Department of Government Efficiency is going to face a target-rich environment for reducing cost.” Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, October 19, 2024show more

Mario Nawfal

3,558,617 subscribers

209,285 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

e/acc1 year ago

Elon should take a look at $PRISM Launching soon 🚀

UserInterface5 years ago

Will Elon Musk and SpaceX Ever Reach Mars? #mars #elonmusk #science

Maria 𝑀𝒶𝓇𝒾𝒶 🌊🌊1 year ago

Seriously, I can’t wait to the 20th January ✊🏻🇺🇸

BEBE Artist1 year ago

The fundamental reason is that they cannot receive bonuses at SpaceX.😄

Tena’s Take1 year ago

We jumped on starlink asap because we knew we would never get fiber

mscode1 year ago

DOGE

Stock Mom™1 year ago

Pure partisan agendas! Elon's alignment with Trump made Biden and all the DemoRats so triggered that they couldn't look beyond how much good Starlink would do for their own American citizens. Pathetic!

Ch-are-Lee1 year ago

So many cases like this throughout the gov, it is time for @DOGE to get to work.

𝙅𝙚𝙖𝙣𝙞𝙪𝙨Ⓧ𝙊𝙣𝙡𝙞𝙣𝙚1 year ago

They got too much of our money, and use it like it's monopoly game money that they won!😠 It's outrageous! Yes, please monitor these callous creatures that bathe in our money, and downsize them out of a job! They've been careless, greedy and doing a nasty job for the American people's tax money. Out they GO!!😒👉The door is that way👉

GABRIEL 🪽1 year ago

Trump would have ensured SpaceX's $42 billion internet access contract wasn't revoked, prioritizing efficiency and results over bureaucracy, getting broadband to those in need much faster.

Dreamaster1 year ago

One of the biggest mistake they did is pissed Elon off. They still don't realize what they lost.

Related Videos

Elon Musk: SpaceX could have supplied Starlink to the states affected by the hurricanes, but the Biden admin revoked the award. “I'm actually generally against subsidies and incentives. We should let taxpayers keep their money is my opinion. But they had this $42 billion thing and we competed and we won and we would have actually been able to supply a lot of Starlink terminals to the states that were affected by the hurricanes and they revoked the award. It's messed up. Like why? To date, that $42-billion program, the total number of citizens that have received broadband from that $42-billion allocation is zero. $42 billion for zero? I would call that waste. Yeah, that's waste.” Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024

Elon Musk: SpaceX could have supplied Starlink to the states affected by the hurricanes, but the Biden admin revoked the award. “I'm actually generally against subsidies and incentives. We should let taxpayers keep their money is my opinion. But they had this $42 billion thing and we competed and we won and we would have actually been able to supply a lot of Starlink terminals to the states that were affected by the hurricanes and they revoked the award. It's messed up. Like why? To date, that $42-billion program, the total number of citizens that have received broadband from that $42-billion allocation is zero. $42 billion for zero? I would call that waste. Yeah, that's waste.” Town Hall in Harrisburg, October 19, 2024

ELON CLIPS

25,596 views • 1 year ago

🚨ELON MUSK: "SpaceX competed and won for a $42B award to deliver rural broadband. They revoked the award. We would have been able to provide Starlink terminals and rural broadband and they revoked the award. To date out of that $42 billion allocation the amount of people who have received internet has been has been zero. There was also a nationwide initiative for superchargers -- they made like 10. There are so many examples of wastes of money. The money goes to bureaucrats and consultants and nothing gets done. The opportunity to reduce government waste is easy, because there's so much of it."

🚨ELON MUSK: "SpaceX competed and won for a $42B award to deliver rural broadband. They revoked the award. We would have been able to provide Starlink terminals and rural broadband and they revoked the award. To date out of that $42 billion allocation the amount of people who have received internet has been has been zero. There was also a nationwide initiative for superchargers -- they made like 10. There are so many examples of wastes of money. The money goes to bureaucrats and consultants and nothing gets done. The opportunity to reduce government waste is easy, because there's so much of it."

Autism Capital 🧩

15,656,149 views • 1 year ago

ELON MUSK: "Step number one is for the government to spend a lot less money. I know there are a lot of super wasteful things. Look at the $42 billion that was allocated for rural broadband. SpaceX won a quarter of it, but they rescinded it for political reasons. A bunch of those terminals would have been in the affected hurricane areas in North Carolina. So that could have cost lives. That kind of political lawfare is unconscionable. Do you know how many people have been connected by that $42 billion? Literally, ZERO. So, I would say that program should be zero because the value for money is zero." 🇺🇸🇺🇸 P.S. Kamala Harris led the $42 billion program as the designated "broadband czar."

ELON MUSK: "Step number one is for the government to spend a lot less money. I know there are a lot of super wasteful things. Look at the $42 billion that was allocated for rural broadband. SpaceX won a quarter of it, but they rescinded it for political reasons. A bunch of those terminals would have been in the affected hurricane areas in North Carolina. So that could have cost lives. That kind of political lawfare is unconscionable. Do you know how many people have been connected by that $42 billion? Literally, ZERO. So, I would say that program should be zero because the value for money is zero." 🇺🇸🇺🇸 P.S. Kamala Harris led the $42 billion program as the designated "broadband czar."

KanekoaTheGreat

7,729,104 views • 1 year ago

“Where the hell did the money go?” "Where'd the $14 billion go that went into high speed rail project? It's a 'high speed rail,' but there's no rail. There's nothing. $14B. Whose pocket is that money in?" David david friedberg on California'a Fraud: This isn’t partisan, it’s accountability: follow the money, audit the system, & expose where 'government spending' is actually going. "Anyone who fights back against it is simply un-American." . . . "Nick shirley, I think does a great job exposing how so much of that money's wasted. I asked this question of Mayor Matt Mahan, who's running for governor. I was like, dude, where'd the $14 billion go? Yeah, that went into that high speed rail project. There was like, no, it's a high speed rail, but there's no rail. There's nothing $14 billion. I'm like, whose pocket is that money in? Everyone should ask that question of your government, of your elected officials, of your politicians, of your leaders. Where the hell did the money go? And in many cases you'll find that it just went to create wealth for a few people that are cronies or thieves or that stole it, or it was used to create fake jobs that aren't productive. Meaning no one's making anything, they're just taking money and living off of that money from the government. And both of those are not what was promised when people pay taxes and the government says it's gonna do a service. We need to hold the government accountable to do the service, and that just doesn't happen. So I think Nick Shirley holds the government accountable. I think there are dozens of copycats, which I frigging love. And show the crazy sh*t that's going on and ask the tough questions. Run the audits. Treasury in the federal government should be running the audits and figuring out where all the money go."

“Where the hell did the money go?” "Where'd the $14 billion go that went into high speed rail project? It's a 'high speed rail,' but there's no rail. There's nothing. $14B. Whose pocket is that money in?" David david friedberg on California'a Fraud: This isn’t partisan, it’s accountability: follow the money, audit the system, & expose where 'government spending' is actually going. "Anyone who fights back against it is simply un-American." . . . "Nick shirley, I think does a great job exposing how so much of that money's wasted. I asked this question of Mayor Matt Mahan, who's running for governor. I was like, dude, where'd the $14 billion go? Yeah, that went into that high speed rail project. There was like, no, it's a high speed rail, but there's no rail. There's nothing $14 billion. I'm like, whose pocket is that money in? Everyone should ask that question of your government, of your elected officials, of your politicians, of your leaders. Where the hell did the money go? And in many cases you'll find that it just went to create wealth for a few people that are cronies or thieves or that stole it, or it was used to create fake jobs that aren't productive. Meaning no one's making anything, they're just taking money and living off of that money from the government. And both of those are not what was promised when people pay taxes and the government says it's gonna do a service. We need to hold the government accountable to do the service, and that just doesn't happen. So I think Nick Shirley holds the government accountable. I think there are dozens of copycats, which I frigging love. And show the crazy sh*t that's going on and ask the tough questions. Run the audits. Treasury in the federal government should be running the audits and figuring out where all the money go."

Molly O’Shea

237,313 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk: There's a total misunderstanding that my companies are being subsidized and supported by the government. “We've got to be one of the biggest government contractors. We do essential work for the government. We do useful essential work that we compete for and win contracts on because our product is much better and costs less. If you take, for example, the NASA contract to transport astronauts to and from the space station, NASA awarded two contracts at the start, one to Boeing and one to SpaceX. Boeing was awarded twice as much as SpaceX. SpaceX has done all the astronaut transport from the space station and Boeing has only done one transport of two astronauts to the space station. And we have to bring them back. Boeing got twice as much as SpaceX. There's this total misunderstanding that my companies have been subsidized and supported by the government. Do you really think that a Biden administration is going to subsidize me? Probably not. Are you kidding? No. In fact, they take away every contract they possibly can. So, for example, there was the FCC $42 billion contract for providing rural broadband. We actually first said, look, we think there shouldn't be any subsidies, so we recommend that this program just not exist. But since you're insisting that it exist, we will compete and we have better products. So we won, I don't know about a quarter of it, which would have included the devastated areas like North Carolina and stuff. And the FCC took it away illegally. They just voted three out of five commissioners voted away and said, even though you won it, we're rescinding it. On what grounds? And do you know how many people they've connected? Zero. So you think that was political? Well, the three Democrats voted against it. And the two Republicans voted for it.” Source: Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 7, 2024

Elon Musk: There's a total misunderstanding that my companies are being subsidized and supported by the government. “We've got to be one of the biggest government contractors. We do essential work for the government. We do useful essential work that we compete for and win contracts on because our product is much better and costs less. If you take, for example, the NASA contract to transport astronauts to and from the space station, NASA awarded two contracts at the start, one to Boeing and one to SpaceX. Boeing was awarded twice as much as SpaceX. SpaceX has done all the astronaut transport from the space station and Boeing has only done one transport of two astronauts to the space station. And we have to bring them back. Boeing got twice as much as SpaceX. There's this total misunderstanding that my companies have been subsidized and supported by the government. Do you really think that a Biden administration is going to subsidize me? Probably not. Are you kidding? No. In fact, they take away every contract they possibly can. So, for example, there was the FCC $42 billion contract for providing rural broadband. We actually first said, look, we think there shouldn't be any subsidies, so we recommend that this program just not exist. But since you're insisting that it exist, we will compete and we have better products. So we won, I don't know about a quarter of it, which would have included the devastated areas like North Carolina and stuff. And the FCC took it away illegally. They just voted three out of five commissioners voted away and said, even though you won it, we're rescinding it. On what grounds? And do you know how many people they've connected? Zero. So you think that was political? Well, the three Democrats voted against it. And the two Republicans voted for it.” Source: Interview with Tucker Carlson, October 7, 2024

ELON CLIPS

17,280 views • 3 months ago

NEW: Elon Musk just revealed that the government handed the Navy $12 billion to build new submarines—and not a single submarine was built. When investigators asked where the money went, Navy officials shrugged and said they had no idea. “There’s a case where I think Senator Collins was telling me about how she gave the Navy $12 billion for more submarines, got no extra submarines, and then held a hearing to say where the $12 billion go. “And they were like, we don’t know. That was it. I mean, basically, stuff is so crazy. Only the federal government could get away with this level of waste,” Musk said.

NEW: Elon Musk just revealed that the government handed the Navy $12 billion to build new submarines—and not a single submarine was built. When investigators asked where the money went, Navy officials shrugged and said they had no idea. “There’s a case where I think Senator Collins was telling me about how she gave the Navy $12 billion for more submarines, got no extra submarines, and then held a hearing to say where the $12 billion go. “And they were like, we don’t know. That was it. I mean, basically, stuff is so crazy. Only the federal government could get away with this level of waste,” Musk said.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

3,782,764 views • 1 year ago

Kimbal Musk explains United States Government wants to pay $1 billion dollars per rocket launch SpaceX came along and said no, the price is way lower at only $50 million US Government pushed back and wanted the cost $1 billion dollars per launch “Government would say, "But we'll pay you $1 billion. We just want you to do it our way." No, but that's the wrong way. You have to do it this way. It's $50 million. We were very happy with that price. The government was like, "No, we don't want that." And we actually couldn't believe it. We're like, "But you must want it for a lower price." Actually, they didn't care that much about price.” Basically it works like this Old defense contractors can spend as much as they want and the government will pay that amount plus 10%. That means they have an incentive to make the launches as expensive as possible SpaceX said here’s a fixed price of $50 million and if we can do it cheaper then we can keep the extra money This is a much better incentive system because it saves taxpayers a huge amount of money and SpaceX gets rewarded for making launches cheaper

Kimbal Musk explains United States Government wants to pay $1 billion dollars per rocket launch SpaceX came along and said no, the price is way lower at only $50 million US Government pushed back and wanted the cost $1 billion dollars per launch “Government would say, "But we'll pay you $1 billion. We just want you to do it our way." No, but that's the wrong way. You have to do it this way. It's $50 million. We were very happy with that price. The government was like, "No, we don't want that." And we actually couldn't believe it. We're like, "But you must want it for a lower price." Actually, they didn't care that much about price.” Basically it works like this Old defense contractors can spend as much as they want and the government will pay that amount plus 10%. That means they have an incentive to make the launches as expensive as possible SpaceX said here’s a fixed price of $50 million and if we can do it cheaper then we can keep the extra money This is a much better incentive system because it saves taxpayers a huge amount of money and SpaceX gets rewarded for making launches cheaper

Wall Street Apes

1,229,204 views • 1 month ago

DOOCY TIME: “So, since Liberation Day, there’s about $175 billion in tariff revenue that is now in limbo. Do you have to refund $175 billion of it?” President Trump: “Well, think of, it — think of it, Peter. Very fair question. They take months and months to write an opinion and they don’t even discuss that point. We’ve taken in hundreds of billions of dollars, not millions, hundreds of billions of dollars. And so, I said, well, what happens to all the money that we took in? It wasn’t discussed. Wouldn’t you think they would have put one sentence in there saying that, keep the money or don’t keep the money, right? I guess it has to get litigated for the next two years. So, they write this terrible, defective decision, totally defective. It’s almost like not written by smart people. And what they do, they don’t even talk about it. Your question is very basic. That was the first question I asked also to make you feel good. I said, what about all the money that we’ve taken in? Sir, they don’t discuss that. How crazy is that?”

DOOCY TIME: “So, since Liberation Day, there’s about $175 billion in tariff revenue that is now in limbo. Do you have to refund $175 billion of it?” President Trump: “Well, think of, it — think of it, Peter. Very fair question. They take months and months to write an opinion and they don’t even discuss that point. We’ve taken in hundreds of billions of dollars, not millions, hundreds of billions of dollars. And so, I said, well, what happens to all the money that we took in? It wasn’t discussed. Wouldn’t you think they would have put one sentence in there saying that, keep the money or don’t keep the money, right? I guess it has to get litigated for the next two years. So, they write this terrible, defective decision, totally defective. It’s almost like not written by smart people. And what they do, they don’t even talk about it. Your question is very basic. That was the first question I asked also to make you feel good. I said, what about all the money that we’ve taken in? Sir, they don’t discuss that. How crazy is that?”

Curtis Houck

518,601 views • 5 months ago

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsh*t “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the f**k 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely f**king closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sh*t up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

David Friedberg on the Nonprofit Scam: 90% Are Bullsht “ The definition of exempt activities is charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literacy, public safety, or fostering amateur sports competition, or preventing cruelty to children or animals. You tell me how the fk 90% of what we call nonprofits today fall under that definition. We have completely fking closed our eyes to the fact that organizations, regardless of political affiliation or social interest, have fundamental commercial and probably not aligned interests with the definition of a 501(c)(3), and we've allowed them all to get away with it for far too long. I don't think that this is a blue or red thing. I think that this is a thing where we let these organizations make it easy to get money, to hide the money, and to do whatever the hell they want with the money, and we need to stop it. And I think that it's an amazing opportunity right now for everyone to kind of reset the decks by cleaning all the sht up, and getting all of these organizations flushed, and make sure that any organization that wants to do whatever bullsh*t, nefarious things they want to do, by all means do it. But it's not a nonprofit and you shouldn't get a charitable donation deduction, and the government should not be putting money into these sorts of things. This is an entirely different sort of activity in the social order. And as a libertarian, I'm all for it, but I don't think that they should be tax exempt, and I don't think they should be getting government money, and I don't think that individuals should be benefiting from giving them money. And if we could fix all that shit up, I think a lot of these problems are going to go away.”

The All-In Podcast

575,013 views • 3 months ago

Gavin Baker says the SpaceX bull case is $400B a year if they build out 8 gigawatts of compute "FundaAI thinks that SpaceX is going to try and bring on eight gigawatts of compute. I will never bet against Elon, but I mean, that would be a truly incredible feat." "And rates have gone up since they signed those last contracts, not down. And they're monetizing at something like $50 billion a gig." "Consensus estimates for next year are $73 billion. So forget Starlink V3, forget Starlink Direct to Cell, Grok 4.5 and Cursor... the sum of that probably hits a 10 billion dollar mark." "There's a big New York hedge fund short case on [SPCX]. They think, 'oh, the spot price for compute's going to go down 90%, and you're going to bring on all this compute, it's not going to generate nearly as much revenue as you think.'" "I think one of Elon's phrases is, 'we specialize in making the impossible late.' I just think very little is built into that stock, for the amount of compute that they might be able to bring on."

Gavin Baker says the SpaceX bull case is $400B a year if they build out 8 gigawatts of compute "FundaAI thinks that SpaceX is going to try and bring on eight gigawatts of compute. I will never bet against Elon, but I mean, that would be a truly incredible feat." "And rates have gone up since they signed those last contracts, not down. And they're monetizing at something like $50 billion a gig." "Consensus estimates for next year are $73 billion. So forget Starlink V3, forget Starlink Direct to Cell, Grok 4.5 and Cursor... the sum of that probably hits a 10 billion dollar mark." "There's a big New York hedge fund short case on [SPCX]. They think, 'oh, the spot price for compute's going to go down 90%, and you're going to bring on all this compute, it's not going to generate nearly as much revenue as you think.'" "I think one of Elon's phrases is, 'we specialize in making the impossible late.' I just think very little is built into that stock, for the amount of compute that they might be able to bring on."

dnap

43,531 views • 6 days ago

Elon Musk: Entrenched interests will be grumpy about DOGE, but the American people will be very happy. “The Department of Government Efficiency is really going to take a look at all the federal expenditures and say, if you're not getting great value for money for your hard-earned tax dollars, cancel it. I would like to say it's a hard job, but actually it's not, because there's so much waste. I actually think this is a fairly easy job. Although it will get a lot of opposition, naturally, from the entrenched interests that get the money and do nothing good with it. They'll be grumpy about it. But the American people will be very happy that their tax dollars are being spent in a much more sensible way.” Pittsburgh, October 20, 2024

Elon Musk: Entrenched interests will be grumpy about DOGE, but the American people will be very happy. “The Department of Government Efficiency is really going to take a look at all the federal expenditures and say, if you're not getting great value for money for your hard-earned tax dollars, cancel it. I would like to say it's a hard job, but actually it's not, because there's so much waste. I actually think this is a fairly easy job. Although it will get a lot of opposition, naturally, from the entrenched interests that get the money and do nothing good with it. They'll be grumpy about it. But the American people will be very happy that their tax dollars are being spent in a much more sensible way.” Pittsburgh, October 20, 2024

ELON CLIPS

7,971,882 views • 1 year ago

WATCH: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Sets the Record Straight on Department of Government Efficiency "Elon and I are completely aligned in terms of cutting waste and increasing accountability and transparency for the American people. I believe that this DOGE program ... is one of the most important audits of government we have seen." "There's a big agenda and I think that there are gigantic cost savings for the American people here. I think it's unfortunate the way the media wants to lampoon what is going on. These are highly trained professionals. This is not some roving band going around doing things. This is methodical and it is going to yield big savings." CC: Elon Musk

WATCH: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Sets the Record Straight on Department of Government Efficiency "Elon and I are completely aligned in terms of cutting waste and increasing accountability and transparency for the American people. I believe that this DOGE program ... is one of the most important audits of government we have seen." "There's a big agenda and I think that there are gigantic cost savings for the American people here. I think it's unfortunate the way the media wants to lampoon what is going on. These are highly trained professionals. This is not some roving band going around doing things. This is methodical and it is going to yield big savings." CC: Elon Musk

Chief Nerd

2,358,357 views • 1 year ago

Elon Musk believes that YES, prominent Democrats like Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff and Chuck Schumer have received USAID money funneled through NGOs “There is a massive amount of corruption — So they'll send the money overseas to one NGO, then it'll go through a bunch of them, and then I'm highly confident that a bunch of that money then comes back to the United States and lands in the pockets of the people you just mentioned.” “So what happens is there's money that, obviously it's your taxpayer money, that is then sent to various government organizations who then send it to, to NGOs, which, which an NGO is a non-governmental organization. But obviously if it's a government-funded non-governmental organization, it's just an organization, it's just a government. And effectively there's a giant fraud loophole, which is that the government can send money to an NGO that is then no longer governed by the law laws of the United States. So they'll, they'll send the money overseas to one NGO, then it'll go through a bunch of a bunch of them. And then I'm highly confident that a bunch of that money then comes back to the United States and lands in the pockets of the people you just mentioned. But it is a circuitous route. It's not like it doesn't go directly, but let's just say that there's a lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress where I'm trying to connect the dots of how did they become rich? Well earning, how'd they get $20 million if they're earning $200,000 a year? It sounds that's how, how do I just, nobody can explain that. So it’s something we're gonna try to figure it out and certainly stop it from happening. The whole NGO scam is just crazy — It’s blown my mind really”

Elon Musk believes that YES, prominent Democrats like Maxine Waters, Adam Schiff and Chuck Schumer have received USAID money funneled through NGOs “There is a massive amount of corruption — So they'll send the money overseas to one NGO, then it'll go through a bunch of them, and then I'm highly confident that a bunch of that money then comes back to the United States and lands in the pockets of the people you just mentioned.” “So what happens is there's money that, obviously it's your taxpayer money, that is then sent to various government organizations who then send it to, to NGOs, which, which an NGO is a non-governmental organization. But obviously if it's a government-funded non-governmental organization, it's just an organization, it's just a government. And effectively there's a giant fraud loophole, which is that the government can send money to an NGO that is then no longer governed by the law laws of the United States. So they'll, they'll send the money overseas to one NGO, then it'll go through a bunch of a bunch of them. And then I'm highly confident that a bunch of that money then comes back to the United States and lands in the pockets of the people you just mentioned. But it is a circuitous route. It's not like it doesn't go directly, but let's just say that there's a lot of strangely wealthy members of Congress where I'm trying to connect the dots of how did they become rich? Well earning, how'd they get $20 million if they're earning $200,000 a year? It sounds that's how, how do I just, nobody can explain that. So it’s something we're gonna try to figure it out and certainly stop it from happening. The whole NGO scam is just crazy — It’s blown my mind really”

Wall Street Apes

341,422 views • 1 year ago

Palmer Luckey explains the curse of being a billionaire "People also misunderstand. They think that billionaires work to make more money.....for most billionaires, the sickness is not gathering dollars..." Interviewer: "21 and you're a billionaire." Palmer Luckey: "That's right." Interviewer: "Why didn't you just go, 'Okay, that's me done. I've done all the hard work. I'm just going to enjoy my life now.'" Palmer Luckey: "It is a common question, and what I've observed with myself and everyone else I know who's made a billion dollars is that the type of person who makes a billion dollars is not the kind of guy who can imagine doing that. It's just people say, 'Oh, you know, if I had a billion, I'd go and I'd drink mai tais on the beach.' My point is, that's the attitude that won't get you to a billion dollars. It's very rare that the two things come together. And so, in a way, it's a little bit of a curse. And I'm not trying to make it sound like I have a terrible life. I love my life. But the curse of it is that anyone who can get to a billion probably has something wrong with their brain where no matter how much they get, they'll never stop working." "People also misunderstand. They think that billionaires work to make more money. Like, 'Oh, they're just trying to make more and more. They just want money.' I can tell you, for most billionaires, the sickness is not gathering dollars. It's working and doing things. If they didn't have any money, they would probably still be doing the same thing. You know, but money is a good scoreboard to keep track of who's doing more. But I couldn't imagine not working. My wife would be the first to tell you I'm a bit of a workaholic, and it's because I love what I'm doing. Why would I go sit on a beach when I could be working at Anduril? Why would I go get a massage when I can do a 12-hour shift?"

Palmer Luckey explains the curse of being a billionaire "People also misunderstand. They think that billionaires work to make more money.....for most billionaires, the sickness is not gathering dollars..." Interviewer: "21 and you're a billionaire." Palmer Luckey: "That's right." Interviewer: "Why didn't you just go, 'Okay, that's me done. I've done all the hard work. I'm just going to enjoy my life now.'" Palmer Luckey: "It is a common question, and what I've observed with myself and everyone else I know who's made a billion dollars is that the type of person who makes a billion dollars is not the kind of guy who can imagine doing that. It's just people say, 'Oh, you know, if I had a billion, I'd go and I'd drink mai tais on the beach.' My point is, that's the attitude that won't get you to a billion dollars. It's very rare that the two things come together. And so, in a way, it's a little bit of a curse. And I'm not trying to make it sound like I have a terrible life. I love my life. But the curse of it is that anyone who can get to a billion probably has something wrong with their brain where no matter how much they get, they'll never stop working." "People also misunderstand. They think that billionaires work to make more money. Like, 'Oh, they're just trying to make more and more. They just want money.' I can tell you, for most billionaires, the sickness is not gathering dollars. It's working and doing things. If they didn't have any money, they would probably still be doing the same thing. You know, but money is a good scoreboard to keep track of who's doing more. But I couldn't imagine not working. My wife would be the first to tell you I'm a bit of a workaholic, and it's because I love what I'm doing. Why would I go sit on a beach when I could be working at Anduril? Why would I go get a massage when I can do a 12-hour shift?"

Tony Jacob | FindaClip.com

814,057 views • 1 day ago

INSANE 🚨 Elon Musk reveals that the Pentagon “loses” between $20-$30 billion dollars EVERY YEAR “The Pentagon, their accounting error, like the stuff that they lose in the couch cushions, is like $20-$30 billion a year. They just dunno where it went. It's gone.” “Where'd it go? And it's gone — It's just, it's so insane. It's insane.” “I just wanna like emphasize the sheer madness of the government. It's just because they have like magic money computers that the checks never bounce through the federal government. So you don't have the normal corrective mechanism that you'd have for a company or for an individual. The checks just always, always clear. The net result is inflation, which is effectively attacks on everyone.”

INSANE 🚨 Elon Musk reveals that the Pentagon “loses” between $20-$30 billion dollars EVERY YEAR “The Pentagon, their accounting error, like the stuff that they lose in the couch cushions, is like $20-$30 billion a year. They just dunno where it went. It's gone.” “Where'd it go? And it's gone — It's just, it's so insane. It's insane.” “I just wanna like emphasize the sheer madness of the government. It's just because they have like magic money computers that the checks never bounce through the federal government. So you don't have the normal corrective mechanism that you'd have for a company or for an individual. The checks just always, always clear. The net result is inflation, which is effectively attacks on everyone.”

Wall Street Apes

761,789 views • 1 year ago

One of the most astonishing attempts at projecting grandiose delusions I’ve ever seen—“so [Obama] tried to bribe them to make a deal… 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing…” Trump bribed Iran with $324 billion. And got nothing for it. “And the main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. They fully agreed to that with strong policing powers, and they won't have nuclear weapons, which is what I was all about, because they probably would have used it if they had it. So we had two big moments when they terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barrack Hussein Obama deal, and when I terminated that, it was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran. It was a deal where 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing 7, well, not a 7, 7, 57, I guess, right? But it was put on a big, beautiful Boeing 757. They needed a Boeing 747 to be honest with you, because it was a lot of cash. 1.7 billion was taken out of the banks and given to Iran, and on top of that, tens of billions of dollars was made. So they tried to bribe them to make a deal that didn't work. It never works. And that we lived on a great job, and hopefully it's going to be a good relationship, and we're going to get along. And if we don't, we go back to where we started, but I don't know if it's going to be necessary. The Iran deal that we made is going to bring a lot of success to the world, because the oil was really plugged up there for a while. They would call me on occasion, "See, come on, please. Let's go." The oil prices. But the oil is coming way down.”

One of the most astonishing attempts at projecting grandiose delusions I’ve ever seen—“so [Obama] tried to bribe them to make a deal… 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing…” Trump bribed Iran with $324 billion. And got nothing for it. “And the main thing is that Iran will not have a nuclear weapon. They fully agreed to that with strong policing powers, and they won't have nuclear weapons, which is what I was all about, because they probably would have used it if they had it. So we had two big moments when they terminated the JCPOA, that was the Obama deal, the Barrack Hussein Obama deal, and when I terminated that, it was very important because it was a road to a nuclear weapon. It was a horrible deal for the United States. It was a deal where billions of dollars was given to Iran. It was a deal where 1.7 billion in cash was put on a Boeing 7, well, not a 7, 7, 57, I guess, right? But it was put on a big, beautiful Boeing 757. They needed a Boeing 747 to be honest with you, because it was a lot of cash. 1.7 billion was taken out of the banks and given to Iran, and on top of that, tens of billions of dollars was made. So they tried to bribe them to make a deal that didn't work. It never works. And that we lived on a great job, and hopefully it's going to be a good relationship, and we're going to get along. And if we don't, we go back to where we started, but I don't know if it's going to be necessary. The Iran deal that we made is going to bring a lot of success to the world, because the oil was really plugged up there for a while. They would call me on occasion, "See, come on, please. Let's go." The oil prices. But the oil is coming way down.”

Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸

31,475 views • 1 month ago

So Mind Blowing Elon Musk “Senator Susan Collins was telling me about how she gave the Navy $12 billion for more submarines, got no extra submarines and then held a hearing to say, where'd the $12 billion go? And they were like, we don't know. That was it” “I mean, the stuff is so crazy. It's like only the federal government could get away with this level of waste”

So Mind Blowing Elon Musk “Senator Susan Collins was telling me about how she gave the Navy $12 billion for more submarines, got no extra submarines and then held a hearing to say, where'd the $12 billion go? And they were like, we don't know. That was it” “I mean, the stuff is so crazy. It's like only the federal government could get away with this level of waste”

Wall Street Apes

1,682,755 views • 1 year ago