Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

EMERGENCY: Journalism For Dummies Question 1/ Mr Burnham: when you became Mayor what was your Total Family Wealth? Shares, Savings, Property, Pensions etc Question 2/ Mr Burnham: when you became Labour MP recently what was your Total Family Wealth? Shares, Savings, Property, Pensions etc 3/ What was your Mayoral... show more

Pete Sanford

26,686 subscribers

15,628 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

When Magic's owner died, there was no plan for her... she was kept on the property for 11 months as a "guard dog" with no human contact. We only got a call once the property was up for sale and they needed to "get rid of the dog". Please don't think your family would do the right thing for your pets. This is a serious issue that has to be handled with properly, and if your family won't help, we will. Please respond the word PLAN and I'll personally call you. Eldad

When Magic's owner died, there was no plan for her... she was kept on the property for 11 months as a "guard dog" with no human contact. We only got a call once the property was up for sale and they needed to "get rid of the dog". Please don't think your family would do the right thing for your pets. This is a serious issue that has to be handled with properly, and if your family won't help, we will. Please respond the word PLAN and I'll personally call you. Eldad

Hope For Paws

18,861 views • 3 months ago

When do the Clintons get arrested “USAID gave Chelsea Clinton $82 million through the Clinton Global Initiative. $82 million dollars — It's documented. We have receipts” - $11 million went to pay for a mansion - $3 million went to her wedding - $83 million was given total - Not a dime of income tax was paid on any of it “All of it is theft. So let me ask you something. If you or I skipped out on paying taxes, what would happen? The IRS would be at our door tomorrow. They'd freeze your account, they'd garnish your paycheck, they'd throw your ass in jail. But if your last name is Clinton, well, you get a pass, right? And you get a check from the government, a fat one. You get a wedding on the house. You get a mansion all paid in full and you walk away smiling. That's the system. It's not broken, it's rigged.”

When do the Clintons get arrested “USAID gave Chelsea Clinton $82 million through the Clinton Global Initiative. $82 million dollars — It's documented. We have receipts” - $11 million went to pay for a mansion - $3 million went to her wedding - $83 million was given total - Not a dime of income tax was paid on any of it “All of it is theft. So let me ask you something. If you or I skipped out on paying taxes, what would happen? The IRS would be at our door tomorrow. They'd freeze your account, they'd garnish your paycheck, they'd throw your ass in jail. But if your last name is Clinton, well, you get a pass, right? And you get a check from the government, a fat one. You get a wedding on the house. You get a mansion all paid in full and you walk away smiling. That's the system. It's not broken, it's rigged.”

Wall Street Apes

804,527 views • 10 months ago

A visibly frustrated Tom Brady shares how much he “hates” the NFL’s fine system. He asks what kind of job says: “Hey, we’re going to take your salary away” when you make a mistake. He also can’t stand that some fans cheer when players get slapped with $100,000 fines. “I hate the fact that you sign a contract for $2 million a year, $5 million a year, and it’s so easy for someone to say, ‘Give me $75,000,’ ‘Give me $50,000.’” “‘Oh, it’s your second offense? That’s $100,000.’ ‘That’s your third offense? $200,000.’” “What job is like that in the world? Where you make a mistake at your job, and they come, and they go, ‘Hey, we’re going to take your salary away.’” “And then people are like, ‘Yeah, you should take his salary away.’ And I’m like [throws his hands up in the air].” A visibly frustrated Tom Brady shares how much he “hates” the NFL’s fine system. He asks what kind of job says: “Hey, we’re going to take your salary away” when you make a mistake. He also can’t stand that some fans cheer when players get slapped with $100,000 fines. “I hate the fact that you sign a contract for $2 million a year, $5 million a year, and it’s so easy for someone to say, ‘Give me $75,000,’ ‘Give me $50,000.’” “‘Oh, it’s your second offense? That’s $100,000.’ ‘That’s your third offense? $200,000.’” “What job is like that in the world? Where you make a mistake at your job, and they come, and they go, ‘Hey, we’re going to take your salary away.’” “And then people are like, ‘Yeah, you should take his salary away.’ And I’m like [throws his hands up in the air].”

A visibly frustrated Tom Brady shares how much he “hates” the NFL’s fine system. He asks what kind of job says: “Hey, we’re going to take your salary away” when you make a mistake. He also can’t stand that some fans cheer when players get slapped with $100,000 fines. “I hate the fact that you sign a contract for $2 million a year, $5 million a year, and it’s so easy for someone to say, ‘Give me $75,000,’ ‘Give me $50,000.’” “‘Oh, it’s your second offense? That’s $100,000.’ ‘That’s your third offense? $200,000.’” “What job is like that in the world? Where you make a mistake at your job, and they come, and they go, ‘Hey, we’re going to take your salary away.’” “And then people are like, ‘Yeah, you should take his salary away.’ And I’m like [throws his hands up in the air].” A visibly frustrated Tom Brady shares how much he “hates” the NFL’s fine system. He asks what kind of job says: “Hey, we’re going to take your salary away” when you make a mistake. He also can’t stand that some fans cheer when players get slapped with $100,000 fines. “I hate the fact that you sign a contract for $2 million a year, $5 million a year, and it’s so easy for someone to say, ‘Give me $75,000,’ ‘Give me $50,000.’” “‘Oh, it’s your second offense? That’s $100,000.’ ‘That’s your third offense? $200,000.’” “What job is like that in the world? Where you make a mistake at your job, and they come, and they go, ‘Hey, we’re going to take your salary away.’” “And then people are like, ‘Yeah, you should take his salary away.’ And I’m like [throws his hands up in the air].”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

123,145 views • 1 month ago

What another AMAZING “coincidence” California had just passed new tax laws, if your home burns down and you don’t rebuild within 2 years (impossible in California) you lose your tax basis. Your property taxes SKYROCKET to the new values of the property “Think about a home that was purchased many years ago for $5 million. Let's say they were paying $65,000 a year in property taxes. Property goes up a lot over time, especially in these areas. Maybe the value today is $30 million. They go to rebuild it. If it was not, if they couldn't transfer the tax basis, you're looking at like $400,000 a year that they would have to pay” “In 2020, California voters approved a bill that basically said that if your house burns down in a fire, you can transfer the tax basis of that property to something that you buy or something that you build. But you only have two years to do it.” So some of the most expensive homes and properties the entire world now will get reassessed to pay maximum property tax values….

What another AMAZING “coincidence” California had just passed new tax laws, if your home burns down and you don’t rebuild within 2 years (impossible in California) you lose your tax basis. Your property taxes SKYROCKET to the new values of the property “Think about a home that was purchased many years ago for $5 million. Let's say they were paying $65,000 a year in property taxes. Property goes up a lot over time, especially in these areas. Maybe the value today is $30 million. They go to rebuild it. If it was not, if they couldn't transfer the tax basis, you're looking at like $400,000 a year that they would have to pay” “In 2020, California voters approved a bill that basically said that if your house burns down in a fire, you can transfer the tax basis of that property to something that you buy or something that you build. But you only have two years to do it.” So some of the most expensive homes and properties the entire world now will get reassessed to pay maximum property tax values….

Wall Street Apes

3,035,819 views • 1 year ago

Hunted! Spencer Pratt just revealed why he became a Republican: death threats forced him to arm himself and his family for safety. Spencer Pratt “I had so much security and police, and what did they tell me to do? Get a gun. So I got a gun, my wife got a gun… The only people who supported CCWs were Republicans. That was what I aligned with. Once you feel real fear, you want to protect your family.”

Hunted! Spencer Pratt just revealed why he became a Republican: death threats forced him to arm himself and his family for safety. Spencer Pratt “I had so much security and police, and what did they tell me to do? Get a gun. So I got a gun, my wife got a gun… The only people who supported CCWs were Republicans. That was what I aligned with. Once you feel real fear, you want to protect your family.”

jay plemons

164,281 views • 3 months ago

🔸Good day sir_wicknell., 1. Do you recall telling Parliament that your company, Intratek, was just a shelf company that only submitted its certificate of incorporation in the Gwanda Solar Farm tender? 2. Do you stand by your evidence given under oath that your company was a shell and the Gwanda Solar Farm tender bid that you “won” used a foreign company’s balance sheet, profile, methodology and documentation? The whole submission was based on another company and your briefcase company was merely a “local middleman” that brought nothing else to the table? 3. What did you do with the approximately US$5 million that you were paid by ZESA “in advance”? 4. When is the foreign company coming to do the work, if ever? 5. Do you remember saying that this is how all tenders work? For the avoidance of doubt, is this how you win all your tenders? We need new leaders.🇿🇼

Fadzayi Mahere🇿🇼

25,366 views • 11 months ago

Excuse me? Did you cause any distress? Is that what you’re asking Mr. Green? Jennifer McCabe, what do you think, is this apology sufficient enough for what you and your family have gone through for the last two years? I don’t think so! 😡 Karen Read, her attorneys, and the grifters that were paid by the Reads’s, and the Defense, to perpetuate a gross and absolutely bonkers conspiracy theory, for over 2 YEARS!! They all need to be held accountable, for the absolute nightmare that this family has been living in😡 Shame on you, Alan Jackson, David Yannetti, karen read , Aidan Kearney! You will pay for what you e done, if not criminally, than civilly!

Excuse me? Did you cause any distress? Is that what you’re asking Mr. Green? Jennifer McCabe, what do you think, is this apology sufficient enough for what you and your family have gone through for the last two years? I don’t think so! 😡 Karen Read, her attorneys, and the grifters that were paid by the Reads’s, and the Defense, to perpetuate a gross and absolutely bonkers conspiracy theory, for over 2 YEARS!! They all need to be held accountable, for the absolute nightmare that this family has been living in😡 Shame on you, Alan Jackson, David Yannetti, karen read , Aidan Kearney! You will pay for what you e done, if not criminally, than civilly!

Andie Dufrense

28,522 views • 2 years ago

Shaquille O'Neal explains how he found the financial advisor who helped him build generational wealth "I got a call from the bank manager, who was a family friend, and he asked me if I knew how to read bank statements. I said, 'Yeah, I learned it in school.' I was reading it and realized I was already $80,000 in the hole. He looked at me and said, 'Son, I watched you play here in high school. You're a bright, smart young man. I don't want you to be like all these other athletes.'" "So I met with a whole bunch of financial advisors. Guys were telling me, 'You're gonna get $40 million on your first contract. Give me the $40 million and I'll turn it into $200 million by the time you're 23.' Then I met this one little Jewish man who said, 'I'm into savings bonds. We're gonna put your money away and start a corporation for your family so you can write things off.' I said, 'You know what? I'm going with you, sir.'"

Shaquille O'Neal explains how he found the financial advisor who helped him build generational wealth "I got a call from the bank manager, who was a family friend, and he asked me if I knew how to read bank statements. I said, 'Yeah, I learned it in school.' I was reading it and realized I was already $80,000 in the hole. He looked at me and said, 'Son, I watched you play here in high school. You're a bright, smart young man. I don't want you to be like all these other athletes.'" "So I met with a whole bunch of financial advisors. Guys were telling me, 'You're gonna get $40 million on your first contract. Give me the $40 million and I'll turn it into $200 million by the time you're 23.' Then I met this one little Jewish man who said, 'I'm into savings bonds. We're gonna put your money away and start a corporation for your family so you can write things off.' I said, 'You know what? I'm going with you, sir.'"

Mikli

2,761,517 views • 1 month ago

U.S. Department Press Briefing – April 17, 2024 Sam, go ahead. QUESTION: Thanks. Euro-Med Monitor Euro-Med Monitor, human rights monitor, reports that Israel is using drones to lure residents and then shoot them. They explain the sounds of women screaming and babies crying were heard late at night on both Sunday and Monday. When some of the residents went out to investigate and tried to help, they were shot at by Israeli – quadcopter drones. The sounds they heard were in fact records played by the Israeli drones with the intent of forcing the camp residents out into the streets where they could be easily targeted by snipers and other weaponry. MR PATEL: I have not – I have not seen that report, Sam, so I’m not going to comment on it. But broadly – not relating to this particular circumstance at all – because, again, I haven’t seen the report and I’m not sure if it’s accurate or verifiable – at every conversation that we have with our partners in Israel, we continue to stress the moral and strategic imperative that they have to work on deconfliction mechanisms and to ensure that civilian harm is minimized in every which-way possible. And we’ll continue to stress that every way we can. Go ahead. QUESTION: Will you look at this report? MR PATEL: I’m sure we’ll look at this report, Sam. I don’t have any comment for it – on it right now. QUESTION: Do you recognize — MR PATEL: Go ahead. QUESTION: — the Geneva Conventions as applying in this instance? MR PATEL: I’ve answered your question, Sam. QUESTION: No, you haven’t. MR PATEL: Go ahead. QUESTION: You’ve evaded it, and your colleague deceitfully responded to it. Do you recognize the Geneva Conventions? MR PATEL: Go ahead. QUESTION: It’s a simple question. MR PATEL: Go ahead. QUESTION: Do you recognize the Geneva Conventions as applying to Gaza? MR PATEL: When you interrupt me that’s not – it’s not a matter of — QUESTION: I’m not interrupting you. I’m asking for a simple — MR PATEL: I’m not going to take additional questions. QUESTION: — simple answer to a simple question. MR PATEL: Go ahead. You got two questions. I’m — QUESTION: No, it’s totally – no, I didn’t get two questions. MR PATEL: You did. You — QUESTION: No. MR PATEL: You asked a question about your report — QUESTION: I asked a question and you didn’t (inaudible) — MR PATEL: — and you asked a follow-up. Please go ahead. QUESTION: (Inaudible) you’re not – you’re refusing to answer it. MR PATEL: Go ahead, sir. QUESTION: Do the Geneva Conventions apply to Gaza or not? MR PATEL: Go — QUESTION: Apply to everywhere on the planet except for the Palestinians; isn’t that right? MR PATEL: We continue — QUESTION: Isn’t that U.S. policy? MR PATEL: — to stress everywhere – at everywhere that international humanitarian law —

U.S. Department Press Briefing – April 17, 2024 Sam, go ahead. QUESTION: Thanks. Euro-Med Monitor Euro-Med Monitor, human rights monitor, reports that Israel is using drones to lure residents and then shoot them. They explain the sounds of women screaming and babies crying were heard late at night on both Sunday and Monday. When some of the residents went out to investigate and tried to help, they were shot at by Israeli – quadcopter drones. The sounds they heard were in fact records played by the Israeli drones with the intent of forcing the camp residents out into the streets where they could be easily targeted by snipers and other weaponry. MR PATEL: I have not – I have not seen that report, Sam, so I’m not going to comment on it. But broadly – not relating to this particular circumstance at all – because, again, I haven’t seen the report and I’m not sure if it’s accurate or verifiable – at every conversation that we have with our partners in Israel, we continue to stress the moral and strategic imperative that they have to work on deconfliction mechanisms and to ensure that civilian harm is minimized in every which-way possible. And we’ll continue to stress that every way we can. Go ahead. QUESTION: Will you look at this report? MR PATEL: I’m sure we’ll look at this report, Sam. I don’t have any comment for it – on it right now. QUESTION: Do you recognize — MR PATEL: Go ahead. QUESTION: — the Geneva Conventions as applying in this instance? MR PATEL: I’ve answered your question, Sam. QUESTION: No, you haven’t. MR PATEL: Go ahead. QUESTION: You’ve evaded it, and your colleague deceitfully responded to it. Do you recognize the Geneva Conventions? MR PATEL: Go ahead. QUESTION: It’s a simple question. MR PATEL: Go ahead. QUESTION: Do you recognize the Geneva Conventions as applying to Gaza? MR PATEL: When you interrupt me that’s not – it’s not a matter of — QUESTION: I’m not interrupting you. I’m asking for a simple — MR PATEL: I’m not going to take additional questions. QUESTION: — simple answer to a simple question. MR PATEL: Go ahead. You got two questions. I’m — QUESTION: No, it’s totally – no, I didn’t get two questions. MR PATEL: You did. You — QUESTION: No. MR PATEL: You asked a question about your report — QUESTION: I asked a question and you didn’t (inaudible) — MR PATEL: — and you asked a follow-up. Please go ahead. QUESTION: (Inaudible) you’re not – you’re refusing to answer it. MR PATEL: Go ahead, sir. QUESTION: Do the Geneva Conventions apply to Gaza or not? MR PATEL: Go — QUESTION: Apply to everywhere on the planet except for the Palestinians; isn’t that right? MR PATEL: We continue — QUESTION: Isn’t that U.S. policy? MR PATEL: — to stress everywhere – at everywhere that international humanitarian law —

Ramy Abdu| رامي عبده

176,215 views • 2 years ago

LINDELL TV: "I reported on Biden's kangaroo court for 4 years…Everyone knows that J6 was a Fed-surrection to set you and your supporters up, so my question is what's your gut instinct about the new pipe bomber suspect?…How do you feel about the lead prosecutor on the pipe bomber case, Jocelyn Ballantine, the same prosecutor that allegedly asked a J6er to lie to frame you for J6 when you did nothing wrong?" TRUMP: "I really appreciate that question. It's sort of a statement, and I appreciate it very much. Jocelyn is being looked at. They all have to be looked at. What they're doing is so bad. This was whole Democrat hoax."

LINDELL TV: "I reported on Biden's kangaroo court for 4 years…Everyone knows that J6 was a Fed-surrection to set you and your supporters up, so my question is what's your gut instinct about the new pipe bomber suspect?…How do you feel about the lead prosecutor on the pipe bomber case, Jocelyn Ballantine, the same prosecutor that allegedly asked a J6er to lie to frame you for J6 when you did nothing wrong?" TRUMP: "I really appreciate that question. It's sort of a statement, and I appreciate it very much. Jocelyn is being looked at. They all have to be looked at. What they're doing is so bad. This was whole Democrat hoax."

The Bulwark

136,835 views • 8 months ago

Caller: “I inherited $1.5 million, should I sign a prenuptial agreement?” Dave Ramsey: “If you’re asking the question, you already know the answer. Yes.” Dave Ramsey: “You’re talking about blending a significant amount of assets into a marriage. A prenuptial agreement isn’t about expecting the marriage to fail; it’s about having a clear, mature plan for your future.” “When you have $1.5 million at stake, you need to protect that foundation. It allows you to enter the marriage with total peace of mind, knowing that your financial future is secure and clearly defined.” “Don’t let the awkwardness of the conversation stop you. If this person is the right one, they will understand that being responsible with your financial blessings is part of who you are.”

Caller: “I inherited $1.5 million, should I sign a prenuptial agreement?” Dave Ramsey: “If you’re asking the question, you already know the answer. Yes.” Dave Ramsey: “You’re talking about blending a significant amount of assets into a marriage. A prenuptial agreement isn’t about expecting the marriage to fail; it’s about having a clear, mature plan for your future.” “When you have $1.5 million at stake, you need to protect that foundation. It allows you to enter the marriage with total peace of mind, knowing that your financial future is secure and clearly defined.” “Don’t let the awkwardness of the conversation stop you. If this person is the right one, they will understand that being responsible with your financial blessings is part of who you are.”

HENRY

115,129 views • 2 months ago

Zelensky was moved to tears when answering a question about his children — When your children were little, what did you say to them most often? What did you repeat to them the most when they were children? — a journalist asked the President of Ukraine. — “I love you.” — And what do you say to them now, when they are grown up? — “I miss you…” Volodymyr and Olena Zelensky have two children — a daughter, Oleksandra, who is now 21, and a 13-year-old son, Kyrylo. For the past four years, they have hardly seen their father.

Zelensky was moved to tears when answering a question about his children — When your children were little, what did you say to them most often? What did you repeat to them the most when they were children? — a journalist asked the President of Ukraine. — “I love you.” — And what do you say to them now, when they are grown up? — “I miss you…” Volodymyr and Olena Zelensky have two children — a daughter, Oleksandra, who is now 21, and a 13-year-old son, Kyrylo. For the past four years, they have hardly seen their father.

NEXTA

211,854 views • 2 months ago

Exposing Andy Burnham The Mayor Who Betrayed Grooming Gang Survivors When it comes to protecting politicians reliant on the Muslim bloc vote that shielded Pakistani grooming gangs, one name sits near the top of the cover-up list. Greater Manchester Mayor and would-be Prime Minister - Andy Burnham. Burnham commissioned his so-called Assurance Review into Oldham knowing from the outset it was 'limited'. He then spent more than two years pretending otherwise, and nearly another two years defending its published whitewash. His whitewash. Andy Burnham led the public to believe that there had been NO COVER UP. We now know this was a lie and his Assurance Review was nothing more than a limited, toothless exercise that even failed to secure the testimony of a single grooming gang survivor. Ask Andy Burnham to dare deny this statistic. What Burnham commissioned was not incompetence. You don’t accidentally commission a review with built-in flaws, then accidentally ignore those flaws for years. What Burnham was responsible for was calculated. For years, ordinary people trusted Burnham’s review. They believed someone in power had finally looked properly at the issues that mattered. Even after we exposed his findings as a sham, Burnham kept the pretence alive. That wasn’t a mistake. That was a choice. Burnham only admitted his review was 'limited' after the cover up made world news. And even then, he called for a 'limited' national inquiry. He could have called for a National Inquiry at any point prior. He did not. Guess why? Knowing all of this, why are the legacy media running puff pieces on Andy Burnham as a future Prime Minister instead of investigating his role in covering up for grooming gangs? _________ They silenced victims. They erased evidence. They persecuted whistleblowers, discredited survivors, buried official reports, and protected predators. They thought no one would fight back and that they had got away with what they did. They were wrong My name is Raja Miah. I’m neither a Maggie Oliver or a Tommy Robinson. I’m a political campaigner. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My mission is clear: to expose the cover-up, explain the mechanics of corruption, educate the nation, and show people how to fight back. That’s why they tried to imprison me. They know how dangerous my voice is. This is why they spent 3 years fabricating evidence and trying to falsely prosecute me. And when they failed, the Labour Party tried and failed to sue me. Holding those responsible to account, including those who traded children for votes, won’t happen unless many more of you stand with me. Every day I can continue to campaign, more people learn the truth. I can’t do this alone. If my words have ever helped you make sense of a broken system, if they’ve ever made you feel seen, heard, or hopeful, please don’t scroll past. 🔴 Support the work. This fight is far from over. 👉 There are no paywalls to access any of my work. I share everything for free. I only ask those that can afford to do so to support me with just £3/month or £30/year. That’s 75p a week. Pennies to most - everything to help keep me going. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that covering this up becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE

Exposing Andy Burnham The Mayor Who Betrayed Grooming Gang Survivors When it comes to protecting politicians reliant on the Muslim bloc vote that shielded Pakistani grooming gangs, one name sits near the top of the cover-up list. Greater Manchester Mayor and would-be Prime Minister - Andy Burnham. Burnham commissioned his so-called Assurance Review into Oldham knowing from the outset it was 'limited'. He then spent more than two years pretending otherwise, and nearly another two years defending its published whitewash. His whitewash. Andy Burnham led the public to believe that there had been NO COVER UP. We now know this was a lie and his Assurance Review was nothing more than a limited, toothless exercise that even failed to secure the testimony of a single grooming gang survivor. Ask Andy Burnham to dare deny this statistic. What Burnham commissioned was not incompetence. You don’t accidentally commission a review with built-in flaws, then accidentally ignore those flaws for years. What Burnham was responsible for was calculated. For years, ordinary people trusted Burnham’s review. They believed someone in power had finally looked properly at the issues that mattered. Even after we exposed his findings as a sham, Burnham kept the pretence alive. That wasn’t a mistake. That was a choice. Burnham only admitted his review was 'limited' after the cover up made world news. And even then, he called for a 'limited' national inquiry. He could have called for a National Inquiry at any point prior. He did not. Guess why? Knowing all of this, why are the legacy media running puff pieces on Andy Burnham as a future Prime Minister instead of investigating his role in covering up for grooming gangs? _________ They silenced victims. They erased evidence. They persecuted whistleblowers, discredited survivors, buried official reports, and protected predators. They thought no one would fight back and that they had got away with what they did. They were wrong My name is Raja Miah. I’m neither a Maggie Oliver or a Tommy Robinson. I’m a political campaigner. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. Before that, I spent over a decade safeguarding children and protecting communities from extremists. My mission is clear: to expose the cover-up, explain the mechanics of corruption, educate the nation, and show people how to fight back. That’s why they tried to imprison me. They know how dangerous my voice is. This is why they spent 3 years fabricating evidence and trying to falsely prosecute me. And when they failed, the Labour Party tried and failed to sue me. Holding those responsible to account, including those who traded children for votes, won’t happen unless many more of you stand with me. Every day I can continue to campaign, more people learn the truth. I can’t do this alone. If my words have ever helped you make sense of a broken system, if they’ve ever made you feel seen, heard, or hopeful, please don’t scroll past. 🔴 Support the work. This fight is far from over. 👉 There are no paywalls to access any of my work. I share everything for free. I only ask those that can afford to do so to support me with just £3/month or £30/year. That’s 75p a week. Pennies to most - everything to help keep me going. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No sponsors. No parties. No institutions to lean on. Just numbers. Growing fast enough that covering this up becomes impossible. We don’t need everyone. We need you. – Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

82,400 views • 7 months ago

🚨 He has $45,000,000. She has $3,000,000. And they're trying to figure out a prenup. Him: She's got $3 million. I've got $45 million. Should we have a prenup? Dave: Yes. In your situation, absolutely. Him: She suggested slowly moving some of my separate property into community property over time. Maybe 5% a year. Dave: There's no reason to do that. Him: She wants to feel like we're building something together. Dave: Then don't focus on splitting the assets. Focus on splitting the growth. Him: What do you mean? Dave: You leave with what you entered with. Your $45 million is yours. Her $3 million is hers. Then decide how the growth from this point forward gets shared. Him: That sounds reasonable. Dave: The goal isn't to create a roommate situation where you have to decide who pays for the mustard in the refrigerator. Him: Right. Dave: The goal is to protect what you built before marriage while still building a life together after marriage. One of the smartest lines in this conversation: "You leave with what you entered with. Then you share the growth." That's a much healthier discussion than arguing over who owns what.

🚨 He has $45,000,000. She has $3,000,000. And they're trying to figure out a prenup. Him: She's got $3 million. I've got $45 million. Should we have a prenup? Dave: Yes. In your situation, absolutely. Him: She suggested slowly moving some of my separate property into community property over time. Maybe 5% a year. Dave: There's no reason to do that. Him: She wants to feel like we're building something together. Dave: Then don't focus on splitting the assets. Focus on splitting the growth. Him: What do you mean? Dave: You leave with what you entered with. Your $45 million is yours. Her $3 million is hers. Then decide how the growth from this point forward gets shared. Him: That sounds reasonable. Dave: The goal isn't to create a roommate situation where you have to decide who pays for the mustard in the refrigerator. Him: Right. Dave: The goal is to protect what you built before marriage while still building a life together after marriage. One of the smartest lines in this conversation: "You leave with what you entered with. Then you share the growth." That's a much healthier discussion than arguing over who owns what.

J’ae VESper 🩸

1,504,941 views • 2 months ago

Nancy Guthrie Ashleigh Banfield talking about Sheriff Nanos first press conference vs his recent interview with NBC. "You've known since day one what the suspect was doing there and there's a concern to the public" "Why did my source tell me what your focus was on day 1: You towed the brother in laws car, then you searched their house, you called off the search for Nancy Guthrie, you turned over the scene, and you told the public there was nothing to worry about. What changed Sheriff Nanos?" Seems she has the same question a lot of us do 👀 #NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieMissing #NancyGuthrieKidnapping .

Nancy Guthrie Ashleigh Banfield talking about Sheriff Nanos first press conference vs his recent interview with NBC. "You've known since day one what the suspect was doing there and there's a concern to the public" "Why did my source tell me what your focus was on day 1: You towed the brother in laws car, then you searched their house, you called off the search for Nancy Guthrie, you turned over the scene, and you told the public there was nothing to worry about. What changed Sheriff Nanos?" Seems she has the same question a lot of us do 👀 #NancyGuthrie #NancyGuthrieMissing #NancyGuthrieKidnapping .

𝘛𝘳𝘶𝘦𝘊𝘳𝘪𝘮𝘦𝘉𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘣𝘦𝘳🫶🏼

211,314 views • 5 months ago

You’ve built something very valuable for a private equity group to acquire. You’ve either started a company from scratch or acquired one; you then operated and scaled it. After 5-10+ years, you sold a majority to a PE firm (cash and rolled minority equity); then several more years later you receive the “second bite of the apple”, larger than the first cash payment. A major liquidity and wealth milestone for you and your family, maybe beyond your dreams. But here’s the question no one asks: Now that you have wealth…how do you keep it? Two scenarios: A gentleman sold his construction company for $20 million. Within a year, half was gone. He had “diversified” into venture capital, luxury condos, and private crypto funds. He was chasing shiny objects. Contrast that with another entrepreneur who sold his HVAC business for the same amount. He put 60% into municipal bonds and short-term Treasuries, then took his time deciding what to do with the rest. The lesson: You don’t need to swing hard after you’ve already hit the home run. Build the wealth, then preserve and compound for today, tomorrow and future generations. In this episode, I break down the two-bucket philosophy: - Capital Preservation - Balanced and Compounded Growth I hope it gets you thinking about how to preserve and compound your wealth...starting today. Timestamps: 0:00 The hidden question after success: what do you do with the money? 1:30 Builders vs. stewards: different skill sets, same discipline 2:00 How legacy families preserve wealth for generations 2:30 "From rice field to rice field" 4:00 The simple fundamentals wealthy families follow 4:20 Why complexity sells, but simplicity endures 5:45 The two-bucket philosophy: preservation and compounding 6:01 Pillar #1: Conservative fixed income (your stability base) 6:40 Story: The entrepreneur who lost half his fortune chasing returns 7:22 Sponsor: CapitalBad - the marketplace for long-term investors 8:16 Pillar #2: High income strategy (living off cash flow) 9:12 Example: The Midwestern family that compounds quietly 9:15 Pillar #3: Long-term growth (own great companies for decades) 10:05 Compounding only works if you let it 10:59 Consumption vs. compounding: every generation’s choice 11:45 Structure, simplicity, and temperament in wealth management 12:00 Can you manage yourself as well as you managed your company?

You’ve built something very valuable for a private equity group to acquire. You’ve either started a company from scratch or acquired one; you then operated and scaled it. After 5-10+ years, you sold a majority to a PE firm (cash and rolled minority equity); then several more years later you receive the “second bite of the apple”, larger than the first cash payment. A major liquidity and wealth milestone for you and your family, maybe beyond your dreams. But here’s the question no one asks: Now that you have wealth…how do you keep it? Two scenarios: A gentleman sold his construction company for $20 million. Within a year, half was gone. He had “diversified” into venture capital, luxury condos, and private crypto funds. He was chasing shiny objects. Contrast that with another entrepreneur who sold his HVAC business for the same amount. He put 60% into municipal bonds and short-term Treasuries, then took his time deciding what to do with the rest. The lesson: You don’t need to swing hard after you’ve already hit the home run. Build the wealth, then preserve and compound for today, tomorrow and future generations. In this episode, I break down the two-bucket philosophy: - Capital Preservation - Balanced and Compounded Growth I hope it gets you thinking about how to preserve and compound your wealth...starting today. Timestamps: 0:00 The hidden question after success: what do you do with the money? 1:30 Builders vs. stewards: different skill sets, same discipline 2:00 How legacy families preserve wealth for generations 2:30 "From rice field to rice field" 4:00 The simple fundamentals wealthy families follow 4:20 Why complexity sells, but simplicity endures 5:45 The two-bucket philosophy: preservation and compounding 6:01 Pillar #1: Conservative fixed income (your stability base) 6:40 Story: The entrepreneur who lost half his fortune chasing returns 7:22 Sponsor: CapitalBad - the marketplace for long-term investors 8:16 Pillar #2: High income strategy (living off cash flow) 9:12 Example: The Midwestern family that compounds quietly 9:15 Pillar #3: Long-term growth (own great companies for decades) 10:05 Compounding only works if you let it 10:59 Consumption vs. compounding: every generation’s choice 11:45 Structure, simplicity, and temperament in wealth management 12:00 Can you manage yourself as well as you managed your company?

PrivateEquityGuy (Mikk Markus)

38,035 views • 10 months ago

🚨Marcos Wealth is NOT “Ill-Gotten Wealth” This is what many of us have been waiting to hear: the President directly addressing the Marcos family wealth and clarifying that it was NEVER ill-gotten. Honestly, that single issue was my only hesitation before fully supporting PBBM way back in 2021. When you actually read the court decisions surrounding this issue, nowhere does it state that money was stolen from the people nor was it public funds. In fact, most of this “wealth” was not in the form of cash! So, we truly have been misled by mainstream media narratives for decades! I have a general idea of the origin of this wealth. It goes further back to earlier generations, well before Marcos Sr became a politician. It’s a deep story, and one I hope the President eventually shares with the nation before his term ends. This also explains why no billionaire can sway or bribe the President. How do you buy influence over someone who is already FAR wealthier than you are? As for how that wealth is being used? Just look at what is being accomplished in this administration. Seeing what’s happening in the country right now, you can tell the legend wasn't just a story, after all. It’s real. Video source: Foreign Correspondent Association of the Philippines (FOCAP) Presidential Luncheon; August 14, 2026

🚨Marcos Wealth is NOT “Ill-Gotten Wealth” This is what many of us have been waiting to hear: the President directly addressing the Marcos family wealth and clarifying that it was NEVER ill-gotten. Honestly, that single issue was my only hesitation before fully supporting PBBM way back in 2021. When you actually read the court decisions surrounding this issue, nowhere does it state that money was stolen from the people nor was it public funds. In fact, most of this “wealth” was not in the form of cash! So, we truly have been misled by mainstream media narratives for decades! I have a general idea of the origin of this wealth. It goes further back to earlier generations, well before Marcos Sr became a politician. It’s a deep story, and one I hope the President eventually shares with the nation before his term ends. This also explains why no billionaire can sway or bribe the President. How do you buy influence over someone who is already FAR wealthier than you are? As for how that wealth is being used? Just look at what is being accomplished in this administration. Seeing what’s happening in the country right now, you can tell the legend wasn't just a story, after all. It’s real. Video source: Foreign Correspondent Association of the Philippines (FOCAP) Presidential Luncheon; August 14, 2026

Thea Tan

13,647 views • 11 days ago

Qullamaggie on How Long to Go From 9k to 1 Million “How did you go from 5K to 1 million? That’s for losers. I think I did it in 8 years. No, no, no. You know what, I’ll check. I went from 5K — let’s see, from 2013. So my accounts were actually 9K on May 20, 2013. That was the turning point for my trading. May happened. I was down like 50% on the year, and that was the turning point. So in May 2013 I had 90K in my trading accounts. Let’s see when I hit 1 million. January 2018, I hit 1.4 million. So somewhere in December 2017 my account reached 1 million. It took about three and a half years to get from 9K to 1 million. If you have a small account, guys, it’s not hard to make a few hundred percent per year. It’s not hard if you have a small account. Really, you can make it if you’re a short-term swing trader. You can make most years probably easily a couple hundred percent. And that’s the thing — you won’t have a small account after a few years. That’s the beautiful part.”

Qullamaggie on How Long to Go From 9k to 1 Million “How did you go from 5K to 1 million? That’s for losers. I think I did it in 8 years. No, no, no. You know what, I’ll check. I went from 5K — let’s see, from 2013. So my accounts were actually 9K on May 20, 2013. That was the turning point for my trading. May happened. I was down like 50% on the year, and that was the turning point. So in May 2013 I had 90K in my trading accounts. Let’s see when I hit 1 million. January 2018, I hit 1.4 million. So somewhere in December 2017 my account reached 1 million. It took about three and a half years to get from 9K to 1 million. If you have a small account, guys, it’s not hard to make a few hundred percent per year. It’s not hard if you have a small account. Really, you can make it if you’re a short-term swing trader. You can make most years probably easily a couple hundred percent. And that’s the thing — you won’t have a small account after a few years. That’s the beautiful part.”

Lone

47,019 views • 4 months ago

Time for people to stop and listen. Look what was being shared 3 years ago, the message is exactly the same You will get your foundation watching these and it will only be up to you to go and watch With everything we are witnessing now it will provide more clarity and above anything else it will give you a foundation Answer this one question…. When have we ever lost control? #harrythesoulcoach #donaldtrump #truth #awakening #maga

Time for people to stop and listen. Look what was being shared 3 years ago, the message is exactly the same You will get your foundation watching these and it will only be up to you to go and watch With everything we are witnessing now it will provide more clarity and above anything else it will give you a foundation Answer this one question…. When have we ever lost control? #harrythesoulcoach #donaldtrump #truth #awakening #maga

Harry The Soul Coach

217,891 views • 11 months ago

Mark Cuban says Peacock paid $100,000,000 for ONE NFL game and made TV ratings irrelevant "It's not about ratings anymore. We like to cover you guys love to talk about ratings. Ratings are irrelevant." "What broke the bank for everybody and was a blessing to all sports teams was when Peacock spent $100 million on the NFL and got one game and got three million subscribers and retained all of them. That became the benchmark." "When you have 60, 70% of whatever it is of your revenue coming from basically one industry, we would give you shit on Shark Tank."

Mark Cuban says Peacock paid $100,000,000 for ONE NFL game and made TV ratings irrelevant "It's not about ratings anymore. We like to cover you guys love to talk about ratings. Ratings are irrelevant." "What broke the bank for everybody and was a blessing to all sports teams was when Peacock spent $100 million on the NFL and got one game and got three million subscribers and retained all of them. That became the benchmark." "When you have 60, 70% of whatever it is of your revenue coming from basically one industry, we would give you shit on Shark Tank."

Arslan

606,733 views • 2 months ago