Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨 EMILY THORBERRY THROWS A HAND GRENADE AT STARMER! 'Doesn't this look like that getting Mandelson the job was a priority that overrode everything else and security considerations were second order?' Listen to Starmer's reply at (1:15) he can barely speak. He knows it's over

287,775 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Claim: Lazar Can't Show Us Why He Attended MIT Because He Doesn't Want to Risk Prison "[Lazar] had said he was at MIT, and that he was at Caltech." ~Dolan (No, Lazar said he had DEGREES from both. Surprised Dolan (Richard Dolan Intelligent Disclosure) downplayed that.) Luigi Venditelli (LV): "As far as things that I can say, [Lazar] shared with me, shared it also with my team, and also shared it with Joe Rogan in the past, in regards to his education...because that's something that I think a lot of people really attack Bob Lazar on, and rightfully so. Because if he doesn't have a paper to bring out, they can attack him. It's an easy, it's a low-hanging fruit attack for somebody who doesn't believe the story. "In regards to the MIT component, the only thing I can say is that there were national security issues there, okay?" (No, what you can say is that Lazar CLAIMED there were national security issues there. Unless you have proof that you're not sharing?) Dolan: "For people who don't know this, we'll just explain: Bob had said he was at MIT, and that he was at Caltech and no one was able to find or get any kind of confirmation that he was at those schools." (Lazar didn't just claim that he was AT those schools. He claimed he had degrees from both. This is from the 1993 Lazar Q&A at Rachel, Nevada near Area 51. Lazar: "As far as electronic technology, my degree there is from Caltech and physics is from MIT. [MIT] was a master's degree.") ~ LV: "Correct. Now, what's also important to note, specifically about MIT, is the one I wanna highlight, is that he said, 'I wasn't alone in this.' So, the government itself - he was at Los Alamos National Labs when this happened - he was sent to MIT." (Again, if LV wants to come across as unbiased and trying to get to the truth, he should be saying, "Lazar CLAIMS he was at Los Alamos and was then sent to MIT.") LV: "Now, the reason why this is important is because, and he also said, 'Not everything the government does or was doing was legal.' Okay? So there were things that were actually not necessarily legal, and they needed some scientists to go and learn certain things at MIT, and that's the reason why he was there. And there were other people there. "He said to me, 'Look, for me to bring this out, I would be revealing things that would, potentially, put other people in a compromising situation.' This had nothing...signed papers, something to do with national security. And he says, 'There's no reason for me to ruin other people's lives just to satisfy a small percentage of people who are constantly bickering about my education.'" (I don't think it's a small percentage. OK, so Bob, supposedly, says/claims he doesn't want to talk about the government allegedly sending him to MIT because he doesn't want to put other people in a compromising situation.) LV: "So, I understand that part. It's frustrating that it cannot be mentioned, but it it's also something that I understood, and it made perfect sense to me." (So Lazar can't mention any of it but LV can?) LV: "Now, I know it's frustrating to all of those who say we should still have something. Well, unfortunately, he's not gonna want to go to jail just to satisfy you." (So first it was: He doesn't want to "bring this out" because it would put people in a compromising situation and now it's: He doesn't want to risk prison. Which is it? How about we get that directly from Lazar instead of second hand?) LV: "And he would not be the only person ever to have been implicated in national security programs that were sending scientists to MIT. So that's a very important thing to also look into for history."

Joe Murgia

32,303 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dodgy Deals, Blackmail and Firebombs... MCSWEENEY TO CIVIL SERVANTS RE MANDELSON: JUST. FUCKING. APPROVE. IT. In the select Committee Meeting today, with three men sitting uncomfortably, wondering whether an F Bomb was appropriate, the only person prepared to give an unedited, unredacted version of McSweeney's Bullying and Intimidation was a woman: "Dame Emily Thornberry, the chairman of the foreign affairs committee, claimed Sir Olly’s predecessor had been told to “just f---ing approve” the appointment" Well Said, Dame Emily. Harsh Realities: Deals, Blackmail and FIREBOMBS. Has anyone thought to ask Starmer just WHY it was so vital that Mandelson was appointed? The Palentir NHS Deal, which Mandelson engineered, at a private meeting with Starmer, unknown at the time to be at that meeting in Washington, was the reason. THIEL WANTED THE NHS DEAL TO DESTROY THE INSTITUTION AND REPLACE IT WITH PRIVATE INSURANCE MANDELSON ASSURED THIEL, ANOTHER CLOSE FRIEND OF THE PAEDOPHILE, EPSTEIN, THAT STARMER COULD BE "BOUGHT AND SOLD" IF KEPT IN NUMBER 10 FOR TWO TERMS, AND FINANCE WAS NEEDED TO MAKE THAT A REALITY. STARMER ASSURED MANDELSON THE AMBASSADOR JOB WAS HIS, AND HIS DREADFUL PAST ERASED TO PUSH THAT OVER THE LINE. All the Players in this Farce were Corrupt and all wanted their own Corner. Thiel and Plantir got the NHS Mandelson got the job he coveted and his % Starmer mistook his power and influence and forced the appointment in such a shoddy way it was bound to, ahem, rebound. WHICH IT DID -- SPECTACULARLY. For Starmer to come out of this with any honour or credibility: He would admit Thiel bribed him. He would admit he promised Mandelson the job. He would admit it all fell to crap, and all he has left is a few more weeks of lies and shame before the elections he wanted to ban. AND NOW WE KNOW WHY. Never mind the upcoming Trials of the Young Ukrainian men wishing to firebomb property belonging to the PM and family. THAT TRIAL WILL BE DELAYED TILL 2027. What a Tangled Web We Weave... #StarmerOut #LocalElections

Pete Sanford

21,495 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨SKY NEWS PUTS STARMER ON THE SPOT AND CALLS OUT HIS BS: “WE DON’T BELIEVE YOU ON MANDELSON VETTING SCANDAL!” 🤯 Starmer’s Furious Act Over Mandelson Vetting Scandal Falls Flat 🤨 Sky News put Keir Starmer firmly on the spot over the Peter Mandelson ambassador scandal. Prime Minister once again doing his best “I’m innocent and I’m FURIOUS” impression over the Mandelson scandal. Yeah course you are Keir, we believe you 🙃 The man is out here claiming it’s “unforgivable” and “staggering” that he wasn’t told Mandelson failed security vetting. Oh please. Does he really believe he’s convincing ANYONE that he didn’t know? He’s delusional! Of course he f*cking knew! Sky News basically said it to his face: “Are you really expecting us to believe that a senior civil servant, off his own back, without any sort of direction about the importance of Peter Mandelson being Ambassador, unilaterally overruled security vetting to approve a political appointment?” Starmer’s nervous robot response? Just repeated the same line like a broken record: “I was not told that he had failed security vetting. No minister or No 10 was told…” The reporter put it to him that he’s been prime minister for 2 years now and it sounds like he doesn’t have a grip on his government, but the robot just kept glitching, repeating the exact same talking points. He knows he’s lying, we know he’s lying, and he knows we know he’s lying. 🤥

J Stewart

152,000 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten