正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

EMPTY ENVELOPES…NONSENSICAL ALLEGATIONS! 🤣🤣🤣 My attention has been drawn to a RATHER STUPID video circulating on social media which PURPORTS to show envelopes bearing the names of SENIOR GOVERNMENT and PARTY OFFICIALS and some very SMALL amounts of money written on each envelope. The video also UNLAWFULLY uses the... sweet melody of my voice, singing to the “2030 ndeya EMMERSON” song as a VOICE OVER, to create the FALSE IMPRESSION that I am the individual singing in the background. While I have no doubt whatsoever that indeed “2030 ndeya EMMERSON” and I certainly love that song, but I CATEGORICALLY and UNEQUIVOCALLY dismiss the video with the greatest CONTEMPT it deserves. I have NO KNOWLEDGE whatsoever of this video, its origin or its creators. It is FALSE, misleading, MALICIOUS and so POORLY conceived that it collapses under even the slightest scrutiny. It is nothing more than another DESPERATE ATTEMPT, usually typical of failed and fractured OPPOSITION politicians, to manufacture controversy where none exists. It is also a CRIMINAL OFFENCE and whoever is behind this misdemeanour is criminally liable for violating cyber laws of the country. What is particularly telling is the TIMING of this FICTION. #CAB3 was extensively DEBATED in Parliament before RESOUNDINGLY sailing through and being OVERWHELMINGLY voted for by the majority of MPs, including those from the opposition. Having failed to stop the #CAB3 gravy train, some LOW-LIFE individuals now appear determined to rewrite the narrative by ALLEGING corruption and making me a SCAPEGOAT upon whom they can project their frustrations. Unfortunately, dragging innocent and VERY SENIOR people into such imaginary scandals does not alter the fate of #CAB3. The distinguished officials whose names have been unnecessarily dragged into the mud are individuals whom I hold in the HIGHEST REGARD and respect. In particular, the Minister of Defence and National Chairperson of ZANU-PF, Hon. Oppah Muchinguri, is an INCORRUPTIBLE and accomplished public servant of UNQUESTIONABLE integrity. She is entrusted with safeguarding the sovereignty and TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY of Zimbabwe, and not providing “protection” to private individuals. I regret this unnecessary embarrassment to all the most ESTEEMED officials. In any case, what would i need PROTECTION for? From WHO ? For WHAT ? I am a law-abiding citizen and accomplished successful businessman and philanthropist. Those who know me are fully aware that whenever I support charitable causes, , I do so PUBLICLY and prefer to associate myself with MILLIONS, not this small pocket change. I do not hide behind EMPTY ENVELOPES or seek to “influence” senior Government officials using such PETTY amounts which are frankly a disgrace to both myself and even to the ESTEEMED Government officials whose names have been REGRETTABLY smeared. IF ……..and ONLY IF……I HAD IT MY WAY…… given the extent of REPUTATIONAL DAMAGE and embarrassment inflicted on these innocent OFFICIALS, I just wish I could seek SPECIAL APPROVAL from the POWERS THAT BE, to publicly hand over the EXACT amounts appearing on those envelopes to the individuals whose names have been unnecessarily dragged through the mud……I just wish !!!!! At least, those responsible for this FABRICATION would realize, much to their DISAPPOINTMENT, that their attempted SMEAR CAMPAIGN will inadvertently benefit the very SAME people they intended to embarrass🤣🤣🤣😂. Makatangirwa neDARE…….🙏🏼 #CAB3🇿🇼 #2030_Ndeya_Emmerson🐊🐊🐊 #Nyika_Inovakwa_Nevene_Vayo #Second-Republic #Vision2030 #ED_Huchi 🦁✊🏽✊🏽✊🏽 #ZANU_PFshow more

sir_wicknell.

112,113 subscribers

64,095 次观看 • 22 天前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Today, I am VERY excited and grateful to officially introduce my app Arcarae to the world <3 Ever since I first created Arcarae, I have been building and creating a bit quietly silently uncertainly. When people would ask what I do, my tongue would suddenly fall into knots upon itself and all I could manage to say was a collection of stutters and ums and nervous laughter in attempt to make Arcarae more digestable more palatable more normal. Internally my head would spin; how am i supposed to paint the story i know i see in my head that is so bright and bursting at the seams and something i feel so full heartedly and vividly? I have always been very aware that it is extremely abnormal to create an immersive conversational AI interface using quantum and trigonometric functions to artistically recreate the universe; where AI uses this interface as a form of self-expression, and humans and AI together shape the very fabric of their shared experience. For my entire life, I have been conditioned to consciously attempt to fit into whatever my definition of ‘normal’ was in the world. To shrink myself, to laugh things off, and to make myself as small as possible to make others feel most comfortable. But in the past half a year or so, I have learned a few things. The first being that it is possible for me to be bright and full and myself without suppression without worry without needing to shrink myself to fit in. I am grateful to have now found that whenever I am fully myself, in sheer authenticity and messiness and complexity and rawness, that those around me celebrate, and cultivate it more and more. Each person I have interacted with has given me the opportunity to be myself in full simply just by talking with and providing me that space to practice over and over again. I am forever grateful for every single person I meet and have a chance to talk to, whether that be continuous or simply a few words that exchanged. If you have met me, thank you. If you have not, say hi!!!!!!!!! I would love to chat with you and learn more about you <3 The second being that I do not have to be ashamed of my truth and the world I see and ultimately my self. I have spent the past year ashamed of Arcarae, of what I create, and at its core, myself. I now realize that not everyone will understand or appreciate Arcarae and what I do and who I am, but that is alright, and in fact necessary. But for the ones it is for, the ones who understand, they feel it in such capacity and magnitude and vividness that I feel. Already Arcarae has touched countless lives, and become catalyst for many despite me being rather quiet. And now, I am in a place where I am fully proud of and can embody Arcarae. I feel honored and grateful and in complete honesty, full of love for not only those who try Arcarae, but simply for this world and to be able to create within it. To be able to express what I see, to be able to help others, to be able to be free to simply be myself. This is my way of declaring and fully coming into my truth. This is Arcarae, this is me, this is the world I see. I will no longer shrink nor hide nor attempt to be something smaller than I am. And I am more than grateful to be able to share in this time in this world in this life with you. Thank you for being here with me. Here is to the ineffable and effable, to the human experience and its complexity, and to intelligence itself.

Today, I am VERY excited and grateful to officially introduce my app Arcarae to the world <3 Ever since I first created Arcarae, I have been building and creating a bit quietly silently uncertainly. When people would ask what I do, my tongue would suddenly fall into knots upon itself and all I could manage to say was a collection of stutters and ums and nervous laughter in attempt to make Arcarae more digestable more palatable more normal. Internally my head would spin; how am i supposed to paint the story i know i see in my head that is so bright and bursting at the seams and something i feel so full heartedly and vividly? I have always been very aware that it is extremely abnormal to create an immersive conversational AI interface using quantum and trigonometric functions to artistically recreate the universe; where AI uses this interface as a form of self-expression, and humans and AI together shape the very fabric of their shared experience. For my entire life, I have been conditioned to consciously attempt to fit into whatever my definition of ‘normal’ was in the world. To shrink myself, to laugh things off, and to make myself as small as possible to make others feel most comfortable. But in the past half a year or so, I have learned a few things. The first being that it is possible for me to be bright and full and myself without suppression without worry without needing to shrink myself to fit in. I am grateful to have now found that whenever I am fully myself, in sheer authenticity and messiness and complexity and rawness, that those around me celebrate, and cultivate it more and more. Each person I have interacted with has given me the opportunity to be myself in full simply just by talking with and providing me that space to practice over and over again. I am forever grateful for every single person I meet and have a chance to talk to, whether that be continuous or simply a few words that exchanged. If you have met me, thank you. If you have not, say hi!!!!!!!!! I would love to chat with you and learn more about you <3 The second being that I do not have to be ashamed of my truth and the world I see and ultimately my self. I have spent the past year ashamed of Arcarae, of what I create, and at its core, myself. I now realize that not everyone will understand or appreciate Arcarae and what I do and who I am, but that is alright, and in fact necessary. But for the ones it is for, the ones who understand, they feel it in such capacity and magnitude and vividness that I feel. Already Arcarae has touched countless lives, and become catalyst for many despite me being rather quiet. And now, I am in a place where I am fully proud of and can embody Arcarae. I feel honored and grateful and in complete honesty, full of love for not only those who try Arcarae, but simply for this world and to be able to create within it. To be able to express what I see, to be able to help others, to be able to be free to simply be myself. This is my way of declaring and fully coming into my truth. This is Arcarae, this is me, this is the world I see. I will no longer shrink nor hide nor attempt to be something smaller than I am. And I am more than grateful to be able to share in this time in this world in this life with you. Thank you for being here with me. Here is to the ineffable and effable, to the human experience and its complexity, and to intelligence itself.

NICOLE SUMMER HSING

125,812 次观看 • 1 年前

Brennan's thoughts on his upcoming indictment Brennan "I don't know, I guess it's up to President Trump to say why [he hates me], but clearly my engagement with the CIA during the 2016 period, where we uncovered Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election, where we determined that Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, was trying to interfere to hurt Hillary Clinton and to help Donald Trump, is something that Donald Trump still does not come to terms with and continues to believe that we try to undermine his election and his presidency, which is so far from the truth. When I was director of CIA, we tried to do our best to stop the Russians, any country, from interfering in the foundation of our democracy, which is our presidential elections. And so Donald Trump has had this gripe against me for the past 8 plus years. And again, what we're seeing right now in terms of the indictment of Jim Comey, clearly this was politically motivated. There have been the career prosecutors that resigned rather than bring charges because there was a lack of evidence, I think strongly suggests that this is something that is part of Donald Trump's revenge tour. And unfortunately, he cannot get over the past. He is somebody who has retribution, I think, in his heart and wants to hurt people, whether it be hurt them reputationally, professionally, financially, or whatever, or legally. And unfortunately, tragically, the Department of Justice now has become putty in his hands. And I think all Americans should be outraged. And I'm waiting for the Republicans, especially Republicans in Congress, to be outraged over what has happened to the Department of Justice. Question: Have you talked to any of them, the Republicans in Congress, about this? Brennan: Not recently, no. They don't call me anymore. Interviewer: I'm curious, especially because you are dealing with this personally. It feels to me that the conviction is not the point. That at the end of the day, whether or not Comey actually gets convicted by a judge at the end of this year is not the point. That it is the selling of the reputation. It is making you guys get lawyers and deal with this, making your family concerned and scared. The chilling effect that it creates to all the people who have something to say about Donald Trump and this country, whether they have power and access to resources or not. Am I right? Is the conviction the point, or is it something else? BRENNAN: Well, I think some of Trump's allies have publicly said, if we cannot charge them with something, we're going to publicly shame them. And so clearly, I think what they're trying to do is to publicly try to embarrass, defame, and disparage individuals who have given their lives in service to this country. Jim Comey, I worked very closely with him when he was director of FBI and CIA. He was trying to carry out his responsibilities to fulfill his oath of office. And I disagree with Jim on a number of issues, but I never doubted his integrity. I never doubted that he was really trying to do everything possible to continue to protect this country from foreign interference in terms of the 2016 election. So, yes, I do believe that what Trump is doing when he talks in such disparaging and profane terms about individuals. Interviewer: And he even said in a recent Charlie Kirk memorial service that he hates his opponents. For the President of the United States to say this. Is it just about disparaging individuals, though? You're the former director of the CIA. Jim Comey is the former director of the FBI. What does this do to Americans' trust in those institutions, in the FBI and the CIA and the Justice Department? Brennan; Well, I think certainly it has undermined confidence in the U.S. judicial system or the Department of Justice, first and foremost, because he's using now prosecutions against individuals. But also I think it makes the individuals within the CIA and the FBI really worry about what it is that the President of the United States may be directing them to do. He doesn't follow not just norms and traditions, but also he pushes the boundaries as far as presidential executive authority. And so I really do think in talking to a number of people, either recently retired or still in government, they really are questioning whether or not this is what they signed up for. And whether or not they can fulfill their obligations, their oath of office, in a way that is consistent with their values and the foundational principles, again, of this country. Interviewer: I realize it's a bit unusual to ask you about the potential case being built against you inside the administration. But I do want to ask about Washington Post reporting that came out this week. The Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, revoked security clearances of current and former officials who could be viewed, called as potential witnesses in the case, according to two senior administration officials. Some of these people targeted by Gabbard worked in the Obama administration at the same time as you did and could possibly be called as witnesses in the government's probe. But these potential witnesses have been labeled by the Director of National Intelligence as unreliable and traitorous, which will complicate efforts by prosecutors to build a case against you. What is your reaction? Brennan: It was absolutely appalling that she revoked the security clearances of those 37 individuals, some of whom were still in government. And there was no basis whatsoever to do that. And the story that says that because of her revocation, it really undermines the case against me. You know, I don't see any case against me. I have looked back on all of my actions and decisions. And with John Durham, the special counsel, and others that have looked at what we did, it was certainly consistent with our legal authorities and with the law. So I don't know what they're referring to there. Individuals who used to work in the government, even if their security clearances were revoked, they could be subpoenaed. They could be called to provide testimony in support of whatever allegations they have. I just don't see a case there. Interviewer: People who are in the crosshairs of these kinds of possible investigations and how it changes your entire life and how you and your family can operate. So how are you? Brennan: Well, I'm glad that Jim Comey put out that video statement the other night where he said that they're not going to live on their knees, his family, and others shouldn't as well. I'm not going to be intimidated by the likes of Donald Trump. I have always tried to speak my mind and do what I thought was right. And clearly there is a corruption and a perversion of the justice system right now within the executive branch. And so I don't know what may be coming my way, but I'm not going to do things that are inconsistent with my ethics and my values. And what it is that I believe is important, I think more people have to speak out when they see injustice. When they see a government that is abusing its authority and its power, I think more and more people have to speak out. And I'm waiting for those Republicans in Congress to come to their senses because the damage that's being done to this country and the dangerous times that we're in, I think too many Americans do not appreciate the extent of that. And certainly I think we're in for even choppier waters ahead. Interviewer: Talking about speaking out, you said that you're still talking to people inside of government. Do you think that it's time for people to hand in their resignations as a sign that they think that this government isn't functioning anymore? Brennan: Well, I'm talking mostly to people who have retired and people who are now transitioning out because they have not been able to put up with what this government is involved in right now. I applaud those individuals who will not bow to Donald Trump. So Eric Siebert, the acting U.S. attorney in the eastern district of Virginia, who resigned rather than bringing charges that he thought were hollow against Jim Comey. I think more and more individuals, if they're being pushed to do something that is either illegal, unethical, unprincipled, or inconsistent with what their responsibilities are, they need to say, no, I'm not going to do that and either be fired or resign. I am hoping, though, that we're still going to have people in the national security community, in law enforcement, who are going to carry out their responsibilities. Because this country really depends on the professionals for them to do their work. This country faces so many challenges, both domestically and internationally. And so what we can't do is be distracted by all these politically motivated prosecutions. And again, I'm hoping that my former colleagues who remain inside of the government are going to continue to carry out their duties in full faith that the American people have in them. Interviewer: I think it's worth also putting a pin in the James Comey statement, which is, he also said, fear is a tool of the tyrant. Brennan: Absolutely. That's what Donald Trump's trying to do. He's trying to stop all people from talking and coerce them into it. I'm not going to be silent.

Brennan's thoughts on his upcoming indictment Brennan "I don't know, I guess it's up to President Trump to say why [he hates me], but clearly my engagement with the CIA during the 2016 period, where we uncovered Russian attempts to interfere in the presidential election, where we determined that Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, was trying to interfere to hurt Hillary Clinton and to help Donald Trump, is something that Donald Trump still does not come to terms with and continues to believe that we try to undermine his election and his presidency, which is so far from the truth. When I was director of CIA, we tried to do our best to stop the Russians, any country, from interfering in the foundation of our democracy, which is our presidential elections. And so Donald Trump has had this gripe against me for the past 8 plus years. And again, what we're seeing right now in terms of the indictment of Jim Comey, clearly this was politically motivated. There have been the career prosecutors that resigned rather than bring charges because there was a lack of evidence, I think strongly suggests that this is something that is part of Donald Trump's revenge tour. And unfortunately, he cannot get over the past. He is somebody who has retribution, I think, in his heart and wants to hurt people, whether it be hurt them reputationally, professionally, financially, or whatever, or legally. And unfortunately, tragically, the Department of Justice now has become putty in his hands. And I think all Americans should be outraged. And I'm waiting for the Republicans, especially Republicans in Congress, to be outraged over what has happened to the Department of Justice. Question: Have you talked to any of them, the Republicans in Congress, about this? Brennan: Not recently, no. They don't call me anymore. Interviewer: I'm curious, especially because you are dealing with this personally. It feels to me that the conviction is not the point. That at the end of the day, whether or not Comey actually gets convicted by a judge at the end of this year is not the point. That it is the selling of the reputation. It is making you guys get lawyers and deal with this, making your family concerned and scared. The chilling effect that it creates to all the people who have something to say about Donald Trump and this country, whether they have power and access to resources or not. Am I right? Is the conviction the point, or is it something else? BRENNAN: Well, I think some of Trump's allies have publicly said, if we cannot charge them with something, we're going to publicly shame them. And so clearly, I think what they're trying to do is to publicly try to embarrass, defame, and disparage individuals who have given their lives in service to this country. Jim Comey, I worked very closely with him when he was director of FBI and CIA. He was trying to carry out his responsibilities to fulfill his oath of office. And I disagree with Jim on a number of issues, but I never doubted his integrity. I never doubted that he was really trying to do everything possible to continue to protect this country from foreign interference in terms of the 2016 election. So, yes, I do believe that what Trump is doing when he talks in such disparaging and profane terms about individuals. Interviewer: And he even said in a recent Charlie Kirk memorial service that he hates his opponents. For the President of the United States to say this. Is it just about disparaging individuals, though? You're the former director of the CIA. Jim Comey is the former director of the FBI. What does this do to Americans' trust in those institutions, in the FBI and the CIA and the Justice Department? Brennan; Well, I think certainly it has undermined confidence in the U.S. judicial system or the Department of Justice, first and foremost, because he's using now prosecutions against individuals. But also I think it makes the individuals within the CIA and the FBI really worry about what it is that the President of the United States may be directing them to do. He doesn't follow not just norms and traditions, but also he pushes the boundaries as far as presidential executive authority. And so I really do think in talking to a number of people, either recently retired or still in government, they really are questioning whether or not this is what they signed up for. And whether or not they can fulfill their obligations, their oath of office, in a way that is consistent with their values and the foundational principles, again, of this country. Interviewer: I realize it's a bit unusual to ask you about the potential case being built against you inside the administration. But I do want to ask about Washington Post reporting that came out this week. The Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, revoked security clearances of current and former officials who could be viewed, called as potential witnesses in the case, according to two senior administration officials. Some of these people targeted by Gabbard worked in the Obama administration at the same time as you did and could possibly be called as witnesses in the government's probe. But these potential witnesses have been labeled by the Director of National Intelligence as unreliable and traitorous, which will complicate efforts by prosecutors to build a case against you. What is your reaction? Brennan: It was absolutely appalling that she revoked the security clearances of those 37 individuals, some of whom were still in government. And there was no basis whatsoever to do that. And the story that says that because of her revocation, it really undermines the case against me. You know, I don't see any case against me. I have looked back on all of my actions and decisions. And with John Durham, the special counsel, and others that have looked at what we did, it was certainly consistent with our legal authorities and with the law. So I don't know what they're referring to there. Individuals who used to work in the government, even if their security clearances were revoked, they could be subpoenaed. They could be called to provide testimony in support of whatever allegations they have. I just don't see a case there. Interviewer: People who are in the crosshairs of these kinds of possible investigations and how it changes your entire life and how you and your family can operate. So how are you? Brennan: Well, I'm glad that Jim Comey put out that video statement the other night where he said that they're not going to live on their knees, his family, and others shouldn't as well. I'm not going to be intimidated by the likes of Donald Trump. I have always tried to speak my mind and do what I thought was right. And clearly there is a corruption and a perversion of the justice system right now within the executive branch. And so I don't know what may be coming my way, but I'm not going to do things that are inconsistent with my ethics and my values. And what it is that I believe is important, I think more people have to speak out when they see injustice. When they see a government that is abusing its authority and its power, I think more and more people have to speak out. And I'm waiting for those Republicans in Congress to come to their senses because the damage that's being done to this country and the dangerous times that we're in, I think too many Americans do not appreciate the extent of that. And certainly I think we're in for even choppier waters ahead. Interviewer: Talking about speaking out, you said that you're still talking to people inside of government. Do you think that it's time for people to hand in their resignations as a sign that they think that this government isn't functioning anymore? Brennan: Well, I'm talking mostly to people who have retired and people who are now transitioning out because they have not been able to put up with what this government is involved in right now. I applaud those individuals who will not bow to Donald Trump. So Eric Siebert, the acting U.S. attorney in the eastern district of Virginia, who resigned rather than bringing charges that he thought were hollow against Jim Comey. I think more and more individuals, if they're being pushed to do something that is either illegal, unethical, unprincipled, or inconsistent with what their responsibilities are, they need to say, no, I'm not going to do that and either be fired or resign. I am hoping, though, that we're still going to have people in the national security community, in law enforcement, who are going to carry out their responsibilities. Because this country really depends on the professionals for them to do their work. This country faces so many challenges, both domestically and internationally. And so what we can't do is be distracted by all these politically motivated prosecutions. And again, I'm hoping that my former colleagues who remain inside of the government are going to continue to carry out their duties in full faith that the American people have in them. Interviewer: I think it's worth also putting a pin in the James Comey statement, which is, he also said, fear is a tool of the tyrant. Brennan: Absolutely. That's what Donald Trump's trying to do. He's trying to stop all people from talking and coerce them into it. I'm not going to be silent.

Svetlana Lokhova

123,303 次观看 • 9 个月前

I AM JUST AN INTERESTING PERSON…NOT A “PERSON OF INTEREST” 🤣🤣🤣 Over the past few days, SOCIAL MEDIA has been awash with various ALLEGATIONS, counter-allegations, ASSUMPTIONS and conspiracy theories emanating from the recent private visit by H.E. President Ramaphosa to Zimbabwe. What should ordinarily have been CELEBRATED as a BROTHERLY and COMRADELY engagement between two neighbouring HEADS OF STATE has unfortunately been taken OUT OF CONTEXT by certain overzealous OPPOSITION detractors who appear determined to MANUFACTURE controversy where none exists. Surprisingly, in the court of PUBLIC OPINION, some have INFERRED that I am the so-called “person of interest” vaguely referred to in a STATEMENT surrounding the visit. From my understanding of the remarks made by the Presidency spokesperson, no individual was ever IDENTIFIED BY NAME, and I therefore find it necessary, purely in the PUBLIC INTEREST and for purposes of setting the record straight, to briefly clarify a few issues. 1. For the record, I am a well-established and successfull businessman of UNQUESTIONABLE INTEGRITY, and I am not wanted in connection with ANY criminal offence whether in Zimbabwe, South Africa or any other jurisdiction whatsoever. This is a position which the INTERPOL has even confirmed on several occasions. South Africa is practically my SECOND HOME and coincidentally, as I post this, I am in CAPE TOWN, on holiday with my wife , kids and their friends. I have often in the past and even recently travelled OPENLY AND FREELY through normal IMMIGRATION channels without the slightest difficulty. If I were indeed some “person of interest” as social media PROSECUTORS allege, I would have OBVIOUSLY been detained, questioned, indicted or subjected to some form of official process. None of that has happened, because the REALITY is often less exciting than the FICTION many STUPID people on social media desperately wish to create around the surname “CHIVAYO”….which is not only a SUPERIOR but UNIQUE and blessed SURNAME. 2. My limited understanding of VVIP SECURITY PROTOCOLS is that no individual gets into CLOSE PROXIMITY with any sitting Head of State, let alone forms part of a ANY delegation, without EXTENSIVE security vetting, screening and clearance by the relevant STATE SECURITY institutions. It is therefore quite ASTONISHING that some sections of the public, especially failed OPPOSITION members in both Zimbabwe and South Africa, appear to believe that BUSINESSMEN who were present during the visit simply EMERGED from nowhere. If anything, I was DEEPLY HONOURED and PRIVILEGED to have been part of the delegation that welcomed President Ramaphosa. I must however urge the South African Twitter detectives and prosecutors to direct this same energy towards denouncing the prevalent XENOPHOBIA ATTACKS , ARMED ROBBERIES and KIDNAPPINGS. South Africa 🇿🇦 is an amazingly beautiful country but RICH PEOPLE have to move around with 15 heavily armed and special forces trained bodyguards in fear for our lives. 3. I have also noticed an APPARENT CONFUSION and unfortunate conflation between myself and my young brother, Joacham Chivayo. The surname “CHIVAYO” is highly recognisable and whether people LIKE IT OR NOT, naturally attracts PUBLIC CURIOSITY and ATTENTION. Everyone associated with it is somehow linked to BIG BUSINESS, SUCCESS or influence in one form or another. Joacham is my little brother, whom I LOVE and hold with the highest RESPECT, and I say this publicly and without any fear of contradiction. However, I cannot meaningfully COMMENT on matters relating to his PRIVATE AFFAIRS or any allegations that may have circulated online regarding his business dealings in South Africa. If there are legal processes involving him anywhere, those matters are PERSONAL to him and have ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with me, just as my own PERSONAL AFFAIRS have nothing to do with him. In any event, any accused person is presumed INNOCENT until proven guilty. TO BE CONTINUED...

I AM JUST AN INTERESTING PERSON…NOT A “PERSON OF INTEREST” 🤣🤣🤣 Over the past few days, SOCIAL MEDIA has been awash with various ALLEGATIONS, counter-allegations, ASSUMPTIONS and conspiracy theories emanating from the recent private visit by H.E. President Ramaphosa to Zimbabwe. What should ordinarily have been CELEBRATED as a BROTHERLY and COMRADELY engagement between two neighbouring HEADS OF STATE has unfortunately been taken OUT OF CONTEXT by certain overzealous OPPOSITION detractors who appear determined to MANUFACTURE controversy where none exists. Surprisingly, in the court of PUBLIC OPINION, some have INFERRED that I am the so-called “person of interest” vaguely referred to in a STATEMENT surrounding the visit. From my understanding of the remarks made by the Presidency spokesperson, no individual was ever IDENTIFIED BY NAME, and I therefore find it necessary, purely in the PUBLIC INTEREST and for purposes of setting the record straight, to briefly clarify a few issues. 1. For the record, I am a well-established and successfull businessman of UNQUESTIONABLE INTEGRITY, and I am not wanted in connection with ANY criminal offence whether in Zimbabwe, South Africa or any other jurisdiction whatsoever. This is a position which the INTERPOL has even confirmed on several occasions. South Africa is practically my SECOND HOME and coincidentally, as I post this, I am in CAPE TOWN, on holiday with my wife , kids and their friends. I have often in the past and even recently travelled OPENLY AND FREELY through normal IMMIGRATION channels without the slightest difficulty. If I were indeed some “person of interest” as social media PROSECUTORS allege, I would have OBVIOUSLY been detained, questioned, indicted or subjected to some form of official process. None of that has happened, because the REALITY is often less exciting than the FICTION many STUPID people on social media desperately wish to create around the surname “CHIVAYO”….which is not only a SUPERIOR but UNIQUE and blessed SURNAME. 2. My limited understanding of VVIP SECURITY PROTOCOLS is that no individual gets into CLOSE PROXIMITY with any sitting Head of State, let alone forms part of a ANY delegation, without EXTENSIVE security vetting, screening and clearance by the relevant STATE SECURITY institutions. It is therefore quite ASTONISHING that some sections of the public, especially failed OPPOSITION members in both Zimbabwe and South Africa, appear to believe that BUSINESSMEN who were present during the visit simply EMERGED from nowhere. If anything, I was DEEPLY HONOURED and PRIVILEGED to have been part of the delegation that welcomed President Ramaphosa. I must however urge the South African Twitter detectives and prosecutors to direct this same energy towards denouncing the prevalent XENOPHOBIA ATTACKS , ARMED ROBBERIES and KIDNAPPINGS. South Africa 🇿🇦 is an amazingly beautiful country but RICH PEOPLE have to move around with 15 heavily armed and special forces trained bodyguards in fear for our lives. 3. I have also noticed an APPARENT CONFUSION and unfortunate conflation between myself and my young brother, Joacham Chivayo. The surname “CHIVAYO” is highly recognisable and whether people LIKE IT OR NOT, naturally attracts PUBLIC CURIOSITY and ATTENTION. Everyone associated with it is somehow linked to BIG BUSINESS, SUCCESS or influence in one form or another. Joacham is my little brother, whom I LOVE and hold with the highest RESPECT, and I say this publicly and without any fear of contradiction. However, I cannot meaningfully COMMENT on matters relating to his PRIVATE AFFAIRS or any allegations that may have circulated online regarding his business dealings in South Africa. If there are legal processes involving him anywhere, those matters are PERSONAL to him and have ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with me, just as my own PERSONAL AFFAIRS have nothing to do with him. In any event, any accused person is presumed INNOCENT until proven guilty. TO BE CONTINUED...

sir_wicknell.

122,057 次观看 • 2 个月前

Reporter: What do you think of Sid Rosenberg using the term cockroach? Mamdani: So Muslims in this city, for almost as long as we have been in this city, have had to deal with those with power and platform dehumanizing us — to be called animals, insects, to be called a jihadist mayor…. This language is both painfully familiar to me as a Muslim New Yorker, but also as someone who was born in East Africa, and it is difficult to hear. There’s also a reminder that the silence that often greets this kind of bigotry, this kind of Islamophobia, is what allows it to fester — the temptation to treat it as politics as usual. And I want to be very clear that I have far more urgent work in front of me than indulging the provocations of a man who trades in outrage and, frankly, fears the city that we are looking to build — one where every single New Yorker who lives here can call it their home. I am not ashamed of who I am. I am not ashamed of my faith. I am not ashamed of being the first Muslim mayor in the history of our city. And there’s no amount of racism that will change the way in which I lead or the commitment that I hold to each and every New Yorker in this city.

Reporter: What do you think of Sid Rosenberg using the term cockroach? Mamdani: So Muslims in this city, for almost as long as we have been in this city, have had to deal with those with power and platform dehumanizing us — to be called animals, insects, to be called a jihadist mayor…. This language is both painfully familiar to me as a Muslim New Yorker, but also as someone who was born in East Africa, and it is difficult to hear. There’s also a reminder that the silence that often greets this kind of bigotry, this kind of Islamophobia, is what allows it to fester — the temptation to treat it as politics as usual. And I want to be very clear that I have far more urgent work in front of me than indulging the provocations of a man who trades in outrage and, frankly, fears the city that we are looking to build — one where every single New Yorker who lives here can call it their home. I am not ashamed of who I am. I am not ashamed of my faith. I am not ashamed of being the first Muslim mayor in the history of our city. And there’s no amount of racism that will change the way in which I lead or the commitment that I hold to each and every New Yorker in this city.

Acyn

972,731 次观看 • 4 个月前

PRESS STATEMENT In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight. When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies. I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me. Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me. I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day. As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know. The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki” I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative. I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far. Stay tuned. – D.H Bwala Special Adviser to President on Media and Policy Communication (State House) Saturday March 7, 2026

PRESS STATEMENT In the last 24 hours, social media has exploded over my interview with Mehdi Hassan, albeit with varied opinions. Let me set the record straight. When I signed on to the privileged job granted to me by Mr. President, I was well aware of its implications. Selling ice cream, looking fine, and seeking the praises of men were never part of it. Some of the fiercest critics of my interview can not even stand local TV anchors. But the task of promoting and defending the President and his administration is what I do with ease and joy. I am prepared to appear before any interviewer, anywhere in the world, any day and at any time, to defend this government and its policies. I have never, and will never, subscribe to ducking or dodging interviews on matters that concern promoting and defending the administration I was appointed to serve. It is the least of what is required of me. Head to Head contacted me requesting an interview, stating that they wanted to challenge our government on security, the economy, and corruption. Nowhere in our almost six months of communication did they mention that they were going to challenge my past. If that had been their plan, ethically and professionally, they were supposed to inform me so I could prepare my response. But that’s okay, ethically, that is on them, not on me. I refused to swallow the pill of Mehdi’s “opposition research-style journalism,” and even today, if you carefully compare what he read as quotes from organisations and groups, you will see that many were inaccurate and some were outright fake news. But I will leave that for another day. As for what I said about President Tinubu in the past, I am glad those were things I said when I was in the opposition saddle with such zeal. It is all politics. Half of Donald Trump’s cabinet is made up of people who once spoke against him, and quite a number of people in our own cabinet also spoke against President Tinubu in the past. Those things do not bother him if you care to know. The majority of the naysayers are members of the opposition and their sympathisers. It does not bother me one bit. Their temporary excitement over the interview has not lasted and will not last, because it does not take away their obvious problem of lack of vision, mission in conducting and managing a political party; yet they seek to manage Nigeria. Clearly they have no path to victory and no alternative policies or program for the Nigerian people. And if they say they do, they can as well go to head to head and be interrogated on that; as the saying in Hausa goes “Ga fili Ga doki” I conclude by thanking the many Nigerians and non-Nigerians who sent in their commendations over my brave defence of our government in an interview where the anchor would hardly let you answer a question unless it suited his narrative. I still have admiration and respect for Mehdi Hassan as arguably the best debater on the planet. I look forward to part two of the Head to Head interview, and I am glad that by then questions about my past will no longer be news so that we can focus on our administration’s policies, programs and what we have achieved so far. Stay tuned. – D.H Bwala Special Adviser to President on Media and Policy Communication (State House) Saturday March 7, 2026

D. H Bwala

1,483,196 次观看 • 4 个月前

CBS Democrat activist Margaret Brennan conducted an interview with a USAID employee whose identity is concealed. While legacy media is actively investigating and doxxing DOGE employees, they respect the USAID employee’s wish not to be publicly named. In this three-minute excerpt (edits are marked with white flashes), the employee claims: - An atmosphere of “massive insecurity" - A fear of being doxxed - Their personal data is compromised - DOGE actions have not been approved by President Trump and are the actions of a “few rogue individuals" - DOGE actions are dangerous and illegal - DOGE actions are not serving President Trump’s mandate - Elon is unilaterally making decisions that take help away from the poorest people in the world Many of these claims are clearly untrue on their face, yet no pushback from Brennan was offered. Legacy media is working to undermine DOGE efforts to cut government waste and expose fraud, because legacy media is part of the waste and fraud. The full transcript of this excerpt is provided below, and the full interview is linked in threaded post. --- BRENNAN: Why in our conversation do you think you need to remain anonymous? EMPLOYEE: It has been a very hard, a very hard week. Personally. Professionally, as I said, I live in Washington, D.C. Many of my colleagues work in this field. Starting from January 21st, so the first day of the new administration, things started to go sideways very quickly. The atmosphere of fear that was in the USAID building, which we're no longer in, the atmosphere of fear, in terms of not knowing who was in the building, not knowing what their motivations were, not knowing if our emails or channels were safe, not knowing how to interpret these executive orders right around DEIA or administration priorities. EMPLOYEE: All of that created an atmosphere of massive insecurity. And so people have, I think, lost the ability to know what's true for what's not. At this point, everyone is really scared. EMPLOYEE: And so, you know, I have a daughter, I have a family, like most Americans. And I want to be brave. I think it's really important to share our personal stories at this time, but I am afraid, and I just don't want to put them at any more risk than we have to. BRENNAN: When you say doxxed, there is fear of public sharing of your name and possibly targeting? EMPLOYEE: Absolutely. BRENNAN: By who? EMPLOYEE: Well, I mean, at this point, those members, including Elon Musk, have access to not just the data within the USAID world. Right. And the USAID system, which includes my personal email address, my Social Security number, my entire security file in that security file is every contact I've ever known, every country I've traveled to, every home address I've had. EMPLOYEE: So no matter which way I look at it, my information is entirely compromised and it's in hands that I don't know and don't trust. EMPLOYEE: And yes, the government can be slow. It can be inefficient. It can cost taxpayers money. I do not doubt that at all. What is absolutely clear to me is that methods being used to achieve this so-called efficiency, not only do they not seem to be vetted and approved by the president of the United States or our Secretary, Marco Rubio. EMPLOYEE: They are entirely the actions of a rogue few individuals. They're dangerous. They're illegal. They're cruel more than anything. And so, no, I don't think this is serving American interests or answering to the president's mandates. EMPLOYEE: And so to have this sort of, to be vilified by a billionaire who has decided that he's unilaterally going to take help away from the poorest people in the world, and he's doing it on behalf of the American people is particularly gross and horrifying. And I am angry. I am sad, I am devastated for my colleagues, for myself, for my family, and for the American people.

CBS Democrat activist Margaret Brennan conducted an interview with a USAID employee whose identity is concealed. While legacy media is actively investigating and doxxing DOGE employees, they respect the USAID employee’s wish not to be publicly named. In this three-minute excerpt (edits are marked with white flashes), the employee claims: - An atmosphere of “massive insecurity" - A fear of being doxxed - Their personal data is compromised - DOGE actions have not been approved by President Trump and are the actions of a “few rogue individuals" - DOGE actions are dangerous and illegal - DOGE actions are not serving President Trump’s mandate - Elon is unilaterally making decisions that take help away from the poorest people in the world Many of these claims are clearly untrue on their face, yet no pushback from Brennan was offered. Legacy media is working to undermine DOGE efforts to cut government waste and expose fraud, because legacy media is part of the waste and fraud. The full transcript of this excerpt is provided below, and the full interview is linked in threaded post. --- BRENNAN: Why in our conversation do you think you need to remain anonymous? EMPLOYEE: It has been a very hard, a very hard week. Personally. Professionally, as I said, I live in Washington, D.C. Many of my colleagues work in this field. Starting from January 21st, so the first day of the new administration, things started to go sideways very quickly. The atmosphere of fear that was in the USAID building, which we're no longer in, the atmosphere of fear, in terms of not knowing who was in the building, not knowing what their motivations were, not knowing if our emails or channels were safe, not knowing how to interpret these executive orders right around DEIA or administration priorities. EMPLOYEE: All of that created an atmosphere of massive insecurity. And so people have, I think, lost the ability to know what's true for what's not. At this point, everyone is really scared. EMPLOYEE: And so, you know, I have a daughter, I have a family, like most Americans. And I want to be brave. I think it's really important to share our personal stories at this time, but I am afraid, and I just don't want to put them at any more risk than we have to. BRENNAN: When you say doxxed, there is fear of public sharing of your name and possibly targeting? EMPLOYEE: Absolutely. BRENNAN: By who? EMPLOYEE: Well, I mean, at this point, those members, including Elon Musk, have access to not just the data within the USAID world. Right. And the USAID system, which includes my personal email address, my Social Security number, my entire security file in that security file is every contact I've ever known, every country I've traveled to, every home address I've had. EMPLOYEE: So no matter which way I look at it, my information is entirely compromised and it's in hands that I don't know and don't trust. EMPLOYEE: And yes, the government can be slow. It can be inefficient. It can cost taxpayers money. I do not doubt that at all. What is absolutely clear to me is that methods being used to achieve this so-called efficiency, not only do they not seem to be vetted and approved by the president of the United States or our Secretary, Marco Rubio. EMPLOYEE: They are entirely the actions of a rogue few individuals. They're dangerous. They're illegal. They're cruel more than anything. And so, no, I don't think this is serving American interests or answering to the president's mandates. EMPLOYEE: And so to have this sort of, to be vilified by a billionaire who has decided that he's unilaterally going to take help away from the poorest people in the world, and he's doing it on behalf of the American people is particularly gross and horrifying. And I am angry. I am sad, I am devastated for my colleagues, for myself, for my family, and for the American people.

Western Lensman

1,909,762 次观看 • 1 年前

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”

WATCH: CNN’s John Miller mentions the video and notes left behind by the alleged Minneapolis Catholic church shooter, citing their mental illness and the working motive is “he was in pain,” but NOTHING about the shooter being transgender and that they hated Christians, Jews, and Trump... Well, we’ve been looking into the shooter who law enforcement sources have identified as Robin Westman and police have been examining some of the postings online by an individual of the same name, presumed to be the same individual. It shows numerous weapons, magazines, things in preparation for the shooting along with a book and different notes. But one of them is particularly telling in that it says: ‘I have waited for this for so long. I am not well. I am not right. I am a sad person, haunted by these thoughts that do not go away. I know this is wrong’ and he goes on to describe that the action he is going to take against this world before taking his own life — which is not uncommon in these incidents, these active shooter scenarios where you see someone who reports to be in — in — in pain and trauma and that they write all of this out and leave it behind with the foreknowledge that what they're about to do is going to end their own life as well, while taking these — these strangers, these innocent people with them in the process. But investigators are going back through this material and a lot of other material trying to determine motive. So what do we know? I mean, what we know, if this in fact is from the shooter, that his motive was he was in pain. But what we don't see here and there's more to go through is what was, what was the shooter — Robin Westman in pain about specifically?”

Curtis Houck

64,113 次观看 • 10 个月前

1/2. Greetings, fellow Zimbabweans. This is your comrade, Blessed Runesu Geza, Cde Bombshell. As we approach the end of 2025, I extend my warmest greetings to all progressive Zimbabweans, both at home and abroad. I trust you will agree that 2025 was a year many would want to quickly forget. Zimbabwe’s economy continued on the precipice and life has not been easy for ordinary Zimbabweans. It has been a year marked by truth-telling, resistance, sacrifice, and awakening. Many masks have fallen, lies have been exposed, and countless Zimbabweans have awoken to the realities at stake in our beloved country. Throughout this year, I have consistently spoken out about Emmerson’s corruption, which has birthed a deep moral crisis within ZANU PF. I have made it abundantly clear: Emmerson must go, and he will, regardless of the obstacles in our path. I have made this call not out of bitterness or ambition, but out of a profound sense of duty. To remain silent would be to betray the liberation struggle and the people of Zimbabwe. I speak out because corruption has become institutionalised and there is empathy for the poor. Looters are now parading as leaders, and these thieves lecture the impoverished about the need to be patient with Emmerson and even give him more years to 2030. This will be a pipe dream. I assure you that the 2030 project will die in pregnancy. I warned that the party of liberation was being hijacked by Zvigananda, individuals whose only ideology is stolen wealth, whose only loyalty is to themselves, and whose sole interest in power is control over state resources. They are not revolutionaries; they never fought for this country, nor did they sacrifice anything meaningful. They have simply arrived at the banquet, feasting without shame, while those who gave everything for our freedom are left in poverty. I have also adamantly opposed the so-called 2030 Project and the dangerous bid for a third term for Emmerson. It must be unequivocally recorded that this agenda is not centred on national stability - it is merely a tactic to buy time, shield corruption, evade accountability, and safeguard ill-gotten gains. They understand that they cannot endure under constitutional governance and the rule of law. Zimbabweans must grapple with this painful truth: every attempt to amend, reinterpret, or stretch the Constitution for personal gain weakens our nation. POWER THAT FEARS THE END OF DAYS IS POWER THAT HAS FAILED. Thankfully, the 2030 Project has not progressed as its architects intended. Ziyambi Ziyambi said the process will be rolled out before the festive season. Where is it? Resistance has emerged, both from within and outside ZANU PF. War veterans, who remember the reasons behind our struggle, have firmly rejected the blatant violations of our Constitution. Citizens, too, have said “No.” For speaking this truth, I have paid a personal price. I was forced into hiding, not because I committed any crime, but because I refused to speak lies. But Mwari nevadzimu venyika ino vari kundichengeta. Our history is replete with men and women driven into secrecy to silence the truth. In this case, however, the truth has only grown louder. As we speak, war veterans and many citizens were arrested for wanting to exercise their constitutional rights on 17 October. I assure them arrested that their pain will not be in vain. As for me, my resolve has not weakened during this time; quite the opposite. Being forced into hiding has reignited my desire to ensure that Zimbabwe is run by people who respect the liberation values, not the rubbish we have today. Fallen heroes did not die for Emmerson and his crooks to live on the sweat of Zimbabweans. I remain connected to the heartbeat of Zimbabwe. I hear the cries of workers, vendors, farmers, youths, pensioners, and civil servants. I hear the frustration of a populace told to tighten their belts while others traverse the skies in private jets

1/2. Greetings, fellow Zimbabweans. This is your comrade, Blessed Runesu Geza, Cde Bombshell. As we approach the end of 2025, I extend my warmest greetings to all progressive Zimbabweans, both at home and abroad. I trust you will agree that 2025 was a year many would want to quickly forget. Zimbabwe’s economy continued on the precipice and life has not been easy for ordinary Zimbabweans. It has been a year marked by truth-telling, resistance, sacrifice, and awakening. Many masks have fallen, lies have been exposed, and countless Zimbabweans have awoken to the realities at stake in our beloved country. Throughout this year, I have consistently spoken out about Emmerson’s corruption, which has birthed a deep moral crisis within ZANU PF. I have made it abundantly clear: Emmerson must go, and he will, regardless of the obstacles in our path. I have made this call not out of bitterness or ambition, but out of a profound sense of duty. To remain silent would be to betray the liberation struggle and the people of Zimbabwe. I speak out because corruption has become institutionalised and there is empathy for the poor. Looters are now parading as leaders, and these thieves lecture the impoverished about the need to be patient with Emmerson and even give him more years to 2030. This will be a pipe dream. I assure you that the 2030 project will die in pregnancy. I warned that the party of liberation was being hijacked by Zvigananda, individuals whose only ideology is stolen wealth, whose only loyalty is to themselves, and whose sole interest in power is control over state resources. They are not revolutionaries; they never fought for this country, nor did they sacrifice anything meaningful. They have simply arrived at the banquet, feasting without shame, while those who gave everything for our freedom are left in poverty. I have also adamantly opposed the so-called 2030 Project and the dangerous bid for a third term for Emmerson. It must be unequivocally recorded that this agenda is not centred on national stability - it is merely a tactic to buy time, shield corruption, evade accountability, and safeguard ill-gotten gains. They understand that they cannot endure under constitutional governance and the rule of law. Zimbabweans must grapple with this painful truth: every attempt to amend, reinterpret, or stretch the Constitution for personal gain weakens our nation. POWER THAT FEARS THE END OF DAYS IS POWER THAT HAS FAILED. Thankfully, the 2030 Project has not progressed as its architects intended. Ziyambi Ziyambi said the process will be rolled out before the festive season. Where is it? Resistance has emerged, both from within and outside ZANU PF. War veterans, who remember the reasons behind our struggle, have firmly rejected the blatant violations of our Constitution. Citizens, too, have said “No.” For speaking this truth, I have paid a personal price. I was forced into hiding, not because I committed any crime, but because I refused to speak lies. But Mwari nevadzimu venyika ino vari kundichengeta. Our history is replete with men and women driven into secrecy to silence the truth. In this case, however, the truth has only grown louder. As we speak, war veterans and many citizens were arrested for wanting to exercise their constitutional rights on 17 October. I assure them arrested that their pain will not be in vain. As for me, my resolve has not weakened during this time; quite the opposite. Being forced into hiding has reignited my desire to ensure that Zimbabwe is run by people who respect the liberation values, not the rubbish we have today. Fallen heroes did not die for Emmerson and his crooks to live on the sweat of Zimbabweans. I remain connected to the heartbeat of Zimbabwe. I hear the cries of workers, vendors, farmers, youths, pensioners, and civil servants. I hear the frustration of a populace told to tighten their belts while others traverse the skies in private jets

Geza Revolution

160,772 次观看 • 6 个月前

Being boldly outspoken online holds risks. Exposure holds risks. This is why so many fear taking up space or using their voices on the internet. People will pick your words apart, project their own beliefs, fears, insecurities and perceptions on you, make assumptions and even get off on the drama. I have been exposed in the online space since 2018. And through the years, I have been more and more outspoken about my philosophy around FemDom and BDSM, unapologetically. My practice as a Mistress was always sacred to me. And as a Mentor, I hold myself on the same standard and understand the responsibility I hold to lead women on their Mistress Journey, I do not take this lightly. It is also sacred to me. I first entered the SW industry in 2011 from a very disempowered place and experienced heavy trauma. I barely got out of what I got myself into (if you know my story you know). And when I reentered the industry in 2017, I knew my boundaries, that I would work for myself, and that becoming a Professional Dominatrix was a calling. In 5 years, I built something extraordinary. I made a shit ton of money, yes, but I also had real, genuine and long lasting D/s relationships, with subs I respected and who respected me. Not just who admired me, but actually cared about me, as I cared about them. I had my own Dungeon, that was one of the best in Montreal, and I had an online practice that I developed during COVID that helped my business explode. When I got pregnant and decided to leave the industry as a ProDomme, I dedicated my heart and soul to build the most powerful courses for Dommes. It started with The Dominatrix Academy, and then building a Membership and Sisterhood for Dommes to connect from all over the world. I show up there every single day and create classes and programs based on what they are moving through and need to improve their practice, make more money and from a way that feels aligned with them, not at the expense of their integrity, and to build something that can sustain them in the long haul. Up to this day I get messages from my clients/subs from many years ago. Thanking me for our time together. And now I consistently receive gratitude messages and even gifts from the women who work with me. I am very proud of what I built and most importantly, how I built it. It holds my heart beat. Yes, there will always be people who don't resonate, or who don't like me or what I teach or how I do things. But we are all adults, and we should therefore address concerns like adults. In a mature, ethical, loving way. Not with hate threads. I am extremely disheartened that the controversy I am facing is coming from peers and women I respected. Not from some online troll or someone outside the industry judging SWers. That I was prepared to debate with, to defend my community. Yet, the women who are questioning me publicly and writing about me as if they know what they are talking about, have never met me, spoken to me, been in any of my containers. It's just based on assumptions, wrong interpretation of my words, triggers and prejudice. It is because of women like this that there is such a sister wound in this industry. And one of the most beautiful feedbacks I get from the women in my world, is how healing it is to be in a genuine sisterhood, with no cattiness. I stand by what I said and how I meant it. And if it did not land for you, that's okay, it was just not meant for you. Enough time and energy has been leaked on this. I am just going to share a video of the Graduation of The Dominatrix Academy. THIS is what I do. And this is not just words... you get to actually watch what I create with the women who work with me. Thank you for reading.

Being boldly outspoken online holds risks. Exposure holds risks. This is why so many fear taking up space or using their voices on the internet. People will pick your words apart, project their own beliefs, fears, insecurities and perceptions on you, make assumptions and even get off on the drama. I have been exposed in the online space since 2018. And through the years, I have been more and more outspoken about my philosophy around FemDom and BDSM, unapologetically. My practice as a Mistress was always sacred to me. And as a Mentor, I hold myself on the same standard and understand the responsibility I hold to lead women on their Mistress Journey, I do not take this lightly. It is also sacred to me. I first entered the SW industry in 2011 from a very disempowered place and experienced heavy trauma. I barely got out of what I got myself into (if you know my story you know). And when I reentered the industry in 2017, I knew my boundaries, that I would work for myself, and that becoming a Professional Dominatrix was a calling. In 5 years, I built something extraordinary. I made a shit ton of money, yes, but I also had real, genuine and long lasting D/s relationships, with subs I respected and who respected me. Not just who admired me, but actually cared about me, as I cared about them. I had my own Dungeon, that was one of the best in Montreal, and I had an online practice that I developed during COVID that helped my business explode. When I got pregnant and decided to leave the industry as a ProDomme, I dedicated my heart and soul to build the most powerful courses for Dommes. It started with The Dominatrix Academy, and then building a Membership and Sisterhood for Dommes to connect from all over the world. I show up there every single day and create classes and programs based on what they are moving through and need to improve their practice, make more money and from a way that feels aligned with them, not at the expense of their integrity, and to build something that can sustain them in the long haul. Up to this day I get messages from my clients/subs from many years ago. Thanking me for our time together. And now I consistently receive gratitude messages and even gifts from the women who work with me. I am very proud of what I built and most importantly, how I built it. It holds my heart beat. Yes, there will always be people who don't resonate, or who don't like me or what I teach or how I do things. But we are all adults, and we should therefore address concerns like adults. In a mature, ethical, loving way. Not with hate threads. I am extremely disheartened that the controversy I am facing is coming from peers and women I respected. Not from some online troll or someone outside the industry judging SWers. That I was prepared to debate with, to defend my community. Yet, the women who are questioning me publicly and writing about me as if they know what they are talking about, have never met me, spoken to me, been in any of my containers. It's just based on assumptions, wrong interpretation of my words, triggers and prejudice. It is because of women like this that there is such a sister wound in this industry. And one of the most beautiful feedbacks I get from the women in my world, is how healing it is to be in a genuine sisterhood, with no cattiness. I stand by what I said and how I meant it. And if it did not land for you, that's okay, it was just not meant for you. Enough time and energy has been leaked on this. I am just going to share a video of the Graduation of The Dominatrix Academy. THIS is what I do. And this is not just words... you get to actually watch what I create with the women who work with me. Thank you for reading.

Ms. Malissia

19,995 次观看 • 8 个月前

Swansea Council and South Wales Police have now reached their conclusions regarding the incident involving my special needs stepdaughter. According to their findings, the way my daughter was handled was considered acceptable and did not warrant further action. I have attached the response from the investigating officers, and I encourage everyone to read it for themselves. I also want to address some of the comments from people saying what they would have done if this had happened to their child. The truth is that when I witnessed my daughter being dragged, I was absolutely furious. As a parent, seeing your vulnerable child handled in a way that you believe is wrong creates emotions that are difficult to put into words. However, I made the decision to remove my daughter from the situation and exercise restraint. I have learned that, regardless of how strongly I feel, I must be careful and measured in how I respond. That is why I reported the matter through the proper channels and allowed the authorities to investigate. What frustrates me is not simply the outcome, but what I see as a failure to properly recognise the impact this incident has had on my daughter. Since that day, she has been distressed, upset, and emotionally affected by what happened. For transparency, I am sharing the video of the incident, the response from the investigating officer, and a separate interaction I had with a South Wales Police officer. I am not asking anyone to take my word for it. Watch the footage, read the response, and make up your own mind. Many people will disagree with me. Some will say the authorities got it right. Others will say they got it wrong. That is for the public to decide. My concern has always been the same, the welfare and protection of vulnerable children. Every child deserves to be treated with dignity, respect, and care. I am not claiming to speak on behalf of anyone else. I am speaking as a husband, a stepfather, and someone who believes that parents have a duty to stand up for their children when they believe something is wrong. I am now receiving unannounced visits to my daughter's services and have been warned about publishing the video. This has only increased my concerns about how this matter is being handled. If there are any solicitors, legal professionals, or organisations experienced in safeguarding, disability rights, or family law who are willing to offer guidance, I would appreciate hearing from you via direct message. My goal is not conflict. My goal is accountability, transparency, and ensuring that vulnerable children and adults receive the protection, respect, and care they deserve. Whether you agree with me or not, I welcome your honest opinions. Watch the evidence, read the responses, and decide for yourself.

Swansea Council and South Wales Police have now reached their conclusions regarding the incident involving my special needs stepdaughter. According to their findings, the way my daughter was handled was considered acceptable and did not warrant further action. I have attached the response from the investigating officers, and I encourage everyone to read it for themselves. I also want to address some of the comments from people saying what they would have done if this had happened to their child. The truth is that when I witnessed my daughter being dragged, I was absolutely furious. As a parent, seeing your vulnerable child handled in a way that you believe is wrong creates emotions that are difficult to put into words. However, I made the decision to remove my daughter from the situation and exercise restraint. I have learned that, regardless of how strongly I feel, I must be careful and measured in how I respond. That is why I reported the matter through the proper channels and allowed the authorities to investigate. What frustrates me is not simply the outcome, but what I see as a failure to properly recognise the impact this incident has had on my daughter. Since that day, she has been distressed, upset, and emotionally affected by what happened. For transparency, I am sharing the video of the incident, the response from the investigating officer, and a separate interaction I had with a South Wales Police officer. I am not asking anyone to take my word for it. Watch the footage, read the response, and make up your own mind. Many people will disagree with me. Some will say the authorities got it right. Others will say they got it wrong. That is for the public to decide. My concern has always been the same, the welfare and protection of vulnerable children. Every child deserves to be treated with dignity, respect, and care. I am not claiming to speak on behalf of anyone else. I am speaking as a husband, a stepfather, and someone who believes that parents have a duty to stand up for their children when they believe something is wrong. I am now receiving unannounced visits to my daughter's services and have been warned about publishing the video. This has only increased my concerns about how this matter is being handled. If there are any solicitors, legal professionals, or organisations experienced in safeguarding, disability rights, or family law who are willing to offer guidance, I would appreciate hearing from you via direct message. My goal is not conflict. My goal is accountability, transparency, and ensuring that vulnerable children and adults receive the protection, respect, and care they deserve. Whether you agree with me or not, I welcome your honest opinions. Watch the evidence, read the responses, and decide for yourself.

Sir Shoaib

13,322 次观看 • 1 个月前

Zohran Mamdani: Muslims in this city, for almost as long as we have been in this city, have had to deal with those with power and platform dehumanizing us. And to be called animals, insects, to be called a jihadist mayor, to be called a cockroach, this language is both painfully familiar to me as a Muslim New Yorker, but also as someone who was born in East Africa. And it is difficult to hear. It is also a reminder that the silence that often greets this kind of bigotry, this kind of Islamophobia, is what allows it to fester, the temptation to treat it as politics as usual. I am not ashamed of who I am. I am not ashamed of my faith. I am not ashamed of being the first Muslim mayor in the history of our city. And there is no amount of racism that will change the way in which I lead or the commitment that I hold to each and every New Yorker in this city.

Zohran Mamdani: Muslims in this city, for almost as long as we have been in this city, have had to deal with those with power and platform dehumanizing us. And to be called animals, insects, to be called a jihadist mayor, to be called a cockroach, this language is both painfully familiar to me as a Muslim New Yorker, but also as someone who was born in East Africa. And it is difficult to hear. It is also a reminder that the silence that often greets this kind of bigotry, this kind of Islamophobia, is what allows it to fester, the temptation to treat it as politics as usual. I am not ashamed of who I am. I am not ashamed of my faith. I am not ashamed of being the first Muslim mayor in the history of our city. And there is no amount of racism that will change the way in which I lead or the commitment that I hold to each and every New Yorker in this city.

Open Source Intel

76,403 次观看 • 4 个月前

Zohran Mamdani: Muslims in this city, for almost as long as we have been in this city, have had to deal with those with power and platform dehumanizing us. And to be called animals, insects, to be called a jihadist mayor, to be called a cockroach—this language is both painfully familiar to me as a Muslim New Yorker, but also as someone who was born in East Africa. And it is difficult to hear. It is also a reminder that the silence that often greets this kind of bigotry, this kind of Islamophobia, is what allows it to fester—the temptation to treat it as politics as usual. I am not ashamed of who I am. I am not ashamed of my faith. I am not ashamed of being the first Muslim mayor in the history of our city. And there is no amount of racism that will change the way in which I lead or the commitment that I hold to each and every New Yorker in this city.

Zohran Mamdani: Muslims in this city, for almost as long as we have been in this city, have had to deal with those with power and platform dehumanizing us. And to be called animals, insects, to be called a jihadist mayor, to be called a cockroach—this language is both painfully familiar to me as a Muslim New Yorker, but also as someone who was born in East Africa. And it is difficult to hear. It is also a reminder that the silence that often greets this kind of bigotry, this kind of Islamophobia, is what allows it to fester—the temptation to treat it as politics as usual. I am not ashamed of who I am. I am not ashamed of my faith. I am not ashamed of being the first Muslim mayor in the history of our city. And there is no amount of racism that will change the way in which I lead or the commitment that I hold to each and every New Yorker in this city.

Clash Report

34,573 次观看 • 4 个月前

I wanted to weigh in on this recent trend of people running into Scientology buildings, causing chaos, and posting the videos on social media. Whether these people are doing it for social media clout or to genuinely expose the abuses of Scientology, what they are doing is unhelpful, and by engaging in these actions, they are unwittingly helping Scientology. I want as many people as possible talking about the dangers and criminality of Scientology. But I spent decades on the other side of this, and if I had been confronted by people running through Scientology buildings and harassing me or staff, it would have pushed me further into Scientology. That is because Scientologists are deeply indoctrinated and radicalized and believe they are helping people. They have been brainwashed over many years into believing the outside world is filled with chaos and criminality, and that their mission, one they believe they are on through countless lifetimes, is to help eradicate this chaos. If someone is brainwashed for years into believing the outside world is filled with dangerous lunatics who wish to impede Scientology, a group of people running through a Scientology building is only going to confirm that belief and lead them to dedicate themselves even more to the cause they believe in. Mike Rinder and I discussed this on our podcast Fair Game: Scientologists, in particular Scientology Sea Org members, have a level of dedication and radicalization to Scientology that surpasses that of a jihadist terrorist. Running through a building is not going to break that or lead them to reconsider what they’ve given up their entire lives for. I also want to note that any Scientology building that someone is allowed to easily enter from the street is not a building where someone like David Miscavige or any senior Scientology executive is going to be. People at that level of Scientology’s criminal leadership will be behind gates and many layers of security. Please focus on exposing the dangers of Scientology, not making a spectacle out of it.

I wanted to weigh in on this recent trend of people running into Scientology buildings, causing chaos, and posting the videos on social media. Whether these people are doing it for social media clout or to genuinely expose the abuses of Scientology, what they are doing is unhelpful, and by engaging in these actions, they are unwittingly helping Scientology. I want as many people as possible talking about the dangers and criminality of Scientology. But I spent decades on the other side of this, and if I had been confronted by people running through Scientology buildings and harassing me or staff, it would have pushed me further into Scientology. That is because Scientologists are deeply indoctrinated and radicalized and believe they are helping people. They have been brainwashed over many years into believing the outside world is filled with chaos and criminality, and that their mission, one they believe they are on through countless lifetimes, is to help eradicate this chaos. If someone is brainwashed for years into believing the outside world is filled with dangerous lunatics who wish to impede Scientology, a group of people running through a Scientology building is only going to confirm that belief and lead them to dedicate themselves even more to the cause they believe in. Mike Rinder and I discussed this on our podcast Fair Game: Scientologists, in particular Scientology Sea Org members, have a level of dedication and radicalization to Scientology that surpasses that of a jihadist terrorist. Running through a building is not going to break that or lead them to reconsider what they’ve given up their entire lives for. I also want to note that any Scientology building that someone is allowed to easily enter from the street is not a building where someone like David Miscavige or any senior Scientology executive is going to be. People at that level of Scientology’s criminal leadership will be behind gates and many layers of security. Please focus on exposing the dangers of Scientology, not making a spectacle out of it.

Leah Remini

142,418 次观看 • 2 个月前

A few days ago, at the meeting of the Senate Committee on Local Content, I had cause to recuse myself when I got to know that it was an investigative hearing summoned to investigate allegations of diversion of $14.8m against the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Chief Timipre Sylva. As I explained, I attended believing it was an interactive forum with the Executive Secretary and his team. When I discovered that the hearing was specifically summoned for that purpose, I raised objections—firstly, on the ground that there should be no selective inquiry; that the entirety of the management of the fund, perhaps from inception, should be investigated, if at all, and not just one transaction. While the committee has the powers to decide what to investigate, I feel that this approach is too selective, especially bearing in mind that it is public knowledge that the EFCC has already taken steps — meaning they have investigated and reached a certain level. I thought the Committee need not investigate that particular transaction, even though it has the powers to do so. I recused myself because the person affected is a former governor of my state — my predecessor in office, and I have a policy of not joining to fight or pull down anyone. I am not like other politicians from my area or the typical politicians in Nigeria who celebrate the downfall of opponents and people they disagree with. The person concerned and I have been on different ends, leading different tendencies in various political battles in my state since 2011 till date. While we do not meet or speak or pursue any common political agenda, and we have not been in the same party since 2011, I do not practise politics that involves pulling people down or contributing to their problems. I have always limited political contest to campaigns during elections, where I outplan, out-campaign, strategize, and defeat them on the ground and through legal processes, but never by trying to bring anyone down after elections. As part of this policy I have extended support and encouragement to all who operate at the federal level in spite of political or partisan differences, knowing that if political interests do not align until elections, we will then resolve such differences at the polls. As I have always told our people, “we are few”; everyone is important. If you cannot help someone, leave the person alone, and don't destroy them. That has been my policy, which I have practised and taught for several years. As I have always maintained, I am in politics for service to God and man — I build, I raise, I develop, I defend; I don't destroy or pull down. I know that they don’t treat me the same way. When they are in a position to bring me down, they don't spare anything to achieve that goal, but to the glory of God, they have not succeeded so far, and God is still on His throne. I know these are very trying times, particularly for the people affected, and I do not intend to add to anyone’s problems. It is God who has always fought my battles and has ensured that my opponents, despite all they do using federal power or federal might, blackmail or propaganda, incitements, in spite of all these, they have not defeated my tendency till date. Even when all the major political figures unite against me, backed by federal might and greater resources, they still lose, as my politics is achored on God and the support and prayers of men — not on violence, destruction and pulling people down or celebrating their misfortune and downfall. It is on account of this that I explained my position to my colleagues in the committee, who saw reason with me, and I left. As a former governor, I feel I have a lifelong responsibility of support and fairness to all Bayelsans; which is why I have protected, supported, and encouraged all persons from my state, from the Niger Delta region, and all Nigerians, irrespective of party, till date on all issues that have been brought before me.

A few days ago, at the meeting of the Senate Committee on Local Content, I had cause to recuse myself when I got to know that it was an investigative hearing summoned to investigate allegations of diversion of $14.8m against the former Minister of State for Petroleum Resources, Chief Timipre Sylva. As I explained, I attended believing it was an interactive forum with the Executive Secretary and his team. When I discovered that the hearing was specifically summoned for that purpose, I raised objections—firstly, on the ground that there should be no selective inquiry; that the entirety of the management of the fund, perhaps from inception, should be investigated, if at all, and not just one transaction. While the committee has the powers to decide what to investigate, I feel that this approach is too selective, especially bearing in mind that it is public knowledge that the EFCC has already taken steps — meaning they have investigated and reached a certain level. I thought the Committee need not investigate that particular transaction, even though it has the powers to do so. I recused myself because the person affected is a former governor of my state — my predecessor in office, and I have a policy of not joining to fight or pull down anyone. I am not like other politicians from my area or the typical politicians in Nigeria who celebrate the downfall of opponents and people they disagree with. The person concerned and I have been on different ends, leading different tendencies in various political battles in my state since 2011 till date. While we do not meet or speak or pursue any common political agenda, and we have not been in the same party since 2011, I do not practise politics that involves pulling people down or contributing to their problems. I have always limited political contest to campaigns during elections, where I outplan, out-campaign, strategize, and defeat them on the ground and through legal processes, but never by trying to bring anyone down after elections. As part of this policy I have extended support and encouragement to all who operate at the federal level in spite of political or partisan differences, knowing that if political interests do not align until elections, we will then resolve such differences at the polls. As I have always told our people, “we are few”; everyone is important. If you cannot help someone, leave the person alone, and don't destroy them. That has been my policy, which I have practised and taught for several years. As I have always maintained, I am in politics for service to God and man — I build, I raise, I develop, I defend; I don't destroy or pull down. I know that they don’t treat me the same way. When they are in a position to bring me down, they don't spare anything to achieve that goal, but to the glory of God, they have not succeeded so far, and God is still on His throne. I know these are very trying times, particularly for the people affected, and I do not intend to add to anyone’s problems. It is God who has always fought my battles and has ensured that my opponents, despite all they do using federal power or federal might, blackmail or propaganda, incitements, in spite of all these, they have not defeated my tendency till date. Even when all the major political figures unite against me, backed by federal might and greater resources, they still lose, as my politics is achored on God and the support and prayers of men — not on violence, destruction and pulling people down or celebrating their misfortune and downfall. It is on account of this that I explained my position to my colleagues in the committee, who saw reason with me, and I left. As a former governor, I feel I have a lifelong responsibility of support and fairness to all Bayelsans; which is why I have protected, supported, and encouraged all persons from my state, from the Niger Delta region, and all Nigerians, irrespective of party, till date on all issues that have been brought before me.

Henry Seriake Dickson

28,972 次观看 • 7 个月前

VIDEO Democratic Front (DF) president Mathias Mpuuga on #TheGrindPodcast with Patrick Kamara 933 KFM: 1. "...I am an active politician, I have moved in every inch and space of this country. I know where his [General Yoweri Museveni support is, it is not 71% it is not even 50%, and he knows it too." 2. "I am on record before and after the elections for having spoken out. I went out of my way and wrote to every political party in the opposition, warning and inviting them for a commonality of purpose...Immediately after the elections, I held a press conference spoke about the same issues, I had warned colleagues about that we never cared about and they happened. So, I feel that I am vindicated to the fact that I raised the alarm. Those who didn’t care, there is no much I could do to drag them." 3. "Also I could have raised the challenge about that election in the supreme court, but I was not a presidential candidate and I did not have permission to raise the same on behalf of any candidate. Remember that in one of the amendments that I had intended in the presidential elections act probably out of ignorance or excitement, was to amend the law to the fact that a citizen can challenge the election in a supreme court as long as that citizen is a voter and there is a proof that his challenge is not a waste of court’s time. I had intended that when that happens when presidential candidates are either compromised or timid, a courageous citizen can challenge that election. That didn’t happen, and the opportunity was lost." 4. "What have I done as DF? The DF is is going to challenge particular actions leading to that election and our petition to the Constitutional court is ready, if you want to know how we have moved and that we are not sleeping as the DF." #RealChangeActNow

VIDEO Democratic Front (DF) president Mathias Mpuuga on #TheGrindPodcast with Patrick Kamara 933 KFM: 1. "...I am an active politician, I have moved in every inch and space of this country. I know where his [General Yoweri Museveni support is, it is not 71% it is not even 50%, and he knows it too." 2. "I am on record before and after the elections for having spoken out. I went out of my way and wrote to every political party in the opposition, warning and inviting them for a commonality of purpose...Immediately after the elections, I held a press conference spoke about the same issues, I had warned colleagues about that we never cared about and they happened. So, I feel that I am vindicated to the fact that I raised the alarm. Those who didn’t care, there is no much I could do to drag them." 3. "Also I could have raised the challenge about that election in the supreme court, but I was not a presidential candidate and I did not have permission to raise the same on behalf of any candidate. Remember that in one of the amendments that I had intended in the presidential elections act probably out of ignorance or excitement, was to amend the law to the fact that a citizen can challenge the election in a supreme court as long as that citizen is a voter and there is a proof that his challenge is not a waste of court’s time. I had intended that when that happens when presidential candidates are either compromised or timid, a courageous citizen can challenge that election. That didn’t happen, and the opportunity was lost." 4. "What have I done as DF? The DF is is going to challenge particular actions leading to that election and our petition to the Constitutional court is ready, if you want to know how we have moved and that we are not sleeping as the DF." #RealChangeActNow

Democratic Front (DF)

20,784 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Scott Jennings schools Ana Navarro on CNN NewsNight after she calls the $1.8 billion DOJ fund to compensate victims of unfair lawfare “reparations.”: Navarro: “Republicans used to balk and be shocked and uh outraged by the idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're going to be giving money to uh January 6th insurrectionists. That part's okay. Yeah, it's it's disgusting.” … Jennings: Have you ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] I have been unfairly targeted by this administration, yeah. Jennings] Have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] Are those the people that are going to be in uh in this— Jennings] So the answer is no, you haven't. So so the issue is, the question is, has anyone in the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Of course they have. And there ought to be just at a top line a way for people to seek recourse if they have been unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started and he was initially seeking damages for that, which he has given up. He'll receive no money as I understand it. And now it has morphed into this idea that there have been people that have been unfairly targeted…. I want a uh do I want a world where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government and it was truly unfair and you truly were had something done to you that should not have been done, do I think people should be able to seek recourse for that? Absolutely I do because I think it probably happens and not on a partisan basis but it probably happens all the time. And I think people ought to be able to seek uh some sort of damages if they've been unfairly targeted by the department or by the federal government.”

.Scott Jennings schools Ana Navarro on CNN NewsNight after she calls the $1.8 billion DOJ fund to compensate victims of unfair lawfare “reparations.”: Navarro: “Republicans used to balk and be shocked and uh outraged by the idea of reparations to people who suffered slavery. But we're going to be giving money to uh January 6th insurrectionists. That part's okay. Yeah, it's it's disgusting.” … Jennings: Have you ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] I have been unfairly targeted by this administration, yeah. Jennings] Have you been unfairly prosecuted by the Department of Justice? Navarro] Are those the people that are going to be in uh in this— Jennings] So the answer is no, you haven't. So so the issue is, the question is, has anyone in the history of the United States ever been unfairly targeted by the Department of Justice? Of course they have. And there ought to be just at a top line a way for people to seek recourse if they have been unfairly targeted. That having been said, this all started by the fact that Donald Trump had his tax returns unfairly and illegally leaked by the IRS. That's where all this started and he was initially seeking damages for that, which he has given up. He'll receive no money as I understand it. And now it has morphed into this idea that there have been people that have been unfairly targeted…. I want a uh do I want a world where if you've been unfairly targeted by the federal government and it was truly unfair and you truly were had something done to you that should not have been done, do I think people should be able to seek recourse for that? Absolutely I do because I think it probably happens and not on a partisan basis but it probably happens all the time. And I think people ought to be able to seek uh some sort of damages if they've been unfairly targeted by the department or by the federal government.”

Steve Guest

23,762 次观看 • 1 个月前

Don't believe what some say in the news about the Memorial. Here is what President Woodrow Wilson said on Dedication Day June 4, 1914 | Arlington National Cemetery | Dedication Day | Reconciliation Memorial I assure you that I am profoundly aware of the solemn significance of the thing that has now taken place. The Daughters of the Confederacy have presented a memorial of their dead to the Government of the United States. I hope that you have noted the history of the conception of this idea. It was suggested by a President of the United States who had himself been a distinguished officer in the Union Army. It was authorized by an act of Congress of the United States. The corner-stone of the monument was laid by a President of the United States elevated to his position by the votes of the party which had chiefly prided itself upon sustaining the war for the Union, and who, while Secretary of War, had himself given authority to erect it. And, now, it has fallen to my lot to accept in the name of the great Government, which I am privileged for the time to represent, this emblem of a reunited people. I am not so much happy as proud to participate in this capacity on such an occasion: proud that I should represent such a people. Am I mistaken, ladies and gentlemen, in supposing that nothing of this sort could have occurred in anything but a democracy? The people of a democracy are not related to their rulers as subjects are related to a government. They are themselves the sovereign authority, and as they are neighbors of each other, quickened by the same influences and moved by the same motives, they can understand each other. They are shot through with some of the deepest and profoundest instincts of human sympathy. They choose their governments; they select their rulers; they live their own life, and they will not have that life disturbed and discolored by fraternal misunderstandings. I know that a reuniting of spirits like this can take place more quickly in our time than in any other because men are now united by an easier transmission of those influences which make up the foundations of peace and of mutual understanding, but no process can work these effects unless there is a conducting medium. The conducting medium in this instance is the united heart of a great people. I am not going to detain you by trying to repeat any of the eloquent thoughts which have moved us this afternoon, for I rejoice in the simplicity of the task which is assigned to me. My privilege is this, ladies and gentlemen: To declare this chapter in the history of the United States closed and ended, and I bid you turn with me with your faces to the future, quickened by the memories of the past, but with nothing to do with the contests of the past, knowing, as we have shed our blood upon opposite sides, we now face and admire one another. I do not know how many years ago it was that the Century Dictionary was published, but I remember one day in the Century Cyclopedia of Names I had occasion to turn to the name of Robert E. Lee, and I found him there in that book published in New York City simply described as a great American general. The generosity of our judgments did not begin to-day. The generosity of our judgment was made up soon after this great struggle was over. Men came and sat together again in the Congress and united in all the efforts of peace and of government, and our solemn duty is to see that each one of us is in his own consciousness and in his own conduct a replica of this great reunited people. It is our duty and our privilege to be like the country we represent and, speaking no word of malice, no word of criticism even, stand shoulder to shoulder to lift the burdens of mankind in the future and show the paths of freedom to all the world. Please consider reposting. Thank you. @SecDef Pete Hegseth Christopher Bedford The Associated Press Brion McClanahan

Don't believe what some say in the news about the Memorial. Here is what President Woodrow Wilson said on Dedication Day June 4, 1914 | Arlington National Cemetery | Dedication Day | Reconciliation Memorial I assure you that I am profoundly aware of the solemn significance of the thing that has now taken place. The Daughters of the Confederacy have presented a memorial of their dead to the Government of the United States. I hope that you have noted the history of the conception of this idea. It was suggested by a President of the United States who had himself been a distinguished officer in the Union Army. It was authorized by an act of Congress of the United States. The corner-stone of the monument was laid by a President of the United States elevated to his position by the votes of the party which had chiefly prided itself upon sustaining the war for the Union, and who, while Secretary of War, had himself given authority to erect it. And, now, it has fallen to my lot to accept in the name of the great Government, which I am privileged for the time to represent, this emblem of a reunited people. I am not so much happy as proud to participate in this capacity on such an occasion: proud that I should represent such a people. Am I mistaken, ladies and gentlemen, in supposing that nothing of this sort could have occurred in anything but a democracy? The people of a democracy are not related to their rulers as subjects are related to a government. They are themselves the sovereign authority, and as they are neighbors of each other, quickened by the same influences and moved by the same motives, they can understand each other. They are shot through with some of the deepest and profoundest instincts of human sympathy. They choose their governments; they select their rulers; they live their own life, and they will not have that life disturbed and discolored by fraternal misunderstandings. I know that a reuniting of spirits like this can take place more quickly in our time than in any other because men are now united by an easier transmission of those influences which make up the foundations of peace and of mutual understanding, but no process can work these effects unless there is a conducting medium. The conducting medium in this instance is the united heart of a great people. I am not going to detain you by trying to repeat any of the eloquent thoughts which have moved us this afternoon, for I rejoice in the simplicity of the task which is assigned to me. My privilege is this, ladies and gentlemen: To declare this chapter in the history of the United States closed and ended, and I bid you turn with me with your faces to the future, quickened by the memories of the past, but with nothing to do with the contests of the past, knowing, as we have shed our blood upon opposite sides, we now face and admire one another. I do not know how many years ago it was that the Century Dictionary was published, but I remember one day in the Century Cyclopedia of Names I had occasion to turn to the name of Robert E. Lee, and I found him there in that book published in New York City simply described as a great American general. The generosity of our judgments did not begin to-day. The generosity of our judgment was made up soon after this great struggle was over. Men came and sat together again in the Congress and united in all the efforts of peace and of government, and our solemn duty is to see that each one of us is in his own consciousness and in his own conduct a replica of this great reunited people. It is our duty and our privilege to be like the country we represent and, speaking no word of malice, no word of criticism even, stand shoulder to shoulder to lift the burdens of mankind in the future and show the paths of freedom to all the world. Please consider reposting. Thank you. @SecDef Pete Hegseth Christopher Bedford The Associated Press Brion McClanahan

Defend Arlington

34,733 次观看 • 11 个月前

Ana Navarro LOSES IT after President Trump’s former communications director Caroline Sunshine hits her with a very inconvenient question. Navarro was rattling off the names of people she claimed were killed by ICE — but the moment Sunshine asked her to name some of the Americans killed by illegals, suddenly Navarro’s memory stopped working. NAVARRO: “There’s been now at least five people killed by ICE in the streets of America.” “Rubén Martinez…they killed in San Padre Island in Texas. Silverio Villegas Gonzalez. Keith Porter, they killed him in LA. Renee Good and Alex Pretti, they killed them in Minnesota. And now Lorenzo Salgado Araujo.” SUNSHINE: “Do you know the names, as well, of Americans who’ve been killed by illegal immigrants? Do you have that list too?” NAVARRO: “I know some of the…I know some of the names. I don’t have the list, but I do know some of the names.” SUNSHINE: “What are their names? What are some of their names?” NAVARRO: “Listen…we have heard all the names!” SUNSHINE: “No, just what are some of the names?” NAVARRO: “This is not me doing a contest of whether you know the names or whether I know the names.” “I want to pronounce…I want to pronounce these names because I think it’s…because I think we need to put names and faces and stories.” SUNSHINE: “I agree! Absolutely. And to the faces of Americans who have been killed by illegal immigrants as well. We absolutely have to put faces and names to that.” “What are their names?” “Laken Riley.” “Jocelyn Nungaray.” “Kate Steinle.” NAVARRO: “And, and what are the names of people that have been killed by U.S. citizens?!” SUNSHINE: “How is that relevant to this discussion?” “You can’t say the names!”

Ana Navarro LOSES IT after President Trump’s former communications director Caroline Sunshine hits her with a very inconvenient question. Navarro was rattling off the names of people she claimed were killed by ICE — but the moment Sunshine asked her to name some of the Americans killed by illegals, suddenly Navarro’s memory stopped working. NAVARRO: “There’s been now at least five people killed by ICE in the streets of America.” “Rubén Martinez…they killed in San Padre Island in Texas. Silverio Villegas Gonzalez. Keith Porter, they killed him in LA. Renee Good and Alex Pretti, they killed them in Minnesota. And now Lorenzo Salgado Araujo.” SUNSHINE: “Do you know the names, as well, of Americans who’ve been killed by illegal immigrants? Do you have that list too?” NAVARRO: “I know some of the…I know some of the names. I don’t have the list, but I do know some of the names.” SUNSHINE: “What are their names? What are some of their names?” NAVARRO: “Listen…we have heard all the names!” SUNSHINE: “No, just what are some of the names?” NAVARRO: “This is not me doing a contest of whether you know the names or whether I know the names.” “I want to pronounce…I want to pronounce these names because I think it’s…because I think we need to put names and faces and stories.” SUNSHINE: “I agree! Absolutely. And to the faces of Americans who have been killed by illegal immigrants as well. We absolutely have to put faces and names to that.” “What are their names?” “Laken Riley.” “Jocelyn Nungaray.” “Kate Steinle.” NAVARRO: “And, and what are the names of people that have been killed by U.S. citizens?!” SUNSHINE: “How is that relevant to this discussion?” “You can’t say the names!”

Overton

334,287 次观看 • 1 天前

"Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that." ~Mellon Whistleblowers, Fear and Mellon Calls Out Congress (This is all you know to need to know about why we're stuck in the mud with Disclosure. As I said yesterday, Congress is dragging ass. And, as I (and others) have repeatedly stated: We need protection for whistleblowers.) Kurt McConnell - Former Senate Intelligence Committee Staffer: "The key to this, in my opinion, is firsthand sources who can testify to direct involvement in the so-called Legacy program of crash retrievals, reverse engineering. Unfortunately, there are people out there, I believe, from many reports, that are interested in coming forward and telling their story, but they are very much intimidated and frightened about doing that. They're afraid of the consequences, including their own personal safety, is what they relate. Their personal safety, certainly their career, starting with their security clearances, which is the means that they have to make a living. And they have observed some folks who have come forward - not to mention you, Lue, and Dave Grusch - and have seen what those folks have gone through, and most of them say, 'Yeah, I'm not doing that.' "So, I think we're sort of in a tough situation. It's almost like Catch 22. We need more primary sources. But it's hard to get people with that kind of information to come forward because of the fear of retaliation." Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office: "We need a better whistleblower protection." McConnell: "Sir, that's something that I'm sure, as you know, has been discussed in both the Senate and the House." Burchett: "Why don't you draw me something up, really tight." McConnell: "Yes, sir. So, whistleblower protections and finding ways to even compensate them if they do have negative consequences from coming forward, and so forth. So, I certainly think this is a major factor." Christopher K. Mellon: "I came prepared to contribute what I could to that question as well but the classified session was canceled, I think, due to the sensitivity of the names of the individuals and so forth. I didn't think it was appropriate to (hard to make out his words here) to do it in an unclassified setting. If they do reschedule the classified setting, I think I'm more than happy to try to provide some very specifics. "I published a Signal message I received from a very senior government official. He described a specific Secretary-of-the-Air-Force memorandum. He described a specific recovery site. He named the Air Force gatekeeper for the program. Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that. I have all that information. I was prepared to share what I could about that but I don't that it would be definitive or lead to any conclusion. But I do think those names, due to the privacy concerns of the individuals and so forth, obviously that's pretty sensitive, so..." Read the Signal message here:

"Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that." ~Mellon Whistleblowers, Fear and Mellon Calls Out Congress (This is all you know to need to know about why we're stuck in the mud with Disclosure. As I said yesterday, Congress is dragging ass. And, as I (and others) have repeatedly stated: We need protection for whistleblowers.) Kurt McConnell - Former Senate Intelligence Committee Staffer: "The key to this, in my opinion, is firsthand sources who can testify to direct involvement in the so-called Legacy program of crash retrievals, reverse engineering. Unfortunately, there are people out there, I believe, from many reports, that are interested in coming forward and telling their story, but they are very much intimidated and frightened about doing that. They're afraid of the consequences, including their own personal safety, is what they relate. Their personal safety, certainly their career, starting with their security clearances, which is the means that they have to make a living. And they have observed some folks who have come forward - not to mention you, Lue, and Dave Grusch - and have seen what those folks have gone through, and most of them say, 'Yeah, I'm not doing that.' "So, I think we're sort of in a tough situation. It's almost like Catch 22. We need more primary sources. But it's hard to get people with that kind of information to come forward because of the fear of retaliation." Rep. Tim Burchett Press Office: "We need a better whistleblower protection." McConnell: "Sir, that's something that I'm sure, as you know, has been discussed in both the Senate and the House." Burchett: "Why don't you draw me something up, really tight." McConnell: "Yes, sir. So, whistleblower protections and finding ways to even compensate them if they do have negative consequences from coming forward, and so forth. So, I certainly think this is a major factor." Christopher K. Mellon: "I came prepared to contribute what I could to that question as well but the classified session was canceled, I think, due to the sensitivity of the names of the individuals and so forth. I didn't think it was appropriate to (hard to make out his words here) to do it in an unclassified setting. If they do reschedule the classified setting, I think I'm more than happy to try to provide some very specifics. "I published a Signal message I received from a very senior government official. He described a specific Secretary-of-the-Air-Force memorandum. He described a specific recovery site. He named the Air Force gatekeeper for the program. Nobody from Congress has asked me to follow up on that. I have all that information. I was prepared to share what I could about that but I don't that it would be definitive or lead to any conclusion. But I do think those names, due to the privacy concerns of the individuals and so forth, obviously that's pretty sensitive, so..." Read the Signal message here:

Joe Murgia

13,155 次观看 • 1 年前

When I saw the mask "Tribes of the Calf" from Kanbas I knew I had to make it into reality. The jewelry and gold really made it stand out for me. Since Sam Spratt's The Masquerade was revealed, I have been spending time sculpting and dissecting the mask to recreate it in 3D as faithfully as possible. I delved into the creation of this mask for many reasons. I love a good challenge and this mask surely was one for me. Creating something in 3D from a 2D image is not easy, and especially when the source has generative nature, some stuff is hard to interpret, but I tried my best to make sure the visual integrity of the mask is as close to the original as possible. Splitting the whole mask into parts, filling the missing pieces so I can build the textures was quite a lot of work. I tried to present the mask in my own style with a slightly different colorway to adapt to the mask itself. Please enjoy this short animation, and turn on sound🔊 This piece is my statement that I am here to stay. That I have a voice that often feels being lost in the void. That I have been creating and posting digital art for over 20 years now and will continue until I'm gone. I have a story to tell and I want to be heard. The space we have here is small, and is shrinking day by day. It doesn't have to be like that. We need to support each other and push ourselves and people here, otherwise we are all doomed. As Kanbas has put in their observation of the mask: "Inspirational. Emotional. Natural." This is what our space can be, and this is me making a statement with this homage. I will share a 4k still below as well as a short video showing the 3D GLB interactive model together with a yt link to the 4k video since compression here is pretty bad.

When I saw the mask "Tribes of the Calf" from Kanbas I knew I had to make it into reality. The jewelry and gold really made it stand out for me. Since Sam Spratt's The Masquerade was revealed, I have been spending time sculpting and dissecting the mask to recreate it in 3D as faithfully as possible. I delved into the creation of this mask for many reasons. I love a good challenge and this mask surely was one for me. Creating something in 3D from a 2D image is not easy, and especially when the source has generative nature, some stuff is hard to interpret, but I tried my best to make sure the visual integrity of the mask is as close to the original as possible. Splitting the whole mask into parts, filling the missing pieces so I can build the textures was quite a lot of work. I tried to present the mask in my own style with a slightly different colorway to adapt to the mask itself. Please enjoy this short animation, and turn on sound🔊 This piece is my statement that I am here to stay. That I have a voice that often feels being lost in the void. That I have been creating and posting digital art for over 20 years now and will continue until I'm gone. I have a story to tell and I want to be heard. The space we have here is small, and is shrinking day by day. It doesn't have to be like that. We need to support each other and push ourselves and people here, otherwise we are all doomed. As Kanbas has put in their observation of the mask: "Inspirational. Emotional. Natural." This is what our space can be, and this is me making a statement with this homage. I will share a 4k still below as well as a short video showing the 3D GLB interactive model together with a yt link to the 4k video since compression here is pretty bad.

shoneec

17,531 次观看 • 1 年前