Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Energy security cannot be outsourced. National interest must come before geopolitical pressure. Every sovereign nation has the right—and the responsibility—to make decisions that protect its people's welfare. For a country like India, which imports most of its crude oil, affordable and reliable energy is not a luxury; it is... an economic necessity. The real question is not whether India should support one global power or another. The real question is whether India's foreign policy is guided by its own long-term national interest or by external pressure. Strategic autonomy means maintaining balanced relations with all countries while making independent decisions based on economics, security, and the well-being of citizens. Energy policy should be driven by transparent commercial, legal, and strategic considerations—not by fear or political pressure from any side. A truly confident democracy protects its sovereignty not through slogans, but through independent decision-making, diversification of energy sources, and diplomacy that serves its people first. National interest should never become a casualty of global power politics. Video:show more

Ashok Dadhwal

5,124 subscribers

13,252 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

Azad Bhagat Singh2 months ago

Indians 🤝 @Iran_in_India . We Indian accept that deal forgot coward M@di ..

Mahendrasinh Brahmbhatt fearless journalist2 months ago

भारत का पीएम कौन है ट्रम्प?

Adig2 months ago

Americans are biased towards India and short sighted

Pulo Gapak2 months ago

If that's the case then India and Iran should sign a MoU that Iran will never enrich it's uranium for nuclear weapon purpose.And every other nation should make deal with Iran crude oil deal in exchange for no enrichment of uranium for nuclear weapon purpose.

Sanket Gundecha2 months ago

Now if the Modi Government is refusing the proposal, it would b a backfire on new decisions

Sabir Hussain2 months ago

विदेशी कूटनीति सामयिक व हितकारी हो, भारत का इक़बाल बुलंद रहे, प्राथमिकता होनी चाहिए ।

Yousuf Mohd👁️✍️👁️2 months ago

हिजडाइल को फ़ादर लंड कौन बोला है ? सरेंडर कौन हुवा है ? बात खत्म

Pulo Gapak2 months ago

Citizens and public of India is with Government.Modiji should purchase crude oil from Iran irrespective of America's ultimatum.

Dilip bhandari2 months ago

Darey nahi mauka mat chukiye Modiji sanctions nahi lagange China ki tarah taakatwar haniya Kabhi toh naa kehna seedhiya Tol kar boliye per boliye sarkar Yeh roj daranyge kab tak darenge sher kabhi gidadoo se nahin darta bharat ki singh hai aap ek nazar hi kaafi haijaimatrubhoomi

Pulo Gapak2 months ago

We are ready to face the consequences.Let's stand against America.

Related Videos

Big Breaking Jolt 🚨 🚨 This is not just a trade proposal — it is an economic threat aimed straight at India. The U.S. bill proposing 500% tariffs on countries buying Russian oil, now backed by Donald Trump, directly targets India’s energy lifeline. India turned to discounted Russian crude to protect its economy, control inflation, and shield ordinary citizens from global fuel shocks created by Western wars and sanctions. If enforced, these tariffs will hit India on multiple fronts. • Fuel prices will surge, pushing transport and food costs higher. • Inflation will rise, squeezing households already under pressure. • Manufacturing and exports will suffer, as higher energy costs reduce competitiveness. • Strategic autonomy will be undermined, forcing India to choose between national interest and external coercion. India did not create the Ukraine war. India did not impose sanctions on itself. Yet India is now being punished for making a sovereign decision to secure affordable energy for 1.4 billion people. This move exposes the real nature of U.S. pressure politics — compliance over partnership, punishment over cooperation. Venezuela was dealt with militarily. India is being cornered economically. The question before India is no longer about oil alone. It is about whether global powers will respect India’s independent foreign policy or attempt to break it through economic intimidation, perhaps owing to its weak spineless leadership. Why India is being targeted with 500% tariffs, Zero Respect and Daily Humiliation — how U.S. pressure politics threatens India. Are we missing something here❓ Is there something that Modi Govt is hiding from India❓ Nonetheless, it’s a bloody rotten fish here‼️ #Trump #Modi #USA #India #Tariffs #ModiFailedIndia #ModiHaitoMumkinHai

Big Breaking Jolt 🚨 🚨 This is not just a trade proposal — it is an economic threat aimed straight at India. The U.S. bill proposing 500% tariffs on countries buying Russian oil, now backed by Donald Trump, directly targets India’s energy lifeline. India turned to discounted Russian crude to protect its economy, control inflation, and shield ordinary citizens from global fuel shocks created by Western wars and sanctions. If enforced, these tariffs will hit India on multiple fronts. • Fuel prices will surge, pushing transport and food costs higher. • Inflation will rise, squeezing households already under pressure. • Manufacturing and exports will suffer, as higher energy costs reduce competitiveness. • Strategic autonomy will be undermined, forcing India to choose between national interest and external coercion. India did not create the Ukraine war. India did not impose sanctions on itself. Yet India is now being punished for making a sovereign decision to secure affordable energy for 1.4 billion people. This move exposes the real nature of U.S. pressure politics — compliance over partnership, punishment over cooperation. Venezuela was dealt with militarily. India is being cornered economically. The question before India is no longer about oil alone. It is about whether global powers will respect India’s independent foreign policy or attempt to break it through economic intimidation, perhaps owing to its weak spineless leadership. Why India is being targeted with 500% tariffs, Zero Respect and Daily Humiliation — how U.S. pressure politics threatens India. Are we missing something here❓ Is there something that Modi Govt is hiding from India❓ Nonetheless, it’s a bloody rotten fish here‼️ #Trump #Modi #USA #India #Tariffs #ModiFailedIndia #ModiHaitoMumkinHai

Pragnya Gupta

11,311 views • 8 months ago

🚨 ENERGY POLICY OR IDEOLOGY? Germany shut down its nuclear plants. At the same time: France is building more. China is expanding capacity at scale. The United States is investing in next-generation reactors. Meanwhile German households and industry face some of the highest energy costs in the developed world. This isn’t just an environmental debate. It’s an economic and strategic one. Energy policy determines: • Industrial competitiveness • National security • Cost of living • Long-term growth When a major industrial nation deliberately removes reliable baseload power from its system, the consequences ripple across the entire economy — from manufacturing output to household bills. The question many voters are now asking is straightforward: Is policy being driven by engineering reality… or by political ideology? Because energy systems ultimately obey physics — not narratives.

🚨 ENERGY POLICY OR IDEOLOGY? Germany shut down its nuclear plants. At the same time: France is building more. China is expanding capacity at scale. The United States is investing in next-generation reactors. Meanwhile German households and industry face some of the highest energy costs in the developed world. This isn’t just an environmental debate. It’s an economic and strategic one. Energy policy determines: • Industrial competitiveness • National security • Cost of living • Long-term growth When a major industrial nation deliberately removes reliable baseload power from its system, the consequences ripple across the entire economy — from manufacturing output to household bills. The question many voters are now asking is straightforward: Is policy being driven by engineering reality… or by political ideology? Because energy systems ultimately obey physics — not narratives.

Jim Ferguson

20,368 views • 7 months ago

Far left in India - Pakistan has become a Vishwa Guru. India’s foreign policy failed as we didn’t become the mediator. Well Pakistan was not a mediator they were a MESSENGER! COPY PASTE MESSENGER. Why didn’t India mediate the US–Iran ceasefire? Because foreign policy is driven by strategy, not branding. Some people argue that India missed an opportunity while Pakistan gained visibility. But this ignores key realities. First, pressure and dependency. Countries like Pakistan operate under multiple external pressures, including financial support from powers like the United States, China, and institutions like the International Monetary Fund. This influences their diplomatic role. Second, global context. Mediation is usually led by European nations, but current tensions and disagreements with leaders like Donald Trump have limited their involvement. This created space for others. Third, India’s strategy. India follows strategic autonomy. Whether in the Russia–Ukraine War or Middle East tensions, India prioritizes energy security and balanced relations over short-term optics. India did not step back. It chose long-term national interest over temporary global attention.

Far left in India - Pakistan has become a Vishwa Guru. India’s foreign policy failed as we didn’t become the mediator. Well Pakistan was not a mediator they were a MESSENGER! COPY PASTE MESSENGER. Why didn’t India mediate the US–Iran ceasefire? Because foreign policy is driven by strategy, not branding. Some people argue that India missed an opportunity while Pakistan gained visibility. But this ignores key realities. First, pressure and dependency. Countries like Pakistan operate under multiple external pressures, including financial support from powers like the United States, China, and institutions like the International Monetary Fund. This influences their diplomatic role. Second, global context. Mediation is usually led by European nations, but current tensions and disagreements with leaders like Donald Trump have limited their involvement. This created space for others. Third, India’s strategy. India follows strategic autonomy. Whether in the Russia–Ukraine War or Middle East tensions, India prioritizes energy security and balanced relations over short-term optics. India did not step back. It chose long-term national interest over temporary global attention.

Praffulgarg

36,354 views • 5 months ago

🇧🇩 BNP Sends Clear Message to India on Future Relations 🇮🇳 The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) Foreign Policy Advisor has called on India to “reset its mindset” regarding Bangladesh, signalling a shift in expectations for bilateral ties. 🔑 Key Points: Bangladesh seeks a constructive relationship with India, but one based on mutual respect and balance. BNP made it clear that Awami League is no longer in power and will not return, urging India to accept this political reality. Stressed that the sooner India adjusts, the better it will be for India’s own strategic interests. Emphasised that future relations must take Bangladesh’s national interests into proper consideration. Delivered a blunt reminder: “The good old days are over.” Signalled that the future of Bangladesh–India relations will be more assertive, sovereign, and interest-driven. 🕊️ Bangladesh is open to cooperation — but not at the cost of its national dignity or interests. #Bangladesh #BNP #India #ForeignPolicy #Diplomacy #SouthAsia #NationalInterest #BDMilitary

🇧🇩 BNP Sends Clear Message to India on Future Relations 🇮🇳 The Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) Foreign Policy Advisor has called on India to “reset its mindset” regarding Bangladesh, signalling a shift in expectations for bilateral ties. 🔑 Key Points: Bangladesh seeks a constructive relationship with India, but one based on mutual respect and balance. BNP made it clear that Awami League is no longer in power and will not return, urging India to accept this political reality. Stressed that the sooner India adjusts, the better it will be for India’s own strategic interests. Emphasised that future relations must take Bangladesh’s national interests into proper consideration. Delivered a blunt reminder: “The good old days are over.” Signalled that the future of Bangladesh–India relations will be more assertive, sovereign, and interest-driven. 🕊️ Bangladesh is open to cooperation — but not at the cost of its national dignity or interests. #Bangladesh #BNP #India #ForeignPolicy #Diplomacy #SouthAsia #NationalInterest #BDMilitary

BDMilitary

12,893 views • 8 months ago

Rebuilding Venezuela’s oil infrastructure is not, and should never be, the responsibility of the American taxpayer. Reconstruction will take several years and could cost $100B or more, with any profits flowing straight to the oil companies, not to American families who are already struggling with high costs. Foreign policy decisions should be guided by our national security interests and the Constitution, not open-ended, risky commitments made after the fact. Taxpayer dollars should be invested here at home, building American clean, cheap energy.

Rebuilding Venezuela’s oil infrastructure is not, and should never be, the responsibility of the American taxpayer. Reconstruction will take several years and could cost $100B or more, with any profits flowing straight to the oil companies, not to American families who are already struggling with high costs. Foreign policy decisions should be guided by our national security interests and the Constitution, not open-ended, risky commitments made after the fact. Taxpayer dollars should be invested here at home, building American clean, cheap energy.

Rep. Mike Levin

22,167 views • 8 months ago

What happens to a country when its leaders stop asking what kind of nation they want to preserve? Immigration is a subject where people can have completely different opinions, but there is a basic question that is difficult to avoid. How much immigration can a country absorb while still maintaining control over its borders, its institutions, its infrastructure, and its sense of national identity? The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, but that doesn't mean immigration policy has to be unlimited or that a country has no right to decide who enters and under what conditions. Congress has broad constitutional authority over immigration, including the power to establish rules governing admission and exclusion. There's also a difference between having compassion for individual people and claiming that a government should be able to enforce its own immigration laws. Those ideas don't have to contradict each other. If a nation can't control who enters its territory, enforce the laws it has on the books, or determine the scale and pace of immigration, then the question becomes much bigger than immigration itself. It becomes a question of sovereignty and whether citizens still have meaningful control over the direction of their own country. And that's where the conversation gets uncomfortable. We can debate how many immigrants should be admitted, what legal pathways should look like, and how enforcement should work. But pretending there are no consequences to immigration policy doesn't make those consequences disappear. A country has limited resources, limited infrastructure, and a population with its own history and institutions. Citizens have every right to ask what policies best serve the long term interests of the nation they inherited and hope to pass on to their children. The real question isn't whether America should have immigration. It is whether Americans are still willing to have an honest conversation about what level of immigration is sustainable and what kind of country they want to preserve. If we don't decide what we want our nation to remain, who will?

What happens to a country when its leaders stop asking what kind of nation they want to preserve? Immigration is a subject where people can have completely different opinions, but there is a basic question that is difficult to avoid. How much immigration can a country absorb while still maintaining control over its borders, its institutions, its infrastructure, and its sense of national identity? The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, but that doesn't mean immigration policy has to be unlimited or that a country has no right to decide who enters and under what conditions. Congress has broad constitutional authority over immigration, including the power to establish rules governing admission and exclusion. There's also a difference between having compassion for individual people and claiming that a government should be able to enforce its own immigration laws. Those ideas don't have to contradict each other. If a nation can't control who enters its territory, enforce the laws it has on the books, or determine the scale and pace of immigration, then the question becomes much bigger than immigration itself. It becomes a question of sovereignty and whether citizens still have meaningful control over the direction of their own country. And that's where the conversation gets uncomfortable. We can debate how many immigrants should be admitted, what legal pathways should look like, and how enforcement should work. But pretending there are no consequences to immigration policy doesn't make those consequences disappear. A country has limited resources, limited infrastructure, and a population with its own history and institutions. Citizens have every right to ask what policies best serve the long term interests of the nation they inherited and hope to pass on to their children. The real question isn't whether America should have immigration. It is whether Americans are still willing to have an honest conversation about what level of immigration is sustainable and what kind of country they want to preserve. If we don't decide what we want our nation to remain, who will?

Declaration of Memes

17,122 views • 9 days ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Adani Group Chairman Gautam Adani says, "What has become even more obvious from the recent Middle East conflict and targeted attacks on infrastructure is that energy security and digital security are no longer independent dimensions. They are now the twin foundations of national power. And it is increasingly evident that the country that controls its energy will drive its industrial future. The country that controls its compute will drive its intelligence future, and the country that controls both will shape the century ahead. This is the new geometry of power. If 1947 was about our political freedom, true independence in the 21st century will mean owning the energy that lights our homes and the intelligence that guides our minds. This is not a theory. The two largest economies in the world, the United States and China, have understood this deeply. Their systems may be different. Their politics may be different. Their institutions may be different. But their strategic objectives are the same. No nation can call itself truly self-reliant if it depends on others for the energy that powers its economy or the intelligence that shapes its destiny." (Video source: Adani Group)

#WATCH | Delhi: Adani Group Chairman Gautam Adani says, "What has become even more obvious from the recent Middle East conflict and targeted attacks on infrastructure is that energy security and digital security are no longer independent dimensions. They are now the twin foundations of national power. And it is increasingly evident that the country that controls its energy will drive its industrial future. The country that controls its compute will drive its intelligence future, and the country that controls both will shape the century ahead. This is the new geometry of power. If 1947 was about our political freedom, true independence in the 21st century will mean owning the energy that lights our homes and the intelligence that guides our minds. This is not a theory. The two largest economies in the world, the United States and China, have understood this deeply. Their systems may be different. Their politics may be different. Their institutions may be different. But their strategic objectives are the same. No nation can call itself truly self-reliant if it depends on others for the energy that powers its economy or the intelligence that shapes its destiny." (Video source: Adani Group)

ANI

161,632 views • 4 months ago

‼️🇺🇸🇪🇺Will Europe Stand for Greenland Greenland holds strategic and economic importance in the Arctic, and its future cannot be treated lightly. European leaders emphasize that diplomacy, respect, and cooperation must guide all decisions, reminding the world that Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and its people must decide their path. At the same time, global powers like the United States stress their strategic interests, highlighting the need for nations to safeguard their own security and influence. The Greenland question is more than geography; it’s a test of balance between national interest and international diplomacy. Who will act first, and how, could reshape Arctic strategy for years to come.

‼️🇺🇸🇪🇺Will Europe Stand for Greenland Greenland holds strategic and economic importance in the Arctic, and its future cannot be treated lightly. European leaders emphasize that diplomacy, respect, and cooperation must guide all decisions, reminding the world that Greenland is part of the Kingdom of Denmark and its people must decide their path. At the same time, global powers like the United States stress their strategic interests, highlighting the need for nations to safeguard their own security and influence. The Greenland question is more than geography; it’s a test of balance between national interest and international diplomacy. Who will act first, and how, could reshape Arctic strategy for years to come.

Defense Intelligence

60,185 views • 8 months ago

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: I want to make it very clear that Israel’s actions in Syria should not first be presented or identified within the perspective of Turkish security concerns. It is violating the territorial integrity and sovereignty of a nation-state called Syria, and it is occupying it. It is a major national security threat for Syria, just as it is a national security threat for Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza. Therefore, I think all the Arab countries, the Muslim countries, the regional countries, the Europeans, and everybody else should come together and confront this policy.

Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan: I want to make it very clear that Israel’s actions in Syria should not first be presented or identified within the perspective of Turkish security concerns. It is violating the territorial integrity and sovereignty of a nation-state called Syria, and it is occupying it. It is a major national security threat for Syria, just as it is a national security threat for Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza. Therefore, I think all the Arab countries, the Muslim countries, the regional countries, the Europeans, and everybody else should come together and confront this policy.

Clash Report

69,650 views • 4 months ago

Douglas McGregor, former advisor to the Pentagon and retired US Army Colonel: Iran is not like Iraq or Afghanistan, which could be destroyed through threats and pressure. The United States, like the Titanic, is already sinking and on its way to being submerged. From Iran's perspective, the Strait of Hormuz and national security are not negotiable and are directly linked to the country's independence. The world considers the United States responsible for the crisis in the Persian Gulf, while other countries view Iran's actions as strategically logical and understandable. Unlike Arab countries, Iran is not an artificial state. It is a genuine civilization and a deeply rooted nation-state that cannot be destroyed through threats and pressure.

Douglas McGregor, former advisor to the Pentagon and retired US Army Colonel: Iran is not like Iraq or Afghanistan, which could be destroyed through threats and pressure. The United States, like the Titanic, is already sinking and on its way to being submerged. From Iran's perspective, the Strait of Hormuz and national security are not negotiable and are directly linked to the country's independence. The world considers the United States responsible for the crisis in the Persian Gulf, while other countries view Iran's actions as strategically logical and understandable. Unlike Arab countries, Iran is not an artificial state. It is a genuine civilization and a deeply rooted nation-state that cannot be destroyed through threats and pressure.

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

27,057 views • 16 days ago

India and China Are Face to Face Again: China is threatening India’s national security by expanding strategic infrastructure in the Shaksgam Valley. It lies extremely close to the Siachen Glacier and the Karakoram Range, making it one of the most sensitive regions in the Himalayas. Any large scale construction here directly affects India’s military balance, surveillance capability, and long term border security. China has used this playbook before in Aksai Chin by building first and claiming later. This time, India is responding with strategic roads to Daulat Beg Oldie, ensuring mobility, supplies, and constant monitoring. The lesson is clear. India will not tolerate any compromise on its sovereignty or national security. Jai Hind.

India and China Are Face to Face Again: China is threatening India’s national security by expanding strategic infrastructure in the Shaksgam Valley. It lies extremely close to the Siachen Glacier and the Karakoram Range, making it one of the most sensitive regions in the Himalayas. Any large scale construction here directly affects India’s military balance, surveillance capability, and long term border security. China has used this playbook before in Aksai Chin by building first and claiming later. This time, India is responding with strategic roads to Daulat Beg Oldie, ensuring mobility, supplies, and constant monitoring. The lesson is clear. India will not tolerate any compromise on its sovereignty or national security. Jai Hind.

Praffulgarg

65,466 views • 8 months ago

America said it is ready to sell India as much oil as India wants. Jaishankar’s reply was simple and ice cold. 🇮🇳 “If America puts America First, then India puts India First.” India’s responsibility is to provide affordable and secure energy to 1.4 billion people. Not to satisfy geopolitical pressure from any side. Jaishankar also made another point very clear. India’s ties with Russia are based on national interest, not third country approval. If affordable and reliable oil comes from Russia, India will buy from Russia. If better terms come from elsewhere, India will evaluate those too. That is strategic autonomy. No noise, No aggression, Just clarity. Jaishankar said exactly what needed to be said. 🇮🇳

America said it is ready to sell India as much oil as India wants. Jaishankar’s reply was simple and ice cold. 🇮🇳 “If America puts America First, then India puts India First.” India’s responsibility is to provide affordable and secure energy to 1.4 billion people. Not to satisfy geopolitical pressure from any side. Jaishankar also made another point very clear. India’s ties with Russia are based on national interest, not third country approval. If affordable and reliable oil comes from Russia, India will buy from Russia. If better terms come from elsewhere, India will evaluate those too. That is strategic autonomy. No noise, No aggression, Just clarity. Jaishankar said exactly what needed to be said. 🇮🇳

Military Observer

302,310 views • 4 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On being asked how confident Moscow is about the India-Russia energy cooperation, Russian Ambassador to India, Denis Alipov, says, "The question is - how confident is India? India has shown that it's able to stand its ground and defend its national interests. And when we speak about the sanctions pertaining to oil trade, the tariffs are also related to the cooperation between Russia and India in oil supplies. These interests are paramount for India. We would be ready to supply as much oil as India needs. Unfortunately, those who impose sanctions and tariffs have taken the path of pressure tactics instead of honest cooperation, which prevents those countries from offering a better deal to India in oil than us. The world will not cope if Russian oil is excluded. The energy markets cannot afford that. Russian oil will stay in the market for India and other countries. We are interested in supplying oil to India. India is interested in buying that oil..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On being asked how confident Moscow is about the India-Russia energy cooperation, Russian Ambassador to India, Denis Alipov, says, "The question is - how confident is India? India has shown that it's able to stand its ground and defend its national interests. And when we speak about the sanctions pertaining to oil trade, the tariffs are also related to the cooperation between Russia and India in oil supplies. These interests are paramount for India. We would be ready to supply as much oil as India needs. Unfortunately, those who impose sanctions and tariffs have taken the path of pressure tactics instead of honest cooperation, which prevents those countries from offering a better deal to India in oil than us. The world will not cope if Russian oil is excluded. The energy markets cannot afford that. Russian oil will stay in the market for India and other countries. We are interested in supplying oil to India. India is interested in buying that oil..."

ANI

32,695 views • 18 days ago

🚨 FRANCE TURNS AGAINST BRUSSELS A major shift is happening in France. French media figures and political voices are now openly questioning the entire EU energy system — and calling for a return to national control. The arguments are becoming increasingly direct: • Leave the EU energy market • End sanctions on Russia • Restore cheap Russian gas supplies • Expand nuclear power • Stop reliance on costly wind infrastructure • Break Brussels control over French energy policy Florian Philippot says France once had one of the cheapest and most reliable electricity systems in the world through EDF and nuclear power — before EU “liberalisation” dismantled it. Now critics argue France is paying more for energy, importing expensive foreign gas, and losing sovereignty over its own strategic decisions. The key line: “If tomorrow I was at the head of France, I would make sure our country leaves the European Union.” This is no longer fringe rhetoric. The anti-Brussels backlash is moving into mainstream political debate — driven by soaring energy costs, sanctions fatigue, industrial pressure, and growing anger over national sovereignty. Europe’s political fault lines are widening. Florian Philippot

🚨 FRANCE TURNS AGAINST BRUSSELS A major shift is happening in France. French media figures and political voices are now openly questioning the entire EU energy system — and calling for a return to national control. The arguments are becoming increasingly direct: • Leave the EU energy market • End sanctions on Russia • Restore cheap Russian gas supplies • Expand nuclear power • Stop reliance on costly wind infrastructure • Break Brussels control over French energy policy Florian Philippot says France once had one of the cheapest and most reliable electricity systems in the world through EDF and nuclear power — before EU “liberalisation” dismantled it. Now critics argue France is paying more for energy, importing expensive foreign gas, and losing sovereignty over its own strategic decisions. The key line: “If tomorrow I was at the head of France, I would make sure our country leaves the European Union.” This is no longer fringe rhetoric. The anti-Brussels backlash is moving into mainstream political debate — driven by soaring energy costs, sanctions fatigue, industrial pressure, and growing anger over national sovereignty. Europe’s political fault lines are widening. Florian Philippot

Jim Ferguson

38,266 views • 4 months ago

🇺🇦 Zelensky: At the heart of Russia’s war against Ukraine is the false claim that Ukraine does not exist, that it is supposedly part of Russia. It is not just a matter of history, not just politics or ideology. This is the basis of their goal – to completely wipe Ukraine off the face of the earth. And not just Ukraine. Russia has repeatedly openly stated that it wants to control all its neighbors. It wants to decide what security should be in Europe and whether it should exist at all. Russia has spread its idea of war all the way to Syria and Africa. This is truly a global threat. It is important that many in the world perceive it as such – as a global threat.

🇺🇦 Zelensky: At the heart of Russia’s war against Ukraine is the false claim that Ukraine does not exist, that it is supposedly part of Russia. It is not just a matter of history, not just politics or ideology. This is the basis of their goal – to completely wipe Ukraine off the face of the earth. And not just Ukraine. Russia has repeatedly openly stated that it wants to control all its neighbors. It wants to decide what security should be in Europe and whether it should exist at all. Russia has spread its idea of war all the way to Syria and Africa. This is truly a global threat. It is important that many in the world perceive it as such – as a global threat.

MAKS 25 🇺🇦👀

13,932 views • 5 months ago

The U.S. government has announced that it will no longer fund AUSSOM, and now the Somali government is moving quickly to deploy more troops to fight terrorist groups! Whether this government will succeed or not is a separate question. The point I want people to understand is that relying on foreign troops only delays the transfer of full security responsibility to Somali forces and reduces the urgency to build strong Somali security institutions. The Somali National Army is the only force that can ultimately defeat terrorism in Somalia. African troops or even U.S. airstrikes can't eliminate these groups. At best, they can contain them. That only prolongs the suffering of the Somali people while the United States continues spending billions of dollars on a conflict without a lasting solution. If the U.S. truly considers terrorist groups a threat to its national security or interests, its strategy should be to strengthen and support the Somali government so it can defeat those groups on its own. Cutting funding for AUSSOM and shutting down USAID were among the best decisions made by the current U.S. administration. They create the pressure needed for Somalia to take full responsibility for its own security and institutions.

The U.S. government has announced that it will no longer fund AUSSOM, and now the Somali government is moving quickly to deploy more troops to fight terrorist groups! Whether this government will succeed or not is a separate question. The point I want people to understand is that relying on foreign troops only delays the transfer of full security responsibility to Somali forces and reduces the urgency to build strong Somali security institutions. The Somali National Army is the only force that can ultimately defeat terrorism in Somalia. African troops or even U.S. airstrikes can't eliminate these groups. At best, they can contain them. That only prolongs the suffering of the Somali people while the United States continues spending billions of dollars on a conflict without a lasting solution. If the U.S. truly considers terrorist groups a threat to its national security or interests, its strategy should be to strengthen and support the Somali government so it can defeat those groups on its own. Cutting funding for AUSSOM and shutting down USAID were among the best decisions made by the current U.S. administration. They create the pressure needed for Somalia to take full responsibility for its own security and institutions.

Deeqa 🇸🇴

21,114 views • 2 months ago

👉The Congress Party’s policy on nuclear energy is built on the principle that nuclear energy is too dangerous to be driven by the profit motive. It is critical to India’s national and energy security. 👉The Modi government, through the SHANTI Bill, inverts that logic and seeks to sell what the Indian National Congress built. 👉Through the SHANTI Bill, the BJP government is playing with India’s national and energy security. 👉This government is handing over the fruits of 70 years of publicly funded research and nuclear development—built by successive Congress governments under global sanctions—to private entities. The temples of modern India are being sold to the traders of “New India.” You are allowing 49% FDI in atomic energy production. This primarily benefits U.S. companies. Is this meant as a sweetener ahead of a U.S.–India deal, or is it an attempt to seek validation from President Trump, who imposed a 50% tariff on India and supported Pakistan after Operation Sindoor? Listen to R.Sudha ji as she exposes the dangers of the SHANTI Bill and explains why it must be opposed.

👉The Congress Party’s policy on nuclear energy is built on the principle that nuclear energy is too dangerous to be driven by the profit motive. It is critical to India’s national and energy security. 👉The Modi government, through the SHANTI Bill, inverts that logic and seeks to sell what the Indian National Congress built. 👉Through the SHANTI Bill, the BJP government is playing with India’s national and energy security. 👉This government is handing over the fruits of 70 years of publicly funded research and nuclear development—built by successive Congress governments under global sanctions—to private entities. The temples of modern India are being sold to the traders of “New India.” You are allowing 49% FDI in atomic energy production. This primarily benefits U.S. companies. Is this meant as a sweetener ahead of a U.S.–India deal, or is it an attempt to seek validation from President Trump, who imposed a 50% tariff on India and supported Pakistan after Operation Sindoor? Listen to R.Sudha ji as she exposes the dangers of the SHANTI Bill and explains why it must be opposed.

Congress

17,324 views • 9 months ago

The moka pot has become a symbol of coffee culture, especially for people who enjoy a rich and traditional way of preparing their coffee. Many love the strong flavor and the ritual of making it at home. But the big question is whether it should be called espresso. A moka pot creates a concentrated coffee with pressure, but it is different from the high-pressure extraction used by an espresso machine. Coffee traditions are full of passion and personal preferences. In the end, the best coffee is often the one that brings you the most enjoyment. Do you consider moka pot coffee a type of espresso or its own category?

The moka pot has become a symbol of coffee culture, especially for people who enjoy a rich and traditional way of preparing their coffee. Many love the strong flavor and the ritual of making it at home. But the big question is whether it should be called espresso. A moka pot creates a concentrated coffee with pressure, but it is different from the high-pressure extraction used by an espresso machine. Coffee traditions are full of passion and personal preferences. In the end, the best coffee is often the one that brings you the most enjoyment. Do you consider moka pot coffee a type of espresso or its own category?

Dr. CZ

66,190 views • 3 months ago