Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🇮🇹 Environmental activists led by Greta Thunberg poured dye into Venice's Grand Canal, turning the water bright green. Similar actions carried out in 👉Padua, 👉Prato, 👉Trieste Activists claim they protest Italy's global warming policies — 8 people detained

MyLordBebo's profile picture

Lord Bebo

737,547 subscribers

33,722 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

'Extinction Rebellion' activists pour dye into Venice’s Grand Canal, turning the water bright GREEN and dying the buildings, monuments, and places of historical value green. "They're ruined, said Tomas Valano, we can't get it to come off". Greta Thunberg is banned from Venice — The Telegraph She's not allowed to enter the city and has to pay a fine for pouring dye 🟢into Venice’s Grand Canal.
0:47

'Extinction Rebellion' activists pour dye into Venice’s Grand Canal, turning the water bright GREEN and dying the buildings, monuments, and places of historical value green. "They're ruined, said Tomas Valano, we can't get it to come off". Greta Thunberg is banned from Venice — The Telegraph She's not allowed to enter the city and has to pay a fine for pouring dye 🟢into Venice’s Grand Canal.

Dane

276,972 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🤢 “Eco-activists” from Extinction Rebellion dyed the waters of the Grand Canal in Venice bright green. Greta Thunberg participated in the action under the slogan “Stop Ecocide.” In addition to Venice, similar actions took place in nine major Italian cities.
0:32

🤢 “Eco-activists” from Extinction Rebellion dyed the waters of the Grand Canal in Venice bright green. Greta Thunberg participated in the action under the slogan “Stop Ecocide.” In addition to Venice, similar actions took place in nine major Italian cities.

Lord Bebo

10,918 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Greta Thunberg gets BANNED from Venice after climate activists poured green dye in the Grand Canal in the name of fighting climate change. Dozens of activists including Thunberg received a temporary ban from entering the Italian city after throwing the dye into the water, which risked permanent damage to the UNESCO World Heritage site. Activists from Extinction Rebellion took part in the stunt in the name of tackling climate change and to pressure Italy to have restrictions on fossil fuels. Source: NY Post, Daily Mail Video: Le Parisien
0:21

Greta Thunberg gets BANNED from Venice after climate activists poured green dye in the Grand Canal in the name of fighting climate change. Dozens of activists including Thunberg received a temporary ban from entering the Italian city after throwing the dye into the water, which risked permanent damage to the UNESCO World Heritage site. Activists from Extinction Rebellion took part in the stunt in the name of tackling climate change and to pressure Italy to have restrictions on fossil fuels. Source: NY Post, Daily Mail Video: Le Parisien

Oli London

26,543 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🇮🇹 VENICE TO GRETA: THANKS FOR THE GREEN WATER, NOW GET OUT Greta and her Extinction Rebellion crew poured green dye into Venice’s Grand Canal to protest climate inaction. They called the dye-filled canal protest a form of climate activism, but Italian officials labeled it vandalism and UNESCO raised concerns about potential damage to the historic site. Dressed in red cloaks and veils, they also staged flash mobs and hung “Stop Ecocide” banners from the Rialto Bridge. Venice gave them a 48-hour ban and a $172 fine. The dye, they insist, was harmless. The city, less convinced. Source: NY Post, Visegrád 24
0:38

🇮🇹 VENICE TO GRETA: THANKS FOR THE GREEN WATER, NOW GET OUT Greta and her Extinction Rebellion crew poured green dye into Venice’s Grand Canal to protest climate inaction. They called the dye-filled canal protest a form of climate activism, but Italian officials labeled it vandalism and UNESCO raised concerns about potential damage to the historic site. Dressed in red cloaks and veils, they also staged flash mobs and hung “Stop Ecocide” banners from the Rialto Bridge. Venice gave them a 48-hour ban and a $172 fine. The dye, they insist, was harmless. The city, less convinced. Source: NY Post, Visegrád 24

Mario Nawfal

2,411,076 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Greta Thunberg has set sail for Gaza for the second time. The 22-year-old and other activists are attempting to deliver aid to Gaza, despite having been detained by Israeli forces when they approached in June. Report by Siobhán Robbins Sky. Gaza news👉
2:46

Greta Thunberg has set sail for Gaza for the second time. The 22-year-old and other activists are attempting to deliver aid to Gaza, despite having been detained by Israeli forces when they approached in June. Report by Siobhán Robbins Sky. Gaza news👉

Sky News

47,459 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🇵🇰 Pakistanification of America: Why Are We Celebrating a Terror State in Chicago? Why? Chicago was drowning in green & white. Floats, drums, and flags for Pakistan — a nuclear-armed, jihad-exporting, blasphemy-enforcing state. This is the same Pakistan that: 👉 Hid Osama bin Laden 👉 Funds global jihad 👉Trains and arms the Taliban and other terror groups Jails & kills Christians, Hindus, Ahmadis, and dissenting Muslims for “blasphemy” 👉 Kidnaps young non-Muslim girls from their families, forces them into Islam and marries them off to old men 👉 Systematically wipes out Hindu and Christian villages through mob violence and land seizures 👉 Burns churches and temples while police look the other way 👉 Runs madrassas that churn out suicide bombers and militant clerics 👉 Teaches schoolchildren to glorify martyrdom and dream of a global Islamic caliphate 👉 Sends its political operatives and Islamic activists to embed themselves in Western politics 👉 Harbors terrorist fugitives while demanding U.S. aid 👉 Persecutes journalists who expose corruption or Islamic violence 👉Uses its intelligence service (ISI) to spread jihadist ideology abroad And yet, they parade their flag in our streets while Americans who speak out against Islamic extremism get smeared or silenced. America First means Pakistan LAST. Cut the aid. Cut the visas. Cut the lies.
2:16

🇵🇰 Pakistanification of America: Why Are We Celebrating a Terror State in Chicago? Why? Chicago was drowning in green & white. Floats, drums, and flags for Pakistan — a nuclear-armed, jihad-exporting, blasphemy-enforcing state. This is the same Pakistan that: 👉 Hid Osama bin Laden 👉 Funds global jihad 👉Trains and arms the Taliban and other terror groups Jails & kills Christians, Hindus, Ahmadis, and dissenting Muslims for “blasphemy” 👉 Kidnaps young non-Muslim girls from their families, forces them into Islam and marries them off to old men 👉 Systematically wipes out Hindu and Christian villages through mob violence and land seizures 👉 Burns churches and temples while police look the other way 👉 Runs madrassas that churn out suicide bombers and militant clerics 👉 Teaches schoolchildren to glorify martyrdom and dream of a global Islamic caliphate 👉 Sends its political operatives and Islamic activists to embed themselves in Western politics 👉 Harbors terrorist fugitives while demanding U.S. aid 👉 Persecutes journalists who expose corruption or Islamic violence 👉Uses its intelligence service (ISI) to spread jihadist ideology abroad And yet, they parade their flag in our streets while Americans who speak out against Islamic extremism get smeared or silenced. America First means Pakistan LAST. Cut the aid. Cut the visas. Cut the lies.

Amy Mek

39,645 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

So many people—myself included—are drawn to the climate movement because they want to help people. They care, want to help the poor, and save the planet. But what they don't understand is that the climate movement is doing the exact opposite of what these well-meaning activists want to accomplish. The movement vilifies reliable energy—the single biggest driver of getting people out of poverty. Over the past several decades, we’ve spent trillions on an energy transition away from fossil fuels. The result? We’ve made our energy system less reliable and more expensive. Western countries have also practiced climate colonialism by preventing Africa from developing with natural gas, coal, and oil. (This goes against everything climate activists claim to stand for!) This is the most morally inverted movement ever. Right now, a billion people don't have access to reliable energy. That means women are spending their entire day figuring out how to get fuel to cook their food. Children in these settings are not going to school, they’re spending hours collecting wood or walking to get water. All of that is a symptom of energy poverty. This is when climate activists will say “but the planet is burning!” Just no. The planet is not burning. Yes, we've added CO2 to the atmosphere and seen about ~1°C of warming over 150 years. But 95% of CO2 is naturally occurring and historically, warming periods are when humans flourish. The Medieval Warm Period (900–1300 AD) is a great example. It was 0.7-1°C warmer and populations boomed. They then collapsed during the Little Ice Age. Takeaway the climate hysteria and objectively you would choose to live during a warming period over a cooling period. The rest of the data is reassuring: ✅Globally hurricanes rates are slightly declining ✅Tornadoes are down ✅Sea level rise is a manageable ~3mm/year ✅Global greening is up 15–40% since the 1980s ✅10x people still die from cold than from heat In the West the first time students hear about our energy system is within the context of “fossil fuels are burning the planet.” They’re never taught that it’s an amazing technology that has lifted billions out of poverty. I considered this a huge injustice. We need to pivot away from climate hysteria toward one goal: ending energy poverty and expanding access to energy. If you’re still gripped by climate fear and anxiety, I’m sorry you are a victim of this fear narrative. But it's time to get out.
5:50

So many people—myself included—are drawn to the climate movement because they want to help people. They care, want to help the poor, and save the planet. But what they don't understand is that the climate movement is doing the exact opposite of what these well-meaning activists want to accomplish. The movement vilifies reliable energy—the single biggest driver of getting people out of poverty. Over the past several decades, we’ve spent trillions on an energy transition away from fossil fuels. The result? We’ve made our energy system less reliable and more expensive. Western countries have also practiced climate colonialism by preventing Africa from developing with natural gas, coal, and oil. (This goes against everything climate activists claim to stand for!) This is the most morally inverted movement ever. Right now, a billion people don't have access to reliable energy. That means women are spending their entire day figuring out how to get fuel to cook their food. Children in these settings are not going to school, they’re spending hours collecting wood or walking to get water. All of that is a symptom of energy poverty. This is when climate activists will say “but the planet is burning!” Just no. The planet is not burning. Yes, we've added CO2 to the atmosphere and seen about ~1°C of warming over 150 years. But 95% of CO2 is naturally occurring and historically, warming periods are when humans flourish. The Medieval Warm Period (900–1300 AD) is a great example. It was 0.7-1°C warmer and populations boomed. They then collapsed during the Little Ice Age. Takeaway the climate hysteria and objectively you would choose to live during a warming period over a cooling period. The rest of the data is reassuring: ✅Globally hurricanes rates are slightly declining ✅Tornadoes are down ✅Sea level rise is a manageable ~3mm/year ✅Global greening is up 15–40% since the 1980s ✅10x people still die from cold than from heat In the West the first time students hear about our energy system is within the context of “fossil fuels are burning the planet.” They’re never taught that it’s an amazing technology that has lifted billions out of poverty. I considered this a huge injustice. We need to pivot away from climate hysteria toward one goal: ending energy poverty and expanding access to energy. If you’re still gripped by climate fear and anxiety, I’m sorry you are a victim of this fear narrative. But it's time to get out.

Lucy Biggers

31,322 Aufrufe • vor 21 Tagen

🫧QUIET NEWS. The DEI era masquerading as Intelligence Is OVER. For over a decade, the CIA blazed through taxpayer dollars while national security emphasis was on Democrats woke bias versus real threats. Under Dir. John Ratcliffe’s leadership, the CIA just retracted or gutted 19 bogus intelligence reports loaded with systemic leftist bias. The reports were deliberate radical activist inserts, slipped into our intel pipeline. Here’s a peek at the three declassified (redacted versions out for all to see): 👉Frenzy over LGBT activists in the Middle East as some grand strategic crisis 👉Smearing traditional family values and “white violent extremism” (code for painting conservative men/women/mothers/fathers as radicals) 👉Linking COVID-era contraception shortages in poor countries to global planet and economic doom The DEI poison spanned Obama, Trump 1.0, and Joe years, proving the fat cat bureaucratic rot was deeply rooted and systemic. The same crew that pushed the Russia-Russia hoax and ignored real enemies like China now gets exposed for turning spy work into social justice pamphlets. Ratcliffe isn’t playing: “There is absolutely no room for bias in our work.” The President’s Intelligence Advisory Board reviewed hundreds, flagged these 19 for failing basic impartiality and tradecraft. 17 fully yanked, 2 heavily revised. Analyst training is being overhauled. Sen. Tom Cotton was spot-on: ‘We’ve missed real dangers while bureaucrats obsessed over “pandemic contraceptive shortfalls.” Those days are over. The swamp’s favorite politicized “intelligence”—just got defanged. Transparency. Objectivity. America First priorities are being restored. 🇺🇸 Source: .Just the News #DEIisDead #CIACleanup #AmericaFirst
4:13

🫧QUIET NEWS. The DEI era masquerading as Intelligence Is OVER. For over a decade, the CIA blazed through taxpayer dollars while national security emphasis was on Democrats woke bias versus real threats. Under Dir. John Ratcliffe’s leadership, the CIA just retracted or gutted 19 bogus intelligence reports loaded with systemic leftist bias. The reports were deliberate radical activist inserts, slipped into our intel pipeline. Here’s a peek at the three declassified (redacted versions out for all to see): 👉Frenzy over LGBT activists in the Middle East as some grand strategic crisis 👉Smearing traditional family values and “white violent extremism” (code for painting conservative men/women/mothers/fathers as radicals) 👉Linking COVID-era contraception shortages in poor countries to global planet and economic doom The DEI poison spanned Obama, Trump 1.0, and Joe years, proving the fat cat bureaucratic rot was deeply rooted and systemic. The same crew that pushed the Russia-Russia hoax and ignored real enemies like China now gets exposed for turning spy work into social justice pamphlets. Ratcliffe isn’t playing: “There is absolutely no room for bias in our work.” The President’s Intelligence Advisory Board reviewed hundreds, flagged these 19 for failing basic impartiality and tradecraft. 17 fully yanked, 2 heavily revised. Analyst training is being overhauled. Sen. Tom Cotton was spot-on: ‘We’ve missed real dangers while bureaucrats obsessed over “pandemic contraceptive shortfalls.” Those days are over. The swamp’s favorite politicized “intelligence”—just got defanged. Transparency. Objectivity. America First priorities are being restored. 🇺🇸 Source: .Just the News #DEIisDead #CIACleanup #AmericaFirst

Tosca Austen

13,868 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Today was a hard day for us. It began at the Tbilisi City Court, where nine political prisoners were sentenced. One, Anton Chechini, received 8 years and 6 months. The other eight received either 2 years or 2 years and 6 months. As if that weren’t enough, regime police attacked supporters of the political prisoners inside the court. That was our horrible morning, gifted by the regime. It didn’t end there. After court, Tea Tsulukiani and her illegitimate commission again blamed Georgia for starting the 2008 war and for “bombing our own people.” This has been Georgian Dream’s rhetoric since 2012, and now they are saying it officially. It’s clear this will be used to arrest more people on criminal charges, just as they did at the beginning of this illegitimate commission. Naturally, pro-European protesters gathered at the Parliament to oppose everything Georgian Dream is doing to destroy Georgia’s future. The regime’s response was brutal. To hide the political prisoners’ hearings and the commission’s result, they launched terror and violence against peaceful protesters. First came a siege: police kettled us and tried to stop all movement. Protesters managed to break the siege and, in response, blocked Rustaveli Avenue, something we have done for more than 278 days, and again today, on day 279 of protest. The violence continued: police pursued people and carried out violent arrests. 23 activists were detained, including students. During this period, the regime also targeted the Iliauni Students Movement (ERA) High-ranking officials issued attacks and abusive statements against movement's members, and even went after Germany’s ambassador to Georgia, Peter Fischer (Peter Fischer) The protest continues. Groups are marching and blocking roads. We still don’t know where the detained protesters have been taken or how they are doing. Down with the pro-Russian regime. Freedom for all political prisoners ✊
0:13

Today was a hard day for us. It began at the Tbilisi City Court, where nine political prisoners were sentenced. One, Anton Chechini, received 8 years and 6 months. The other eight received either 2 years or 2 years and 6 months. As if that weren’t enough, regime police attacked supporters of the political prisoners inside the court. That was our horrible morning, gifted by the regime. It didn’t end there. After court, Tea Tsulukiani and her illegitimate commission again blamed Georgia for starting the 2008 war and for “bombing our own people.” This has been Georgian Dream’s rhetoric since 2012, and now they are saying it officially. It’s clear this will be used to arrest more people on criminal charges, just as they did at the beginning of this illegitimate commission. Naturally, pro-European protesters gathered at the Parliament to oppose everything Georgian Dream is doing to destroy Georgia’s future. The regime’s response was brutal. To hide the political prisoners’ hearings and the commission’s result, they launched terror and violence against peaceful protesters. First came a siege: police kettled us and tried to stop all movement. Protesters managed to break the siege and, in response, blocked Rustaveli Avenue, something we have done for more than 278 days, and again today, on day 279 of protest. The violence continued: police pursued people and carried out violent arrests. 23 activists were detained, including students. During this period, the regime also targeted the Iliauni Students Movement (ERA) High-ranking officials issued attacks and abusive statements against movement's members, and even went after Germany’s ambassador to Georgia, Peter Fischer (Peter Fischer) The protest continues. Groups are marching and blocking roads. We still don’t know where the detained protesters have been taken or how they are doing. Down with the pro-Russian regime. Freedom for all political prisoners ✊

Luka Mishveladze 🇬🇪

27,214 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Palestine Action Activists Who Vandalised British Arms Factory and Injured Police Officer With Sledgehammer Are Jailed. Four Palestine Action activists known as the Filton Four were sentenced today at Woolwich Crown Court for their involvement in a destructive raid on an Israeli defence company’s factory in Filton, near Bristol. The group, which included an activist who struck a female police officer with a sledgehammer, causing a spinal fracture, drove a van through the perimeter fence and caused more than £1 million worth of damage to equipment. In a significant ruling, the judge applied a terrorism connection to their sentences, a first for this type of protest case even though they were not charged under terrorism laws. This reflects the court’s view that the action was intended to influence government policy through serious criminal damage. Samuel Corner, 23, was jailed for 8 years and 8 months. Charlotte Head, 30, and Leona Kamio, 30, each received 6 years. Fatema Zainab Rajwani, 21, was sentenced to 5 years and 8 months. Footage from the incident on 6 August 2024 showed the masked group dressed in red boiler suits using hammers and crowbars to smash drones, computers and other equipment inside the Elbit Systems site. Corner was convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm on Sergeant Kate Evans after striking her with a sledgehammer twice during clashes with police. He was cleared of the more serious charge of GBH with intent. Mr Justice Jeremy Johnson ruled that the offence had a terrorism connection because it was designed to intimidate the government and disrupt operations linked to what the activists called British complicity in Gaza. The defendants knew Palestine Action’s goal was to shut down the Elbit site. As a result of the terrorism uplift, the four will serve at least two-thirds of their sentences in custody and face strict post-release monitoring requirements, similar to those for terrorism offenders. Outside the court, police arrested 72 people protesting in support of the group and the now-proscribed Palestine Action organisation. Many were waving Palestinian flags and displaying signs backing the banned group. The government has so far remained silent on the mass arrests. Amnesty International and various campaigners, have described the sentences as disproportionate and an attack on protest rights. More than 100 public figures had urged the judge not to apply the terrorism connection. The activists had already spent significant time on remand. Their first trial saw them cleared of aggravated burglary, but a retrial led to convictions on the criminal damage charges. The proscription of Palestine Action last year has heightened the stakes around such actions. While many support peaceful protest, today’s sentences underline the serious legal consequences of crossing into violence and large-scale criminal damage. #UKNews #CrimeNews #Bristol #Filton
3:40

Palestine Action Activists Who Vandalised British Arms Factory and Injured Police Officer With Sledgehammer Are Jailed. Four Palestine Action activists known as the Filton Four were sentenced today at Woolwich Crown Court for their involvement in a destructive raid on an Israeli defence company’s factory in Filton, near Bristol. The group, which included an activist who struck a female police officer with a sledgehammer, causing a spinal fracture, drove a van through the perimeter fence and caused more than £1 million worth of damage to equipment. In a significant ruling, the judge applied a terrorism connection to their sentences, a first for this type of protest case even though they were not charged under terrorism laws. This reflects the court’s view that the action was intended to influence government policy through serious criminal damage. Samuel Corner, 23, was jailed for 8 years and 8 months. Charlotte Head, 30, and Leona Kamio, 30, each received 6 years. Fatema Zainab Rajwani, 21, was sentenced to 5 years and 8 months. Footage from the incident on 6 August 2024 showed the masked group dressed in red boiler suits using hammers and crowbars to smash drones, computers and other equipment inside the Elbit Systems site. Corner was convicted of inflicting grievous bodily harm on Sergeant Kate Evans after striking her with a sledgehammer twice during clashes with police. He was cleared of the more serious charge of GBH with intent. Mr Justice Jeremy Johnson ruled that the offence had a terrorism connection because it was designed to intimidate the government and disrupt operations linked to what the activists called British complicity in Gaza. The defendants knew Palestine Action’s goal was to shut down the Elbit site. As a result of the terrorism uplift, the four will serve at least two-thirds of their sentences in custody and face strict post-release monitoring requirements, similar to those for terrorism offenders. Outside the court, police arrested 72 people protesting in support of the group and the now-proscribed Palestine Action organisation. Many were waving Palestinian flags and displaying signs backing the banned group. The government has so far remained silent on the mass arrests. Amnesty International and various campaigners, have described the sentences as disproportionate and an attack on protest rights. More than 100 public figures had urged the judge not to apply the terrorism connection. The activists had already spent significant time on remand. Their first trial saw them cleared of aggravated burglary, but a retrial led to convictions on the criminal damage charges. The proscription of Palestine Action last year has heightened the stakes around such actions. While many support peaceful protest, today’s sentences underline the serious legal consequences of crossing into violence and large-scale criminal damage. #UKNews #CrimeNews #Bristol #Filton

BritMatters 🇬🇧

17,101 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

let’s start where this actually lives, not where you want it to live. with the math. the last three weeks of dynamite: 👉 765k 👉 730k 👉 654k that is not a ramp. that is not momentum. that is not “heating up” into a conversion window. that is a decline into it. you are looking at a -111k drop in two weeks, roughly 14–15% contraction from the high to the low, at the exact point where a traditional ppv cycle should be stabilizing or expanding. instead, you have compression. average those three weeks and you land at roughly ~716k linear viewers. that is your real, observable, measurable audience. not hypothetical reach not cumulative impressions not social engagement proxies actual people sitting down and watching the show in the time slot that matters for conversion. i’ve already laid out in detail what the max numbers actually represent and how simulcast behavior works, so i’m not going to re-litigate all of that here. but it matters enough to say again clearly: max is not a second audience at scale. it is a distribution extension that splits the same audience. it does not double your reach. it does not materially expand your funnel. it shifts a portion of existing behavior from one pipe to another. the short version is already established: 👉 max is not additive at scale 👉 max is a split of the same audience 👉 max realistically contributes ~50k–150k, ~75k center so your total reachable audience on a good night is: 👉 ~790k–800k all-in that’s the funnel. that’s the ceiling. that’s the number you are working from. that’s the universe that can possibly convert into a paid transaction. not hypothetical not inflated not “what if” that is the real audience number. now take the number dave is floating: 👉 ~143k ppv buys run the only equation that matters: 👉 143k ÷ 800k = ~17.9% conversion stop there for a second Dave Meltzer is unironically asserting that nearly 1 out of every 5 viewers is converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026 in a market with: – no centralized ppv infrastructure – subscription-first behavior – widespread piracy – fragmented pricing (domestic, max discount, vpn international) – a declining weekly audience trend that is the claim. not “strong performance.” not “better than expected.” not “up year over year.” the claim is nearly 1 in 5 viewers converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026. this is where the conversation should end, because that number does not exist anywhere in modern media behavior. it doesn’t exist in boxing. it doesn’t exist in ufc. it doesn’t exist in any scaled transactional model operating in the current environment. and more importantly, it didn’t exist consistently even when the infrastructure supporting it was intact. again, this is the part people either don’t understand or choose to ignore: ppv is not just a pricing model. it is an infrastructure model. and that infrastructure is gone. for decades, the backbone of ppv was inDemand. that system wasn’t just pushing content out to cable homes. it was aggregating buys, standardizing reporting, and creating a reconciliation layer that allowed promoters, distributors, and networks to operate off the same dataset. if you were serious about this business, you could triangulate numbers. you could get within a narrow band of reality because the pipes were real and the accounting was shared. that system shut down in 2025. 👉 143k ppv buys is not an aggressive take 👉 it is not an optimistic take 👉 it is a structurally impossible take because we know what real conversion looks like. we do not need to guess. it has been modeled across combat sports, boxing, ufc, and multiple transactional platforms. the ranges are stable: 👉 1–3% → normal 👉 3–5% → strong 👉 5%+ → elite and rare, reserved for events with massive cultural heat and crossover appeal those ranges were established when the infrastructure was intact, pricing was more controlled, piracy was less frictionless, and distribution was more centralized. today, every one of those conditions is worse. pricing is fragmented. you have $49.99 standard, $39.99 through max, international pricing accessible through vpn, and a piracy environment where high-quality streams are available instantly. that is a high-friction, high-leakage system. so conversion should compress, not expand. now apply real-world conversion to your real audience: 👉 800k × 2% = 16k buys 👉 800k × 3% = 24k buys 👉 800k × 5% = 40k buys that’s your range. 👉 ~15k–35k realistic 👉 ~20k–30k as the most defensible center 👉 ~40k reasonable given the strength of the headliners now invert the math, because this is where the claim completely collapses. if you want to justify 143k buys at even a healthy 3% conversion rate, you need roughly 4.7 million engaged viewers. so the question becomes extremely simple: where are the other four million people? 👉they are not on linear television. 👉they are not on max. 👉they are not showing up in any digital engagement metrics that correlate with that level of demand. 👉they are not visible anywhere in the ecosystem that would need to exist to support that level of conversion. 👉👉👉👉👉 they do not exist. and this is before you even account for the trend line moving the wrong way. you are not converting off a growing base. you are converting off a shrinking one. you are not building urgency. you are losing reach. that matters, because conversion does not happen in a vacuum. it happens on top of momentum, visibility, and audience expansion. when those inputs are declining, conversion does not spike to historic highs. it compresses further. the biggest fights in the world are no longer relying on ppv as their primary distribution model. they are moving to platforms that guarantee reach and revenue up front. the most recent example should end this conversation for anyone actually paying attention: netflix just locked tyson fury vs anthony joshua for a major global fight this august. that is one of the biggest possible matchups in boxing. in any previous era, that is a premium ppv event with massive buy expectations, heavy marketing, and a full transactional rollout. instead, it is going to a subscription platform. why? because the economics are better. the reach is global. the friction is lower. the platform values engagement at scale over one-off purchases. that is where the industry is. so when you are being asked to believe that a weekly wrestling property with a ~700k linear audience, declining into its ppv window, is somehow generating six-figure transactional buys inside a subscription platform in 2026, you are not just being asked to accept a number. dave is asking you to ignore the direction of the entire market. and that’s before you even bring in platform behavior. max is not a live sports-first platform. it does not behave like one. when max has something it cares about, it promotes it aggressively. homepage rails. push notifications. press releases. talent integration. cross-platform amplification. you do not see that here. and that absence is not accidental. platforms surface what they want you to see. they amplify what drives engagement and revenue. if ppv at scale were happening inside that ecosystem, it would be visible. it would be part of the narrative. it would be monetized loudly. it isn’t. and that’s before you even factor in the other variables i’ve broken down in detail before: 👉 i’ve already debunked why the max numbers people are throwing around don’t make sense 👉 i’ve already explained what the linear number actually represents and what it doesn’t 👉 i’ve already mapped the media rights landscape in 2026, including how these properties are being evaluated ahead of the paramount–wbd merger the wsj reports could close as early as july so when you’re being told by dave that a property with a ~700k weekly audience trending downward into a ppv window is generating six-figure transactional buys at premium pricing inside a subscription platform in 2026, you’re not being given data. you’re being given a number that does not reconcile with anything else in the system. that’s math. stop it - 45
1:00

let’s start where this actually lives, not where you want it to live. with the math. the last three weeks of dynamite: 👉 765k 👉 730k 👉 654k that is not a ramp. that is not momentum. that is not “heating up” into a conversion window. that is a decline into it. you are looking at a -111k drop in two weeks, roughly 14–15% contraction from the high to the low, at the exact point where a traditional ppv cycle should be stabilizing or expanding. instead, you have compression. average those three weeks and you land at roughly ~716k linear viewers. that is your real, observable, measurable audience. not hypothetical reach not cumulative impressions not social engagement proxies actual people sitting down and watching the show in the time slot that matters for conversion. i’ve already laid out in detail what the max numbers actually represent and how simulcast behavior works, so i’m not going to re-litigate all of that here. but it matters enough to say again clearly: max is not a second audience at scale. it is a distribution extension that splits the same audience. it does not double your reach. it does not materially expand your funnel. it shifts a portion of existing behavior from one pipe to another. the short version is already established: 👉 max is not additive at scale 👉 max is a split of the same audience 👉 max realistically contributes ~50k–150k, ~75k center so your total reachable audience on a good night is: 👉 ~790k–800k all-in that’s the funnel. that’s the ceiling. that’s the number you are working from. that’s the universe that can possibly convert into a paid transaction. not hypothetical not inflated not “what if” that is the real audience number. now take the number dave is floating: 👉 ~143k ppv buys run the only equation that matters: 👉 143k ÷ 800k = ~17.9% conversion stop there for a second Dave Meltzer is unironically asserting that nearly 1 out of every 5 viewers is converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026 in a market with: – no centralized ppv infrastructure – subscription-first behavior – widespread piracy – fragmented pricing (domestic, max discount, vpn international) – a declining weekly audience trend that is the claim. not “strong performance.” not “better than expected.” not “up year over year.” the claim is nearly 1 in 5 viewers converting into a $40–$50 transaction in 2026. this is where the conversation should end, because that number does not exist anywhere in modern media behavior. it doesn’t exist in boxing. it doesn’t exist in ufc. it doesn’t exist in any scaled transactional model operating in the current environment. and more importantly, it didn’t exist consistently even when the infrastructure supporting it was intact. again, this is the part people either don’t understand or choose to ignore: ppv is not just a pricing model. it is an infrastructure model. and that infrastructure is gone. for decades, the backbone of ppv was inDemand. that system wasn’t just pushing content out to cable homes. it was aggregating buys, standardizing reporting, and creating a reconciliation layer that allowed promoters, distributors, and networks to operate off the same dataset. if you were serious about this business, you could triangulate numbers. you could get within a narrow band of reality because the pipes were real and the accounting was shared. that system shut down in 2025. 👉 143k ppv buys is not an aggressive take 👉 it is not an optimistic take 👉 it is a structurally impossible take because we know what real conversion looks like. we do not need to guess. it has been modeled across combat sports, boxing, ufc, and multiple transactional platforms. the ranges are stable: 👉 1–3% → normal 👉 3–5% → strong 👉 5%+ → elite and rare, reserved for events with massive cultural heat and crossover appeal those ranges were established when the infrastructure was intact, pricing was more controlled, piracy was less frictionless, and distribution was more centralized. today, every one of those conditions is worse. pricing is fragmented. you have $49.99 standard, $39.99 through max, international pricing accessible through vpn, and a piracy environment where high-quality streams are available instantly. that is a high-friction, high-leakage system. so conversion should compress, not expand. now apply real-world conversion to your real audience: 👉 800k × 2% = 16k buys 👉 800k × 3% = 24k buys 👉 800k × 5% = 40k buys that’s your range. 👉 ~15k–35k realistic 👉 ~20k–30k as the most defensible center 👉 ~40k reasonable given the strength of the headliners now invert the math, because this is where the claim completely collapses. if you want to justify 143k buys at even a healthy 3% conversion rate, you need roughly 4.7 million engaged viewers. so the question becomes extremely simple: where are the other four million people? 👉they are not on linear television. 👉they are not on max. 👉they are not showing up in any digital engagement metrics that correlate with that level of demand. 👉they are not visible anywhere in the ecosystem that would need to exist to support that level of conversion. 👉👉👉👉👉 they do not exist. and this is before you even account for the trend line moving the wrong way. you are not converting off a growing base. you are converting off a shrinking one. you are not building urgency. you are losing reach. that matters, because conversion does not happen in a vacuum. it happens on top of momentum, visibility, and audience expansion. when those inputs are declining, conversion does not spike to historic highs. it compresses further. the biggest fights in the world are no longer relying on ppv as their primary distribution model. they are moving to platforms that guarantee reach and revenue up front. the most recent example should end this conversation for anyone actually paying attention: netflix just locked tyson fury vs anthony joshua for a major global fight this august. that is one of the biggest possible matchups in boxing. in any previous era, that is a premium ppv event with massive buy expectations, heavy marketing, and a full transactional rollout. instead, it is going to a subscription platform. why? because the economics are better. the reach is global. the friction is lower. the platform values engagement at scale over one-off purchases. that is where the industry is. so when you are being asked to believe that a weekly wrestling property with a ~700k linear audience, declining into its ppv window, is somehow generating six-figure transactional buys inside a subscription platform in 2026, you are not just being asked to accept a number. dave is asking you to ignore the direction of the entire market. and that’s before you even bring in platform behavior. max is not a live sports-first platform. it does not behave like one. when max has something it cares about, it promotes it aggressively. homepage rails. push notifications. press releases. talent integration. cross-platform amplification. you do not see that here. and that absence is not accidental. platforms surface what they want you to see. they amplify what drives engagement and revenue. if ppv at scale were happening inside that ecosystem, it would be visible. it would be part of the narrative. it would be monetized loudly. it isn’t. and that’s before you even factor in the other variables i’ve broken down in detail before: 👉 i’ve already debunked why the max numbers people are throwing around don’t make sense 👉 i’ve already explained what the linear number actually represents and what it doesn’t 👉 i’ve already mapped the media rights landscape in 2026, including how these properties are being evaluated ahead of the paramount–wbd merger the wsj reports could close as early as july so when you’re being told by dave that a property with a ~700k weekly audience trending downward into a ppv window is generating six-figure transactional buys at premium pricing inside a subscription platform in 2026, you’re not being given data. you’re being given a number that does not reconcile with anything else in the system. that’s math. stop it - 45

Nick LoPiccolo

20,695 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨 EXTREMELY URGENT APPEAL FOR GAZA 🚨 Childhood is being erased—slowly and painfully. A child searched desperately for a single drop of water… and found none. Water is running out. Children are dying of thirst. In Gaza, thirst is no longer a future risk. It is a deadly reality. Small, fragile bodies. Cracked lips. Outstretched hands asking for nothing but a sip of water. Not food. Not medicine. Just water 💧 This week, in a rare moment of courage amid global silence, three people chose to stand up when so many looked away: 🔥 Felix (GoliathFan1952) ✨ William Menaker (Will 🦥 Menaker) 🤍 Eyup Lovely (Eyup Lovely) They spoke when voices were suppressed. They acted when others hesitated. And because of them, clean drinking water reached children and families who were being slowly killed by dehydration. In Gaza, a cup of water is no longer a basic human right 💧 It is the difference between a child surviving and a child being carried lifeless. Between a mother holding her children alive… or saying goodbye in silence. What you did was not a simple donation. It was life-saving action. Your voices helped break through the siege, your support opened a path to survival, and your stance became a barrier against death by thirst. While the world turned away, you proved that humanity still resists 🤍 This is not an ordinary thank-you—it is recognition of lives saved. 🚨 TIME IS RUNNING OUT 🚨 Every hour without water puts another child at risk. 👉 Donate now. Not tomorrow. 💧 Because water in Gaza = life If water arrives today, a child survives the night. If it doesn’t— There may be no morning.
1:25

🚨 EXTREMELY URGENT APPEAL FOR GAZA 🚨 Childhood is being erased—slowly and painfully. A child searched desperately for a single drop of water… and found none. Water is running out. Children are dying of thirst. In Gaza, thirst is no longer a future risk. It is a deadly reality. Small, fragile bodies. Cracked lips. Outstretched hands asking for nothing but a sip of water. Not food. Not medicine. Just water 💧 This week, in a rare moment of courage amid global silence, three people chose to stand up when so many looked away: 🔥 Felix (GoliathFan1952) ✨ William Menaker (Will 🦥 Menaker) 🤍 Eyup Lovely (Eyup Lovely) They spoke when voices were suppressed. They acted when others hesitated. And because of them, clean drinking water reached children and families who were being slowly killed by dehydration. In Gaza, a cup of water is no longer a basic human right 💧 It is the difference between a child surviving and a child being carried lifeless. Between a mother holding her children alive… or saying goodbye in silence. What you did was not a simple donation. It was life-saving action. Your voices helped break through the siege, your support opened a path to survival, and your stance became a barrier against death by thirst. While the world turned away, you proved that humanity still resists 🤍 This is not an ordinary thank-you—it is recognition of lives saved. 🚨 TIME IS RUNNING OUT 🚨 Every hour without water puts another child at risk. 👉 Donate now. Not tomorrow. 💧 Because water in Gaza = life If water arrives today, a child survives the night. If it doesn’t— There may be no morning.

Muhmmed Project𓂆 🇵🇸

133,368 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

President Trump just summed up the hypocrisy of modern Democrats in one brutal line by pointing out how the same people screaming “Jim Crow 2.0” about voter laws in mostly red southern states stay completely silent about heavily white, overwhelmingly blue New England states running elections under systems that are often even stricter. That’s why this hit so hard online. Trump exposed what millions of Americans already believe: for the political establishment, the outrage is never really about “democracy.” It’s about power and control. For years Democrats and media activists tried painting southern states as evil or racist anytime they passed voter ID laws, tightened ballot rules, or changed election procedures, while conveniently ignoring similar policies in deep blue states because those states vote the “correct” way politically. Trump’s point landed because it cut straight through the selective outrage and double standards people are exhausted from hearing every election cycle. The reason reactions exploded is because Americans are getting tired of being lectured by elites who apply completely different standards depending on who controls a state. One side gets branded dangerous and anti democracy for wanting election security, while the other side gets praised as defenders of democracy doing many of the same things. Trump has always been effective at taking complicated political hypocrisy and turning it into one sharp line regular people instantly understand, and this was another example of exactly that. 🤡
0:26

President Trump just summed up the hypocrisy of modern Democrats in one brutal line by pointing out how the same people screaming “Jim Crow 2.0” about voter laws in mostly red southern states stay completely silent about heavily white, overwhelmingly blue New England states running elections under systems that are often even stricter. That’s why this hit so hard online. Trump exposed what millions of Americans already believe: for the political establishment, the outrage is never really about “democracy.” It’s about power and control. For years Democrats and media activists tried painting southern states as evil or racist anytime they passed voter ID laws, tightened ballot rules, or changed election procedures, while conveniently ignoring similar policies in deep blue states because those states vote the “correct” way politically. Trump’s point landed because it cut straight through the selective outrage and double standards people are exhausted from hearing every election cycle. The reason reactions exploded is because Americans are getting tired of being lectured by elites who apply completely different standards depending on who controls a state. One side gets branded dangerous and anti democracy for wanting election security, while the other side gets praised as defenders of democracy doing many of the same things. Trump has always been effective at taking complicated political hypocrisy and turning it into one sharp line regular people instantly understand, and this was another example of exactly that. 🤡

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

20,799 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

“There’s a doomsday view of climate change,” said Bill Gates on Tuesday. “Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong….People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future. Emissions projections have gone down, and with the right policies and investments, innovation will allow us to drive emissions down much further.” In truth, Gates significantly understates just how wrong the doomsday problem is, says one of the world’s most influential climate scientists. “The weakest part of the argument has always been that warming is dangerous,” says Judy Curry, professor emerita at Georgia Tech University, in a new podcast with me. “It isn’t really. More people die from the cold than the heat. So this is probably a net benefit globally. Where’s the danger here?” Some climate scientists say Curry is a global warming denier, hasn’t done the research that they have done, and participated in a Trump administration misinformation effort. But Curry recognizes that the Earth is warming and that humans are contributing. Curry points out that “the modern warming started in the mid-19th century, somewhere between 1820 and 1860, following the end of the Little Ice Age. We’ve been warming since then. Nothing particularly surprising or unusual in my opinion. Is increasing CO₂ contributing to that? Yes.” The fact that warming has been beneficial “doesn’t mean that we should ignore the problem” she stresses and “doesn’t mean that we should keep pouring junk into the atmosphere. And Curry’s qualifications are exemplary. She frequently testifies before Congress and was one of five American scientists who conducted an independent review of climate science for the Department of Energy. And has done significantly more climate research than many of her critics. “I’m the one who’s done more climate dynamics research,” she noted. In truth, scientists have for decades been exaggerating the human impact compared to what nature does. When asked what percentage of the warming she would ascribe to humans, Curry said, “I would say I wouldn’t go much more than 50%.” Curry says, “We’ve mischaracterized the contributions from the sun and also from internal variability of the large-scale ocean circulation.” As a result, she said, “We cannot control the climate. There’s a whole lot of complicated processes going on in the climate system that have been oversimplified or ignored and fall broadly under the rubric of natural climate variability.” Curry notes that science supporting the benefits of additional carbon dioxide and warming is strong and not in dispute. “There are lots of benefits in terms of agricultural productivity, greening of the planet, fewer cold events, more rain in certain regions that with high populations that could use it,” said Curry. We discussed the criticisms of her and four colleagues who wrote the independent review of climate science commissioned by the Trump administration. “They say, ‘Oh, it’s not just CO₂, it’s also warmer temperatures and more rainfall,’” she said, referring to one of the criticisms by other scientists in Carbon Brief. “‘Aren’t you telling us that’s also caused by CO₂?’ So I don’t get what the gripe is. We’re gone through that section and added some updated references, but the fundamental story is unchanged.” As I documented at length at Forbes in 2019, in Apocalypse Never in 2020, and here at Public since 2021, including earlier this week, climate scientists, activists, and journalists have grossly exaggerated climate change to such an extent that much of what they say today must be considered disinformation, in that they know they are leaving the public with false ideas. “Global greening gets very short shrift in the [United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] IPCC report,” she notes. “They don’t talk about the reduction in mortality from reduced number of cold events. They only talk about the mortality from heat events. It’s part of the rules – we’re only talking about dangerous human-caused climate change, not about any benefits from human cause.” But what is the reason for this? What explains why the scientific community has misled the public about the nature of the problem for so long? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, read the full article, and listen to the entire podcast! FULL VIDEO AND ARTICLE CLICK BELOW
9:05

“There’s a doomsday view of climate change,” said Bill Gates on Tuesday. “Fortunately for all of us, this view is wrong….People will be able to live and thrive in most places on Earth for the foreseeable future. Emissions projections have gone down, and with the right policies and investments, innovation will allow us to drive emissions down much further.” In truth, Gates significantly understates just how wrong the doomsday problem is, says one of the world’s most influential climate scientists. “The weakest part of the argument has always been that warming is dangerous,” says Judy Curry, professor emerita at Georgia Tech University, in a new podcast with me. “It isn’t really. More people die from the cold than the heat. So this is probably a net benefit globally. Where’s the danger here?” Some climate scientists say Curry is a global warming denier, hasn’t done the research that they have done, and participated in a Trump administration misinformation effort. But Curry recognizes that the Earth is warming and that humans are contributing. Curry points out that “the modern warming started in the mid-19th century, somewhere between 1820 and 1860, following the end of the Little Ice Age. We’ve been warming since then. Nothing particularly surprising or unusual in my opinion. Is increasing CO₂ contributing to that? Yes.” The fact that warming has been beneficial “doesn’t mean that we should ignore the problem” she stresses and “doesn’t mean that we should keep pouring junk into the atmosphere. And Curry’s qualifications are exemplary. She frequently testifies before Congress and was one of five American scientists who conducted an independent review of climate science for the Department of Energy. And has done significantly more climate research than many of her critics. “I’m the one who’s done more climate dynamics research,” she noted. In truth, scientists have for decades been exaggerating the human impact compared to what nature does. When asked what percentage of the warming she would ascribe to humans, Curry said, “I would say I wouldn’t go much more than 50%.” Curry says, “We’ve mischaracterized the contributions from the sun and also from internal variability of the large-scale ocean circulation.” As a result, she said, “We cannot control the climate. There’s a whole lot of complicated processes going on in the climate system that have been oversimplified or ignored and fall broadly under the rubric of natural climate variability.” Curry notes that science supporting the benefits of additional carbon dioxide and warming is strong and not in dispute. “There are lots of benefits in terms of agricultural productivity, greening of the planet, fewer cold events, more rain in certain regions that with high populations that could use it,” said Curry. We discussed the criticisms of her and four colleagues who wrote the independent review of climate science commissioned by the Trump administration. “They say, ‘Oh, it’s not just CO₂, it’s also warmer temperatures and more rainfall,’” she said, referring to one of the criticisms by other scientists in Carbon Brief. “‘Aren’t you telling us that’s also caused by CO₂?’ So I don’t get what the gripe is. We’re gone through that section and added some updated references, but the fundamental story is unchanged.” As I documented at length at Forbes in 2019, in Apocalypse Never in 2020, and here at Public since 2021, including earlier this week, climate scientists, activists, and journalists have grossly exaggerated climate change to such an extent that much of what they say today must be considered disinformation, in that they know they are leaving the public with false ideas. “Global greening gets very short shrift in the [United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] IPCC report,” she notes. “They don’t talk about the reduction in mortality from reduced number of cold events. They only talk about the mortality from heat events. It’s part of the rules – we’re only talking about dangerous human-caused climate change, not about any benefits from human cause.” But what is the reason for this? What explains why the scientific community has misled the public about the nature of the problem for so long? Please subscribe now to support Public's award-winning investigative reporting, read the full article, and listen to the entire podcast! FULL VIDEO AND ARTICLE CLICK BELOW

Michael Shellenberger

66,361 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🚨 EXTREMELY URGENT APPEAL FOR GAZA 🚨 Childhood in Gaza is not disappearing suddenly; it is being erased slowly and painfully, drop by drop, with every day that passes without water, and with every child who walks between tents and rubble searching for a single sip that might allow them to breathe and stay alive. One child spent long hours moving from place to place in search of water—not asking for toys, not for safety, not even for a future, but for just one sip to keep their small body alive—only to return with empty hands. 💧 Water is running out, and children in Gaza are dying of thirst before the eyes of the world. In Gaza, thirst is no longer a possible danger or a future threat; it has become a daily, deadly reality that slowly exhausts fragile bodies and turns life into a constant struggle for survival. Small, fragile bodies collapse from dehydration, cracked lips bleed from thirst, and tiny hands reach out—not asking for food or medicine, but for one thing only: water 💧 This week, in a rare moment of humanity amid a cruel global silence, three people refused to be part of that silence and chose to stand in the face of death: 🔥 Felix (GoliathFan1952) ✨ William Menaker (Will 🦥 Menaker) 🤍 Eyup Lovely (Eyup Lovely) They did not turn away, they did not wait for justifications, and they did not delay action. They used their voices and their positions when silence was the easier choice, and because of them, clean drinking water reached children and families who were only moments away from dying of thirst. In Gaza, a cup of water is no longer a basic human right; it has become the harsh line between a child surviving until morning and a mother holding her child’s lifeless body at dawn. What you gave was not a passing donation—it was a real act of rescue, a direct intervention against death, and a clear message that humanity has not yet disappeared. Your voices pierced the siege, your support opened a path to life, and your solidarity became a shield protecting children at a moment when they had nothing else. 🚨 Time is running out, and every hour without water brings another child closer to danger. 👉 Donate now, because waiting can be fatal. 💧 Because water in Gaza means life If water arrives tonight, a child may survive and sleep in peace. If it does not— there may be no good news in the morning.
1:17

🚨 EXTREMELY URGENT APPEAL FOR GAZA 🚨 Childhood in Gaza is not disappearing suddenly; it is being erased slowly and painfully, drop by drop, with every day that passes without water, and with every child who walks between tents and rubble searching for a single sip that might allow them to breathe and stay alive. One child spent long hours moving from place to place in search of water—not asking for toys, not for safety, not even for a future, but for just one sip to keep their small body alive—only to return with empty hands. 💧 Water is running out, and children in Gaza are dying of thirst before the eyes of the world. In Gaza, thirst is no longer a possible danger or a future threat; it has become a daily, deadly reality that slowly exhausts fragile bodies and turns life into a constant struggle for survival. Small, fragile bodies collapse from dehydration, cracked lips bleed from thirst, and tiny hands reach out—not asking for food or medicine, but for one thing only: water 💧 This week, in a rare moment of humanity amid a cruel global silence, three people refused to be part of that silence and chose to stand in the face of death: 🔥 Felix (GoliathFan1952) ✨ William Menaker (Will 🦥 Menaker) 🤍 Eyup Lovely (Eyup Lovely) They did not turn away, they did not wait for justifications, and they did not delay action. They used their voices and their positions when silence was the easier choice, and because of them, clean drinking water reached children and families who were only moments away from dying of thirst. In Gaza, a cup of water is no longer a basic human right; it has become the harsh line between a child surviving until morning and a mother holding her child’s lifeless body at dawn. What you gave was not a passing donation—it was a real act of rescue, a direct intervention against death, and a clear message that humanity has not yet disappeared. Your voices pierced the siege, your support opened a path to life, and your solidarity became a shield protecting children at a moment when they had nothing else. 🚨 Time is running out, and every hour without water brings another child closer to danger. 👉 Donate now, because waiting can be fatal. 💧 Because water in Gaza means life If water arrives tonight, a child may survive and sleep in peace. If it does not— there may be no good news in the morning.

Muhmmed Project𓂆 🇵🇸

273,536 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

COOKED UP IN RAYNER's KITCHEN Five people have been arrested following serious allegations of electoral fraud in Tameside. The question every national outlet is avoiding is why Angela Rayner has not been called in? The threshold for a voluntary police interview is possession of material knowledge relevant to an investigation. Rayner meets it on four separate grounds. 1. She received a formal written complaint on 12 April containing photographic evidence of the precise conduct under investigation. Police need to know who in her office received it, who decided not to act, whether she was personally informed, and what steps if any followed. 2. She employs the declared winner. She would know his political activity and whether he discussed the ward with her before or after 12 April. 3. The scheme was discussed in her kitchen by her activists at an event she hosted. Police need to know what she heard that evening and whether concerns reached her through any other route. 4. Internal Labour WhatsApp groups were used to coordinate the scheme and messages were deleted. As the senior Labour figure in the area, the question of which groups she belonged to and who she was in contact with requires an answer only she can provide. A detective constable with this file would have put her in a room before the week was out. The failure to call her in is a choice. Someone made it. Andy Burnham's Greater Manchester Police know where Angela Rayner lives. Why have they not paid her a visit? Read my full article here; _________ I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). 👉 You can also support me with a one-off contribution using one of these links. 👉 👉 Raja Miah MBE
14:52

COOKED UP IN RAYNER's KITCHEN Five people have been arrested following serious allegations of electoral fraud in Tameside. The question every national outlet is avoiding is why Angela Rayner has not been called in? The threshold for a voluntary police interview is possession of material knowledge relevant to an investigation. Rayner meets it on four separate grounds. 1. She received a formal written complaint on 12 April containing photographic evidence of the precise conduct under investigation. Police need to know who in her office received it, who decided not to act, whether she was personally informed, and what steps if any followed. 2. She employs the declared winner. She would know his political activity and whether he discussed the ward with her before or after 12 April. 3. The scheme was discussed in her kitchen by her activists at an event she hosted. Police need to know what she heard that evening and whether concerns reached her through any other route. 4. Internal Labour WhatsApp groups were used to coordinate the scheme and messages were deleted. As the senior Labour figure in the area, the question of which groups she belonged to and who she was in contact with requires an answer only she can provide. A detective constable with this file would have put her in a room before the week was out. The failure to call her in is a choice. Someone made it. Andy Burnham's Greater Manchester Police know where Angela Rayner lives. Why have they not paid her a visit? Read my full article here; _________ I’m Raja Miah MBE. For seven years, I led a campaign that exposed how senior Labour politicians helped protect Pakistani rape gangs. The people of my town helped force the national inquiry. My work is free. No paywalls. No gatekeeping. No exclusions. Because the truth shouldn’t belong only to those who can afford it. If you can afford to do so, supporting me costs as little as 75p a week (£30 a year). 👉 You can also support me with a one-off contribution using one of these links. 👉 👉 Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

24,175 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Who Really Runs Labour's Red Wall Towns People are waking up. They can see what Oldham has become. Not a town suffering from isolated incidents, but a place where political violence, intimidation and institutional silence are now built into the system. Let us strip this back to the truth. A council candidates car was petrol bombed. His mothers home, with people inside, was set alight. These are not minor fires. These are not youths messing about. These are attempted murders carried out with intent and delivered with a clear message to stay in your place. And what did the local establishment do. The Manchester News MEN only touched the story once we forced them. Even then, they diluted it to the point of fiction. Greater Manchester Police then rolled out their familiar line that there is no threat to the wider public, as if anyone should be comforted by the idea that only political opponents are being firebombed. We have seen this script before. Over three years on and there is still no update on who blew up Arooj Shahs unlocked car. No progress. No transparency. No accountability. Every politically sensitive crime in this borough receives the same treatment. Minimise it. Bury it. Wait for the public to forget. Why does this happen. Because the people who benefit from this climate of fear depend on silence. They depend on compliant media. They depend on a police force willing to downplay political violence in order to protect the status quo. But that grip is slipping. Oldham is no longer the place where stories disappear. It is the place where the truth is finally being dragged into the light. We will continue exposing the attacks, the cover ups and the networks that still believe they own this town. And this is only the beginning. _________ I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. In a desperate attempt to stop me, Gtr Manchester Police attempted and failed to maliciously prosecute me, whilst politicians, Pakistani gangsters and Islamists openly incited my murder. Despite everything attempted against me, the world now knows the truth of the cover up of the industrial scale gang rape of our nation's children. Unfortunately, we’re running out of time. Whilst they are mobilising, we are yet to wake up to the scale of the threat. I cannot do this on my own. I need you to stand with me and help make sure we stop the takeover of the place we all call home. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. And still blacklisted by the legacy media. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. - Raja Miah MBE
10:19

Who Really Runs Labour's Red Wall Towns People are waking up. They can see what Oldham has become. Not a town suffering from isolated incidents, but a place where political violence, intimidation and institutional silence are now built into the system. Let us strip this back to the truth. A council candidates car was petrol bombed. His mothers home, with people inside, was set alight. These are not minor fires. These are not youths messing about. These are attempted murders carried out with intent and delivered with a clear message to stay in your place. And what did the local establishment do. The Manchester News MEN only touched the story once we forced them. Even then, they diluted it to the point of fiction. Greater Manchester Police then rolled out their familiar line that there is no threat to the wider public, as if anyone should be comforted by the idea that only political opponents are being firebombed. We have seen this script before. Over three years on and there is still no update on who blew up Arooj Shahs unlocked car. No progress. No transparency. No accountability. Every politically sensitive crime in this borough receives the same treatment. Minimise it. Bury it. Wait for the public to forget. Why does this happen. Because the people who benefit from this climate of fear depend on silence. They depend on compliant media. They depend on a police force willing to downplay political violence in order to protect the status quo. But that grip is slipping. Oldham is no longer the place where stories disappear. It is the place where the truth is finally being dragged into the light. We will continue exposing the attacks, the cover ups and the networks that still believe they own this town. And this is only the beginning. _________ I am Raja Miah. For seven years, I led a small team that exposed how politicians protected the rape gangs. In a desperate attempt to stop me, Gtr Manchester Police attempted and failed to maliciously prosecute me, whilst politicians, Pakistani gangsters and Islamists openly incited my murder. Despite everything attempted against me, the world now knows the truth of the cover up of the industrial scale gang rape of our nation's children. Unfortunately, we’re running out of time. Whilst they are mobilising, we are yet to wake up to the scale of the threat. I cannot do this on my own. I need you to stand with me and help make sure we stop the takeover of the place we all call home. 🔴 Subscribe to my newsletter – it’s free. Or support the work for just 75p a week (£3/month or £30/year). Whatever you do, please subscribe; 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 No corporate sponsors. No party machine. And still blacklisted by the legacy media. Just you and thousands of ordinary people who know what’s at stake. We’ve come this far. Help finish it. - Raja Miah MBE

Raja Miah

26,158 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

I keep thinking about one of the original moments that the Left really started targeting Charlie and making Turning Point the enemy and how Charlie never backed down. When we hired Candace Owens, I had the honor of it being the three of us traveling around quite a bit… we went everywhere. Between work and building organizationally, to putting her on tour for the very first time with Charlie, helping with her personal socials and website— just everything. Charlie wanted to do everything he possibly could to maximize her voice as he did with so many because he loved her and saw her ability to do so much good for America. But this was in the era of the rise of Antifa that was manufactured by the Left. The first real danger I think we ever experienced where we were just living our lives and it made us realize we were in for a larger long term war was when we were together, just eating breakfast before some meetings and suddenly outside our window a large gang of antifa had assembled and harassed us out of our meal and then, while shouting “fascists” over and over took us to the streets to surround us and scream in our faces. They poured water on us and I’m sure wanted to throw other things at us had the police not arrived on the street and got us out of there. Charlie never backed down, in fact, instead of getting angry or physical, he stood bravely and tried have a debate with these obviously paid antifa bad actors. My young and honorable friend, (he was always genuine in his desire to save every single person he could) stood there and gave those people as he did everyone the chance to talk about ideas and I personally witnessed how fearless he was many times in the face of dangerous, unhinged activists, early early on. He never once feared these people. He just wanted to do right by what he knew was right. He knew other bystanders were always watching and learning and there was no way he could back down and let these people lie and falsely frame America the way they were trying to do. I’ll never forget his smiling face, “have a wonderful day, enjoy your capitalist breakfast.” He would have tried to talk sense into anyone and everyone and that is what he did every single day. That is why Charlie won over America. He was honest, true and genuine. Never gave up and stood in the pocket in the face of paid agitators and evil.
0:13

I keep thinking about one of the original moments that the Left really started targeting Charlie and making Turning Point the enemy and how Charlie never backed down. When we hired Candace Owens, I had the honor of it being the three of us traveling around quite a bit… we went everywhere. Between work and building organizationally, to putting her on tour for the very first time with Charlie, helping with her personal socials and website— just everything. Charlie wanted to do everything he possibly could to maximize her voice as he did with so many because he loved her and saw her ability to do so much good for America. But this was in the era of the rise of Antifa that was manufactured by the Left. The first real danger I think we ever experienced where we were just living our lives and it made us realize we were in for a larger long term war was when we were together, just eating breakfast before some meetings and suddenly outside our window a large gang of antifa had assembled and harassed us out of our meal and then, while shouting “fascists” over and over took us to the streets to surround us and scream in our faces. They poured water on us and I’m sure wanted to throw other things at us had the police not arrived on the street and got us out of there. Charlie never backed down, in fact, instead of getting angry or physical, he stood bravely and tried have a debate with these obviously paid antifa bad actors. My young and honorable friend, (he was always genuine in his desire to save every single person he could) stood there and gave those people as he did everyone the chance to talk about ideas and I personally witnessed how fearless he was many times in the face of dangerous, unhinged activists, early early on. He never once feared these people. He just wanted to do right by what he knew was right. He knew other bystanders were always watching and learning and there was no way he could back down and let these people lie and falsely frame America the way they were trying to do. I’ll never forget his smiling face, “have a wonderful day, enjoy your capitalist breakfast.” He would have tried to talk sense into anyone and everyone and that is what he did every single day. That is why Charlie won over America. He was honest, true and genuine. Never gave up and stood in the pocket in the face of paid agitators and evil.

Tyler Bowyer

25,495 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1.⁠ Trump called it “great news” that AG Pam Bondi directed federal prosecutors to launch a grand jury investigation into how Obama administration officials handled intelligence on Russia's 2016 election interference. 2.⁠ Sources close to Netanyahu said a final decision has been made to fully occupy Gaza in order to eliminate Hamas completely. Netanyahu reportedly said, “If the IDF Chief of Staff has a problem with that, he can resign.” 3.⁠ Russia attacked the city of Lozova, in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine overnight, killing 1 person and injuring at least 10. High-rise buildings, residential areas, and critical infrastructure were hit, leaving parts of the city without power or water. 4.⁠ Police in Pakistan raided homes overnight, arresting at least 120 activists from Imran Khan’s PTI party ahead of protests marking 2 years since his jailing. PTI said over 200 were detained in Lahore alone, where the biggest demonstration is still set to go ahead despite the crackdown. 5.⁠ Former president of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, was arrested for supporting the protests against Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes. His son, Eduardo, called it “an arrest without a crime, without evidence, without a trial.” 6.⁠ Over 50 people are missing after a massive flood tore through Uttarkashi, smashing homes and roads in seconds. Water surged from the mountains, swallowing an entire village in northern India’s Uttarakhand state. 7.⁠ Tommy Robinson has been granted bail after an altercation at London’s St. Pancras station. Robinson said he was threatened by a drunk individual and acted in self-defense, striking first as the man advanced, knocking him unconscious. 8.⁠ The UK finally approved a vertical rocket launch…6 years after the Space Industry Act made it legal. Skyrora, a Glasgow-based company, got the green light to launch its 11m Skylark L rocket from the SaxaVord Spaceport in Shetland. 9.⁠ Texas’ House approved arrest warrants for dozens of Democrats who bailed to Illinois to block GOP-led redistricting. With no quorum, Republicans can’t pass Trump-backed maps that could flip 5 U.S. House seats. State troopers are now hunting any Democrats still in Texas. 10.⁠ Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. just dropped the hammer on employees allegedly trying to leak next-gen 2nm chip tech - the stuff that will power future iPhones and AI superbrains. Caught mid-snoop, the suspects were fired and slapped with legal action, right as TSMC preps for mass production of its most cutting-edge silicon ever.
0:34

🚨12 HOUR NEWS RECAP 1.⁠ Trump called it “great news” that AG Pam Bondi directed federal prosecutors to launch a grand jury investigation into how Obama administration officials handled intelligence on Russia's 2016 election interference. 2.⁠ Sources close to Netanyahu said a final decision has been made to fully occupy Gaza in order to eliminate Hamas completely. Netanyahu reportedly said, “If the IDF Chief of Staff has a problem with that, he can resign.” 3.⁠ Russia attacked the city of Lozova, in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine overnight, killing 1 person and injuring at least 10. High-rise buildings, residential areas, and critical infrastructure were hit, leaving parts of the city without power or water. 4.⁠ Police in Pakistan raided homes overnight, arresting at least 120 activists from Imran Khan’s PTI party ahead of protests marking 2 years since his jailing. PTI said over 200 were detained in Lahore alone, where the biggest demonstration is still set to go ahead despite the crackdown. 5.⁠ Former president of Brazil, Jair Bolsonaro, was arrested for supporting the protests against Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes. His son, Eduardo, called it “an arrest without a crime, without evidence, without a trial.” 6.⁠ Over 50 people are missing after a massive flood tore through Uttarkashi, smashing homes and roads in seconds. Water surged from the mountains, swallowing an entire village in northern India’s Uttarakhand state. 7.⁠ Tommy Robinson has been granted bail after an altercation at London’s St. Pancras station. Robinson said he was threatened by a drunk individual and acted in self-defense, striking first as the man advanced, knocking him unconscious. 8.⁠ The UK finally approved a vertical rocket launch…6 years after the Space Industry Act made it legal. Skyrora, a Glasgow-based company, got the green light to launch its 11m Skylark L rocket from the SaxaVord Spaceport in Shetland. 9.⁠ Texas’ House approved arrest warrants for dozens of Democrats who bailed to Illinois to block GOP-led redistricting. With no quorum, Republicans can’t pass Trump-backed maps that could flip 5 U.S. House seats. State troopers are now hunting any Democrats still in Texas. 10.⁠ Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. just dropped the hammer on employees allegedly trying to leak next-gen 2nm chip tech - the stuff that will power future iPhones and AI superbrains. Caught mid-snoop, the suspects were fired and slapped with legal action, right as TSMC preps for mass production of its most cutting-edge silicon ever.

Mario Nawfal

335,357 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten