Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨🚨 EPIC Paul Offit takedown! PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE WIDELY! A point by point analysis of the false claims and lies he presented as scientific fact in his infamous 2024 "DNA fragments in COVID vaccines are completely harmless" video: LIE #1: The mRNA vaccines contain fragments of DNA, but...

338,876 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

7 Comments

ACIMstudent's profile picture
ACIMstudent1 year ago

Thank you! I knew of his conflicts of interest two decades ago when I chose not to vaccinate my children. He has sold out and he’s fine with it. $$$

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple's profile picture
SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 year ago

🏆Cybersecurity Certification Gold Rush is ON!🥇 With the global cybersecurity market projected to hit $376.32 billion by 2029, millions are scrambling to upskill.📈 Over 4.7 million were already certified, & that number's only climbing. Be the one!

The Coerced Nurse's profile picture
The Coerced Nurse1 year ago

My body is a long term study. It is reacting just as @P_J_Buckhaults predicted. ✅ Severe reaction to the Covid Vaccine ✅ Despite Transverse Myelitis being a “one and done” attack, my cardiovascular system and diaphragm began deteriorating at 1.5 years following the initial injury ✅ My immune system then started failing, making me susceptible to opportunistic infection ✅ My medical team is now concerned I have cancer ordering me to see a team of Hematologist at Ohio State. There is no excuse for there to be dismissal of concerns brought fourth especially when we all know there are no long term studies. Am I and others that may have the same fate expected to stay quiet about the hand waving of his hypothesis that is proving true? I promise you that will not be the case.

Annie's profile picture
Annie1 year ago

@elonmusk @FLOTUS @POTUS @RealRFKJR2024 @SenRonJohnson @NicoleShanahan Thank You in advance for reading this important information Save the Children.

Acupuncturist's profile picture
Acupuncturist1 year ago

@Fynnderella1 @drcole12 @Honest_Medicine @JesslovesMJK ☝🏻

Degenimus's profile picture
Degenimus1 year ago

oh boy, trying harder than Ton’s hype crew

Cats With Tales's profile picture
Cats With Tales1 year ago

Dr. Dalgleish has also developed an extremely promising low cost immune booster to fight cancer, please have a look. They don't have funds for the large clinical trials regulatory agencies are requiring. Meantime, pass 'right to try' legislation!

Related Videos

Professor Emeritus Yasufumi Murakami of Tokyo University of Science: "It is almost certain that vaccines are contaminated with DNA. mRNA vaccines containing the DNA causes turbo cancers." Professor Murakami explains the mechanism of turbo cancers: The covid vaccines are expected to contain only mRNA. However, it has been proven that the vaccines contain considerable amounts of DNA and other substances that should not be present. There is no doubt about it now. DNA can enter human cells very easily, regardless of length, and can get into cells everywhere. When DNA gets in the center of an important gene, the important gene will stop functioning. One problem is that the mRNA vaccine of Pfizer contains a promoter sequence of the cancer virus called SV40. This sequence could enter the human genome, and awakens and activates dormant carcinogenic genes. As a result, the risk of developing cancer increases. mRNA vaccines increase the risk of developing cancer while suppressing the immunity. Vaccination increases the risk of developing cancer dramatically compared to the unvaccinated state. The more people get vaccinated, the more people will probably get cancer. Vaccines appear to increase the risk of all types of cancers. There is credible information that the number of leukemia cases is on the rise. Vaccination causes the promoter sequence of the cancer virus to enter white blood cells and attach to red blood cells everywhere. As a result, more and more leukemia cases are reported. A lot of spikes of mRNA are produced. The spikes would be most protected from destruction. Possibly, long spike genes remain intact. So, if the long spike genes remain there, gene expression will continue to take place all the time. That is, spikes are generated forever. Once the DNA gets into the stem cells, the DNA will keep creating more and more spikes. As a result, IgG4 antibodies are induced. The number of spike-producing cells will not decrease, and it becomes impossible to get rid of spike-producing cells. As a results, It becomes normal for spikes to be present in cells. The produced spikes then flow into the bloodstream and cause a variety of health problems. So, any vaccine that induces IgG4 is deemed as a defective vaccine, and should no longer be produced. Normally, cancer cells are born and grow slowly. However, the vaccine suppresses the immunity, which makes it easier for cancer cells to grow. The vaccines cause turbo cancers. Suppression of the immunity is a major factor of turbo cancers. The increase in IgG4 antibodies results in suppression of cancer immunity. The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more intense the inflammation caused by the vaccine becomes. DNA is a foreign substance to the cells. So, DNA causes a severe reaction and kills the immune system of the cells. The more DNA the vaccine contains, the more severe the side effects caused by the vaccine become. Vaccines could contain many different impurities, but one possibility could be DNA. In the first place, DNA is something that should not be put into cells of your body.

You

574,563 views • 2 years ago

🚨🚨🚨🚨 For the first time, German TV MDR covers DNA contamination in Pfizer's mRNA vaccine! ---------Transcript----------- We are in a private laboratory in Magdeburg. Professor Brigitte König is examining Corona vaccines here. The result, all samples are contaminated. "With foreign DNA that should not be in the vaccine in this quantity. From my point of view, the alarming result is that all 5 batches had significant foreign DNA in them, which are well above the limit. It's about the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine. 5 batches were given to the Magdeburg laboratory because there was a suspicion." Foreign DNA could be contained in the vaccine, and beyond the limit. According to WHO, the limit is a total DNA content of 10 nanograms per dose. It is important that this is not exceeded, because there is a risk that foreign DNA could penetrate human cells. Brigitte König is an external professor at the medical faculty of the University of Magdeburg. She shows us the result of her privately conducted investigation. All 5 examined batches are contaminated. For the lowest concentration, the limit was exceeded by 83 times. The highest concentration found was 354 times the limit to König. This is concerning. The client of the analysis is also a private individual. The biologist Dr. Jürgen Kirchner. He has been one of the vocal critics of mRNA vaccines for years. He operates a website called Gene Vaccines. There he also advertises his books written under a pseudonym. His last one is called "Sullied." He has also appeared on YouTubers like the controversial Corona critic Paul Brandenburg. And discussed with him his theses on vaccines. Also the findings from Magdeburg. When DNA contaminations are found in a vaccine, that are as far above the limits as we have found, then in my view a special paragraph of the Medicines Act automatically applies, that is paragraph 5. It says if a medicinal product is questionable, then it must be taken off the market. And the biologist tries to achieve this. In September, he was at a hearing in the Bundestag's Petitions Committee on the topic of pandemic planning. Here he used the opportunity to present the analysis results from Magdeburg. These are gigantic exceedances of a limit for a really very questionable medicinal product. But do the vaccines actually contain foreign DNA? The accusation is not new. Already in April 2023, American scientists found foreign DNA above the limit in the vaccines from BioNTech and Moderna. Also in this pre-publication of a Canadian study from the end of October, several scientists come to a similar conclusion. The researchers write, our results extend the existing concerns regarding vaccine safety. But are such traces of foreign DNA actually dangerous? Humans constantly carry foreign DNA in themselves. This can come from food, but also if bacteria enter the lungs. These floating DNA snippets are digested in the gut by enzymes. But there is a difference with the mRNA vaccination. The vaccine contains so-called lipid nanoparticles. They smuggle the mRNA into the cells. They do not differentiate, however, whether they transport mRNA or DNA. Could foreign DNA thereby directly penetrate the cell nucleus? That is at least the concern of this American researcher, Prof. Dr. Philip Buckhaults. He is a clear proponent of mRNA technology. Yet he too says he found DNA residues in Pfizer vaccine. Here at a hearing in the South Carolina Senate, he explains the potential consequences of DNA. By email he writes us, at the moment no one knows for sure, whether the foreign DNA has caused damage or will cause damage. But there is clearly a justified theoretical risk of genetic damage to long-lived stem cells. We asked several renowned German scientists about this concern. Only a few reply to our request. Among them is Prof. Emanuel Wyler from the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, an institute funded by the federal government. He deems it extremely unlikely that the DNA could have negative consequences. Further, he writes, DNA in vaccines is not a new topic and is also tested for, for example, in a flu vaccine. Until now, no one has been interested, or one rightly trusts that the Paul Ehrlich Institute as the responsible authority performs the testing work correctly. In my opinion, this shows that this is not about DNA in vaccines, but either about fundamentally questioning vaccinations, our best weapon against infectious diseases, or about creating a sensation with the issue of Corona. However, Prof. Gerald Dyker, a chemist at the Ruhr University, does think that negative consequences are conceivable. He writes to us, against the background that one was under extreme time pressure, that the manufacturer decided, either without knowledge or with the acquiescence of supervisory authorities, to release the product with the remaining DNA impurities for mass vaccination. For Prof. Bernd Mühlbauer of the Drug Commission, however, it is still not clear at all, whether the vaccine is actually contaminated to a worrying extent. But he writes that residual amounts of DNA in the case of an mRNA vaccine cannot penetrate the cell nucleus and cause damage. Such experiments, including animal tests over several generations, are necessary and perhaps have already been conducted. And how do the authorities respond to the debate? The Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the surveillance and safety of vaccines. We want to know, whether they themselves have tested the vaccines for foreign DNA or at least checked the results from Magdeburg. The written response is that parameters such as the residual DNA content in the vaccine are only experimentally tested by the manufacturer. The Institute thus does not test the vaccines themselves for DNA contamination but relies on the manufacturers' test protocols. The fact that the authority neither tests itself nor checks the analysis results from Magdeburg causes surprise to Professor Brigitte König. "I would have expected, or assumed, that the authorities would at least randomly check the end product for contamination and purity. Depending on the product, or if something else is inside. As I said, the authorities can do that. Especially the Paul Ehrlich Institute has the equipment for it." The competent Federal Ministry of Health questions the analysis from Magdeburg and points out that some of the tested batches were already expired, according to Dr. Kirchner's notification. However, for the found foreign DNA this is irrelevant, says the scientist. The DNA in these lipid particles does not multiply. And is more likely to be decomposed. That is, if the vaccine is not expired, we might expect even higher values but not lower ones. The DNA does not multiply in a sterile vaccine. Since the authorities apparently doubt the investigation results from Magdeburg, we want to have various batches tested ourselves. We contacted more than 20 laboratories, some of them at German universities, but also private providers who can conduct such analyses. From all, we received rejections or no response. So, we failed to have a DNA analysis conducted independently once again. It would indeed be important to conclusively clarify the question of the DNA content. Because one reason for suspected DNA contamination could be the manufacturing process itself, which is different from the one used during the authorization study. The vaccine used for the clinical studies was manufactured mechanically without the involvement of microorganisms. This production path is named Process 1 in the documents of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Pfizer then switched to a different production technique, referred to as Process 2. Only very few subjects in the authorization study received this vaccine. Here, the material was supplied by genetically modified bacteria. This process was apparently less complex. But did it actually pose a higher risk? That there were differences between the batches of the two different manufacturing processes has been a concern. Questions about comparability, characterization, and clinical suitability were raised. We ask BioNTech why the manufacturing process was changed nonetheless, but we do not receive an answer to this question. Regarding the suspected DNA contamination identified by the Magdeburg scientist, the company writes that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is not contaminated with DNA. Furthermore, it states that the batches were subjected to comprehensive quality control by the manufacturer. The Magdeburg scientist says that she has now examined additional vaccine batches. Here too, she found foreign DNA. However, we as an editorial team were not able to conclusively answer whether this analysis is indeed accurate and, most importantly, whether the suspected DNA contamination can cause harm. The most recent act in the debate is this official-looking letter from an association called Medical Treatment Association, which warns doctors about the vaccine. However, as informed by the responsible authorities, this is said to be a false report. ----------------------------------- H/T: Aquarius-elect 🗣️

aussie17

456,115 views • 2 years ago

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 - Drug regulators BUSTED hiding COVID jab risks. Internal emails reveal that the TGA (Australia’s FDA) KNEW that, yes, foreign DNA from the COVID shots really could integrate into the human genome—despite repeatedly assuring the public it was impossible. Rebekkah Barnett (Rebekah Barnett) dropped the bombshell report exposing what TGA staff were saying behind closed doors—and it’s nothing like the rosy picture they painted in public. In one email, a TGA staffer debunked Dr. Paul Offit’s claims that DNA from the COVID shots couldn’t integrate into the human genome without an enzyme called integrase. The staffer wrote: “Foreign DNA can integrate into chromosomal DNA in the absence of an integrase in mammalian cells. This comes from the DNA damage/repair literature where breaks in DNA are repaired through processes called non-homologous end joining or homologous recombination.” This directly contradicted the TGA’s official narrative, which repeatedly denied that such genomic integration was even possible. Another email revealed that the TGA wasn’t even aware of studies to back up their public denials. A senior staffer admitted: “I would be uncomfortable with that [statement about plasmid DNA entering the human genome] as I am unaware of studies which have tested this.” So, behind closed doors, they had serious, unanswered questions about DNA contamination and the potential for genomic integration. But to the public, they said, “Everything is fine.” This isn’t how things are supposed to work. Regulators like the TGA are meant to protect people, not withhold critical information. This is yet another shocking example of how the so-called “experts” prioritized controlling the narrative over presenting the facts. Adding to the alarm, new research from Yale has found spike protein lingering in the blood years after individuals received their last COVID shot, making concerns about integration with human DNA even more plausible. Senator Gerard Rennick from Australia joins the show to discuss these damning revelations. (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,761,909 views • 1 year ago

"There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident...the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product [in the C19 jabs] is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme." Canadian Comprehensive Physician Dr. Chris Shoemaker (@CShoemakerMD) describes for the RAIR Foundation (RAIR Foundation USA) how the DNA contamination of the COVID injections "was not an accident." Shoemaker notes that "They have lied to us in the extreme" and "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term." "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished," Shoemaker says. "And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be." "What's the difference [if there is] DNA is in [the jabs] instead of just mRNA? The difference is that...the DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, [and] can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell," Shoemaker says. "And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8- to 10-year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots." Partial transcription of clip: "There's absolutely no question that this was not an accident. There's absolutely no question that it was carefully and scientifically accomplished. And the fact that we have one-third DNA product and two-thirds RNA product is, for whatever reason, the ratio that the makers wanted it to be. They have lied to us in the extreme. "We are in danger in the extreme, not just in the short term. We know the 2 percent, 3 percent of people who passed away suddenly and surprisingly and that's way more than should happen. But the long term effect on the ability to fight cancer or for a cancer to perhaps be a turbo cancer, all these are being influenced by both DNA and RNA that is within us. "The key thing is that it makes the whole process last longer. If it was only mRNA, it would probably be 8 to 12 months only that mRNA would seed out into your body and be repeatedly creating spike, repeatedly creating spike. Remember, the end-product is the most dangerous part of this human engineered genome. The spike protein is the thing that congeals blood cells against each other. The spike protein is the thing that, if it's in your liver, is waving a flag saying, Hey, I'm not your liver. I'm not a human liver. I've got this strange created spike protein. You can identify that I'm not your liver, and you can attack it, and you can make hepatitis for this person because it's not even their liver. "This is what mRNA does is create a flag so that you're attacking through your healthy immune system. Your healthy immune system is going after it in organ after organ after organ. For some people, it's just a specific organ that was already a bit weak to begin with. And for other people, it's a different organ. But either way, mRNA produces a spike flag, which your immune system attacks. "To return to your question about DNA, what's the difference that DNA is in there instead of just mRNA? The difference is that the DNA can, for years, not just 8 to 12 months. The DNA, functionally, once in the nucleus, can influence the nucleus, can produce mRNA near the nucleus and have that mRNA migrate out into the cytoplasm of the cell. And once that's done, what should be, at worst, an 8-month process inside your body is, in fact, an 8 to 10 year process inside your body because of the nefarious decision to allow DNA in these shots."

Sense Receptor

95,273 views • 1 year ago