正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Eric Weinstein says aliens could have access to multiple temporal dimensions & thats why they are so elusive 👽🛸😱 “Imagine you could do that with time. You didn’t have to go back through time to go back in time.” He asks how many dimensions of time there actually are....

InterstellarUAP's profile picture

Interstellar

150,554 subscribers

43,856 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🚨 BREAKING: Eric Weinstein & Eric Davis Talk about Interdimensional Beings 😱🛸👽 "I keep hearing about interdimensional beings, which causes me to want to throw up in my mouth." – Weinstein slams the term, but Davis reveals: "I think he's heard that from his briefings... on the crash retrieval program." We move through three spatial dimensions and one time dimension, making US interdimensional already. But what if UFO intelligences navigate MULTIPLE temporal dimensions? "If we had an adversary that was aware of multiple temporal dimensions where we're only aware of one... we have an arrow of time and they would have multiple." Davis warns: "Nobody does threat assessments like that," but the implications are terrifying – no one's even tried! What do you think – are we facing a multi-dimensional threat? Share your UFO encounters below! #UFO #disclosure
1:55

🚨 BREAKING: Eric Weinstein & Eric Davis Talk about Interdimensional Beings 😱🛸👽 "I keep hearing about interdimensional beings, which causes me to want to throw up in my mouth." – Weinstein slams the term, but Davis reveals: "I think he's heard that from his briefings... on the crash retrieval program." We move through three spatial dimensions and one time dimension, making US interdimensional already. But what if UFO intelligences navigate MULTIPLE temporal dimensions? "If we had an adversary that was aware of multiple temporal dimensions where we're only aware of one... we have an arrow of time and they would have multiple." Davis warns: "Nobody does threat assessments like that," but the implications are terrifying – no one's even tried! What do you think – are we facing a multi-dimensional threat? Share your UFO encounters below! #UFO #disclosure

Interstellar

50,109 次观看 • 6 个月前

Physicist Avi Loeb just told me that futuristic technology could enable humanity to travel “faster than the speed of light.” But we would have to move beyond the three dimensions we are familiar with. And he speculated that advanced alien civilizations could already have access to these dimensions. You need to hear his fascinating theory: “Think about living on the surface of a balloon.” “That is two dimensional.” “You might not be aware that there is a third dimension because you are just living on the surface of that balloon.” “If there is another being that is capable of taking advantage of the third dimension, then that being will cross the distance between two points on the surface of the balloon faster than you can imagine.” “Because the travel between the two points can go through the third dimension that connects the two points—not necessarily on the curved surface of the balloon.” “So there are, in principle, possibilities of navigating in more than the dimensions that we are familiar with.” “We are familiar with three spatial dimensions plus time.” “If there are more than three and there is a technological way of taking advantage of those … objects will appear and disappear in ways that we cannot understand.” “Einstein’s theory of relativity states that no material object can move faster than light.” “However, if there are extra dimensions, you might actually travel faster than light in the three dimensions, even though you’re traveling less than the speed of light in the extra dimensions.”
3:09

Physicist Avi Loeb just told me that futuristic technology could enable humanity to travel “faster than the speed of light.” But we would have to move beyond the three dimensions we are familiar with. And he speculated that advanced alien civilizations could already have access to these dimensions. You need to hear his fascinating theory: “Think about living on the surface of a balloon.” “That is two dimensional.” “You might not be aware that there is a third dimension because you are just living on the surface of that balloon.” “If there is another being that is capable of taking advantage of the third dimension, then that being will cross the distance between two points on the surface of the balloon faster than you can imagine.” “Because the travel between the two points can go through the third dimension that connects the two points—not necessarily on the curved surface of the balloon.” “So there are, in principle, possibilities of navigating in more than the dimensions that we are familiar with.” “We are familiar with three spatial dimensions plus time.” “If there are more than three and there is a technological way of taking advantage of those … objects will appear and disappear in ways that we cannot understand.” “Einstein’s theory of relativity states that no material object can move faster than light.” “However, if there are extra dimensions, you might actually travel faster than light in the three dimensions, even though you’re traveling less than the speed of light in the extra dimensions.”

Jan Jekielek

31,984 次观看 • 5 个月前

Eric Weinstein and Eric Davis break down what "interdimensional beings" actually means and the implications should concern everyone. We already move through three spatial dimensions and we move through time. That already makes us "interdimensional beings" so what are people really trying to say? Davis thinks David Grusch picked it up from classified briefings on the crash retrieval program and is repeating it at a surface level but that its possibly pointing at something true. What if the intelligence behind these UFOs operates across multiple temporal dimensions where we only experience one? Where we only have a single arrow of time they might have several. The implications are incredibly concerning when it comes to doing a threat assessment on what it means to face something with that kind of capability and according to Davis, nobody in government has even tried... Episode drops today 2PM EST / 11AM PST
1:55

Eric Weinstein and Eric Davis break down what "interdimensional beings" actually means and the implications should concern everyone. We already move through three spatial dimensions and we move through time. That already makes us "interdimensional beings" so what are people really trying to say? Davis thinks David Grusch picked it up from classified briefings on the crash retrieval program and is repeating it at a surface level but that its possibly pointing at something true. What if the intelligence behind these UFOs operates across multiple temporal dimensions where we only experience one? Where we only have a single arrow of time they might have several. The implications are incredibly concerning when it comes to doing a threat assessment on what it means to face something with that kind of capability and according to Davis, nobody in government has even tried... Episode drops today 2PM EST / 11AM PST

American Alchemy

154,076 次观看 • 6 个月前

Jensen Huang reveals how he actually spends his time as CEO and why he often refuses to sleep "I spend a lot of time talking to our employees. People are surprised how much time I spend eating in the cafeteria, whether it's lunch or dinner" "I need to come back to my number one job function and what I believe is the most important responsibility I have, which is to be the custodian of the culture" "If you want to be the custodian of the culture, you can't do it through CNN, you can't do it through Forbes magazine articles" "You have to do it 1% at a time unfortunately, or large crowds at a time" "I try to spend my time as much as I can on the things that I believe will have long-lasting influence on our company" "As a CEO, your time is not always yours. You need to have the discipline to make it yours. I'll often come into the office and tell my admin to clear my calendars just so I can have that time back" "You also come to the conclusion that as a CEO, not sleeping is a good choice. That's always a good option. It creates more time when you don't sleep"
4:26

Jensen Huang reveals how he actually spends his time as CEO and why he often refuses to sleep "I spend a lot of time talking to our employees. People are surprised how much time I spend eating in the cafeteria, whether it's lunch or dinner" "I need to come back to my number one job function and what I believe is the most important responsibility I have, which is to be the custodian of the culture" "If you want to be the custodian of the culture, you can't do it through CNN, you can't do it through Forbes magazine articles" "You have to do it 1% at a time unfortunately, or large crowds at a time" "I try to spend my time as much as I can on the things that I believe will have long-lasting influence on our company" "As a CEO, your time is not always yours. You need to have the discipline to make it yours. I'll often come into the office and tell my admin to clear my calendars just so I can have that time back" "You also come to the conclusion that as a CEO, not sleeping is a good choice. That's always a good option. It creates more time when you don't sleep"

Jaynit

57,759 次观看 • 3 个月前

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.
0:23

FOR THOSE WHO ARE CONFUSED… We experience TIME as a straight line, one moment after another, PAST TO PRESENT TO FUTURE. But that is only how it appears from inside the system. Beings in higher dimensions, what some call “ORACLES” OR “GODS,” do not experience time like this. They do not move through it. They observe it in its entirety. A closer analogy would be CHANNELS ON A SCREEN. What is playing on FOX and what is playing on CBS is not separate in existence, it is only separated by perspective. Both are happening at the same time, fully active, fully real. In the same way, what we call 1950 and what we call 2004 are not distant points moving away from each other. They are both present within the same total field of reality. From that level of awareness, nothing is being “waited on.” There is NO DELAY. There is only ACCESS. A shift of perception is all that is needed, like changing the channel. So if everything exists at once, then your FUTURE is not something that is coming toward you. It is something that already exists. The version of you 20 YEARS FROM NOW is already there. You have already CHOSEN THAT PATH, you have already GONE THROUGH WHAT COMES WITH IT, you have already LIVED THROUGH IT ALL. And what you are doing now is not creating it. You are MOVING THROUGH IT. Slowly remembering why you are there at all.

THE VOICE 🌹 🗣🎙🇺🇸🦅🌎⚓💜♠️CHRIST CONSCIOUSNESS

40,362 次观看 • 2 个月前

Why do time slow down as you approach the speed of light? Because space and time are not separate things. They are woven together into spacetime, and the speed of light is built into its structure. Every object moves through spacetime at the same fundamental rate. When you are at rest, almost all of that motion is through time. As you move faster through space, some of that motion is redirected away from time. The total stays constant, so your clock must tick more slowly. This is not philosophy or metaphor. It has been measured with atomic clocks on airplanes and satellites. Move fast enough, and you do not just cross distances differently, you experience less time itself.
1:07

Why do time slow down as you approach the speed of light? Because space and time are not separate things. They are woven together into spacetime, and the speed of light is built into its structure. Every object moves through spacetime at the same fundamental rate. When you are at rest, almost all of that motion is through time. As you move faster through space, some of that motion is redirected away from time. The total stays constant, so your clock must tick more slowly. This is not philosophy or metaphor. It has been measured with atomic clocks on airplanes and satellites. Move fast enough, and you do not just cross distances differently, you experience less time itself.

The Scientific Lens

12,149 次观看 • 6 个月前

Look, I know I'm harping on this a lot today, but I can't stop thinking about Occam's Razor here: Why are we not seriously considering that the reason we allegedly have mystery craft that defy the laws of physics but do not have physicists because "the one type of person who could possibly help with this" IS EXACTLY WHO THEY DON'T WANT? Imagine for a moment that they have a crime scene that they are assigning unqualified personnel to. Why would you do that? Because you're trying not to solve the the crime, only to make it LOOK like you are. Why would you not try to solve a crime? Because you already know who did it. But you go through the motions because you don't want anyone to know you know. That raises other questions, of course, like, "did they already solve it a long time ago?" or "did they not need to solve it because they were told how it works by whoever made it?" Maybe I'm wrong. But it feels like the one answer that might answer the question, "Why not do the most obvious thing?"
1:52

Look, I know I'm harping on this a lot today, but I can't stop thinking about Occam's Razor here: Why are we not seriously considering that the reason we allegedly have mystery craft that defy the laws of physics but do not have physicists because "the one type of person who could possibly help with this" IS EXACTLY WHO THEY DON'T WANT? Imagine for a moment that they have a crime scene that they are assigning unqualified personnel to. Why would you do that? Because you're trying not to solve the the crime, only to make it LOOK like you are. Why would you not try to solve a crime? Because you already know who did it. But you go through the motions because you don't want anyone to know you know. That raises other questions, of course, like, "did they already solve it a long time ago?" or "did they not need to solve it because they were told how it works by whoever made it?" Maybe I'm wrong. But it feels like the one answer that might answer the question, "Why not do the most obvious thing?"

Steve Skojec

114,638 次观看 • 6 个月前

Eric Weinstein on UFO's: "There is definitely something there. I am worried they are multi temporal adversaries - Time travel. 🛸👽😱 “We have been too long in Einstein’s prison.” If general relativity is the last word, he says UAPs are probably 1960s nation state weapons. He does not think GR is the last word. “I’m worried about multi temporal adversaries.” Time may not be one dimensional. “If you meet an adversary who has access to multi-time, it’s like you’re trying to compete with them with an A-10 Warthog and you’ve got your only gun on a track, except with time rather than with space.” The speed of light is too brutal if Einstein stays in force. Go to Alpha Centauri and back near light speed and Earth is eight years older when you return. “Nobody wants to do that, and that’s just the first star.” He points to a real instrument. DESI at Kitt Peak in southern Arizona. He believes it will show the cosmological constant is not constant, that dark energy is written into Einstein’s equations with the wrong formula, and that the result is heading toward five sigma “if we aren’t there already.” The physics we teach may be a prison. A named experiment in Arizona is the lock he thinks is about to click.
3:56

Eric Weinstein on UFO's: "There is definitely something there. I am worried they are multi temporal adversaries - Time travel. 🛸👽😱 “We have been too long in Einstein’s prison.” If general relativity is the last word, he says UAPs are probably 1960s nation state weapons. He does not think GR is the last word. “I’m worried about multi temporal adversaries.” Time may not be one dimensional. “If you meet an adversary who has access to multi-time, it’s like you’re trying to compete with them with an A-10 Warthog and you’ve got your only gun on a track, except with time rather than with space.” The speed of light is too brutal if Einstein stays in force. Go to Alpha Centauri and back near light speed and Earth is eight years older when you return. “Nobody wants to do that, and that’s just the first star.” He points to a real instrument. DESI at Kitt Peak in southern Arizona. He believes it will show the cosmological constant is not constant, that dark energy is written into Einstein’s equations with the wrong formula, and that the result is heading toward five sigma “if we aren’t there already.” The physics we teach may be a prison. A named experiment in Arizona is the lock he thinks is about to click.

Interstellar

85,766 次观看 • 8 天前

Bob Lazar just told Joe Rogan that the UFO he saw at Area 51 was allegedly an “archaeological recovery” from deep underwater. And he suspects that aliens are not just be extraterrestrial. They’re more likely inter-dimensional. “You could hide an entire civilization in the ocean.” “What’s the deal with the ocean?” “That’s probably the number one question.” Rogan: “There’s a ton of sightings where people see things come out of the water and go into the water.” Lazar: “Yeah, there has to be a reason for that.” Rogan: “If they have the ability to travel through space, if whatever that thing is really does create some sort of a … space-time bubble—” Lazar: “But maybe it’s not space.” “Maybe it’s time, maybe it’s another dimension.” “There’s really no limits.” “If you can start manipulating physics in that way, you can bend time, you can open doorways into other dimensions.” Joe Rogan
3:52

Bob Lazar just told Joe Rogan that the UFO he saw at Area 51 was allegedly an “archaeological recovery” from deep underwater. And he suspects that aliens are not just be extraterrestrial. They’re more likely inter-dimensional. “You could hide an entire civilization in the ocean.” “What’s the deal with the ocean?” “That’s probably the number one question.” Rogan: “There’s a ton of sightings where people see things come out of the water and go into the water.” Lazar: “Yeah, there has to be a reason for that.” Rogan: “If they have the ability to travel through space, if whatever that thing is really does create some sort of a … space-time bubble—” Lazar: “But maybe it’s not space.” “Maybe it’s time, maybe it’s another dimension.” “There’s really no limits.” “If you can start manipulating physics in that way, you can bend time, you can open doorways into other dimensions.” Joe Rogan

Holden Culotta

851,581 次观看 • 5 个月前

It’s time to remind you that we have not forgotten. We don’t care how many lawyers you hire to go through the 5.2 million files. You were given 30 days and are currently in violation of US Federal law.
0:46

It’s time to remind you that we have not forgotten. We don’t care how many lawyers you hire to go through the 5.2 million files. You were given 30 days and are currently in violation of US Federal law.

MAGA Cult Slayer

769,060 次观看 • 8 个月前

🕰️ Make time your friend. Be the ancestor of your future happiness Poet David Whyte on 'How I Write' with David Perell: "All of us can remember a moment, a threshold moment in our existence where you picked up the phone or you went out the door or you put yourself out to have a conversation. You asked for a gift or funding for your work as you did, you know, and you were granted it. And if you hadn't have gone out the door, if you hadn't have picked up the phone, if you hadn't have asked, your life would be immeasurably impoverished today. So you could actually, well, you could actually go back to the person you were in that moment and thank yourself in a way as making a pilgrimage back to that moment." We imagine time is our enemy: "Time makes fools of us all" "I ran out of time" "There's not enough time in the day" Relating to time in this other way befriends it. Rather than cling to the moment, you jump into the flow of time and realize that now is the opportunity to be the ancestor of your future happiness. Now is the only time. What will you do today for your future happiness?
1:14

🕰️ Make time your friend. Be the ancestor of your future happiness Poet David Whyte on 'How I Write' with David Perell: "All of us can remember a moment, a threshold moment in our existence where you picked up the phone or you went out the door or you put yourself out to have a conversation. You asked for a gift or funding for your work as you did, you know, and you were granted it. And if you hadn't have gone out the door, if you hadn't have picked up the phone, if you hadn't have asked, your life would be immeasurably impoverished today. So you could actually, well, you could actually go back to the person you were in that moment and thank yourself in a way as making a pilgrimage back to that moment." We imagine time is our enemy: "Time makes fools of us all" "I ran out of time" "There's not enough time in the day" Relating to time in this other way befriends it. Rather than cling to the moment, you jump into the flow of time and realize that now is the opportunity to be the ancestor of your future happiness. Now is the only time. What will you do today for your future happiness?

Dan McAteer

13,608 次观看 • 1 年前

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that Wichita Lineman has to be one of the best written songs of that era or love songs in general! And you know, that's saying a lot because there are so many that have stood the test of time! What song has lyrics and a melody that just grab you each time you hear it?
0:44

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that Wichita Lineman has to be one of the best written songs of that era or love songs in general! And you know, that's saying a lot because there are so many that have stood the test of time! What song has lyrics and a melody that just grab you each time you hear it?

Croxxed Out

18,446 次观看 • 3 个月前

Dwyane Wade says 99.9% of the time, a player has to go through pain of losing before celebration, but Wemby can be that 0.1% 😳 “99.9% of the time I do [believe a player has to go through pain], but every so often, it’s a special motherf*cker that comes around and a special team that comes around that they don’t have to experience it.”
1:12

Dwyane Wade says 99.9% of the time, a player has to go through pain of losing before celebration, but Wemby can be that 0.1% 😳 “99.9% of the time I do [believe a player has to go through pain], but every so often, it’s a special motherf*cker that comes around and a special team that comes around that they don’t have to experience it.”

Wy Network by Dwyane Wade

57,655 次观看 • 3 个月前

Michael P. Masters: Time travel is possible, but maybe only back about 60,000 years because of time dilation. 👽🛸 On Joe Rogan he laid out why so called aliens may be us from the future. He cited the Dan Burisch account of J-Rod: “We are you from the future and we’re from about 55 to 60,000 years in your future.” He also pointed to Jim Penniston’s regression: they can only go 40 to 60,000 years into the past or they might not get back. Those limits, plus the physics of high speed travel and time dilation, are why Masters says you could not go back 65 million years to hunt dinosaurs. Future humans would return to this era to collect unmanipulated genetic material and try to fix reproductive problems created by later genetic engineering. He argues the electromagnetic force, about 10 to the 40th times stronger than gravity, is what they use both to fly and to warp spacetime. A spacetime bubble around the craft would let them move fast relative to us while slowing time outside it, which is why they can appear, vanish, and stay hard to track. Joe Rogan called it a crazy level of technological sophistication: going back in time and somehow not wrecking the timeline that leads to you.
1:59

Michael P. Masters: Time travel is possible, but maybe only back about 60,000 years because of time dilation. 👽🛸 On Joe Rogan he laid out why so called aliens may be us from the future. He cited the Dan Burisch account of J-Rod: “We are you from the future and we’re from about 55 to 60,000 years in your future.” He also pointed to Jim Penniston’s regression: they can only go 40 to 60,000 years into the past or they might not get back. Those limits, plus the physics of high speed travel and time dilation, are why Masters says you could not go back 65 million years to hunt dinosaurs. Future humans would return to this era to collect unmanipulated genetic material and try to fix reproductive problems created by later genetic engineering. He argues the electromagnetic force, about 10 to the 40th times stronger than gravity, is what they use both to fly and to warp spacetime. A spacetime bubble around the craft would let them move fast relative to us while slowing time outside it, which is why they can appear, vanish, and stay hard to track. Joe Rogan called it a crazy level of technological sophistication: going back in time and somehow not wrecking the timeline that leads to you.

Interstellar

65,500 次观看 • 3 天前

Okay frogan , You totally weren't properly notified of the lawsuit, lol. You had an entire year to respond to the lawsuit, but you are so incompetent that you could not even do that with all this time on your hands because you are unemployed one. Anyways, I am off to my job, because I have a sense of responsibility as a grown ass woman. lol
1:01

Okay frogan , You totally weren't properly notified of the lawsuit, lol. You had an entire year to respond to the lawsuit, but you are so incompetent that you could not even do that with all this time on your hands because you are unemployed one. Anyways, I am off to my job, because I have a sense of responsibility as a grown ass woman. lol

Leigha Sapienti

51,736 次观看 • 3 个月前

Elon Musk on why we'll find a galaxy full of long-dead civilizations that never left home "I suspect that if we are able to go out there and explore other star systems, there's a good chance we find a whole bunch of long-dead one-planet civilizations that never made it past their home planet" "There are various explanations for the Fermi Paradox. One is these great filters which civilizations don't pass through. One of those great filters is: do you become a multiplanet civilization or not?" "If you don't, it's simply a matter of time before something happens on your planet, either natural or man-made, that causes us to die out. Like the dinosaurs. Where are they now? They didn't have spaceships"
0:53

Elon Musk on why we'll find a galaxy full of long-dead civilizations that never left home "I suspect that if we are able to go out there and explore other star systems, there's a good chance we find a whole bunch of long-dead one-planet civilizations that never made it past their home planet" "There are various explanations for the Fermi Paradox. One is these great filters which civilizations don't pass through. One of those great filters is: do you become a multiplanet civilization or not?" "If you don't, it's simply a matter of time before something happens on your planet, either natural or man-made, that causes us to die out. Like the dinosaurs. Where are they now? They didn't have spaceships"

Jaynit

113,193 次观看 • 1 个月前

Sam Presti defines the real goal of leadership “In this job as a leader, what you want to do is build teams that you wish you could have been a part of.” “We talk about our seasons as chapters. In order to best understand your story, you need to see it horizontally, not vertically.” “Every year, our goal is to repeat a process—not chase an outcome. The process is to position our team and organization so that, if we are fortunate enough to have things break our way, we can achieve ultimate success.” “What makes great teams lasting isn’t that they defeated their opponents. It’s that they also defeated the circumstances that stood in their way during their journey.” “We have a chance to be a team that makes our mark over time. But we will not make our singular mark every single time.” “That’s just not how this works. NBA history tells us there are no final victories.”
2:13

Sam Presti defines the real goal of leadership “In this job as a leader, what you want to do is build teams that you wish you could have been a part of.” “We talk about our seasons as chapters. In order to best understand your story, you need to see it horizontally, not vertically.” “Every year, our goal is to repeat a process—not chase an outcome. The process is to position our team and organization so that, if we are fortunate enough to have things break our way, we can achieve ultimate success.” “What makes great teams lasting isn’t that they defeated their opponents. It’s that they also defeated the circumstances that stood in their way during their journey.” “We have a chance to be a team that makes our mark over time. But we will not make our singular mark every single time.” “That’s just not how this works. NBA history tells us there are no final victories.”

Josh Chambers

228,758 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jordan Peterson just named the one thing no machine will ever possess. Not intelligence. Not logic. Not processing power. A ghost. Peterson reached back to Carl Jung to describe something most people never slow down long enough to feel. You are not just the person sitting here reading this. You are every version of yourself that could ever exist across time. Peterson: “The Self is everything you are and everything you could be across time.” There is a version of you that fulfilled every ounce of potential you carry. The finished version. The one standing at the far end of your life who became everything you were built to become. That version is not a fantasy. It is a gravitational field. And it has been speaking to you your entire life. Not through words. Not through logic. Through the feeling of meaning. Peterson: “The answer is through the instinct of meaning.” When something resonates so deep it stops you mid-step and you cannot explain why. That is not a chemical accident. That is your future self reaching backward through time whispering where to walk next. Peterson: “That which you could be tells you where to walk by making that path meaningful.” Your potential is not quiet. It is dragging you forward every single day through a language older than speech. Now look at what we are building. Machines designed to optimize every human decision. Career paths. Schedules. Relationships. Health. Creativity. The algorithm will map the most efficient route to any destination you name. But it cannot exist across time. It has no unrealized potential. No future version of itself standing at any finish line. No ghost pulling it toward something it was meant to become. It has compute. It does not have a soul whispering directions. When you hand your choices to an algorithm you are not delegating a task. You are muting the only compass that was ever yours. Meaning is not efficient. It is not optimized. It does not care about the shortest path. Meaning requires friction. Confusion. Standing in total darkness and feeling your way forward on nothing but instinct. That is the entire point. The struggle is not the obstacle between you and your potential. The struggle is the conversation between you and your potential. Remove it and you do not arrive faster. You arrive as someone else. We are building the most powerful optimization engine in human history. And we are about to aim it directly at the one process that was never supposed to be optimized. The algorithm will hand you a perfect map. But it will never give you a reason to walk.
0:57

Jordan Peterson just named the one thing no machine will ever possess. Not intelligence. Not logic. Not processing power. A ghost. Peterson reached back to Carl Jung to describe something most people never slow down long enough to feel. You are not just the person sitting here reading this. You are every version of yourself that could ever exist across time. Peterson: “The Self is everything you are and everything you could be across time.” There is a version of you that fulfilled every ounce of potential you carry. The finished version. The one standing at the far end of your life who became everything you were built to become. That version is not a fantasy. It is a gravitational field. And it has been speaking to you your entire life. Not through words. Not through logic. Through the feeling of meaning. Peterson: “The answer is through the instinct of meaning.” When something resonates so deep it stops you mid-step and you cannot explain why. That is not a chemical accident. That is your future self reaching backward through time whispering where to walk next. Peterson: “That which you could be tells you where to walk by making that path meaningful.” Your potential is not quiet. It is dragging you forward every single day through a language older than speech. Now look at what we are building. Machines designed to optimize every human decision. Career paths. Schedules. Relationships. Health. Creativity. The algorithm will map the most efficient route to any destination you name. But it cannot exist across time. It has no unrealized potential. No future version of itself standing at any finish line. No ghost pulling it toward something it was meant to become. It has compute. It does not have a soul whispering directions. When you hand your choices to an algorithm you are not delegating a task. You are muting the only compass that was ever yours. Meaning is not efficient. It is not optimized. It does not care about the shortest path. Meaning requires friction. Confusion. Standing in total darkness and feeling your way forward on nothing but instinct. That is the entire point. The struggle is not the obstacle between you and your potential. The struggle is the conversation between you and your potential. Remove it and you do not arrive faster. You arrive as someone else. We are building the most powerful optimization engine in human history. And we are about to aim it directly at the one process that was never supposed to be optimized. The algorithm will hand you a perfect map. But it will never give you a reason to walk.

Dustin

40,866 次观看 • 4 个月前

“Failure is so much more interesting than success. And it always saddens me that school doesn't teach that. At school the thing is to be brilliant and to get the answer right first time. And there are brilliant people who could do that, but for the rest of us who are not brilliant, we have to strive, and we have to go through failure. And we realize that you don't get it right the first time or the second time. In my case and I counted it. It took 5,127 times. With failure you question it “Well why did it go wrong?” And actually the reason it goes wrong is often very, very interesting. Where something works you say “Great that worked.” You don't even stop to wonder why it works. So if you've got to enjoy failure.” —James Dyson
0:46

“Failure is so much more interesting than success. And it always saddens me that school doesn't teach that. At school the thing is to be brilliant and to get the answer right first time. And there are brilliant people who could do that, but for the rest of us who are not brilliant, we have to strive, and we have to go through failure. And we realize that you don't get it right the first time or the second time. In my case and I counted it. It took 5,127 times. With failure you question it “Well why did it go wrong?” And actually the reason it goes wrong is often very, very interesting. Where something works you say “Great that worked.” You don't even stop to wonder why it works. So if you've got to enjoy failure.” —James Dyson

David Senra

55,812 次观看 • 2 个月前