Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

‼️Erika Kirk Issues Statement CELEBRATING Judges Decision In Tyler Robinson Hearing As “JUSTICE” — After A Year Of Attacking ANYONE Asking Questions In Pursuit Of The TRUTH.🤯 A Utah judge found probable cause. That is not a conviction. That is the lowest bar in the case, viewed in the... light most favorable to the state. Tyler Robinson pleaded not guilty. Erika Kirk went straight to X and called it an important step in her family’s pursuit of justice, then wrapped it in the children who will grow up without their father. The statement is designed to end the conversation. It should start one. For months she has not acted like a widow who wants every fact on the table. She has acted like a narrator who needs one ending. Journalists who pointed at holes in the official story got smeared, copyright-struck, and treated like enemies of Charlie instead of people trying to find who actually killed him. You do not hunt the truth by punishing the people collecting receipts. You do not hunt the truth by needing Tyler Robinson guilty before a jury has heard a full defense. Probable cause is not proof. A press release is not evidence. If this were about justice she would welcome the questions, release the records, and stop using victim status to rush a narrative that still does not add up. Charlie’s name is not a shield for a cover story. His kids deserve the real killer — not a slogan and a fast conviction.show more

Project Constitution

296,976 subscribers

21,888 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

19 Kommentare

Profilbild von 13thArtist

13thArtistvor 10 Tagen

CHARLIE KIRK championed asking questions: "Be skeptical of everything, especially your government. Ask questions, fight for your rights, and never surrender." In his final interview, he said, "You better keep asking questions, because it's the only thing that keeps us free".

Profilbild von Tom Sawyer

Tom Sawyervor 11 Tagen

Anyone Drawing Conclusions about the Judge’s Decision, Today, in the Charlie Kirk Trial, is IGNORANT & ENGAGEMENT FARMING!

Profilbild von KCNYC

KCNYCvor 11 Tagen

Are they really celebrating? Grok satire

Profilbild von Jane Thomas

Jane Thomasvor 11 Tagen

Fox News just feeds the fed slop to its viewers

Profilbild von 🔥🔥🔥PURE BLOOD🔥🔥🔥END THE FED🔥🔥🔥

🔥🔥🔥PURE BLOOD🔥🔥🔥END THE FED🔥🔥🔥vor 11 Tagen

Because he’s white and likely didn’t do it but they need to prove they can frame and extinguish whites.

Profilbild von I Know What You Did

I Know What You Didvor 11 Tagen

We should now be asking why a CHRISTIAN organization is wanting DEATH so bad? 🤔

Profilbild von Madame Mitzpah

Madame Mitzpahvor 11 Tagen

Whore of Babylon

Profilbild von Matthew

Matthewvor 11 Tagen

A fucking cunt‼️🖕🧃

Profilbild von wm r hutchens

wm r hutchensvor 10 Tagen

the fbi allowed her to keep important evidence in what should have been but wasn't an investigation. i think they both know who killed charlie and it was not tyler

Profilbild von Facts shmacks

Facts shmacksvor 10 Tagen

"Asking questions in the pursuit of truth" is a euphemism for: Onlookers trying to inject themselves personally into the case so they feel some self worth, but have zero access to the evidence so they have nothing but theories that would be destroyed with access to the evidence.

Profilbild von Oluksak

Oluksakvor 11 Tagen

Bro, just stop. The only question now is whether TR gets the death penalty. You’re making it more likely he will because if the state lets him plead guilty to non-aggravated murder, crazies like you will say is part of the Fed plan. You will have his blood on your hands.

Profilbild von 13thArtist

13thArtistvor 10 Tagen

It is against American values to ignore the fundamental right of the innocent till proven guilty! That doesn't mean you are disgracing Charlie's legacy or that you believe one narrative over the other. It means that you stand for the core idea of what it means to be an American.

Profilbild von WooHooKat

WooHooKatvor 10 Tagen

TPUSA to Celebrate 1st anniversary of the Charlie Kirk Moose Hunting event w/Special Guest Butch Mountain Man Hibbs recounting his story of Courage Tenacity and coolness in the middle of a panicked crowd, in what some call the shot of a lifetime! Tickets on sale Hablamos Espanol

Profilbild von Simon Ahearn

Simon Ahearnvor 10 Tagen

FOX = CIA

Profilbild von USA

USAvor 11 Tagen

She’s needs to stfu

Profilbild von Colton boward

Colton bowardvor 10 Tagen

It doesn't matter dude. Theyre going to convict him, and the 90% of people that dont actually care are going to forget and move on. There will be a select few that will always claim foul play, and theyll be dismissed as crazy. Like 911 , or flat earth the same.

Profilbild von Just a Dude

Just a Dudevor 11 Tagen

Theatre!

Profilbild von RA-blsdbyndmsre

RA-blsdbyndmsrevor 11 Tagen

Everyone handles grief different. That makes her guilty? Judgemental hacks!

Profilbild von Helena

Helenavor 10 Tagen

She is such a fraud

Ähnliche Videos

WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany goes nuclear on Utah Judge Tony Graff delaying his decision on whether Tyler Robinson goes to trial in Charlie Kirk's murder until September... "This is mind-blowing. Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution and that allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? "The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant." Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to that family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial -- a litany of other rights." "But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar. To your point, ballistic evidence, DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's that roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed? You can't make a decision on the pleat of Tyler Robinson? We're not even going to get his plea until a year when Charlie Kirk was assassinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial into until a year from when Charlie was assassinated?" "This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it."

WATCH: Kayleigh McEnany goes nuclear on Utah Judge Tony Graff delaying his decision on whether Tyler Robinson goes to trial in Charlie Kirk's murder until September... "This is mind-blowing. Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution and that allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? "The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant." Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to that family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial -- a litany of other rights." "But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar. To your point, ballistic evidence, DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's that roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed? You can't make a decision on the pleat of Tyler Robinson? We're not even going to get his plea until a year when Charlie Kirk was assassinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial into until a year from when Charlie was assassinated?" "This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it."

Curtis Houck

277,771 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

JUST IN: Judge Tony Graf rules that prosecutors may seek the death penalty for Tyler Robinson. "Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, this evidence is sufficient at this stage to support a reasonable belief that the defendant is the individual who shot and killed Charlie Kirk," Graf said. "Accordingly, the state has demonstrated probable cause as to the identity and homicide elements of count one."

JUST IN: Judge Tony Graf rules that prosecutors may seek the death penalty for Tyler Robinson. "Viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, this evidence is sufficient at this stage to support a reasonable belief that the defendant is the individual who shot and killed Charlie Kirk," Graf said. "Accordingly, the state has demonstrated probable cause as to the identity and homicide elements of count one."

Collin Rugg

101,671 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

Kayleigh McEnany SLAPS AROUND Utah Judge Tony Graff for REFUSING to rule on whether there is sufficient evidence for Tyler Robinson to stand trial for the ass*ssination of Charlie Kirk until September. “This is mind-blowing… This is inexcusable. I am angry about it.” “Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution, which allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah Code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? ‘The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant.’” “Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to her family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial — a litany of other rights. But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar.” “There’s ballistic evidence, there’s DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's the roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed?… We're not even going to get his plea until a year after Charlie Kirk was ass*ssinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial until a year from when Charlie was ass*ssinated?” “This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it.”

Kayleigh McEnany SLAPS AROUND Utah Judge Tony Graff for REFUSING to rule on whether there is sufficient evidence for Tyler Robinson to stand trial for the assssination of Charlie Kirk until September. “This is mind-blowing… This is inexcusable. I am angry about it.” “Judge Tony Graff yesterday cited Article I, Section 28 of the Utah Constitution, which allows Erika Kirk and family to be treated with respect, with dignity, to be free from harassment, to be informed, and present at the trial. But I would love for him to cite Utah Code 773872. You know what that gives Erika Kirk and her family? ‘The right to a speedy disposition of the charges, free from unwarranted delay caused by or at the behest of the defendant.’” “Where's Judge Tony Graff's affinity for that statue? Because you are not giving that to Erika Kirk. You are not giving that to her family. Yes, the defendant has Sixth Amendment rights to a speedy trial — a litany of other rights. But the fact that this is not going to be decided until September, there's no decision on probable cause? Probable cause is such a low bar.” “There’s ballistic evidence, there’s DNA evidence, there's a texted conviction, there's the roommate saying he confessed, there's a litany of evidence, and she doesn't get a probable cause decision until September, nearly a year after Charlie was killed?… We're not even going to get his plea until a year after Charlie Kirk was assssinated? We're not going to know if this goes to trial until a year from when Charlie was ass*ssinated?” “This is inexcusable. I am angry about it. On average in this country, a defendant enters a plea 24 to 48 hours after an arrest. Tyler Robinson has been arrested for nearly a year, and the fact that we would not know this until a year, Utah might as well rip up your statute about the speedy disposition for the victim, because Erik Kirk is being denied that, and I am quite angry about it.”

RedWave Press

74,739 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

IF TYLER ROBINSON “CONFESSED,” WHY IS HE PLEADING NOT GUILTY? Tyler Robinson has pleaded not guilty, and his case could now move toward trial. TPUSA talking points want the public to believe Robinson repeatedly confessed. But if those alleged confessions are real, why enter a not-guilty plea? Would any of those statements hold up in a court of law? Questions also remain about Lance Twigg and his reported special immunity. What does that arrangement mean for the case, and what evidence does the prosecution actually have against Robinson? Baron Coleman joins us to examine whether this case is headed for trial, the alleged confessions, the immunity question, and whether prosecutors can prove their claims in court.

IF TYLER ROBINSON “CONFESSED,” WHY IS HE PLEADING NOT GUILTY? Tyler Robinson has pleaded not guilty, and his case could now move toward trial. TPUSA talking points want the public to believe Robinson repeatedly confessed. But if those alleged confessions are real, why enter a not-guilty plea? Would any of those statements hold up in a court of law? Questions also remain about Lance Twigg and his reported special immunity. What does that arrangement mean for the case, and what evidence does the prosecution actually have against Robinson? Baron Coleman joins us to examine whether this case is headed for trial, the alleged confessions, the immunity question, and whether prosecutors can prove their claims in court.

Redacted

16,349 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

🚨 TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet just described the excruciating emotional toll on Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his family as they face accused killer Tyler Robinson in court for the first time, and honestly it is hard to even imagine that kind of pain. This family is being forced to relive the worst day of their lives inside a courtroom while prosecutors present evidence and supporters, including Donald Trump Jr., stand with them in solidarity. Erika Kirk should not have to carry this burden alone, and the fact that she is showing up with that kind of strength says everything about her courage and faith. This is not just another headline. This is a grieving family, a movement still in shock, and a reminder that justice must be served fully, publicly, and without excuses. Pray for Erika, pray for Charlie’s family, and pray that truth and justice prevail. 🙏

🚨 TPUSA spokesman Andrew Kolvet just described the excruciating emotional toll on Charlie Kirk’s widow, Erika, and his family as they face accused killer Tyler Robinson in court for the first time, and honestly it is hard to even imagine that kind of pain. This family is being forced to relive the worst day of their lives inside a courtroom while prosecutors present evidence and supporters, including Donald Trump Jr., stand with them in solidarity. Erika Kirk should not have to carry this burden alone, and the fact that she is showing up with that kind of strength says everything about her courage and faith. This is not just another headline. This is a grieving family, a movement still in shock, and a reminder that justice must be served fully, publicly, and without excuses. Pray for Erika, pray for Charlie’s family, and pray that truth and justice prevail. 🙏

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

39,918 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Everyone who supports Erika Kirk is a rabid pro-Zionist. 👀 Everyone who thinks Tyler Robinson is guilty and should get the death penalty is a rabid pro-Zionist. 💥 If that's the case, it really raises the question of who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why? If you’re not following Baron Coleman, you’re missing out on a lot!

Everyone who supports Erika Kirk is a rabid pro-Zionist. 👀 Everyone who thinks Tyler Robinson is guilty and should get the death penalty is a rabid pro-Zionist. 💥 If that's the case, it really raises the question of who killed Charlie Kirk, how, and why? If you’re not following Baron Coleman, you’re missing out on a lot!

Travis

37,409 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🚨Tyler Robinson turned himself in the night after Charlie Kirk was killed. Who you are is the move you make when the room is quiet. Presenting yourself to police after a man is dead is not a vibe. It is responsibility with a body attached. Tyler Robinson chose to turn himself in. That choice is the verdict I use.

🚨Tyler Robinson turned himself in the night after Charlie Kirk was killed. Who you are is the move you make when the room is quiet. Presenting yourself to police after a man is dead is not a vibe. It is responsibility with a body attached. Tyler Robinson chose to turn himself in. That choice is the verdict I use.

Grace Ashford

27,925 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

‼️Blake Neff’s BOMBSHELL Hospital Admission — They Were Already Talking About Candace's REACTION While Charlie Was In The Hospital 😱 Blake Neff just sat with Deseret News for a one-year profile and volunteered the weirdest detail of the week. He says he was in the waiting room at the Orem hospital after Charlie was taken to Timpanogos, and the conversation was not who did this. It was how Candace Owens would react. Someone said she would have an extreme reaction. Blake says he answered instantly: yeah, she will. Then he wrapped it in her France reporting and “weird stuff about Jewish cults” and Turning Point cooling on her in 2024. Sit with that. It is the middle of a manhunt. Nobody has a shooter, a motive, or a story yet. Blake has known Charlie about a year and a half. He has never met Candace. He is in Arizona. She is in Tennessee. And the first named thought he wants on the record from that waiting room is her. Not Charlie’s last texts. Not who his enemies were. Not the rooftop. Not the jet. Not the second Denali. Candace. That is why this lands like foreknowledge of the narrative, not grief. They were already sure the official story would be simple and already sure she would not swallow it. He will not name who said it. He develops amnesia around the same names. He talks too much because he wants to be the star of a year he cannot account for. They were worried about her in that hospital for a reason. She still will not bend the knee to the cookie-cutter rooftop. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

95,576 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen

Tyler Robinson DEFINITELY DID NOT kill Charlie Kirk. He is a PATSY, just like I said from the beginning. The “bullet” that supposedly hit Charlie in the neck DOES NOT match the rifle said to be shot by Robinson. Then, the police officer who served for 30 years that supposedly “forced” a confession out of Robinson just quit, right as the aforementioned fact came to light. Really? You don’t say. That is some CRAZY timing…

Tyler Robinson DEFINITELY DID NOT kill Charlie Kirk. He is a PATSY, just like I said from the beginning. The “bullet” that supposedly hit Charlie in the neck DOES NOT match the rifle said to be shot by Robinson. Then, the police officer who served for 30 years that supposedly “forced” a confession out of Robinson just quit, right as the aforementioned fact came to light. Really? You don’t say. That is some CRAZY timing…

The Patriot Voice

77,096 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: Erika Kirk is now making a major demand in a new court motion, and honestly who can blame her after everything her family has been forced to endure. Charlie Kirk’s widow should not have to sit back quietly while lawyers, procedure, delays, and courtroom games drag this nightmare out like it is just another case file. This is a grieving wife, a family shattered, and a movement that watched one of its strongest voices get taken from them in broad daylight. Erika has shown unbelievable strength through hearings, evidence, and the pain of facing accused killer Tyler Robinson, but strength does not mean silence. She has every right to demand accountability, transparency, and justice without excuses. The country is watching, the family deserves answers, and the court should remember that behind every motion is a real family still living with the loss.

🚨 BREAKING: Erika Kirk is now making a major demand in a new court motion, and honestly who can blame her after everything her family has been forced to endure. Charlie Kirk’s widow should not have to sit back quietly while lawyers, procedure, delays, and courtroom games drag this nightmare out like it is just another case file. This is a grieving wife, a family shattered, and a movement that watched one of its strongest voices get taken from them in broad daylight. Erika has shown unbelievable strength through hearings, evidence, and the pain of facing accused killer Tyler Robinson, but strength does not mean silence. She has every right to demand accountability, transparency, and justice without excuses. The country is watching, the family deserves answers, and the court should remember that behind every motion is a real family still living with the loss.

ⁿᵉʷˢ Barron Trump 🇺🇸

126,209 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

‼️BUSTED: The State Got Caught SNEAKING-IN New Evidence During Closing Arguments In Yesterday's Tyler Robinson Hearing — The Defense IMMEDIATELY Called Them Out 👀 The state got five days to put on a case. When that was over, the record was closed. Yesterday the state got caught trying to insert new evidence regarding safety standards from a Provo shooting range that were not previously added as evidence. In their reply brief and again at the podium they started citing things that were never admitted — including safety standards from a Provo shooting range that was not in evidence at the preliminary hearing. The defense immediately called them out for this. That is not argument. That is a backdoor evidence dump. Counsel was blunt. The state had every chance to put on guns, gun-safety specifics, physics, and probabilities. It did not. It does not get another bite at the apple through a brief or a closing. A judge deciding probable cause is supposed to weigh only what was actually placed into the record in court, not what a prosecutor wishes he had proved after the fact. Argument is not testimony. A citation in a reply is not an exhibit. They asked the court to stay inside the record. That is the whole point of holding a 5 day long evidentiary process. If the official story needed range rules and extra science, those belonged in July with a witness under oath — not in September as a sneak. RT and watch the FULL hearing linked below.

‼️BUSTED: The State Got Caught SNEAKING-IN New Evidence During Closing Arguments In Yesterday's Tyler Robinson Hearing — The Defense IMMEDIATELY Called Them Out 👀 The state got five days to put on a case. When that was over, the record was closed. Yesterday the state got caught trying to insert new evidence regarding safety standards from a Provo shooting range that were not previously added as evidence. In their reply brief and again at the podium they started citing things that were never admitted — including safety standards from a Provo shooting range that was not in evidence at the preliminary hearing. The defense immediately called them out for this. That is not argument. That is a backdoor evidence dump. Counsel was blunt. The state had every chance to put on guns, gun-safety specifics, physics, and probabilities. It did not. It does not get another bite at the apple through a brief or a closing. A judge deciding probable cause is supposed to weigh only what was actually placed into the record in court, not what a prosecutor wishes he had proved after the fact. Argument is not testimony. A citation in a reply is not an exhibit. They asked the court to stay inside the record. That is the whole point of holding a 5 day long evidentiary process. If the official story needed range rules and extra science, those belonged in July with a witness under oath — not in September as a sneak. RT and watch the FULL hearing linked below.

Project Constitution

90,790 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen

Madison Police shot and killed a man on a bike today after knocking him to the ground, tasing and kicking him. A crowd continues to grow in outrage as the people demand transparency and justice for the victim, whose name has not yet been released. The people have not forgotten Tony Robinson, an unarmed teenager killed by MPD in the same place 11 years ago. As MPDs use the same tactics to cover up and distort the truth, we see through it! We demand the truth and we demand justice!

Madison Police shot and killed a man on a bike today after knocking him to the ground, tasing and kicking him. A crowd continues to grow in outrage as the people demand transparency and justice for the victim, whose name has not yet been released. The people have not forgotten Tony Robinson, an unarmed teenager killed by MPD in the same place 11 years ago. As MPDs use the same tactics to cover up and distort the truth, we see through it! We demand the truth and we demand justice!

Party for Socialism and Liberation

10,395 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

THOSE CHILDREN ARE THE VICTIMS. Not Lindsay Clancy. Not the defense. Not the pink-ribbon mob outside the courthouse. She murdered her kids. At minimum she belongs in prison for the rest of her miserable life. Hundreds of women in pink treating her like a martyr is not compassion. That is suicidal empathy, and every one of them needs a hard look in the mirror. We said it straight on my podcast. Stop losing the plot, talk about the children. Justice denied is cruelty to the victims.

THOSE CHILDREN ARE THE VICTIMS. Not Lindsay Clancy. Not the defense. Not the pink-ribbon mob outside the courthouse. She murdered her kids. At minimum she belongs in prison for the rest of her miserable life. Hundreds of women in pink treating her like a martyr is not compassion. That is suicidal empathy, and every one of them needs a hard look in the mirror. We said it straight on my podcast. Stop losing the plot, talk about the children. Justice denied is cruelty to the victims.

Gunther Eagleman™

52,607 Aufrufe • vor 23 Stunden

JD Vance slams Candace Owens and others attacking Erika Kirk for blaming her for Charlie Kirk's murder. "The people telling you Erika wasn't grieving are full of shit and we need to be honest about that fact." "To say that Erika Kirk wasn't grieving her husband on that day, to say that Erika Kirk was somehow complicit in it is so preposterous, and so disgusting, and it's one of the things that has broken the American public conversation in the last six months." "If you're one of the people going after Erika Kirk and not the people who are trying to destroy the United States of America, you're part of the problem and not part of the solution."

JD Vance slams Candace Owens and others attacking Erika Kirk for blaming her for Charlie Kirk's murder. "The people telling you Erika wasn't grieving are full of shit and we need to be honest about that fact." "To say that Erika Kirk wasn't grieving her husband on that day, to say that Erika Kirk was somehow complicit in it is so preposterous, and so disgusting, and it's one of the things that has broken the American public conversation in the last six months." "If you're one of the people going after Erika Kirk and not the people who are trying to destroy the United States of America, you're part of the problem and not part of the solution."

Ian Miles

111,721 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

🚨 If Erika Kirk ever cared about Charlie Kirk, she would be publicly sounding the alarm. Last night, Candace Owens released unedited footage that is substantially better quality than the footage provided by authorities in the case against Tyler Robinson. This exclusive, high-quality footage, obtained from an anonymous government source, should have vindicated the official narrative against Tyler Robinson. However, it failed to do so. The person in the footage bears no resemblance to Tyler Robinson. Baron Coleman and many others are more convinced than ever that Tyler Robinson is being framed for the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The man in the footage is not skinny; he appears far more muscular and robust than Tyler Robinson. The man by all metrics appears to be left-handed. He even put an earpiece in his left ear. This isn't 2005; who wears an earpiece in public?! You can clearly see that the man is wearing white leggings or thigh-high white socks under his shorts. Authorities never mentioned leggings or thigh-high socks. Furthermore, it’s quite possible that a ponytail could be hiding underneath his hat, considering the way he’s wearing it. Why is this of interest? Lance Twiggs, Tyler’s roommate whose less degraded DNA was found on every piece of evidence against Tyler Robinson, has a ponytail. Why didn’t our government release this high-quality footage, which is obviously available? Why does it seem that authorities deliberately degraded the footage presented in court? Why is this evidence coming from not only a podcaster but also a pregnant mother of four who works out of her basement in Nashville, Tennessee? Why are TPUSA and Erika Kirk completely silent?! Why aren't Erika Kirk, Andrew Kolvet, and Tyler Bowyer on Fox News asking what the hell is going on here?! Everyone should be demanding answers for who actually killed Charlie Kirk, but Erika Kirk and every individual at TPUSA should be at the forefront of demanding answers for this blatant and evident failure of our law enforcement institutions.

🚨 If Erika Kirk ever cared about Charlie Kirk, she would be publicly sounding the alarm. Last night, Candace Owens released unedited footage that is substantially better quality than the footage provided by authorities in the case against Tyler Robinson. This exclusive, high-quality footage, obtained from an anonymous government source, should have vindicated the official narrative against Tyler Robinson. However, it failed to do so. The person in the footage bears no resemblance to Tyler Robinson. Baron Coleman and many others are more convinced than ever that Tyler Robinson is being framed for the assassination of Charlie Kirk. The man in the footage is not skinny; he appears far more muscular and robust than Tyler Robinson. The man by all metrics appears to be left-handed. He even put an earpiece in his left ear. This isn't 2005; who wears an earpiece in public?! You can clearly see that the man is wearing white leggings or thigh-high white socks under his shorts. Authorities never mentioned leggings or thigh-high socks. Furthermore, it’s quite possible that a ponytail could be hiding underneath his hat, considering the way he’s wearing it. Why is this of interest? Lance Twiggs, Tyler’s roommate whose less degraded DNA was found on every piece of evidence against Tyler Robinson, has a ponytail. Why didn’t our government release this high-quality footage, which is obviously available? Why does it seem that authorities deliberately degraded the footage presented in court? Why is this evidence coming from not only a podcaster but also a pregnant mother of four who works out of her basement in Nashville, Tennessee? Why are TPUSA and Erika Kirk completely silent?! Why aren't Erika Kirk, Andrew Kolvet, and Tyler Bowyer on Fox News asking what the hell is going on here?! Everyone should be demanding answers for who actually killed Charlie Kirk, but Erika Kirk and every individual at TPUSA should be at the forefront of demanding answers for this blatant and evident failure of our law enforcement institutions.

Travis

105,243 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

Del Bigtree

147,529 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.

LOLO

3,072,798 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

To the Iranian people: Stand firm. Do not bow, and do not take a single step back. In Washington, Trump is in a dilemma. He wanted a quick war and a show of force, but the truth is clear: the American people do not want this war, and even within the military there are those who refuse to sacrifice their lives in a conflict that is not theirs. They thought Iran would tremble… But today, it is Washington’s arrogance that is trembling.

To the Iranian people: Stand firm. Do not bow, and do not take a single step back. In Washington, Trump is in a dilemma. He wanted a quick war and a show of force, but the truth is clear: the American people do not want this war, and even within the military there are those who refuse to sacrifice their lives in a conflict that is not theirs. They thought Iran would tremble… But today, it is Washington’s arrogance that is trembling.

SilencedSirs◼️

81,776 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten