Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Escape Challenge | Will she get her freedom? *100% consensual fantasy #escapechallenge #whiteblouse #猿轡 #secretary #DID #damsel #ElegantStyle #highheels *Original frame Fabrizio Sandoli 👍

13,185 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

How to build chemistry in seconds: This is a great example of challenging, What challenging does is maintain the tension, it’s “fighting for position” Which really, what you’re avoiding is collapsing into her frame. She is trying to prize frame herself. “You wish you had this number” A lot of guys either collapse into her frame “Yeah I do, what’s your number” Or they just outright deny “No I don’t” Both suboptimal. You want to deny without qualifying yourself. Tease her back - “You’re mumbling I can’t even understand you” “Numbah?” “What’s a numbah?” Misinterpret “What you said you want my number? You can’t have it yet” Reframing the interaction knocks her off the pedestal without triggering her, or coming across try hard. What he did was perfect. Next, “Why are you getting so close to me” He’s challenging her prize frame, starting shit for more tension. “I didn’t give you permission. Stop touching my titties” Guys are gonna be like wtf is wrong with his voice But the intent and frame of your words matter more than the base. (Though a good voice still helps) “You like me already” Prize framing himself. But it’s also just him expressing his observation. “Yeah you wish I liked you” The girl now challenging the prize frame. And instead of going back and forth, another thing you can do is just call her bluff. He moved in closer to her and she broke instantly, wanting to kiss him. “I can’t kiss you right now” The only reason she didn’t was most likely a logistics issue. (Notice her looking over, checking who’s still around) He continues the challenging “Get out of here” “No you get out of here” Again - it’s more bluffing and calling out the frame He wants to stamp the fact that she likes him although it’s bit of an overextension. She’s starting to get tired of it and needs the interaction to move forward. “You want this or not because if not we’re gonna go home” The thing is he keeps playing around the “do you like me” frame Which is good to keep up the tension (which this girl likes) but it also keeps the interaction at a standstill. And eventually it will stall out and break. At this point - the opposition frame hurts your outcome more than it benefits. A better path forward is either to lead - pull her, help her with her logistics, move her away from friends, etc Or at the very least, instead of fighting for position, provoke escalation. “You can’t handle me ;)” “No you can’t handle me” Get her to challenge you and you can call her bluff to escalate like what happened earlier when he walked towards her. “Stop looking at me like I won’t do something to you right now ;)” Provoke, challenge her to set up the escalation window and it breaks the dancing around of who likes who while still maintaining tension. But bottom line, this interaction is a great example. Challenging = chemistry.

The Rizz Report

48,801 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🕊️ I am deeply saddened to hear of the murder (lets call it what it is people) of a dear ritual abuse survivor, Shoshana Strock (daughter of Israeli Settlements Minister, Irit Strock) who broke ground in her country whistleblowing heinous ritualistic abuse she was being victimized to since age 2 by her family. She has stated many times she is NOT suicidal - please honor her by calling her death ‘a murder in cold blood’ - because that’s exactly what it was. Do not her abusers have the final word about her. They couldn’t shut her up, so they took her out. A fate all too common in our community of courageous survivors. Shoshana could not join the interview I did with 3 of her friends from Israel due to the restrictions and gag orders placed upon her after she blew the whistle. She did everything she could to escape her situation - recording videos, speaking out and starting fundraisers - despite the extreme danger it put her in. Recently, she was assaulted in her own apartment by her perverted and psychopathic father, and her friends and I were planning another podcast to help get the word out for her - since she is being so actively silenced. Please don’t let her story fall on deaf ears. Please don’t let her fate be called a ‘suicide’ - it was not. She was MURDERED by the network she was speaking out against. She would have never taken her own life - she made this very clear. She never knew a day without torment. Never a day of freedom. Never a day of calm or without fear. She was still being raped, tortured and abused up until they took her life… ———————- Shoshana: You created a movement in your country that never existed until you spoke it into existence that spread worldwide. Now survivors all over your country are speaking out and the outrage is only beginning. We will continue to honor your name and courage by finishing the fight you started - guided by your unfathomable bravery and selflessness to be a voice for others. You suffering and torment is over. You are now free. Rest in true peace, Shoshana 🪽🕊️🤍

E M M A ✨ K A T H E R I N E

89,386 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Funny how women get so pissed when guys go full agenda mode on a date. She handled it like a cunt with no class after the guy’s blunder but she was also mirroring where the guy was coming from in terms of energy: If the man is going to be as overtly transactional in his delivery he could have gone for an escort and he could have saved himself time and money. But no he did not and he was indecisive. She does not want to make the decision. “Are you going home with me or no?” And if you wanna bring a girl back home: Don’t give her a choice, lead the way. This is an example of how “nice” he was. Key points - Don’t take her out to a place you can barely afford. Paying for the date is the cost of doing business. - Don’t be fake nice just to try to get the coochie, she will smell it - he revealed himself to be as such by his reaction. She won’t give it up to you because you paid a meal and was nice. - If you invite her for dinner, you are playing on harder mode, because you frame yourself default as the provider, and you will deal with more BS (even non-dinner dates you will deal with more nonsense vs meeting her on a night out or on holidays - her environment will dictate her default rules of engagement). - Don’t respond logically, troll her with what she gives you at this stage when it is completely fucked: instead of “that is how it is supposed to be” - she does not give a fuck about your rules - reply with “Cool, I will message Jessica” / instead of “I am not going to cry home” reply to her verbal jabs with “quite the challenge considering your crying for paying the full bill, but thank you that meal was really nice” Relationships are transactional, but it is not because it is that you have to be so overt about, it only creates resentment for both men and women. This is the male example of agenda mode, that women do often trying to hijack dates into interviews, and amusingly enough, it is hilarious to see how pissed off they are about it.
1:02

Sensitive content

Funny how women get so pissed when guys go full agenda mode on a date. She handled it like a cunt with no class after the guy’s blunder but she was also mirroring where the guy was coming from in terms of energy: If the man is going to be as overtly transactional in his delivery he could have gone for an escort and he could have saved himself time and money. But no he did not and he was indecisive. She does not want to make the decision. “Are you going home with me or no?” And if you wanna bring a girl back home: Don’t give her a choice, lead the way. This is an example of how “nice” he was. Key points - Don’t take her out to a place you can barely afford. Paying for the date is the cost of doing business. - Don’t be fake nice just to try to get the coochie, she will smell it - he revealed himself to be as such by his reaction. She won’t give it up to you because you paid a meal and was nice. - If you invite her for dinner, you are playing on harder mode, because you frame yourself default as the provider, and you will deal with more BS (even non-dinner dates you will deal with more nonsense vs meeting her on a night out or on holidays - her environment will dictate her default rules of engagement). - Don’t respond logically, troll her with what she gives you at this stage when it is completely fucked: instead of “that is how it is supposed to be” - she does not give a fuck about your rules - reply with “Cool, I will message Jessica” / instead of “I am not going to cry home” reply to her verbal jabs with “quite the challenge considering your crying for paying the full bill, but thank you that meal was really nice” Relationships are transactional, but it is not because it is that you have to be so overt about, it only creates resentment for both men and women. This is the male example of agenda mode, that women do often trying to hijack dates into interviews, and amusingly enough, it is hilarious to see how pissed off they are about it.

French OG | Your Dating and Relationship Guide

287,060 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

We can’t say we’re shocked that Andy Burnham has sacked Bridget Phillipson as Education Secretary. One of her first acts as Secretary of State was to torpedo the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 (HEFSA) — arguably the most consequential piece of free speech legislation in the past 15 years. She reversed the commencement orders that would have brought the Act’s most important provisions into force, including the vital complaints scheme. Rather than asking Parliament to do so, she bypassed it through ministerial fiat. The Free Speech Union challenged this in the High Court on two grounds: first, that it breached the sacrosanct constitutional principle that a minister cannot defy the will of Parliament; and second, that she had failed to carry out an adequate impact assessment. Days before the case was due to be heard, Bridget Phillipson partially U-turned, announcing that she would commence most of the key provisions — and she duly did. We then became embroiled in a long-standing dispute over who had won the case. That mattered because it determined who would pay the legal costs. The High Court decided that the Free Speech Union had won and ordered the Government to pay our costs. Importantly, when Phillipson announced her partial U-turn, the Free Speech Union offered to settle if the Government paid £80,000 — around a quarter of our total legal costs. Pretty fair, no? Well, the Government refused. The Free Speech Union believes this was because Phillipson did not want to admit she had reversed course. The High Court has now ordered the Government to pay all of our costs. Bridget Phillipson’s hubris has cost taxpayers around £200,000. Combined with the Government’s own legal costs, the total bill exceeds £500,000. That also means we now have the resources to challenge Phillipson’s successor, Lucy Powell, should she attempt to reverse any of the commencement orders that bring HEFSA into force — including the much-needed complaints scheme for academics, university staff and visiting speakers, which is due to come into force on 1 September. Hear from The Free Speech Union General Secretary Lord Young of Acton 👇

The Free Speech Union

161,807 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce