Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

ESPN color commentator Greg McElroy and rules analyst Matt Austin disagreed with each other on an illegal shift ruling against Notre Dame during the Sugar Bowl. 🏈🦓🎙️🥊 #CFP

892,861 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 11

Фото профиля JMess
JMess1 год назад

Greg and Sean were clearly upset with the outcome of that game. Greg got real quiet in the 4th quarter

Фото профиля So.Gay
So.Gay1 год назад

A gay podcast host is catching heat for his morally questionable hookup app ploy.

Фото профиля BPJ✈️
BPJ✈️1 год назад

I’m gonna go with the SEC lead ref over the bama ginger.

Фото профиля Hank Rearden
Hank Rearden1 год назад

Almost the entire commentary around officiating in this game has been embarrassing.

Фото профиля Sarah Jo
Sarah Jo1 год назад

Why does ESPN have a rules analyst if the color commentator is going to contradict him? The rules analyst's entire job is to know the rules and explain them to the viewer. I've never seen anyone argue with the rules analyst to that extent.

Фото профиля Matt Meehan
Matt Meehan1 год назад

ESPN product for you right there

Фото профиля JS33
JS331 год назад

The TE Was set for like a full two second a before the snap. What’s he talking about???

Фото профиля Patrick Toal
Patrick Toal1 год назад

McElroy had no problem showing his SEC bias tonight. Makes sense tho, ESPN promotes it.

Фото профиля Nancy Pye #pyegal
Nancy Pye #pyegal1 год назад

Think the rules analyst knows the rules better

Фото профиля Ryan
Ryan1 год назад

Greg’s point was the TE wasn’t set for a second prior to the WR going in motion. His point was it was definitely close enough to call and the WR needs to give another half second prior to motioning. SM said it perfectly, it was nit-picky close, but aren’t most of these calls?

Фото профиля TM Droid 🇺🇸🏈🏀
TM Droid 🇺🇸🏈🏀1 год назад

McElroy was pulling SO hard for Georgia.

Похожие видео