Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

$ETH HAS RUN FROM THE SAME LEVEL TWICE. 169% THE FIRST TIME. 227% THE SECOND. Both moves started at $1,525. Three years. Two crashes. That floor has not moved once. Ethereum tested it again this year and is already 23% off it, at $1,882. The third test happened while...

52,980 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Game theory says the only rational answer is 1. Ben Polak had the smartest students at Yale play it for real - and 1 lost every single year. The winning number was 9, and being right is exactly what got you beaten. The game is simple. Everyone picks a whole number from 1 to 100. Whoever lands closest to two-thirds of the class average wins the money. Work it backwards and the logic is airtight. If people guess at random the average is 50, so you should pick two-thirds of that, 33. But if everyone thinks that far, the average is 33, so you pick 22. Chase the reasoning to its end and every number collapses to 1 - the Nash equilibrium, the only choice that survives if everyone is rational, knows everyone is rational, and knows that they know, forever. So 1 is the "correct" answer. It also loses. The reason is a model of how deep people actually reason: g = 50 × (2/3)^k Start at 50, the random baseline. Each k is one round of "assume everyone else divides by two-thirds." Level 1 gives 33. Level 2 gives 22. Level 3 gives about 15. The Nash player sits at k = infinity and lands on 1. Real humans do not go to infinity. Polak's class averaged 13.33, which the model places at roughly level 3. Two-thirds of 13.33 is 8.9. Round it, and 9 wins. Anyone who played the "rational" 1 was several levels too deep and finished nowhere. This is not a one-off. The same game run on Yale classes came in at 18.5, then 21.5, then 23, then 13.33. Never close to 1. The crowd reasons two to three levels deep and no further, so the money sits near two-thirds of that, not at the equilibrium. It generalizes anywhere the payoff depends on the crowd rather than the theory. A market can stay "wrong" for years because the winning move is not fair value, it is two-thirds of the average guess at fair value. Keynes called it the beauty contest sixty years before anyone put a number on it. The equilibrium tells you where the game ends if everyone is perfect. The money is one step ahead of where the crowd actually stands. Model the players, not the theory.

Orion

177,819 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

🚨EVERYONE THINKS ETHEREUM IS DEAD That's exactly why I'm paying attention The market is treating $ETH like it's just another altcoin It isn't Ethereum has already fallen almost 70% from its all-time high, while Bitcoin has held up much better That underperformance is exactly why the narrative has become so one-sided "ETH is dead" "The cycle is over" "Just buy BTC" I've heard this before The easiest way to see what's happening is the ETH/BTC chart The ratio has been crushed for years and is sitting near levels we haven't seen in a long time After months of underperformance, people stopped comparing Ethereum to Bitcoin and started comparing it to every failing altcoin That's the mistake $BTC and $ETH are still the only two crypto assets with more than a decade of history, no insider unlocks, no VC emissions and real institutional adoption The difference is that their economics are no longer the same Around a third of all $ETH is staked, earning native yield while remaining locked inside the network Bitcoin doesn't do that New $BTC is still issued every day, and miners regularly sell part of it to cover electricity, hardware and operating costs Then look at the corporate treasuries Companies holding Bitcoin own an asset that doesn't generate cash flow on its own Companies building Ethereum treasuries can stake their $ETH and earn yield while they wait It's the difference between holding an asset... And holding an asset that pays you to stay patient That's why I think the market is pricing Ethereum like a broken asset while ignoring how much its structure has changed over the last few years Could ETH still go lower? Of course. Markets always overshoot. That's why my interest starts between $1,400 and $1,050 Not because I know the exact bottom, but because that's where the risk/reward finally becomes asymmetric Last cycle everyone was calling for $10,000 $ETH It never happened This cycle everyone is calling Ethereum dead Markets have a funny habit of disappointing the majority I'm not bearish on both I just think the asset everyone has already given up on often becomes the one that surprises the most That's why I'm buying fear instead of chasing strength Maybe I'm early But I'd rather accumulate when everyone hates Ethereum than fight the crowd after it starts making new highs again Follow and turn notifications on Next few months could completely change the narrative

BLADE

27,548 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce