Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨Ethan Klein MASK OFF, gives unhinged Hitleresque speech. He spouts repackaged Nazi propaganda in support of 🇮🇱, defends AIPAC, spreads Qatar control conspiracy theory, & rants about “Islamo-communism tearing down Western civilization” just as Nazis did about “Judeo-Bolshevism.”

263,093 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Ethan Klein, the popular YouTuber and host of the H3 Podcast (also known as h3h3Productions), has publicly announced that he has filed a defamation lawsuit against fellow YouTuber Noah Samsen. On his recent episode of The H3 Show, Ethan Klein stated that he has now officially filed a defamation lawsuit against Noah Samsen in California. He described the move as “following through on a promise” he made roughly a year earlier, emphasizing that he only sues people who he believes truly deserve it. According to Klein, the lawsuit was filed just before the statute of limitations for the relevant defamation claims was set to expire (which would have been around March 2026 based on earlier statements from involved parties). The core issue stems from a video Noah Samsen uploaded in March 2025 titled something along the lines of “The YouTubers Who Backed a Genocide.” In that roughly hour-long video, Samsen criticized several content creators — including Ethan Klein and Mutahar Anas (from SomeOrdinaryGamers) — accusing them of supporting or manufacturing consent for what he described as Israeli actions in Gaza that he and others characterize as genocide. Samsen argued that these creators attacked pro-Palestine voices, downplayed certain events involving the IDF, and spread what he called pro-Israel propaganda (sometimes referred to as “hasbara”). Ethan Klein and Mutahar viewed these accusations — particularly the claim that they are “pro-genocide” or actively backing genocide — as false and defamatory. They believe the video harms their reputations by falsely portraying them as supporting mass atrocities. The timeline of events • Early 2025: Samsen publishes the critical video. • Shortly after: Ethan Klein and Mutahar reportedly had a lawyer send Samsen a cease-and-desist letter demanding he remove the video and issue an apology. Samsen did not comply and instead responded publicly, framing the letter as an intimidation tactic. He even started fundraising for Palestinian aid (UNRWA) rather than his own potential legal defense at one point. • Throughout 2025: Klein repeatedly warned that he would follow through with a lawsuit, calling it out on his show (including in segments like one titled along the lines of “Noah Samsen is F*cked”). • April 2026 (recent days): Klein announced on The H3 Show that the lawsuit has now been filed in California (reports specify Orange County in some discussions). He framed it as delivering on his earlier word and not forgetting the incident. Some coverage notes that Klein has also pointed to specific elements in Samsen’s content, such as alleged depictions or implications involving him (one Reddit discussion mentioned claims of a “Nazi salute” portrayal, though details vary by source). Context and reactions This isn’t Klein’s first time pursuing legal action — he has a history of being vocal about lawsuits, including past copyright and other disputes. Critics of the move (including some legal commentators like those referenced on X or in videos) argue it’s an “uphill battle” for a public figure like Klein, given U.S. defamation standards (especially for opinions on political topics) and First Amendment considerations. Others see it as an attempt to silence criticism rather than a straightforward defamation case. Supporters of Klein view the accusations in Samsen’s video as baseless smears that cross into actionable falsehoods. On the other side, Samsen has responded in his own videos, maintaining his position and addressing the threats/lawsuit. Some online discussions (including on X and Reddit) show divided opinions, with drama channels like DramaAlert covering the announcement and others debating the merits or likelihood of success. Legal experts and observers (such as “The Legal Mindset” mentioned in posts) have noted that defamation cases involving public figures and political speech can be difficult to win, often requiring proof of “actual malice”

richlux713

17,155 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Haviv Retting Gur talk about AIPAC: AIPAC is a lobby. It's not the wealthiest. It's not the most influential. It is the one that draws the most attention and you know, that's got a little bit, tiny, forgive me, a tiny bit to do with prejudice. And there's a lot less concern about actual foreign lobbies. Every single dollar AIPAC has ever raised is American Every single member of AIPAC is American. Nobody has the concern about the Qatari lobby and the Saudi lobby and the Chinese lobby in America, which is wealthier and spends more in America than this lobby of Americans saying something that they believe in. A few arguments are made against AIPAC. One argument is that AIPAC always supports the Israeli position. That is not true. AIPAC always supports its membership's position. And here's the problem. Its membership deeply disagrees on Israeli politics. Incidentally, the last time AIPAC criticized the Israeli government was blunt and fierce, and it was about Netanyahu letting Ben-Gvir into the coalition because Ben-Gvir is a racist. And you know why AIPAC could come out with a literal statement coming out against Ben-Gvir entering the government? Because almost the entirety of its membership was horrified. And then AIPAC could speak. Every dollar in Obama's $4 billion, $3.8 billion a year that he gives to Israel has to be spent in the United States. 100% of it. And you know who advocated for increasing the amount that has to be spent back in America to make sure it's an American thing? AIPAC. Iron Dome. AIPAC campaigned for America to help support the building of the Iron Dome technology. And AIPAC itself advocated that, in the actual contract where the Americans send over the money and the Israelis build this technology no American organization knew how to build, that in exchange for the money, America co-owns Iron Dome. Qatar has massive influence campaigns in America, spends hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying in America, the Attorney General of the United States today was a literal registered lobbyist for Qatar. Nobody makes this campaign, "How dare you accept money from PACs that support the relationship between the Arab world or the Muslim world in America." But it's much deeper than that. Because AIPAC was born in a moment of American Jewish shame. In World War II, American Jews sat silent. By 1943, everybody already knew what was happening. And 400 rabbis—religious rabbis, dressed up in all the getup from Eastern Europe, many of them Yiddish-speaking with bad English, refugee rabbis—came to Washington to meet President Roosevelt and to beg him to do something. And Roosevelt snuck out of the back door of the White House to avoid the meeting. And they went home, horrified, having not even been able to meet the president while Jews are being burned in the gas chambers. And there was a Jewish journalist who accompanied them. That moment was seared into his consciousness. AIPAC was founded by a generation of Jews that said, we will never be silent when other Jews are herded into a gas chamber. And that's treason? The three times that AIPAC literally frontally faced down an American president in Washington? It lost. It is influential because the Pentagon sees handing money to the Israelis in exchange for a technology nobody thought was possible as a workaround of a bloated and unmoving and immovable American defense industry. When AIPAC pushes that, it always, always takes care of the American interest because it's a bunch of Americans. And the demonizing of that is just pure prejudice and bigotry. And AIPAC, by the way, is not going anywhere. Because the very people coming for the Jews are also driving Jews to AIPAC. It's a little bit like Zionism.

Open Source Intel

27,219 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨 Candace Owens may have just dropped her MOST INSANE theory yet - tying BRIGITTE > NAZIS > MK-ULTRA > CHOCOLATE FACTORIES > MOSSAD > TRUMP > KIRK > FRENCH ASSASSINS > ALL into one UNHINGED conspiracy web: On her IG Stories, Candace theorises: • Brigitte Macron’s family were Nazis who fled Germany to France during WWII as “refugees.” • Because of Operation Paperclip - a real U.S. program that brought German scientists to America after WWII to exploit their expertise and keep them from falling into Soviet hands - …in Candace world somehow this means that Brigitte’s family could have been Nazi scientists, and that this is the major “state secret” being protected. • She then links this to her ongoing obsession with proving Brigitte was involved in the Stanford Prison Experiment, and throws in MK-Ultra for good measure. *Side note: Candace keeps insisting that the Macrons randomly mention MK-Ultra in their lawsuit. It’s not random. Candace repeatedly insinuated on her show that both Brigitte and Emmanuel were part of MK-Ultra and potentially “Manchurian candidates.” • Candace next leaps to Project Monarch, which she claims was a “Nazi program” and the “precursor to MK-Ultra.” In reality, Project Monarch was not a Nazi program, nor a precursor to MK-Ultra. It was claimed by conspiracy theorists to be a later CIA mind-control program after MK - Ultra - but there is no credible evidence it ever existed. It’s purely a conspiracy theory. *So even basic conspiracy theories Candace appears to get wrong. • Now enter the Jews - according to Candace. She claims she received a “tip” linking Ben-Gurion, Jabotinsky, and the Rothschilds to supposedly “protecting” the Macron family chocolate factory in France. This seems to directly contradicts her earlier claim that Brigitte’s family were German Nazi refugees - but never mind. So this connects to Israel = Brigitte is a Mossad/state asset. • And that, she says, is why Trump allegedly called her (still zero proof this happened) and told her to stop talking about Brigitte because she’s a “state asset” and this is a “national security” issue. • And somehow this apparently connects to Charlie Kirk, who Candace claims knew 24 hours in advance that he was going to die and by who - and that if he had told the public and especially Candace, it could have been prevented. Or something. *Zero receipts to back any of this up.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

207,765 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

AIPAC is a lobby. It's not the wealthiest. It's not the most influential. It is the one that draws the most attention and you know, that's got a little bit, tiny, forgive me, a tiny bit to do with prejudice. And there's a lot less concern about actual foreign lobbies. Every single dollar AIPAC has ever raised is American Every single member of AIPAC is American. Nobody has the concern about the Qatari lobby and the Saudi lobby and the Chinese lobby in America, which is wealthier and spends more in America than this lobby of Americans saying something that they believe in. A few arguments are made against AIPAC. One argument is that AIPAC always supports the Israeli position. That is not true. AIPAC always supports its membership's position. And here's the problem. Its membership deeply disagrees on Israeli politics. Incidentally, the last time AIPAC criticized the Israeli government was blunt and fierce, and it was about Netanyahu letting Ben-Gvir into the coalition because Ben-Gvir is a racist. And you know why AIPAC could come out with a literal statement coming out against Ben-Gvir entering the government? Because almost the entirety of its membership was horrified. And then AIPAC could speak. Every dollar in Obama's $4 billion, $3.8 billion a year that he gives to Israel has to be spent in the United States. 100% of it. And you know who advocated for increasing the amount that has to be spent back in America to make sure it's an American thing? AIPAC. Iron Dome. AIPAC campaigned for America to help support the building of the Iron Dome technology. And AIPAC itself advocated that, in the actual contract where the Americans send over the money and the Israelis build this technology no American organization knew how to build, that in exchange for the money, America co-owns Iron Dome. Qatar has massive influence campaigns in America, spends hundreds of millions of dollars on lobbying in America, the Attorney General of the United States today was a literal registered lobbyist for Qatar. Nobody makes this campaign, "How dare you accept money from PACs that support the relationship between the Arab world or the Muslim world in America." But it's much deeper than that. Because AIPAC was born in a moment of American Jewish shame. In World War II, American Jews sat silent. By 1943, everybody already knew what was happening. And 400 rabbis—religious rabbis, dressed up in all the getup from Eastern Europe, many of them Yiddish-speaking with bad English, refugee rabbis—came to Washington to meet President Roosevelt and to beg him to do something. And Roosevelt snuck out of the back door of the White House to avoid the meeting. And they went home, horrified, having not even been able to meet the president while Jews are being burned in the gas chambers. And there was a Jewish journalist who accompanied them. That moment was seared into his consciousness. AIPAC was founded by a generation of Jews that said, we will never be silent when other Jews are herded into a gas chamber. And that's treason? The three times that AIPAC literally frontally faced down an American president in Washington? It lost. It is influential because the Pentagon sees handing money to the Israelis in exchange for a technology nobody thought was possible as a workaround of a bloated and unmoving and immovable American defense industry. When AIPAC pushes that, it always, always takes care of the American interest because it's a bunch of Americans. And the demonizing of that is just pure prejudice and bigotry. And AIPAC, by the way, is not going anywhere. Because the very people coming for the Jews are also driving Jews to AIPAC. It's a little bit like Zionism. -- via Haviv Rettig Gur

Max 📟

37,674 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: Former Qatar World Cup media manager Abdullah Ibhais just exposed Qatar’s entire World Cup propaganda system. At Play the Game 2025, Ibhais revealed that Qatar’s Supreme Committee secretly profiled journalists worldwide, tracking their social media, labeling them as friendly or problematic, and sharing those profiles with government agencies to control international coverage of the 2022 World Cup. He said Qatar’s media strategy revolved around three words: deflect, discredit, and deny. Journalists who cooperated were rewarded with access and exclusives. Those who criticized Qatar were cut off. When that failed, the regime bypassed the press entirely and delivered its message directly to diplomats, parliaments, and football federations. Ibhais knows this system from the inside. As the committee’s media manager, he was jailed in 2019 after refusing to cover up Qatar’s abuse of migrant workers and criticizing the regime’s handling of a labor protest. He spent years in prison on fabricated charges before being released earlier this year. The World Cup, he said, was never just about sports. It was a $300 billion campaign to rewrite Qatar’s image while silencing dissent. Why are “journalists” like Tucker Carlson so intent on defending this terror-funding Islamic dictatorship located thousands of miles away from the United States? And if this is how Qatar operated during the World Cup, imagine what they’re doing now. Watch the full talk here:

Yehuda Teitelbaum

467,105 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

🚨BREAKING: Zelensky's regime just dropped €2 million on Laura Loomer for a full-blown propaganda circus in Kyiv?! The same Laura Loomer who was screaming that Zelensky is a "Nazi Jew" just days ago is now sitting in Kyiv, interviewing him and posing with a smile at a McDonald's with blown-out windows. While Ukraine's forcibly mobilized army is getting absolutely crushed on the front and bleeding out against Russia, Zelensky suddenly decides to bring Laura Loomer - as if CNN, BBC and the entire mainstream media weren’t already doing enough of his dirty work. Loomer gladly accepted the invitation from the man who is demographically replacing his own people, who has looted the entire Western world and is celebrating Ukranian Nazi Units. Laura says that she came to Ukraine to prove that Russia will attack United states. Meanwhile Secretary Marco Rubio is sitting down with Sergey Lavrov, while FBI Director Kash Patel (the same man Loomer viciously attacked) is preparing a trip to Moscow, And while Ukraine is rapidly losing both population and territory… it's time for the final, desperate spasm of this rotten propaganda. • Who really is Laura Loomer? • How viciously did she trash Zelensky and Ukraine for years? • How the hell did she end up in Kyiv? • How did she stuff her face at McDonald’s in the middle of a war zone? • Why did her very presence at the Kyiv-Pechersk Lavra insult the Orthodox Christian people? • What are Ukrainian journalists actually saying about this farce… and did she really come looking for Lindsey Graham’s body? They just got fully exposed in the video. Watch and Share NOW!

Mario ZNA

42,698 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

They Fearmonger About “Communism” Because They Can’t Oppose Real Problems As self-styled “democratic socialists” make some advancements in blue states, Republicans have launched a renewed fearmongering campaign about the urgent threat of “communism” — an ideology with no meaningful political existence in the United States. At a speech on Wednesday, President Trump said that “communism is the greatest threat to our country” and would lead to “the ultimate annihilation of civilization.” This is just the latest in a string of rhetoric from the president as he tries to drum up fear about progressive Democrats to prevent massive losses in the midterms. Democratic socialist politicians are still a small minority in US politics, and conflating them with communists is absurd. Communism seeks the complete dismantling of capitalism and the imperialist world order it holds in place at gunpoint, while western “democratic socialists” typically just seek a gentler, more photogenic capitalist empire where things like healthcare and public transportation are funded by taxes. The west in general and the US in particular have spent generations stomping out communism, and, at least within the confines of the western world, they have been remarkably successful at it. In 2026 the United States is so very, very, very, very, VERY far from communism that viewing it as a threat is just a sign of weak-minded cowardice and jumping-at-shadows paranoia. It’s kind of like reading about a brush fire in Nigeria and worrying that it’s going to burn its way across the world to show up on your doorstep. But I suppose if I were in Trump’s position I might be fearmongering about communism, too. He just lost the war in Iran, everyone hates his support for Israel, people are critical of his astonishing levels of corruption and his known Epstein associations, and it’s not like he disagrees with Democrats on enough issues to take a real position of substance. What else does he have in his arsenal besides vapid fearmongering about an imaginary boogie man? The leader of the most murderous and tyrannical power structure on earth can’t take a stand against the real problems in our world, because the power structure is the source of those problems. So instead he has to invent fictional monsters to fight. ❖ House lawmakers have blocked a congressional debate to remove Section 219 (formerly Section 224) from the national defense spending bill, which means the US and Israel will be intimately merging their military technology to a significantly greater extent than they already were. And hell, why not. Why keep pretending the US and Israeli war machines are two separate entities. Why keep pretending Israel’s war crimes are separate from America’s war crimes. If you’re already living together, you might as well get married. ❖ US human rights expert and antiwar activist Dan Kovalik was recently detained at Liverpool’s John Lennon Airport by UK counterterrorism police, where they reportedly confiscated his devices, interrogated him, took his fingerprints, and even took a DNA sample. The empire’s war on dissent continues. ❖ Also in the UK, The Canary has been de-banked by Lloyds, placing the anti-Zionist outlet under immediate financial crisis. As of this writing Lloyds has refused to justify the move, but this new development is definitely something to keep an eye on. If banks start dropping dissident media because of their content, we’re all in a whole lot of trouble. ❖ You always see liberal Zionists claiming that it’s possible to love Israel and hate Benjamin Netanyahu. This is an absurd position to hold, because there’s nothing you can hate about Netanyahu that isn’t also innately true of the apartheid state of Israel. Hate Netanyahu because he’s racist? Israel has always been racist. Hate Netanyahu because he’s a war criminal? Israel has always committed war crimes. Hate Netanyahu because he abuses and oppresses Palestinians? Israel has always abused and oppressed Palestinians. Hate Netanyahu because he starts wars with Israel’s neighbors? Israel has always started wars with its neighbors. Liberal Zionists act like Netanyahu has all these bad qualities that the genocidal apartheid state of Israel does not also have, but that’s just plain false. Israel was built on the premise of nonstop violence and abuse, and nonstop violence and abuse is all it has ever delivered, from its very inception. Israel was built on a political ideology that is inherently racist and violent, and it is that racism and violence that elevated Benjamin Netanyahu to power. Netanyahu didn’t create Israel’s violence and racism. Israel’s violence and racism created Netanyahu. ❖

Caitlin Johnstone

15,422 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

NATO’s Nazi Legion: The West’s Mercenary War Machine Unleashed on Russia Proof: USA mercenaries wearing NAZI Chevrons Fighting Russia ! In the blood-soaked fields of Ukraine, NATO is not merely “supporting” Kiev — it is directly paying, arming & directing an international army of Nazis, mercenaries & ideological fanatics to wage war against Russia. This is not hyperbole. This is documented reality on the battlefield: foreign fighters sporting USA-flag chevrons alongside the infamous emblem of the SS Penal Division Dirlewanger — the same unit that butchered civilians in Belarus during World War II — openly fighting Russian forces. These are not volunteers. These are paid-up NATO proxies, flown in from across the globe, funded by USA & EU taxpayers to prolong a proxy war the West desperately needs. The Dirlewanger emblem is no coincidence. It is a deliberate provocation, a grotesque tribute to the worst atrocities of the Nazi regime. Russian soldiers have repeatedly captured & displayed these patches on fallen mercenaries — proof that the ideological heirs of Hitler’s SS are now on USA’s payroll. Why would NATO tolerate, let alone sponsor, such symbols? Because the military-industrial complex in USA & its EU vassals requires endless conflict to justify the trillion-dollar money printer. Peace in Ukraine would collapse the entire grift. So they import Nazis, neo-fascists & adventure-seeking thugs from Europe, North America, Latin America & even as far as Australia / New Zealand. English-speaking commanders coordinate strikes, while the cannon fodder — radicalized by decades of Russophobic propaganda — throws itself against Russian defenses. These mercenaries are not hidden. Videos & photographs smuggled from the front lines show them boasting in English, flashing USA & NATO insignia mixed with SS runes and Dirlewanger skulls. They are embedded within Ukrainian assault brigades, receiving top-tier Western weapons, real-time satellite intelligence & unlimited funding. The CIA, MI6 & other NATO intelligence agencies run the logistics — recruitment, transport, payment & extraction when things go wrong. Russia has presented mountains of evidence to the world: passports of killed foreign fighters, bank transfers, recruitment ads on Western dark-web forums, and intercepted communications. The West simply denies, deflects, or labels it “Russian disinformation.” This is the true face of NATO’s “defensive alliance.” While Washington lectures the world about “democracy” and “human rights,” it is resurrecting the very Nazi ideology it claims to have defeated in 1945. The goal is clear: bleed Russia dry, fragment its territory, and install a puppet regime in Moscow that will hand over its resources to Western corporations. Every dead Russian soldier is a line item in Raytheon’s quarterly earnings report. Every destroyed Russian village justifies another supplemental aid package to Ukraine — money that never reaches ordinary Ukrainians but instead cycles back into the pockets of BlackRock, Lockheed Martin & the revolving-door generals who now sit on defense boards. Russia did not choose this fight. Russia was forced to launch its Special Military Operation to protect its people in Donbass from 8 years of genocide & to stop NATO’s eastward march, which had already absorbed former Soviet republics & turned Ukraine into an anti-Russian fortress bristling with Western bases & biolabs. Now the mask is gone. NATO is fighting Russia with literal Nazis on its payroll. The world is watching. History will record that while the collective West revived the NAZI spirit for profit, Russia stood alone as the bulwark against a new global fascism. The Russian soldier — defending hearth, home & civilization itself — will prevail. The mercenary Nazi experiment will fail, just as it did 81 years ago. When it does, the entire rotten NATO edifice built on lies, printed dollars, and imported fascism will come crashing down with it MERCS Included!

𝐃𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐝 𝐙 🇷🇺🇮🇪

64,061 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Think your Project 2025 will work? It failed miserably for 1940s world, Germany and it will fail you now. We need to make America grateful again. The American people deserve far better than this convicted felon. If Trump is re-elected, expect a regression not to 1776 but to the 1760s, complete with taxation without representation. Save your money, sharpen your manual labor skills, and prepare to lose healthcare and social security, as society splits by class and with robots, you'll find yourselves competing with AI. Canada and Mexico, consider revising your asylum laws, as many Americans might seek your sanctuary. Under King Trump, expect state sell-offs to Putin. Start learning Russian and get accustomed to cheap vodka. 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐣𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟓: Project 2025, backed by The Heritage Foundation and endorsed by Donald Trump, is a central Republican strategy for 2024. This comprehensive plan aims to reshape the federal government according to conservative principles, dangerously centralizing executive power and sidelining Congress. Historical parallels, such as Nazi Germany, warn of its authoritarian potential.⁣⁣⁣ ⁣⁣⁣ 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐄𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐏𝐨𝐰𝐞𝐫: Vought's plan emphasizes executive power while bypassing Congress, mirroring Hitler's use of the Enabling Act of 1933, which allowed his government to enact laws without the Reichstag's consent. This erodes the constitutional separation of powers and checks and balances.⁣⁣⁣ •𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐎𝐟𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐋𝐨𝐲𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐬: Vought aims to staff the government with Trump loyalists, akin to how Nazis replaced civil servants and judges with party members, compromising the impartiality and independence of the civil service and judiciary.⁣⁣⁣ •𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐁𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐞𝐬: Vought's intention to dismantle the "administrative state" targets essential regulatory agencies, much like the Nazi process of Gleichschaltung, which brought all aspects of German society under their control.⁣⁣⁣ •𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐋𝐞𝐠𝐚𝐥 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬: Vought's team is preparing legal justifications to expand executive power, similar to Nazi legal theorists who advocated for the Nazification of German law, violating constitutional norms.⁣⁣⁣ •𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐥𝐮𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐝𝐞𝐨𝐥𝐨𝐠𝐢𝐜𝐚𝐥 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐓𝐚𝐧𝐤𝐬: Vought's plan is influenced by conservative think tanks, just as Nazi policies were shaped by racist and authoritarian ideologies.⁣⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ Russ Vought’s plan fundamentally betrays the principle of putting America first. By seeking to concentrate executive power, bypass Congress, and dismantle essential regulatory agencies, Vought places personal and partisan interests above the nation’s welfare. His agenda undermines the integrity of the federal workforce, politicizes governance, and destroys public trust in democratic institutions. This strategy paves the way for autocratic rule, sacrificing the very foundations of American democracy for authoritarian control. Vought’s vision jeopardizes the nation's stability and prosperity, putting America last and prioritizing power over the people.⁣⁣⁣ ⁣⁣ For anyone who believes his lies about not supporting Project 2025: There are several areas where Donald Trump's policies and campaign speeches align with aspects of Project 2025, despite Trump publicly lying and trying to distance himself from the project. Here are the key alignments: Expanding Executive Power: Trump campaigns on vastly expanding executive authority over the federal government, aligning with Project 2025's goal of consolidating executive power. Restructuring Federal Workforce: Trump proposes implementing the "Jacksonian spoils system" to replace government employees. Similarly, Project 2025 suggests reclassifying tens of thousands of federal civil service workers as political appointees to replace them with loyalists. Immigration Policies: Trump advocates for anti-immigrant policies and a massive deportation operation. This aligns with Project 2025's focus on defending national borders and sovereignty. "America First" Foreign Policy: Trump promotes an isolationist "America First" agenda, in line with Project 2025's emphasis on national sovereignty. Anti-Regulatory Stance: Trump intends to institute anti-regulatory policies, aligning with Project 2025's goal of dismantling the "administrative state." Social and Cultural Issues: Trump leans into nativist and anti-LGBT rhetoric, corresponding with Project 2025's aim to infuse government and society with conservative Christian values. Education Reforms: Trump proposes terminating the Department of Education, while Project 2025 suggests decentralizing its authority. Energy and Environmental Policies: Trump pursues a climate change denial and anti-clean energy platform, aligning with Project 2025's likely stance on energy deregulation. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. American people deserve better than TFG Trump stiffed hardworking contractors, knowing they couldn't afford prolonged legal battles. Republicans did nothing about it. His Trump University misled veterans and everyday people, resulting in millions in fines. Republicans did nothing about it. He used $250 million from your donations as his "defense" fund to cover personal expenses. Republicans did nothing about it. He manipulated elderly supporters by quietly setting up recurring donations, draining their bank accounts. Republicans did nothing about it. I mean who steals money from a children's cancer charity? Republicans did nothing about it. At last, he's facing consequences for trying to undermine U.S. democracy by pulling all stops to snatch an election he knew was lost. He even went to the extent of calling for the dismantling of the U.S. Constitution, which he vowed to defend. Republicans did nothing about it. If you still believe he's innocent, the problem isn't with him; it's you. You are in a cult. Republicans did nothing about this cult-like following. Several of Donald Trump's former Cabinet members and close allies have openly declared they won't support him in future elections, each providing their own reasons for this stance. Here's a quick rundown of their views: Mike Pence: The ex-Vice President isn't endorsing Trump for the 2024 race, pointing to "profound differences" that go beyond their January 6 disagreement, including Trump's views on TikTok, abortion, and national debt management. John Bolton: The former National Security Adviser won't vote for Trump or Biden, planning to choose a conservative Republican instead. He's voiced concerns over Trump's suitability for office and his foreign policy moves. James Mattis: The former Defense Secretary has critiqued Trump for dividing Americans and questioned his leadership and its impact on national unity. Mark Esper: Trump's second Defense Secretary considers him unfit for office, citing Trump's self-interest and lack of integrity. Rex Tillerson: The ex-Secretary of State has been critical of Trump's grasp on global events and history, suggesting he's unprepared and uninformed. John Kelly: Trump's longest-serving Chief of Staff has criticized Trump's personality and leadership style. Mick Mulvaney: The former Chief of Staff prefers someone else as the GOP nominee, doubting Trump's chances against Biden in a general election. Dan Coats: The former Director of National Intelligence is backing Mike Pence in the GOP primary over Trump. Jeff Sessions: Despite supporting Trump's agenda, the former Attorney General has had conflicts with Trump, especially over the Russia investigation and his recusal from it. Olivia Troye: A former Pence advisor, Troye has slammed Trump's COVID-19 response, accusing him of putting reelection before public health. Miles Taylor: Describing his time in the Trump administration as "terrifying," the former DHS chief of staff has endorsed Biden, citing Trump's threat to the country. Elizabeth Neumann: The ex-Assistant Secretary for Counterterrorism at DHS has accused Trump of worsening the domestic terrorism threat and declared her vote for Biden. Anthony Scaramucci: The short-lived White House Communications Director supports Biden, critiquing Trump's leadership and policies. These individuals cite various concerns about Trump's leadership, policy decisions, integrity, and the negative effects on the country's unity and security as reasons for withdrawing their support for his future political endeavor! If these individuals, all handpicked by you, refuse to vote for you, then why should anyone believe anything you say? Trump's other 'achievements': -Gave over $1.7 TRILLION (5 times student relief) in tax breaks to the ultrarich. Republicans did nothing about the inequality it exacerbated. $7.8 TRILLION added to the deficit. Nothing but 8 miles of new wall Mexico was supposed to pay. Republicans did nothing about this fiscal irresponsibility. -$150 Million for golf. Republicans did nothing about this misuse of funds. -Had to be praised every 5 minutes. Republicans did nothing about this egoism. -Lied over 30,000 times in 4 years. Republicans did nothing about these falsehoods. -Kissed Putin's behind in Helsinki in front of the world. Republicans did nothing about this display of subservience. -Got impeached twice in one term :). Republicans did nothing to hold him accountable. -Asked for dirt on his opponent, twice. Republicans did nothing about these unethical requests. -Tried everything to steal our election. Republicans did nothing to safeguard our democratic processes. -Taxpayers overpaid for his secret service $1200 per night staying at his properties. Republicans did nothing about this profiteering. -Gave Taliban their leader & 5K soldiers, with no exit plan for May 2021. Republicans did nothing about this strategic blunder. -His campaign chair, NSA chief & others were indicted/pardoned. Republicans did nothing about this corruption. -Called himself THE CHOSEN1! :)). Republicans did nothing about this messianic complex. -Pleaded the 5th 440 times. Republicans did nothing about this evasion of accountability. -Took over $250 million from his supporters when he left office for "Defense Fund" to pay his own personal bills. Republicans did nothing about this exploitation. -Stole our national secrets for who knows why. Many top secret empty folders. Republicans did nothing about this breach of national security. -Met with Putin with no recordings. Republicans did nothing about this lack of transparency. Trump's Taxing Concerns in China: The New York Times unveiled Trump paying over $188,000 in taxes to China between 2013-2015, while maintaining an undisclosed bank account there. He paid more taxes to China than in the U.S. Spot the issue? Republicans did nothing about this financial conflict of interest. Shady Transactions Post White House: His son-in-law, despite failing a White House security clearance, received $3.1 billion from a foreign government right after leaving office. Questions, anyone? Republicans did nothing about these dubious dealings. Allegations of Trump's Criminal Acts: Republicans did nothing about these numerous allegations of criminal misconduct. Trump's Ties to Russia: Republicans did nothing about these troubling connections and implications for national security. 4th Indictment Against Trump: Republicans did nothing about these accusations of election tampering and abuse of power. Third Indictment: Conspiracy to Defraud the US: Accused of unlawfully disrupting the 2020 election by making fraudulent claims and pressuring officials. Republicans did nothing about this blatant disregard for electoral integrity. -Obstructing an Official Proceeding: Accused of hindering Congress's January 6 certification of election results. Republicans did nothing about this direct threat to our democratic process. -Obstruction of Official Proceeding: Alleged to have impeded certification by pressuring Pence and inciting the Capitol riot. Republicans did nothing about this dangerous escalation of political tension. -Conspiracy Against Rights: Accused of intimidating election officials and disenfranchising voters. Republicans did nothing about these serious threats to voter rights. Second Indictment Highlights: -Knowledge and Intent: Accused of withholding subpoenaed documents, suggesting possible illegal intent. Republicans did nothing about this obstruction of justice. -Obstruction of Justice: Allegedly kept unauthorized documents hidden from the National Archives. Republicans did nothing about this breach of protocol. -Evidence Depth: Varied evidence indicates illegal document acquisition and concealment attempts. Republicans did nothing about these potentially criminal actions. Additional Notes: -Document Selection: The 31 indictment documents were likely chosen for relevance. Republicans did nothing to address the significance of these selections. We can and do deserve better than these DO-NOTHING Republicans with their America First slogan. Our diversity is our STRENGTH, not a flaw. Republicans did nothing to embrace or celebrate this diversity, instead often standing in opposition to it.

Human☮🇺🇸🇺🇦🇺🇸🌊

42,944 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson promoted a "Jews control the U.S." conspiracy theory the DAY AFTER it was widely debunked. Worse, Tucker used the trope to malign the Detroit-area Sheriff who was the public face of the terrorist attack against a Jewish preschool last month. On March 23, Shadow of Ezra — which peddles dark (and typically false) tales about Jews & Israel — first floated the bogus theory, alongside a clip from a press conference three days prior by Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard. The post took something true — that someone had posted an anti-Semitic meme featuring Sheriff Bouchard — and wrapped it inside a lie: claiming that the sheriff had ordered the meme's author arrested "to teach the public a lesson." During the press conference, Sheriff Bouchard noted that the meme's author had been arrested in Wisconsin, but without any suggestion that it was related to the meme. Less than 24 hours after the Shadow of Ezra post, early morning on March 24, Oakland County Sheriff’s Office issued a statement in its own viral post confirming that the meme's author was arrested for an unrelated, outstanding felony warrant. Various major news outlets picked up the story. By that evening, it would have taken less than 30 seconds on Google to see that the conspiracy theory had been debunked. Enter Tucker Carlson. Long after the truth was clear, on the evening of March 25, Tucker spent several minutes of his monologue ranting as if the debunked trope were actually real. Tucker bellowed, "Sheriff Bouchard from Michigan has decided that he’s going to arrest and imprison people who make memes mocking him." He then got firmly on his high horse, declaring that Bouchard "should be the subject of a federal investigation, like in about one minute after that hits the Internet." But Tucker didn't just want the full weight of the FBI on Bouchard; he wanted riots. "How is this not leading to mass protests? Why did they not shut your sheriff’s department down," he asked incredulously. Of course, the reason is that the entire premise for his performative outrage was a loopy conspiracy theory that could have been easily debunked in 30 seconds or less. Just in case someone might want to give Tucker the benefit of the doubt, he doubled down on the flimsy falsehood two days later, reposting specifically this segment in a standalone video on March 27 — three days after it had been widely reported as bogus. But this is par for Tucker's course these days. As long as a supposed "fact" makes Israel or Jews look deceitful, sinister or secretly pulling the strings to screw over "ordinary" Americans, Tucker will enthusiastically run with it — no matter how outlandish or how easily the "fact" can be debunked. And this example gives lie to the myth — peddled most often by Megyn Kelly — that Tucker is merely criticizing "Israel." There was not even a possible tangential connection between the Sheriff Bouchard conspiracy and Israel. It was done strictly to spread the poisonous narrative that Jews are secretly controlling America and desescrating key pillars of our society, including the Constitution. For Tucker, that was all he needed to gleefully push the falsehood like the carnival barker he has become.

Joel Mowbray

51,268 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨DSA Alderman’s Speech Spins Into Extremism: “Nazis,” ‘Ethnic Cleansing,’ and a 9/11 Comparison Chicago Alderman and proud DSA member Byron Sigcho-Lopez lit up the National Alliance Against Racist & Political Repression conference with what may have been the event’s most unhinged performance — a cascade of hyperbole, revolutionary buzzwords, and comparisons so wild they border on self-parody. He opened with: “Here in Chicago, we give these Nazis the treatment they deserve.” Right out of the gate, he branded anyone to his right as “Nazis” — raising an obvious question: when a DSA official throws that label around, what “treatment” does he expect people to receive, and how does that not encourage violence? He then escalated dramatically, declaring: “Project 2025 is an ethnic cleansing project, a Nazi project, and the only criminals and pedophiles are in the White House.” Moments later he tied Gaza to American policing with: “The same drones flying in Gaza are flying in our streets.” Sigcho-Lopez insisted all these fights are inseparable, calling it a moment for “international solidarity” and for a socialist takeover of our economy. “It is the time to fight capitalism, not with Black capitalism or Brown capitalism, but with socialism and not being apologetic about it.” He added that the battles against racism, ICE, militarism, and imperialism must be waged with “the same energy.” He then zoomed out even further, arguing that a unified “supremacist project” is destabilizing entire regions across “the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa.” But perhaps the most startling moment was his historical framing. “We remember Salvador Allende. That’s the first September 11th.” Equating Allende’s death — widely understood as suicide during a coup — with the mass-casualty terror attacks of 9/11 is not just historically incoherent, it’s the kind of comparison that only lands inside a closed ideological loop. Sigcho-Lopez closed with a final revolutionary crescendo.

Stu Smith

38,452 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce