正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

EV ANXIETY ISN'T JUST ABOUT RANGE. IT'S ABOUT SUPPORT. 💔 Stranded for 5+ hours. Multiple calls. Multiple complaints. Still no roadside assistance. People spend lakhs on EVs expecting peace of mind, not uncertainty. #Mahindra #MahindraElectric #EV #RoadsideAssistance #CustomerService #India

25,304 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Dr. Mike Yeadon: The Real Agenda Behind the EV Mandate—It’s Not About the Environment The push for electric vehicles (EVs) has nothing to do with saving the planet and everything to do with dismantling the automotive industry as we know it. According to Dr. Mike Yeadon, modern internal combustion engine (ICE) cars are already so clean that their exhaust is purer than the air in many cities. Thanks to catalytic converters, nitric oxide converters, computer-controlled fuel injection, and stop-start technology, today’s petrol and diesel vehicles emit almost no detectable pollution. Gone are the days of choking fumes and stinging eyes—yet governments are still forcing a transition to EVs under the guise of environmentalism. The truth? The EV mandate is a deliberate attack on mass manufacturing. Automakers like Volkswagen, Audi, and Ford are being squeezed from both sides: fined £15,000 per car if they don’t meet escalating EV sales quotas, while simultaneously facing unbeatable competition from subsidized Chinese imports. With 180 Chinese EV manufacturers—most operating at a loss—it’s clear that someone is willing to spend hundreds of billions to flood the market with cheap EVs, undercutting European and American brands. The result? Bankruptcy for legacy automakers. By restricting petrol and diesel sales while making EVs financially unsustainable, the system ensures that fewer cars will be available overall. The endgame isn’t just to force people into EVs—it’s to eliminate private car ownership entirely. By the end of this decade, only a handful of Chinese EV makers may remain profitable. The rest will collapse, leaving the West dependent on a controlled, limited supply of vehicles. The mandate won’t even need to be enforced—there simply won’t be enough cars to go around. This isn’t about emissions. It’s about control.

Camus

54,856 次观看 • 8 个月前

"To end this war and go the diplomatic way, I don't need all this historical sh*t, because it's just a postponement," President Zelenskyy said on the potential negotiations with Putin. Other statements by the President of Ukraine from the interview with British journalist Piers Morgan: ◾️ Yes, people are tired. Yes, people want to finish with this tragedy. We want to stop Putin and end this war as quickly as possible, but in the right way, not losing dignity in any way. ◾️ Russians try to sell to their audience the successful steps, but they can't, really. Even the very nationalistic, very radical part of Russia doesn't trust their government and Putin because they see that there are no successful steps on the battlefield. ◾️ If the war is in Europe, I think peace negotiations have to be in Europe. The next meeting will also be in Switzerland. ◾️ We had two groups - military and diplomatic. The military group spoke about how to develop a monitoring mission for a ceasefire when it comes, when the political side opens those possibilities. ◾️ The result is closer in the military direction. We will have a paper where all the details will be written about how to monitor immediately after a ceasefire. In the political direction, it's more difficult. We don't have the same view. Even trilaterally, we have three different views on the land question. This is not simple. We try to be very constructive. ◾️ Russia's proposal for Ukrainians is to withdraw our forces from part of the Donetsk region, just to withdraw by ourselves, and the war will stop. But we can't just withdraw. It's unbelievable how that can be. It's our territory, and the temporarily occupied territory is also our territory. It's not just occupied, it's temporarily occupied. We are not recognizing it judicially, and we are not recognizing it de facto in any papers. Yes, it's temporarily occupied territories. It's very painful for us, but let's stop where we stand. And this is already a big compromise. ◾️ Donbas is a part of our independence. It's a part of our values. It's not just about the land, about territories. It's about people. It's about membership, and also about strategy for defending our country. For today, with all respect to the powerful American president and to America as a whole, nobody can give us a strong word that Putin will not come again. We need strong security guarantees so that the rest of the world, or some countries, will be ready to respond to Putin if he comes back with his aggression, or when he comes again. ◾️ It's not about me. We have to think about the next generation. We have to think about the next people who will sit in our chairs, and they have to manage this. We can't give them an empty paper. We need strong security guarantees. ◾️ I can't trust the person who killed so many people in Ukraine and who began a full-scale invasion against my nation. But in any way, it's not about trust. It's about deciding how to end the war. ◾️ I'm not sure that our teams can really decide the question of the land. At the end, it's our people who accept the peace deal or not. It's not up to anybody in the world. It's up to the Ukrainian people. ◾️ We speak about security guarantees because we don't trust Russians. Personally Putin, and personally Russians. It's not just about Putin. It's about the system, about people around him. Even when another person is in his place, and other people are in my place. It means that we have to speak about institutional trust. Trust not each other, but the institution of security guarantees.

Anton Gerashchenko

20,717 次观看 • 4 个月前