Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Even Anthropic's own distribution partner pulled back once data sharing stopped being optional. On Ep. 311 of The Six Five Pod, Patrick Moorhead ties the moment directly to the case for sovereign AI and on-prem infrastructure. "Once Fable 5 hit and you had to share data... all bets were... show more

Six Five Media

4,404 subscribers

37,982 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

ANTHROPIC'S HEAD OF ENGINEERING SAYS THEY JUST SHIPPED THE MOST CAPABLE MODELS THEY HAVE EVER BUILT Mythos 5 and Fable 5. Fable 5 can run for days on a single goal and get it right on the first pass, on work that used to need an entire team. Most people use AI to summarize things. The real leverage is the long autonomous task you keep putting off.

ANTHROPIC'S HEAD OF ENGINEERING SAYS THEY JUST SHIPPED THE MOST CAPABLE MODELS THEY HAVE EVER BUILT Mythos 5 and Fable 5. Fable 5 can run for days on a single goal and get it right on the first pass, on work that used to need an entire team. Most people use AI to summarize things. The real leverage is the long autonomous task you keep putting off.

0xMarioNawfal

57,127 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

I asked Fable 5 to recreate Monopoly but make each of the properties an AI lab or startup. It implemented everything - game rules, money system, turns, even share codes for multiplayer games. Once you have a monopoly, you can build racks and eventually a data center 🤓

I asked Fable 5 to recreate Monopoly but make each of the properties an AI lab or startup. It implemented everything - game rules, money system, turns, even share codes for multiplayer games. Once you have a monopoly, you can build racks and eventually a data center 🤓

Justine Moore

440,802 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

A TRADER USED CLAUDE FABLE 5 TO TURN AN $11,000 LOSS INTO $300,000 IN FIVE DAYS AND THEN THE GOVERNMENT PULLED THE MODEL Fable 5 wasn't predicting prices. It was computing the full probability surface of a market, every outcome weighted, faster than the market could correct itself. One of those bets paid x205. The model is gone. The algorithm it wrote is still running on Polymarket right now.

A TRADER USED CLAUDE FABLE 5 TO TURN AN $11,000 LOSS INTO $300,000 IN FIVE DAYS AND THEN THE GOVERNMENT PULLED THE MODEL Fable 5 wasn't predicting prices. It was computing the full probability surface of a market, every outcome weighted, faster than the market could correct itself. One of those bets paid x205. The model is gone. The algorithm it wrote is still running on Polymarket right now.

0xMarioNawfal

114,365 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on the biggest threat to the data center industry: It's not competition. It's not regulation. It's decentralisation. "The biggest threat to a data center is if the intelligence can be packed locally on a chip that's running on the device and then there's no need to inference all of it on like one centralized data center." He outlines how this could work in practice. Personalisation doesn't necessarily require on-device model training. Retrieval augmented generation, tool calls, and local data can already tailor AI to individual users. But the real unlock? Test time training. Aravind Srinivas describes a future where AI lives on your device, watches how you work and gradually automates your repetitive tasks. "Imagine we crack test time training where the AI watches tasks you repeatedly do on your local system, adapts to you over time and starts automating a lot of the things you do." The key insight: in this model, the intelligence belongs to you. It's your data, your device, your personalised AI brain. And if that future arrives, the economics of centralised infrastructure start to collapse. "That really disrupts the whole data center industry. It doesn't make sense to spend all this money, 500 billion, 5 trillion, whatever on building all the centralized data centers across the world that do a lot of the intelligence workloads for people." The companies spending trillions on centralised infrastructure may want to rethink where intelligence actually needs to live.

Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas on the biggest threat to the data center industry: It's not competition. It's not regulation. It's decentralisation. "The biggest threat to a data center is if the intelligence can be packed locally on a chip that's running on the device and then there's no need to inference all of it on like one centralized data center." He outlines how this could work in practice. Personalisation doesn't necessarily require on-device model training. Retrieval augmented generation, tool calls, and local data can already tailor AI to individual users. But the real unlock? Test time training. Aravind Srinivas describes a future where AI lives on your device, watches how you work and gradually automates your repetitive tasks. "Imagine we crack test time training where the AI watches tasks you repeatedly do on your local system, adapts to you over time and starts automating a lot of the things you do." The key insight: in this model, the intelligence belongs to you. It's your data, your device, your personalised AI brain. And if that future arrives, the economics of centralised infrastructure start to collapse. "That really disrupts the whole data center industry. It doesn't make sense to spend all this money, 500 billion, 5 trillion, whatever on building all the centralized data centers across the world that do a lot of the intelligence workloads for people." The companies spending trillions on centralised infrastructure may want to rethink where intelligence actually needs to live.

Big Brain AI

90,276 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

An asian guy just found a way to use Fable 5 forever, even though Anthropic is going to make it access-limited after 12th July. He used Opus 4.8 to host the operating manual of fable 5 with just one single prompt. Access to the best model is never guaranteed. It disappeared once already this year. But you can use it forever. Here's how: 1. Extract the operating manual of Fable 5 2. Create an .md file and save it on your device 3. Create a new project "Fable 5 Brain" in Claude 4. Paste the instructions/ .md file straight into it 5. Run a pressure test to verify Save and bookmark this no matter what:

An asian guy just found a way to use Fable 5 forever, even though Anthropic is going to make it access-limited after 12th July. He used Opus 4.8 to host the operating manual of fable 5 with just one single prompt. Access to the best model is never guaranteed. It disappeared once already this year. But you can use it forever. Here's how: 1. Extract the operating manual of Fable 5 2. Create an .md file and save it on your device 3. Create a new project "Fable 5 Brain" in Claude 4. Paste the instructions/ .md file straight into it 5. Run a pressure test to verify Save and bookmark this no matter what:

Aria Westcott

379,292 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

Something feels seriously off with Claude Fable 5.1 🙄 I recreated the exact same 3D stadium I had built with Fable 5 just to see how much better 5.1 would be. Instead, Fable 5.1 took more than > 1 hour and hit the max limit 2 or 3 times on a single prompt. Fable 5 basically had the whole website ready in one shot and its output was actually much better. Fable 5.1 felt good with metal but added these weird black things that look like basket wings... genuinely have no idea what those are. Not good. And this observation isn’t just for one website. I saw similar behavior with a much simpler hero page where Fable 5.1 maxed out on a single prompt, something I never really experienced with Fable 5 for similar other websites Also, 3D models and animations of that other website also looked noticeably worse compared to what Fable 5 used to produce. In fact, they were even worse than what I’ve seen Opus 5 do. I’ll keep testing it, but so far Fable 5.1 feels less like an upgrade and more like a regression to me, tbh.

The Bugged Dev

98,232 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

A few weeks ago the US government forced Claude Fable 5 offline. It's back. And before they switch it off again, this is your shot to point the most powerful AI on earth at something of your own. Take the 26-year-old in Toronto. His bot went dark the day Fable 5 got pulled. The day it came back, it woke up and started printing again - $568,000 profit and counting. His wallet: Here's the story. When the ban hit, Anthropic had to switch Fable 5 off for everyone. They called it a misunderstanding with the government. Whatever it was, every bot running on that model stopped cold. His was one of them. He didn't rebuild a thing. The loop just sat there, paused, for weeks. Here's what that loop actually does. It's not one prompt to an AI. It's an agentic loop: a team of agents running on repeat. One reads the market, one places the trade, one tries to prove it wrong before a cent moves. Then it goes again, around the clock, keeping what works and dropping what doesn't. Fable 5 is the brain running that team. The exact model the government decided was too powerful to leave on. Point it at Bitcoin's 5-minute markets and it barely misses. Most of its trades close green, and it runs itself. He checks it from his phone. The government could switch off the model. It couldn't switch off the idea. Now the model's back, and so is the money. Save this before next headline. You'll want it the day Fable 5 hits offline again.

A few weeks ago the US government forced Claude Fable 5 offline. It's back. And before they switch it off again, this is your shot to point the most powerful AI on earth at something of your own. Take the 26-year-old in Toronto. His bot went dark the day Fable 5 got pulled. The day it came back, it woke up and started printing again - $568,000 profit and counting. His wallet: Here's the story. When the ban hit, Anthropic had to switch Fable 5 off for everyone. They called it a misunderstanding with the government. Whatever it was, every bot running on that model stopped cold. His was one of them. He didn't rebuild a thing. The loop just sat there, paused, for weeks. Here's what that loop actually does. It's not one prompt to an AI. It's an agentic loop: a team of agents running on repeat. One reads the market, one places the trade, one tries to prove it wrong before a cent moves. Then it goes again, around the clock, keeping what works and dropping what doesn't. Fable 5 is the brain running that team. The exact model the government decided was too powerful to leave on. Point it at Bitcoin's 5-minute markets and it barely misses. Most of its trades close green, and it runs itself. He checks it from his phone. The government could switch off the model. It couldn't switch off the idea. Now the model's back, and so is the money. Save this before next headline. You'll want it the day Fable 5 hits offline again.

cvxv666

24,298 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

♦️Must Watch♦️ EFF MP, Commissar Naledi Chirwa-Mpungose on Newzroom Afrika, discussing ICASA’s decision to amend the rules on the expiry of mobile data bundles. We want people to be able to buy data and use it as and when they choose. It must not be a once-off arrangement, data should remain available at all times until it is fully used. #ThankYouEFF

♦️Must Watch♦️ EFF MP, Commissar Naledi Chirwa-Mpungose on Newzroom Afrika, discussing ICASA’s decision to amend the rules on the expiry of mobile data bundles. We want people to be able to buy data and use it as and when they choose. It must not be a once-off arrangement, data should remain available at all times until it is fully used. #ThankYouEFF

Economic Freedom Fighters

19,779 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

IT’S HAPPENING!! 😬 Citizens are now being spied on and arrested for protesting AI data centers. Why? Because the purpose of these facilities isn’t to power “chatbots”, but create the infrastructure to surveil you 24-7. Do not back down. Do not comply!! 🤬

IT’S HAPPENING!! 😬 Citizens are now being spied on and arrested for protesting AI data centers. Why? Because the purpose of these facilities isn’t to power “chatbots”, but create the infrastructure to surveil you 24-7. Do not back down. Do not comply!! 🤬

James Li

30,097 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

How to extract data from papers for literature review in seconds? 1. Go to 2. Upload 2-3 papers you already know are relevant 3. Start with clicking on one paper 4. ResearchCollab do the following for the paper ✦ Provide a short overview of the paper ✦ Identify weaknesses in the paper ✦ Share papers that contrast the existing paper ✦ Extract meta data about the paper ✦ Evaluate each part (e.g., methodology) of the paper ✦ Provide AI chat to extract any other data 5. Now click on the Related Papers button at top right 6. You will get papers related to the seed paper 7. You can click on each paper and read its abstract 8. If you find it relevant, just add it to your list of papers 9. Do the same for the other 2 seed papers 10. This way you will collect all relevant papers 11. And extract data from those papers After this, analyse the data and report the findings. Try ResearchCollab today:

How to extract data from papers for literature review in seconds? 1. Go to 2. Upload 2-3 papers you already know are relevant 3. Start with clicking on one paper 4. ResearchCollab do the following for the paper ✦ Provide a short overview of the paper ✦ Identify weaknesses in the paper ✦ Share papers that contrast the existing paper ✦ Extract meta data about the paper ✦ Evaluate each part (e.g., methodology) of the paper ✦ Provide AI chat to extract any other data 5. Now click on the Related Papers button at top right 6. You will get papers related to the seed paper 7. You can click on each paper and read its abstract 8. If you find it relevant, just add it to your list of papers 9. Do the same for the other 2 seed papers 10. This way you will collect all relevant papers 11. And extract data from those papers After this, analyse the data and report the findings. Try ResearchCollab today:

Faheem Ullah

26,494 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

fable 5.1 vs fable 5 vs opus 5 – three lord of the rings landmarks, built in 3d from one image the setup: one reference image per scene, one html file per build, everything procedural – no meshes, no textures, no image files, nothing past Three.js from a cdn. each model reads the picture, writes its own prompt from it, then builds to that prompt in the same turn. three named camera shots per scene on keys 1/2/3, so it can be screen-recorded. run through OpenRouter tasks: 1. bag end – hobbiton from two frames, outside and in. the round green door has to open onto the room you are standing in 2. barad-dûr – the tower and orodruin from one film still. the eye has to move and track the camera, the volcano erupts on a cycle, the clouds never stop 3. rivendell – jerry vanderstelt's painting. sun shafts that shimmer, water that falls without a break, trees that sway on a gust models: Anthropic fable 5.1, fable 5, opus 5 total cost, three builds #1 fable 5 – $14.97 #2 opus 5 – $18.53 #3 fable 5.1 – $22.38 wall clock, three builds #1 fable 5 – 38m #2 fable 5.1 – 92m #3 opus 5 – 122m output tokens #1 fable 5 – 298,592 #2 fable 5.1 – 439,435 #3 opus 5 – 724,418 lines of code shipped #1 fable 5 – 2,885 #2 fable 5.1 – 4,021 #3 opus 5 – 5,161 biggest single build, lines #1 opus 5, bag end – 2,410 #2 fable 5.1, barad-dûr – 1,375 #3 fable 5, bag end – 1,319 observations: • fable 5.1 is the only model that furnished the bag end interior – a live fire, panelling, books on the floor, leaded diamond windows, against fable 5's flat color and opus's dark tunnel. the round door outside opens onto that room, the hard part of the brief • what it costs is thinking room. the 128k output ceiling is a thinking budget in disguise: fable 5.1 burned 102,116 of it on reasoning and hit the wall mid-file. opus spent 109,241 and hit the same wall. fable 5 spent 61,240 and finished bag end in one call – the only one that did • fable 5.1's first pass is not the finished thing. its barad-dûr came back with three defects you only catch by looking at it – nothing a read of the code would have flagged • it is the best of the three at being corrected. handed a plain list of what was wrong, it returned 32 targeted patches over two rounds, every one applied first try, and it worked out one of the causes itself instead of guessing at constants conclusion: nine scenes, 12,067 lines and 1.46m output tokens for $55.88 all in – and the cheapest model was also the fastest, by 3.2x! follow thehype. for 24/7 ai news, analysis and breakdowns

thehype.

18,509 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

CARV envisions a new form of evolution for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): one driven by the aggregation, sharing, and refinement of high-quality on-chain and off-chain data. To do that, CARV is building an AI chain ecosystem to enable data sovereignty at scale: • CARV SVM Chain, an AI agentic infrastructure that extends SVM's capabilities onto Ethereum. • D.A.T.A. Framework, powered by CARV ID, delivers high-quality on-chain and off-chain data, enriched with tags and metrics, enabling AI agents to learn, share, and evolve dynamically. • CARV Labs accelerates ecosystem growth in and beyond CARV’s ecosystem, spearheading innovation in the AI agentic infrastructure enabling data sovereignty with incubation, grants, and infrastructure. You build?

CARV envisions a new form of evolution for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI): one driven by the aggregation, sharing, and refinement of high-quality on-chain and off-chain data. To do that, CARV is building an AI chain ecosystem to enable data sovereignty at scale: • CARV SVM Chain, an AI agentic infrastructure that extends SVM's capabilities onto Ethereum. • D.A.T.A. Framework, powered by CARV ID, delivers high-quality on-chain and off-chain data, enriched with tags and metrics, enabling AI agents to learn, share, and evolve dynamically. • CARV Labs accelerates ecosystem growth in and beyond CARV’s ecosystem, spearheading innovation in the AI agentic infrastructure enabling data sovereignty with incubation, grants, and infrastructure. You build?

CARV

274,756 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Fable 5 is BACK on AI/ML API We gave Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 the exact same prompt and same real flight dataset of 70 airports and 435 routes pulled from flightradar. Then asked each one to turn it into a cinematic 3D globe as a single HTML file. Outputs: Sonnet 5: 9.8k tokens, $0.10 Fable 5: 15k tokens, $0.77 Sonnet 5 came in 87% cheaper. It drew the routes, but the planet underneath them barely exists: a dark wireframe with the arcs floating in space. Fable 5 built an actual Earth: textured oceans, ice caps, atmospheric glow. Mythos-class models are truly a masterpiece. Docs, guides & setup below:

Fable 5 is BACK on AI/ML API We gave Sonnet 5 and Fable 5 the exact same prompt and same real flight dataset of 70 airports and 435 routes pulled from flightradar. Then asked each one to turn it into a cinematic 3D globe as a single HTML file. Outputs: Sonnet 5: 9.8k tokens, $0.10 Fable 5: 15k tokens, $0.77 Sonnet 5 came in 87% cheaper. It drew the routes, but the planet underneath them barely exists: a dark wireframe with the arcs floating in space. Fable 5 built an actual Earth: textured oceans, ice caps, atmospheric glow. Mythos-class models are truly a masterpiece. Docs, guides & setup below:

AI/ML API

498,492 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The first human data marketplace has just crossed over 1 billion uploads. Tens of thousands of structured and labeled datasets across all human activity. We are on track to do over 5 billion uploads this year, officially cementing our place as the largest opt in human data collection effort in history. This belongs to every person who chose to own their data. Thank you. Download Kled on the app store today.

The first human data marketplace has just crossed over 1 billion uploads. Tens of thousands of structured and labeled datasets across all human activity. We are on track to do over 5 billion uploads this year, officially cementing our place as the largest opt in human data collection effort in history. This belongs to every person who chose to own their data. Thank you. Download Kled on the app store today.

Kled AI

128,157 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The most important technology of our time is being built in private, but we're funding the alternative: $42M for the people building AGI in the open. Whether it's the model, weights, code, data, or evals, AI should belong to the people it serves, run on hardware they own, and reach the cheapest phone on earth. Here’s a few of the use cases we want to back ↓

The most important technology of our time is being built in private, but we're funding the alternative: $42M for the people building AGI in the open. Whether it's the model, weights, code, data, or evals, AI should belong to the people it serves, run on hardware they own, and reach the cheapest phone on earth. Here’s a few of the use cases we want to back ↓

Sentient Foundation

91,893 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

META is building 10 gas-fired power plants for its Hyperion AI data center in Louisiana. They will use as much power as 5 million American homes & pollute the equivalent of 5+ million cars on the road per year. These are the same people who tell you not to drive or run your AC because of climate change.

META is building 10 gas-fired power plants for its Hyperion AI data center in Louisiana. They will use as much power as 5 million American homes & pollute the equivalent of 5+ million cars on the road per year. These are the same people who tell you not to drive or run your AC because of climate change.

Valerie Anne Smith

56,080 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

I take partial blame along with the rest of the industry. We did not communicate the difference between a data center built in Virginia 20 years ago and what we're building now. Most data centers today don't use more water than a golf course, and so that's a huge package of misinformation. Additionally, everybody has to bring their own power. The major benefit to that is we need more power in America. Not just data centers, we need overall power. In Utah for example, I have to bring my own power and build power not only for the data center, but to give back to the community to keep power costs down. That's a major benefit. That's gonna happen across the country.

I take partial blame along with the rest of the industry. We did not communicate the difference between a data center built in Virginia 20 years ago and what we're building now. Most data centers today don't use more water than a golf course, and so that's a huge package of misinformation. Additionally, everybody has to bring their own power. The major benefit to that is we need more power in America. Not just data centers, we need overall power. In Utah for example, I have to bring my own power and build power not only for the data center, but to give back to the community to keep power costs down. That's a major benefit. That's gonna happen across the country.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

49,483 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Two months ago on Core Memory, Sam Altman called out Anthropic's "fear based marketing" (wrt mythos/Fable) and their intent to gatekeep AI This week alone, Dario has gone on record repeatedly about wanting to slow AI progress Anthropic silently degraded AI-research queries to Fable (they changed course on this, but they still thought it was a good idea) And now that the government is taking them at their word, they're trying to drag GPT-5.5 and OpenAI down with them Yes, the administration is being heavy-handed, but unfortunatley it's the logical end of telling everyone you built a "nuke" and that it's possible for people to use it against us All I'll say is I think it's possible for an institution to both be filled with good people and misaligned. It's not mutually exclusive Sam saw this in April.

Two months ago on Core Memory, Sam Altman called out Anthropic's "fear based marketing" (wrt mythos/Fable) and their intent to gatekeep AI This week alone, Dario has gone on record repeatedly about wanting to slow AI progress Anthropic silently degraded AI-research queries to Fable (they changed course on this, but they still thought it was a good idea) And now that the government is taking them at their word, they're trying to drag GPT-5.5 and OpenAI down with them Yes, the administration is being heavy-handed, but unfortunatley it's the logical end of telling everyone you built a "nuke" and that it's possible for people to use it against us All I'll say is I think it's possible for an institution to both be filled with good people and misaligned. It's not mutually exclusive Sam saw this in April.

Max

28,440 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten