Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Even Germany now grants asylum seekers "temporary" residency visas, expecting them to return home when safe (eg Syria). But Denmark offers the best model for stopping illegal immigration. It's reduced asylum applications to 1990s levels. Clip from my recent speech: 🧵3/5

RafHM's profile picture

Rafe Heydel-Mankoo

61,245 subscribers

18,131 просмотров • 3 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Victoria Derbyshire speaks with an asylum seeker from Iran, Nima Moradi "When I left my country, I wasn't thinking about the destination, I was thinking about being safe" "When I was in Greece I was thinking to go to Germany, but when I was granted asylum I thought, because I can speak English, I will go to England" "The Rwanda bill will not stop asylum seekers coming to the UK.. See how many people are trying to cross the channel last night.. People have access to information.. They know the bill has passed.. But still they will try to cross the channel.. Because they will think that they won't be amongst the 1% selected to go to Rwanda" "If there was a safe route for me to claim asylum.. For example if the UK had a center I could claim asylum.. I would do that instead of paying people smugglers £3,000 but I crossed because there was no safe route to apply for asylum"
5:43

Victoria Derbyshire speaks with an asylum seeker from Iran, Nima Moradi "When I left my country, I wasn't thinking about the destination, I was thinking about being safe" "When I was in Greece I was thinking to go to Germany, but when I was granted asylum I thought, because I can speak English, I will go to England" "The Rwanda bill will not stop asylum seekers coming to the UK.. See how many people are trying to cross the channel last night.. People have access to information.. They know the bill has passed.. But still they will try to cross the channel.. Because they will think that they won't be amongst the 1% selected to go to Rwanda" "If there was a safe route for me to claim asylum.. For example if the UK had a center I could claim asylum.. I would do that instead of paying people smugglers £3,000 but I crossed because there was no safe route to apply for asylum"

Farrukh

1,042,448 просмотров • 2 лет назад

I've been saying this long before the earthquakes: Venezuela was not safe to return to then, and it certainly isn't safe now. That's why I've consistently supported TPS for people who cannot safely return home. But we can't keep relying on temporary fixes forever. It's time for Congress to pass real immigration reform.
0:53

I've been saying this long before the earthquakes: Venezuela was not safe to return to then, and it certainly isn't safe now. That's why I've consistently supported TPS for people who cannot safely return home. But we can't keep relying on temporary fixes forever. It's time for Congress to pass real immigration reform.

Rep. María Elvira Salazar

89,131 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Channel 4 News cover the creation and rise of hotels for asylum seekers Your reminder that it was the Conservative government that created this problem by stopping the processing of asylum seeker applications because they thought their Rwanda scheme which only send 4 volunteers to Rwanda was the solution to the UK being outside the EU with Brexit and unable to return asylum seekers back to the first country they entered the EU as we were no long party to the Dublin agreement, which in turn is the reason why so many asylum seekers come to the UK on small boats because they know that outside the EU the mechanism to return them no longer exists I.e. all of this was created by the Conservatives and Labour are now in. the process of trying to fix this, and while they've done some positive things they still have a long way to go, including doing the thing which they repeatedly called for in opposition but still haven't done in government: safe and legal routes
5:03

Channel 4 News cover the creation and rise of hotels for asylum seekers Your reminder that it was the Conservative government that created this problem by stopping the processing of asylum seeker applications because they thought their Rwanda scheme which only send 4 volunteers to Rwanda was the solution to the UK being outside the EU with Brexit and unable to return asylum seekers back to the first country they entered the EU as we were no long party to the Dublin agreement, which in turn is the reason why so many asylum seekers come to the UK on small boats because they know that outside the EU the mechanism to return them no longer exists I.e. all of this was created by the Conservatives and Labour are now in. the process of trying to fix this, and while they've done some positive things they still have a long way to go, including doing the thing which they repeatedly called for in opposition but still haven't done in government: safe and legal routes

Farrukh

13,885 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

🚨🇬🇧 BRITAIN'S MIGRATION MATH JUST FLIPPED: ASYLUM SEEKERS NOW DRIVE THE NUMBERS Britain's net migration plummeted to 204,000 while asylum claims hit 110,000, a record that reveals everything about modern immigration's transformation. Asylum seekers now constitute 44% of net migration, double their pre-Brexit share. This isn't just statistical noise; it's complete demographic inversion where refugees replace workers, dependence replaces contribution. The economic implications are brutal. Skilled worker visas collapsed while asylum claims exploded. Workers who pay taxes and fill critical roles are leaving. People requiring immediate support, housing, and benefits are arriving. The math just ain't mathing. Here's what's actually happening. Foreign workers who came during Britain's post-Brexit labor shortage are going home, their visas expired, opportunities exhausted. Meanwhile, 40,000 asylum seekers arrived by small boats this year alone, each costing taxpayers £65,000 annually in hotels, processing, and support. That's £2.6 billion for boat arrivals alone, not counting the 70,000 who claimed asylum through other routes. The transformation accelerated under deliberate policy. Safe routes expanded, processing slowed, removals essentially stopped. Britain went from importing engineers and nurses to warehousing asylum seekers in hotels across every constituency. Communities that needed skilled workers got dependents instead. This isn't sustainable mathematics. When nearly half your immigration requires full public support while your economy needs contributors, you're managing decline, not growth. Britain's choosing humanitarian theater over economic reality. Source: DailyMail
0:28

🚨🇬🇧 BRITAIN'S MIGRATION MATH JUST FLIPPED: ASYLUM SEEKERS NOW DRIVE THE NUMBERS Britain's net migration plummeted to 204,000 while asylum claims hit 110,000, a record that reveals everything about modern immigration's transformation. Asylum seekers now constitute 44% of net migration, double their pre-Brexit share. This isn't just statistical noise; it's complete demographic inversion where refugees replace workers, dependence replaces contribution. The economic implications are brutal. Skilled worker visas collapsed while asylum claims exploded. Workers who pay taxes and fill critical roles are leaving. People requiring immediate support, housing, and benefits are arriving. The math just ain't mathing. Here's what's actually happening. Foreign workers who came during Britain's post-Brexit labor shortage are going home, their visas expired, opportunities exhausted. Meanwhile, 40,000 asylum seekers arrived by small boats this year alone, each costing taxpayers £65,000 annually in hotels, processing, and support. That's £2.6 billion for boat arrivals alone, not counting the 70,000 who claimed asylum through other routes. The transformation accelerated under deliberate policy. Safe routes expanded, processing slowed, removals essentially stopped. Britain went from importing engineers and nurses to warehousing asylum seekers in hotels across every constituency. Communities that needed skilled workers got dependents instead. This isn't sustainable mathematics. When nearly half your immigration requires full public support while your economy needs contributors, you're managing decline, not growth. Britain's choosing humanitarian theater over economic reality. Source: DailyMail

Mario Nawfal

273,900 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Unelected bureaucrat David Cameron explains how we need the Rwanda plan because of Brexit 🤦‍♂️ Anushka Asthana, "Hand on heart. If this had come up when you were PM, would you have gone with this Rwanda policy?" David Cameron, "We had a situation where you could return people directly to France.. People land on a beach in Kent, you take them straight back to France.. You therefore break the model of the people smugglers" Anushka Asthana, "Shouldn't you be trying to get that?" David Cameron, "That's not available at the moment" Anushka Asthana, "Because of Brexit?" David Cameron, "(Yes) Because of the situation we are in (having left the EU)" The UK has participated in the Dublin process since it was inaugurated in 1990. When the UK left the EU, the UK left the Dublin agreement and we no longer have the automatic right to return asylum seekers back to France. So Brexit was to take back control from unelected bureaucrats, and here we have David Cameron an unelected bureaucrat in charge of our foreign policy. And Brexit was about taking control of our borders and asylum seekers, and we've lost the ability to return asylum seekers to France, and instead have to spend over £1,000,000 to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, in a 1 in 1 out policy i.e. for every asylum seeker we send to Rwanda, they send us one of their asylum seekers, so we don't have fewer asylum seekers, we're just shuffling asylum seekers around. Hundreds of millions for a PR campaign to appease racists while there is a cost of living crisis in the UK and millions of Brits living in poverty. Disgraceful.
0:33

Unelected bureaucrat David Cameron explains how we need the Rwanda plan because of Brexit 🤦‍♂️ Anushka Asthana, "Hand on heart. If this had come up when you were PM, would you have gone with this Rwanda policy?" David Cameron, "We had a situation where you could return people directly to France.. People land on a beach in Kent, you take them straight back to France.. You therefore break the model of the people smugglers" Anushka Asthana, "Shouldn't you be trying to get that?" David Cameron, "That's not available at the moment" Anushka Asthana, "Because of Brexit?" David Cameron, "(Yes) Because of the situation we are in (having left the EU)" The UK has participated in the Dublin process since it was inaugurated in 1990. When the UK left the EU, the UK left the Dublin agreement and we no longer have the automatic right to return asylum seekers back to France. So Brexit was to take back control from unelected bureaucrats, and here we have David Cameron an unelected bureaucrat in charge of our foreign policy. And Brexit was about taking control of our borders and asylum seekers, and we've lost the ability to return asylum seekers to France, and instead have to spend over £1,000,000 to send asylum seekers to Rwanda, in a 1 in 1 out policy i.e. for every asylum seeker we send to Rwanda, they send us one of their asylum seekers, so we don't have fewer asylum seekers, we're just shuffling asylum seekers around. Hundreds of millions for a PR campaign to appease racists while there is a cost of living crisis in the UK and millions of Brits living in poverty. Disgraceful.

Farrukh

1,117,227 просмотров • 2 лет назад

2024: Rishi Sunak, "We've processed more asylum seekers last year than in the last two decades" 2023: Whistleblower on Channel 4 News, "The Conservative gov have cut down the number of experienced interviewers and they're replacing them with inexperienced people.. Someone working for Greggs, unemployed, next week they're interviewing asylum seekers" First thing to note is that Rishi Sunak has now acknowledged that over the past 14 years of Conservative party rule, their plans mean fewer asylum seeker applications were processed i.e. they created the asylum backlog The second thing to note is that tick boxing asylum applications without reading the details and making a proper evaluation isn't processing applications, it's tick boxing so Sunak can make his statement of processing so many applications The third thing to note is that when Rishi Sunak said he would outsource sick notes away from GPs - the people who actually know whether you are suitable to be off sick or not, this tick boxing of asylum seeker applications is an example of outsourcing, which means the quality of service will be another layer of red tape that will cost more, deliver less, put more stress on the disabled, and the only winners will be the donors who secure the contract
0:36

2024: Rishi Sunak, "We've processed more asylum seekers last year than in the last two decades" 2023: Whistleblower on Channel 4 News, "The Conservative gov have cut down the number of experienced interviewers and they're replacing them with inexperienced people.. Someone working for Greggs, unemployed, next week they're interviewing asylum seekers" First thing to note is that Rishi Sunak has now acknowledged that over the past 14 years of Conservative party rule, their plans mean fewer asylum seeker applications were processed i.e. they created the asylum backlog The second thing to note is that tick boxing asylum applications without reading the details and making a proper evaluation isn't processing applications, it's tick boxing so Sunak can make his statement of processing so many applications The third thing to note is that when Rishi Sunak said he would outsource sick notes away from GPs - the people who actually know whether you are suitable to be off sick or not, this tick boxing of asylum seeker applications is an example of outsourcing, which means the quality of service will be another layer of red tape that will cost more, deliver less, put more stress on the disabled, and the only winners will be the donors who secure the contract

Farrukh

306,603 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This really is a symbol of everything wrong with modern Ireland. Demolishing a family home during a housing crisis because it violated planning laws. But the official government policy for housing asylum seekers is to bypass planning laws. In 2022 the government introduced a law allowing any number of facilities including hospitals, army barracks, shops, hotels, and even places of worship to be used for asylum seeker housing. Basically they exempted every structure in Ireland from planning laws as long as it was housing asylum seekers. That law has been extended to the end of 2028. One rule for Irish people, another when it comes to foreigners.
0:33

This really is a symbol of everything wrong with modern Ireland. Demolishing a family home during a housing crisis because it violated planning laws. But the official government policy for housing asylum seekers is to bypass planning laws. In 2022 the government introduced a law allowing any number of facilities including hospitals, army barracks, shops, hotels, and even places of worship to be used for asylum seeker housing. Basically they exempted every structure in Ireland from planning laws as long as it was housing asylum seekers. That law has been extended to the end of 2028. One rule for Irish people, another when it comes to foreigners.

MichaeloKeeffe

19,365 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

European immigration reform is coming after mass migration has destroyed the west - In Denmark, upon entry, asylum seekers must hand over their jewelry to reimbursed taxpayers - Finland proposed limiting undocumented adults to emergency health care - In Britain: They must speak English to ‘A’ level standard. They must have no debt in this country. Britain also intends to require refugees wait 20 years, not 5, to survive for legal status despite opposition - Sweden considers a snitch law requiring some government agencies alert police when encountering suspected illegal immigrants - Germany and Poland installed check points all ports of entry - Hungary erected razor wire on its border with Serbia “A dozen European countries are considering deporting immigrants to return hubs in nations they have no connection to, like Albania, which agreed to accept asylum seekers from Italy for processing and detention. In 2023, just one in five immigrants order deported actually left the EU. So like the U.S. some governments here are trying to balance their labor needs with the voter backlash on illegal immigration.”
2:01

European immigration reform is coming after mass migration has destroyed the west - In Denmark, upon entry, asylum seekers must hand over their jewelry to reimbursed taxpayers - Finland proposed limiting undocumented adults to emergency health care - In Britain: They must speak English to ‘A’ level standard. They must have no debt in this country. Britain also intends to require refugees wait 20 years, not 5, to survive for legal status despite opposition - Sweden considers a snitch law requiring some government agencies alert police when encountering suspected illegal immigrants - Germany and Poland installed check points all ports of entry - Hungary erected razor wire on its border with Serbia “A dozen European countries are considering deporting immigrants to return hubs in nations they have no connection to, like Albania, which agreed to accept asylum seekers from Italy for processing and detention. In 2023, just one in five immigrants order deported actually left the EU. So like the U.S. some governments here are trying to balance their labor needs with the voter backlash on illegal immigration.”

Wall Street Apes

411,073 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Updated numbers on Donald Trumps new major immigration policy change All immigrants in the US on temporary visas, students, H-1B workers, tourists and more, who want to apply for a green card must now leave the US New numbers show this effects 780,000+ immigrants in the country Exceptions exist for “extraordinary circumstances,” certain dual-intent visas, or specific categories, but the default is now return home Here’s the reasoning USCIS frames this as returning to the “original intent” of immigration law. Temporary visas are for temporary stays, they were never meant as a backdoor to permanent residency People have been coming over to America, bringing their entire families and then waiting on Visas, that all ends Here’s who it effects most - People on nonimmigrant visas (H-1B workers, F-1 students changing status, K-1 fiancés and more - Family-based applicants already in the US - Employment-based But it’s not everyone Immediate relatives of US citizens can be an exception. But this ends an immigrant getting a visa, bringing over their whole family and drawing out visa processes for years Most Americans I think right now would be more happy with zero immigration going forward but this is a good step. Remove them all
3:32

Updated numbers on Donald Trumps new major immigration policy change All immigrants in the US on temporary visas, students, H-1B workers, tourists and more, who want to apply for a green card must now leave the US New numbers show this effects 780,000+ immigrants in the country Exceptions exist for “extraordinary circumstances,” certain dual-intent visas, or specific categories, but the default is now return home Here’s the reasoning USCIS frames this as returning to the “original intent” of immigration law. Temporary visas are for temporary stays, they were never meant as a backdoor to permanent residency People have been coming over to America, bringing their entire families and then waiting on Visas, that all ends Here’s who it effects most - People on nonimmigrant visas (H-1B workers, F-1 students changing status, K-1 fiancés and more - Family-based applicants already in the US - Employment-based But it’s not everyone Immediate relatives of US citizens can be an exception. But this ends an immigrant getting a visa, bringing over their whole family and drawing out visa processes for years Most Americans I think right now would be more happy with zero immigration going forward but this is a good step. Remove them all

Wall Street Apes

138,188 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Man with slick hair, "I find it quite disgusting how we're talking about human beings who are genuinely.. And it's not illegal to claim asylum in a foreign country" "Saying they're illegal immigrants.. They're asylum seekers and refugees" #BBCQT "Illegal immigrants tend to be people who come here legally and overstay a visa, or an application. That's the majority of illegal immigrants" "We know other countries take on a lot more refugees than we ever do" "Calling these people: the invaders" "Or dehumanising them so we can point a finger at them saying: you're the reason we have a housing shortage.. But we've only built 250,000 council houses since Thatcher came into power.. Before that we built 5 million" "Why do people claim that immigrants are the problem when it's recent governments that are the problem"
1:10

Man with slick hair, "I find it quite disgusting how we're talking about human beings who are genuinely.. And it's not illegal to claim asylum in a foreign country" "Saying they're illegal immigrants.. They're asylum seekers and refugees" #BBCQT "Illegal immigrants tend to be people who come here legally and overstay a visa, or an application. That's the majority of illegal immigrants" "We know other countries take on a lot more refugees than we ever do" "Calling these people: the invaders" "Or dehumanising them so we can point a finger at them saying: you're the reason we have a housing shortage.. But we've only built 250,000 council houses since Thatcher came into power.. Before that we built 5 million" "Why do people claim that immigrants are the problem when it's recent governments that are the problem"

Farrukh

1,448,303 просмотров • 1 год назад

I Don’t Even Know What To Say Anymore Pima County, Arizona is running an illegal migrant aid program funded through FEMA money. Providing shelter, goods & transportation to their next destinations Reminder there was ESSENTIALLY NO FEMA MONEY available for the Maui Fire Victims “At border towns in Arizona may be dealing with a new immigration problem. Pima County received $12,000,000 from FEMA in 2023. With these funds, city officials and nongovernmental organizations have been providing transportation and shelters to asylum seekers until they get to their next destination.” NEW: Pima County and Arizona are requesting FEMA money for asylum seeker aid programs Pima County has been running an aid program for asylum seekers and migrants released by the Border Patrol across southern Arizona to pursue immigration cases in the U.S. since 2019. Pima County and the state of Arizona are submitting new applications this week for the next round of federal funding for asylum seeker care programs. Pima County has been running an aid program for asylum seekers and migrants released by the Border Patrol across southern Arizona to pursue immigration cases in the U.S. since 2019. It is largely funded through a FEMA program that Pima county and others apply to get a share of throughout the year. The county received almost $22 million from FEMA in April. Arizona Congress Rep Grijalva says now they likely have enough funds to take the program at least through the end of 2024. The latest funding request is due this month and Grijalva says whatever money they're awarded will be used to keep the program afloat next year and ensure resources make it to Pima County.
1:30

I Don’t Even Know What To Say Anymore Pima County, Arizona is running an illegal migrant aid program funded through FEMA money. Providing shelter, goods & transportation to their next destinations Reminder there was ESSENTIALLY NO FEMA MONEY available for the Maui Fire Victims “At border towns in Arizona may be dealing with a new immigration problem. Pima County received $12,000,000 from FEMA in 2023. With these funds, city officials and nongovernmental organizations have been providing transportation and shelters to asylum seekers until they get to their next destination.” NEW: Pima County and Arizona are requesting FEMA money for asylum seeker aid programs Pima County has been running an aid program for asylum seekers and migrants released by the Border Patrol across southern Arizona to pursue immigration cases in the U.S. since 2019. Pima County and the state of Arizona are submitting new applications this week for the next round of federal funding for asylum seeker care programs. Pima County has been running an aid program for asylum seekers and migrants released by the Border Patrol across southern Arizona to pursue immigration cases in the U.S. since 2019. It is largely funded through a FEMA program that Pima county and others apply to get a share of throughout the year. The county received almost $22 million from FEMA in April. Arizona Congress Rep Grijalva says now they likely have enough funds to take the program at least through the end of 2024. The latest funding request is due this month and Grijalva says whatever money they're awarded will be used to keep the program afloat next year and ensure resources make it to Pima County.

Wall Street Apes

207,166 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Lewiston Maine School Board - 1000 Students?! Enrollment May Permanently Plummet Due To ICE They first talked about remote learning to protect the illegal foreigners/students - but claim it's not effective due to behavior issues & language/speech. Districts w/ high levels of illegal foreigners are all discussing the long-term impacts of self-deportation or relocating to "safer" states. *When you look at the data for some of these districts, it's staggering. Much of the student population are illegal foreigners pipelined in from Africa or the middle east. ICE activity led to many of them staying home. **Certain districts in Maine have been artificially existing via illegal immigration. It appears they are now coming to terms with what is happening.
0:27

Lewiston Maine School Board - 1000 Students?! Enrollment May Permanently Plummet Due To ICE They first talked about remote learning to protect the illegal foreigners/students - but claim it's not effective due to behavior issues & language/speech. Districts w/ high levels of illegal foreigners are all discussing the long-term impacts of self-deportation or relocating to "safer" states. *When you look at the data for some of these districts, it's staggering. Much of the student population are illegal foreigners pipelined in from Africa or the middle east. ICE activity led to many of them staying home. **Certain districts in Maine have been artificially existing via illegal immigration. It appears they are now coming to terms with what is happening.

TheUnquirer

16,752 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🇬🇧 WHISTLEBLOWER: FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS ARE VANISHING FROM HOTELS DAILY A whistleblower working in migrant hotels says the number of failed asylum seekers disappearing every day is “terrifying.” The contractor described total “chaos” and a system that quietly logs absconders but does little else. Once someone’s asylum claim is rejected, they’re given a move-out date and many simply walk out before enforcement ever shows up. They’re marked as “left the hotel,” and the Home Office gets a notification. That’s it. The Home Office says nearly 50,000 people with no right to stay have been removed and that enforcement arrests are at record levels. But a new National Audit Office report shows the government doesn’t even know how many have absconded or where most rejected asylum seekers are now. Hotel use has surged, with over 36,000 migrants currently living in taxpayer-funded accommodation. The asylum system cost the UK £4.9 billion last year - not including legal aid or local council support. Only 9% of rejected applicants tracked in one study were actually deported. The rest? Some were approved later, many remain in limbo, and thousands may be lost in the system. Source: Sky News, Daily Mail
0:47

🇬🇧 WHISTLEBLOWER: FAILED ASYLUM SEEKERS ARE VANISHING FROM HOTELS DAILY A whistleblower working in migrant hotels says the number of failed asylum seekers disappearing every day is “terrifying.” The contractor described total “chaos” and a system that quietly logs absconders but does little else. Once someone’s asylum claim is rejected, they’re given a move-out date and many simply walk out before enforcement ever shows up. They’re marked as “left the hotel,” and the Home Office gets a notification. That’s it. The Home Office says nearly 50,000 people with no right to stay have been removed and that enforcement arrests are at record levels. But a new National Audit Office report shows the government doesn’t even know how many have absconded or where most rejected asylum seekers are now. Hotel use has surged, with over 36,000 migrants currently living in taxpayer-funded accommodation. The asylum system cost the UK £4.9 billion last year - not including legal aid or local council support. Only 9% of rejected applicants tracked in one study were actually deported. The rest? Some were approved later, many remain in limbo, and thousands may be lost in the system. Source: Sky News, Daily Mail

Mario Nawfal

29,684 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🧵 UK Hotels That Housed Asylum Seekers — Now Reopened to the Public (2023–2025) Some hotels used by the Home Office have now returned to normal guest use. Here are confirmed cases: 👇 1. Novotel, Ipswich Used: Oct 2022 – Jan 2024 Reopened: Early 2024 ✅ Back to public bookings after refurbishment. 2. Wiltshire Hotel, Royal Wootton Bassett Used: Over 1 year until early 2024 Reopened: April 2024 ✅ Fully open to guests again. 3. Copthorne Hotel, Cardiff Used: For asylum seekers + local housing Reopened: 19 May 2025 ✅ Refurbished and returned to public use. 4. Hilton Garden Inn, Snowdonia Used: Nov 2022 – Feb 2023 Reopened: 6 Feb 2023 ✅ Now operating as a holiday hotel again. 5. Stradey Park Hotel, Llanelli Planned asylum use scrapped after protests Reopened: June 2024 ✅ Now back to normal hotel operations. 💬 Around 200+ hotels were used across the UK — only some have reopened so far.
2:00

🧵 UK Hotels That Housed Asylum Seekers — Now Reopened to the Public (2023–2025) Some hotels used by the Home Office have now returned to normal guest use. Here are confirmed cases: 👇 1. Novotel, Ipswich Used: Oct 2022 – Jan 2024 Reopened: Early 2024 ✅ Back to public bookings after refurbishment. 2. Wiltshire Hotel, Royal Wootton Bassett Used: Over 1 year until early 2024 Reopened: April 2024 ✅ Fully open to guests again. 3. Copthorne Hotel, Cardiff Used: For asylum seekers + local housing Reopened: 19 May 2025 ✅ Refurbished and returned to public use. 4. Hilton Garden Inn, Snowdonia Used: Nov 2022 – Feb 2023 Reopened: 6 Feb 2023 ✅ Now operating as a holiday hotel again. 5. Stradey Park Hotel, Llanelli Planned asylum use scrapped after protests Reopened: June 2024 ✅ Now back to normal hotel operations. 💬 Around 200+ hotels were used across the UK — only some have reopened so far.

Sue 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

101,603 просмотров • 1 год назад

JUST IN: Biden revives Trump executive order on illegal immigration into the United States, says, "Today, I am moving past Republican obstruction and utilizing the executive authorities available to me as President to address the border issue. Ideally, I would have preferred to tackle this through bipartisan legislation, as that's the only sustainable way to fix our broken system, hire more border patrol agents, asylum officers, and judges. However, Republicans have left me with no choice. "I am announcing actions to bar migrants who cross our southern border unlawfully from receiving asylum. Migrants will be restricted from receiving asylum at our southern border unless they seek it through an established lawful process. For those who come to the United States legally, for example, by making an appointment and arriving at a port of entry, asylum will still be available. "However, if an individual chooses not to use our legal pathways and comes without permission, against the law, they will be restricted from receiving asylum and staying in the United States. This action will help us gain control of our border and restore order to the process. "This ban will remain in place until the number of people trying to enter illegally is reduced to a manageable level for our system. We will carry out this order consistent with all our responsibilities under international law." EARLIER, I WROTE: President Biden has just issued a new executive order that prevents migrants from seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border when daily crossings exceed 2,500. The order allows for the quick return of migrants and will only reopen the border to asylum seekers when crossings drop below 1,500 daily for a week, plus an additional two-week wait. This move addresses voter concerns and mirrors a blocked 2018 policy by President Trump.
1:31

JUST IN: Biden revives Trump executive order on illegal immigration into the United States, says, "Today, I am moving past Republican obstruction and utilizing the executive authorities available to me as President to address the border issue. Ideally, I would have preferred to tackle this through bipartisan legislation, as that's the only sustainable way to fix our broken system, hire more border patrol agents, asylum officers, and judges. However, Republicans have left me with no choice. "I am announcing actions to bar migrants who cross our southern border unlawfully from receiving asylum. Migrants will be restricted from receiving asylum at our southern border unless they seek it through an established lawful process. For those who come to the United States legally, for example, by making an appointment and arriving at a port of entry, asylum will still be available. "However, if an individual chooses not to use our legal pathways and comes without permission, against the law, they will be restricted from receiving asylum and staying in the United States. This action will help us gain control of our border and restore order to the process. "This ban will remain in place until the number of people trying to enter illegally is reduced to a manageable level for our system. We will carry out this order consistent with all our responsibilities under international law." EARLIER, I WROTE: President Biden has just issued a new executive order that prevents migrants from seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border when daily crossings exceed 2,500. The order allows for the quick return of migrants and will only reopen the border to asylum seekers when crossings drop below 1,500 daily for a week, plus an additional two-week wait. This move addresses voter concerns and mirrors a blocked 2018 policy by President Trump.

Simon Ateba

2,531,379 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Migrant hotel in U.K. forced to remove 'asylum seekers' after protests and legal challenge 🇬🇧 Approximately 140 migrants must leave The Bell Hotel by September 12 after a temporary injunction preventing the hotel from housing them was granted by the U.K. High Court. On last night's episode of The Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 Show, independent journalist (Jack Hadfield 🇬🇧) Jack Hadfield provided an update on a controversial hotel being used to house migrants in Epping, England. The Bell Hotel — which has been the site of protests in recent weeks — will now be forced to find alternative accommodation for the 'asylum seekers' currently residing in the building after a temporary court injunction was granted following backlash from residents and the local town council. Protests erupted outside the hotel after an 'asylum seeker' staying at the taxpayer-funded residence was recently charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in the town. The hotel has until September 12 to remove the migrants according to the ruling. Reform UK Leader Nigel Farage MP applauded local residents and the town council for their bravery in bringing about change, according to reporting from the BBC. Ezra explained why it's unsurprising the hotel housing dozens of military-aged migrant men faced pushback from concerned local residents. "To turn temporary hotel lodgings into a permanent place for 200 men, of course that's going to trigger some planning issues," he said. "I've seen that other towns are going to copy this legal precedent. They're going to challenge the hotels on a planning basis. I think this could spread," Ezra continued. Multiple protests across the U.K. have been sparked in recent weeks as unrestrained immigration continues to be a pressing issue for millions of British residents.
9:54

Migrant hotel in U.K. forced to remove 'asylum seekers' after protests and legal challenge 🇬🇧 Approximately 140 migrants must leave The Bell Hotel by September 12 after a temporary injunction preventing the hotel from housing them was granted by the U.K. High Court. On last night's episode of The Ezra Levant 🍁🚛 Show, independent journalist (Jack Hadfield 🇬🇧) Jack Hadfield provided an update on a controversial hotel being used to house migrants in Epping, England. The Bell Hotel — which has been the site of protests in recent weeks — will now be forced to find alternative accommodation for the 'asylum seekers' currently residing in the building after a temporary court injunction was granted following backlash from residents and the local town council. Protests erupted outside the hotel after an 'asylum seeker' staying at the taxpayer-funded residence was recently charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in the town. The hotel has until September 12 to remove the migrants according to the ruling. Reform UK Leader Nigel Farage MP applauded local residents and the town council for their bravery in bringing about change, according to reporting from the BBC. Ezra explained why it's unsurprising the hotel housing dozens of military-aged migrant men faced pushback from concerned local residents. "To turn temporary hotel lodgings into a permanent place for 200 men, of course that's going to trigger some planning issues," he said. "I've seen that other towns are going to copy this legal precedent. They're going to challenge the hotels on a planning basis. I think this could spread," Ezra continued. Multiple protests across the U.K. have been sparked in recent weeks as unrestrained immigration continues to be a pressing issue for millions of British residents.

Rebel News

12,219 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Just when you thought Donald J. Trump's deportation machine couldn't get any more lawless and cruel, ICE is now changing tactics and arresting people who have been granted asylum hearings. This means that even when the judge is denying the federal government's motion to dismiss + giving asylum seekers a hearing, ICE is still disappearing them DESPITE the judge's ruling. Any pretense of "due process" has been thrown out the window. This is both a violation of US and international law that demands immediate attention from all New York elected officials & underscores the urgent need for legal service providers to be present at all of these cases.
2:11

Just when you thought Donald J. Trump's deportation machine couldn't get any more lawless and cruel, ICE is now changing tactics and arresting people who have been granted asylum hearings. This means that even when the judge is denying the federal government's motion to dismiss + giving asylum seekers a hearing, ICE is still disappearing them DESPITE the judge's ruling. Any pretense of "due process" has been thrown out the window. This is both a violation of US and international law that demands immediate attention from all New York elected officials & underscores the urgent need for legal service providers to be present at all of these cases.

Office of New York City Comptroller Brad Lander

34,217 просмотров • 1 год назад

TPS was never meant to be a permanent immigration policy. Our broken immigration system needs lasting solutions from Congress, not endless temporary extensions. But Congress created TPS for extraordinary circumstances when it is unsafe for people to return home. That is exactly what Venezuela is facing today after the devastating earthquakes. The law is clear. The Administration should redesignate TPS for Venezuelans already in the United States for 18 months while Venezuela recovers. That's not expanding TPS beyond its purpose. It's applying the law exactly as Congress intended.
0:53

TPS was never meant to be a permanent immigration policy. Our broken immigration system needs lasting solutions from Congress, not endless temporary extensions. But Congress created TPS for extraordinary circumstances when it is unsafe for people to return home. That is exactly what Venezuela is facing today after the devastating earthquakes. The law is clear. The Administration should redesignate TPS for Venezuelans already in the United States for 18 months while Venezuela recovers. That's not expanding TPS beyond its purpose. It's applying the law exactly as Congress intended.

María Elvira Salazar 🇺🇸

31,358 просмотров • 29 дней назад