Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Even the globe model doesn’t actually claim the sky reverses—is it just confusing optical effect with actual observation?

20,787 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Todays stream will be fun. So a few fellas on Twitter made this video and then posted it to desperately make me sound like a fool. This gun even explained it in “layman’s terms” in an act of kindness to even penetrate the deranged grift motivated shell of a failed and frankly retarded former comedian. Take note of the specific claims. It’s why wizards just attack, use in group intentionally confusing language, and avoid any potential falsification scenarios. Fortunately this specific video is relatively clear with claims. 1 the earth moves under an object once it no longer is “connected” to the ground. So the claim in layman’s terms means that the atmosphere and air surrounding the earth is not connected to the spin of the earth. Since the bullet clearly never leaves the atmosphere. 2 distance is “1000.” Rather that’s feet or meters it doesn’t matter. A major mistake by a wizard is staring any actual testable number. This ensures that once shown to be false they can’t just claim scale issues. It’s 1000. Not a billion, not a trillion. 1000. 3 direction matters but no mention of latitude. Since the earth spins 1000 mph at equator and 0 mph at the North Pole according to the current mainstream globe model, the latitude you are standing on would change the magnitude of coriolis effect by orders or magnitude regardless of direction. 4 the gun specialist doesn’t explain or calculate what the margin of error is for any shot at that distance with that gun and that specific round. And he has the ability to edit the video any way he sees fit. This gentlemen being demonstrably wrong does not disprove a globe or prove a flat non moving plane. It just disproves the evidence as stated by this man of Coriolis effect. The 24 hour sun in Antarctica does not disprove flat non moving plane or prove spinning ball. It just removes the potential argument for flat earthers and adds credibility to people who claim it would be 24 hours. None of this is personal it’s just a discussion on logic, claims, discernment, and the scientific method. If you are angry or scared by this or you just want to assume my intention and mock then you are of very little use to adult discussion. That includes flat earthers who are now claiming witsit is a clone. It’s pathetic narcissistic behavior. 1230 pm pst

Owen Benjamin 🐻

16,924 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr