正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Even though she got her shot off before 0 seconds, this doesn’t count as a goal because it wasn’t over the goal line in 0 seconds. I get it. Rules are rules, but that rule is whack NCAA Soccer 😂

108,175 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

BOYCOTT William Hill !!!!! So according to William Hill. Lukas Hornicek DIDN’T save this shot from Vicenzo Grifo. Even though- 1. You can clearly see he gets fingertips to it 2. His fingers bend back AFTER touching the ball 3. The ball then slightly changes direction and goes onto the post 4. You even hear the commentators say the keeper got fingertips to it to save it onto the post They even told me if I prove it they’ll escalate it but won’t accept my video as proof 😂😂😂 Even though William Hill and most betting companies state “any shot that is touched onto the post is a shot on target” they’re denying this is a shot on target and even said “the bet wasn’t settled on video footage” I’ve sent them all the proof they need to see it’s a shot on target that the keeper touches onto the post which according to their rules is a shot on target and a save. They’ve not settled this as a save or a shot on target even though he clearly tips it onto the post. They even tried to bend their own rules saying if a keeper tips it onto the post then it’s a “shot” and not a “shot on target” which is a lie They even paid out part of the bet and said “WON” so if they’re adamant it didn’t win then why did they partly pay out ? 😂 It either won or it didn’t win. The fact they’re denying the keeper saved this has meant I didn’t win and I’ll never use them again unless this is resolved. Seen so many tweets like this recently where betting companies are ignoring factual evidence in videos to deny people of their winnings but happy enough to take money straight away off people So do not use William Hill as when you show them proof they deny it, break their own rules and scam customers out of paying them

Rangers Spares

61,718 次观看 • 2 个月前