Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Every Babu who is boot-licking Modi Regime should look at this pathetic state of former Ambassador. No one has used Babus the way Modi has used them in his political journey this far. It started from the Ishrat Jahan encounter case. It is easy to control these ‘wannabes’ through...

29,528 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

BREAKING: Fani Willis faces relentless attacks from Trump and Republicans and is now forced to move around with bodyguards. She even had to leave her home while nobody is defending her, MSNBC's Rachel Rachel Maddow claims, urges Americans to save the rule of law from death today and re-elect Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney who is prosecuting Trump in Georgia. WATCH "She travels with bodyguards, she's been forced to leave her home. All this while former President Trump continues to attack her relentlessly to his supporters, and as Republicans at the county, state, and federal level do everything they can to undermine and impugn and stymie her work and smear her personally. This level of sustained public attack is not usually the price of entry for doing your job as a district attorney. Nor should it be in a country where the rule of law is supposedly the rule. The ability of prosecutors and judges to do their jobs without fear is a fundamental test of our democracy. Whether you like the Georgia criminal case against former President Trump or not, Fani Willis is one of the bellwethers for the rule of law in this country. The history of the rule of law in this country tells us that the rule of law does not magically defend itself. And it is mortal. It can be killed when it is attacked. It breaks. The rule of law in this country, in practical terms, is made up of people doing hard jobs who themselves can break when they are attacked. And right now, you and I, all of us, we are making history in this country. And the history that we are making is that there is no one defending Fani Willis but herself. And in the noble alternate version of this history that we'd like to imagine we would be part of, the whole country would be up in arms about Georgia and about New York and about all of these cases, telling these people to back off the judges, back off the witnesses and the jurors, back off the prosecutors, back off Fonny Willis. Protect these cases. Protect the rule of law. We imagine that's who we are as a country, but we are not showing it. We are not standing up to defend these people, at least not yet. Let's start with the federal government and Jim Jordan. Jim Jordan has time after time after time attacked my office with no legitimate purpose. Anyone who knows Jim Jordan's history knows that he only has the purpose of trying to interfere in a criminal investigation. He has now turned his tricks to, he's going to look at grant programs, which I invite him to do, and we have complied with his subpoenas, but yet he continues his attacks to try to interfere in a criminal investigation while all, while his jurisdiction has one of the worst crime rates, has poverty issues, and not one time has he used his position to try to investigate people who are attacking me and attacking others legitimately, doing their jobs, making him illegitimate in his position. And it's disgusting. And so I bring that up at the federal level because now at the state level, they've decided to follow this clown's lead and they want to now try to interfere in an investigation. And it's not legitimate either. And so it shall fail, and it's not going to go anywhere. But they are trying to attack me at every level."

Simon Ateba

714,278 views • 2 years ago

#WATCH | Gurugram: Author & daughter of former President Pranab Mukherjee, Sharmistha Mukherjee says, "...Mr Modi has been able to provide a strong and stable government which is I think extremely important, especially in today's context when we see this whole geopolitical uncertainty all over the world. So at this time it is absolutely necessary for India to have a strong and stable central government and a strong leadership and I think Mr. Modi is the right person to lead India at this very very critical juncture, especially keeping in mind the world politics." "Whether it's Pandit Nehru, Narendra Modi ji, Indira Gandhi, Narasimha Rao or Dr. Manmohan Singh. So you have to see it from a distance perspective. Every prime minister has contributed to the task of nation building. So in my mind there should not be a competition who did what, nobody is perfect, no government is perfect. But everybody is genuine in their effort and everybody has taken India to a great height. This is the job of the opposition to criticize the government and rightly so. But again, as I said, the right assessment comes after a distance, from a distance. So I don't want to say anything about that. But one thing I would like to say about Narendra Modi Ji that he is perhaps one of the strongest prime ministers in post-independent India who has been able to provide a strong and stable government. During UPA 1, UPA 2, we have seen that coalition politics has its ups and downs. The problem is that the alliance partners, are continuously, in a way, threatening the government. And you can't take any strong policy measures. So Mr Modi has been able to provide a strong and stable government which is I think extremely important, especially in today's context when we see this whole geopolitical uncertainty all over the world. So at this time it is absolutely necessary for India to have a strong and stable central government and a strong leadership and I think Mr. Modi is the right person to lead India at this very very critical juncture, especially keeping in mind the world politics."

ANI

12,848 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING.🚨 Judge Merchan has instructed the jury they do not need to have a *UNANIMOUS* verdict in order to convict former President Donald J. Trump. "One thing in particular that the judge said the jurors could do. He delivered what is being called really the pinnacle of all of this. There is no need to agree on what has occurred. They can disagree on what the crime was among the three choices." "This means they could split 4-4-4 and the judge would still treat them unanimously. What does that mean?" "Outrageous. In a normal criminal case every statutory crime has what we call elements of the offense. Like in a bank robbery case you have to rob – it has to be a financial institution, you have to show intent," said former prosecutor Andrew McCarthy. "Those are the things the jury has to agree on unanimously that they were proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Here what we’re doing is taking the element that actually makes this a felony, because remember falsification of records is normally a misdemeanor in New York. What makes it a felony is that you are concealing or committing another crime." "And here the judge is telling them they don’t have to agree about what the other crime is under circumstances where that not only is what makes this a felony, makes it a four-year potential prison penalty rather than a year or less, but it is also what gets us into the courtroom." "If this had been a misdemeanor, the time to bring this case would have lapsed in 2019. The only reason they are still able to bring this case is because it’s a felony allegedly and yet now the judge is saying you know, you don’t have to agree on what the felony is." The jury has now gone to deliberations.

Kyle Becker

5,835,051 views • 2 years ago

Minister in Presidency Khumbudzo Ntshaveni has rebuked the behaviour of former President Zuma and South Africa’s High Commissioner to India, Anil Sooklal. “ You recall that South Africa has applied for mutual assistance to bring the fugitive Butcher brothers back into the country. Therefore, it's a level of disgrace that our own employee, the representative of the government of South Africa help knobs with the criminals instead of doing his work off to ensure that the fugitives are brought back into South Africa, so that they can face that criminal effect. It is for that reason that the Minister of International Relations and Cooperations, Minister Lamola has not only requested for a report from the official, but has indicated that drastic steps would be taken to make sure that nobody undermines the laws of this country whilst representing this country, in terms of whether we, we, we track, we are aware that there are privileges extended to former state presidents, but government is entitled to review such privileges if they are abused to undermine the laws of this republic. This is not the first instance in relation to this particular state president that he undermines the not only the foreign policy of the country but also the loss of the country when he's supported by the country, but we do not have the itinerant of the former state presidents when they travel. Currently, the privileges are just gives us a request to fund their traveling and whatever, and that we are refuting those issues. We also are very clear that the messaging is very wrong, both from Mister Masada Shukla on his conduct, because he's directly undermining the criminal justice system of this country, and and showing a middle finger to South Africans who pay his salary is that of him performing his task as, as required by the laws of this country, so we'll await the report from the Minister of Deco, and to make sure that necessary steps are taken against Ambassador Shugla, and similarly it's also very disturbing that a former state president can open and unapologetically show the middle finger to South Africans. We have lost a lot of money through the Gupta brothers, shenanigans in our country, and continues to show the middle finger and claims that he wants to run this country again. It shows the type of person he is, and it's for South Africans to judge."

#LordOfTheMedia

52,418 views • 1 month ago