Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Every internal conversation at Rogo is recorded and fed into a company brain called Shrek. "When anyone starts, we say, "Hey, just FYI, you're always being recorded." There's a dashboard where you can see the swamp of everything that people are working on at any given time, but it's...

71,460 views • 6 days ago •via X (Twitter)

7 Comments

Norma's profile picture
Norma6 days ago

Star Trek’s Lieutenant Commander Data is one of the most overwhelmingly popular and beloved characters in the entire Star Trek franchise. Data's unique perspective as an artificial life form trying to understand humanity deeply resonated with audiences. About 37% of American adults consider themselves fans of Star Trek” (Source:Google AI) Trekkies are AI enthusiasts preconditioned by science fiction (e.g. Data) that must somehow now try to influence the majority of Americans (63%) who are not fans of science-fiction. Your interview of Gabe Stengel, Founder and CEO of Rogo is a good start towards that goal.

F1News's profile picture
F1News6 days ago

This is going to be a TREMENDOUS source of Alpha: 1) the obvious part is the AI insights they’ll be able to generate. 2) the non-obvious (and probably more important) part is going to be the massive reduction of gossiping and backstabbing the siphons off productivity.

Big Chungus's profile picture
Big Chungus6 days ago

Pretty brutal optics here: “Hey enterprise client A, just so you know everything we ever talk about and do is accessible to EVERYONE at the company, when we go sell to your competitor enterprise client B, we will be taking our learnings and serving them a carbon copy”

Tech Alex's profile picture
Tech Alex6 days ago

I'd let Shrek record me if it meant never losing ugly context: Slack, half-formed calls, and the reason we rejected a client.

00K's profile picture
00K6 days ago

recording chats might change how teams communicate

Mehdi Djabri's profile picture
Mehdi Djabri6 days ago

Try to put Shrek on 🔥

Dragonbyte🐉🦁🍀's profile picture
Dragonbyte🐉🦁🍀6 days ago

The value is not the archive; it is the retrieval of why a decision happened. Pair that memory with clear access rules and a way to correct the record, or the company brain becomes a company rumor mill.

Related Videos

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,652,308 views • 2 years ago

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 views • 7 months ago

There is a major concern about Data Centers that are using closed loop cooling systems that’s not being talked about There are a lot of chemicals being put into the water used in these systems. That water has to be flushed out every couple years Whistleblowers say that chemical water is being pushed into our streams and waterways and may have extremely limited cleaning requirements depending on state “I'm getting whistleblowers on the inside saying that they're taking all that waste and they're just running it down into the sewers. They're wanting to go to more closed cooling systems, and in those closed cooling systems, you still are gonna be using chemicals. There's no regulations about every 2 years when you have to clean out a cooling closed system, where are you gonna throw all of those chemicals?” “Taking polluted water and running it through system and dumping it into a river and it flows downstream, that will have a natural dilution, would resolve the issue, and it's not. Even if it's a closed cooling system, that water that's recycling in there, eventually they have to clean those systems. They have to release that water. And are there any regulations to look at what chemicals aren't in that water before we release it into the environment and just create another pollution issue?” “Right now it's a free-for-all out there.” It’s not a complete free for all, it depends on the states and general federal regulations. Discharges from cleaning, blowdown or maintenance are subject to environmental rules There should be compliance reporting but whistleblowers are saying none of this is being followed, they’re saying it’s a “free for all” and the data centers are just planning on the chemicals being diluted as they flow down our waterways We need investigations

Wall Street Apes

69,889 views • 2 months ago