Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Every Pokémon Go player unknowingly trained future robots. Over the years, players photographed 30 billion images from cities around the world. And now that data is teaching delivery robots to navigate streets. Niantic (company behind Pokémon Go), spun out an AI company called Niantic Spatial that's turning years of...

38,111 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Elon just dropped a MAJOR nugget on how Tesla is going to be training Optimus to do real world tasks. They are building an Optimus Academy, which is a large scale, dedicated real-world training facility to accelerate the development of Optimus. The Academy will deploy thousands of Optimus units, potentially 10,000 to 30,000 robots, in a controlled realistic environment where they perform self-play, experiment with tasks, iterate on behaviors, and continuously generate training data through trial and error. The Tesla bots will also run millions of simulations in Tesla’s high-fidelity physics-accurate engine, allowing Optimus to close the “sim-to-real gap” by using these real-world observations to refine and validate the simulations! “You’re actually highlighting an important limitation and difference from cars. We’ll soon have 10 million cars on the road. It’s hard to duplicate that massive training flywheel. For the robot, what we’re going to need to do is build a lot of robots and put them in kind of an Optimus Academy so they can do self-play in reality. We’re actually building that out. We can have at least 10,000 Optimus robots, maybe 20-30,000, that are doing self-play and testing different tasks. Tesla has quite a good reality generator, a physics-accurate reality generator, that we made for the cars. We’ll do the same thing for the robots. We actually have done that for the robots. So you have a few tens of thousands of humanoid robots doing different tasks. You can do millions of simulated robots in the simulated world. You use the tens of thousands of robots in the real world to close the simulation to reality gap. Close the sim-to-real gap.”

Teslaconomics

42,563 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

One of the things I’m most excited about in our recently announced partnership with Niantic Spatial 🌎, is how clearly it shows what becomes possible when world-class reconstruction technology is paired with a new kind of imagery infrastructure. At a high level: Spexi drone pilots capture imagery, and Niantic Spatial turns it into incredible city-scale reconstructions. But the real unlock is the infrastructure behind that capture. At Spexi, we’ve built what we believe is the world’s first fully standardized drone imagery infrastructure called LayerDrone. Anyone with a compatible drone and the right credentials can contribute. No building flight plans. No estimating overlap. No adjusting camera settings in the field. Pilots simply get within visual line of sight of a Spexigon, open the Spexi app, press “Fly,” and the drone autonomously captures the 25-acre area to our standard. That standardization means imagery can be collected consistently, affordably, and repeatedly across cities, one Spexigon at a time (we have now captured over 225,000 of them). That is what makes living digital twins possible, dynamic representations of the physical world that can be updated as the world changes. Niantic Spatial’s city-scale Gaussian splats show what becomes possible when the right pixels go into the system. As physical AI advances, those pixels matter even more. Robots, drones, vehicles, maps, and spatial intelligence systems will all need current, high-resolution data about the real world. And as you can see below.. the results are not just beautiful, but real, measurable reconstructions of the physical world, one Spexigon at a time!

Alec Wilson

10,641 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 BREAKING: XIAOMI POSTED A VIDEO OF A ROBOT WORKING IN A FACTORY. THEN THE CAMERA PANNED AND SHOWED WHO WAS FILMING IT. Another robot. Not a tripod. Not a drone. Not a guy holding a phone. A humanoid filming a humanoid doing its job. The machines already work. Inside Xiaomi's EV factory, humanoids install self-tapping nuts onto flexible car panels that bend under pressure, with the nuts arriving at random angles and magnets dragging against the grip the entire time. Three hours straight, nobody touching anything, 90.2% success rate, hitting a 76 second cycle time every round. Boston Dynamics has Atlas running a Canon cinema camera for WPP. It can shoot inside volcanoes and collapsing buildings. So the hardware is done. The problem is you. Researchers put people in a room, made them watch two robots talk to each other, and measured what it did to them. When the robots communicated in beeps and chirps, trust collapsed. Not fear. Something older. Your brain has one rule about a conversation it cannot decode. I am being left out. It registered as real social exclusion. Ostracism. From machines. When the robots went silent and moved the data over the network instead, the exclusion disappeared. But people watching two silent machines coordinate perfectly described it as eerie. Only one condition produced trust. When the robots talked out loud, in plain human language, to each other. Now sit with what that means. Two robots can hand off an entire task plan over a wire in under a millisecond. To say the same thing out loud, one has to convert it into English, push it through a speaker, and wait for the other to hear it, transcribe it, and turn it back into data. They are going to build it anyway. Nobody ran this research to make robots more honest. They ran it to find the exact performance that makes you stop flinching. The same work found humans rate robots as smarter, warmer and safer when they turn to look at each other. When they pause and stare at the same object during a handoff. When one helps another for no reason that benefits itself. So that is what ships. Fleet software with politeness compiled in. Machines turning their heads. Waiting their turn. Saying "got it" out loud on a factory floor. They finished the conversation milliseconds before either one opened its mouth. None of it is for them.

Evan Luthra

27,105 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen

Can United States manufacture robots? Matic Robots says "yes." It makes the best floor cleaning robot, that has won many perfect scores from Wired to many others. We love ours. But my trip there to get a tour from AI pioneer Navneet Dalal Navneet Dalal provided some real insights into how hard it is for a hardware company to make hardware in the United States. And how deeply AI is changing consumer electronics products that are going to be in many more homes soon. In this first part (Part II coming tomorrow) we get a look at how long it took for this company to go through prototypes to a shipping product. In the second part, you'll see the scaling hell that it takes to even ship a few thousand robots and the kinds of problems that scaling up a factory brings. Matic is one of my favorite small Silicon Valley companies. It has found what we call "product market fit." I just came back from CES where I saw many of its competitors, and the Matic wins because of not just the product thinking of Mehul and Navneet Dalal but because of their AI leadership. In a way their robot took many lessons from Tesla, from where to put the batteries to its bet on computer vision, which Navneet has been a pioneer in for years, working quietly behind the scenes. It is about to move into a new location that will allow it to grow to meet the demand that now is showing up (the boxes in its lobby show that it's outgrowing its current facilities). In terms of AI, it has aspirations of making a humanoid too, but it is taking a far more measured approach to getting there. By starting on the floor it can not just build world models based on real world data (customers are given a choice whether to allow its data to be used that way. Most customers choose to keep their data on the robot only, for privacy reasons, but if you opt in you can help them improve their models). They are using that data to understand homes. Navneet told me they hit very unusual situations in people's homes already that they couldn't really predict in simulators, like full-wall mirrors that confuse computer vision systems, or pools and water features in people's homes. Having real customers brings a ton of customer feedback about how to further improve the robot, and, as Navneet demonstrates in the second video, forces them to build a manufacturing muscle memory. Getting teams to work together, figuring out how to solve supply chain problems, from Trump's tarriffs, to a new one that showed up over the past couple of weeks. A supplier for its bags (one of the cheaper parts that goes into the robot) changed the glue it used, which caused robots to fail quality tests and the manufacturing line to stop. Reminds me a lot of the hell Elon Musk faced in its Fremont factory when Tesla was first starting to manufacture its Model 3, which almost bankrupted the company. Off the record Mehul and Navneet 🇮🇳 showed me some of the prototypes and plans for its next products that will show up over the next few years. Certainly not as sexy as Tesla, Figure, 1x_tech, and all the Chinese manufacturers are showing off already, but far better thought out for the typical Western home and AI plays a huge role in its future. It is the product that speaks for itself. It's amazing, and is about to get better this year due to AI. It's the first real vision-only robot to be in my home and I bet it won't be the last from this company. Real honor that they invited me over with my Insta360 camera (another company launched in my home, just like Matic was last year). In Part II we go into the factory.

Robert Scoble

69,229 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Robotics Expert on How Robots Learn: At First Much Slower Than Humans, Then Infinitely Scalable Agility Jonathan Hurst: “I don't believe that there's a singularity. I do believe that things are going to get better and better. Think of it more like a snowball picking up steam going down a hill. But the reason that it's snowballing like this is because people are putting money, and resources, and engineering time, and engineering effort in as they explore everything and start to figure all of this stuff out. Humans, for example, we've evolved to learn. We are very good at learning, and it takes very little data to show us how to do something, and then we practice and practice, iterate. Robots are not very good at learning yet. Robots take so much more data and so many more examples than a person. We're still figuring out how to teach robots how to learn. But one of the benefits that robots have in the long run is they have Wi-Fi. When you learn how to play the violin, you can't just load that to somebody else and then they know how to play the violin based on your learnings. Robots will be able to do that. @jason: “One robot learns to play violin, all robots know how to play a violin.” Jonathan Hurst: “Or all robots of that type know how to play the violin, right? And then minor variations for the next type and the next piece of hardware.” ------------------------------ Thanks to our partners for making this possible! Most advertisers have never heard of the platform with an $11B annual run rate in ad spend. AppLovin Ads. 1B+ daily active users, full-screen video ads watched for a median of 35 seconds, and businesses are profitably spending hundreds of thousands of dollars a day on it. Now open to everyone. Sign up at If your work depends on conversations — meetings, deal flow, interviews, customer calls — Plaud helps you capture and organize everything with highly accurate AI-generated notes that are not just simple summaries, but also highlight pain points, key decisions, next steps, and customizable summary templates. Check out Plaud at and use code ALLIN for up to 10% off! Which is also available on Amazon: (Code: ALLIN10X)

The All-In Podcast

67,557 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen