正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

“Every single NIH employee had to write… a loyalty oath to DEI principles.” Dr. Jay Bhattacharya reveals that the woke ideology infected science over the past 20 years. “None of it actually translated over to better health for anybody.” It’s worse than we think. “Over the last 15-20 years,...

219,167 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya just pledged to support dissident scientists in his Senate confirmation hearing: “Dissent is the very essence of science.” “23% of Americans have not much or no confidence at all … in scientists to act in the public’s best interests.” “I have five concrete goals if confirmed as Director of the NIH.” “First, NIH research should focus on research that solves the American chronic disease crisis.” “Life expectancy flatlined between 2012 and 2019, plummeted during the pandemic, and still has not bounced back.” “The chronic disease crisis is severe, with hundreds of millions of Americans—children and adults—suffering from obesity, heart disease, cancer and more.” “Second, NIH-supported science should be replicable, reproducible, and generalizable.” “Unfortunately, much bought modern biomedical science fails this basic test.” “Third, if confirmed, I will establish a culture of respect for free speech in science and scientific dissent at the NIH.” “Over the last few years, top NIH officials oversaw a culture of cover-up, obfuscation, and a lack of tolerance for ideas that differ from theirs.” “Fourth, the NIH must recommit to its mission to fund the most innovative biomedical research agenda possible to improve American health.” “Fifth, the NIH must embrace, and vigorously regulate, risky research that has the possibility of causing a pandemic.” “If confirmed, I'll carry out President Trump's agenda of making the public science institutions of this country worthy of trust and serve to Make America Healthy Again.” Jay Bhattacharya

Holden Culotta

203,693 次观看 • 1 年前

“Almost every single top Chinese biomedical research scientist of note was funded in some part by the NIH. Many were trained in the United States,” NIH director Jay Bhattacharya told me during our recent interview. He says the NIH is now overhauling how it handles foreign research collaborations. The old “sub-award” system—where U.S. institutions funneled money to foreign labs—led to major oversight problems, Bhattacharya says. Under that structure, the U.S. partner was responsible for auditing the foreign collaborator, not the NIH itself. “In the case of Wuhan…EcoHealth Alliance had a sub-award relationship with this Wuhan Institute of Virology, and when all of the pandemic happened…EcoHealth Alliance essentially delayed reporting…and then ultimately said: ‘Oh, well, we don't control Wuhan Institute of Virology. We can't get the lab notebooks.’ That is an unacceptable structure.” “If American taxpayer dollars are going to go to some foreign institution, then we should be confident that we, the Americans, have an auditing relationship that allows us to get access to the kinds of things that we normally have access to for a domestic institution that we fund,” he says. As one of his first decisions as NIH Director, Bhattacharya created a new system that gives the NIH direct oversight of both U.S. and foreign collaborators. This change means the agency can cut off funding if a partner refuses to cooperate. He also introduced two new requirements for any foreign collaboration: – Researchers must show the project would be much more expensive to run in the U.S. – They must show the knowledge gained will directly benefit Americans. Jay Bhattacharya, MD, PhD NIH

Jan Jekielek

12,738 次观看 • 6 个月前