Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

"every single trader out there seems to make the same mistake over and over again. their position size is probably two to ten times more than it should be." martin shkreli built a kelly criterion simulator to test exactly this. "most folks don't actually have an edge when they... trade. but if they did, they're trading as if they had a 4x or 5x kelly edge." "if you run the simulator, you will go to zero each time." "even with a 60/40 edge on every trade you make, you'll go bust if you overbet." "and who has a 60/40 edge in the stock market? nobody has a 60/40 edge." even a real edge, sized wrong, still ends at zero. sizing is too commonly the part I see every trader consider second or third.show more

Goshawk Trades

75,528 subscribers

337,431 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Bildung Finanzen Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The best signal is sometimes NO signal. That is why I do not trade when Intelligent Balance shows less than 60%. Below 60% means one thing to me: NO CLEAR EDGE. And that is exactly where most traders destroy their account. They see a sweep. They see an iFVG. They see CISD. They convince themselves there is a trade. But without a strong more probable side, the setup has no real filter. For me: 60%+ = I have a side to focus on. Below 60% = I protect capital. Simple. Intelligent Balance is not only there to tell me where to trade. It is there to tell me when NOT to trade. Because forcing trades in a low-edge environment is not trading. It is gambling with extra steps. Would you skip a session if the indicator told you there is no clear edge?

The best signal is sometimes NO signal. That is why I do not trade when Intelligent Balance shows less than 60%. Below 60% means one thing to me: NO CLEAR EDGE. And that is exactly where most traders destroy their account. They see a sweep. They see an iFVG. They see CISD. They convince themselves there is a trade. But without a strong more probable side, the setup has no real filter. For me: 60%+ = I have a side to focus on. Below 60% = I protect capital. Simple. Intelligent Balance is not only there to tell me where to trade. It is there to tell me when NOT to trade. Because forcing trades in a low-edge environment is not trading. It is gambling with extra steps. Would you skip a session if the indicator told you there is no clear edge?

Herman Trading

18,993 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Qullamaggie on Lose Little or Breakeven Until the Next Bull Run “Right now the market is screaming at our faces don’t buy stocks. And if you’re gonna buy them, you gotta be super selective. And even then you’re probably gonna get slammed most of the time. And this is where the edge is, this is how you trade with an edge. The bull market geniuses are probably frantically trying to find new stocks to buy on or holding the high flyers they bought recently that are now down fifty seventy percent from highs. They’re trading with no edge. If you, or if you stay in the game during these periods, if you can stay break even or lose only very little, or maybe even make money if you’re also short, you know wait for the next bull run, you’re gonna have an intact account, you’re gonna have an intact psyche, and next bull run you’re gonna double triple quadruple your money again in a short amount of time. Rinse and repeat that’s what trading is all about, identifying these cycles.”

Qullamaggie on Lose Little or Breakeven Until the Next Bull Run “Right now the market is screaming at our faces don’t buy stocks. And if you’re gonna buy them, you gotta be super selective. And even then you’re probably gonna get slammed most of the time. And this is where the edge is, this is how you trade with an edge. The bull market geniuses are probably frantically trying to find new stocks to buy on or holding the high flyers they bought recently that are now down fifty seventy percent from highs. They’re trading with no edge. If you, or if you stay in the game during these periods, if you can stay break even or lose only very little, or maybe even make money if you’re also short, you know wait for the next bull run, you’re gonna have an intact account, you’re gonna have an intact psyche, and next bull run you’re gonna double triple quadruple your money again in a short amount of time. Rinse and repeat that’s what trading is all about, identifying these cycles.”

Lone

24,055 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

2k to 93,200. Another day. Another step closer to 100k. Let me be very clear so nobody confuses this with luck. Accounts do not grow like this by accident. They grow when you stop gambling and start operating with rules. Every trade I take has a reason. Every entry has invalidation. Every loss is accepted before the trade is placed. This is where most people fail. They say they want growth but they trade emotionally. They size too big. They chase moves they missed. They let losers run because admitting they are wrong hurts their ego. The market punishes ego fast. The goal is not to be right. The goal is to be disciplined. I do not need to catch every move. I only need to catch the ones that fit my plan. Flat days are wins. Small green days are wins. Survival is a win. You cannot compound if you are constantly digging out of drawdowns. As the account grows the rules get tighter, not looser. Risk scales slower than confidence. Profits are protected. Trades are fewer but cleaner. This is how you go from small money to real money without blowing up. If you are trying to do this yourself understand something important. The edge is not a secret indicator. The edge is patience. The edge is saying no to bad setups. The edge is showing up every day with the same process whether you are up or down. 93,200 is not the finish line. It is proof of concept. 100k is close. The work stays the same. If you are serious about trading stop looking for shortcuts. Build rules. Respect risk. Let discipline compound.

2k to 93,200. Another day. Another step closer to 100k. Let me be very clear so nobody confuses this with luck. Accounts do not grow like this by accident. They grow when you stop gambling and start operating with rules. Every trade I take has a reason. Every entry has invalidation. Every loss is accepted before the trade is placed. This is where most people fail. They say they want growth but they trade emotionally. They size too big. They chase moves they missed. They let losers run because admitting they are wrong hurts their ego. The market punishes ego fast. The goal is not to be right. The goal is to be disciplined. I do not need to catch every move. I only need to catch the ones that fit my plan. Flat days are wins. Small green days are wins. Survival is a win. You cannot compound if you are constantly digging out of drawdowns. As the account grows the rules get tighter, not looser. Risk scales slower than confidence. Profits are protected. Trades are fewer but cleaner. This is how you go from small money to real money without blowing up. If you are trying to do this yourself understand something important. The edge is not a secret indicator. The edge is patience. The edge is saying no to bad setups. The edge is showing up every day with the same process whether you are up or down. 93,200 is not the finish line. It is proof of concept. 100k is close. The work stays the same. If you are serious about trading stop looking for shortcuts. Build rules. Respect risk. Let discipline compound.

CooperBaggs 💰🍞

27,566 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Qullamaggie on How to Make 870% Returns In One Year “As a trader, if you wanna, if you want to make 800 per 870% return in one year, you can do it. There are two main ways to do it, okay? One is to go all in on your favorite stock or someone else’s favorite stock; the other is to use options with call options and hope the trade works out. Or, if you have an exploitable edge or several exploitable edges, you can aggressively exploit those edges. Those are the two ways of making returns like that. The problem is if you are in category 1, where you go all in one stock, on margin or options, you may be really lucky, right? You catch something big, the problem is you’re probably not gonna repeat it the next year or the year after or the year after that. While if you have an exploitable edge, you will exploit, you know. You can repeat it year after year after year until infinity. There is no upper limit; it all depends on you.”

Qullamaggie on How to Make 870% Returns In One Year “As a trader, if you wanna, if you want to make 800 per 870% return in one year, you can do it. There are two main ways to do it, okay? One is to go all in on your favorite stock or someone else’s favorite stock; the other is to use options with call options and hope the trade works out. Or, if you have an exploitable edge or several exploitable edges, you can aggressively exploit those edges. Those are the two ways of making returns like that. The problem is if you are in category 1, where you go all in one stock, on margin or options, you may be really lucky, right? You catch something big, the problem is you’re probably not gonna repeat it the next year or the year after or the year after that. While if you have an exploitable edge, you will exploit, you know. You can repeat it year after year after year until infinity. There is no upper limit; it all depends on you.”

Lone

75,591 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Most traders know that you can't predict the markets, but they trade as if they can. This has to be the most common and costly trading mistake of all. Goes to show the difference between knowing and doing. Sandeep Rao - SEBI Reg. RA🖖 recently recorded a podcast with the great Tom Sosnoff, co-founder of Thinkorswim and tastytrade, on our new YouTube channel, and here's what Tom said: "It takes a long time to convince yourself to learn certain things—mostly because we all have big egos and our own ideas. It took me a really long time to realize that I don’t actually know what’s going to happen next. I used to think I had an edge because I’ve spent four and a half decades watching markets. I’d tell myself, “Nobody has watched more ticks in the S&P than I have over the last 40 years, so that should give me an edge.” But it doesn’t. And it took me a long time to appreciate that I don’t have any real edge over anyone else when it comes to predicting what happens next. I do have some comfort in having seen just about everything once or twice, but that’s not an edge." Tom has been trading for decades, and there are so many takeaways in the conversation. Check out the link to the video in the comments.

Most traders know that you can't predict the markets, but they trade as if they can. This has to be the most common and costly trading mistake of all. Goes to show the difference between knowing and doing. Sandeep Rao - SEBI Reg. RA🖖 recently recorded a podcast with the great Tom Sosnoff, co-founder of Thinkorswim and tastytrade, on our new YouTube channel, and here's what Tom said: "It takes a long time to convince yourself to learn certain things—mostly because we all have big egos and our own ideas. It took me a really long time to realize that I don’t actually know what’s going to happen next. I used to think I had an edge because I’ve spent four and a half decades watching markets. I’d tell myself, “Nobody has watched more ticks in the S&P than I have over the last 40 years, so that should give me an edge.” But it doesn’t. And it took me a long time to appreciate that I don’t have any real edge over anyone else when it comes to predicting what happens next. I do have some comfort in having seen just about everything once or twice, but that’s not an edge." Tom has been trading for decades, and there are so many takeaways in the conversation. Check out the link to the video in the comments.

Nithin Kamath

86,450 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

No Significant Edge Everyone with the same tools, same rivers dredged Now it's a precipice, we're all on a ledge If you don't go viral then you're not full fledged Because no-one's actually having fun Looking for that soft drink commercial so they can be done Not willing to tread water with a couple of puns No Years of the small leagues, a couple of months and they're done No Significant Edge But your clients are sticky glue, they're actually a curse No weight for the experiment no room to research You're kidding yourself if you think a billionaire cares They didn't get to where they are by playing fair No Significant Edge If you can weather the storm then you're the undead I'm like a zombie with beats for brains If you look really close you'll see the paint stains No Significant Edge When it's gone I'm still on I still float a pattern, song If it's wrong I go long I don't care for happen stance No Significant Edge Your Arts a weapon it's not a way to trim a hedge You can ride the wave and you're just the froth Be the ocean the water then there's nothing to top Times your friend if you enjoy the walk Else it's all filler all just talk No Significant Edge

No Significant Edge Everyone with the same tools, same rivers dredged Now it's a precipice, we're all on a ledge If you don't go viral then you're not full fledged Because no-one's actually having fun Looking for that soft drink commercial so they can be done Not willing to tread water with a couple of puns No Years of the small leagues, a couple of months and they're done No Significant Edge But your clients are sticky glue, they're actually a curse No weight for the experiment no room to research You're kidding yourself if you think a billionaire cares They didn't get to where they are by playing fair No Significant Edge If you can weather the storm then you're the undead I'm like a zombie with beats for brains If you look really close you'll see the paint stains No Significant Edge When it's gone I'm still on I still float a pattern, song If it's wrong I go long I don't care for happen stance No Significant Edge Your Arts a weapon it's not a way to trim a hedge You can ride the wave and you're just the froth Be the ocean the water then there's nothing to top Times your friend if you enjoy the walk Else it's all filler all just talk No Significant Edge

Trisha Code

47,592 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Equity Edge has reached $13,000,000 in payouts 🌍 Another milestone. But more importantly, another reminder of what Equity Edge was built for. $13 million paid out to traders who kept showing up, stuck to their routine, managed their risk and stayed disciplined when it mattered. Behind every payout is a trader who put in the work. We’re proud of what we’ve built with Equity Edge, but even prouder of the community that continues to grow with us. To every trader who’s been part of the journey so far, thank you. Now we want to hear from you… 👇 What payout milestone are YOU working towards next?

Equity Edge has reached $13,000,000 in payouts 🌍 Another milestone. But more importantly, another reminder of what Equity Edge was built for. $13 million paid out to traders who kept showing up, stuck to their routine, managed their risk and stayed disciplined when it mattered. Behind every payout is a trader who put in the work. We’re proud of what we’ve built with Equity Edge, but even prouder of the community that continues to grow with us. To every trader who’s been part of the journey so far, thank you. Now we want to hear from you… 👇 What payout milestone are YOU working towards next?

Equity Edge

15,695 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

"If you eliminate all the teams that I want to beat their ass, you wouldn't have anybody to trade with” ⭐️ Cowboys Owner Jerry Jones no regrets on trade with the Eagles in 1st round of NFL Draft “Philadelphia has an edge… but I got a bigger grin out of it than they did”

"If you eliminate all the teams that I want to beat their ass, you wouldn't have anybody to trade with” ⭐️ Cowboys Owner Jerry Jones no regrets on trade with the Eagles in 1st round of NFL Draft “Philadelphia has an edge… but I got a bigger grin out of it than they did”

Jeff Skversky

102,576 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Professional trader and former prop firm performance coach, Imre, breaks one of the biggest myths in trading: “Most people think edge is discipline… Or mindset… Or some secret setup.” But what if that’s completely wrong? Because if your “edge” disappears the moment conditions change… Was it ever an edge to begin with? The truth is uncomfortable: Edge isn’t what you see on the charts. It’s what’s forcing other participants to act. Rebalancing flows, Gamma exposure, Stops getting cleared; That’s where moves actually come from. And if you’re not trading the cause… You’re just reacting to the effect. So here’s the real question: Are you trading patterns… Or do you understand what’s forcing the market to move? Full Episode 👇

Professional trader and former prop firm performance coach, Imre, breaks one of the biggest myths in trading: “Most people think edge is discipline… Or mindset… Or some secret setup.” But what if that’s completely wrong? Because if your “edge” disappears the moment conditions change… Was it ever an edge to begin with? The truth is uncomfortable: Edge isn’t what you see on the charts. It’s what’s forcing other participants to act. Rebalancing flows, Gamma exposure, Stops getting cleared; That’s where moves actually come from. And if you’re not trading the cause… You’re just reacting to the effect. So here’s the real question: Are you trading patterns… Or do you understand what’s forcing the market to move? Full Episode 👇

Riz Iqbal

38,690 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Why You Need Patience in Trading “If you day trade, you will find trades pretty much every day. There is no bad or there is no good or bad market in that way. Like you can pretty much trade almost every day as long as you get set up. But swing trading is different because swing trading just doesn't work all the time, at least on the long side. You have to be inactive for long periods of time, sometimes for months. While if you're a day trader, you can be more active. Like there is not necessarily periods where you have to be more inactive to the same extent as in swing and position trading. You gotta have a lot of patience. That's also why it's better to have a larger account if you start swing trading because you don't have to worry about the money as much. Like, oh, I have bills to pay, I need to trade, I need to make money. So it's better to have a larger account because you don't give a sh*t. So what if I don't make money this month? It doesn't matter because maybe next month I'll make a million, right? So it doesn't really matter if I don't make money this month. It’s very psychological, too. Very, very psychological, this game.”

Qullamaggie on Why You Need Patience in Trading “If you day trade, you will find trades pretty much every day. There is no bad or there is no good or bad market in that way. Like you can pretty much trade almost every day as long as you get set up. But swing trading is different because swing trading just doesn't work all the time, at least on the long side. You have to be inactive for long periods of time, sometimes for months. While if you're a day trader, you can be more active. Like there is not necessarily periods where you have to be more inactive to the same extent as in swing and position trading. You gotta have a lot of patience. That's also why it's better to have a larger account if you start swing trading because you don't have to worry about the money as much. Like, oh, I have bills to pay, I need to trade, I need to make money. So it's better to have a larger account because you don't give a sh*t. So what if I don't make money this month? It doesn't matter because maybe next month I'll make a million, right? So it doesn't really matter if I don't make money this month. It’s very psychological, too. Very, very psychological, this game.”

Lone

14,618 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

THIS KNOWLEDGE MUST BE FORBIDDEN an ex-Jane Street guy told me your "edge" has an expiration date and you don't know it "retail finds a strategy. we find the retail finding it. then we eat it" every pattern you learn on YouTube was profitable until it wasn't the moment 10,000 people trade the same breakout, the desk models it and inverts it > a strategy goes from +edge to -edge in ~6 to 9 months once it hits retail > by the time a guru sells you the course, the desk has already priced your entry as their exit > he said 80% of "profitable strategies" shared publicly are dead or inverted within a year > the course isn't teaching you to win. it's herding you into the trade they're about to take against you he said the real edge isn't a pattern it's being early and leaving before the crowd arrives you bought the strategy at the top of its lifecycle. they sold it to you there on purpose the guru isn't smarter than you. he's just standing where the liquidity collects you're not late to the strategy. you're the liquidity the strategy was built to collect bookmark this before you buy another $997 course they don't sell you an edge. they sell you to the e

THIS KNOWLEDGE MUST BE FORBIDDEN an ex-Jane Street guy told me your "edge" has an expiration date and you don't know it "retail finds a strategy. we find the retail finding it. then we eat it" every pattern you learn on YouTube was profitable until it wasn't the moment 10,000 people trade the same breakout, the desk models it and inverts it > a strategy goes from +edge to -edge in ~6 to 9 months once it hits retail > by the time a guru sells you the course, the desk has already priced your entry as their exit > he said 80% of "profitable strategies" shared publicly are dead or inverted within a year > the course isn't teaching you to win. it's herding you into the trade they're about to take against you he said the real edge isn't a pattern it's being early and leaving before the crowd arrives you bought the strategy at the top of its lifecycle. they sold it to you there on purpose the guru isn't smarter than you. he's just standing where the liquidity collects you're not late to the strategy. you're the liquidity the strategy was built to collect bookmark this before you buy another $997 course they don't sell you an edge. they sell you to the e

Livsun

11,244 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger were asked about Jim Simons' Medallion fund, ~39% a year, net of fees, for three decades, and whether Berkshire would ever hire a quant to trade like that. Their answer is a masterclass: "we're not trying to make money trading stocks. we don't think we know how to do it. if we knew how, we'd probably be trading stocks too. but we don't, and we really don't trust anybody else to do it for us." two of the greatest investors, plainly saying: that's not our edge, so we don't play there. then Munger explained why even Renaissance had a ceiling: "if they tried to do it too much, they destroyed their own advantage. there was a limit on the amount they could make." the better the edge, the smaller it often is. the most inefficient, hardest-to-find opportunities pay the most per dollar, which is exactly why most edges of those kinda can't scale that aggressively. capacity and edge trade off against each other. none of which takes away from what Simons built. it just explains why it didn't scale to manage $1 trillion.

Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger were asked about Jim Simons' Medallion fund, ~39% a year, net of fees, for three decades, and whether Berkshire would ever hire a quant to trade like that. Their answer is a masterclass: "we're not trying to make money trading stocks. we don't think we know how to do it. if we knew how, we'd probably be trading stocks too. but we don't, and we really don't trust anybody else to do it for us." two of the greatest investors, plainly saying: that's not our edge, so we don't play there. then Munger explained why even Renaissance had a ceiling: "if they tried to do it too much, they destroyed their own advantage. there was a limit on the amount they could make." the better the edge, the smaller it often is. the most inefficient, hardest-to-find opportunities pay the most per dollar, which is exactly why most edges of those kinda can't scale that aggressively. capacity and edge trade off against each other. none of which takes away from what Simons built. it just explains why it didn't scale to manage $1 trillion.

Goshawk Trades

81,896 Aufrufe • vor 25 Tagen

i build a polymarket trading bot. took an old abandoned repo, rewrote 90% of it. name: zostaff repo: mit. python 3.12+. py-clob-client with eip-712 signed orders. usdc.e on polygon. three strategies in the box: AI Directional (llm via openrouter, any model), Safe Compounder (pure edge math, no llm), Beast Mode (aggressive, kept for comparison). most "ai bots" for polymarket on github are abandoned templates with hardcoded losing strategies. this one ships with a streamlit dashboard, sqlite telemetry on every trade, fallback chain across llm models, circuit breaker at 15% drawdown, quarter-kelly default, paper trading mode by default - until you flip LIVE_TRADING_ENABLED=true, nothing goes live. the readme has a section called "Lessons From Live Trading". real numbers from real losses: three-quarter kelly destroys capital on a 45% win-rate strategy. category discipline beats ai confidence every single time. a 50% drawdown limit isn't a limit. more trades without edge = faster path to zero. this is not a turnkey bot. nobody on polymarket is selling a turnkey bot that works. it's a toolkit with three example strategies you fork to fit your own edge. if you don't have an edge - no llm will save you. if you do - run paper mode for a week before flipping live.

i build a polymarket trading bot. took an old abandoned repo, rewrote 90% of it. name: zostaff repo: mit. python 3.12+. py-clob-client with eip-712 signed orders. usdc.e on polygon. three strategies in the box: AI Directional (llm via openrouter, any model), Safe Compounder (pure edge math, no llm), Beast Mode (aggressive, kept for comparison). most "ai bots" for polymarket on github are abandoned templates with hardcoded losing strategies. this one ships with a streamlit dashboard, sqlite telemetry on every trade, fallback chain across llm models, circuit breaker at 15% drawdown, quarter-kelly default, paper trading mode by default - until you flip LIVE_TRADING_ENABLED=true, nothing goes live. the readme has a section called "Lessons From Live Trading". real numbers from real losses: three-quarter kelly destroys capital on a 45% win-rate strategy. category discipline beats ai confidence every single time. a 50% drawdown limit isn't a limit. more trades without edge = faster path to zero. this is not a turnkey bot. nobody on polymarket is selling a turnkey bot that works. it's a toolkit with three example strategies you fork to fit your own edge. if you don't have an edge - no llm will save you. if you do - run paper mode for a week before flipping live.

zostaff

28,174 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Putting in Work on the Weekends Is the Only Way You Will Make It In Trading “Don't forget to put in a lot of work during the weekend. That's the only way you're going to make it. It's during the weekends. That's where your edge is honed. It's not watching trading choppy markets. That's not where you get an edge. You get an edge by sitting there and doing things most people are not willing to do. That's where edge comes from. Okay, guys. Good luck. See ya.”

Qullamaggie on Putting in Work on the Weekends Is the Only Way You Will Make It In Trading “Don't forget to put in a lot of work during the weekend. That's the only way you're going to make it. It's during the weekends. That's where your edge is honed. It's not watching trading choppy markets. That's not where you get an edge. You get an edge by sitting there and doing things most people are not willing to do. That's where edge comes from. Okay, guys. Good luck. See ya.”

Lone

15,114 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Charlie Munger: "It's not a competency if you don't know the edge of it. You are a disaster if you don't know the edge of your own competency." "Warren [Buffett] frequently says, 'I'd rather deal with a guy with an IQ of 130 who thinks it's 125 than a guy with an IQ of 180 who thinks it's 200. That second guy will kill you.'" "Warren and I know the edge of our competency better than other people do. That is a very important thing to know." (Caltech || 2008)

Charlie Munger: "It's not a competency if you don't know the edge of it. You are a disaster if you don't know the edge of your own competency." "Warren [Buffett] frequently says, 'I'd rather deal with a guy with an IQ of 130 who thinks it's 125 than a guy with an IQ of 180 who thinks it's 200. That second guy will kill you.'" "Warren and I know the edge of our competency better than other people do. That is a very important thing to know." (Caltech || 2008)

Kevin Carpenter

16,530 Aufrufe • vor 17 Tagen

Qullamaggie on Minimum Account Size to Make A Living Off Trading vs. Trading While Working “What do you recommend as a minimum workable account size for your swing strategy? If you want to make a living, probably 500k at least. Or 300k. If you’re only gonna swing trade. But if you work full or part time, and trade part time, and you don’t need to take out money from your trading accounts, you could do it with 10k. If you double your 10k every year, after taxes, you’ll have 20k the next year and 40k the year after, 80k 160k 320k. Even with a small 10k account you’re gonna have millions after 6, 7 years. Once you get profitable. Assuming you don’t put more money in it. But if you’re gonna live off of it, you probably need at least 300-500k. Because with my strategy you’re gonna go sideways - your equity gonna go sideways for months and months at a time every year. The markets we are in right now, it’s a rare market that doesn’t happen most of the time. Right now, it’s almost too easy; everything just keeps going straight up. It’s the best time for my swing trading strategy, but most of the time, it can be a struggle.”

Qullamaggie on Minimum Account Size to Make A Living Off Trading vs. Trading While Working “What do you recommend as a minimum workable account size for your swing strategy? If you want to make a living, probably 500k at least. Or 300k. If you’re only gonna swing trade. But if you work full or part time, and trade part time, and you don’t need to take out money from your trading accounts, you could do it with 10k. If you double your 10k every year, after taxes, you’ll have 20k the next year and 40k the year after, 80k 160k 320k. Even with a small 10k account you’re gonna have millions after 6, 7 years. Once you get profitable. Assuming you don’t put more money in it. But if you’re gonna live off of it, you probably need at least 300-500k. Because with my strategy you’re gonna go sideways - your equity gonna go sideways for months and months at a time every year. The markets we are in right now, it’s a rare market that doesn’t happen most of the time. Right now, it’s almost too easy; everything just keeps going straight up. It’s the best time for my swing trading strategy, but most of the time, it can be a struggle.”

Lone

31,540 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

WE DID IT! 1 month ago, we started the $100,000 challenge we went to $0, and then somehow -$4,000 the moment you think you have an edge in sports betting… yeah, we move while i was losing, a few traders were cooking: – $1M from geopolitics, selling into euphoria, not waiting for the bet to close – $57,000 from reading momentum on 15-minute bitcoin charts – and one guy literally predicting the weather after talking to the best prediction market traders, here’s what i’m taking into this next month: 1. find a real edge prediction markets alone aren’t an edge just like crypto, the edge is finding a niche and owning that information 2. find mispricings every win i’ve had, and every great trader i’ve studied, sells into euphoria you don’t need to wait for the bet to settle to make money 3. be patient you don’t need a trade every day wait for real opportunities then make your move this year, im trying to less to gamble, and want to actually try to make money if im using PMs, so ill implement these this month

WE DID IT! 1 month ago, we started the $100,000 challenge we went to $0, and then somehow -$4,000 the moment you think you have an edge in sports betting… yeah, we move while i was losing, a few traders were cooking: – $1M from geopolitics, selling into euphoria, not waiting for the bet to close – $57,000 from reading momentum on 15-minute bitcoin charts – and one guy literally predicting the weather after talking to the best prediction market traders, here’s what i’m taking into this next month: 1. find a real edge prediction markets alone aren’t an edge just like crypto, the edge is finding a niche and owning that information 2. find mispricings every win i’ve had, and every great trader i’ve studied, sells into euphoria you don’t need to wait for the bet to settle to make money 3. be patient you don’t need a trade every day wait for real opportunities then make your move this year, im trying to less to gamble, and want to actually try to make money if im using PMs, so ill implement these this month

۟

23,030 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Qullamaggie on Don’t Have Lots of Commitments When Starting to Trade “If you’re starting out trading, it’s a very hard thing, you know. Becoming a successful trader takes a lot. Most people I know who started trading and actually became successful began in their twenties or somewhere in their thirties. And most of them were single and had no kids when they started out. But once you’re profitable, it doesn’t really matter anymore because you don’t have to put in the same intense effort. Then it doesn’t matter if you have kids or a family — you can make it work anyway once you’re consistently profitable. When you’re just starting out, though, you better not have a lot of other major commitments. Because it’s probably going to be a very hard thing to do. Honestly, trying to learn trading while you already have kids and all that… oh man, I wouldn’t have become a successful trader if I had kids when I started out. No way.”

Qullamaggie on Don’t Have Lots of Commitments When Starting to Trade “If you’re starting out trading, it’s a very hard thing, you know. Becoming a successful trader takes a lot. Most people I know who started trading and actually became successful began in their twenties or somewhere in their thirties. And most of them were single and had no kids when they started out. But once you’re profitable, it doesn’t really matter anymore because you don’t have to put in the same intense effort. Then it doesn’t matter if you have kids or a family — you can make it work anyway once you’re consistently profitable. When you’re just starting out, though, you better not have a lot of other major commitments. Because it’s probably going to be a very hard thing to do. Honestly, trying to learn trading while you already have kids and all that… oh man, I wouldn’t have become a successful trader if I had kids when I started out. No way.”

Lone

13,416 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Why is there never any accountability when it comes to employers. It seems they operate teetering on the edge of ethical incompetence at times when it comes to hiring. If I make a mistake on the application then I can easily be disqualified without an explanation for a job. But how can they offer me a job and then take it away because they didn’t check my availability? Is it because they thought if they offered me enough money I would change my mind? Would that work with you? I can be flexible but I do keep a schedule for a reason.

Why is there never any accountability when it comes to employers. It seems they operate teetering on the edge of ethical incompetence at times when it comes to hiring. If I make a mistake on the application then I can easily be disqualified without an explanation for a job. But how can they offer me a job and then take it away because they didn’t check my availability? Is it because they thought if they offered me enough money I would change my mind? Would that work with you? I can be flexible but I do keep a schedule for a reason.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

470,457 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat