Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Every time I ask a question to those on the Signal chain about whether classified information was shared, I get slippery semantics. This was a reckless breach of security at the hands of our top national security officials. Responsibility needs to be taken. Period.

Senator Angus King

224,990 subscribers

112,900 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Yorum

Jennifer Erin Valent 🇺🇦🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı

Jennifer Erin Valent 🇺🇦🇺🇸1 yıl önce

Senator, I really can't express to you how much I have appreciated your firm adherence to truth and the rule of law during these Trump years. It's just such a relief to see that people of conviction and courage who put country over self-interest still exist. Thank you.

RW Chambered🇺🇲 profil fotoğrafı

RW Chambered🇺🇲1 yıl önce

Go back to your pudding. You didn't mind Milley working a side deal with the ChiComs. You didn't mind Vindman disclosing, inaccurately, the phone call Trump had with a foreign leader. You're as bad as Liz Warren

Pete ⛷ profil fotoğrafı

Pete ⛷1 yıl önce

Where was Angus' concern when the Biden cartel was selling us out to the CCP?

catlett profil fotoğrafı

catlett1 yıl önce

Sure ... but after responsibility is taken for Biden's withdrawal from Afghanistan you hypocrite. The Afghanistan blunder cost US lives. The Signal mishap did not. The execution of the plan was flawless. You people need to learn that execution and achievement is what matters.

havoc211 profil fotoğrafı

havoc2111 yıl önce

You haven't felt that way about taking responsibility for what your party has done. And you have yet to establish what factually happened. Kinda why it's a dead story.

David Matheny profil fotoğrafı

David Matheny1 yıl önce

Was "classified" material discussed in the GOP clown show's Signal security breach? It was real-time. Nothing discussed had been ruled upon by any classifying authority, so tricky answer: no. But some of those things would be classified by their very nature, so real answer: yes.

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple profil fotoğrafı

SecBriefs | Making Cybersecurity Simple1 yıl önce

😱The cybersecurity skills gap is a national security risk. Many public & private orgs struggle to defend against cyberattacks due to understaffed security teams.🚨 🧠Learn cybersecurity - get a well paid, in demand job! Start your journey here:

Matthew Skolnikoff profil fotoğrafı

Matthew Skolnikoff1 yıl önce

Please don't drop the investigation of Hesgeth and the others just because America has turned its attention to the next epic fail by the Trump administration (the economy).

Rick Chayer profil fotoğrafı

Rick Chayer1 yıl önce

Im honored to be the first here to tell you to shut the fuck up

William Bud Haugh profil fotoğrafı

William Bud Haugh1 yıl önce

Hold their feet to the fire, Senator!

Bob Sands profil fotoğrafı

Bob Sands1 yıl önce

And you would certainly know all about slippery semantics.

Benzer Videolar

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Speaking in the Security update - Officials Secrets Act Case: The 2002 and 2003 integrated reviews were very clear. All the officials and the security services called and said that China was a significant threat. That was sufficient to give to the CPS, not even by ministers but by officials. The question is: why wasn’t it? But the question I really wanted to ask today concerns this absurdity about the role, or lack of role, of the National Security Adviser. The government says he wasn’t involved in any matters of substance — but isn’t it the role of the National Security Adviser to be involved in all matters of substance when it comes to national security? So, what’s the point of a National Security Adviser who does not involve themselves in matters of national security, as in this case? Instead, we are meant to believe that the Deputy National Security Adviser is allowed, in this case, to involve themselves in substantial matters of national security, but not apparently discuss these substantial matters of national security with the National Security Adviser. This does seem to be an absolute matter of substantial absurdity.

Iain Duncan Smith MP Chingford & Woodford Green

70,473 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Signal contained no classified information. For years, Hillary Clinton shared classified national security secrets from her personal email. Forget about apples to oranges, this is like comparing apples to a steak.

Signal contained no classified information. For years, Hillary Clinton shared classified national security secrets from her personal email. Forget about apples to oranges, this is like comparing apples to a steak.

Markwayne Mullin

5,822,828 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

.DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "I want to address, briefly, the Signal chat issue... As the President and National Security Advisor stated, no classified information was shared. There were no sources, methods, locations or war plans that were shared."

.DNI Tulsi Gabbard: "I want to address, briefly, the Signal chat issue... As the President and National Security Advisor stated, no classified information was shared. There were no sources, methods, locations or war plans that were shared."

Rapid Response 47

141,647 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Department of Homeland Security was created in the aftermath of September 11th and was created to ensure a coordinated effort for protecting our homeland. The time for politics is over. This is about our national security. Everyone needs to vote in favor of funding our government and the Department of Homeland Security to ensure they have all of the resources necessary to protect the homeland.

The Department of Homeland Security was created in the aftermath of September 11th and was created to ensure a coordinated effort for protecting our homeland. The time for politics is over. This is about our national security. Everyone needs to vote in favor of funding our government and the Department of Homeland Security to ensure they have all of the resources necessary to protect the homeland.

Mike Lawler

16,402 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

In this Liberty’s Voice clip, I explain why leaks from top intelligence officials are dangerous to the presidency and U.S. national security. Drawing on my experience in the Reagan administration, I break down the importance of handling classified information, trust in leadership, and ethical conduct inside the executive branch. This is about intelligence leaks, White House advisors, classified information, national security, presidential authority, and government accountability. Watch the entire episode; Rumble: YouTube:

In this Liberty’s Voice clip, I explain why leaks from top intelligence officials are dangerous to the presidency and U.S. national security. Drawing on my experience in the Reagan administration, I break down the importance of handling classified information, trust in leadership, and ethical conduct inside the executive branch. This is about intelligence leaks, White House advisors, classified information, national security, presidential authority, and government accountability. Watch the entire episode; Rumble: YouTube:

Mark R. Levin

30,792 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, admitted that targets for the strike were discussed in the Signal chain. Our adversaries would go to great lengths to get this type of information and US security officials discussed it in an unsecured group chat without even checking to see who was in it. Their carelessness put our pilots' lives at risk.

Trump’s Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, admitted that targets for the strike were discussed in the Signal chain. Our adversaries would go to great lengths to get this type of information and US security officials discussed it in an unsecured group chat without even checking to see who was in it. Their carelessness put our pilots' lives at risk.

Senator Mark Kelly

105,550 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Tulsi Gabbard: "It was a mistake that a reporter was inadvertently added to a Signal chat with high-level national security principals having a policy discussion about imminent strikes against the Houthis." She just admitted there was classified information in the thread.

Tulsi Gabbard: "It was a mistake that a reporter was inadvertently added to a Signal chat with high-level national security principals having a policy discussion about imminent strikes against the Houthis." She just admitted there was classified information in the thread.

Blue Georgia

910,115 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Top national security officials discussed military plans in a Signal group chat that mistakenly included The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg. "The fact that it included somebody who is not cleared for that information and as a matter of fact was a member of the press is a serious breach and one that needs to be fully investigated," former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta tells Geoff Bennett.

Top national security officials discussed military plans in a Signal group chat that mistakenly included The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg. "The fact that it included somebody who is not cleared for that information and as a matter of fact was a member of the press is a serious breach and one that needs to be fully investigated," former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta tells Geoff Bennett.

PBS News

15,905 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Before politics I worked hard to protect our country from terrorists. National security will always be my top priority. When making decisions, national security is the first and last question I ask. 🇬🇧

Before politics I worked hard to protect our country from terrorists. National security will always be my top priority. When making decisions, national security is the first and last question I ask. 🇬🇧

Mike Tapp MP

23,649 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

BREAKING: The WH now says there was "no classified information shared in the signal chat" that Pete Hegseth shared with his wife and brother, among others. BULL SH!T! The chat reportedly included military attack plans. If that doesn’t qualify as classified, then the Trump administration’s handling of national security is even more reckless than we thought.

BREAKING: The WH now says there was "no classified information shared in the signal chat" that Pete Hegseth shared with his wife and brother, among others. BULL SH!T! The chat reportedly included military attack plans. If that doesn’t qualify as classified, then the Trump administration’s handling of national security is even more reckless than we thought.

Ed Krassenstein

383,786 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

PETE BUTTIGIEG: Every day I was in Afghanistan, I knew that I could die because of an intelligence failure. That if certain information about what I was doing got into the wrong hands, that that could cost me my life. But I also knew that everybody in my chain of command up and down, from the gunny sergeant sitting next to me in a vehicle to the colonel, to the then Secretary of Defense and President of the United States, took my security and the security of all of our troops seriously.

PETE BUTTIGIEG: Every day I was in Afghanistan, I knew that I could die because of an intelligence failure. That if certain information about what I was doing got into the wrong hands, that that could cost me my life. But I also knew that everybody in my chain of command up and down, from the gunny sergeant sitting next to me in a vehicle to the colonel, to the then Secretary of Defense and President of the United States, took my security and the security of all of our troops seriously.

CALL TO ACTIVISM

382,176 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Trump: "I was honored to receive the endorsement of...over 300 national security officials." On Sept. 22nd, 741 national security officials, including 15 retired four-star generals and admirals, endorsed Harris.

Trump: "I was honored to receive the endorsement of...over 300 national security officials." On Sept. 22nd, 741 national security officials, including 15 retired four-star generals and admirals, endorsed Harris.

Republican Accountability

188,048 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

I want you to remember that every right the government has ever taken away was removed under the false pretense of national security.

I want you to remember that every right the government has ever taken away was removed under the false pretense of national security.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr

709,056 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Ossoff: This is the same administration where Hegseth texted a national political reporter the classified details of impending U.S. Airstrikes If there was a threat, it's quite reasonable for the public and the congress to ask whether the poor operational security at this white house may have contributed to it

Ossoff: This is the same administration where Hegseth texted a national political reporter the classified details of impending U.S. Airstrikes If there was a threat, it's quite reasonable for the public and the congress to ask whether the poor operational security at this white house may have contributed to it

Acyn

35,918 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce