Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
"Everybody seemed to be seeing something different." ~CK 👽 😵 Abductees Encountering the Dead and Near-Death Experiencers Encountering Non-Human Intelligence 😵👽 How Long Are We Going to Ignore That? ⬆️ Plus, the phenomenon seems to be able to mess with our perceptions in a very troubling way. Dr. Colm... show more
30,662 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
17 Kommentare
Never heard a story of abductees encountering "dead people." Never heard an NDE survivor saying they saw a UFO. What kind of shit is this? You can say any fucking thing in this game.
They can see us, and we generally can't see them unless they want us to (or we develop our perception to do so). The 95% of the universe we can't directly observe is teeming with activity. If 5% of the universe takes 93 billion years to cross at 186,000 miles per second, and we have only examined a speck of it, imagine what 19X that might encompass.
I would not reduce the entire UAP phenomenon to a single category of NHI responsible for appearances in abductions, UFO encounters, apparitions, past-life experiences, near-death experiences, ghosts, or the so-called hitchhiker effect. Our tendency to explain all anomalous phenomena by attaching them to the same presumed NHI is far too common. Similarities between experiences may indicate overlap, interaction, or even a common mechanism in some cases, but similarity does not establish a common ontology or a single causal agent. We haven’t demonstrated that the intelligence reportedly encountered during an NDE is the same intelligence behind an apparition, an alleged abduction, or a structured object observed in the sky. Nor does establishing a correlation between two phenomena establish that one causes the other. Vallée’s work gives us good reason to question overly simplistic categories, but replacing “everything is extraterrestrial” with “everything is one interdimensional phenomenon” simply substitutes one reductionist explanation for another. I think the evidence is better approached without forcing it into a predetermined unified theory. Different phenomena may share characteristics while having very different origins. Until we can establish otherwise, plurality should remain a serious possibility.
As an NDE experiencer I have not encountered NHI Beings but I have encountered many Luminous Orbs over my neighborhood- several on video from last year. As recent as last night I saw 3 Orbs “power up bright” only to “ turn off” in the sky. Each time I feel happy- hopeful . 🙏
I haven’t been at this as long as most people, only a few years… but I haven’t yet come across a UFO experiencer that has said they saw individuals who were dead during it. I’m curious @TheUfoJoe, have you? And any that are most prominent which come to mind? Thanks!
Both can be true—reflections of the person's thoughts. NHI have access to our core consciousness.
Kit Green's leaked call said they're the watchers and sent as representatives of the supreme council of elders. Dr Michael Newton's hypnotic research also found many references to this council of elders. All of this seems to be about the afterlife and reincarnation.
I think there is a conflation between NDEs and abductions Two different things IMO: one is an invasive physical act and one is a spiritual experience
Be warned NHI are deceitful. A galactic war is one thing, intergalactic is another. NHI sciences making determinations, they easily and perhaps even joyfully play people. Call it the science “Why don’t they care”. The danger is great.
Some but not all experiencers claim to see dead people after the fact, but during? first I heard of it. Agreed, NDEs as well as OBEs can experience seeing passed over loved ones/relations and or in some cases NHI.
Possibly the most fascinating pattern in the phenomenon. There is an individual conciousnes specific and perspective specific variation to the visual. Just as a hologram can seem different from different angles except it is angles of conciousness . Therefore whatever medium this conciousness hologram , a “co-logram” must exists in, a conciousness field or a canvas thats directly accessible to conciousness. This is supported by the phenomenon not being captured on a canera but seen and recorded by humans in many cases.
Total ufo illiteracy strikes again. "everybody seems to see something different". No they don't.
Lmao 😂 that’s some pretty spooky stuff Joe. You better pray hard that the alien gods don’t mess with your perception.
Yeah, NDEs is a form of hallucination that NHI can embed itself to.
And don't forget about those that encounter NHI with ayahuasca/DMT ..
They make your mind see one thing But your eyes are actually see whats in front of you That conflicting images that allows me to break their hold on me I "see" the conflicting images, I focus on what my eyes are looking at. The illusion evaporates I punch whatever is near me
Haven’t heard of abductees encountering dead people, unless you mean seeing bodies or body parts? I have heard about that. This needs clarification.
![Weird Shit: "How Do You Handle Something Like That?" 👽 Is This ET? 👽 Lacatski: "Not necessarily." "The odd, large worm...literally putting by on the street. What is that all about? It seemed to just ignore the fact that there were multiple people watching it." ~Lacatski "It sounds crazy, but it went on and on and on." ~Lacatski (Many researchers or investigators might ignore eyewitness testimony if it's too "out there" for them. AAWSAP didn't do that, and that's why that program was so important. You don't self censor if you wanna have any chance at figuring out what the hell is going on.) ~ George Knapp (GK): "Jim Lacatski, a couple times in this book, 'Future Visions,' you reference human interaction and use the term with ETs. And I don't know if you really mean that ETs is what you think they are, or that's a placeholder, sort of a convenient name that people would understand. Where do you stand on that? Do you think that's the most likely answer to whatever this non-human intelligence is?" Dr. Jim Lacatski (JL): "Ummm. Not necessarily. I would say your term, placeholder, is the best." GK: "Back to the ranch for a minute, because, you know, there's so much strange stuff has been seen there, and you go into a lot of detail in this book as well. But, you know, you had operatives from AAWSAP expand around the ranch and contact neighbors, in a larger, ever-expanding circle, and found so many stories of weird stuff that people...you probably had to pry it out of them in some cases because it was so strange. "But not just on the ranch itself, but large worms that people would see, dog men, wolf men walking on two legs. Small, hairy troll-like creatures, pterodactyl-like beings. I remember one of the cases was, it was a gargoyle, in essence, a gargoyle. Little people. And these are not ancient, long-ago incidents for these residents, but fairly recent times, at least when the investigation was underway, right?" JL: "Correct. Well, we asked the questions, we were given the answers. Basically, most of these cases had multiple people undergoing the same experience. Now, if they saw something, you know, a landing of a craft. Well, multiple people saw it. Certainly [laughs], the odd, large worm putting by, literally putting by on the street, And you wonder [laughs], what is that all about? And, of course, it seemed to just ignore the fact that there [laughs] were multiple people watching it. "It sounds crazy, but it went on and on and on, as we did the reviews with people and the interviews with them. And when I say review, I mean that. It was like, we would go back to, and back. We would make sure that they weren't pulling our leg, in a sense. And they weren't. They were quite sincere, and multiple witnesses. So, again, in our official files, how do you handle something like that?" (It's almost as if the phenomenon was saying, "You think that was crazy? Hold my beer." 👽🐛)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2092043955492004225/amplify_video_thumb/2092040086842175488/img/NccnihyrDF9nL63x.jpg)
![Ritual abuse survivor/trauma therapist Max Lowen: "To be [a president], [you have to] go through rituals where you rape and sacrifice a child... So there's no good one...Bush Senior [is] one of the most evil... [And] Hillary Clinton. She is horrific... They're both pedophiles" This clip of Lowen (Max Lowen) is taken from a conversation with Kimberly Montgomery posted to Rumble on February 10, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "People who are going to be presidents. There's no such thing as us voting and electing them. That's a sham, too. It's to make us feel that we have chosen. If you think about it, even the choices we have are selected for us. But people are— Who they're going to put in the office is planned way ahead of time. "And so there's some that I have seen in the rituals. And I'll name Bush Senior as one of the most evil, horrifically cruel human beings that I've ever experienced. And I've experienced a lot of them. "So all of these people, I would name Hillary Clinton. She is horrific. She is a— They're both pedophiles. But honestly, if you're going to be in any presidential election capacity, you're going to have had to go through rituals where you rape and sacrifice a child to even be able to be in that office. So there's no good one. There's no good one. It's all fake, it's all theater. "And so, you know, with, the thing is with Biden, so the people who are on the Left, who are progressive and all that, they're good people. They went into that way of thinking and being. Because they're just like you said, they're good people. They care about the earth, they care about children, they care about things. But it's been socially engineered to become very communist and, in fact, very satanic. And they've inserted the pedophile agenda within the whole trans rights agenda to groom that forward. "So we had him in office, and then a whole swath of people support, supported this character, this actor, I'm, going to call it. On the other side, on the right, there were people who had woken up to certain things. They understood about child trafficking, they understood about, they'd be— The word deep state began to be thrown around. I was surprised. I thought, oh, wow, that's coming out in the common vernacular. "So what the cult is going to do is when something slips out of their control, they take it and they twisted around to control it again. So what they did is they framed the Left as the deep state and the Right as the savior of the deep state, starring Donald Trump, who's going to ride in on his white horse and vanquish the swamp and save everyone. And he's playing 5D chess. That's why he hasn't done anything he said, so they took these awake people and they psyop them into a savior program. "And Q was a great example of that. So Q was saying all these things that were true because the best mind control formula is, is truth mixed in with lies and inversion. So I remember someone arguing with me and saying, no, Q is real. It's good because, you know, otherwise they wouldn't say all these true things. And I said, yes, they would, because they're trying to capture those people that already know those things. "And he said, yeah, but then it'll wake up everybody else. And I said, no, it won't. People who are deeply mind-controlled will reject the truth when you present it to them. They will just say, oh, that's a conspiracy theory. So that's safe. So this was targeted at the ones who had awakened to a certain level. "What's the twist? Trust the plan. In other words, park yourself, do nothing. And then they enlist all these people who know there's a deep state, know there's child trafficking, know some of this stuff, and then they're supposed to follow their savior, who's going to actually clean up the deep state, who's part of the deep state, just like the other guy was. So that's the mind control psyop, and it keeps people captive and angry at each other."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2029084156874113530/amplify_video_thumb/2029083289999601664/img/6su5sNJp4m0Ba-Y6.jpg)
