Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

"Everyone Can't Come Directly to the Supreme Court" A dramatic exchange unfolded in the Supreme Court after a petitioner repeatedly insisted that her plea under Article 32 was maintainable, despite the Bench advising her to approach the jurisdictional High Court. As the arguments continued, the Court stressed the importance...

LawBeatInd's profile picture

LawBeat

81,465 subscribers

69,643 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.
3:34

SUPREME COMEDY In 2005, the Chief Information Commissioner asked the Supreme Court to declare the assets of its judges. The Supreme Court got angry. "We don't listen to orders. We give orders." The Supreme Court appealed to the Delhi High Court against the order of the Chief Information Commissioner. But the Delhi High Court said, "You have to release the information." So the Supreme Court appealed the decision of the Delhi High Court to a 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court. The 2-judge bench of the Delhi High Court referred the matter back to the Supreme Court, saying this is your matter, you decide. Now the Supreme Court became the judge, jury and executioner in its own case. Cricket bookies would kill to have such a fixed match. A single-judge bench of the Supreme Court took up the matter and said a 3-judge bench should decide the case. The 3-judge bench of the Supreme Court sat on the case for 8 long years and arrived at a verdict - the matter should be looked at by a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court. Finally in 2019, the 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court gave its verdict. It did not say that Supreme Court judges should declare their assets. It merely said the Supreme Court should release any information it had. So basically if a judge does not declare his assets, then there is nothing to declare. Comedy, yes. Funny, no.

KV Iyyer - BHARAT 🇮🇳🇮🇱

220,340 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

From High Court setback to Supreme Court showdown—Congress leader Pawan Khera knocks on the doors of the Supreme Court of India after the Gauhati High Court denies anticipatory bail in the Assam CM’s wife case. With serious allegations of forged documents, possible custodial interrogation, and claims of political vendetta, the battle now shifts to the apex court. Will the court uphold the High Court’s tough stance or offer limited relief under Article 21? The next hearing could decide whether Khera gets protection—or faces deeper legal trouble. Abhishek Singhvi #pawankhera #legalnews #latestnews #judiciary #supremecourtofindia
7:35

From High Court setback to Supreme Court showdown—Congress leader Pawan Khera knocks on the doors of the Supreme Court of India after the Gauhati High Court denies anticipatory bail in the Assam CM’s wife case. With serious allegations of forged documents, possible custodial interrogation, and claims of political vendetta, the battle now shifts to the apex court. Will the court uphold the High Court’s tough stance or offer limited relief under Article 21? The next hearing could decide whether Khera gets protection—or faces deeper legal trouble. Abhishek Singhvi #pawankhera #legalnews #latestnews #judiciary #supremecourtofindia

LawChakra

15,217 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Big news : Supreme Court stayed the Telangana High Court order granting transit anticipatory bail to Pawan Khera.... SC asked him to approach Assam court and also questions jurisdiction...
3:41

Big news : Supreme Court stayed the Telangana High Court order granting transit anticipatory bail to Pawan Khera.... SC asked him to approach Assam court and also questions jurisdiction...

Mr Sinha

14,396 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court REFUSES Congress candidate Meenakshi Natarajanʼs plea challenging the REJECTION of her Rajya Sabha nomination from Madhya Pradesh. => The Court held that once a nomination is REJECTED, the appropriate remedy is to approach the Election Commission.
1:57

🚨 HUGE! Supreme Court REFUSES Congress candidate Meenakshi Natarajanʼs plea challenging the REJECTION of her Rajya Sabha nomination from Madhya Pradesh. => The Court held that once a nomination is REJECTED, the appropriate remedy is to approach the Election Commission.

Megh Updates 🚨™

33,776 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"The Constitution of Nigeria says that any determination made by the supreme court is bidding on the lower Court. So I was actually surprised that high Courts have refused to obey or abide by the determination of the supreme court judgement".--- Nnamdi Kanu. #FreeNnamdiKanuNow #FreeNnamdiKanu
1:27

"The Constitution of Nigeria says that any determination made by the supreme court is bidding on the lower Court. So I was actually surprised that high Courts have refused to obey or abide by the determination of the supreme court judgement".--- Nnamdi Kanu. #FreeNnamdiKanuNow #FreeNnamdiKanu

Emeka Gift Official

17,295 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

A fiery courtroom moment unfolded in the Supreme Court of India as Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta clashed during a heated exchange — with Singhvi snapping, “Mr. Mehta, don’t interrupt me!” ⚖️🔥 But beyond the drama, the legal stakes were serious. The Supreme Court refused to extend the transit anticipatory bail earlier granted to Congress leader Pawan Khera by the Telangana High Court in a case filed by Assam Police. The case involves allegations of defamation, forgery, and criminal conspiracy. A Bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and AS Chandurkar made its position clear: 👉 “You go and file a petition in Assam. The court will take up.” This means no immediate relief from the Supreme Court — and Khera must now approach the competent court in Assam for further protection. 💥 Was this just a procedural decision… or a major setback? 💥 Is this about legal discipline or political implications? Watch the full breakdown as we decode the arguments, the courtroom tension, and what this means going forward.Abhishek Singhvi #SupremeCourt #PawanKhera #AbhishekManuSinghvi #TusharMehta #LegalNews #CourtroomDrama #IndianLaw #LawChakra
8:18

A fiery courtroom moment unfolded in the Supreme Court of India as Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta clashed during a heated exchange — with Singhvi snapping, “Mr. Mehta, don’t interrupt me!” ⚖️🔥 But beyond the drama, the legal stakes were serious. The Supreme Court refused to extend the transit anticipatory bail earlier granted to Congress leader Pawan Khera by the Telangana High Court in a case filed by Assam Police. The case involves allegations of defamation, forgery, and criminal conspiracy. A Bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and AS Chandurkar made its position clear: 👉 “You go and file a petition in Assam. The court will take up.” This means no immediate relief from the Supreme Court — and Khera must now approach the competent court in Assam for further protection. 💥 Was this just a procedural decision… or a major setback? 💥 Is this about legal discipline or political implications? Watch the full breakdown as we decode the arguments, the courtroom tension, and what this means going forward.Abhishek Singhvi #SupremeCourt #PawanKhera #AbhishekManuSinghvi #TusharMehta #LegalNews #CourtroomDrama #IndianLaw #LawChakra

LawChakra

66,637 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Of course, faux conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin describes the Virginia Supreme Court invoking the state's Constitution a "technicality that the Supreme Court decided to get hung up on." She suggests the VA Supreme Court was following Trump's orders.
1:08

Of course, faux conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin describes the Virginia Supreme Court invoking the state's Constitution a "technicality that the Supreme Court decided to get hung up on." She suggests the VA Supreme Court was following Trump's orders.

Nicholas Fondacaro

66,813 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

🚨 SHOCKING! A Bihar bribery case stunned the Supreme Court — The defence claimed RATS had DESTROYED the seized BRIBE CASH🤯 The bench remarked, "We were surprised the recovered notes were destroyed by rats." The case involves former Bihar CDPO Aruna Kumari, accused of taking a Rs 10,000 bribe. While hearing her appeal, the Supreme Court stayed her conviction and granted bail. The High Court had earlier sentenced her to 4 years under one charge and 3 years under another.
0:25

🚨 SHOCKING! A Bihar bribery case stunned the Supreme Court — The defence claimed RATS had DESTROYED the seized BRIBE CASH🤯 The bench remarked, "We were surprised the recovered notes were destroyed by rats." The case involves former Bihar CDPO Aruna Kumari, accused of taking a Rs 10,000 bribe. While hearing her appeal, the Supreme Court stayed her conviction and granted bail. The High Court had earlier sentenced her to 4 years under one charge and 3 years under another.

The Analyzer (News Updates🗞️)

63,509 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Presented facts and successfully argued in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India for Vijaybai Vyankat Suryawanshi. The Supreme Court maintained the order of the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court to file FIR and launch investigation as per the application made by Vijaybai on 24 December, 2024, in New Mondha Police Station, Parbhani. #JusticeForSomnathSuryawanshi
4:10

Presented facts and successfully argued in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India for Vijaybai Vyankat Suryawanshi. The Supreme Court maintained the order of the Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court to file FIR and launch investigation as per the application made by Vijaybai on 24 December, 2024, in New Mondha Police Station, Parbhani. #JusticeForSomnathSuryawanshi

Prakash Ambedkar

29,434 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

BREAKING: SUPREME COURT APPOINTMENT UNDER FIRE? Critics are arguing that Ketanji Brown Jackson was a "DEI hire" pushed by the Biden administration and lacks the necessary judicial qualifications for the Supreme Court. Some are even questioning the validity of her appointment. Do you believe her appointment to the Supreme Court should be invalidated? A. YES B. NO
0:20

BREAKING: SUPREME COURT APPOINTMENT UNDER FIRE? Critics are arguing that Ketanji Brown Jackson was a "DEI hire" pushed by the Biden administration and lacks the necessary judicial qualifications for the Supreme Court. Some are even questioning the validity of her appointment. Do you believe her appointment to the Supreme Court should be invalidated? A. YES B. NO

Marina

29,502 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

The Supreme Court is facing a corruption crisis. We need to expand the Supreme Court, enact term limits on Supreme Court Justices, enforce a binding code of ethics, and expedite impeachment proceedings. Thomas and Alito need to be impeached and removed from the bench.
2:25

The Supreme Court is facing a corruption crisis. We need to expand the Supreme Court, enact term limits on Supreme Court Justices, enforce a binding code of ethics, and expedite impeachment proceedings. Thomas and Alito need to be impeached and removed from the bench.

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib

1,017,010 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

UPDATE: State Prosecutor Brian Kalinaki has asked Masaka High Court to return Fr Deusdedit Ssekabira’s case to the Chief Magistrate’s Court for plea in a Shs500 million money laundering case. Fr Ssekabira appeared before High Court judge Justice Victoria Nakintu Katamba, with the prosecution arguing that the procedure used to bring him before the High Court was improper since he was not committed by the lower court. The prosecution, which earlier said it was ready to proceed, told court on Tuesday that the High Court lacks jurisdiction. The judge is expected to deliver her ruling at 2pm. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba
3:29

UPDATE: State Prosecutor Brian Kalinaki has asked Masaka High Court to return Fr Deusdedit Ssekabira’s case to the Chief Magistrate’s Court for plea in a Shs500 million money laundering case. Fr Ssekabira appeared before High Court judge Justice Victoria Nakintu Katamba, with the prosecution arguing that the procedure used to bring him before the High Court was improper since he was not committed by the lower court. The prosecution, which earlier said it was ready to proceed, told court on Tuesday that the High Court lacks jurisdiction. The judge is expected to deliver her ruling at 2pm. #MonitorUpdates 📹: Gertrude Mutyaba

Daily Monitor

145,274 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The Supreme Court revived a lawsuit from an Ohio woman who claimed she was the victim of reverse discrimination due to her employer denying her a promotion because she is straight. Lower courts had thrown out the case, but the Supreme Court ruled she should have her day in court.
1:31

The Supreme Court revived a lawsuit from an Ohio woman who claimed she was the victim of reverse discrimination due to her employer denying her a promotion because she is straight. Lower courts had thrown out the case, but the Supreme Court ruled she should have her day in court.

CBS Evening News

15,395 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

The Democrats will expand the Supreme Court. BUTTIGIEG: "I think it's not so radical to suggest a different makeup of the Supreme Court. By the way… You know what article of the Constitution says that there are 9 Supreme Court justices? Trick question, it's not in there!"
0:22

The Democrats will expand the Supreme Court. BUTTIGIEG: "I think it's not so radical to suggest a different makeup of the Supreme Court. By the way… You know what article of the Constitution says that there are 9 Supreme Court justices? Trick question, it's not in there!"

Colin Wright

702,174 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Justice Tariq Jahangiri's suspension case: Once again five Islamabad High Court Judges are in the Supreme Court.
0:51

Justice Tariq Jahangiri's suspension case: Once again five Islamabad High Court Judges are in the Supreme Court.

Hasnaat Malik

52,924 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce