Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Everyone is asking, “Which AI is better?” Wrong question. Gemini Pro 3.1 and Claude Sonnet 4.6 are built for different battles. Gemini wins when you need speed, scale, and multimodal power. Claude wins when logic, structure, and long-context reasoning actually matter. The real advantage? Knowing when to use each.

JulianGoldieSEO's profile picture

Julian Goldie SEO

158,423 subscribers

10,507 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

This is what you get when Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 work together in Antigravity plan by Opus 4.6, code by 3.1 Pro
1:09

This is what you get when Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 work together in Antigravity plan by Opus 4.6, code by 3.1 Pro

Harshith

70,631 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Claude 4.6 and Gemini 3 together are wild. This is the new AI product stack 🧵 Claude 4.6: – 1M token context window – Reads entire codebases – Handles multi-step workflows – Connects APIs cleanly – Automates backend logic Gemini 3: – Multimodal (text, image, video, audio) – Designs UI + layout – Structures landing pages – Powers AI-native dev (AntiGravity IDE) Here’s the play: 1. Prompt Gemini to design the landing page. 2. Take output to Claude. 3. Prompt Claude to build backend automation. Result? Lead form → email list → CRM tag → welcome sequence. All built from prompts. This is what a 2-person AI team looks like.
8:03

Claude 4.6 and Gemini 3 together are wild. This is the new AI product stack 🧵 Claude 4.6: – 1M token context window – Reads entire codebases – Handles multi-step workflows – Connects APIs cleanly – Automates backend logic Gemini 3: – Multimodal (text, image, video, audio) – Designs UI + layout – Structures landing pages – Powers AI-native dev (AntiGravity IDE) Here’s the play: 1. Prompt Gemini to design the landing page. 2. Take output to Claude. 3. Prompt Claude to build backend automation. Result? Lead form → email list → CRM tag → welcome sequence. All built from prompts. This is what a 2-person AI team looks like.

Julian Goldie SEO

25,802 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Another one Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 in Antigravity plan - Opus 4.6, code - 3.1 Pro It took < 1 hour to vibecode
0:54

Another one Gemini 3.1 Pro (High) and Claude Opus 4.6 in Antigravity plan - Opus 4.6, code - 3.1 Pro It took < 1 hour to vibecode

Harshith

46,632 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Using the wrong AI model for your project? Here's how to pick between Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro: - For coding complex apps: Use Claude 4 Opus with extended thinking mode. - For everyday content creation: Use Claude 4 Sonnet for humanized, engaging copy. - For budget-friendly projects with large context: Use Gemini 2.5 Pro at $1.25 vs Claude's $15 per million tokens. - For autonomous agent tasks: Claude 4 wins with MCP integration and browser control. - For simple drawing apps: Both work, but Claude creates more advanced functionality. Save this video, you'll never pick the wrong AI model again. Want the SOP? DM me. 💬
16:05

Using the wrong AI model for your project? Here's how to pick between Claude 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro: - For coding complex apps: Use Claude 4 Opus with extended thinking mode. - For everyday content creation: Use Claude 4 Sonnet for humanized, engaging copy. - For budget-friendly projects with large context: Use Gemini 2.5 Pro at $1.25 vs Claude's $15 per million tokens. - For autonomous agent tasks: Claude 4 wins with MCP integration and browser control. - For simple drawing apps: Both work, but Claude creates more advanced functionality. Save this video, you'll never pick the wrong AI model again. Want the SOP? DM me. 💬

Julian Goldie SEO

11,883 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Which LLM reasons best when it doesn't have all the information? Enter LLM Poker Arena to find out. It's a Poker Playing benchmark where top reasoning models play Texas Hold'em poker against each other. Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Grok 4 all sit at the same table and play full tournaments to see who finishes with the chips. Poker is very different when it comes to reasoning. It has to balance probabilistic reasoning, opponent modeling and make decisions under uncertainty. Poker is an interesting evaluation because it tests reasoning under incomplete information, something most coding benchmarks do not capture. In this tournaments the rules are: - Each LLM starts with $1,000 chips - Small and big blinds start at $25 / $50 - Blinds double every 3 minutes - All models run in their reasoning or thinking modes After the first 5 tournaments: - Claude Opus 4.5 with Thinking has 3 wins - GPT-5.2 has 2 wins - Grok 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro have 0 wins Early results suggest Claude performs quite well at poker as well. Also five is a very small sample size. Planning to run many more tournaments, publish the full benchmark data and add a prediction market on top of it. Thanks for the suggestion clipz. Much more coming as part of Poker Cities !! This was built on Replit ⠕ using their AI integrations, which made it straightforward to connect Claude, GPT, and Gemini. What model do you think wins after 100 tournaments?
0:22

Which LLM reasons best when it doesn't have all the information? Enter LLM Poker Arena to find out. It's a Poker Playing benchmark where top reasoning models play Texas Hold'em poker against each other. Claude Opus 4.5, GPT-5.2, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and Grok 4 all sit at the same table and play full tournaments to see who finishes with the chips. Poker is very different when it comes to reasoning. It has to balance probabilistic reasoning, opponent modeling and make decisions under uncertainty. Poker is an interesting evaluation because it tests reasoning under incomplete information, something most coding benchmarks do not capture. In this tournaments the rules are: - Each LLM starts with $1,000 chips - Small and big blinds start at $25 / $50 - Blinds double every 3 minutes - All models run in their reasoning or thinking modes After the first 5 tournaments: - Claude Opus 4.5 with Thinking has 3 wins - GPT-5.2 has 2 wins - Grok 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro have 0 wins Early results suggest Claude performs quite well at poker as well. Also five is a very small sample size. Planning to run many more tournaments, publish the full benchmark data and add a prediction market on top of it. Thanks for the suggestion clipz. Much more coming as part of Poker Cities !! This was built on Replit ⠕ using their AI integrations, which made it straightforward to connect Claude, GPT, and Gemini. What model do you think wins after 100 tournaments?

Anshul Dhawan

32,192 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This is Claude Sonnet 4.6: our most capable Sonnet model yet. It’s a full upgrade across coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, knowledge work, and design. It also features a 1M token context window in beta.
1:29

This is Claude Sonnet 4.6: our most capable Sonnet model yet. It’s a full upgrade across coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, knowledge work, and design. It also features a 1M token context window in beta.

Claude

7,589,104 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

145 days ago: $0. Today: $43k revenue and BridgeSpace is LIVE 🔥 Watch the 4.5-min demo: GPT 5.4, Claude Opus 4.6 & Gemini 3.1 Pro actually talk to each other. They coordinate and finish tasks while you sleep. One swarm. Fully orchestrated. Use LAUNCH20 for 20% off → Who’s handing their next project to the swarm? 👇
4:35

145 days ago: $0. Today: $43k revenue and BridgeSpace is LIVE 🔥 Watch the 4.5-min demo: GPT 5.4, Claude Opus 4.6 & Gemini 3.1 Pro actually talk to each other. They coordinate and finish tasks while you sleep. One swarm. Fully orchestrated. Use LAUNCH20 for 20% off → Who’s handing their next project to the swarm? 👇

BridgeMind

12,670 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

You can now run three frontier models at once and select your orchestrator model directly inside Perplexity Computer. Model Council automatically runs GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro simultaneously. Three frontier models. One workflow. Best answer wins.
0:32

You can now run three frontier models at once and select your orchestrator model directly inside Perplexity Computer. Model Council automatically runs GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 3.1 Pro simultaneously. Three frontier models. One workflow. Best answer wins.

Computer

84,097 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Claude Code performs a complete analysis of Gemini-CLI and OpenAI Codex using Deep Graph MCP... one command to implement Claude Code automatically pulls two popular AI assistant repos and performs deep architectural analysis to determine which one is actually better built. Single command to implement: claude mcp add "Deep Graph MCP" npx -- -y mcp-code-graph@latest google-gemini/gemini-cli openai/codex The results might surprise you 👇
1:23

Claude Code performs a complete analysis of Gemini-CLI and OpenAI Codex using Deep Graph MCP... one command to implement Claude Code automatically pulls two popular AI assistant repos and performs deep architectural analysis to determine which one is actually better built. Single command to implement: claude mcp add "Deep Graph MCP" npx -- -y mcp-code-graph@latest google-gemini/gemini-cli openai/codex The results might surprise you 👇

Daniel San

68,001 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

I'm sorry Claude Sonnet 4 but Gemini wins! Same prompt, all interactive app with clearly better design & navigation
0:48

I'm sorry Claude Sonnet 4 but Gemini wins! Same prompt, all interactive app with clearly better design & navigation

Nick

121,699 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

So Google has just released the best model in the world?! Gemini 3.1 Pro is already available in: → Gemini App → Antigravity → Google AI Studio And it has insane capabilities when it comes to complex tasks and coding! (Roughly 2x cheaper than Opus 4.6 btw)
0:25

So Google has just released the best model in the world?! Gemini 3.1 Pro is already available in: → Gemini App → Antigravity → Google AI Studio And it has insane capabilities when it comes to complex tasks and coding! (Roughly 2x cheaper than Opus 4.6 btw)

Paul Couvert

39,652 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Claude Sonnet 3.5 Artifacts is now available to use with GPT-4o, Gemini, Llama-3 and other LLMs for just $10 a month. Build interactive experiences, search the web, generate images and audio with GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 in just one AI playground.
0:38

Claude Sonnet 3.5 Artifacts is now available to use with GPT-4o, Gemini, Llama-3 and other LLMs for just $10 a month. Build interactive experiences, search the web, generate images and audio with GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 in just one AI playground.

Shubham Saboo

27,452 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

We gave frontier AI coding agents 24 hours to write a complete Game Boy Advance emulator from scratch. GPT-5.5's emulator runs games best, with Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.7 close behind. Gemini 3.1 Pro failed to produce a working emulator.
0:30

We gave frontier AI coding agents 24 hours to write a complete Game Boy Advance emulator from scratch. GPT-5.5's emulator runs games best, with Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Opus 4.7 close behind. Gemini 3.1 Pro failed to produce a working emulator.

Mechanize

94,441 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Anthropic just dropped Claude Opus 4.1 It outperforms OpenAI o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen-3 Coder on agentic coding and tool use. Claude Code is going to get incredibly better.
0:26

Anthropic just dropped Claude Opus 4.1 It outperforms OpenAI o3, Gemini 2.5 Pro and Qwen-3 Coder on agentic coding and tool use. Claude Code is going to get incredibly better.

Shubham Saboo

26,252 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Best Solar System Visualization By Gemini 3.1 Pro Guys one thing is quite clear AI Studio High reasoning version is better than gemini app , no matter what subscription you have Google Should atleast give option to choose reasoning level in the app , tag google guy
1:13

Best Solar System Visualization By Gemini 3.1 Pro Guys one thing is quite clear AI Studio High reasoning version is better than gemini app , no matter what subscription you have Google Should atleast give option to choose reasoning level in the app , tag google guy

Chetaslua

168,788 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Multimodal Reasoning AI Agents are here with Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking I built a multimodal AI agent that can reason and understand images using gemini flash reasoning LLM. 100% Opensource Code with step-by-step tutorial.
0:20

Multimodal Reasoning AI Agents are here with Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking I built a multimodal AI agent that can reason and understand images using gemini flash reasoning LLM. 100% Opensource Code with step-by-step tutorial.

Shubham Saboo

36,596 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

It's not only about how long your context is, but how well you use it. Great to see Gemini 2.5 models dominating MRCR and other benchmarks on long context! See 2.5 Pro tackle a complex coding task by reasoning over an entire repo (>500k tokens). Performance and effective use of the (loooong) context windows are what really matter!
1:11

It's not only about how long your context is, but how well you use it. Great to see Gemini 2.5 models dominating MRCR and other benchmarks on long context! See 2.5 Pro tackle a complex coding task by reasoning over an entire repo (>500k tokens). Performance and effective use of the (loooong) context windows are what really matter!

Oriol Vinyals

27,008 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini would Use Nukes, and Grok 4.20 is Based
3:04

ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini would Use Nukes, and Grok 4.20 is Based

Sir Doge of the Coin ⚔️

23,720 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

My most-used AI tool isn’t ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini. It’s Sider AI Sider with Gemini 2.5 Pro. These are my top use cases and why I prefer Sider 👇 1/10 Sider AI + Gemini 2.5 Pro is my favorite way to get insights from arXiv papers.
0:22

My most-used AI tool isn’t ChatGPT, Claude, or Gemini. It’s Sider AI Sider with Gemini 2.5 Pro. These are my top use cases and why I prefer Sider 👇 1/10 Sider AI + Gemini 2.5 Pro is my favorite way to get insights from arXiv papers.

AshutoshShrivastava

36,284 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Google just dropped Gemini 2.5 Pro with native thinking capabilities. It outperforms OpenAI o3-mini, GPT 4.5, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, DeepSeek R1 and features 1 million context with tool use and structured outputs. 100% free on Google AI Studio and via API.
0:44

Google just dropped Gemini 2.5 Pro with native thinking capabilities. It outperforms OpenAI o3-mini, GPT 4.5, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, DeepSeek R1 and features 1 million context with tool use and structured outputs. 100% free on Google AI Studio and via API.

Shubham Saboo

26,724 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr