Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Everyone knows if Charles stopped interfering with RAVEC & allowed the experts to do their jobs, Harry & Meghan would be shown to face the greatest security threats … even more than Charles himself. That would expose the withdrawal of their security as the spiteful act it was.

ZandiSussex's profile picture

Senior Lieutenant Zandi Sussex

18,441 subscribers

48,159 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

ComedyNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We now know it was Charles & William actively working to endanger Harry, Meghan & Archie’s lives by leaking their location whilst simultaneously withdrawing security. They wanted them back as slaves … or else dead. Even Shakespeare would be shocked at this level of family evil.
1:44

Sensitive content

We now know it was Charles & William actively working to endanger Harry, Meghan & Archie’s lives by leaking their location whilst simultaneously withdrawing security. They wanted them back as slaves … or else dead. Even Shakespeare would be shocked at this level of family evil.

Senior Lieutenant Zandi Sussex

76,698 views • 1 year ago

EVEN MEGHAN KNEW SECURITY WAS DECIDED BY THE FAMILY. “I even wrote letters to his family saying please….please keep my husband safe……please don’t pull his security and announce to the world when he and we are most vulnerable.” Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex Royal reporters have helped King Charles the Cruel hide behind RAVEC as being the one to deny Harry security when he influenced and had final say all along. Meghan is a smart woman. If RAVEC or the government had the power over security she would have written to them. She wrote to the family member she knew who could keep his son protected if he wanted. But he didn’t want to. Bear in mind that meant he did not want Archie protected either! #KingCharlesTheCruel
0:41

EVEN MEGHAN KNEW SECURITY WAS DECIDED BY THE FAMILY. “I even wrote letters to his family saying please….please keep my husband safe……please don’t pull his security and announce to the world when he and we are most vulnerable.” Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex Royal reporters have helped King Charles the Cruel hide behind RAVEC as being the one to deny Harry security when he influenced and had final say all along. Meghan is a smart woman. If RAVEC or the government had the power over security she would have written to them. She wrote to the family member she knew who could keep his son protected if he wanted. But he didn’t want to. Bear in mind that meant he did not want Archie protected either! #KingCharlesTheCruel

Glow Lee

35,535 views • 9 months ago

“Pot, Kettle, Black…. (King Charles) has broke more rules than he Harry would ever do.” Caller Graham is in favour of Prince Harry having security. “I was a young soldier I’ve seen some of the antics our king now got into, which i’m not allowed to say because of the official secrets act.”
2:11

“Pot, Kettle, Black…. (King Charles) has broke more rules than he Harry would ever do.” Caller Graham is in favour of Prince Harry having security. “I was a young soldier I’ve seen some of the antics our king now got into, which i’m not allowed to say because of the official secrets act.”

Glow Lee

11,464 views • 1 month ago

As ever, the greatest threats to the privacy and security of Harry, Meghan and their children is Meghan Markle and her desperate need to prove she’s not hating every second of being back in the U.K. by posting on Instagram.
0:34

As ever, the greatest threats to the privacy and security of Harry, Meghan and their children is Meghan Markle and her desperate need to prove she’s not hating every second of being back in the U.K. by posting on Instagram.

Royal News Network

62,370 views • 1 month ago

PLEASE WATCH THIS CLIP FOR INSIGHT ON THE ROYAL FAMILY’S SOPHISTICATED DISCREET INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE & UNFAIRNESS!!!! I also encourage you to rewatch the whole Oprah interview with Prince Harry and Meghan. There’s so much that is forgotten and so much that makes so much more sense now. ♦️Although this section of the interview exposed and therefore probably scuppered the Royal Family’s plan to change the convention so as to not have the Sussex’s children be titled Prince/Princesses when Charles their grandfather ascended to the throne after all, Meghan gives a vivid picture of what she and Harry faced behind palace doors that royal reporters have tried to distract us from by pretending they lied or focusing on the racism stuff. ♦️It shows how the Royal Family uses character assassination campaigns by their media pals, threats to deny titles and therefore security in order to dehumanise the un-favoured members of the family behind the scenes whilst still using them to promote the monarchy. ♦️Of course Harry and Meghan would not want to hard launch Archie’s life as if he would be a public high profile royal by parading him to the public at birth outside the hospital if behind the scenes the discussion by the family was to delegitimise him, ensure he gets no security and possibly subject him to the character assassination H&M realised the Royal family were allowing to happen against them, meaning that if this happened to Archie he would be more vulnerable without security. They let Meghan (and Harry)be criticised to high heaven for treating & protecting Archie from a public glare that should not come without security and was reasonable if he was not to be a titled royal. ♦️It’s also highly manipulative that in laying the groundwork, royal reporters told us that Harry and Meghan did not want their children to be titled, and they silenced them from correcting that so that if they did indeed change the convention and Archie was not titled, the public would be led to believe it was H&M that wanted this and not the royal family/the firm. The institution would feign innocence. ♦️It’s only since leaving that Harry and Meghan have been able to say their truth against strong calls from royal family proxies for them to be ‘private’ =be silent =hide the institutional abuse which would eventually be directed at Archie and Lilibet.
6:24

PLEASE WATCH THIS CLIP FOR INSIGHT ON THE ROYAL FAMILY’S SOPHISTICATED DISCREET INSTITUTIONAL ABUSE & UNFAIRNESS!!!! I also encourage you to rewatch the whole Oprah interview with Prince Harry and Meghan. There’s so much that is forgotten and so much that makes so much more sense now. ♦️Although this section of the interview exposed and therefore probably scuppered the Royal Family’s plan to change the convention so as to not have the Sussex’s children be titled Prince/Princesses when Charles their grandfather ascended to the throne after all, Meghan gives a vivid picture of what she and Harry faced behind palace doors that royal reporters have tried to distract us from by pretending they lied or focusing on the racism stuff. ♦️It shows how the Royal Family uses character assassination campaigns by their media pals, threats to deny titles and therefore security in order to dehumanise the un-favoured members of the family behind the scenes whilst still using them to promote the monarchy. ♦️Of course Harry and Meghan would not want to hard launch Archie’s life as if he would be a public high profile royal by parading him to the public at birth outside the hospital if behind the scenes the discussion by the family was to delegitimise him, ensure he gets no security and possibly subject him to the character assassination H&M realised the Royal family were allowing to happen against them, meaning that if this happened to Archie he would be more vulnerable without security. They let Meghan (and Harry)be criticised to high heaven for treating & protecting Archie from a public glare that should not come without security and was reasonable if he was not to be a titled royal. ♦️It’s also highly manipulative that in laying the groundwork, royal reporters told us that Harry and Meghan did not want their children to be titled, and they silenced them from correcting that so that if they did indeed change the convention and Archie was not titled, the public would be led to believe it was H&M that wanted this and not the royal family/the firm. The institution would feign innocence. ♦️It’s only since leaving that Harry and Meghan have been able to say their truth against strong calls from royal family proxies for them to be ‘private’ =be silent =hide the institutional abuse which would eventually be directed at Archie and Lilibet.

Glow Lee

10,976 views • 9 months ago

“I’m so glad Prince Harry is not staying at Buckingham Palace,…. Charles is rich…. he can pay for it (security), …he should be ashamed of himself….. he can overrule RAVEC if he wants to and I would overrule it for my grandchildren” #KingCharlesTheCruel #DeadBeatDadKingCharles #BadDadKingCharles
1:25

“I’m so glad Prince Harry is not staying at Buckingham Palace,…. Charles is rich…. he can pay for it (security), …he should be ashamed of himself….. he can overrule RAVEC if he wants to and I would overrule it for my grandchildren” #KingCharlesTheCruel #DeadBeatDadKingCharles #BadDadKingCharles

Glow Lee

26,614 views • 3 months ago

#KingCharlesIII told Prince Harry that he should drop his case suing the tabloids because it was “suicide mission ”. Then Harry was told to drop it or loose security when he didn’t ,he lost security. The lengths Charles &William will go to to protect the tabloids is insane.
0:45

#KingCharlesIII told Prince Harry that he should drop his case suing the tabloids because it was “suicide mission ”. Then Harry was told to drop it or loose security when he didn’t ,he lost security. The lengths Charles &William will go to to protect the tabloids is insane.

Claire

48,368 views • 2 years ago

As Bronte Coy acknowledges that Prince Harry and Meghan were mobbed by people excited and happy to see them in Australia she is asked by Sky News whether they would be able to come to the Uk with the limited security they have had there? I guess she thinks not. Let see if Bad Dad King Charles continues to block it. #HarryAndMeghanInAustralia
1:53

As Bronte Coy acknowledges that Prince Harry and Meghan were mobbed by people excited and happy to see them in Australia she is asked by Sky News whether they would be able to come to the Uk with the limited security they have had there? I guess she thinks not. Let see if Bad Dad King Charles continues to block it. #HarryAndMeghanInAustralia

Glow Lee

14,051 views • 6 months ago

💥Flashback-Flash Forward💥 The King does not control RAVEC. It is an independent committee that operates on behalf of the UK government. If the King demanded Harry & Meghan get publicly paid security, would taxpayers agree? Harry lost his appeal & in 2026, RAVEC initiated a fresh risk assessment regarding his threat level- deliberations continue.
1:56

💥Flashback-Flash Forward💥 The King does not control RAVEC. It is an independent committee that operates on behalf of the UK government. If the King demanded Harry & Meghan get publicly paid security, would taxpayers agree? Harry lost his appeal & in 2026, RAVEC initiated a fresh risk assessment regarding his threat level- deliberations continue.

Deanna

14,646 views • 4 months ago

Harry and Meghan moving back to the UK? I’m gonna need more than “sources say.” Security questions remain, King Charles reportedly only found out days ago, and the Sussexes haven’t publicly confirmed it. Until Harry and Meghan say it themselves, my eyebrow stays raised. 🤨
3:07

Harry and Meghan moving back to the UK? I’m gonna need more than “sources say.” Security questions remain, King Charles reportedly only found out days ago, and the Sussexes haven’t publicly confirmed it. Until Harry and Meghan say it themselves, my eyebrow stays raised. 🤨

The Notorious JTB

22,836 views • 1 month ago

"Why on earth would they turn up at the coronation? "Because that is where the money is... that is gold dust for their next Netflix series." Do you agree with Piers? Should Harry and Meghan go to the coronation of King Charles? Piers Morgan | Talk | #PMU
0:39

"Why on earth would they turn up at the coronation? "Because that is where the money is... that is gold dust for their next Netflix series." Do you agree with Piers? Should Harry and Meghan go to the coronation of King Charles? Piers Morgan | Talk | #PMU

Piers Morgan Uncensored

416,227 views • 3 years ago

Was this the moment Meghan Markle destroyed her reputation?! The Royal Family gave that scallywag everything that would have never been afforded to the girlfriend of the 5th in Line Charles paid for over £1.4M in clothing & jewelry for Meghan & it STILL wasn’t good enough
0:27

Was this the moment Meghan Markle destroyed her reputation?! The Royal Family gave that scallywag everything that would have never been afforded to the girlfriend of the 5th in Line Charles paid for over £1.4M in clothing & jewelry for Meghan & it STILL wasn’t good enough

MeghansMole©️

588,124 views • 1 year ago

"No one knew about it - except the King, Harry and Meghan!" Katie Nicholl reveals King Charles kept the meeting with Prince Harry a secret, to show his son that visits can be done without armed security. 📺 Katie Nicholl | The Royal Butler | Samara Gill
1:52

"No one knew about it - except the King, Harry and Meghan!" Katie Nicholl reveals King Charles kept the meeting with Prince Harry a secret, to show his son that visits can be done without armed security. 📺 Katie Nicholl | The Royal Butler | Samara Gill

The Royals Uncensored

72,382 views • 3 months ago

James O'Brien imagines what a rightwing headline would look like today if they wanted the public to hate King Charles rather than Harry and Meghan... ＠mrjamesob
2:58

James O'Brien imagines what a rightwing headline would look like today if they wanted the public to hate King Charles rather than Harry and Meghan... ＠mrjamesob

LBC

874,939 views • 3 years ago

Penny Junor Camilla's close friend absolutely confirming that Charles and his friends were the ones promoting and authorising the stories about princess Diana being mad, unstable, Mark Bolland himself, the person who rehabilitated Camilla and had the agreement to sell Harry to the press as long as Charles and William was protected, was part of it too. As i have repeatedly said. Prince William did to Harry and Meghan exactly what Charles and Camilla did to Diana.
2:20

Penny Junor Camilla's close friend absolutely confirming that Charles and his friends were the ones promoting and authorising the stories about princess Diana being mad, unstable, Mark Bolland himself, the person who rehabilitated Camilla and had the agreement to sell Harry to the press as long as Charles and William was protected, was part of it too. As i have repeatedly said. Prince William did to Harry and Meghan exactly what Charles and Camilla did to Diana.

Nina

29,995 views • 1 month ago

The BBC called out for covering up the story about the corruption in the royal family. Viewers complained &asked What was more important than reporting that King Charles and Prince William are “ scamming nhs and charities ”.Just imagine if this was Harry &Meghan? #Dispatches
2:20

The BBC called out for covering up the story about the corruption in the royal family. Viewers complained &asked What was more important than reporting that King Charles and Prince William are “ scamming nhs and charities ”.Just imagine if this was Harry &Meghan? #Dispatches

Claire

218,196 views • 1 year ago

A public apology to King Charles could be the next step in Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's reported effort to heal their fractured relationship with the royal family.
1:16

A public apology to King Charles could be the next step in Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's reported effort to heal their fractured relationship with the royal family.

OK! Magazine USA

23,790 views • 2 months ago