Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

"Everyone may be positioned for the wrong economy" Mark Moss says growth has stopped being rate sensitive, and the gap between what the economy and the government can tolerate is the Bitcoin case "Everyone's still the generals fighting the last war. We're waiting for 2008 to happen again. We're...

33,995 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

9 Kommentare

Profilbild von The Wolf Of All Streets
The Wolf Of All Streetsvor 6 Tagen

FT @1MarkMoss This clip is brought to you by @hodlwithLedn

Profilbild von Ebrahim
Ebrahimvor 6 Tagen

government cant tolerate its own rates is the most honest sentence in that clip

Profilbild von JCACTrades
JCACTradesvor 6 Tagen

if the economy can actually tolerate 5% rates while the government can’t then that’s a very different Bitcoin argument than the usual inflation story

Profilbild von CryptoCribz
CryptoCribzvor 6 Tagen

Moss prolly right here!

Profilbild von Punaywee✨
Punaywee✨vor 6 Tagen

I can't tell whether I want to laugh or happy-cry. I could write a whole diary entry about the feeling.

Profilbild von Bitcoin Clarity
Bitcoin Clarityvor 6 Tagen

The government debt angle is probably the strongest part of this thesis. If the economy can handle higher rates but the government can’t, Bitcoin’s fixed supply starts looking like a pretty interesting hedge against that mismatch.

Profilbild von Macro Bombastic
Macro Bombasticvor 6 Tagen

yeah the market keeps pricing the last crisis while the real shift is happening now

Profilbild von Mei Yi Xing
Mei Yi Xingvor 6 Tagen

Private capex can shrug at 50bp. The Treasury cannot

Profilbild von qazzaq.eth
qazzaq.ethvor 6 Tagen

the govt cant tolerate higher rates part is the whole thesis tbh

Ähnliche Videos

David Friedberg: Higher Interest Rates Are About to Make America’s $40 Trillion Debt Problem Much Worse “The federal government has a problem because over the next 12 months they have to refinance $10 trillion of debt. That debt is coming due. Those bonds are now due. They have to pay the principal back to the bond holders, and they have to go back to the treasury market and sell more treasuries to borrow more money to refinance. So the borrowing cost now is going to climb up, and when that borrowing cost climbs up, the federal government's burn goes up and the fiscal deficit goes up. So my theory and my argument on this is: There is no action that Bessent can take that's actually going to have a meaningful effect on the long end of the curve. We have a fundamental fiscal spending problem with the federal government right now. It is very expensive now to borrow money if you're the US federal government. And the reason is persistent inflation, I would argue because of excess government spending on social programs and other things. And the big problem at this point is the federal government is spending so much that if they were to cut spending aggressively, the argument and the concern is it would hit unemployment and it would cause a recession because the federal government is such an intricate part of the economy now. That's the argument. But it's causing inflation, and it's causing deficit spending. So this year the deficit will be roughly $2 trillion. And as a result, the market is saying, ‘We're worried about the US fiscal solvency over the long run, or there's a higher risk. As a result, we're going to charge you a higher interest, 5.2% on the 30 year.’ What does this mean for the federal government? Well, today, the federal government's average cost of debt is 3.4%. That's what we're paying on interest on average on the $40 trillion of debt that the federal government has outstanding. For every 1% change in the interest rate, the US government has to pay 1.25% of GDP in excess interest each year. 1.25% of GDP in interest each year for that 1% change in the interest rate.”

The All-In Podcast

333,940 Aufrufe • vor 19 Tagen