Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🤯 EVERYONE THINKS STRC IS THE NEXT TERRA LUNA. THEY ARE WRONG. STRC just hit $82, well under its $100 par. The market is panicking about a death spiral. This is not that. Luna collapsed because the asset behind it was worthless. STRC is backed by Strategy's balance sheet....

misterrcrypto's profile picture

Mister Crypto

139,563 subscribers

25,003 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"STRC is nothing like Terra Luna. It's a NASDAQ-listed instrument backed by a $50 billion balance sheet with 28 years of dividend runway. It's not a stablecoin. It has no peg. People are just searching for a villain near the bottom of a bear market." - Joe Consorti
2:24

"STRC is nothing like Terra Luna. It's a NASDAQ-listed instrument backed by a $50 billion balance sheet with 28 years of dividend runway. It's not a stablecoin. It has no peg. People are just searching for a villain near the bottom of a bear market." - Joe Consorti

TFTC

23,713 views • 1 month ago

STRC - SAYLOR'S INFINITE MONEY GLITCH IS DOMINATING People don't understand how POWERFUL STRC is, and how much WEALTH will flow into Bitcoin because of it. You will learn: How STRC is the best fixed income instrument in the world How STRC is a perpetual capital transmutation engine. How Saylor is turning your yield addiction into Bitcoin fuel Why this structure is mathematically safer than government bonds How STRC functions as a shadow central bank with an incorruptible balance sheet And why nobody in power is stopping it... because they still don’t understand it STRC is the FINAL FORM of CAPITAL MARKETS WARFARE
16:58

STRC - SAYLOR'S INFINITE MONEY GLITCH IS DOMINATING People don't understand how POWERFUL STRC is, and how much WEALTH will flow into Bitcoin because of it. You will learn: How STRC is the best fixed income instrument in the world How STRC is a perpetual capital transmutation engine. How Saylor is turning your yield addiction into Bitcoin fuel Why this structure is mathematically safer than government bonds How STRC functions as a shadow central bank with an incorruptible balance sheet And why nobody in power is stopping it... because they still don’t understand it STRC is the FINAL FORM of CAPITAL MARKETS WARFARE

Adam Livingston

22,376 views • 7 months ago

"If you short STRC at $100 your downside is capped because Strategy will come in and run the ATM right at $100. But your upside as a short is unlimited" Parker White on why STRC became a perfect short setup and why the violent selloff was shorts latching onto an opportunity rather than a fundamental problem "SATA did not have nearly as violent of a reaction. And Strive actually has a more vulnerable balance sheet position than Strategy with STRC. Yet the market was trading down for STRC" "This really was just a situation of shorts latching on to an opportunity and then people panicking, grabbing hold of a narrative, and selling"
1:46

"If you short STRC at $100 your downside is capped because Strategy will come in and run the ATM right at $100. But your upside as a short is unlimited" Parker White on why STRC became a perfect short setup and why the violent selloff was shorts latching onto an opportunity rather than a fundamental problem "SATA did not have nearly as violent of a reaction. And Strive actually has a more vulnerable balance sheet position than Strategy with STRC. Yet the market was trading down for STRC" "This really was just a situation of shorts latching on to an opportunity and then people panicking, grabbing hold of a narrative, and selling"

Laura Shin

97,231 views • 1 month ago

Is Saylor selling Bitcoin low only to buy it back higher with STRC? "Clearly selling Bitcoin is not a problem, and the fact that he's not buying is seemingly not a problem for the market either. But the thing I'm wondering now, and this remains open ended, is now that he's selling Bitcoin to buy STRC, what happens when STRC inevitably gets back to a hundred bucks and the old machine of using STRC to buy Bitcoin kicks back into motion?" "Are they actually going to be selling STRC to buy Bitcoin back at a higher price? Are we selling the lows on Bitcoin after buying the highs, only to buy that Bitcoin back higher with the very same instrument he's buying back? I'd say Michael Saylor here is in a bit of a pickle" "Having this not be the main narrative for crypto at the moment is really good news. Michael Saylor spent years turning dollars into Bitcoin. Now he's discovered there's a reverse button, and I don't love it"
0:59

Is Saylor selling Bitcoin low only to buy it back higher with STRC? "Clearly selling Bitcoin is not a problem, and the fact that he's not buying is seemingly not a problem for the market either. But the thing I'm wondering now, and this remains open ended, is now that he's selling Bitcoin to buy STRC, what happens when STRC inevitably gets back to a hundred bucks and the old machine of using STRC to buy Bitcoin kicks back into motion?" "Are they actually going to be selling STRC to buy Bitcoin back at a higher price? Are we selling the lows on Bitcoin after buying the highs, only to buy that Bitcoin back higher with the very same instrument he's buying back? I'd say Michael Saylor here is in a bit of a pickle" "Having this not be the main narrative for crypto at the moment is really good news. Michael Saylor spent years turning dollars into Bitcoin. Now he's discovered there's a reverse button, and I don't love it"

The Wolf Of All Streets

36,187 views • 5 days ago

Strive $ASST's last update is a lot bigger than people think. They didn't just boost $SATA. They didn't just buy more Bitcoin. They put $50M of Strategy's $STRC on the balance sheet. That’s the signal. $STRC is starting to look like the core trade. 00:00 Strive News: SATA Dividend Hike, STRC Buy & More Bitcoin 02:03 SATA dividend raised to 12.75% — why it happened 02:28 Why the tighter range could improve investor confidence 03:47 No SATA sales below $100 — what it means 04:54 Why SATA could move back toward par 07:15 A new balance sheet model for Bitcoin treasury companies 11:11 Why Strategy probably won’t buy SATA 12:19 Why digital credit could spread to global corporations 17:12 Why corporate STRC adoption changes the game 17:52 Final thoughts: Will SATA hit $100 soon? Watch the full episode 👇
19:12

Strive $ASST's last update is a lot bigger than people think. They didn't just boost $SATA. They didn't just buy more Bitcoin. They put $50M of Strategy's $STRC on the balance sheet. That’s the signal. $STRC is starting to look like the core trade. 00:00 Strive News: SATA Dividend Hike, STRC Buy & More Bitcoin 02:03 SATA dividend raised to 12.75% — why it happened 02:28 Why the tighter range could improve investor confidence 03:47 No SATA sales below $100 — what it means 04:54 Why SATA could move back toward par 07:15 A new balance sheet model for Bitcoin treasury companies 11:11 Why Strategy probably won’t buy SATA 12:19 Why digital credit could spread to global corporations 17:12 Why corporate STRC adoption changes the game 17:52 Final thoughts: Will SATA hit $100 soon? Watch the full episode 👇

One Chair

19,737 views • 5 months ago

🩸 THE BIGGEST BITCOIN TREASURY ON EARTH IS UNWINDING IN REAL TIME. Strategy is down 84% from its high. Tens of billions in market value gone. Its preferred stock $STRC was built to hold a $100 peg. It just broke to $75. Here is why this matters to all of Bitcoin. $MSTR did not just buy Bitcoin. It borrowed to buy Bitcoin. That structure is a rocket when price rises. And a trap when price falls. bitcoin:native is down 52% and the trap is closing. This is the leverage washing out of the entire market.
0:25

🩸 THE BIGGEST BITCOIN TREASURY ON EARTH IS UNWINDING IN REAL TIME. Strategy is down 84% from its high. Tens of billions in market value gone. Its preferred stock $STRC was built to hold a $100 peg. It just broke to $75. Here is why this matters to all of Bitcoin. $MSTR did not just buy Bitcoin. It borrowed to buy Bitcoin. That structure is a rocket when price rises. And a trap when price falls. bitcoin:native is down 52% and the trap is closing. This is the leverage washing out of the entire market.

Mister Crypto

16,950 views • 1 month ago

No, Apyx is not levered $STRC. No, this is not "Luna 2.0". And no, the team is not blindly dumping cash into the market while leaving long-term holders concentrated in $STRC. In Apyx Office Hours #12, we addressed the biggest questions around $STRC volatility, the $apxUSD discount, redemption mechanics, and how the protocol is being managed through stress. A few key points: 🔴 Apyx is designed to avoid bank-run dynamics. Instant NAV redemptions during stress would force the protocol to dump massive amounts of $STRC into a thin, falling order book. 🔴 The team is maintaining a homogeneous asset mix by selling $STRC alongside redemptions, not just spending cash and leaving remaining holders with increased concentration risk. 🔴 Apyx is the largest holder of $STRC, meaning we have a strong incentive to manage liquidity responsibly. 🔴 When $apxUSD is bought back at a discount, that discount can flow back into the protocol as additional overcollateralization, potentially leaving the protocol stronger after volatility subsides. 🔴 The long-term goal remains 10% overcollateralization, a level where events like this become significantly easier to absorb. 🔴 $STRCx, tokenized $STRC, is part of a broader vision for fully onchain reserve management, greater transparency, and eventually 24/7 liquidity. Timestamps: • 02:51 Why STRC sold off and what triggered the volatility • 05:37 What happens inside Apyx when STRC trades below par • 07:36 Why instant NAV redemptions could damage both STRC and Apyx • 09:29 Why the team slows redemptions instead of force-selling reserves • 09:56 How discounted buybacks increase overcollateralization • 10:56 The path toward 10% overcollateralization • 14:39 Exit options for apxUSD holders • 17:22 Why Apyx is not levered STRC • 17:50 SATA rotation and reserve management • 19:12 Apyx vs STRCx and other STRC-related products • 22:23 Balance sheet management during stress • 24:22 Why Apyx is designed to be anti-bank-run • 27:31 Saylor's options to stabilize STRC • 33:58 Why Apyx tokenized reserves through STRCx • 36:10 The vision for fully onchain financial infrastructure Full replay below. 👇
40:50

No, Apyx is not levered $STRC. No, this is not "Luna 2.0". And no, the team is not blindly dumping cash into the market while leaving long-term holders concentrated in $STRC. In Apyx Office Hours #12, we addressed the biggest questions around $STRC volatility, the $apxUSD discount, redemption mechanics, and how the protocol is being managed through stress. A few key points: 🔴 Apyx is designed to avoid bank-run dynamics. Instant NAV redemptions during stress would force the protocol to dump massive amounts of $STRC into a thin, falling order book. 🔴 The team is maintaining a homogeneous asset mix by selling $STRC alongside redemptions, not just spending cash and leaving remaining holders with increased concentration risk. 🔴 Apyx is the largest holder of $STRC, meaning we have a strong incentive to manage liquidity responsibly. 🔴 When $apxUSD is bought back at a discount, that discount can flow back into the protocol as additional overcollateralization, potentially leaving the protocol stronger after volatility subsides. 🔴 The long-term goal remains 10% overcollateralization, a level where events like this become significantly easier to absorb. 🔴 $STRCx, tokenized $STRC, is part of a broader vision for fully onchain reserve management, greater transparency, and eventually 24/7 liquidity. Timestamps: • 02:51 Why STRC sold off and what triggered the volatility • 05:37 What happens inside Apyx when STRC trades below par • 07:36 Why instant NAV redemptions could damage both STRC and Apyx • 09:29 Why the team slows redemptions instead of force-selling reserves • 09:56 How discounted buybacks increase overcollateralization • 10:56 The path toward 10% overcollateralization • 14:39 Exit options for apxUSD holders • 17:22 Why Apyx is not levered STRC • 17:50 SATA rotation and reserve management • 19:12 Apyx vs STRCx and other STRC-related products • 22:23 Balance sheet management during stress • 24:22 Why Apyx is designed to be anti-bank-run • 27:31 Saylor's options to stabilize STRC • 33:58 Why Apyx tokenized reserves through STRCx • 36:10 The vision for fully onchain financial infrastructure Full replay below. 👇

Apyx

30,835 views • 2 months ago

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.
0:42

“There was never any talk of the risk.” Peter Schiff is just lying at this point. The risk of $STRC was always obvious: it is preferred equity issued by a Bitcoin Treasury Company. Saylor said it clearly: if Bitcoin goes down long term or forever, that is the risk. And what are we seeing now? Bitcoin under pressure. Liquidity rotated into AI and IPOs. Maximum fear. STRC down. That is not some hidden scandal. That is risk premium repricing. Strategy does not magically control STRC’s market price. They can adjust the dividend rate, but the market prices the risk of Bitcoin and Strategy’s ability to keep paying dividends. And when Bitcoin starts going up again, what do you think happens? The same risk premium reprices in the other direction. If you buy preferred equity in a Bitcoin company, you are making one core assumption: Bitcoin goes up over the long term. That was never hidden.

Alex 👽

21,172 views • 1 month ago

STRC bi-monthly dividend & Institutional Signal - The market wants a high yield money market, something different than any equity or fixed income instrument that exists today. - This only works because Bitcoin is a closed system. - Phong Le: “We think one of the big opportunities of STRC is to borrow against it” - So long as STRC's market cap continues to grow, i.e. more buyers than sellers, there will exist an overnight arbitrage on the ex dividend date greater than the 11.5% annualized return of STRC. - This video scratches the surface of how STRC will price and what the liquidity will look like in a rising Bitcoin and STRC market cap environment.
10:59

STRC bi-monthly dividend & Institutional Signal - The market wants a high yield money market, something different than any equity or fixed income instrument that exists today. - This only works because Bitcoin is a closed system. - Phong Le: “We think one of the big opportunities of STRC is to borrow against it” - So long as STRC's market cap continues to grow, i.e. more buyers than sellers, there will exist an overnight arbitrage on the ex dividend date greater than the 11.5% annualized return of STRC. - This video scratches the surface of how STRC will price and what the liquidity will look like in a rising Bitcoin and STRC market cap environment.

Dan Hillery

35,213 views • 3 months ago

$MSTR How does Strategy defend the peg on $STRC if a large seller were to dump? The answer was remarkably simple. The instrument defends itself. That is the design. If you want the best takeaway from today’s call, it’s probably Michael Saylor explaining the mechanics of defending $STRC in the video below. It’s something I had thought about often. But it is incredible how Saylor manages to simplify it and make it make complete sense. As long as Strategy maintains its consistency and its focus on $STRC as its flagship product, the instrument remains remarkably stable. And the reason is the relationships and the pools of capital that surround it. If a large seller pulls $STRC below the peg on any given day, that creates an opportunity for a hedge fund to step in and capture the move back up, knowing Strategy will deploy its resources to restore it. And all of this happens while retail interest continues to pour in from buyers who are not here to hedge. Every large seller is met with another buyer who sees value. The capital base only grows wider over time. This should tell Strategy investors exactly why the company has placed $STRC at the front of everything it does. It now understands just how rigid and stable this instrument is built to be. The more you understand the design, the harder it is to bet against it. $BTC $MSTR $STRC
2:50

$MSTR How does Strategy defend the peg on $STRC if a large seller were to dump? The answer was remarkably simple. The instrument defends itself. That is the design. If you want the best takeaway from today’s call, it’s probably Michael Saylor explaining the mechanics of defending $STRC in the video below. It’s something I had thought about often. But it is incredible how Saylor manages to simplify it and make it make complete sense. As long as Strategy maintains its consistency and its focus on $STRC as its flagship product, the instrument remains remarkably stable. And the reason is the relationships and the pools of capital that surround it. If a large seller pulls $STRC below the peg on any given day, that creates an opportunity for a hedge fund to step in and capture the move back up, knowing Strategy will deploy its resources to restore it. And all of this happens while retail interest continues to pour in from buyers who are not here to hedge. Every large seller is met with another buyer who sees value. The capital base only grows wider over time. This should tell Strategy investors exactly why the company has placed $STRC at the front of everything it does. It now understands just how rigid and stable this instrument is built to be. The more you understand the design, the harder it is to bet against it. $BTC $MSTR $STRC

Zaid 🟧

27,390 views • 2 months ago

Coffeezilla thinks that $STRC is going to fail because it's 11.5% yield is "Too good to be true" comparing it to the Terra Luna moment and described it as a "Ponzi Scheme". There's absolutely no substance to his claims because he doesn't understand it. He sees the headline interest return and then compares it to every other high yield return product but spectacularly misses the fact that this product is nothing like them. Saylor recently did an interview with Bankless and mentioned there were '3 types of people in the world - Optimists, Pessimists & Alarmists". Coffeezilla in this instance is an alarmist. He says that Strategy are 'not obligated to pay you the yield'. Correct....but it's clearly not in their interest to not pay the divided, so why would they not? As Saylor correctly says: "You need to have a stochastic view of the world. We could list 100 things that could go wrong, but the real threat is you get hit by a truck because you're not looking both ways while you cross the street." $STRC is the real deal. Anyone who has watched it closely over the past 8+ months will tell you that.
2:58

Coffeezilla thinks that $STRC is going to fail because it's 11.5% yield is "Too good to be true" comparing it to the Terra Luna moment and described it as a "Ponzi Scheme". There's absolutely no substance to his claims because he doesn't understand it. He sees the headline interest return and then compares it to every other high yield return product but spectacularly misses the fact that this product is nothing like them. Saylor recently did an interview with Bankless and mentioned there were '3 types of people in the world - Optimists, Pessimists & Alarmists". Coffeezilla in this instance is an alarmist. He says that Strategy are 'not obligated to pay you the yield'. Correct....but it's clearly not in their interest to not pay the divided, so why would they not? As Saylor correctly says: "You need to have a stochastic view of the world. We could list 100 things that could go wrong, but the real threat is you get hit by a truck because you're not looking both ways while you cross the street." $STRC is the real deal. Anyone who has watched it closely over the past 8+ months will tell you that.

David Lawrence

39,873 views • 4 months ago

Literally my whole timeline is about Michael Saylor selling 32 BTC, which leaves them with JUST 843,706. What I do find interesting is the reasoning behind selling 32 BTC. And let me tell you what I think the reason is: $MSTR is so focused on $STRC lately, and a lot of the noise comes from people thinking they won't pay their holders the dividend. Saylor posted his "Working Better" post and the next few posts were about $STRC. First about maintaining the dividend rate at 11.50%. The second post "Our goal is to make $STRC the best credit instrument in the world." Strategy isn't panic selling Bitcoin because they're about to go down. They're selling to reassure STRC holders that Strategy WILL pay you the dividend. Panic over 0.004% of holdings is peak noise. They're paying STRC holders what they promised so the capital machine keeps fueling more Bitcoin.
2:28

Literally my whole timeline is about Michael Saylor selling 32 BTC, which leaves them with JUST 843,706. What I do find interesting is the reasoning behind selling 32 BTC. And let me tell you what I think the reason is: $MSTR is so focused on $STRC lately, and a lot of the noise comes from people thinking they won't pay their holders the dividend. Saylor posted his "Working Better" post and the next few posts were about $STRC. First about maintaining the dividend rate at 11.50%. The second post "Our goal is to make $STRC the best credit instrument in the world." Strategy isn't panic selling Bitcoin because they're about to go down. They're selling to reassure STRC holders that Strategy WILL pay you the dividend. Panic over 0.004% of holdings is peak noise. They're paying STRC holders what they promised so the capital machine keeps fueling more Bitcoin.

Marc ₿

143,210 views • 2 months ago

JUST IN: Coffeezilla publishes video taking on Bitcoin believer Michael Saylor & Strategy's $STRC. Coffee says Saylor's STRC preferred-stock pitch is too simple & the risks are not properly explained. "It's been compared to the iPhone. It's been compared to a Ponzi scheme." "You put in your money. They say they're going to yield about 11.5% per year. That's basically double digit returns which is just mind-blowing" "What is the problem with that? Well ultimately... the company has no obligation to pay you back. Why haven't people realized this?" "My entire problem is that they're leading people like a pied piper with this kind of ludicrous idea. Their pitch is of a money market and a bank - When that's just not what this is. This is a snowball of yield."
4:39

JUST IN: Coffeezilla publishes video taking on Bitcoin believer Michael Saylor & Strategy's $STRC. Coffee says Saylor's STRC preferred-stock pitch is too simple & the risks are not properly explained. "It's been compared to the iPhone. It's been compared to a Ponzi scheme." "You put in your money. They say they're going to yield about 11.5% per year. That's basically double digit returns which is just mind-blowing" "What is the problem with that? Well ultimately... the company has no obligation to pay you back. Why haven't people realized this?" "My entire problem is that they're leading people like a pied piper with this kind of ludicrous idea. Their pitch is of a money market and a bank - When that's just not what this is. This is a snowball of yield."

Altcoin Daily

424,048 views • 4 months ago

🔥Strategy's STRC is the FIXED INCOME KILLER APP🔥 11% dividends on an annualized basis. PAID MONTHLY. This SMOKES every other traditional fixed income product. And the dividends are ROC, which means they are TAX-DEFERRED. These are NOT taxed as income. Every “safe yield” product in America is the same movie with different actors: You hand them dollars They hand you a coupon Inflation quietly eats the principal You clap because the number went up STRC is a different animal. STRC is what happens when fixed income stops pretending the denominator is stable. Traditional fixed income = yield paid from a system that’s structurally losing purchasing power. STRC = yield funded by a balance sheet that’s actively compounding a harder asset. So yeah, the headline yield matters (11% variable, paid monthly). But the real edge is that your “coverage” isn’t coming from hope, it’s coming from Bitcoin reserves + capital markets machinery. Compare the usual “popular” choices: T-Bills: “Congrats on matching the Fed… until the cuts.” IG corporates: “Enjoy the spread… until credit risk wakes up.” High yield: “You’re underwriting zombies for a few extra points.” Munis: “Great if you’re high bracket… still capped by fiat math.” CDs: “Locked up for a rate you’ll hate in 6 months.” Preferred ETFs: “Equity risk cosplay with bond marketing.” Money markets: “Cash that thinks it’s investing.” STRC is basically: “Here’s a real coupon, and the issuer is playing offense with the treasury instead of praying the CPI gods behave.” Fixed income has been a retirement home for capital. STRC is fixed income with teeth. Not financial advice. I’m just saying the bond market is getting dunked on by a ticker that acts like a money printer stapled to a war chest. $10,000 into STRC vs. traditional fixed income after 20 years: Strategy STRC (11%): $80,623 3-M T-Bill: $20,483 10-Yr Treasury: $22,726 IG Corporate: $25,638 High-Yield Corp: $35,236 AAA Muni: $17,372 Series I Bond: $22,038 1-Yr CD: $22,336 Preferred ETF: $34,386 Gov MMF: $20,208 Fixed income built on Bitcoin is THE FUTURE.
0:20

🔥Strategy's STRC is the FIXED INCOME KILLER APP🔥 11% dividends on an annualized basis. PAID MONTHLY. This SMOKES every other traditional fixed income product. And the dividends are ROC, which means they are TAX-DEFERRED. These are NOT taxed as income. Every “safe yield” product in America is the same movie with different actors: You hand them dollars They hand you a coupon Inflation quietly eats the principal You clap because the number went up STRC is a different animal. STRC is what happens when fixed income stops pretending the denominator is stable. Traditional fixed income = yield paid from a system that’s structurally losing purchasing power. STRC = yield funded by a balance sheet that’s actively compounding a harder asset. So yeah, the headline yield matters (11% variable, paid monthly). But the real edge is that your “coverage” isn’t coming from hope, it’s coming from Bitcoin reserves + capital markets machinery. Compare the usual “popular” choices: T-Bills: “Congrats on matching the Fed… until the cuts.” IG corporates: “Enjoy the spread… until credit risk wakes up.” High yield: “You’re underwriting zombies for a few extra points.” Munis: “Great if you’re high bracket… still capped by fiat math.” CDs: “Locked up for a rate you’ll hate in 6 months.” Preferred ETFs: “Equity risk cosplay with bond marketing.” Money markets: “Cash that thinks it’s investing.” STRC is basically: “Here’s a real coupon, and the issuer is playing offense with the treasury instead of praying the CPI gods behave.” Fixed income has been a retirement home for capital. STRC is fixed income with teeth. Not financial advice. I’m just saying the bond market is getting dunked on by a ticker that acts like a money printer stapled to a war chest. $10,000 into STRC vs. traditional fixed income after 20 years: Strategy STRC (11%): $80,623 3-M T-Bill: $20,483 10-Yr Treasury: $22,726 IG Corporate: $25,638 High-Yield Corp: $35,236 AAA Muni: $17,372 Series I Bond: $22,038 1-Yr CD: $22,336 Preferred ETF: $34,386 Gov MMF: $20,208 Fixed income built on Bitcoin is THE FUTURE.

Adam Livingston

61,147 views • 7 months ago

"He cannot repeg this to $100. I will bet anyone this almost never gets to $100 ever again" Vinny Lingham on why STRC is broken and every move Saylor makes from here is a losing move "The market is speaking. STRC needs to trade at a 20% discount to give a 14.5% effective yield. The damage has been done" "There is a chess move for this. It is called zugzwang. Every move you make is a losing move"
0:46

"He cannot repeg this to $100. I will bet anyone this almost never gets to $100 ever again" Vinny Lingham on why STRC is broken and every move Saylor makes from here is a losing move "The market is speaking. STRC needs to trade at a 20% discount to give a 14.5% effective yield. The damage has been done" "There is a chess move for this. It is called zugzwang. Every move you make is a losing move"

Laura Shin

154,281 views • 1 month ago

The Q&A got really interesting when someone asked: “What happens if a huge leveraged unwind dumps billions of STRC onto the market?” Saylor’s answer was basically: That’s literally what the instrument was designed for. He said if STRC trades down 50-100 basis points, billions of dollars of capital are incentivized to step in and buy it back toward par. “If you push the ship down, there’s more force pushing it up.” Most people still think this is a normal preferred stock. They’re engineering an entire digital credit system around Bitcoin.
5:22

The Q&A got really interesting when someone asked: “What happens if a huge leveraged unwind dumps billions of STRC onto the market?” Saylor’s answer was basically: That’s literally what the instrument was designed for. He said if STRC trades down 50-100 basis points, billions of dollars of capital are incentivized to step in and buy it back toward par. “If you push the ship down, there’s more force pushing it up.” Most people still think this is a normal preferred stock. They’re engineering an entire digital credit system around Bitcoin.

Alex 👽

66,763 views • 2 months ago

🚨 THE CRASH IS NOT STOPPING AND MICHAEL SAYLOR IS NOW IN REAL TROUBLE. Bitcoin just crashed nearly -5% in 30 minutes. $BTC hit a NEW 21-MONTH LOW. $STRC collapsed to a NEW ALL-TIME LOW. $MSTR is already down over -83% from its peaK. Read that again. Bitcoin is breaking down. STRC is breaking down. MSTR is breaking down. All at the same time. This is no longer just a crypto dump. This is the market starting to ask the question nobody wanted to ask: Could Strategy eventually be forced to sell Bitcoin? Because if liquidity keeps disappearing… Saylor’s Bitcoin empire becomes the next domino. Keep in mind: I’ve called every major market top and bottom for over 10 YEARS. I was one of the only people who called the top in October, and I’ll do it again, that’s literally my job. If you still haven’t followed me, you’ll regret it.
0:35

🚨 THE CRASH IS NOT STOPPING AND MICHAEL SAYLOR IS NOW IN REAL TROUBLE. Bitcoin just crashed nearly -5% in 30 minutes. $BTC hit a NEW 21-MONTH LOW. $STRC collapsed to a NEW ALL-TIME LOW. $MSTR is already down over -83% from its peaK. Read that again. Bitcoin is breaking down. STRC is breaking down. MSTR is breaking down. All at the same time. This is no longer just a crypto dump. This is the market starting to ask the question nobody wanted to ask: Could Strategy eventually be forced to sell Bitcoin? Because if liquidity keeps disappearing… Saylor’s Bitcoin empire becomes the next domino. Keep in mind: I’ve called every major market top and bottom for over 10 YEARS. I was one of the only people who called the top in October, and I’ll do it again, that’s literally my job. If you still haven’t followed me, you’ll regret it.

DANNY

120,212 views • 1 month ago

AMAZING NEW BITCOIN INCOME METHOD: SATA+STRC FOR BI-WEEKLY PAYCHECK NOT TO MENTION A CASUAL 40% return on your SATA position this year. STRC is the stable one. SATA is the unhinged overachiever. Together they produce more consistent income than most American employers, and the payout schedule might actually be more reliable. I dig into how SATA’s $80 IPO price lets you harvest a fifteen percent yield on cost before your coffee finishes brewing, why STRC behaves like it’s been microdosed with Xanax, and how holding both basically gives you a strategy that pays twice a month without turning your portfolio into a cry-for-help. FYI I'm not affiliated with either company and this is not financial advice... this is just the scenario that will play out if Strive increases dividend until it reaches par.
15:34

AMAZING NEW BITCOIN INCOME METHOD: SATA+STRC FOR BI-WEEKLY PAYCHECK NOT TO MENTION A CASUAL 40% return on your SATA position this year. STRC is the stable one. SATA is the unhinged overachiever. Together they produce more consistent income than most American employers, and the payout schedule might actually be more reliable. I dig into how SATA’s $80 IPO price lets you harvest a fifteen percent yield on cost before your coffee finishes brewing, why STRC behaves like it’s been microdosed with Xanax, and how holding both basically gives you a strategy that pays twice a month without turning your portfolio into a cry-for-help. FYI I'm not affiliated with either company and this is not financial advice... this is just the scenario that will play out if Strive increases dividend until it reaches par.

Adam Livingston

102,396 views • 9 months ago

"I bought STRC around $92 and Bitcoin at $60,000 because it seemed like the most obvious counter trade in history" "Saylor sold 32 Bitcoin at $77K, the market was so spooked it dumped below 60,000. He not only inoculated the market to the idea of him selling, but was able to scoop up $101 million worth of Bitcoin much cheaper at $65K" "STRC was trading down to $91 and at the open today it skyrocketed over 3%. People are realizing maybe they panicked too much, and STRC will likely trade back to par at 100" "You can buy something designed to go back to par at 100 for $91, $92, $93, and unless you believe it's going to zero, you're probably going to get that 7, 8, 9% boost and then the 11.5% dividend on top. Not telling you what to do, telling you what I did"
1:30

"I bought STRC around $92 and Bitcoin at $60,000 because it seemed like the most obvious counter trade in history" "Saylor sold 32 Bitcoin at $77K, the market was so spooked it dumped below 60,000. He not only inoculated the market to the idea of him selling, but was able to scoop up $101 million worth of Bitcoin much cheaper at $65K" "STRC was trading down to $91 and at the open today it skyrocketed over 3%. People are realizing maybe they panicked too much, and STRC will likely trade back to par at 100" "You can buy something designed to go back to par at 100 for $91, $92, $93, and unless you believe it's going to zero, you're probably going to get that 7, 8, 9% boost and then the 11.5% dividend on top. Not telling you what to do, telling you what I did"

The Wolf Of All Streets

102,503 views • 2 months ago

Quick thought I have from the Strategy Earnings Call: I found it refreshing that while discussing $STRC Phong Le said: "...we found that increasing the stretch rate is not really an effective way to bring it back to par..." This is what investors do not want to accept, much of the noise around $STRC | $SATA come down to divident rate and/or the frequency. However I have an updated analysis that shows it's neither the rate nor the frequency that's driving price action on the prefs. I've shared my initial analysis below, but this is the key concept I want to draw attention to: "One of the points that I have been raising with these preferred offerings is that dividend frequency can mitigate the trading dynamics, but they do not erase the broader market $BTC transmission channel. This is not a criticism of either instrument, it is the structural reality."
0:33

Quick thought I have from the Strategy Earnings Call: I found it refreshing that while discussing $STRC Phong Le said: "...we found that increasing the stretch rate is not really an effective way to bring it back to par..." This is what investors do not want to accept, much of the noise around $STRC | $SATA come down to divident rate and/or the frequency. However I have an updated analysis that shows it's neither the rate nor the frequency that's driving price action on the prefs. I've shared my initial analysis below, but this is the key concept I want to draw attention to: "One of the points that I have been raising with these preferred offerings is that dividend frequency can mitigate the trading dynamics, but they do not erase the broader market $BTC transmission channel. This is not a criticism of either instrument, it is the structural reality."

Adrian Morris

24,185 views • 14 days ago