正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Everyone thinks the Fed prints endless money. So why does the world keep running short of dollars? Because what the Fed actually creates is not the money the world uses. It creates bank reserves. Those are not real money. They are limited-use tokens that only work inside the interbank...

62,354 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

29 条评论

Central ₿ank Robber 的头像
Central ₿ank Robber2 个月前

Printing money and giving it to banks so they could pad their reserves was inflationary, because it meant banks didn't need to liquidate assets, e.g. delinquent property, to stay solvent. Therefore it locked it prior inflation from previous credit expansion.

SmedleyButlerUSMC 的头像
SmedleyButlerUSMC2 个月前

Yep but Central Banks have the power to *indirectly* *direct* lending - so it does in fact have something to do with the Fed See world renowned economist credited with the creation of QE, Dr. Richard Werner's book "Princes of The Yen" where he documents exactly this dynamic.

Billy Bishop 的头像
Billy Bishop2 个月前

The Fed converted reserves into deposits in 2020's QE by buying assets from non-banks in a pass through scheme with its member banks. Suggested to them by who else but the evil little Fink Fairy who rested on Powell's shoulder at Jackson Hole in 2019.

Steve Kramer 的头像
Steve Kramer2 个月前

The Federal Reserve and its member banks have always been the beneficiaries of our financial system. American citizens get the leftovers.

Sirius Professor (Why so Sirius?) 的头像
Sirius Professor (Why so Sirius?)2 个月前

In layman's terms it's known as Financialization. Splitting the ECONOMY into two economies, with the general economy being actual production and financialization being the economy of paper. It's why everything is measured now by stock prices, and not actual production.

antibubble 的头像
antibubble2 个月前

Snyder has the facts completely backwards. Dollar shortage is when nobody wants to buy (with reserves) the assets (stocks , bonds) for sale. Right now, Qatar wants to liquidate USG bonds to get reserves to buy food or whatever. Hence Fed swap lines to stop fire sale.og USG bonds

Steve Cuskley 的头像
Steve Cuskley2 个月前

Jeff, Ya gotta explain how this works in simple terms for the uninitiated. It creates bank reserves. Those are not real money. They are limited-use tokens that only work inside the interbank system.

Danny Z 的头像
Danny Z2 个月前

But the stock market will go even higher.

EleventySigma CygnusAtratus 的头像
EleventySigma CygnusAtratus2 个月前

I was just comparing the current over allocation of capital by private credit to AI to a similar over allocation by trust companies to railroads prior to 1907. We'll see how it plays out this time around.

pieterdejong 🏴‍☠️ 的头像
pieterdejong 🏴‍☠️2 个月前

Don’t forget to mention government deficits.

Mike Rudinsky 的头像
Mike Rudinsky2 个月前

That is why the term "Banksters" applies. It is a system that includes the FED, the larger banks that are both part of the larger system but profit from it from each transaction. They are the epitomy of the Cantillon Effect.

Donjimmy 的头像
Donjimmy2 个月前

Jeffs followers all owned treasuries before they got cut in half 🤣

david reutter 的头像
david reutter2 个月前

there are a ton of sterilized dollars, and the Fed creates credit EFFR policy guidance and interest rates equals REPO. then the great offshoring of dollars in 2008. print dollars to replace the missing dollars, you have more dollars. dollars obviously copped off a bad loan(s)

Lame Ahh Owl 的头像
Lame Ahh Owl2 个月前

The money system is more than just endogenous money. The Fed is just an agent of Treasury.

David O 的头像
David O2 个月前

This is the bit that bitcoiners struggle with. Central bank digital currency has very serious implications if you remove or bypass the natural restraint of commercial banks.

Daniel 的头像
Daniel2 个月前

No. The fed prints currency as it takes treasury as collateral.

CapitianMarion 的头像
CapitianMarion2 个月前

But issuance of federal debt does create something that can be use the same as money and a bank can buy it with bank reserves right????

C aa C 的头像
C aa C2 个月前

@xclugny @BrunoBertez C'est ce que disait à partir de 2011 Jacques Généreux, le conseiller économique du Parti de Gauche de Mélenchon à l'époque. Dommage que merluche a abandonné son combat contre la finance apatride des Suprêmes Roublards pour bifurquer vers leur escrologie

Jeffrey P. Snider 的头像
Jeffrey P. Snider2 个月前

If you want to see The Four Economic Regimes, and How to Position Your Portfolio for Each One, sign up here 👇

JedoBako 的头像
JedoBako2 个月前

This same thing happened during the Sovereign debt crisis in Europe in 2011. You can flood banks w/ liquidity but if the underlying economy is in shambles the banks aren't necessarily going to just start lending. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink

Solonechope 的头像
Solonechope2 个月前

Been there before

MeatBot9000 的头像
MeatBot90002 个月前

Ponzi shell game of counterfeiting and calling it "monetary policy".

Sansjuden 的头像
Sansjuden2 个月前

The more reserves they create out of perpetual debt machines created by governments, the more commercial banks have to lend against. The trick is where they buy toxic shit from banks 🏦 non performing loans NPLs and a smattering of other illiquid bad ideas that banks offload.

Carpathia Portfolio Consulting.AI enabled. 的头像
Carpathia Portfolio Consulting.AI enabled.2 个月前

What happened to you Jeff. You look homeless?

Sansjuden 的头像
Sansjuden2 个月前

It’s just fraud , stop Pretending it’s not you insufferable fucking academic drone.

Rudder Amidships 的头像
Rudder Amidships2 个月前

Inflation happens when too many dollars (or euros, etc.) chase too few goods and services. Nothing more; nothing less. We have inflation in the U.S. Ergo, there are more than enough dollars sloshing around the system. The end.

Andy Martin 的头像
Andy Martin2 个月前

Sounds like the only thing the Fed can pump up by this process is banks.

ForTheRepublic - "A republic, if you can keep it." 的头像
ForTheRepublic - "A republic, if you can keep it."2 个月前

@maneco1964

Marcus | Macro Strategist 的头像
Marcus | Macro Strategist2 个月前

Banks not lending is the problem, not reserves. duh. track your real assets.

相关视频

Most people read the dollar exactly backwards. A rising dollar looks like strength. Strong America, good economy, the Fed doing its job. A falling dollar looks like weakness. Inflation, debasement, the end of dollar dominance. It is the other way around. A rising dollar usually means global funding is tightening. The world is short of dollars and scrambling to find them. That is not strength. That is stress. Think of a hurricane coming and everyone rushing to buy bottled water. The price spikes. That does not mean the water got stronger. It means people are scared and desperate. The dollar works the same way. When it surges against everything at once, it is telling you dollars are getting scarce, not that America is winning. That is why the dollar spikes in crises. The 1997 Asian crisis. 2008. The 2015 emerging market squeeze. March 2020. The 2024 carry trade blow up. The pattern is not random. None of this is really about the Fed or money printing. The dollar's exchange value is mechanical. It runs on the eurodollar system, the offshore dollar funding made of bank balance sheets, collateral, repo, and swaps. The biggest driver is dealer balance sheets. When dealers expand, dollars flow and the world feels calm. When they pull back, dollars get scarce and the dollar climbs. And this is the part everyone gets wrong. When foreign central banks sell US treasuries, the headlines scream that they are dumping America. They are not. They are using their reserves exactly as designed. When their markets are short of dollars, they sell treasuries to supply them. Sell treasuries, the dollar goes up. That is stress, not rejection. Which is why the dollar doom story keeps failing. They said QE would destroy the dollar after 2008. They said the deficits would collapse it. It never happened, because the problem was never too many dollars. It was not enough usable ones in the right places. So when someone tells you a strong dollar means America is strong, be careful. The strongest looking dollar is often the biggest warning sign. And a falling dollar is usually just the storm passing.

Jeffrey P. Snider

103,944 次观看 • 3 个月前

Something strange is happening in markets, and almost nobody is watching it. US stocks are surging. Tech is euphoric. Semiconductors are going vertical. The party is back on. Except in Hong Kong. The Hang Seng is falling hard, going the opposite direction. That matters, because Hong Kong is the money gateway into China and across Asia. Money flows through it when people believe in China, when trade is strong, when dollars are easy. So ask the uncomfortable question. What is Hong Kong seeing that everyone else is ignoring? The answer is in China's credit markets. For new credit, bonds have now passed bank loans for the first time. About 30% of the credit stock in May, a record. The official spin is modernization. China moving from property to a high-tech, capital-markets future. It sounds reassuring. It is not. Here is what they leave out. Bank lending creates money. A loan makes a new deposit, new purchasing power, on the spot. Bond issuance does not. Someone buys the bond with savings that already exist. It just moves money around. So bonds can only cushion the fall. They cannot replace the credit that banks are no longer creating. And the banks are pulling back for a reason. A slow-motion credit crisis. As many as 100 million consumers struggling to service their debt. Bad household loans up 21% to a record 2.2 trillion yuan. Nearly 11% of adults behind on payments. Now ask who is issuing all these bonds. Not companies expanding. The government, borrowing to paper over the gap. That is not modernization. Heavy government issuance means the private sector is too scared to borrow, so the state steps in. That is desperation. We have seen this movie. Post-2008 US and Europe. Banks retreated, bonds backstopped, and the economy got the silent depression anyway. That is what Hong Kong is pricing. Not a recovery. Bonds are not the sign China solved its problems. They are the sign the banks can no longer carry them.

Jeffrey P. Snider

30,043 次观看 • 3 个月前