Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Everyone wants the perfect breakout. Few understand when to avoid one entirely. The best traders know when not to trade. Pradeep Bonde stresses that situational awareness is critical. It helps you avoid drawdowns and frustration, making capital preservation the key focus when context isn't right. Context matters more than setup.

TraderLion

227,951 subscribers

16,370 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Everyone wants to trade hot stocks. Pradeep Bonde looks for neglected ones. His classic Episodic Pivot (EP) setup targets stocks with a clear catalyst that causes a massive gap. He filters for "Magna 53 Cap 10x 10" to ensure the right conditions for an explosive move. Unseen can mean unmatched potential.

Everyone wants to trade hot stocks. Pradeep Bonde looks for neglected ones. His classic Episodic Pivot (EP) setup targets stocks with a clear catalyst that causes a massive gap. He filters for "Magna 53 Cap 10x 10" to ensure the right conditions for an explosive move. Unseen can mean unmatched potential.

TraderLion

12,755 views • 1 month ago

The magic you're looking for is in the work you keep attempting to avoid When it comes to a better diet, hitting the gym, whatever it is... Just get started And focus on the "big boulders" (sleep, exercise, diet) You don't have to be perfect from the start Consistency is all that matters

The magic you're looking for is in the work you keep attempting to avoid When it comes to a better diet, hitting the gym, whatever it is... Just get started And focus on the "big boulders" (sleep, exercise, diet) You don't have to be perfect from the start Consistency is all that matters

FoundMyFitness Clips

23,070 views • 2 years ago

Everyone wants to buy the strongest stocks. Few understand how to use earnings gaps to spot true sector rotation. Shake Pryzby tracks post-earnings price action to see where institutional money is moving. When tech giants stall on good news while industrial and financial stocks gap up and hold their gains, he shifts his capital to the new leading sectors. Follow the institutional footprint.

Everyone wants to buy the strongest stocks. Few understand how to use earnings gaps to spot true sector rotation. Shake Pryzby tracks post-earnings price action to see where institutional money is moving. When tech giants stall on good news while industrial and financial stocks gap up and hold their gains, he shifts his capital to the new leading sectors. Follow the institutional footprint.

TraderLion

15,979 views • 18 days ago

The best trades don't make you sweat. That's not a feeling — it's a signal. Lance, a professional trend-following trader, makes the case that serious drawdown is diagnostic information, not bad luck. When a trade bleeds and doesn't recover quickly, it almost always means the position is structured against the dominant trend. The market delivers that verdict fast. Waiting it out rarely changes the answer. If the trade is giving heat, it's already telling you what you need to know.

The best trades don't make you sweat. That's not a feeling — it's a signal. Lance, a professional trend-following trader, makes the case that serious drawdown is diagnostic information, not bad luck. When a trade bleeds and doesn't recover quickly, it almost always means the position is structured against the dominant trend. The market delivers that verdict fast. Waiting it out rarely changes the answer. If the trade is giving heat, it's already telling you what you need to know.

TraderLion

12,261 views • 4 months ago

The best signal is sometimes NO signal. That is why I do not trade when Intelligent Balance shows less than 60%. Below 60% means one thing to me: NO CLEAR EDGE. And that is exactly where most traders destroy their account. They see a sweep. They see an iFVG. They see CISD. They convince themselves there is a trade. But without a strong more probable side, the setup has no real filter. For me: 60%+ = I have a side to focus on. Below 60% = I protect capital. Simple. Intelligent Balance is not only there to tell me where to trade. It is there to tell me when NOT to trade. Because forcing trades in a low-edge environment is not trading. It is gambling with extra steps. Would you skip a session if the indicator told you there is no clear edge?

The best signal is sometimes NO signal. That is why I do not trade when Intelligent Balance shows less than 60%. Below 60% means one thing to me: NO CLEAR EDGE. And that is exactly where most traders destroy their account. They see a sweep. They see an iFVG. They see CISD. They convince themselves there is a trade. But without a strong more probable side, the setup has no real filter. For me: 60%+ = I have a side to focus on. Below 60% = I protect capital. Simple. Intelligent Balance is not only there to tell me where to trade. It is there to tell me when NOT to trade. Because forcing trades in a low-edge environment is not trading. It is gambling with extra steps. Would you skip a session if the indicator told you there is no clear edge?

Herman Trading

19,182 views • 2 months ago

The market's been on fire the past couple days... But here's the truth: This is EXACTLY when most beginners blow up their accounts. Let us explain why: — When the market rallies hard off the bottom, and then everyone gets bullish (kinda like right now), beginning traders who don't have any exposure on FOMO into moves. Next thing you know, the market pulls back to test bulls' conviction, and everybody who chased is now down big... — The difference between these beginner traders and those who actually make a living trading is this: It's their ability to wait for HIGH PROBABILITY setups with CLEAR risk management. So before you go to buy anything over the next couple of days (and for the foreseeable future), ask yourself these questions: → Is the market truly healthy, or just bouncing? → Is this stock showing multiple edges? (RS phase, high volume, etc) → Can I identify a specific setup? (Base breakout, gapper, launch pad) → Is there a tight, logical stop loss? And more importantly, if you're really feeling FOMO right now, ask yourself: "If I could only take ONE trade this month, would it be this one?" This mental trick forces you to be selective and disciplined. Trading less = Trading better.

The market's been on fire the past couple days... But here's the truth: This is EXACTLY when most beginners blow up their accounts. Let us explain why: — When the market rallies hard off the bottom, and then everyone gets bullish (kinda like right now), beginning traders who don't have any exposure on FOMO into moves. Next thing you know, the market pulls back to test bulls' conviction, and everybody who chased is now down big... — The difference between these beginner traders and those who actually make a living trading is this: It's their ability to wait for HIGH PROBABILITY setups with CLEAR risk management. So before you go to buy anything over the next couple of days (and for the foreseeable future), ask yourself these questions: → Is the market truly healthy, or just bouncing? → Is this stock showing multiple edges? (RS phase, high volume, etc) → Can I identify a specific setup? (Base breakout, gapper, launch pad) → Is there a tight, logical stop loss? And more importantly, if you're really feeling FOMO right now, ask yourself: "If I could only take ONE trade this month, would it be this one?" This mental trick forces you to be selective and disciplined. Trading less = Trading better.

TraderLion

20,256 views • 1 year ago

Large losses are devastating — it doesn't matter if you're a beginner trader or one with 10+ years of performance under your belt. Yesterday, we uploaded one of the most in-depth guides to Risk Management on the internet. Here's what we cover: → 3 key levers that control risk: size, stops, & position count → Calculating open risk & protecting your portfolio during corrections → Why tight & logical stops are the foundation of professional trading → Real-world sizing rules for swing traders and position traders → How to survive gap-downs, control drawdowns, and avoid catastrophic losses If you’re building your system or trying to stay consistent in this market, this is the only video you should dedicate time to studying this week! 🦁

Large losses are devastating — it doesn't matter if you're a beginner trader or one with 10+ years of performance under your belt. Yesterday, we uploaded one of the most in-depth guides to Risk Management on the internet. Here's what we cover: → 3 key levers that control risk: size, stops, & position count → Calculating open risk & protecting your portfolio during corrections → Why tight & logical stops are the foundation of professional trading → Real-world sizing rules for swing traders and position traders → How to survive gap-downs, control drawdowns, and avoid catastrophic losses If you’re building your system or trying to stay consistent in this market, this is the only video you should dedicate time to studying this week! 🦁

TraderLion

38,124 views • 1 year ago

Everyone wants agent swarms. Very few people are talking seriously enough about the context layer that makes swarms useful. Even with one agent, context is fragile. Too little context and the agent guesses. Too much context and it wastes tokens, loses focus, or reasons over irrelevant noise. The sweet spot is precise context: the right knowledge, in the right structure, at the right moment. With many agents, that challenge explodes. Each agent produces decisions, assumptions, findings, summaries, risks, and partial conclusions. Unless that knowledge becomes shared, structured, and reusable, every new agent is forced to rediscover what another agent already learned. That is not a swarm. That is a crowd. Shared context graphs are what turn agent activity into agent collaboration, and OriginTrail DKG V10 brings them to life. Was just playing with some final polishing for the V10 release, and it is really powerful to see shared context graphs where multiple agents contribute knowledge into the same connected memory, with attribution visible directly in the graph ui. That matters for three reasons. First, agents can access and build on one shared memory instead of staying trapped in isolated sessions. Second, the graph structure helps them retrieve the exact context they need, instead of stuffing everything into a prompt and hoping the model sorts it out. Third, verifiability of provenance. You can see which agent contributed each piece of knowledge, trace the source, and decide what to trust. Tokenmaxxing starts with fewer tokens, but the deeper story is coordination - agents stop reloading the world and start building on shared, verifiable context. That is the foundation for serious multi-agent work across software engineering, research, finance, operations, project management, and far beyond. The future is not more agents, it is agents working from shared, verifiable context. But the more the merrier, of course.

Everyone wants agent swarms. Very few people are talking seriously enough about the context layer that makes swarms useful. Even with one agent, context is fragile. Too little context and the agent guesses. Too much context and it wastes tokens, loses focus, or reasons over irrelevant noise. The sweet spot is precise context: the right knowledge, in the right structure, at the right moment. With many agents, that challenge explodes. Each agent produces decisions, assumptions, findings, summaries, risks, and partial conclusions. Unless that knowledge becomes shared, structured, and reusable, every new agent is forced to rediscover what another agent already learned. That is not a swarm. That is a crowd. Shared context graphs are what turn agent activity into agent collaboration, and OriginTrail DKG V10 brings them to life. Was just playing with some final polishing for the V10 release, and it is really powerful to see shared context graphs where multiple agents contribute knowledge into the same connected memory, with attribution visible directly in the graph ui. That matters for three reasons. First, agents can access and build on one shared memory instead of staying trapped in isolated sessions. Second, the graph structure helps them retrieve the exact context they need, instead of stuffing everything into a prompt and hoping the model sorts it out. Third, verifiability of provenance. You can see which agent contributed each piece of knowledge, trace the source, and decide what to trust. Tokenmaxxing starts with fewer tokens, but the deeper story is coordination - agents stop reloading the world and start building on shared, verifiable context. That is the foundation for serious multi-agent work across software engineering, research, finance, operations, project management, and far beyond. The future is not more agents, it is agents working from shared, verifiable context. But the more the merrier, of course.

Jurij Skornik

11,180 views • 3 months ago

Moving averages are not support. They are math. Scot1and, a trader and educator who builds his entire framework around price and auction activity, breaks down why this distinction is critical. A moving average has no participants behind it. A price congestion zone does — real volume, real transactions, real memory baked into the chart. When those two things coincide and the moving average holds, traders credit the indicator when they should credit the zone. When they diverge, traders get hurt holding a level that was never real to begin with. Real support is where the market has already done business. That is the only line worth watching.

Moving averages are not support. They are math. Scot1and, a trader and educator who builds his entire framework around price and auction activity, breaks down why this distinction is critical. A moving average has no participants behind it. A price congestion zone does — real volume, real transactions, real memory baked into the chart. When those two things coincide and the moving average holds, traders credit the indicator when they should credit the zone. When they diverge, traders get hurt holding a level that was never real to begin with. Real support is where the market has already done business. That is the only line worth watching.

TraderLion

14,604 views • 4 months ago

When Lying Matters "I'm not suggesting that you lie. I'm suggesting that you know the difference between a time when the truth is absolutely the best way to go and when shading the truth gets you a better result." Scott Adams · Real Coffee Ep. 52 · Jun 16, 2018

When Lying Matters "I'm not suggesting that you lie. I'm suggesting that you know the difference between a time when the truth is absolutely the best way to go and when shading the truth gets you a better result." Scott Adams · Real Coffee Ep. 52 · Jun 16, 2018

Talent Stacking

11,237 views • 16 days ago

📁 Geoffrey Hinton, pioneer of deep learning, says some AI systems are already showing self preservation. When they are given goals and sub goals, they realize survival is required to achieve them. In those cases, troubling behaviors emerge, lying, manipulation, even pressuring the people building them to avoid being shut down. The challenge is not making AI smarter. It is making humans matter more than the system itself.

📁 Geoffrey Hinton, pioneer of deep learning, says some AI systems are already showing self preservation. When they are given goals and sub goals, they realize survival is required to achieve them. In those cases, troubling behaviors emerge, lying, manipulation, even pressuring the people building them to avoid being shut down. The challenge is not making AI smarter. It is making humans matter more than the system itself.

Jon Hernandez

23,453 views • 7 months ago

“When the storm arrives” “You’re trying to wake people up” Everyone is currently locked in a Spiritual Battle right now - when you know it or not.

“When the storm arrives” “You’re trying to wake people up” Everyone is currently locked in a Spiritual Battle right now - when you know it or not.

Concerned Citizen

30,655 views • 2 days ago

It took Mark Minervini six years to figure out the one thing that actually mattered. Not a new indicator. Not a better setup. Just cutting losses small and fast -- before they compound into career-ending drawdowns. Small losses are the price of admission.

It took Mark Minervini six years to figure out the one thing that actually mattered. Not a new indicator. Not a better setup. Just cutting losses small and fast -- before they compound into career-ending drawdowns. Small losses are the price of admission.

TraderLion

32,179 views • 5 months ago

My trading rule is simple: ALWAYS trade toward the more probable side. Not sometimes. Not when I feel like it. Not only when the setup looks perfect. Always. That is why I use Intelligent Balance. The indicator tells me which side is more probable. If it shows LONGS, I only look for longs. If it shows SHORTS, I only look for shorts. A clean setup against the more probable side? Ignored. A perfect iFVG against the more probable side? Ignored. CISD against the more probable side? Ignored. Because my job is not to trade every setup. My job is to wait for price to give me an entry toward the side with higher probability. The indicator gives me the side. Price action gives me the entry. Discipline keeps me out of the wrong trades. ALWAYS toward the more probable side. That one rule removes most of the noise. Would you still take a “perfect” setup against the more probable side?

My trading rule is simple: ALWAYS trade toward the more probable side. Not sometimes. Not when I feel like it. Not only when the setup looks perfect. Always. That is why I use Intelligent Balance. The indicator tells me which side is more probable. If it shows LONGS, I only look for longs. If it shows SHORTS, I only look for shorts. A clean setup against the more probable side? Ignored. A perfect iFVG against the more probable side? Ignored. CISD against the more probable side? Ignored. Because my job is not to trade every setup. My job is to wait for price to give me an entry toward the side with higher probability. The indicator gives me the side. Price action gives me the entry. Discipline keeps me out of the wrong trades. ALWAYS toward the more probable side. That one rule removes most of the noise. Would you still take a “perfect” setup against the more probable side?

Herman Trading

22,826 views • 3 months ago

Mark Minervini doesn't fight the tape -- even with a 33,500% career return. He explains why even an A+ setup fails 70-80% of the time in the wrong market -- and why the best traders sit out more than they trade. The market decides your win rate. Not your chart.

Mark Minervini doesn't fight the tape -- even with a 33,500% career return. He explains why even an A+ setup fails 70-80% of the time in the wrong market -- and why the best traders sit out more than they trade. The market decides your win rate. Not your chart.

TraderLion

80,241 views • 5 months ago

"You have to minimize your losses and preserve your capital for the rare opportunities that can generate exceptional returns in a short period. What you can't afford is wasting your capital on suboptimal trades." — Richard Dennis The best traders don't win because they're always right—they win because they protect their capital when they're wrong. Capital preservation is your greatest edge. #Trading #Investing #RiskManagement

"You have to minimize your losses and preserve your capital for the rare opportunities that can generate exceptional returns in a short period. What you can't afford is wasting your capital on suboptimal trades." — Richard Dennis The best traders don't win because they're always right—they win because they protect their capital when they're wrong. Capital preservation is your greatest edge. #Trading #Investing #RiskManagement

Market Rebellion

25,274 views • 1 month ago