Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

"Everything that relates to Islam comes from a book and commentaries which do not originate in India" Owaisi's logic destroyed by Sai Deepak J in Owaisi's own words 🔥

587,425 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Dilshad
Dilshad2 лет назад

@jsaideepak 😂Why sharing a clipped video. Share the whole debate without effects. It will be clear who defeated who

Фото профиля Kashmiri Hindu
Kashmiri Hindu2 лет назад

@jsaideepak Dear Abdul, Why don't you share the whole debate and show us who got destroyed 🤣

Фото профиля पाकीट तज्ञ
पाकीट तज्ञ2 лет назад

@jsaideepak JSD is a great talker but his holier than thou attitude turns many away. A bit of humility (atleast with fellow Hindus) will go a long way.

Фото профиля कृष्ण कुमार कुशवाहा
कृष्ण कुमार कुशवाहा2 лет назад

@jsaideepak Just ask three questions to owaisi or anybody 1. What is most important - nation or religion 2. What is above - constitution or Quran 3. Are you Indian first aur Muslim first Why are they support Palestine when it never supported India?? Just ask

Фото профиля Anu Satheesh 🇮🇳🚩
Anu Satheesh 🇮🇳🚩2 лет назад

@jsaideepak 🔥

Фото профиля Aanand Krishna
Aanand Krishna2 лет назад

@jsaideepak Dhaaga khol diya inhone to..

Фото профиля RD
RD2 лет назад

@jsaideepak Poor Owaisi! 😂

Фото профиля प्रियंवदा 🇮🇳🚩
प्रियंवदा 🇮🇳🚩2 лет назад

@jsaideepak Haha 🔥🔥🔥

Фото профиля Anita V
Anita V2 лет назад

@jsaideepak Islamists are terrible at debating using reasoning. They think they are being clever but are really just exposing their ignorance of the principles of a good debate.

Фото профиля Anaamika🇮🇳
Anaamika🇮🇳2 лет назад

@jsaideepak Lol..every single time I watch this video , I laugh out loud.

Похожие видео

Mahua Moitra & J Sai Deepak's Fiery Exchange Over Hindutva & Hinduism “Hindutva Exists Because…” The Debate 2026 by the Calcutta Debating Circle sets the stage for a charged and unfiltered clash on one of India’s most polarising questions: “Hinduism Needs Protection From Hindutva.” A fiery face-off between TMC MP Mahua Moitra and legal scholar J Sai Deepak as they lock horns over faith, politics, identity, and the future of Indian democracy. Sharp arguments, ideological fault lines, and no easy answers. This is a debate that cuts to the core of contemporary India. Moitra took jibes at her senior Swapan Da, which obviously people found uncalled for and not funny at all. J Sai Deepak, opposing the motion, he argued that Hinduism actually needs protection from secularism, rather than Hindutva. He challenged the narrative that Hindutva began with V.D. Savarkar in 1923. Instead, he traced its roots to 19th-century Bengal (1860s–1909) as an “organic Shakta response” to colonial invasion, citing figures like Bankim Chandra Chatterjee and Sri Aurobindo. He countered claims that Hindutva is “hyper-masculine” or strictly “Brahminical vegetarian,” asserting that Bengali masculinity and Shakta traditions (which include offerings of meat and alcohol) are foundational to Hindutva. J Sai Deepak argued that Hindutva is a civilizational necessity that translates into a political vision, and that it is unconstitutional to deny political representation to Hindutva while allowing it for other ideologies like communism. The event featured sharp rebuttals against co-debaters Mani Shankar Aiyar and Mahua Moitra. He accused Aiyar of conflating Hindutva solely with Savarkar and questioned Moitra on whether she had similar critiques for non-Hindu worldviews. The debate, which also featured Sudhanshu Trivedi and Ashutosh, concluded with the audience overwhelmingly voting against the motion, supporting J Sai Deepak's stance. In no way Moitra could’ve matched J Sai, nowhere near and totally decimated. Credit : ANI.

Augadh

100,347 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад