Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Everything that they could release about Epstein or JFK is already out there, so it's not disclosure, it's admission and confirmation. So I really don't understand what is holding up the show, besides Isreal's involvement in all of it.

177,991 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

10 Kommentare

Profilbild von K. Chaney
K. Chaneyvor 1 Jahr

My money is on a timing issue. Save Israel for last. We're still early in the goings on. This is our time.

Profilbild von Chip Owen
Chip Owenvor 1 Jahr

Better put some bullet proof glass on that beast behind you with all these truth bombs. Love your work man. Stay safe… and that isn’t some douchy threat. I mean it. Stay safe.

Profilbild von Your Daily Post
Your Daily Postvor 1 Jahr

Why did Two and a Half Men star Angus T. Jones call the show “filth” before leaving it in 2012? Since then, he’s left Hollywood, choosing to focus on his faith and community work. Here's the full story 👇

Profilbild von Chip Owen
Chip Owenvor 1 Jahr

I’m loving this take. It makes perfect sense with the seemingly random pivot Pam Bondi made to crack down on Anti-Semitism. Now it makes sense

Profilbild von Eric Ricker
Eric Rickervor 1 Jahr

he is correct, Israel has been in control over every government in the world. I know I will get hate for this , but Iseral was the cause of Germanys down fall, now it's not all the jews people , it's the Jewish bankers , they are the ones who control everything .

Profilbild von Kath Mac
Kath Macvor 1 Jahr

Bingo. You got it.

Profilbild von Captain Hugh Smith
Captain Hugh Smithvor 1 Jahr

We don't need more laws

Profilbild von Lisa
Lisavor 1 Jahr

“There will be some that say they are Jews, but they are not.” In the Old Testament, Pharisees held to the Law of Moses, so much so, they hated Jesus for spreading the truth of God’s true word. The Nation of Israel (Pharisees who lead it) still do not recognize the Son of man.

Profilbild von Lady
Ladyvor 1 Jahr

Genius thoughts on it! I just finished a book on LBJ today. I believe 1) LBJ, Intelligence Agencies, etc. were in on it and 2) JFK, RFK, MLK JR were probably deleted by the same groups. Thank u for clarifying the diff between govs & its citizens. All Truth 🫶 Saving this video.

Profilbild von DIRTY SANDCHEZ
DIRTY SANDCHEZvor 1 Jahr

L B J HAD HIM KILLED THAT P.O.S

Ähnliche Videos

.gorklon rust on what Department of Government Efficiency has found so far: "We do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there are quite a few -- people in, in the bureaucracy who, who have ostensibly a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions of dollars in net worth while they are in that position, which is, you know, what happened at USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing, in which case we should take their investment advice perhaps, but just -- there seems to be mysteriously, they they get wealthy. We don't know why. Where does it come from? And I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at taxpayer expense. That's -- that's the -- that's the honest truth of it. So, you know, we're looking at, say, well, we would just -- if you look at, say, say Treasury, for example, basic controls that should be in place that are in place in any company, such as making sure that any given payment has a payment categorization code, that there is a comment field that describes the payment and if the payment is on the do not pay list, that you don't actually pay it. None of those things are true currently, so the reason that departments can't pass audits is because the payments don't have a categorization code. It's like just a massive number of blank checks just flying out the building. So you can't reconcile blank checks. You've got a comment fields that are also blank, so you don't know why the payment was made and then we've got this truly absurd a do not pay list, which can take up to a year for an organization to get on a do no pay list and we're talking about terrorist organizations. We're talking about, known fraudsters, known aspects of waste, known things that do not match any congressional appropriation can take up to a year to get on the list and even once on the list, the list is not used. It's mind blowing. So -- so what we're talking about here, we're really just talking about adding common sense controls that should be present, that that haven't been present. So you say like, well, how could such a thing arise? That's that seems that seems crazy that when you understand that really everything is geared towards complaint minimization, so that -- then you understand the motivations. So, if people receive money, they don't complain, obviously, but if people don't receive money, they do complain and -- and the fraudsters complain the loudest and the fastest. So, then when you understand that, then it makes sense. Oh that's why everything just they approve all the payments at Treasury b/c if you approve all the payments, you don't -- you don't get complaints. But now now we're saying no, no, actually, we're all going to complain if money is spent badly, if -- if your taxpayer dollars are not spent in a sensible and frugal manner, then that's not okay. Your -- your tax dollars need to be spent wisely on the things that matter to the people. I mean, these things like it's just common sense. It's not. It's it's not draconian or radical. I think it's really just saying, let's look at each each of these expenditures and say, is this actually in the best interest of the people? And if it is, it's approved. If it's not, we should think about it."

Curtis Houck

14,545 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr