Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Evidence for the use of high-temperature explosives on 9/11: Workman found it "hard to believe" that a piece of steel from the WTC had bent "because of the size of it and how there's no cracks in the iron," and comments, "It takes thousands of degrees to bend steel...

shoestring911's profile picture

Shoestring 9/11

6,380 subscribers

246,991 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

[RG911Team] The 9/11 evidence is too hot to handle. Literally. That’s why the Trump, Biden, Obama and Bush administrations refused to touch it. The evidence of molten steel and iron will burn the 9/11 deception to the ground.
0:43

[RG911Team] The 9/11 evidence is too hot to handle. Literally. That’s why the Trump, Biden, Obama and Bush administrations refused to touch it. The evidence of molten steel and iron will burn the 9/11 deception to the ground.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

60,900 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

The South Tower: Video footage shows a stream of glowing, silvery-orange liquid pouring from the northeast corner of the South Tower (around the 80th floor) shortly before it fell. THERMITE? In short, thermite does not “eat” steel chemically; it delivers enough heat and molten iron to melt, mix with, and fuse steel, which is why it is valued for field welding of large steel sections and ➡️ can also be used to cut metal when applied in a focused way. The mixture is hard to start (it needs a high-temperature igniter such as a magnesium strip or special starter powder) but once running it is self-sustaining and difficult to extinguish. Effect on steel Steel melts at roughly 1,370–1,540 °C depending on composition. Thermite easily exceeds that, so it can both melt steel and deposit new molten iron that fuses with it. MORE 9/11 TRUTH AT THE WORLD'S CONNECTION TO UNSTOPPABLE TRUTH AT 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT
2:38

The South Tower: Video footage shows a stream of glowing, silvery-orange liquid pouring from the northeast corner of the South Tower (around the 80th floor) shortly before it fell. THERMITE? In short, thermite does not “eat” steel chemically; it delivers enough heat and molten iron to melt, mix with, and fuse steel, which is why it is valued for field welding of large steel sections and ➡️ can also be used to cut metal when applied in a focused way. The mixture is hard to start (it needs a high-temperature igniter such as a magnesium strip or special starter powder) but once running it is self-sustaining and difficult to extinguish. Effect on steel Steel melts at roughly 1,370–1,540 °C depending on composition. Thermite easily exceeds that, so it can both melt steel and deposit new molten iron that fuses with it. MORE 9/11 TRUTH AT THE WORLD'S CONNECTION TO UNSTOPPABLE TRUTH AT 17PLUS WORLDWIDE TRUTH NETWORK AT

AMERICANDREAM09 🇺🇸 Jack Media ~DREAM

366,101 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Trying something new – some thoughts from me on the events (specifically the release of the Hinman documents) of this week. For me, this has all had a personal bent to it - and felt like it warranted some personal comments.
3:57

Trying something new – some thoughts from me on the events (specifically the release of the Hinman documents) of this week. For me, this has all had a personal bent to it - and felt like it warranted some personal comments.

Brad Garlinghouse

4,238,972 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

Charlize Theron reveals that every room in the house she grew up in in South Africa had steel doors because of the violence, as the country was on the brink of civil war. We had gone to see a movie, and my dad had taken the key to the side door, not even the front door, the front steel door. Every room in our house had a steel door. So if you got in through the front door, the kitchen had a steel door that you had to unlock, because that’s the kind of violence we were living in. Nonsensical violence. Like, violence that you couldn’t reason with. It just… I mean, our country was on the brink of civil war. It was frightening.
0:39

Charlize Theron reveals that every room in the house she grew up in in South Africa had steel doors because of the violence, as the country was on the brink of civil war. We had gone to see a movie, and my dad had taken the key to the side door, not even the front door, the front steel door. Every room in our house had a steel door. So if you got in through the front door, the kitchen had a steel door that you had to unlock, because that’s the kind of violence we were living in. Nonsensical violence. Like, violence that you couldn’t reason with. It just… I mean, our country was on the brink of civil war. It was frightening.

Ruzy

9,247,951 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

[RG911Team] They let the cat out of the bag. The FDNY Chief just admitted what really happens to steel skyscrapers when columns fail. And in doing so, he exposed the 9/11 narrative as an outright lie. Under no circumstances can a local column failure cause the complete collapse of a steel-framed, fire-resistant skyscraper. This could not happen to the Pfizer building in Manhattan a few days ago, and it could not happen to WTC Building 7 in Manhattan on September 11, 2001. A local failure causes local collapse, not global collapse, because the network of steel columns throughout the building prevents the failure from propagating to other structurally sound parts of the building. In other words, steel skyscrapers are not houses of cards. So, when NIST claimed that the failure of one column in Building 7 caused a cascade of failures that brought down the entire building on 9/11, they are violating the laws of physics. They know this. But for them, maintaining scientific integrity is not as important as covering up the truth. Great find by 911WarRoom
0:40

[RG911Team] They let the cat out of the bag. The FDNY Chief just admitted what really happens to steel skyscrapers when columns fail. And in doing so, he exposed the 9/11 narrative as an outright lie. Under no circumstances can a local column failure cause the complete collapse of a steel-framed, fire-resistant skyscraper. This could not happen to the Pfizer building in Manhattan a few days ago, and it could not happen to WTC Building 7 in Manhattan on September 11, 2001. A local failure causes local collapse, not global collapse, because the network of steel columns throughout the building prevents the failure from propagating to other structurally sound parts of the building. In other words, steel skyscrapers are not houses of cards. So, when NIST claimed that the failure of one column in Building 7 caused a cascade of failures that brought down the entire building on 9/11, they are violating the laws of physics. They know this. But for them, maintaining scientific integrity is not as important as covering up the truth. Great find by 911WarRoom

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

153,466 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

[RG911Team] Rare video showing fire crews spraying water on the remains of WTC Building 7 after it came down on 9/11. How could a 47-story steel framed skyscraper be turned into this? The Univ of Alaska studied it and their results destroy the official story. See comment ⬇️
2:16

[RG911Team] Rare video showing fire crews spraying water on the remains of WTC Building 7 after it came down on 9/11. How could a 47-story steel framed skyscraper be turned into this? The Univ of Alaska studied it and their results destroy the official story. See comment ⬇️

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

236,852 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Rare video shows Bob Kelman, manager of a steel recycler, inspecting steel from the Twin Towers after 9/11. What caused the steel to bend like a pretzel? Fires can’t do that. What does Kelman say that contradicts the official story?
0:28

Rare video shows Bob Kelman, manager of a steel recycler, inspecting steel from the Twin Towers after 9/11. What caused the steel to bend like a pretzel? Fires can’t do that. What does Kelman say that contradicts the official story?

illuminatibot

624,784 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

A PIECE OF 9/11 HISTORY WITH TRUMP Tunnel to Towers Chairman and CEO Frank Siller presents President Trump with a piece of the American flag containing steel from the World Trade Center’s South Tower. The presentation comes as Tunnel to Towers marks the 25th anniversary of 9/11 with its Steel Across America tour. For more updates, watch OAN on OAN Live.
1:09

A PIECE OF 9/11 HISTORY WITH TRUMP Tunnel to Towers Chairman and CEO Frank Siller presents President Trump with a piece of the American flag containing steel from the World Trade Center’s South Tower. The presentation comes as Tunnel to Towers marks the 25th anniversary of 9/11 with its Steel Across America tour. For more updates, watch OAN on OAN Live.

One America News

22,572 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

[RG911Team] This fact alone proves 9/11 was a false flag. The Twin Towers were designed with the lightest, thinnest steel on the top floors, and each lower section used thicker, heavier and stronger steel than the one above it. This made a progressive collapse IMPOSSIBLE. The idea that a thin, light steel beam would collapse and then crush thick, strong steel below it… and that would in turn crush the even thicker and stronger steel below it… all through the path of GREATEST resistance… all in less than 12 seconds… violates the laws of physics. This is why FDNY sent hundreds of their best firefighters in those buildings. They knew the planes and fires could not completely collapse the towers because the extremely robust design would easily withstand it. 343 firefighters died on 9/11 because they were caught off guard by something no one expected - every single column being ripped apart and blown in every direction. And the only force that can do that requires explosives.
1:23

[RG911Team] This fact alone proves 9/11 was a false flag. The Twin Towers were designed with the lightest, thinnest steel on the top floors, and each lower section used thicker, heavier and stronger steel than the one above it. This made a progressive collapse IMPOSSIBLE. The idea that a thin, light steel beam would collapse and then crush thick, strong steel below it… and that would in turn crush the even thicker and stronger steel below it… all through the path of GREATEST resistance… all in less than 12 seconds… violates the laws of physics. This is why FDNY sent hundreds of their best firefighters in those buildings. They knew the planes and fires could not completely collapse the towers because the extremely robust design would easily withstand it. 343 firefighters died on 9/11 because they were caught off guard by something no one expected - every single column being ripped apart and blown in every direction. And the only force that can do that requires explosives.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

1,245,087 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Thousands of families are switching to HexClad because it makes everyday cooking effortless and delicious. HexClad hybrid cookware combines your favorite parts of nonstick, stainless steel, and cast iron into a single pan without all of the downsides.
0:25

Thousands of families are switching to HexClad because it makes everyday cooking effortless and delicious. HexClad hybrid cookware combines your favorite parts of nonstick, stainless steel, and cast iron into a single pan without all of the downsides.

HexClad

769,733 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

[RG911Team] “Jet fuel can’t melt steel - but it can weaken it.” This blacksmith got famous for making this pointless argument in defense of the official 9/11 story, and we have debunked it, piece by piece. What do you think?
5:29

[RG911Team] “Jet fuel can’t melt steel - but it can weaken it.” This blacksmith got famous for making this pointless argument in defense of the official 9/11 story, and we have debunked it, piece by piece. What do you think?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

12,490 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?
0:22

*** Test Your 9/11 Knowledge: The Explosive Evidence at the 3 WTC Towers The 50 Questions NIST Should Have Asked 20 Years Ago! WTC Building 7 Free-fall 1. How is it possible that 47-story Building 7 fell suddenly, symmetrically in free-fall acceleration, without any resistance from any of its 81 columns? 2. Why did NIST deny its free-fall for 7 years, only to be proven wrong and be forced to officially admit that it did collapse in free-fall? Symmetry 3. How, if Building 7 was damaged asymmetrically in the north-east corner on floor twelve, as per the NIST report, could it fall symmetrically downward? Shouldn’t the building have tilted toward its damaged side – and not fall straight down through the path of what was the greatest resistance? Fires 4. How could a few, small, and scattered ordinary office fires have brought this Type-1 fire-protected steel-frame skyscraper down, when several dozen examples of much hotter, much larger, and longer-lasting fires have never in history brought down such a building? 5. How could normal office fires take out all the columns in the building sequentially floor by floor, in 7 seconds? 6. Why did NIST claim that the fires were still burning, up until the time of the collapse, when the photos show that they were burnt out more than an hour before the collapse? 7. Why aren’t all the firefighters concerned, in the wake of the NIST report during the last 24 years, that such ordinary fightable fires can now bring skyscrapers down on top of them, and on top of the public who are told to “defend in place” in the building (and not obstruct access by firefighters)? 8. Why are many of these same firefighters calling for a new investigation of the NIST report itself? Controlled Demolition 9. Since the collapse of Building 7 looks exactly like a controlled demolition, why did NIST avoid any serious consideration of this hypothesis? 10. How could a 40,000-ton moment-resisting and X-braced structural steel frame collapse like a house of cards in 7 seconds, with most of its columns and beams severed – one from another? 11. Why does WTC 7 have all of the key features of typical controlled demolition, and none of the features of collapse by fire? Explosions 12. Why didn’t NIST include in its report on WTC 7 the half-dozen witnesses of explosions prior to its collapse, and even claim that there were no witnesses? 13. What could have caused an elevator cab to be “blown 30 feet out of its hoistway,” as Deputy Director of NY-Office of Emergency Management, Richard Rotanz, reported at Noon, when the building didn’t collapse for another 5 hours. 14. What caused Barry Jennings and Michael Hess to be injured by explosions and subsequently trapped in the building before either Twin Tower collapsed? Foreknowledge 15. Why did Fire Chief Nick Visconti declare, “We’re moving the command post over this way, that building’s coming down!”? 16. How could Fire Chief Hayden’s engineer declare, upon being asked, “how long until the building comes down?” – then accurately state, “In its current state you have about 5 hours,” when no steel-frame fire-protected high-rise had ever come down due to fire alone? 17. Why did construction workers, while walking away from Building 7 and upon hearing an explosion from the building, look straight into the CNN camera saying, “You hear that? Keep your eye on that building. That thing’s coming down. The building is about to blow up, flame and debris coming down”? 18. Why did former Air Force medic Kevin McPadden hear a “3-2-1” countdown on the radio, and subsequently hear explosions before Building 7 collapsed? 19. How could the BBC have announced, live on TV, the collapse of WTC 7 20 minutes before it collapsed? 20. Why did CNN announce, 7 hours early, the 10:45 AM collapse of a 50-story building (obviously referring to Building 7)? Expert Statements 21. Why have more than 3,600 Architects & Engineers signed onto the petition at demanding a new 9/11 WTC investigation? 22. Why are dozens of structural engineers making statements such as: “A localized failure in a steel-framed building like WTC 7 cannot cause a catastrophic collapse like a house of cards, without a simultaneous and patterned loss of several of its columns at key locations within the building”? 23. Why did the top European controlled demolition expert declare: “That is controlled demolition. It’s been imploded. It’s a hired job. A team of experts did this? 24. Why did top forensic structural engineer, Prof. Leroy Hulsey from the University of Alaska, following a 4-year study of WTC 7, declare: “The collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Extreme Heat Molten Metal 25. What does it mean that FEMA, in its 2002 Report, including a metallurgical examination of the WTC 7 steel, revealed “a phenomenon never before observed in building fires….a liquid eutectic mixture containing primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur formed during this hot corrosion attack on the steel...” Why did NIST eliminate this metallurgical report from their final report? 26. Did Fire Protection Engineer Jonathan Barnett know, when he said, “steel members in the debris pile that appear to have been partly evaporated,” that it takes 4,000°F to evaporate steel? And that jet fuel and office fires don’t even rise to a third of that temperature? 27. Why is there bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the crab claw excavators in the WTC pit? And out of the South Tower just minutes before its collapse. 28. Why did the first responders in the pit report, “you get down in the pile, and you see molten steel – flowing down the channel rails, like lava from a volcano”? Did they know that it takes 3,000°F to melt steel, and that office fires and jet fuel can only achieve half of this temperature? 29. What can explain the well-documented 3,000°F temperatures that are well-documented in the WTC Twin Towers collapse aftermath? Why is there evidence of ignited thermite found by so many first responders in the WTC pile? Previously Molten Iron Microspheres 30. What does it mean that the US Geological Survey and RJ Lee Group independently documented billions of previously molten iron-rich microspheres in ALL of the WTC dust samples? Where would the required 3,000°F come from? Could the ignited thermite have created those molten iron microspheres? 31. Why is bright yellow molten steel or iron pouring out of the South Tower just minutes prior to its collapse? 32. What explains the 2009 peer-reviewed findings from the Niels Harrit research team of dual-layered red-gray chips of nano-thermite in all the independently-collected dust samples they analyzed? Why do they ignite at the same temperature as military grade “super-thermite”? Why do they produce molten iron-rich microspheres when ignited? 33. What does it mean that Harrit’s international research team found that the “red layer of the red/gray chips in all of their WTC dust samples is active unreacted thermitic material, incorporating nanotechnology, and is a highly energetic pyrotechnic or explosive material”? The Twin Towers Official Explanation 34. How can the official explanation of the Twin Towers’ collapse be true (that an intact top section drove down the rest of the building after weakening of some of the structural steel in the impact zone) when this top section had already been destroyed in the first 3 seconds of the collapse (telescoping in on itself) and so was not even available to drive anything down to the ground? NIST claims that the top part of the building drove the rest of the building down to the ground. Why then do none of the photos or videos show such a top part driving anything down? And why didn’t that top “pile driver” drive down the 800-foot-tall group of columns standing for 6 seconds after the overall collapse? 35. Why did Zdenek Bazant, in his calculations for his controversial paper submitted to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 9/13/01( only two days after 9/11) use twice the actual mass of the upper section of the North Tower above the impact floors and only one third of the actual column strength of the larger building section beneath it in his support for NIST collapse theory? a. Why is this paper still today the key theoretical basis of NIST’s column failure theory? 36. Why does the destruction of the towers look more like a volcanic eruption (than a straight-down gravitational collapse) with upward and outward arching streamers, a geometry of fireworks, freely flying solid molten objects trailing thick white smoke clouds? Witnesses of Explosions 37. Why are there 156 First Responder witnesses of explosions – seeing, hearing, and feeling explosions – many of them BEFORE the towers ever came down? 38. Why did NIST claim that there were “no witnesses of explosions” when there were as many as 200 publicly recorded testimonies – many before the collapse? What could explain Fire Chief Frank Cruthers’ testimony that, “… an explosion… appeared at the very top, simultaneously from all four sides, materials shot out horizontally. And then there seemed to be a momentary delay, before you could see the beginning of the collapse”? 39. Why did 36 reporters on the day of 9/11 report the WTC destruction as an explosion-based event, most of them actual witnesses of explosions? a. Why did the mainstream national media change the story the next day from explosion-based collapses to “fire-induced collapses”? 40. Why did the FBI, NYPD, and FDNY on the day of 9/11 all state that they suspected that explosives were used to bring down the towers, but change their story in the following week to fire-induced collapse? Seismic Evidence 41. Why did the Richter Scale recordings from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events for both towers, more than a dozen seconds before the planes hit either tower – corroborating the explosive testimony of William Rodriguez and others of massive explosions in the basement prior to the plane hitting the buildings? 42. Why did the seismic evidence from Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory document significant seismic events, in the North Tower, 5 seconds before the heaviest debris from each tower struck the ground? And in the South Tower, 7 seconds before any debris struck the ground? Wouldn’t this seismic evidence corroborate the testimony of the first responders that saw, heard, and/or felt explosions before the towers fell? 43. Why did at least 3 of the tripod-mounted cameras (two on the ground and one on the rooftop) “shake” 3 to 10 seconds before each of the towers fell? Would the camera evidence corroborate the seismic evidence and the first responder's explosive testimony? Explosive Evidence 44. Since the damage from the planes and fires was so asymmetrical, why was the destruction itself so precisely symmetrical – all the way down each face of each tower? Why do the videos show precise rows of individual explosions progressing down the towers – floor by floor? 45. Why do we see in the videos isolated pin-point explosive ejections occurring 20, 40, and even 60 stories down below the downward-traveling zone of destruction in each tower? Descent Profile and Speed 46. Why did the top sections of each tower descend suddenly, smoothly, down with no stoppage or “jolt” upon impact with the cold, hard, intact steel columns below the floors of the plane impacts? 47. How was it possible that the top section of each Tower descended without slowing at all, but instead accelerated, as if 80,000 tons of steel beneath wasn’t even there? What happened to the steel? Lateral Ejection of Steel 48. Why do we see in the videos the lateral ejection out of both of the Towers of hundreds of freely flying structural steel sections each weighing 4 to 8 tons, at 80mph, landing up to 600 feet in every direction, impaling all of the surrounding skyscrapers? Why are they trailing thick white smoke clouds when steel is not flammable in office fires, or under jet fuel conditions? Could this be due to the other byproduct of thermite – aluminum oxide ash? 49. Since FEMA officially documented a 1200-foot diameter zone of flying, fallen, and impaled structural steel beyond the footprints of both Towers, how could that steel, which comprised 1/3 of the weight of the falling section of each building, have still been available to crush the lower part as NIST claimed? Missing Floors 50. Since there were 110 concrete floors, each an acre in size, and since they were not stacked up in pile of “pancakes” at the bottom, and since a third of the WTC dust in the 3” thick blanket across Lower Manhattan from river to river is powdered concrete, then how could the concrete floors (also 1/3 of the weight of each Tower) be available to crush the building below? 51. What extreme-high temperature could have reduced 90,000 tons of concrete in each Tower back to its original aggregate, sand, and cement powder? Demolition Access 52. How could the perpetrators have gained access to the Towers to plant high energy explosives and incendiaries? Could a massive fireproofing upgrade project in the months and years prior to 9/11 have provided access to the underside of the floor systems to apply sprayed-on nano-thermite? Is it a coincidence that the WTC fireproofing upgrades occurred mostly on the floors that were hit by the planes on 9/11? Could the largest elevator modernization in the world in the 9 months prior to 9/11 have provided access to the core columns and beams? Is it just a coincidence that Ace Elevator employees were pulled out of the Towers on 9/11 for “union meeting”? Destruction of Evidence 53. Why was 99% of the WTC structural steel crime scene evidence loaded onto barges starting just 2 weeks after 9/11 and shipped to China for recycling before structural engineers and metallurgists could get their hands on it to do a proper forensic investigation? We encougage you to ask these questions of your elected representatives and the media. We address most of these questions in our presentations and podcast and radio interviews. So get is in front of them! Who do you know that might interview RichardGage911 about the explosive destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Skyscrapers on 9/11?

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect

44,559 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

This is what the BIRTH of a MULTI-PLANETARY SPECIES looks like. A 200-foot tower of steel falling from the edge of space, only to be caught by the very hands that built it. The future just arrived, and it looks impossible.
0:58

This is what the BIRTH of a MULTI-PLANETARY SPECIES looks like. A 200-foot tower of steel falling from the edge of space, only to be caught by the very hands that built it. The future just arrived, and it looks impossible.

Curiosity

181,565 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

I haven't heard this interview before today... It's very interesting.. Donald Trump - September 11, 2001 - Radio Interview “This country is different today, and it's going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.” Radio Host: Donald, you're probably the best-known builder, particularly of great buildings in the city. There's a great deal of question about whether or not the damage and the ultimate destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes, by architectural defect, or possibly by bombs or aftershocks. Do you have any thoughts on that? Donald Trump: Well, it wasn't architectural defect. You know, the World Trade Center was always known as a very, very strong building. Don't forget, that took a big bomb in the basement. Now, the basement is the most vulnerable place, because that's your foundation. And it withstood that. And I got to see that area about three or four days after it took place, because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour, because he did the building. And I said, I can't believe it. The building was standing solid, and half of the columns were blown out of itself. This was an unbelievably powerful building. If you know anything about structure, it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. You had the steel. The reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows, you had the steel on the outside. You had the steel on the outside of the building. That's why when I first looked, and you had big, heavy I-beams. When I first looked at it, I couldn't believe it, because there was a hole in the steel. And this is steel that was, you remember the width of the windows of the World Trade Center, folks? I think, you know, if you were ever up there, they were quite narrow. And in between was this heavy steel. I said, how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or a 747 or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through the steel? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously, because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steel that's on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have. And it was almost just like a can of soup. Radio Host: You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into Building No. 2, and when you see that approach the far side, and then all of a sudden, within a matter of a millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side. Donald Trump: Right. I just think that it was a plane with more than just fuel. I think, obviously, they were very big planes. They were going very rapidly, because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane, because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliper steel that was used on the building. I mean, these buildings were rock solid. And, you know, it's just an amazing, amazing thing. This country is different today, and it's going to be different than it ever was for many years to come. Radio Host: Very profound statement, and very true.
2:51

I haven't heard this interview before today... It's very interesting.. Donald Trump - September 11, 2001 - Radio Interview “This country is different today, and it's going to be different than it ever was for many years to come.” Radio Host: Donald, you're probably the best-known builder, particularly of great buildings in the city. There's a great deal of question about whether or not the damage and the ultimate destruction of the buildings was caused by the airplanes, by architectural defect, or possibly by bombs or aftershocks. Do you have any thoughts on that? Donald Trump: Well, it wasn't architectural defect. You know, the World Trade Center was always known as a very, very strong building. Don't forget, that took a big bomb in the basement. Now, the basement is the most vulnerable place, because that's your foundation. And it withstood that. And I got to see that area about three or four days after it took place, because one of my structural engineers actually took me for a tour, because he did the building. And I said, I can't believe it. The building was standing solid, and half of the columns were blown out of itself. This was an unbelievably powerful building. If you know anything about structure, it was one of the first buildings that was built from the outside. You had the steel. The reason the World Trade Center had such narrow windows is that in between all the windows, you had the steel on the outside. You had the steel on the outside of the building. That's why when I first looked, and you had big, heavy I-beams. When I first looked at it, I couldn't believe it, because there was a hole in the steel. And this is steel that was, you remember the width of the windows of the World Trade Center, folks? I think, you know, if you were ever up there, they were quite narrow. And in between was this heavy steel. I said, how could a plane, even a plane, even a 767 or a 747 or whatever it might have been, how could it possibly go through the steel? I happen to think that they had not only a plane, but they had bombs that exploded almost simultaneously, because I just can't imagine anything being able to go through that wall. Most buildings are built with the steel that's on the inside around the elevator shaft. This one was built from the outside, which is the strongest structure you can have. And it was almost just like a can of soup. Radio Host: You know, Donald, we were looking at pictures all morning long of that plane coming into Building No. 2, and when you see that approach the far side, and then all of a sudden, within a matter of a millisecond, the explosion pops out the other side. Donald Trump: Right. I just think that it was a plane with more than just fuel. I think, obviously, they were very big planes. They were going very rapidly, because I was also watching where the plane seemed to be not only going fast, it seemed to be coming down into the building. So it was getting the speed from going downhill, so to speak. It just seemed to me that to do that kind of destruction is even more than a big plane, because you're talking about taking out steel, the heaviest caliper steel that was used on the building. I mean, these buildings were rock solid. And, you know, it's just an amazing, amazing thing. This country is different today, and it's going to be different than it ever was for many years to come. Radio Host: Very profound statement, and very true.

Apple Lamps

71,603 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Vertical steel beams outlined the WTC. It wouldn’t enter the building. It would have crashed & dropped down. CGI Mini nukes were stolen from a plant in Texas by Bibi & the Mossad. Pancake demolition To destroy the criminal evidence of Bush Sr. And to start the war on terror. But we were the terrorists.
0:57

Vertical steel beams outlined the WTC. It wouldn’t enter the building. It would have crashed & dropped down. CGI Mini nukes were stolen from a plant in Texas by Bibi & the Mossad. Pancake demolition To destroy the criminal evidence of Bush Sr. And to start the war on terror. But we were the terrorists.

Karen4America

43,420 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Man of Steel taught me that belief doesn’t come before the leap, it’s born because of it. That’s faith. And sometimes, the fall teaches you how to fly #HenryCavillSuperMan
1:33

Man of Steel taught me that belief doesn’t come before the leap, it’s born because of it. That’s faith. And sometimes, the fall teaches you how to fly #HenryCavillSuperMan

A K K I

25,014 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr