Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Evil Morty Yeah, like… “a traumatized kid solving his problems with multiversal genocide” 😭 But honestly, what makes Evil Morty interesting is that he didn’t start out wanting to be a god or some pure evil villain. He started from hatred toward being controlled and used.

𝚂𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚊

2,762 subscribers

19,936 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This is a teaching most don't understand or accept. MacArthur on evil: "It is heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, but He ordained it because He had a purpose for it."

This is a teaching most don't understand or accept. MacArthur on evil: "It is heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, but He ordained it because He had a purpose for it."

Danny

113,231 views • 1 year ago

JUST IN: Tyler Robinson's messages with his lover read out loud, said he killed Charlie Kirk because he "had enough of his hatred." Roommate: "Why?" Robinson: "Why did I do it?" Roommate: "Yeah." Robinson: "I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out." Pure evil.

JUST IN: Tyler Robinson's messages with his lover read out loud, said he killed Charlie Kirk because he "had enough of his hatred." Roommate: "Why?" Robinson: "Why did I do it?" Roommate: "Yeah." Robinson: "I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can't be negotiated out." Pure evil.

Collin Rugg

718,764 views • 1 year ago

It didn’t take long before a Trump supporter shouted to Musk that George Soros is “evil”—to which Musk responded with a clear “Yeah.” He said Soros is “honestly misanthropic” and that “for someone who sort of claims to be doing good, but actually he is not. He is tearing down the fabric of society.¨

It didn’t take long before a Trump supporter shouted to Musk that George Soros is “evil”—to which Musk responded with a clear “Yeah.” He said Soros is “honestly misanthropic” and that “for someone who sort of claims to be doing good, but actually he is not. He is tearing down the fabric of society.¨

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

646,880 views • 2 years ago

So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it The Problem of Evil — John MacArthur // March 17, 2007 You have to understand that this issue of the problem of evil is the big issue, the big one in even evangelical Christianity, as well as liberal Christianity – everybody trying to save God from this biblical definition. Let’s assume for a minute that God doesn’t have the power or willingly limited the power for a greater good, human freedom; or doesn’t have the knowledge. In any case, guess what; evil exists and God exists, and God has no power over evil, and evil dominates the world, and it is beyond His control. The universe is out of control; it’s out of control and the most crucial point. So just exactly how, may I ask you, is God all of a sudden going to get the knowledge of the future that He needs to bring this deal to an end, and how is He going to exercise the power to end it, and how is He going to overturn His immutable decision in the past to give the creature autonomy? How is God going to define the end of everything in the way the Bible says He defines it if He’s not even in control of it, because He will not or cannot exercise the power, or doesn’t have the knowledge? Maybe global warming has more power than God. So I ask you this: Which god would you like? Would you rather have a god trying to get control of evil or a God completely in control of it? It’s obvious. It’s heresy to say the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God far beyond the willy-nilly human choices. So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it. It occurred in a rebellion against Him. But He willed and ordained that it occurred. In fact, if you study the Bible carefully, you can see many ways in which God designs to use evil things – natural evil, moral evil, supernatural evil – for His own purposes, even eternal evil, sometimes to bring fear and terror and conviction on the unregenerate, sometimes to bring chastisement and discipline on God’s people, sometimes to humble them. And in the case of Job, He turned Satan loose for horrendous evil in the life of Job. You remember that Jesus said to Peter one day, “Satan desires to have you that he may sift you like wheat”? Remember that, Luke 22? And if I’d had been Peter I’d have said, “Well, you told him no, right?” Jesus said, “Actually, I told him yes, have at him.” What? “So that when you’re converted, you can strengthen the brethren.” There’s a remedial purpose in this. “As you come through that difficulty and come out the other side, you’re going to be able to strengthen the brethren.”It was 2 Corinthians 12 where Paul says, “There was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan.” A lot of discussion about what that is. Pretty clear. Messenger is aggelos. A satanic messenger is a what; a demon. I don’t think Paul had a demon in his life, I think that’s the demon that was leading the false teachers who were ripping and shredding the Corinthian church, and Paul prayed three times that it might be removed, and the Lord didn’t remove it. Why? He says twice in 2 Corinthians 12, “to keep me from exalting myself, to keep me from exalting myself.” If God so designs He will use a demon-led false teacher association to rip up a church to humble the pastor. He’s in control of all of that, of all of it.

So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it The Problem of Evil — John MacArthur // March 17, 2007 You have to understand that this issue of the problem of evil is the big issue, the big one in even evangelical Christianity, as well as liberal Christianity – everybody trying to save God from this biblical definition. Let’s assume for a minute that God doesn’t have the power or willingly limited the power for a greater good, human freedom; or doesn’t have the knowledge. In any case, guess what; evil exists and God exists, and God has no power over evil, and evil dominates the world, and it is beyond His control. The universe is out of control; it’s out of control and the most crucial point. So just exactly how, may I ask you, is God all of a sudden going to get the knowledge of the future that He needs to bring this deal to an end, and how is He going to exercise the power to end it, and how is He going to overturn His immutable decision in the past to give the creature autonomy? How is God going to define the end of everything in the way the Bible says He defines it if He’s not even in control of it, because He will not or cannot exercise the power, or doesn’t have the knowledge? Maybe global warming has more power than God. So I ask you this: Which god would you like? Would you rather have a god trying to get control of evil or a God completely in control of it? It’s obvious. It’s heresy to say the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God far beyond the willy-nilly human choices. So evil exists, God exists, God willed evil to exist. He didn’t create it, He couldn’t. He’s holy, holy, holy. But He didn’t prevent it. It occurred in a rebellion against Him. But He willed and ordained that it occurred. In fact, if you study the Bible carefully, you can see many ways in which God designs to use evil things – natural evil, moral evil, supernatural evil – for His own purposes, even eternal evil, sometimes to bring fear and terror and conviction on the unregenerate, sometimes to bring chastisement and discipline on God’s people, sometimes to humble them. And in the case of Job, He turned Satan loose for horrendous evil in the life of Job. You remember that Jesus said to Peter one day, “Satan desires to have you that he may sift you like wheat”? Remember that, Luke 22? And if I’d had been Peter I’d have said, “Well, you told him no, right?” Jesus said, “Actually, I told him yes, have at him.” What? “So that when you’re converted, you can strengthen the brethren.” There’s a remedial purpose in this. “As you come through that difficulty and come out the other side, you’re going to be able to strengthen the brethren.”It was 2 Corinthians 12 where Paul says, “There was given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan.” A lot of discussion about what that is. Pretty clear. Messenger is aggelos. A satanic messenger is a what; a demon. I don’t think Paul had a demon in his life, I think that’s the demon that was leading the false teachers who were ripping and shredding the Corinthian church, and Paul prayed three times that it might be removed, and the Lord didn’t remove it. Why? He says twice in 2 Corinthians 12, “to keep me from exalting myself, to keep me from exalting myself.” If God so designs He will use a demon-led false teacher association to rip up a church to humble the pastor. He’s in control of all of that, of all of it.

Terri Green

16,871 views • 5 months ago

Tim Walz’s daughter pushes the “5-year-old attested by ICE” hoax, says JD Vance is “evil” for not wanting an unaccompanied child left out in the cold while his father ran from officers: “That man is EVIL. I like haven’t talked much about him, but he…yeah—SINISTER!” Unhinged.

Tim Walz’s daughter pushes the “5-year-old attested by ICE” hoax, says JD Vance is “evil” for not wanting an unaccompanied child left out in the cold while his father ran from officers: “That man is EVIL. I like haven’t talked much about him, but he…yeah—SINISTER!” Unhinged.

johnny maga

18,345 views • 9 months ago

Elon Musk on President Trump: "Some people still think Trump is like the devil. He’s not perfect, but he’s not evil. Trump is not evil. I spent a lot of time with him and he is not evil."

Elon Musk on President Trump: "Some people still think Trump is like the devil. He’s not perfect, but he’s not evil. Trump is not evil. I spent a lot of time with him and he is not evil."

DogeDesigner

129,017 views • 11 months ago

This is a stark biblical reminder that satan isn't a cartoon villain, he's a real being with intellect, will, and evil motives set out to devour all of us. Jesus called him the prince of this world, ruling over all of our systems, from politics, education, to even pop culture shaping our children's spiritual nature. People unwittingly worship satan by chasing worldly power, wealth, and fame. He will deliver, but always at a steep price. God permits this temporary dominion out of respect for free will, just as He allows human rebellion. Satan fiercely attacks Genesis, his origin tactics and Revelation, his ultimate defeat. We know who wins int he end. Jesus taught us to pray daily for a reason. "Deliver us from the evil one." In a world full of asleep people that laughs at the idea of spiritual evil or reduces it to "silly forces," much of what we see is deception, division and pursuit of wealth via evil methods by evil elites that have aligned themselves with evil, know they're fiery fate, and have set out to take us down with them out of rebellion and revenge to God. 1 Peter 5:8 — "Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour."

This is a stark biblical reminder that satan isn't a cartoon villain, he's a real being with intellect, will, and evil motives set out to devour all of us. Jesus called him the prince of this world, ruling over all of our systems, from politics, education, to even pop culture shaping our children's spiritual nature. People unwittingly worship satan by chasing worldly power, wealth, and fame. He will deliver, but always at a steep price. God permits this temporary dominion out of respect for free will, just as He allows human rebellion. Satan fiercely attacks Genesis, his origin tactics and Revelation, his ultimate defeat. We know who wins int he end. Jesus taught us to pray daily for a reason. "Deliver us from the evil one." In a world full of asleep people that laughs at the idea of spiritual evil or reduces it to "silly forces," much of what we see is deception, division and pursuit of wealth via evil methods by evil elites that have aligned themselves with evil, know they're fiery fate, and have set out to take us down with them out of rebellion and revenge to God. 1 Peter 5:8 — "Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour."

Bridgett Fertig

49,297 views • 1 month ago

This is a stark biblical reminder that satan isn't a cartoon villain, he's a real being with intellect, will, and evil motives set out to devour all of us. Jesus called him the prince of this world, ruling over all of our systems, from politics, education, to even pop culture shaping our children's spiritual nature. People unwittingly worship satan by chasing worldly power, wealth, and fame. He will deliver, but always at a steep price. God permits this temporary dominion out of respect for free will, just as He allows human rebellion. Satan fiercely attacks Genesis, his origin tactics and Revelation, his ultimate defeat. We know who wins int he end. Jesus taught us to pray daily for a reason. "Deliver us from the evil one." In a world full of asleep people that laughs at the idea of spiritual evil or reduces it to "silly forces," much of what we see is deception, division and pursuit of wealth via evil methods by evil elites that have aligned themselves with evil, know they're fiery fate, and have set out to take us down with them out of rebellion and revenge to God. 1 Peter 5:8 — "Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour."

This is a stark biblical reminder that satan isn't a cartoon villain, he's a real being with intellect, will, and evil motives set out to devour all of us. Jesus called him the prince of this world, ruling over all of our systems, from politics, education, to even pop culture shaping our children's spiritual nature. People unwittingly worship satan by chasing worldly power, wealth, and fame. He will deliver, but always at a steep price. God permits this temporary dominion out of respect for free will, just as He allows human rebellion. Satan fiercely attacks Genesis, his origin tactics and Revelation, his ultimate defeat. We know who wins int he end. Jesus taught us to pray daily for a reason. "Deliver us from the evil one." In a world full of asleep people that laughs at the idea of spiritual evil or reduces it to "silly forces," much of what we see is deception, division and pursuit of wealth via evil methods by evil elites that have aligned themselves with evil, know they're fiery fate, and have set out to take us down with them out of rebellion and revenge to God. 1 Peter 5:8 — "Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour."

Bridgett Fertig

159,423 views • 8 months ago

Can we end this line of thinking once and for all Satan is not an evil god, a fallen angel, or an independent force of evil opposing God He is a prosecutor in the heavenly court, acting only with God's permission His role is to accuse humans of sin, test their faithfulness, and challenge their righteousness - ultimately serving God's justice and the divine plan There is no dualistic battle between good and evil gods; evil arises from human free will and the yetzer hara (evil inclination).

Can we end this line of thinking once and for all Satan is not an evil god, a fallen angel, or an independent force of evil opposing God He is a prosecutor in the heavenly court, acting only with God's permission His role is to accuse humans of sin, test their faithfulness, and challenge their righteousness - ultimately serving God's justice and the divine plan There is no dualistic battle between good and evil gods; evil arises from human free will and the yetzer hara (evil inclination).

Seethroughitall

135,997 views • 10 months ago

Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. Why Does Evil Dominate the World? — John MacArthur // March 4, 2007 If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it – listen - and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? And I would ask you this: would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is in complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people. So, what do we know up to now? Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. This is critical: He had a purpose for evil. What is that purpose that God had for evil? Before I answer that question - and that’s the fourth in our little outline - let me read the Westminster Confession from the 1700s; some great theologians and biblical scholars put this together. Listen carefully: “God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass:“ Yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away ... sinfulness proceeds not only from the creature; proceeds only from the creature and not from God, who, being most holy and righteous, neither ... can be the author and approver of sin.” But then, says the Westminster Confession, all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory - and they got it right.The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory. Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the question - the bigger question: is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Pretty easy question to answer, isn’t it? That really is the ultimate question. Throughout all the eons of eternity, will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed or less? And, friends, that’s really all that matters, is the eternal glory of God. So, it’s fourth down, and we’re on the ten-yard line, and I’m pulling out the winning play and we’re going for six for the victory. Turn to Romans 3 - and I want you to track with me a little bit; can’t take time to develop all of this, but I’m going to give you a good start. Wish I could build context; we don’t have time. But let’s look at chapter 3 and verse 5. Opening statement: “But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say?” Grab that phrase: our right - unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. And Paul uses the first of a series of verbs; this one happens to be sunistēmi, translated demonstrates in the New American Standard. It is a verb that means to disclose, to reveal, to put on display, to show. Our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. Another way to say that would be, would you really understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness? Isn’t there something to be gained by the contrast? Paul has been showing that God is faithful to His promises to Israel, and their sin and unbelief cannot alter God’s covenant, cannot alter God’s faithfulness.

Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. Why Does Evil Dominate the World? — John MacArthur // March 4, 2007 If God is not in total control of evil, if He has not ordained it – listen - and if He does not have it under complete control at every millisecond of history, then this universe is out of control at the most crucial point. If God is not in control of this completely, then how and when will He get the knowledge and the power to get it under control? And I would ask you this: would you rather have a God trying to get control of evil, or a God completely in control of it? Take your choice. But the God of the Bible is in complete control of evil for His own purposes. It is really heresy to say that the world is full of evil apart from a predetermined plan and purpose by God that is far above the willy-nilly choices of people. So, what do we know up to now? Evil exists, God exists. God wills evil to exist. He did not create it, He could not create it, but He did not prevent it. He ordained it, He willed it - here it comes, listen carefully - because He had a purpose for it; He had a purpose for it - a purpose. This is critical: He had a purpose for evil. What is that purpose that God had for evil? Before I answer that question - and that’s the fourth in our little outline - let me read the Westminster Confession from the 1700s; some great theologians and biblical scholars put this together. Listen carefully: “God, from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass:“ Yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second-hand causes taken away ... sinfulness proceeds not only from the creature; proceeds only from the creature and not from God, who, being most holy and righteous, neither ... can be the author and approver of sin.” But then, says the Westminster Confession, all that God decrees and all that God providentially brings to pass is all to the praise of His glory - and they got it right.The reason for God ordaining evil is for the praise of His glory. Let me ask you a simple question to help you answer the question - the bigger question: is God more glorious because of sin existing or less glorious? Pretty easy question to answer, isn’t it? That really is the ultimate question. Throughout all the eons of eternity, will God receive more glory from His creatures because sin existed or less? And, friends, that’s really all that matters, is the eternal glory of God. So, it’s fourth down, and we’re on the ten-yard line, and I’m pulling out the winning play and we’re going for six for the victory. Turn to Romans 3 - and I want you to track with me a little bit; can’t take time to develop all of this, but I’m going to give you a good start. Wish I could build context; we don’t have time. But let’s look at chapter 3 and verse 5. Opening statement: “But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say?” Grab that phrase: our right - unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. And Paul uses the first of a series of verbs; this one happens to be sunistēmi, translated demonstrates in the New American Standard. It is a verb that means to disclose, to reveal, to put on display, to show. Our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God. Another way to say that would be, would you really understand the righteousness of God if you didn’t understand unrighteousness? Isn’t there something to be gained by the contrast? Paul has been showing that God is faithful to His promises to Israel, and their sin and unbelief cannot alter God’s covenant, cannot alter God’s faithfulness.

Terri Green

24,466 views • 5 months ago

ERIKA KIRK on her husband's alleged assassin: "I don't need closure. I don't need understanding. Evil's evil." "What this boils down to, honestly, is that he made a decision." "One day, he decided to let the smallest seed of evil in his heart. He decided not to extinguish that evil. Instead, he decided to feed it." "I don't need to ask him why he fed it. Evil is evil. So he kept feeding it — feeding it to the point where he murders my husband." "I have nothing to say to them. Their actions speak louder than their words ever could." Erika Kirk

ERIKA KIRK on her husband's alleged assassin: "I don't need closure. I don't need understanding. Evil's evil." "What this boils down to, honestly, is that he made a decision." "One day, he decided to let the smallest seed of evil in his heart. He decided not to extinguish that evil. Instead, he decided to feed it." "I don't need to ask him why he fed it. Evil is evil. So he kept feeding it — feeding it to the point where he murders my husband." "I have nothing to say to them. Their actions speak louder than their words ever could." Erika Kirk

Fox News

446,119 views • 10 months ago

Elon Musk : "Trump is not evil" The Biden administration is not exactly my best friend, especially after I helped Trump get elected. Some people still think Trump is the devil He’s not perfect, but he’s not evil. I spent a lot of time with him. He is a product of his time, but he is not evil The media treats him like he’s super evil It’s pretty shocking. I looked at mainstream media coverage of you, Trump, and a bunch of different public figures It’s like 96% negative or something crazy

Elon Musk : "Trump is not evil" The Biden administration is not exactly my best friend, especially after I helped Trump get elected. Some people still think Trump is the devil He’s not perfect, but he’s not evil. I spent a lot of time with him. He is a product of his time, but he is not evil The media treats him like he’s super evil It’s pretty shocking. I looked at mainstream media coverage of you, Trump, and a bunch of different public figures It’s like 96% negative or something crazy

X Freeze

40,286 views • 9 months ago

“Dave Smith’s Morality Is Actually Evil” Dave Smith is evil. Or, if you prefer to be charitable, his morality is; and that makes his worldview, and how he acts in the world, evil in practice. Dave Smith would know that if he was actually Jewish. Judaism does not judge morality by thoughts or intentions but by actions… and by that standard, Dave Smith is evil. Dave Smith is one of the loudest online voices opposed to Israel. He uses social media—most notably Joe Rogan’s bullhorn—to spread that opposition. And not through facts, expertise, or serious moral reasoning: Dave Smith doesn’t debate with facts, as Coleman Hughes pointed out. Dave Smith doesn’t understand urban warfare, as John Spencer made obvious. And Dave Smith doesn’t have a clue how to actually combat terrorism or defeat genocidal enemies, as Dave Smith himself ineptly revealed on TRIGGERnometry elsewhere. But if Dave Smith were merely a liar, an ignoramus, or a clown, that would be fine. It’s 2026. Social media is full of clowns. What makes Dave Smith dangerous is something worse. Dave Smith is a coward. He claims to be “anti-war” as a philosophy. In reality, he’s anti-war because he lacks the moral courage to confront evil. His worldview is built on refusal: refusal of responsibility, refusal of force, refusal of hard moral choices. That cowardice becomes evil when applied to the real world. Dave Smith is so reflexively anti-war that he uses Israel as a cudgel against the Iranian people themselves; people actively risking their lives to overthrow one of the most brutal, murderous regimes on earth. Let’s be clear about that regime: •It murders its own Olympians •It murders women for dancing or showing their hair •It murders people for protesting those murders Even if Dave Smith were right about Israel—and he isn’t—it would still be a moral good to oppose the Iranian regime. But because his morality is not rooted in Western Enlightenment philosophy—responsibility, agency, just war, moral clarity—Dave Smith collapses everything into childish transitive logic: “Israel bad! Therefore anyone who supports Israel is immoral. And therefore anyone who supports the Iranian people is also immoral.” This isn’t moral seriousness. It’s intellectual sloth. Dave Smith lies about genocide in Israel. Then, because of his immoral framework, he turns 2+2 into BREAKFAST! His worldview doesn’t just misunderstand evil… it incentivizes it. He treats any military action against terrorists or murderous regimes as inherently immoral. He has no answer for how evil is defeated. No framework for stopping genocidal enemies. No solution beyond posturing. And that’s the point. A morality that refuses to confront evil is not neutral. A philosophy that allows evil to flourish is itself evil. If you allow evil to flourish—and do nothing to stop it—you are complicit. If this were merely cowardice, maybe Dave Smith wouldn’t be evil. But he goes further: he actively condemns those who take the fight to terrorists and tyrants. “I’m anti-war,” he says… while excusing those who start wars, butcher civilians, and rule through terror. That isn’t peace. That’s surrender dressed up as virtue. Dave Smith is an unserious thinker who relies on his audience being just as unserious: “Israel bad! Ergo people who support Israel and also support the Iranian people are bad!” Dave Smith thinks you are immoral for supporting Israel in its war to defeat genocidal terrorists. And he thinks you are immoral for supporting the Iranian people who are trying to defeat a murderous, oppressive theocratic regime. Dave Smith is a liar. Dave Smith is a coward. And Dave Smith believes that defeating evil—in the only way it has ever been defeated, through force when necessary—is itself evil. If you think defeating evil is wrong like Dave Smith, you’re evil. Welcome to the Dave Smith Comedy Tour: acting morally righteous while ensuring evil flourishes… and attacking those trying to stop it.

“Dave Smith’s Morality Is Actually Evil” Dave Smith is evil. Or, if you prefer to be charitable, his morality is; and that makes his worldview, and how he acts in the world, evil in practice. Dave Smith would know that if he was actually Jewish. Judaism does not judge morality by thoughts or intentions but by actions… and by that standard, Dave Smith is evil. Dave Smith is one of the loudest online voices opposed to Israel. He uses social media—most notably Joe Rogan’s bullhorn—to spread that opposition. And not through facts, expertise, or serious moral reasoning: Dave Smith doesn’t debate with facts, as Coleman Hughes pointed out. Dave Smith doesn’t understand urban warfare, as John Spencer made obvious. And Dave Smith doesn’t have a clue how to actually combat terrorism or defeat genocidal enemies, as Dave Smith himself ineptly revealed on TRIGGERnometry elsewhere. But if Dave Smith were merely a liar, an ignoramus, or a clown, that would be fine. It’s 2026. Social media is full of clowns. What makes Dave Smith dangerous is something worse. Dave Smith is a coward. He claims to be “anti-war” as a philosophy. In reality, he’s anti-war because he lacks the moral courage to confront evil. His worldview is built on refusal: refusal of responsibility, refusal of force, refusal of hard moral choices. That cowardice becomes evil when applied to the real world. Dave Smith is so reflexively anti-war that he uses Israel as a cudgel against the Iranian people themselves; people actively risking their lives to overthrow one of the most brutal, murderous regimes on earth. Let’s be clear about that regime: •It murders its own Olympians •It murders women for dancing or showing their hair •It murders people for protesting those murders Even if Dave Smith were right about Israel—and he isn’t—it would still be a moral good to oppose the Iranian regime. But because his morality is not rooted in Western Enlightenment philosophy—responsibility, agency, just war, moral clarity—Dave Smith collapses everything into childish transitive logic: “Israel bad! Therefore anyone who supports Israel is immoral. And therefore anyone who supports the Iranian people is also immoral.” This isn’t moral seriousness. It’s intellectual sloth. Dave Smith lies about genocide in Israel. Then, because of his immoral framework, he turns 2+2 into BREAKFAST! His worldview doesn’t just misunderstand evil… it incentivizes it. He treats any military action against terrorists or murderous regimes as inherently immoral. He has no answer for how evil is defeated. No framework for stopping genocidal enemies. No solution beyond posturing. And that’s the point. A morality that refuses to confront evil is not neutral. A philosophy that allows evil to flourish is itself evil. If you allow evil to flourish—and do nothing to stop it—you are complicit. If this were merely cowardice, maybe Dave Smith wouldn’t be evil. But he goes further: he actively condemns those who take the fight to terrorists and tyrants. “I’m anti-war,” he says… while excusing those who start wars, butcher civilians, and rule through terror. That isn’t peace. That’s surrender dressed up as virtue. Dave Smith is an unserious thinker who relies on his audience being just as unserious: “Israel bad! Ergo people who support Israel and also support the Iranian people are bad!” Dave Smith thinks you are immoral for supporting Israel in its war to defeat genocidal terrorists. And he thinks you are immoral for supporting the Iranian people who are trying to defeat a murderous, oppressive theocratic regime. Dave Smith is a liar. Dave Smith is a coward. And Dave Smith believes that defeating evil—in the only way it has ever been defeated, through force when necessary—is itself evil. If you think defeating evil is wrong like Dave Smith, you’re evil. Welcome to the Dave Smith Comedy Tour: acting morally righteous while ensuring evil flourishes… and attacking those trying to stop it.

Jake Donnelly

18,571 views • 9 months ago

our first Soap Of The Day are the soapified remains of Evil F. Skeleton, evil f. skeleton. What? No, he didn't do anything. It's actually pretty regressive of you to just assume becoming soap is some sort of punishment. It's a gift. A gift from God. Accept it and you'll be free.

our first Soap Of The Day are the soapified remains of Evil F. Skeleton, evil f. skeleton. What? No, he didn't do anything. It's actually pretty regressive of you to just assume becoming soap is some sort of punishment. It's a gift. A gift from God. Accept it and you'll be free.

soap of the day

798,194 views • 1 year ago

Collins: Do you want to respond to what the vice president said today, saying that there is something that is, quote, “very, very evil” about you? El-Sayed: Well, let me tell you what’s evil. Evil is the idea of starting wars when there is peace. Evil is the idea of stripping away people’s health care when they absolutely have no other option. What’s evil is to do that so that you can pass a tax cut for billionaires. What’s evil is putting a data center that people don’t want in their backyard despite them. What’s evil is corrupting yourself because you want a little bit more power… To come to Michigan from Ohio, where he's from, to tell us that we ought to pay for a vanity trade war, that his president is spiking with Canada. Well, that's a little bit beyond the pale, and I think he can go take himself back to Ohio, where apparently they like politics like that

Collins: Do you want to respond to what the vice president said today, saying that there is something that is, quote, “very, very evil” about you? El-Sayed: Well, let me tell you what’s evil. Evil is the idea of starting wars when there is peace. Evil is the idea of stripping away people’s health care when they absolutely have no other option. What’s evil is to do that so that you can pass a tax cut for billionaires. What’s evil is putting a data center that people don’t want in their backyard despite them. What’s evil is corrupting yourself because you want a little bit more power… To come to Michigan from Ohio, where he's from, to tell us that we ought to pay for a vanity trade war, that his president is spiking with Canada. Well, that's a little bit beyond the pale, and I think he can go take himself back to Ohio, where apparently they like politics like that

Acyn

336,034 views • 1 month ago

In an interview with Good Morning Washington, East of Eden writer Zoe Kazan defends her choice of making Cathy Ames into a sympathetic character. "I'm just really curious about, like, well, what if we think of her not as the embodiment of evil but about a person who does really bad things? And I think we learn more about ourselves if we don't think about evil people as being that different from us." If evil people aren't that different from Zoe Kazan, then can we safely conclude that Zoe Kazan might just be evil? Poor Steinbeck tried to show us good and evil but didn't realize that evil people might just get their hands on his beloved novel.

In an interview with Good Morning Washington, East of Eden writer Zoe Kazan defends her choice of making Cathy Ames into a sympathetic character. "I'm just really curious about, like, well, what if we think of her not as the embodiment of evil but about a person who does really bad things? And I think we learn more about ourselves if we don't think about evil people as being that different from us." If evil people aren't that different from Zoe Kazan, then can we safely conclude that Zoe Kazan might just be evil? Poor Steinbeck tried to show us good and evil but didn't realize that evil people might just get their hands on his beloved novel.

Liza Libes

62,170 views • 29 days ago