正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Ex Wall Street Quant Explains

56,506 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

35 条评论

Ruben 的头像
Ruben5 个月前

“Tech earnings aren’t that good” Does he know theses companies are making billions per quarter in revenue?

Matthew Ray 的头像
Matthew Ray5 个月前

Is this rage bait? Tech earnings weren’t that good? Did you make this in March and post today? lol

Duc Luong 的头像
Duc Luong5 个月前

It’s all manipulation. Only the rich can tell all his friends to buy as he post war news to drive price cheaper.

Adolf Rizzler 的头像
Adolf Rizzler5 个月前

Moment I heard the news of U.S. bombing Iran I placed nearly everything into oil call options, markets can be timed

Crazed Capital 的头像
Crazed Capital5 个月前

This guy is a complete retard...the market goes up because the US money supply is going up at a rapid pace, and the US Treasury, banks and the Fed all have a vested interest and the technical capability to keep markets elevated... Its not that complicated...

Billy Ray Valentine 的头像
Billy Ray Valentine5 个月前

The market was driven up by war premiums, or an extended geopolitical event. The diesel crack spread has been above $30+ for weeks . No one thought institutional investors would take there securities away from the market. Now globally we have a thin market on every heat map.

MarketMindsetPro 的头像
MarketMindsetPro5 个月前

true

D.V.I. 的头像
D.V.I.5 个月前

With the closure of the strait of Hormuz, market fell 9%. So loss of 20% of global oil supply resulted in a 9% drawdown And with the straits still closed, inflation increasing, global yields exploding, the market suddenly increases 14%!? Risk is only to the upside in a Ponzi

Buffalofan 的头像
Buffalofan5 个月前

You’re right I’m gonna go take a dump right now

Tommy 的头像
Tommy5 个月前

The VIX was elevated for 4 months, grinding higher and higher. Everyone was bearish, volatility ran out of time. It never resulted in a sharp spike that translated into a deep correction. It was a carefully managed period of volatility just as much as this rally seems illogical.

Nunyabeeswax 的头像
Nunyabeeswax5 个月前

Tell us your shorts are getting killed without telling us. Rooting against the US OR Capitalism is for cucks.

Vaellene333 的头像
Vaellene3335 个月前

The war isn’t an issue

Jordan Davis 的头像
Jordan Davis5 个月前

Lotta nothing being said here

♛ Crypto ₿ull 𓄀 的头像
♛ Crypto ₿ull 𓄀5 个月前

In simple English It’s a rigged system and the market is heavily manipulated Stay away from the market over all, Market is getting bloody soon

Rajan Dhall MSTA 的头像
Rajan Dhall MSTA5 个月前

Personal opinion is that's not true. Markets price 3 or 6 months forward. What more could they know about that war. Or how much worse could it get? How many short sellers where left? That's the real reason. The market was trading at a discount based on what was going on.

Jeffrey (BullBearJeff) 的头像
Jeffrey (BullBearJeff)5 个月前

This is gold. 💯 @DexAust

Cubaron 的头像
Cubaron5 个月前

It’s a ponzy scheme a last man standing when the music stops playing

TitusPullo 的头像
TitusPullo5 个月前

my theory is simple. option dealers calculate the cost effectiveness of buying against the trend vs selling into it by how much premium they collected vs how much they would pay out if the trend continues. so under low volume it’s more cost effective and less risky to hold mor

Ben Bryan 的头像
Ben Bryan5 个月前

This is silly. The market sold off when the war started and the bombing was heaviest. The breadth got weak and the vix went high. HF had very light positioning. Perfect tinder for a rally. Then the major combat ended, Trump moved into negotiations phase. Hence rally!

TraderNorway 🇳🇴 🇮🇷 的头像
TraderNorway 🇳🇴 🇮🇷5 个月前

Thats a lot of words for explaining absolutely nothing 🤔

John bobson 的头像
John bobson5 个月前

Look at my quant. Do you notice anything about him?

Alex Ognara 的头像
Alex Ognara5 个月前

Now I know why he’s Ex Quant

BzB 的头像
BzB5 个月前

You were not a quant you don’t understand basics based on you biased wording. Markets are rallying up because earnings are good even though we have a war and oil prices up. You saying the tech stocks were down because of war is the irrational move this is actually rational.

The Panic 的头像
The Panic5 个月前

You lost me at “tech earnings aren’t that good“. Life’s too short to listen to stupid people .

Lit Nomad 的头像
Lit Nomad4 个月前

Thanks for sharing my content 👍

k 的头像
k5 个月前

Trumps friends are all in calls and market makers are about to liquidity sweep retail.

Some one, some day. 🇮🇱 的头像
Some one, some day. 🇮🇱5 个月前

That was perfect until the last sentence, which contradict the whole thing: "Once you see an environment where it's too obvious that you can time the market, you KNOW that there's gonna be a reversal." If we KNOW then we CAN time the market, don't we? Which means we won't know.

Deer Juice 的头像
Deer Juice5 个月前

It’s the idea of consensus trades that cannot possibly be right. They may be right initially, but they almost always fail ultimately.

Z 的头像
Z5 个月前

This taught me absolutely fucking nothing.

Osama_Ben_Biden 的头像
Osama_Ben_Biden5 个月前

Google just had a double digit growth at 21-22% A trillion $ company making startup growth And you say it's bad and the market is artificially growing ???

Chicken Sandwich 的头像
Chicken Sandwich5 个月前

He said absolutely nothing of value

commodiac 的头像
commodiac5 个月前

Nonsense

𓐬 ✞ NoblePhares ✞ 𓐬 的头像
𓐬 ✞ NoblePhares ✞ 𓐬5 个月前

What we know as a matter of fact is that the stock market has no breaks and market makers can print an unlimited number of naked shorts. When one gets sloppy creating and selling too many shares that it draws public outrage, they pay a few million dollar fine and simply keep the crime spree going. This proves the entire stock market is fake, it can only be moved by market makers and hedge funds, which effectively own and dilute every stock. I’ll go even further: the stock market was never a real market where the house doesn’t always win. When a company decides to go public, it “acquires” its shares from the NYSE, NasDaq, ICE etc.. where those exchanges pay the company upfront for every share, take ownership (control), and then list the receipts (fiat shares) to retail investors and family offices. Retail is therefore buying an already once-diluted share. Market makers and hedge funds then add unlimited further dilution whenever demand appears.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ while the price of a stock is carefully gauged via algorithms based on geoeconomics.

the war in chiraq 的头像
the war in chiraq5 个月前

Huh?!?

Gunther Loadimier 的头像
Gunther Loadimier5 个月前

you are only considering the strait being closed, but at the early point of the war there also was a ground invasion aspect. now, that has been minimized tremendously because Trump TACO has been fully exposed. the foundation of your entire theory is not sound

相关视频