Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Example number ONE: A lady called Godabai. Someone created fake logins, deleted 12 voters, and attempted to delete—because this attempt was stopped. Godabai, of course, has no idea. These were the cell phone numbers that were used to delete these people from voter list. These are not from Karnataka....

54,149 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Let's come to why I'm making such a direct accusation against the CEC, Gyanesh Kumar. There is an ongoing investigation on this matter in Karnataka. The CID of Karnataka has sent 18 letters in 18 months to the Election Commission. And they have asked the election commission for some very simple facts: 1) Give us the destination IP from where these forms were filled. 2) Give us the device destination ports from where these applications were filed. 3) Most importantly, give us the OTP trails—because when you file, you have to get an OTP. The CID of Karnataka has written to the Election Commission 18 times in 18 months, but they are not giving it. Why are they not giving it? Because this will lead us to where the operation is being done. And we are absolutely convinced where this is going to lead. I'll give you a little bit of the chronology: 👉 The FIR is filed on February 23. 👉 Karnataka CID writes to ECI requesting all details of these numbers and these transactions almost immediately in March. 👉 In August, EC gives the reply. It doesn't fulfil any of the demands and doesn't give us the information. It also doesn't give the CID of Karnataka the information that will lead them to their destination. 👉 On January 24, the Karnataka CID writes to the EC again and asks for full information. But it gets no answer from EC. 👉 Karnataka CID by September 25 has written 18 reminder letters. While this is going on, the CEC of Karnataka writes to the Election Commission in Delhi and says there is a matter. But he receives no answer. Now this is absolute solid proof that Gyanesh Kumar is protecting the people who are doing this. This is also absolute solid proof that I've shown you that this is being done in a centralized way, this is being done at scale, and this is being done using large resources. : LoP Shri Rahul Gandhi 📍 Delhi

Congress

30,131 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Why am I accusing CEC, Gyanesh Kumar directly? There is an ongoing investigation on this matter in Karnataka. The CID of Karnataka has sent 18 letters in 18 months to the Election Commission. And they have asked the election commission for some very simple facts: 1) Destination IP from where these forms were filled 2) Device destination ports from where these applications were filed. 3) OTP trails—because when you file, you have to get an OTP. Why is EC not giving these details? Because this will lead us to where the operation is being done. And we are absolutely convinced where this is going to lead. Chronology: 👉 The FIR is filed on February 23. 👉 Karnataka CID writes to ECI requesting all details of these numbers and these transactions almost immediately in March. 👉 In August, EC gives the reply. It doesn't fulfil any of the demands and doesn't give us the information. It also doesn't give the CID of Karnataka the information that will lead them to their destination. 👉 On January 24, the Karnataka CID writes to the EC again and asks for full information. But it gets no answer from EC. 👉 Karnataka CID by September 25 has written 18 reminder letters. While this is going on, the CEC of Karnataka writes to the Election Commission in Delhi and says there is a matter. But he receives no answer. Now this is absolute solid proof that Gyanesh Kumar is protecting the people who are doing this. This is also absolute solid proof that I've shown you that this is being done in a centralized way, this is being done at scale, and this is being done using large resources. Rahul Gandhi

Supriya Shrinate

75,655 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten