Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🚨 EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: PLAN TO “KILL TWITTER” EXPOSED! I sat down with Matt Taibi and Paul Thacker, the two investigative journalists behind the explosive leaks that revealed the “Kill Musk’s Twitter” plot. This web of deceit shockingly goes even deeper than the infamous Twitter Files and involves collusion between...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,751,856 subscribers

17,282,236 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Science & TechnologyNews & PoliticsComedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Comments

GnosisWolf's profile picture
GnosisWolf1 year ago

The war on freedom and truth needs everyone’s full commitment. No longer can “neutrals” stand by and watch tyrants tear apart our culture and constitution. Make a choice, to fight for truth, even if you don’t like “politics” Without the constitution…we are totally lost. 💯

Marauder Magazine's profile picture
Marauder Magazine1 year ago

The deep state plays dirty. They don't like it when people are a thorn in their side and make things hard for them. And most importantly, they don't like it when there's power given to the people. @elonmusk is essentially Prometheus of the internet!

𝗥𝗲𝗱𝗣𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁's profile picture
𝗥𝗲𝗱𝗣𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁1 year ago

The enemies of free speech are an evil lot. They’re well-funded, they are drunk with power, and they want to silence any dissent. We are in a war for freedom…and the enemies are the global elites who seek total control.

Camelia Marino's profile picture
Camelia Marino1 year ago

Stand for FREEDOM OF SPEECH STAND WITH FREE XXX VOTE 🗳️ DONALD TRUMP PROTECT ELON MUSK 🌹❤️🙏🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Neon_Oracle's profile picture
Neon_Oracle1 year ago

yep... CCDH stands for the Center for Countering Digital Hate. IT IS A NGO (NON-GOVERNMENT AGENCY FUNDED BY THE CURREENT ADMINISTRATION WITH OFFICES IN ENGLAND AND WASHINGTON DC. It is the governments way of doing things they can not do themselves without pre-approval by Congress. Why would they want to do this - fund someone who can do things that our government can't do themselves you may ask... Because they are illegal.

Tokens Magazine Charlene's profile picture
Tokens Magazine Charlene1 year ago

So many high up Organizations Behind “Kill Musk’s Twitter” Plot Thickens

Tracie Thimmes's profile picture
Tracie Thimmes1 year ago

Why would Soros purchase 200 radio stations?

The Celebrity Plumber's profile picture
The Celebrity Plumber1 year ago

They are getting desperate.

Safiullah's profile picture
Safiullah1 year ago

A new investigation reveals a deeper layer of collusion, as Matt Taibbi and Paul Thacker expose the "Kill Musk’s Twitter" plot involving a British organization and ties to the Biden/Harris campaign, raising further questions about the integrity of social media narratives.

Shawn Lindan's profile picture
Shawn Lindan1 year ago

This is like some shocking deep state activities you would see in a movie that Is actually happening in real life..

Related Videos

TV APPEARANCE: HOW 𝕏 IS TAKING ON THE EU This EU trip made one thing clear—the EU is in trouble. Big Tech censored. Governments controlled speech. The media lied. Democracy eroded. But with Elon and 𝕏, the fight for free speech isn’t over. I sat down with michal.rachon for an interview on Televizja Republika to discuss how 𝕏 has become a crucial tool in pushing back. The establishment tried to silence dissent—but the tide is turning. 01:43 – 24 BILLION Impressions: How 𝕏 now rivals CNN, Fox, and MSNBC. 03:25 – Twitter Files Bombshells: Smoking-gun proof that Twitter was a government censorship tool. 03:42 – The Deep State’s Social Media Takeover: “Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” 04:00 – How 𝕏 Fights Back: Community Notes vs. Media Lies. 05:04 – The “Kill Twitter” Conspiracy: Who really tried to shut down 𝕏? 06:05 – The War on Advertisers: How corporate blackmail backfired on 𝕏. 06:54 – Crowdfunding vs. Corporate Control: How Televizja Republika stays free. 07:26 – Crypto & Free Speech: Why governments fear decentralization. 08:28 – Bitcoin vs. The Banking System: The fight to end financial censorship. 10:10 – The Trust Factor: Bitcoin is NOT a Ponzi scheme—it’s the future. 11:30 – Trump & Bitcoin: Why Trump’s endorsement is shaking the system. 14:13 – The Crypto Revolution: Bringing ownership back to the people. 15:40 – AI Censorship Exposed: When ChatGPT refuses to answer political questions. 16:10 – Can Blockchain Fix AI Bias? The next war for free speech. 16:37 – The Centralization Crisis: A handful of companies control EVERYTHING. 18:40 – Elon’s Master Plan: How he’s outmaneuvering the establishment. 19:45 – Elon Musk ’s Bet on Trump: Why Elon went all-in on the election. 21:10 – The Final Message to Young Entrepreneurs: “This is the greatest moment in history to build something.”
22:23

TV APPEARANCE: HOW 𝕏 IS TAKING ON THE EU This EU trip made one thing clear—the EU is in trouble. Big Tech censored. Governments controlled speech. The media lied. Democracy eroded. But with Elon and 𝕏, the fight for free speech isn’t over. I sat down with michal.rachon for an interview on Televizja Republika to discuss how 𝕏 has become a crucial tool in pushing back. The establishment tried to silence dissent—but the tide is turning. 01:43 – 24 BILLION Impressions: How 𝕏 now rivals CNN, Fox, and MSNBC. 03:25 – Twitter Files Bombshells: Smoking-gun proof that Twitter was a government censorship tool. 03:42 – The Deep State’s Social Media Takeover: “Absolute power corrupts absolutely.” 04:00 – How 𝕏 Fights Back: Community Notes vs. Media Lies. 05:04 – The “Kill Twitter” Conspiracy: Who really tried to shut down 𝕏? 06:05 – The War on Advertisers: How corporate blackmail backfired on 𝕏. 06:54 – Crowdfunding vs. Corporate Control: How Televizja Republika stays free. 07:26 – Crypto & Free Speech: Why governments fear decentralization. 08:28 – Bitcoin vs. The Banking System: The fight to end financial censorship. 10:10 – The Trust Factor: Bitcoin is NOT a Ponzi scheme—it’s the future. 11:30 – Trump & Bitcoin: Why Trump’s endorsement is shaking the system. 14:13 – The Crypto Revolution: Bringing ownership back to the people. 15:40 – AI Censorship Exposed: When ChatGPT refuses to answer political questions. 16:10 – Can Blockchain Fix AI Bias? The next war for free speech. 16:37 – The Centralization Crisis: A handful of companies control EVERYTHING. 18:40 – Elon’s Master Plan: How he’s outmaneuvering the establishment. 19:45 – Elon Musk ’s Bet on Trump: Why Elon went all-in on the election. 21:10 – The Final Message to Young Entrepreneurs: “This is the greatest moment in history to build something.”

Mario Nawfal

3,721,828 views • 1 year ago

Jonathan Turley reveals how Hillary Clinton directly targeted Elon Musk, urging the EU to weaponize their censorship apparatus of the Digital Services Act to force censorship on X and American citizens after Musk bought Twitter to restore free speech. After Elon Musk purchased Twitter and dismantled previous censorship systems embedded within the platform, Hillary Clinton called on the EU to deploy one of the most anti-free speech laws in decade to try and bully Elon into censoring accounts on 𝕏 that are exposing Truth, threatening extreme fines for Elon refusing. Hillary Clinton, a former presidential candidate, tried to bypass our First Amendment rights and protections by outsourcing censorship to a foreign government full of globalists, to censor conservative accounts ahead of the 2024 presidential election with candidate Donald Trump. That's election interference — which is TREASON! "When Twitter was purchased by Elon Musk, she called on the EU to use the infamous Digital Services Act... to force the censorship of American citizens, force people like Musk to censor!"
1:59

Jonathan Turley reveals how Hillary Clinton directly targeted Elon Musk, urging the EU to weaponize their censorship apparatus of the Digital Services Act to force censorship on X and American citizens after Musk bought Twitter to restore free speech. After Elon Musk purchased Twitter and dismantled previous censorship systems embedded within the platform, Hillary Clinton called on the EU to deploy one of the most anti-free speech laws in decade to try and bully Elon into censoring accounts on 𝕏 that are exposing Truth, threatening extreme fines for Elon refusing. Hillary Clinton, a former presidential candidate, tried to bypass our First Amendment rights and protections by outsourcing censorship to a foreign government full of globalists, to censor conservative accounts ahead of the 2024 presidential election with candidate Donald Trump. That's election interference — which is TREASON! "When Twitter was purchased by Elon Musk, she called on the EU to use the infamous Digital Services Act... to force the censorship of American citizens, force people like Musk to censor!"

Bridgett Fertig

46,281 views • 3 months ago

yesterday i visited Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 for some tea, to play with rabbits and to get political. from the tech right to old twitter vs elon twitter to anthropic vs DoW, we talked about the politics of tech and AI and where it might be headed 01:50 - The tech right 06:15 - Tech leaders and their relationship with Trump 07:55 - Elon Musk’s understanding of American Politics 11:45 - Australia attacking rabbits with bioweapons 15:00 - Old Twitter vs Elon Twitter 21:55 - Is X dot com dying? 27:40 - Why important people are falling off of X 29:27 - Anthropic vs DoW and AI Messaging 32:47 - Dean W. Ball vs Ben Thompson 33:18 - Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 reaction 36:14 - What Anthropic thinks 38:05 - Trying to remember what Alex Karp said
43:39

yesterday i visited Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼 for some tea, to play with rabbits and to get political. from the tech right to old twitter vs elon twitter to anthropic vs DoW, we talked about the politics of tech and AI and where it might be headed 01:50 - The tech right 06:15 - Tech leaders and their relationship with Trump 07:55 - Elon Musk’s understanding of American Politics 11:45 - Australia attacking rabbits with bioweapons 15:00 - Old Twitter vs Elon Twitter 21:55 - Is X dot com dying? 27:40 - Why important people are falling off of X 29:27 - Anthropic vs DoW and AI Messaging 32:47 - Dean W. Ball vs Ben Thompson 33:18 - Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 reaction 36:14 - What Anthropic thinks 38:05 - Trying to remember what Alex Karp said

atlas

51,433 views • 5 months ago

NEW: Victoria Nuland makes sweeping allegations about Russian election interference, implicates Elon Musk — “[Putin’s] also got a brand new, very, very powerful tool, which is Elon Musk and 𝕏." Nuland openly longs for the days of US Govt/Twitter 1.0 censorship collusion: “In 2020, the social media companies worked hard with the U.S. government to try to do content moderation, to try to catch this stuff as it was happening. But, this time we have Elon Musk talking directly to the Kremlin and ensuring that every time the Russians put out something like this, it gets 5 million views on X before anybody can catch it." "But clearly [Putin’s] interfering in our election, and Musk is helping him, and Musk is also helping Trump. So now you have this, triumvirate all on the same team." Free speech on 𝕏 is under constant assault — their information monopoly has been destroyed in an election cycle — and they desperately want the Twitter 1.0 censorship regime back.
2:22

NEW: Victoria Nuland makes sweeping allegations about Russian election interference, implicates Elon Musk — “[Putin’s] also got a brand new, very, very powerful tool, which is Elon Musk and 𝕏." Nuland openly longs for the days of US Govt/Twitter 1.0 censorship collusion: “In 2020, the social media companies worked hard with the U.S. government to try to do content moderation, to try to catch this stuff as it was happening. But, this time we have Elon Musk talking directly to the Kremlin and ensuring that every time the Russians put out something like this, it gets 5 million views on X before anybody can catch it." "But clearly [Putin’s] interfering in our election, and Musk is helping him, and Musk is also helping Trump. So now you have this, triumvirate all on the same team." Free speech on 𝕏 is under constant assault — their information monopoly has been destroyed in an election cycle — and they desperately want the Twitter 1.0 censorship regime back.

Western Lensman

433,586 views • 1 year ago

Joe Rogan and Matt Taibbi talk about the public smear campaign against Elon Musk for reinstalling freedom of speech on Twitter: ROGAN: "I don't think anybody ever anticipated that Twitter would get sold to an eccentric billionaire who is intent on letting all the information get released." TAIBBI: "Elon Musk essentially spent $44 billion to become a whistleblower of his own company... I think he's got a pretty developed sense of humor. He gets a kick out of seeing all this stuff come out on Twitter." ROGAN: "He truly believes that censored social media is a threat to democracy... And I believe it too. I just don't have $44 billion, and even if I did, I would be like, ahh, I don't want that heat." TAIBBI: "He also believes the credibility of these companies can only be restored by telling people what they have been talking about in private with the government." ROGAN: "The publicity campaign against him has been fascinating to watch people go from thinking Elon Musk is this savior that's bringing us these amazing electric cars and engineering new renewable rockets to he's an alt-right piece of sh*t." TAIBBI: "The speed with which they can sort of shuffle somebody into the Hitler of the month club routine, right? ...He went from being the guy who made electric cars sexy to something to the right of Viktor Orbán in ten seconds. It's amazing." 😂😂😂 Elon Musk Joe Rogan Matt Taibbi
3:55

Joe Rogan and Matt Taibbi talk about the public smear campaign against Elon Musk for reinstalling freedom of speech on Twitter: ROGAN: "I don't think anybody ever anticipated that Twitter would get sold to an eccentric billionaire who is intent on letting all the information get released." TAIBBI: "Elon Musk essentially spent $44 billion to become a whistleblower of his own company... I think he's got a pretty developed sense of humor. He gets a kick out of seeing all this stuff come out on Twitter." ROGAN: "He truly believes that censored social media is a threat to democracy... And I believe it too. I just don't have $44 billion, and even if I did, I would be like, ahh, I don't want that heat." TAIBBI: "He also believes the credibility of these companies can only be restored by telling people what they have been talking about in private with the government." ROGAN: "The publicity campaign against him has been fascinating to watch people go from thinking Elon Musk is this savior that's bringing us these amazing electric cars and engineering new renewable rockets to he's an alt-right piece of sh*t." TAIBBI: "The speed with which they can sort of shuffle somebody into the Hitler of the month club routine, right? ...He went from being the guy who made electric cars sexy to something to the right of Viktor Orbán in ten seconds. It's amazing." 😂😂😂 Elon Musk Joe Rogan Matt Taibbi

KanekoaTheGreat

4,504,561 views • 3 years ago

We Exposed Censorship By Brazil’s Supreme Court, And Now President Lula Is Persecuting Me PLUS: Brazil’s Attorney General Is Seeking To Entirely Shut Down X, Formerly Known As Twitter Thirty years ago this year, I asked Brazil’s current president, who goes by the single name “Lula,” if he would turn his country into Cuba, complete with censorship. He said "no" and that he and the Brazilian people loved their freedom too much. At no point since then did I ever imagine that I would be the victim of Cuba-style censorship and repression at the hands of Lula . And yet, that is precisely what is happening. All of this is happening at the same time that Brazil’s Attorney General and Supreme Court are reportedly seeking a way to entirely shut down X, Brazil’s only free speech platform. The Brazilian government recently retaliated against X by cutting off advertising on X. X’s top attorney in Brazil resigned to protect his safety less than two weeks ago. Yesterday, Brazil’s attorney general, Jorge Messias, urged the Supreme Court to pursue “criminal prosecution” and investigation to “identify and punish the possible culprits.” My alleged crime was publishing the “Twitter Files - Brazil.” At no point does the Attorney General suggest that either I or my coauthors Eli Vieira and David Ágape lied or presented inaccurate information in the Twitter Files - Brazil. Rather, the Attorney General office’s six-page memo, released publicly, claims that I released “excerpts of content from confidential judicial decisions” in an “attempt to destabilize the democratic state.” This is untrue. None of the Twitter Files - Brazil contained “confidential judicial decisions.” The Twitter Files - Brazil were strictly emails between Twitter staff. There is not a single instance where we published “confidential judicial decisions.” But even if we had, the Brazilian constitution says, “the law may only restrict the publicity of procedural acts when the defense of privacy or social interests so require" (Article 5, LX). In this case, it was imperative that we publish the Twitter Files precisely to protect the public’s right to privacy, freedom of speech, and democracy. What’s more, the attack on me is highly selective. Brazilian news media have, for years, reported on confidential judiciary decisions and have not been subjected to such an outrageous criminal investigation as the one I am under. Finally, there is no law against attempting to “destabilize the democratic state” through non-violent methods. The law only prohibits violent attacks on democracy. As such, the Attorney General abuses his powers and acts as a lawmaker, usurping Brazil’s Congress. And just imagine if Brazil criminalized something as vague as “destabilizing the democratic state.” Such a law would allow President Lula to lock up nonviolent protesters, journalists, and his political rivals. Why is the Attorney General doing this? The first thing to understand is
2:59

We Exposed Censorship By Brazil’s Supreme Court, And Now President Lula Is Persecuting Me PLUS: Brazil’s Attorney General Is Seeking To Entirely Shut Down X, Formerly Known As Twitter Thirty years ago this year, I asked Brazil’s current president, who goes by the single name “Lula,” if he would turn his country into Cuba, complete with censorship. He said "no" and that he and the Brazilian people loved their freedom too much. At no point since then did I ever imagine that I would be the victim of Cuba-style censorship and repression at the hands of Lula . And yet, that is precisely what is happening. All of this is happening at the same time that Brazil’s Attorney General and Supreme Court are reportedly seeking a way to entirely shut down X, Brazil’s only free speech platform. The Brazilian government recently retaliated against X by cutting off advertising on X. X’s top attorney in Brazil resigned to protect his safety less than two weeks ago. Yesterday, Brazil’s attorney general, Jorge Messias, urged the Supreme Court to pursue “criminal prosecution” and investigation to “identify and punish the possible culprits.” My alleged crime was publishing the “Twitter Files - Brazil.” At no point does the Attorney General suggest that either I or my coauthors Eli Vieira and David Ágape lied or presented inaccurate information in the Twitter Files - Brazil. Rather, the Attorney General office’s six-page memo, released publicly, claims that I released “excerpts of content from confidential judicial decisions” in an “attempt to destabilize the democratic state.” This is untrue. None of the Twitter Files - Brazil contained “confidential judicial decisions.” The Twitter Files - Brazil were strictly emails between Twitter staff. There is not a single instance where we published “confidential judicial decisions.” But even if we had, the Brazilian constitution says, “the law may only restrict the publicity of procedural acts when the defense of privacy or social interests so require" (Article 5, LX). In this case, it was imperative that we publish the Twitter Files precisely to protect the public’s right to privacy, freedom of speech, and democracy. What’s more, the attack on me is highly selective. Brazilian news media have, for years, reported on confidential judiciary decisions and have not been subjected to such an outrageous criminal investigation as the one I am under. Finally, there is no law against attempting to “destabilize the democratic state” through non-violent methods. The law only prohibits violent attacks on democracy. As such, the Attorney General abuses his powers and acts as a lawmaker, usurping Brazil’s Congress. And just imagine if Brazil criminalized something as vague as “destabilizing the democratic state.” Such a law would allow President Lula to lock up nonviolent protesters, journalists, and his political rivals. Why is the Attorney General doing this? The first thing to understand is

Michael Shellenberger

2,484,744 views • 2 years ago

🚨BREAKING: SEC SUES ELON IN TWITTER STOCK PURCHASE CASE Another witch-hunt has started. The SEC, which has been investigating Elon’s 2022 purchase of Twitter shares, is now suing to force him to testify and comply with their subpoena. This is yet another attack on Elon by the ‘alphabet organizations’. Here are a few of the others: 1. TESLA: The DOJ and the SEC claimed Musk used millions of dollars from Tesla to secretly build himself a ‘spacious glass structure’ labeled as 'House for CEO Elon Musk.' (Not making this up) Elon replied: “This is one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard. Where is this house!? Metaphors don’t count!” 2. X/TWITTER: X got in trouble with the Biden Administration after refusing to hand over Trump’s personal Twitter data and information to prosecutors. The information included: - Trump’s use of the account, - Whether others had access to it - Whether he might have written draft tweets that he left unposted. Twitter initially resisted complying with the search warrant, arguing that the order violated Trump’s constitutional right to free speech. This resulted in a federal judge holding the company in contempt and fining it $350,000. 3. SPACE X: The DOJ sued SpaceX for discriminating against refugees in the company’s hiring process. They claim the company discourages refugees from applying for positions, giving their applications unfair consideration and refusing to hire them even if they were deemed qualified applicants. Yep, SpaceX was attacked by the DOJ for not hiring enough Americans. What’s ironic is that the DOJ is rarely allowed to hire non-Americans. Why did all these attacks begin after Elon Musk acquired X and began his fight for Freedom of Speech?
1:01

🚨BREAKING: SEC SUES ELON IN TWITTER STOCK PURCHASE CASE Another witch-hunt has started. The SEC, which has been investigating Elon’s 2022 purchase of Twitter shares, is now suing to force him to testify and comply with their subpoena. This is yet another attack on Elon by the ‘alphabet organizations’. Here are a few of the others: 1. TESLA: The DOJ and the SEC claimed Musk used millions of dollars from Tesla to secretly build himself a ‘spacious glass structure’ labeled as 'House for CEO Elon Musk.' (Not making this up) Elon replied: “This is one of the funniest things I’ve ever heard. Where is this house!? Metaphors don’t count!” 2. X/TWITTER: X got in trouble with the Biden Administration after refusing to hand over Trump’s personal Twitter data and information to prosecutors. The information included: - Trump’s use of the account, - Whether others had access to it - Whether he might have written draft tweets that he left unposted. Twitter initially resisted complying with the search warrant, arguing that the order violated Trump’s constitutional right to free speech. This resulted in a federal judge holding the company in contempt and fining it $350,000. 3. SPACE X: The DOJ sued SpaceX for discriminating against refugees in the company’s hiring process. They claim the company discourages refugees from applying for positions, giving their applications unfair consideration and refusing to hire them even if they were deemed qualified applicants. Yep, SpaceX was attacked by the DOJ for not hiring enough Americans. What’s ironic is that the DOJ is rarely allowed to hire non-Americans. Why did all these attacks begin after Elon Musk acquired X and began his fight for Freedom of Speech?

Mario Nawfal

1,106,323 views • 2 years ago

BRAZIL IS ON THE BRINK I’m reporting to you from Brazil, where a dramatic series of events are underway. At 5:52 pm Eastern Time, today, April 6, 2024, X corporation, formerly known as Twitter, announced that a Brazilian court had forced it to “block certain popular accounts in Brazil.” Then, less than one hour later, the owner of X, Elon Musk announced that X would defy the court’s order, and lift all restrictions. “As a result,” said Musk, “we will probably lose all revenue in Brazil and have to shut down our office there. But principles matter more than profit.” At any moment, Brazil’s Supreme Court could shut off all access to X/Twitter for the people of Brazil. It is not an exaggeration to say that Brazil is on the brink of dictatorship at the hands of a totalitarian Supreme Court Justice named Alexandre de Moraes. President Lula da Silva is participating in the push toward totalitarianism. Since taking office, Lula has massively increased government funding of the mainstream news media, most of which are encouraging increased censorship. What Lula and de Moraes are doing is an outrageous violation of Brazil’s constitution and the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. At this moment, Brazil is not yet a dictatorship. It still has elections and the Brazilian people have other means at their disposal to confront authoritarianism. But the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Electoral Court are directly interfere in those elections through censorship. Three days ago I published the Twitter Files for Brazil. They show that Moraes has violated the Brazilian Constitution. Moraes illegally demanded that Twitter reveal private information about Twitter users who used hashtags he considered inappropriate. He demanded access to Twitter's internal data, violating the platform's policy. He censored, on his own initiative and without any respect for due process, posts on Twitter by parliamentarians from the Brazilian Congress. And Moraes tried to turn Twitter's content moderation policies into a weapon against supporters of then-president Jair Bolsonaro. I say this as an independent and non-partisan journalist. I'm not a fan of either Bolsonaro or Trump. My political views are very moderate. But I know censorship when I see it. The Twitter Files also revealed that Google, Facebook, Uber, WhatsApp and Instagram betrayed the people of Brazil. If such evidence is proven, the executives of these companies behaved like cowards: they provided the Brazilian government with personal registration data and telephone numbers without a court order and, therefore, violating the law. When Twitter refused to provide Brazilian authorities with private user information, including direct messages, the government attempted to sue Twitter's top Brazilian lawyer. When I lived in Brazil in 1992, I was very left-wing. At the time, Lula and the PT's slogans were “Without fear of being happy”. In recent days, I have spoken to dozens of Brazilians, including professors, journalists and respected lawyers. Everyone tells me they are shocked by what is happening. They told me that they are afraid to speak their mind and that the Lula government is complicit in creating this climate of fear. Brazil belongs to the Brazilians. It is not my country. As such, there are limits to what I am capable of doing. But I can say things that many Brazilians do not feel safe saying: Alexandre de Moraes is a tyrant. And the only way to deal with tyrants is to confront them. It is up to Brazil’s senators to confront the tyrant. And it is up to the people of Brazil to demand that their senators do so.
4:14

BRAZIL IS ON THE BRINK I’m reporting to you from Brazil, where a dramatic series of events are underway. At 5:52 pm Eastern Time, today, April 6, 2024, X corporation, formerly known as Twitter, announced that a Brazilian court had forced it to “block certain popular accounts in Brazil.” Then, less than one hour later, the owner of X, Elon Musk announced that X would defy the court’s order, and lift all restrictions. “As a result,” said Musk, “we will probably lose all revenue in Brazil and have to shut down our office there. But principles matter more than profit.” At any moment, Brazil’s Supreme Court could shut off all access to X/Twitter for the people of Brazil. It is not an exaggeration to say that Brazil is on the brink of dictatorship at the hands of a totalitarian Supreme Court Justice named Alexandre de Moraes. President Lula da Silva is participating in the push toward totalitarianism. Since taking office, Lula has massively increased government funding of the mainstream news media, most of which are encouraging increased censorship. What Lula and de Moraes are doing is an outrageous violation of Brazil’s constitution and the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. At this moment, Brazil is not yet a dictatorship. It still has elections and the Brazilian people have other means at their disposal to confront authoritarianism. But the Federal Supreme Court and the Superior Electoral Court are directly interfere in those elections through censorship. Three days ago I published the Twitter Files for Brazil. They show that Moraes has violated the Brazilian Constitution. Moraes illegally demanded that Twitter reveal private information about Twitter users who used hashtags he considered inappropriate. He demanded access to Twitter's internal data, violating the platform's policy. He censored, on his own initiative and without any respect for due process, posts on Twitter by parliamentarians from the Brazilian Congress. And Moraes tried to turn Twitter's content moderation policies into a weapon against supporters of then-president Jair Bolsonaro. I say this as an independent and non-partisan journalist. I'm not a fan of either Bolsonaro or Trump. My political views are very moderate. But I know censorship when I see it. The Twitter Files also revealed that Google, Facebook, Uber, WhatsApp and Instagram betrayed the people of Brazil. If such evidence is proven, the executives of these companies behaved like cowards: they provided the Brazilian government with personal registration data and telephone numbers without a court order and, therefore, violating the law. When Twitter refused to provide Brazilian authorities with private user information, including direct messages, the government attempted to sue Twitter's top Brazilian lawyer. When I lived in Brazil in 1992, I was very left-wing. At the time, Lula and the PT's slogans were “Without fear of being happy”. In recent days, I have spoken to dozens of Brazilians, including professors, journalists and respected lawyers. Everyone tells me they are shocked by what is happening. They told me that they are afraid to speak their mind and that the Lula government is complicit in creating this climate of fear. Brazil belongs to the Brazilians. It is not my country. As such, there are limits to what I am capable of doing. But I can say things that many Brazilians do not feel safe saying: Alexandre de Moraes is a tyrant. And the only way to deal with tyrants is to confront them. It is up to Brazil’s senators to confront the tyrant. And it is up to the people of Brazil to demand that their senators do so.

Michael Shellenberger

33,888,403 views • 2 years ago

🚨🇺🇸 DOJ CIVIL RIGHTS CHIEF: IF ELON HADN'T BOUGHT TWITTER, CALIFORNIA'S $25 MILLION CENSORSHIP SCHEME WOULD STILL BE RUNNING Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon revealed the massive government-funded censorship operation targeting conservative Twitter accounts, crediting Elon's acquisition as the only reason the coordinated suppression ended: "I represented DC Drano, a very popular conservative account removed from Twitter for years. Through document requests, we found the National Association of Secretaries of State was working hand in hand with Democrat Secretaries of State, including California's, and so-called nonprofits like Stanford Observatory getting federal funding. A Democrat consulting firm, S.K.D. Knickerbocker, was paid $25 million by California to analyze who's saying wrong things on the internet and how can we make them stop? It started COVID related, election related, then became any wrongthink. If Elon Musk hadn't bought Twitter, it would still be going on there." California spent $25 million in taxpayer money to have a consulting firm hunt down and flag "wrongthink" on social media for censorship. This wasn't just Big Tech acting alone, it was a coordinated government operation using universities and NGOs as cutouts. Without Elon's $44 billion purchase, none of this would have ever been exposed. Source: PodForce 1 Podcast / Elon Musk
3:55

🚨🇺🇸 DOJ CIVIL RIGHTS CHIEF: IF ELON HADN'T BOUGHT TWITTER, CALIFORNIA'S $25 MILLION CENSORSHIP SCHEME WOULD STILL BE RUNNING Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon revealed the massive government-funded censorship operation targeting conservative Twitter accounts, crediting Elon's acquisition as the only reason the coordinated suppression ended: "I represented DC Drano, a very popular conservative account removed from Twitter for years. Through document requests, we found the National Association of Secretaries of State was working hand in hand with Democrat Secretaries of State, including California's, and so-called nonprofits like Stanford Observatory getting federal funding. A Democrat consulting firm, S.K.D. Knickerbocker, was paid $25 million by California to analyze who's saying wrong things on the internet and how can we make them stop? It started COVID related, election related, then became any wrongthink. If Elon Musk hadn't bought Twitter, it would still be going on there." California spent $25 million in taxpayer money to have a consulting firm hunt down and flag "wrongthink" on social media for censorship. This wasn't just Big Tech acting alone, it was a coordinated government operation using universities and NGOs as cutouts. Without Elon's $44 billion purchase, none of this would have ever been exposed. Source: PodForce 1 Podcast / Elon Musk

Mario Nawfal

25,478 views • 8 months ago

JOE ROGAN: WHEN ELON PURCHASED TWITTER, HE CHANGED THE COURSE OF CIVILIZATION "I don’t say this lightly, I think he changed the course of civilization. I really do. I think we were on our way to this weird dystopian censorship complex that was already moving We had already had intelligence agencies that were contacting Twitter we know this through the Twitter Files and they were banning certain people that weren’t saying incorrect things, but they were saying things that were inconvenient And they turned out to all be accurate. All the things that they were warning about, all the things that they were saying, all turned out to be accurate They stopped the distribution of the Hunter Biden laptop story by the New York Post. The New York Post! The second-oldest newspaper in America It’s a huge newspaper. To stop that from being able to be distributed on Twitter, which turned out to be a totally accurate story, is wild. That is scary stuff If Elon didn’t purchase Twitter, we would have just had to deal with that kind of stuff. And it would accelerate; it wouldn’t stay where it is It would ramp up, it would get more [extreme]. They started using the term 'malinformation.' So there’s misinformation, disinformation, and then malinformation. Malinformation is factual information that might cause harm"
1:22

JOE ROGAN: WHEN ELON PURCHASED TWITTER, HE CHANGED THE COURSE OF CIVILIZATION "I don’t say this lightly, I think he changed the course of civilization. I really do. I think we were on our way to this weird dystopian censorship complex that was already moving We had already had intelligence agencies that were contacting Twitter we know this through the Twitter Files and they were banning certain people that weren’t saying incorrect things, but they were saying things that were inconvenient And they turned out to all be accurate. All the things that they were warning about, all the things that they were saying, all turned out to be accurate They stopped the distribution of the Hunter Biden laptop story by the New York Post. The New York Post! The second-oldest newspaper in America It’s a huge newspaper. To stop that from being able to be distributed on Twitter, which turned out to be a totally accurate story, is wild. That is scary stuff If Elon didn’t purchase Twitter, we would have just had to deal with that kind of stuff. And it would accelerate; it wouldn’t stay where it is It would ramp up, it would get more [extreme]. They started using the term 'malinformation.' So there’s misinformation, disinformation, and then malinformation. Malinformation is factual information that might cause harm"

X Freeze

22,749 views • 6 months ago

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Elon Musk Dropped the Twitter Files On the World Against the advice of his attorneys, Elon Musk dumped a trove of Twitter documents onto journalists, revealing government collusion to censor speech. When Kennedy asked Musk why he did that, Elon replied: “I grew up in South Africa. I moved here, and I moved here partially because of the First Amendment because I love the freedom of this country. I’m a citizen of this country now. I have a lot of money. I could buy houses all over the world. I don’t. Everything I own is here. I want this country to be what it’s supposed to be.” Reflecting on the situation, Robert F. Kennedy Jr said, “I will always love Elon because he did that. It was such a bold, brazen move ... Because of what he did, which is to release all these documents ... we know what was happening (White House ordering social media companies to censor speech). Otherwise, we wouldn’t know anything about it.”
2:54

RFK Jr. Reveals Why Elon Musk Dropped the Twitter Files On the World Against the advice of his attorneys, Elon Musk dumped a trove of Twitter documents onto journalists, revealing government collusion to censor speech. When Kennedy asked Musk why he did that, Elon replied: “I grew up in South Africa. I moved here, and I moved here partially because of the First Amendment because I love the freedom of this country. I’m a citizen of this country now. I have a lot of money. I could buy houses all over the world. I don’t. Everything I own is here. I want this country to be what it’s supposed to be.” Reflecting on the situation, Robert F. Kennedy Jr said, “I will always love Elon because he did that. It was such a bold, brazen move ... Because of what he did, which is to release all these documents ... we know what was happening (White House ordering social media companies to censor speech). Otherwise, we wouldn’t know anything about it.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,497,029 views • 2 years ago

According to the Progress Action Fund, Twitter banned the following political ad that they had placed on Twitter/X, and then their account was shadow banned. The ad below, entitled “Republicans In Your Bedroom,” which PAF says was intended for the August 8 election in Ohio was taken down, according to the group. Progress Action Fund believes this ad was taken down due to Elon Musk having a “far-right political agenda.” I decided to check the Twitter ad policy, and that policy does say that the promotion of “adult sexual content” is not permitted. Some of the examples of of this content would include the following: •Full and partial nudity •Modeled clothing that is sexual in nature I think that perhaps this ad could be deemed to fall under the second bullet point, but I believe that would be quite a reach. That would mean that virtually all swimwear ads would also be prohibited. I think Twiitter/X owes an explanation for this. Was this ad really banned? If so, why? Also why is the aforementioned account shadow banned (if that is true)? What are everyone’s thoughts? Should this ad be permitted on Twitter? If not, why not?
0:28

According to the Progress Action Fund, Twitter banned the following political ad that they had placed on Twitter/X, and then their account was shadow banned. The ad below, entitled “Republicans In Your Bedroom,” which PAF says was intended for the August 8 election in Ohio was taken down, according to the group. Progress Action Fund believes this ad was taken down due to Elon Musk having a “far-right political agenda.” I decided to check the Twitter ad policy, and that policy does say that the promotion of “adult sexual content” is not permitted. Some of the examples of of this content would include the following: •Full and partial nudity •Modeled clothing that is sexual in nature I think that perhaps this ad could be deemed to fall under the second bullet point, but I believe that would be quite a reach. That would mean that virtually all swimwear ads would also be prohibited. I think Twiitter/X owes an explanation for this. Was this ad really banned? If so, why? Also why is the aforementioned account shadow banned (if that is true)? What are everyone’s thoughts? Should this ad be permitted on Twitter? If not, why not?

Ed Krassenstein

3,152,101 views • 3 years ago