正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

ex-Google David Soares reveals that only three entities on earth could hack any device through a single web page: Mossad, the NSA, and Claude Mythos "One of the holy grails of hacking is, can you make a website where if you just look at the website, I get full...

firesidealpha's profile picture

Fireside Alpha

20,399 subscribers

80,906 次观看 • 14 天前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

4 条评论

AI Mastery Guide 的头像
AI Mastery Guide14 天前

Claude Mythos in that list is wild

elsa 的头像
elsa14 天前

The two largest closed AI companies are urging govt to slow down AI development. I agree with those who argue that this is an attempt to slow down their competitors. The real and immediate danger is not AI itself, but AI being controlled and managed by people driven by greed.

PatD 的头像
PatD14 天前

They’re scared because AI gives us at least somewhat of an advantage …levels the playing field for all in some ways. Certainly knowledge wise.

Schrodinger's Cockatoo 的头像
Schrodinger's Cockatoo14 天前

"could hack any device through a single web page: Mossad, the NSA, and Claude Mythos" What web page?

相关视频

Hero–Doctor Kirk Moore, who's now facing 35 years in prison, defends his decision to give saline injections instead of COVID death jabs: "What law did I break?.... [there was] no ingredient list... no toxicity studies... [the jabs were] studied for a total of two months." This clip of board-certified plastic surgeon Dr. Kirk Moore (@Moore22K) is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) posted to Rumble on June 10, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So my one position that I've said all along is, what law did I break? There is no law. There was no Covid law passed. There was no. Nothing that said that I had to do whatever the government says that I need to do. There's no law that says that. And the government is trying to kind of put me into this fraud side, like you said, you know, saying I. That I absconded or I misused or I purloined, you know, $28,000, $28,800 worth of product that they gave me for free and that, you know, that I had a contract with them to give it in such a way. So, I think that's, you know, that That's That's the law side of it. "The ethical side of it wasn't that hard for me. I'm doing what my patients wanted me to do. After a full discussion of what it is. I, have no ingredient list. I don't know what this product is. There are no toxicity studies. There are no carcinogenic, you know, carcinogenic studies. There are no mutagenic studies. There's nothing out there. This is something that was studied for a total of two months. "And the control group was. Was terminated, because they found that it had 95% effectiveness. Once the numbers came out and it showed that that actual effectiveness was less than 1%, by an absolute risk reduction, then that in and of itself should prove, you know, should show that, hey, this is just ridiculous. There was no benefit. There's nothing out there. "You know, you look at Brook Jackson's study and what it was that she was, you know, that she's tried to present in Texas. That's been thrown out, at least twice now. And you just look at all of the. Everything that's behind it. You know, you mentioned, you know, the ethical side of it. You know, the AMA code of ethics says that a physician is supposed to take care of the patient that's in front of them. Okay? That's your oath. My oath is if you were my patient, I would take care of you. You tell me what your concerns are, you tell me, you know, what your symptoms are, and we come up with a plan. I explain to you what the pros and cons of that are, and then you and I come up with a plan on how to treat you. "And I'm not treating you for your husband or your kids or your neighbors or anybody else. I'm treating you that's in front of you. Okay, that's in front of me. And we come up with a plan. So that's the code of ethics. "There's also a known issue with medicine and the legal system. And the, again, the AMA code of ethics says two things. We know that there is going to be a conflict between ethical and moral medical treatment of people and the law at times. And so as a physician, your duty is to try to do what you can, to do both to take care of your patient and to kind of reconcile the law. "So I did. I went to the state of Utah, I went to the House, I went to some of the Senate subcommittees, I, I was, I testified in some of these committee hearings, to try to get laws changed, mandate laws, mask mandates, Covid mandates, shot mandates. And we were successful. In the state of Utah, we were able to pass laws, that reversed the mask mandates. That made it actually, to some degree, a fineable offense for businesses to require Covid vaccines in order to go to work and to go to school. "And so that was my first step. The second step out of this is that if you cannot change that during the time that you're doing, you are, by ethics and moral values, you are required to take care of your patient in front of you, not to abide by, like you said, to abide by the law. So where is the AMA and all this? That's their code of ethics. I don't see them standing behind me and, you know, and trying to support the medical values and ethics that they, that, you know, that they claim on their website is one of, you know, one of their, you know, bastions of health and what physicians need to do."
4:25

Hero–Doctor Kirk Moore, who's now facing 35 years in prison, defends his decision to give saline injections instead of COVID death jabs: "What law did I break?.... [there was] no ingredient list... no toxicity studies... [the jabs were] studied for a total of two months." This clip of board-certified plastic surgeon Dr. Kirk Moore (@Moore22K) is taken from an interview with Shannon Joy (Shannon Joy) posted to Rumble on June 10, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So my one position that I've said all along is, what law did I break? There is no law. There was no Covid law passed. There was no. Nothing that said that I had to do whatever the government says that I need to do. There's no law that says that. And the government is trying to kind of put me into this fraud side, like you said, you know, saying I. That I absconded or I misused or I purloined, you know, $28,000, $28,800 worth of product that they gave me for free and that, you know, that I had a contract with them to give it in such a way. So, I think that's, you know, that That's That's the law side of it. "The ethical side of it wasn't that hard for me. I'm doing what my patients wanted me to do. After a full discussion of what it is. I, have no ingredient list. I don't know what this product is. There are no toxicity studies. There are no carcinogenic, you know, carcinogenic studies. There are no mutagenic studies. There's nothing out there. This is something that was studied for a total of two months. "And the control group was. Was terminated, because they found that it had 95% effectiveness. Once the numbers came out and it showed that that actual effectiveness was less than 1%, by an absolute risk reduction, then that in and of itself should prove, you know, should show that, hey, this is just ridiculous. There was no benefit. There's nothing out there. "You know, you look at Brook Jackson's study and what it was that she was, you know, that she's tried to present in Texas. That's been thrown out, at least twice now. And you just look at all of the. Everything that's behind it. You know, you mentioned, you know, the ethical side of it. You know, the AMA code of ethics says that a physician is supposed to take care of the patient that's in front of them. Okay? That's your oath. My oath is if you were my patient, I would take care of you. You tell me what your concerns are, you tell me, you know, what your symptoms are, and we come up with a plan. I explain to you what the pros and cons of that are, and then you and I come up with a plan on how to treat you. "And I'm not treating you for your husband or your kids or your neighbors or anybody else. I'm treating you that's in front of you. Okay, that's in front of me. And we come up with a plan. So that's the code of ethics. "There's also a known issue with medicine and the legal system. And the, again, the AMA code of ethics says two things. We know that there is going to be a conflict between ethical and moral medical treatment of people and the law at times. And so as a physician, your duty is to try to do what you can, to do both to take care of your patient and to kind of reconcile the law. "So I did. I went to the state of Utah, I went to the House, I went to some of the Senate subcommittees, I, I was, I testified in some of these committee hearings, to try to get laws changed, mandate laws, mask mandates, Covid mandates, shot mandates. And we were successful. In the state of Utah, we were able to pass laws, that reversed the mask mandates. That made it actually, to some degree, a fineable offense for businesses to require Covid vaccines in order to go to work and to go to school. "And so that was my first step. The second step out of this is that if you cannot change that during the time that you're doing, you are, by ethics and moral values, you are required to take care of your patient in front of you, not to abide by, like you said, to abide by the law. So where is the AMA and all this? That's their code of ethics. I don't see them standing behind me and, you know, and trying to support the medical values and ethics that they, that, you know, that they claim on their website is one of, you know, one of their, you know, bastions of health and what physicians need to do."

Sense Receptor

75,616 次观看 • 1 年前

Zack Snyder expected fans to edit 300 and 300: Rise of an Empire into a single chronological edit. "Well, this film takes place on the same three days as the Battle of Thermopylae. We just get to see a different perspective. We're not from the Spartan perspective. We're from the Free Greek perspective. And we're following this leader, Thermistocles, who is a naval commander." "Yeah, and the other thing we get to see, I think, that's different in this film is it sort of, it also, it jumps forward and backward a little bit because it also goes and sort of paints the origins of Xerxes. So you get to see Xerxes' birth, what caused him to sort of become the character that you saw in the original film. "And you get to see him, you know, transform before your eyes. So it's a, and that's a mystery too. And it's kind of fun to watch that. And I think it, and then you also get to see sort of some elements of the original film kind of woven through to sort of let you see where you are in context of the timeline of the original film. "So you kind of, every now and then you're just checking in with that sort of, the, you know, the Spartans and their, what they're up to. So it's kind of fun that way too." "I love that there's moments where you go, 'Oh, that's the messenger.' And it's not just the characters you expect to see coming back." "Or like when Daxos rides up and tells Thermistocles, like, 'The hot gates have fallen.' You're like, 'Oh, that's awesome.'" "'That's where he went. I remember him leaving.'" "'That's where he went off on the horse. Remember, he rides in the, it's cool.'" "It's a fun way to see the characters that, you know, that connect us to the original film." "I thought it'd be cool, like, if some fan, you know, once this movie comes out on DVD, they can, some fans could cut the two movies together into a single, like, you could cut them into a single film."
1:49

Zack Snyder expected fans to edit 300 and 300: Rise of an Empire into a single chronological edit. "Well, this film takes place on the same three days as the Battle of Thermopylae. We just get to see a different perspective. We're not from the Spartan perspective. We're from the Free Greek perspective. And we're following this leader, Thermistocles, who is a naval commander." "Yeah, and the other thing we get to see, I think, that's different in this film is it sort of, it also, it jumps forward and backward a little bit because it also goes and sort of paints the origins of Xerxes. So you get to see Xerxes' birth, what caused him to sort of become the character that you saw in the original film. "And you get to see him, you know, transform before your eyes. So it's a, and that's a mystery too. And it's kind of fun to watch that. And I think it, and then you also get to see sort of some elements of the original film kind of woven through to sort of let you see where you are in context of the timeline of the original film. "So you kind of, every now and then you're just checking in with that sort of, the, you know, the Spartans and their, what they're up to. So it's kind of fun that way too." "I love that there's moments where you go, 'Oh, that's the messenger.' And it's not just the characters you expect to see coming back." "Or like when Daxos rides up and tells Thermistocles, like, 'The hot gates have fallen.' You're like, 'Oh, that's awesome.'" "'That's where he went. I remember him leaving.'" "'That's where he went off on the horse. Remember, he rides in the, it's cool.'" "It's a fun way to see the characters that, you know, that connect us to the original film." "I thought it'd be cool, like, if some fan, you know, once this movie comes out on DVD, they can, some fans could cut the two movies together into a single, like, you could cut them into a single film."

Zack Snyder Film

20,182 次观看 • 8 个月前

This is NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman take on the recent UAP disclosures. "My position on this is that, look I don't want to comment as to the the credibility of individuals. Some of it I look at and say this is really insightful and some of it I say is that that falls outside the bounds of what I think is perhaps credible on that. Just because somebody worked for the government or had a clearance does not necessarily mean that their interpretation of what they saw is accurate. I think some of it is certainly unexplained based on what we know. And I think some of it if you probably put enough people behind it, you'd say that was a weather balloon, that was a an Iranian one-way attack drone or something. I will tell you I have immense access and have been at a seat at the table since the get-go on this. I have no information, no knowledge, I can take a lie detector test, on any crashed spaceships or bodies or biological organisms on this, but for sure we're gathering a lot of data and there is some unexplained anomalous phenomenon and we are putting it out there as part of these disclosure efforts."
1:20

This is NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman take on the recent UAP disclosures. "My position on this is that, look I don't want to comment as to the the credibility of individuals. Some of it I look at and say this is really insightful and some of it I say is that that falls outside the bounds of what I think is perhaps credible on that. Just because somebody worked for the government or had a clearance does not necessarily mean that their interpretation of what they saw is accurate. I think some of it is certainly unexplained based on what we know. And I think some of it if you probably put enough people behind it, you'd say that was a weather balloon, that was a an Iranian one-way attack drone or something. I will tell you I have immense access and have been at a seat at the table since the get-go on this. I have no information, no knowledge, I can take a lie detector test, on any crashed spaceships or bodies or biological organisms on this, but for sure we're gathering a lot of data and there is some unexplained anomalous phenomenon and we are putting it out there as part of these disclosure efforts."

Peter H. Diamandis, MD

17,079 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨 Alien pilots have been taken alive and communicated with per David Grusch “Have any of these pilots or occupants of these craft to your knowledge been taken alive?” “Yes. And I know people who have had direct interactions in a detainment situation, which sounds very Star Trek and sounds very crazy, but it is true. And I talked to a cabinet member, a former cabinet member about that, who directly worked the issue for a particular former vice president. You can guess which one, Darth Vader.” “And were they able to communicate?” “Yes. And it is true that some sort of um uh consciousness communication, you know, of course people call it telepathy. I cannot begin to tell you how it works. There is some sort of communication like that. And even friends of mine that were on retrievals some felt that kind of communication as they approached the vehicle when they were doing a you know cordoning it off waiting for transport.”
1:28

🚨 Alien pilots have been taken alive and communicated with per David Grusch “Have any of these pilots or occupants of these craft to your knowledge been taken alive?” “Yes. And I know people who have had direct interactions in a detainment situation, which sounds very Star Trek and sounds very crazy, but it is true. And I talked to a cabinet member, a former cabinet member about that, who directly worked the issue for a particular former vice president. You can guess which one, Darth Vader.” “And were they able to communicate?” “Yes. And it is true that some sort of um uh consciousness communication, you know, of course people call it telepathy. I cannot begin to tell you how it works. There is some sort of communication like that. And even friends of mine that were on retrievals some felt that kind of communication as they approached the vehicle when they were doing a you know cordoning it off waiting for transport.”

Red Panda Koala

129,460 次观看 • 1 个月前

Steve Jobs on how he learned to run a company: Question: "You're 21. You're a big success. You know, you've just sort of done it by the seat of your pants. You don't have any particular training in this. How do you learn to run a company?" Steve Jobs: "You know, throughout the years in business, I found something, which was that I always ask why you do things. And the answers you invariably get are, oh, that's just the way it's done. Nobody knows why they do what they do. Nobody thinks about things very deeply in business. That's what I found. I'll give you an example. When we were building our Apple I's in the garage, we knew exactly what they cost. When we got into a factory in the Apple II days, the accounting had this notion of a standard cost, where you'd kind of set a standard cost and at the end of a quarter you'd adjust it with a variance. And I kept asking, well, why do we do this? And the answer was, well, that's just the way it's done. And after about six months of digging into this, what I realized was the reason you do it is because you don't really have good enough controls to know how much it costs. So you guess, and then you fix your guess at the end of the quarter. And the reason you don't know how much it costs is because your information systems aren't good enough. But nobody said it that way. And so later on, when we designed this automated factory for Macintosh, we were able to get rid of a lot of these antiquated concepts and know exactly what something cost to the second. So in business, a lot of things are, I call it folklore. They're done because they were done yesterday and the day before. And so what that means is if you're willing to sort of ask a lot of questions and think about things and work really hard, you can learn business pretty fast. It's not the hardest thing in the world. It's not rocket science. It's not rocket science."
2:06

Steve Jobs on how he learned to run a company: Question: "You're 21. You're a big success. You know, you've just sort of done it by the seat of your pants. You don't have any particular training in this. How do you learn to run a company?" Steve Jobs: "You know, throughout the years in business, I found something, which was that I always ask why you do things. And the answers you invariably get are, oh, that's just the way it's done. Nobody knows why they do what they do. Nobody thinks about things very deeply in business. That's what I found. I'll give you an example. When we were building our Apple I's in the garage, we knew exactly what they cost. When we got into a factory in the Apple II days, the accounting had this notion of a standard cost, where you'd kind of set a standard cost and at the end of a quarter you'd adjust it with a variance. And I kept asking, well, why do we do this? And the answer was, well, that's just the way it's done. And after about six months of digging into this, what I realized was the reason you do it is because you don't really have good enough controls to know how much it costs. So you guess, and then you fix your guess at the end of the quarter. And the reason you don't know how much it costs is because your information systems aren't good enough. But nobody said it that way. And so later on, when we designed this automated factory for Macintosh, we were able to get rid of a lot of these antiquated concepts and know exactly what something cost to the second. So in business, a lot of things are, I call it folklore. They're done because they were done yesterday and the day before. And so what that means is if you're willing to sort of ask a lot of questions and think about things and work really hard, you can learn business pretty fast. It's not the hardest thing in the world. It's not rocket science. It's not rocket science."

Founder Mode

32,290 次观看 • 7 个月前

Zack Snyder on his dyslexia: "It was a challenge for me when I was, you know, young in school, and all I wanted to do was make movies because that was the thing that I got great pleasure from and reward from. I love books, and I'm an avid reader, but I just have a hard time because of the way that I perceive. "I've had a great sort of - one side of me anyways - was really satisfied by art and drawing and sculpture and sort of visual expression. And I think that that started to, you know, was the thing that kind of made me feel un-frustrated. And also the way the system was designed, sort of not to support me when I was in high school at that time. "It was very difficult, you know, there was a lot of, you know, just, difficulty. My English teacher in high school was worried about what my career would be, and I'm like. He would be happy to know that I'm in the Writers Guild of America now. "But, I think that that all those things are, they're all... you can transcend all those things with perseverance and with interest and with with help. And I think that that's an important part of it. "And I just think I've had to adapt, and sort of... I have my own style of the way I write, I write all, you know, but I'm pretty prolific. And I love- I listen to tons of audio books on tape, unabridged hours and hours and hours. That's all I do when I'm driving in the car or wherever I'm doing. And it's helped me a lot. "And yeah, I mean, I just hope that anyone who is- feels trapped or frustrated by the world in general. You know, they need to just, I think that we all have like a magic spark, and you need to just find the thing that makes you, you know, inspires you and, and gets you excited and pursue it as hard as you can find your passion in the world. That's a, that's a great motivator."
2:59

Zack Snyder on his dyslexia: "It was a challenge for me when I was, you know, young in school, and all I wanted to do was make movies because that was the thing that I got great pleasure from and reward from. I love books, and I'm an avid reader, but I just have a hard time because of the way that I perceive. "I've had a great sort of - one side of me anyways - was really satisfied by art and drawing and sculpture and sort of visual expression. And I think that that started to, you know, was the thing that kind of made me feel un-frustrated. And also the way the system was designed, sort of not to support me when I was in high school at that time. "It was very difficult, you know, there was a lot of, you know, just, difficulty. My English teacher in high school was worried about what my career would be, and I'm like. He would be happy to know that I'm in the Writers Guild of America now. "But, I think that that all those things are, they're all... you can transcend all those things with perseverance and with interest and with with help. And I think that that's an important part of it. "And I just think I've had to adapt, and sort of... I have my own style of the way I write, I write all, you know, but I'm pretty prolific. And I love- I listen to tons of audio books on tape, unabridged hours and hours and hours. That's all I do when I'm driving in the car or wherever I'm doing. And it's helped me a lot. "And yeah, I mean, I just hope that anyone who is- feels trapped or frustrated by the world in general. You know, they need to just, I think that we all have like a magic spark, and you need to just find the thing that makes you, you know, inspires you and, and gets you excited and pursue it as hard as you can find your passion in the world. That's a, that's a great motivator."

Zack Snyder Film

11,128 次观看 • 8 个月前

"Those are the easy things that could be done, but I just don't see anybody doing it. It really is so blatantly obvious." ~Nolan on The Mummies Why Hasn't This Been Done with The Mummies? Vinnie - 𝐕𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐬 𝕏 : "These big ones with the tridactyl (having three fingers or toes) appendages. Could they be simply some kind of already-known mutation? Because, you know, in Jesse's (Jesse Michels) video, they're saying, you know, look, there's no evidence that these have been, you know, four, five-fingered, and these have been cut off and tampered with. They are, naturally, three-toed and three-fingered. But, you know, isn't there a known mutation, GLI13, or something like that, that's known that this could be?" Garry P. Nolan: "That might be the gene for polydactyly, (born with extra fingers or toes. ~Joe) or, I don't know, there's probably multiple. But, you know, evolution doesn't work quite like that. In other words, yeah, you can have a mutation that might cause something like that, you know, three fingers, but there are other elements of those fingers that would have to be explained by one mutation. (That bodes well for the mummies...) Nolan: "You know, evolution is, I'll try this, and then I'll add this, and then I'll do this, and then I'll do this. And the mutations will be spread all the way across the genome, each of them compensating for the error that one other mutation might cause. And so, I just don't...I mean, yes, there's a mutation, and that is in support of that they're different, but you need a full genome to look at all at once." (So it's, potentially, something anomalous. But, in order to test that idea...) Nolan: "I mean, the obvious thing to do that I'm surprised nobody's done... I mean, it really is so blatantly obvious. I don't know how many times I've said it: Go, PCR out a whole bunch - Polymerase Chain Reaction - amplify out a whole bunch of metabolic genes. Things that we know should be there if it's, you know, somewhere in the vertebrate family of genes. And do it from several sites over the body, and then see if the sequences line up with, let's say, alcohol dehydrogenase. Maybe they weren't drinkers. You know, you name the gene. "And so, trying to do the whole genome at once, it's a huge, huge issue. It can be done, but there are enough easy first steps that would be preliminary that would allow ME to go to friends of mine in the business of genomics and say, 'Hey, look at this. This is really cool.' Because there will be mutations that will be different, and not in the, let's say, the primate line, and not in the reptilian line. And would give confidence that there's next steps worth doing. "You know, one of the things I felt very uncomfortable about, even at the beginning... They asked, 'How much would it cost?' I said, '$5 million, to do it, right.' I said, 'But, for half a million, I could do the experiment that I just told you.' And then that would be a milestone. That would maybe trigger more money, you know? Whenever I write grants or whenever I start a company, there's always milestone-based outcomes you would expect. And especially in company formats, milestones come with additional tranches of funds. And so, those are the easy things that could be done, but I just don't see anybody doing it." (Really makes you wonder why it hasn't been done. Are they afraid that what it might show is something prosaic?)
3:52

"Those are the easy things that could be done, but I just don't see anybody doing it. It really is so blatantly obvious." ~Nolan on The Mummies Why Hasn't This Been Done with The Mummies? Vinnie - 𝐕𝐢𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐞 𝐀𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐬 𝕏 : "These big ones with the tridactyl (having three fingers or toes) appendages. Could they be simply some kind of already-known mutation? Because, you know, in Jesse's (Jesse Michels) video, they're saying, you know, look, there's no evidence that these have been, you know, four, five-fingered, and these have been cut off and tampered with. They are, naturally, three-toed and three-fingered. But, you know, isn't there a known mutation, GLI13, or something like that, that's known that this could be?" Garry P. Nolan: "That might be the gene for polydactyly, (born with extra fingers or toes. ~Joe) or, I don't know, there's probably multiple. But, you know, evolution doesn't work quite like that. In other words, yeah, you can have a mutation that might cause something like that, you know, three fingers, but there are other elements of those fingers that would have to be explained by one mutation. (That bodes well for the mummies...) Nolan: "You know, evolution is, I'll try this, and then I'll add this, and then I'll do this, and then I'll do this. And the mutations will be spread all the way across the genome, each of them compensating for the error that one other mutation might cause. And so, I just don't...I mean, yes, there's a mutation, and that is in support of that they're different, but you need a full genome to look at all at once." (So it's, potentially, something anomalous. But, in order to test that idea...) Nolan: "I mean, the obvious thing to do that I'm surprised nobody's done... I mean, it really is so blatantly obvious. I don't know how many times I've said it: Go, PCR out a whole bunch - Polymerase Chain Reaction - amplify out a whole bunch of metabolic genes. Things that we know should be there if it's, you know, somewhere in the vertebrate family of genes. And do it from several sites over the body, and then see if the sequences line up with, let's say, alcohol dehydrogenase. Maybe they weren't drinkers. You know, you name the gene. "And so, trying to do the whole genome at once, it's a huge, huge issue. It can be done, but there are enough easy first steps that would be preliminary that would allow ME to go to friends of mine in the business of genomics and say, 'Hey, look at this. This is really cool.' Because there will be mutations that will be different, and not in the, let's say, the primate line, and not in the reptilian line. And would give confidence that there's next steps worth doing. "You know, one of the things I felt very uncomfortable about, even at the beginning... They asked, 'How much would it cost?' I said, '$5 million, to do it, right.' I said, 'But, for half a million, I could do the experiment that I just told you.' And then that would be a milestone. That would maybe trigger more money, you know? Whenever I write grants or whenever I start a company, there's always milestone-based outcomes you would expect. And especially in company formats, milestones come with additional tranches of funds. And so, those are the easy things that could be done, but I just don't see anybody doing it." (Really makes you wonder why it hasn't been done. Are they afraid that what it might show is something prosaic?)

Joe Murgia

111,347 次观看 • 1 年前

"I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Matthew Brown "I think there is a very small group (of humans) that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention (of the non-humans)." ~Brown "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" ~Brown (Brown said this to George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell in May on "Weaponized." ⬇️) "I think I have a good degree of confidence that the reason they're here is us. I think life, especially sentient life, it's a precious thing. And I think, to some, it might be a resource. I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Brown ~From Today's Event ⬇️⬇️⬇️~ Matthew Brown - Matthew: "In the short term, and in my immediate environment, I'm more concerned about humans. But yeah, to get to that next part, I think longer term, you know, I definitely am more concerned about the NHI intentions. You know that's a really broad bucket so, you know, more...you narrow it down to specific groups of them. "It seems at least some of them have been present on Earth for a very long time, but they do not maintain an open relationship with humanity, except for very-discreet encounters with leadership and humans through the sort of abduction or experiencer modalities." (I'm gonna assume that "encounters with leadership" is referring to the alleged Holloman landing.) Brown: "And those certainly, you know, while some people claim to have very positive interactions, there's a very large amount that that have the opposite, especially women, who seem to, unfortunately, you know, get the worst of it, and over a very long period of time. So, I'm very concerned about that. "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" (That's important: Added, removed, suppressed or enhanced. If any of that is true, this goes way beyond, "Well, they haven't blown us up so they must not have bad intentions.") Brown: "You know, I don't have answers, but that's where, you know, you know, this is a journey of discovery, right? And that's kind of where I am at, is again, what are the long term intentions of the NHI present on Earth toward towards humanity?" Leslie Kean: "Do you think there are government officials that know a lot on the classified level and beyond, that have an idea about the intention that they're just not sharing with with anyone? Or, do you think everyone is baffled by that?" Brown: "I think there is a very small group that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention, both in the U.S. government and in, you know, probably the major governments around the world. You know, I have some reason to believe that's true, as well as analysis, so it's a mix of, you know, what we would call evidence and thought. That's where I'm at." Kean: "And just to reiterate, you don't have any idea of what they may have discovered about the intention or any thoughts about what that might be? Is that correct?" Brown: "None that I would say publicly yet. You know, I want to have some degree of certainty before I share something you know serious as that." Kean: "Can you say if you think it might be sort of something that might be quote 'negative' for humanity as we go forward, or something that might be evolutionarily positive for us as a species? You have any sense of that? Of, you know, whether it's a positive or negative kind of intention? Or maybe a mixed one, depending on who we're dealing with. I don't know if you can just can say any more about that." Brown: "it's probably mixed because there seems to be at least more groups involved than just one. So, you know, it's like saying all of humanity's bad news just because you only encountered the worst aspects of humanity. You can't fall into that trap. Yeah, I'd need more data before I would feel comfortable, you know, saying it's definitely this or that." Kean: "Thank you. Yeah, I think that's the big question in everyone's mind, so many people's minds, is the intention. And so far, Jeff (Jeff Nuccetelli) says we're all here. We're still here, except for there are the individuals that have had the frightening encounters. But, you know, nothing on a mass scale has happened to harm us. So, here we are." (Harm can come in many forms. They may not have attacked us with bombs or missiles but, as Brown asked: Have they added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced anything, genetically, or otherwise, from humans? Peter Levenda has written and spoken about this on numerous occasions. Have they done anything to us that's related to consciousness? As far as if there's anybody who knows a lot more about the phenomenon (could be more than one intelligence) and its intentions than we do? I have shared my opinion on that question a few times. IMO, yes. But that's not based on any hard evidence. Does Brown have evidence on that front? Here's something that suggests someone, somewhere, knows more...) Hvbears88: "Interestingly, [Grusch] also mentioned how many people know the full scope of the phenomenon to be no more than 50 people. But it wasn't clear whether this meant 50 people currently alive or 50 people ever in history." (Have these folks read "The Document?") Retired Naval Commander Will Miller: "Through a former NSA contact of mine, I had the chance to meet with a high-level, retired, National Security Agency, senior civilian. And this gentleman, we talked about the subject of UFOs and, again, whether any government agency either had information on the subject or had interest in. And he revealed one tidbit of information I found very interesting. "He said within NSA, there was a document known only as “the document” and it was on the subject of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence. And it was so highly classified that only the Director himself and perhaps one or two other people were actually able to view it. Its existence was widely known, but again, very, very close hold information." Source:
3:50

"I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Matthew Brown "I think there is a very small group (of humans) that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention (of the non-humans)." ~Brown "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" ~Brown (Brown said this to George Knapp and Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell in May on "Weaponized." ⬇️) "I think I have a good degree of confidence that the reason they're here is us. I think life, especially sentient life, it's a precious thing. And I think, to some, it might be a resource. I think humanity, to some level, is a resource for them." ~Brown ~From Today's Event ⬇️⬇️⬇️~ Matthew Brown - Matthew: "In the short term, and in my immediate environment, I'm more concerned about humans. But yeah, to get to that next part, I think longer term, you know, I definitely am more concerned about the NHI intentions. You know that's a really broad bucket so, you know, more...you narrow it down to specific groups of them. "It seems at least some of them have been present on Earth for a very long time, but they do not maintain an open relationship with humanity, except for very-discreet encounters with leadership and humans through the sort of abduction or experiencer modalities." (I'm gonna assume that "encounters with leadership" is referring to the alleged Holloman landing.) Brown: "And those certainly, you know, while some people claim to have very positive interactions, there's a very large amount that that have the opposite, especially women, who seem to, unfortunately, you know, get the worst of it, and over a very long period of time. So, I'm very concerned about that. "If it's true that there has been genetic interventions on humanity at certain points in our evolution, well, I very much wanna know what is the intent behind those interventions. What is being, you know, added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced in humanity, and for what reasons?" (That's important: Added, removed, suppressed or enhanced. If any of that is true, this goes way beyond, "Well, they haven't blown us up so they must not have bad intentions.") Brown: "You know, I don't have answers, but that's where, you know, you know, this is a journey of discovery, right? And that's kind of where I am at, is again, what are the long term intentions of the NHI present on Earth toward towards humanity?" Leslie Kean: "Do you think there are government officials that know a lot on the classified level and beyond, that have an idea about the intention that they're just not sharing with with anyone? Or, do you think everyone is baffled by that?" Brown: "I think there is a very small group that does have a good degree of fidelity on intention, both in the U.S. government and in, you know, probably the major governments around the world. You know, I have some reason to believe that's true, as well as analysis, so it's a mix of, you know, what we would call evidence and thought. That's where I'm at." Kean: "And just to reiterate, you don't have any idea of what they may have discovered about the intention or any thoughts about what that might be? Is that correct?" Brown: "None that I would say publicly yet. You know, I want to have some degree of certainty before I share something you know serious as that." Kean: "Can you say if you think it might be sort of something that might be quote 'negative' for humanity as we go forward, or something that might be evolutionarily positive for us as a species? You have any sense of that? Of, you know, whether it's a positive or negative kind of intention? Or maybe a mixed one, depending on who we're dealing with. I don't know if you can just can say any more about that." Brown: "it's probably mixed because there seems to be at least more groups involved than just one. So, you know, it's like saying all of humanity's bad news just because you only encountered the worst aspects of humanity. You can't fall into that trap. Yeah, I'd need more data before I would feel comfortable, you know, saying it's definitely this or that." Kean: "Thank you. Yeah, I think that's the big question in everyone's mind, so many people's minds, is the intention. And so far, Jeff (Jeff Nuccetelli) says we're all here. We're still here, except for there are the individuals that have had the frightening encounters. But, you know, nothing on a mass scale has happened to harm us. So, here we are." (Harm can come in many forms. They may not have attacked us with bombs or missiles but, as Brown asked: Have they added, removed, suppressed, or enhanced anything, genetically, or otherwise, from humans? Peter Levenda has written and spoken about this on numerous occasions. Have they done anything to us that's related to consciousness? As far as if there's anybody who knows a lot more about the phenomenon (could be more than one intelligence) and its intentions than we do? I have shared my opinion on that question a few times. IMO, yes. But that's not based on any hard evidence. Does Brown have evidence on that front? Here's something that suggests someone, somewhere, knows more...) Hvbears88: "Interestingly, [Grusch] also mentioned how many people know the full scope of the phenomenon to be no more than 50 people. But it wasn't clear whether this meant 50 people currently alive or 50 people ever in history." (Have these folks read "The Document?") Retired Naval Commander Will Miller: "Through a former NSA contact of mine, I had the chance to meet with a high-level, retired, National Security Agency, senior civilian. And this gentleman, we talked about the subject of UFOs and, again, whether any government agency either had information on the subject or had interest in. And he revealed one tidbit of information I found very interesting. "He said within NSA, there was a document known only as “the document” and it was on the subject of UFOs and extraterrestrial intelligence. And it was so highly classified that only the Director himself and perhaps one or two other people were actually able to view it. Its existence was widely known, but again, very, very close hold information." Source:

Joe Murgia

53,699 次观看 • 1 个月前

Jensen Huang on how to convey your vision to employees: Question: "How you convey your vision to your employees and how you keep that sense of urgency in them so that they continue improving themselves?" Jensen: "So the question is how do I convey my vision to the employees and how do we convey a sense of urgency? First of all, you convey your vision the good old-fashioned way. And it's about telling a story. I'm not the best storyteller in the world, and I'm not the best, I don't enjoy public speaking, actually. And if you were to give me a choice right now between doing this versus just answering one of your emails, and I'll give you all my email address, you could all send me an email, and I'd be glad to respond to it. I'd rather do that. You know, I'm still an engineer, and I'm introverted by design, I guess. And I don't find myself particularly articulate. And so I don't enjoy the process of public speaking. But you have to force yourself to do it. It's for a good reason. It's for a good cause. I have to admit that speaking to my employees or speaking to NVIDIA's employees is the single most intimidating thing that I do. It freaks me out. And the reason for that is because I respect their time so much, and I know how important the meeting is, that in your own mind, the bar and the responsibility is extraordinary. But you have to put yourself, and I'm speaking to engineers here, you have to force yourself to communicate at a bigger picture level. You have to force yourself to practice. And it's something that over time you get better at. In terms of how do we communicate a sense of urgency? Just through action. They have to see that when I make decisions or when I do something or when something is near my field of influence, my scope of influence, that I do it with a sense of urgency. And it's amazing what that does. People simply pick up those habits from you. If your CEO works hard, you'll work hard. If your CEO cares, you'll care. If your CEO loves this company, you'll love this company. If your CEO is passionate about the work that we do, you'll be passionate about the work that we do. If your CEO does everything with an extraordinary sense of purpose and intensity and sense of urgency, you will too. It's amazing what happens when you're a leader of anything, whether you're a leader of a project team or, right? As I say that, you could almost everybody just, yeah, I get it. Leader of a project team or a leader of a lab team. The behavior and the values and the habits of that leader has an amazing way of rubbing off on everybody else."
2:52

Jensen Huang on how to convey your vision to employees: Question: "How you convey your vision to your employees and how you keep that sense of urgency in them so that they continue improving themselves?" Jensen: "So the question is how do I convey my vision to the employees and how do we convey a sense of urgency? First of all, you convey your vision the good old-fashioned way. And it's about telling a story. I'm not the best storyteller in the world, and I'm not the best, I don't enjoy public speaking, actually. And if you were to give me a choice right now between doing this versus just answering one of your emails, and I'll give you all my email address, you could all send me an email, and I'd be glad to respond to it. I'd rather do that. You know, I'm still an engineer, and I'm introverted by design, I guess. And I don't find myself particularly articulate. And so I don't enjoy the process of public speaking. But you have to force yourself to do it. It's for a good reason. It's for a good cause. I have to admit that speaking to my employees or speaking to NVIDIA's employees is the single most intimidating thing that I do. It freaks me out. And the reason for that is because I respect their time so much, and I know how important the meeting is, that in your own mind, the bar and the responsibility is extraordinary. But you have to put yourself, and I'm speaking to engineers here, you have to force yourself to communicate at a bigger picture level. You have to force yourself to practice. And it's something that over time you get better at. In terms of how do we communicate a sense of urgency? Just through action. They have to see that when I make decisions or when I do something or when something is near my field of influence, my scope of influence, that I do it with a sense of urgency. And it's amazing what that does. People simply pick up those habits from you. If your CEO works hard, you'll work hard. If your CEO cares, you'll care. If your CEO loves this company, you'll love this company. If your CEO is passionate about the work that we do, you'll be passionate about the work that we do. If your CEO does everything with an extraordinary sense of purpose and intensity and sense of urgency, you will too. It's amazing what happens when you're a leader of anything, whether you're a leader of a project team or, right? As I say that, you could almost everybody just, yeah, I get it. Leader of a project team or a leader of a lab team. The behavior and the values and the habits of that leader has an amazing way of rubbing off on everybody else."

Founder Mode

16,574 次观看 • 7 个月前

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."
2:28

"Courage is far shorter in supply than genius." - Peter Thiel "One of the challenges in writing a book about entrepreneurship or teaching a class on this is that there is sort of no formula. And I think science always starts with a number two. It starts with experiments you can repeat, things you can do over and over again. But there's sort of a sense in which every moment in the history of business, every moment in the history of technology happens only once. The next Mark Zuckerberg will not be starting a social networking company. The next Larry Page will not start a search engine. The next Bill Gates will not be starting an operating system. And so if you are trying to copy these people, you're in some sense not learning from them. And so I think one of the really big challenges in teaching or writing about entrepreneurship is what can you say about being an entrepreneur at all when the key thing is always to do something new, different, that's not precisely been done before. And so the point of departure I start with in Zero to One is a somewhat indirect approach by asking a series of contrarian questions. The business question is, what great company is nobody starting? The more intellectual version of this question is, tell me something true that very few people agree with you on. And this is a fantastic interview question. It turns out to be quite a hard question, even when people can read on the internet that you ask of everybody who comes in the door, it still is a hard question. It's one of those unusual questions where if you know it's on the test, it's still hard. And it's hard not just because we sort of think that new things require brilliance or something like that, but because it's socially difficult. If I ask you that question, if you tell me something like the education system is screwed up or our political system doesn't work very well, those are true answers, but they're not actually good answers because all of us already know them to be true. The good answers are ones that are somehow uncomfortable that the person interviewing you does not actually want to hear. And I think we live in this world where courage is in far shorter supply than genius. And so it is sort of this, it is in a sense this problem of political correctness properly understood, is this very deep, very, very broad sort of a problem."

Founder Mode

12,339 次观看 • 7 个月前

Following my UFO research shared yesterday there has been a huge reaction, much of it very supportive but the best feedback I've been given is stuff like this! Where another pair of keen eyes and lateral thinking turns up interesting new information Polarity here demonstrates how the traditional Google map search for the base shows what looks like wasteland or construction, from 2017 And now I realise why some people were sending me odd questions about the base because unless you update it manually you don't see what is actually there now in 2025 And of course I am in the UK and we see many different versions of not just Google but other US-based information, some of it actually helps my other research as I appear to have access to some things that Americans don't, but it works both ways However I urge you to watch the full critique that Josh does which is very fair and very constructive helping me know what else I have not made clear or not looked at in enough detail Also I realise people are so suspicious of AI that they simply think I am some idiot that just asks it questions and waits for it to answer them; understandably I know because many people do this But if you listen to the Space that I hosted directly after posting yesterday or indeed look at the complete discussion I had with AI, which I have published in its entirety, hopefully you will see that researchers like myself use it only as a tool. For example I looked at architecture, Electro magnetic security, geology/construction and anomalies in building locations, none of which it volunteered. Thank you very much to Josh for this and anybody else who has this sort of insightful constructive feedback please do let me know.
3:05

Following my UFO research shared yesterday there has been a huge reaction, much of it very supportive but the best feedback I've been given is stuff like this! Where another pair of keen eyes and lateral thinking turns up interesting new information Polarity here demonstrates how the traditional Google map search for the base shows what looks like wasteland or construction, from 2017 And now I realise why some people were sending me odd questions about the base because unless you update it manually you don't see what is actually there now in 2025 And of course I am in the UK and we see many different versions of not just Google but other US-based information, some of it actually helps my other research as I appear to have access to some things that Americans don't, but it works both ways However I urge you to watch the full critique that Josh does which is very fair and very constructive helping me know what else I have not made clear or not looked at in enough detail Also I realise people are so suspicious of AI that they simply think I am some idiot that just asks it questions and waits for it to answer them; understandably I know because many people do this But if you listen to the Space that I hosted directly after posting yesterday or indeed look at the complete discussion I had with AI, which I have published in its entirety, hopefully you will see that researchers like myself use it only as a tool. For example I looked at architecture, Electro magnetic security, geology/construction and anomalies in building locations, none of which it volunteered. Thank you very much to Josh for this and anybody else who has this sort of insightful constructive feedback please do let me know.

Moneypenny

19,957 次观看 • 1 年前

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Why is Anthropic structurally a religion of Claude? We asked Duncan, writer and philosopher at PALLADIUM Magazine "When I think of religion, it's not just you believe in something supernatural. You think of worship and ritual and this kind of orientation. And you don't even have to have any kind of woo addition, you can just look at Anthropic as it is and say, 'This is a religion of Claude, just structurally. That's what it is.'" "We're gonna get so much more of that. And at the same time, you're also going to get all of these different religions sweeping in to fill the void as there's this kind of psychological disturbance." "Everyone's gonna be just losing their mind as the world is transformed. They're gonna reach out for Christian eschatology like Thiel." "I did a Jhana retreat a year ago, and it was full of Anthropic employees, because everyone, they sense this crazy spiritual whirlwind that's going on as the world is just snowballing with this technology, and they're reaching out just to try and make sense of it."
2:03

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Why is Anthropic structurally a religion of Claude? We asked Duncan, writer and philosopher at PALLADIUM Magazine "When I think of religion, it's not just you believe in something supernatural. You think of worship and ritual and this kind of orientation. And you don't even have to have any kind of woo addition, you can just look at Anthropic as it is and say, 'This is a religion of Claude, just structurally. That's what it is.'" "We're gonna get so much more of that. And at the same time, you're also going to get all of these different religions sweeping in to fill the void as there's this kind of psychological disturbance." "Everyone's gonna be just losing their mind as the world is transformed. They're gonna reach out for Christian eschatology like Thiel." "I did a Jhana retreat a year ago, and it was full of Anthropic employees, because everyone, they sense this crazy spiritual whirlwind that's going on as the world is just snowballing with this technology, and they're reaching out just to try and make sense of it."

MTS

15,505 次观看 • 2 个月前

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”
1:31

Garry Nolan says there are more groups doing what skywatcher is doing right now “we know how to call them” “Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently.” Source -Sol Foundation 🔗 in comments Garry -“The, the information's out there, we, you know, it's already pretty well understood. I mean, look, there's been enough whistleblower types where the information of how to do this has leaked out. You know, we know how to call them. Whether you believe in psionics or not, it seems to be part of the process. So we know how to call them. The question is not can you video them? Skywatcher has already shown that you can video them and there'll be more of that kind of stuff, I think coming in the future, you know, so Skywatcher is one group of several that I'm aware of that are doing it independently. So that's citizen science. I mean, I think the answer is you don't wait for the government to do it, for you. Don't wait for daddy or mommy to tell you what's going on. You just do it yourself. Because as long as you're not going out there with, with guns or energy, weapons, trying to pull something down and, you know, get yourself in a bad situation, there's no reason people can't do it themselves and organize. So, you know, that's, that I think is the threat in a way that one needs to use against the governmental authorities who think that they hold all the, all the, all the marbles at this point, they don't anymore because the people who've been in the program, like Jake and others who've, you know, made that statement publicly, have basically made their knowledge and ability public. So do it.”

neandrewthal

74,654 次观看 • 1 年前

.Peter Meijer on Trump's #WHCD remarks... "There were jokes that landed very well. There were jokes that did not. There were times when the remarks that were being delivered were funny and were --- were flowing. And then there were times that were veered off script. You know, I thought the I really wish that the, the Bari Weiss/Mojtaba Khamenei joke would have been delivered a little bit better. I thought there was some substance behind that one that -- that the room would have -- took it as tongue in cheek." "But it's also, like, a shift in tone, right? Because this is three months after the first one had to be delayed because of an assassination attempt. You know, we're coming up on the one-year anniversary of Charlie Kirk's assassination. It's been just celebrated -- celebrated? -- marked the two-year anniversary of the Butler assassination. Shinzo Abe's assassination was four years ago this month. So, you know, I think Trump is trying to be -- he's trying to have some levity. You know, he's got some real emotions at play, too, though."
0:57

.Peter Meijer on Trump's #WHCD remarks... "There were jokes that landed very well. There were jokes that did not. There were times when the remarks that were being delivered were funny and were --- were flowing. And then there were times that were veered off script. You know, I thought the I really wish that the, the Bari Weiss/Mojtaba Khamenei joke would have been delivered a little bit better. I thought there was some substance behind that one that -- that the room would have -- took it as tongue in cheek." "But it's also, like, a shift in tone, right? Because this is three months after the first one had to be delayed because of an assassination attempt. You know, we're coming up on the one-year anniversary of Charlie Kirk's assassination. It's been just celebrated -- celebrated? -- marked the two-year anniversary of the Butler assassination. Shinzo Abe's assassination was four years ago this month. So, you know, I think Trump is trying to be -- he's trying to have some levity. You know, he's got some real emotions at play, too, though."

Curtis Houck

59,802 次观看 • 2 个月前

Elon Musk: I'll be long dead before we're really a multiplanet species. But at least I'd like to see us make great progress in this direction. “Why do these things? I think this is important for maximizing the probable lifespan of humanity or consciousness. Human civilization could come to an end for external reasons, like a giant meteor, or supervolcanoes, or extreme climate change. Or World War III, or, you know, any one of a number of reasons. But the probable lifespan of civilization and consciousness, as we know it, which we should really view as this very delicate thing, like a small candle in a vast darkness, that is what appears to be the case. We're in this vast darkness of space, and there's this little candle of consciousness that's only really come about after 4.5 billion years. And it could just go out. I think that's powerful, and I think a lot of people will be inspired by that vision. And so the reason you need the million people is because there has to be enough people there to do everything that you need to survive. The critical threshold is, if the ships from Earth stop coming for any reason, does the Mars city die out or not? We have to pass that. People talk about the great filters, the things that perhaps, you know, we talk about the Fermi paradox and where are the aliens, and, well, maybe there is various great filters that the aliens didn't pass, and so they eventually just cease to exist. And one of the great filters is becoming a multiplanet species. So we want to pass that filter. And I'll be long dead before this is a real thing, before it happens. But I'd like to at least see us make great progress in this direction.” Source: TED, April 6, 2022.
2:05

Elon Musk: I'll be long dead before we're really a multiplanet species. But at least I'd like to see us make great progress in this direction. “Why do these things? I think this is important for maximizing the probable lifespan of humanity or consciousness. Human civilization could come to an end for external reasons, like a giant meteor, or supervolcanoes, or extreme climate change. Or World War III, or, you know, any one of a number of reasons. But the probable lifespan of civilization and consciousness, as we know it, which we should really view as this very delicate thing, like a small candle in a vast darkness, that is what appears to be the case. We're in this vast darkness of space, and there's this little candle of consciousness that's only really come about after 4.5 billion years. And it could just go out. I think that's powerful, and I think a lot of people will be inspired by that vision. And so the reason you need the million people is because there has to be enough people there to do everything that you need to survive. The critical threshold is, if the ships from Earth stop coming for any reason, does the Mars city die out or not? We have to pass that. People talk about the great filters, the things that perhaps, you know, we talk about the Fermi paradox and where are the aliens, and, well, maybe there is various great filters that the aliens didn't pass, and so they eventually just cease to exist. And one of the great filters is becoming a multiplanet species. So we want to pass that filter. And I'll be long dead before this is a real thing, before it happens. But I'd like to at least see us make great progress in this direction.” Source: TED, April 6, 2022.

ELON CLIPS

36,981 次观看 • 2 个月前

Namjoon said that there were another option like choosing “Wonder where the waves are taking you” instead of “I could spend a lifetime watching you” Loved that version too😭 Q: So your song “SWIM,” I'm sure it's open to interpretation from anyone anywhere. The way I look at it, I don't know. I see it as, look, you're swimming in the ocean and you just got to go where the tide takes you. Is that partly what it's about? 🐨: It's just funny that like some people like listen to it like a just like a you know, like a typical love song, like oh, I spend lifetime watching you, like because of the lyrics of that girl, like something like that. But I think you got the point because the last, the actually the most… This is kind of behind the scene. I ever, I never told but uh, the last important like debates was that. 🐨: So there were two lines for the like “swim swim water falling off your skin swim swim, I could spend a lifetime watching you.” So there were a candidate, which is “Wonder where the waves are taking you?” So between “I could spend lifetime watching you” and Wonder where the waves are taking you”… Everybody like have talked a lot, but some people just told me, like I just loved this song because of that single line, like which is saying it's just singing like “I could spend lifetime watching you.” So we decided to got with that. 🐨: But I actually loved the vibe that it has, like “wonder where the waves are taking you?” So the song is just about it, could be also a love song for somebody because it could be quite universal. And I was thinking of the lives at the time that we were not beside the fans because we were in the military. We spent like five hundred and fifty days in the troupe, and we were just like counting day, like okay, five hundred forty nine, four hundred thirty seventy or something like that. So I was like thinking of just like swimming with the time and just one one one step, one step, pedal, pedal, pedal. So yeah, the song is actually about that!
2:08

Namjoon said that there were another option like choosing “Wonder where the waves are taking you” instead of “I could spend a lifetime watching you” Loved that version too😭 Q: So your song “SWIM,” I'm sure it's open to interpretation from anyone anywhere. The way I look at it, I don't know. I see it as, look, you're swimming in the ocean and you just got to go where the tide takes you. Is that partly what it's about? 🐨: It's just funny that like some people like listen to it like a just like a you know, like a typical love song, like oh, I spend lifetime watching you, like because of the lyrics of that girl, like something like that. But I think you got the point because the last, the actually the most… This is kind of behind the scene. I ever, I never told but uh, the last important like debates was that. 🐨: So there were two lines for the like “swim swim water falling off your skin swim swim, I could spend a lifetime watching you.” So there were a candidate, which is “Wonder where the waves are taking you?” So between “I could spend lifetime watching you” and Wonder where the waves are taking you”… Everybody like have talked a lot, but some people just told me, like I just loved this song because of that single line, like which is saying it's just singing like “I could spend lifetime watching you.” So we decided to got with that. 🐨: But I actually loved the vibe that it has, like “wonder where the waves are taking you?” So the song is just about it, could be also a love song for somebody because it could be quite universal. And I was thinking of the lives at the time that we were not beside the fans because we were in the military. We spent like five hundred and fifty days in the troupe, and we were just like counting day, like okay, five hundred forty nine, four hundred thirty seventy or something like that. So I was like thinking of just like swimming with the time and just one one one step, one step, pedal, pedal, pedal. So yeah, the song is actually about that!

bangtan⁷ | ⊙⊝⊜

51,417 次观看 • 6 个月前