Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

EXIT WOUND THEORY Charlie Kirk assassination. If this IS the EXIT WOUND and NOT the ENTRANCE, this theory is very plausible. This entire video brings up every crucial point to take into consideration with analysis if the shooter was behind Charlie. FBI Dir. Kash Patel even brought up the...

TheSCIF's profile picture

The SCIF

336,417 subscribers

506,588 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungComedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The "VAN THEORY" Did the fatal shot/projectile come from inside or around the van behind Charlie Kirk? - The most fascinating part of this video is the alleged projectile that was caught on film directly before Charlie was hit, which would coincide with the front wound being an EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. - The overall angle makes more sense than the alleged rooftop shooter theory, which we now know was NOT a .30-06 round and was 99.9% most likely not taken from on top of the Losee building. - The back hatch of the van does open right before Charlie gets shot and then it closes immediately after. I believe we are getting a lot closer to the truth, while we uncover the massive amount of distractions and actors they had in place to cause misdirection, along with finding motives from potential foreign and or domestic actors. What are your overall theories and comments and is this object caught on camera the projectile that we've been looking for? cc: HustleBitch
1:58

The "VAN THEORY" Did the fatal shot/projectile come from inside or around the van behind Charlie Kirk? - The most fascinating part of this video is the alleged projectile that was caught on film directly before Charlie was hit, which would coincide with the front wound being an EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. - The overall angle makes more sense than the alleged rooftop shooter theory, which we now know was NOT a .30-06 round and was 99.9% most likely not taken from on top of the Losee building. - The back hatch of the van does open right before Charlie gets shot and then it closes immediately after. I believe we are getting a lot closer to the truth, while we uncover the massive amount of distractions and actors they had in place to cause misdirection, along with finding motives from potential foreign and or domestic actors. What are your overall theories and comments and is this object caught on camera the projectile that we've been looking for? cc: HustleBitch

The SCIF

85,858 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

3D reconstruction & analysis of Charlie Kirk assassination that speaks volumes. 4 different shooter location perspectives with line of sight and shot trajectory line with very interesting conclusions. Also includes sound analysis of official narrative which is the most important and telling results, which breaks the official narrative once again. - The sound analysis and the video proved that we heard the shot and saw Charlie getting shot at the same time, when Charlie should of been shot first then we would of heard the sound of the shot if it was at 150 yards with the rifle they claim shot Charlie, considering the speed of the bullet and the speed of sound. - This conclusion means that the shot had to come from a closer proximity, from 50 yards or less, not 150 yards, considering that we do know exactly where the video and audio was taken from, and how far it was away from Charlie. Watch the full video for full context and to understand all 4 shooter locations and sound analysis conclusion. It's starting to narrow down some possibilities, which is great. Little by little we move closer to the truth. Thoughts, comments, and speculation down below, the more eyes and theories the better. cc: Trigger Smart
15:07

3D reconstruction & analysis of Charlie Kirk assassination that speaks volumes. 4 different shooter location perspectives with line of sight and shot trajectory line with very interesting conclusions. Also includes sound analysis of official narrative which is the most important and telling results, which breaks the official narrative once again. - The sound analysis and the video proved that we heard the shot and saw Charlie getting shot at the same time, when Charlie should of been shot first then we would of heard the sound of the shot if it was at 150 yards with the rifle they claim shot Charlie, considering the speed of the bullet and the speed of sound. - This conclusion means that the shot had to come from a closer proximity, from 50 yards or less, not 150 yards, considering that we do know exactly where the video and audio was taken from, and how far it was away from Charlie. Watch the full video for full context and to understand all 4 shooter locations and sound analysis conclusion. It's starting to narrow down some possibilities, which is great. Little by little we move closer to the truth. Thoughts, comments, and speculation down below, the more eyes and theories the better. cc: Trigger Smart

The SCIF

63,486 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

New ASSASSINATION RECREATION video shows that Charlie Kirk's shooter was most likely located to the BACK/SIDE RIGHT of Charlie and NOT in front of him. The results are very compelling and explain why many do not believe the official story. The ballistics gel dummy with a skeletal system mimicking the human body reacts in the same ways that Charlie did when he was shot, from the shirt puffing up, to Charlie's necklace even blowing off. The results from this test speak for themselves and you even get to see them in slow motion and from different angles. The test was not perfect and will be done again for even more accuracy but lines up with the theory that the shooter was located up and to the back right of Charlie's position, located in the picture below. cc: Range Day Bro
8:51

New ASSASSINATION RECREATION video shows that Charlie Kirk's shooter was most likely located to the BACK/SIDE RIGHT of Charlie and NOT in front of him. The results are very compelling and explain why many do not believe the official story. The ballistics gel dummy with a skeletal system mimicking the human body reacts in the same ways that Charlie did when he was shot, from the shirt puffing up, to Charlie's necklace even blowing off. The results from this test speak for themselves and you even get to see them in slow motion and from different angles. The test was not perfect and will be done again for even more accuracy but lines up with the theory that the shooter was located up and to the back right of Charlie's position, located in the picture below. cc: Range Day Bro

The SCIF

159,870 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens
12:27

Candace stands her ground that this was an INTELLIGENCE/MILITARY type operation with multiple ACTORS for distractions. -Was Lance "Twiggs" one of the other people than we seen at UVU on the day of the shooting? - George Zinn had to receive medical attention the day of the shooting and stated to multiple people at the hospital that he said he acted like he k*lled Charlie because he said he was going to be paid for doing it. - We know of 4 potential "ACTORS" George Zinn, Maroon shirt guy, The guy on the stairs, and the guy on the Losee building. These could all and MOST LIKELY all be distractions to take attention away from the real killer. - Candace states that she believes Tyler's role in all of it had something to do with the changing of outfits to confuse investigators because he was seen putting a change of clothes in the graveyard and then is seen at the DQ in the infamous picture. - The reason coming to this conclusion is because we never see the "person" on the Losee building ever take a shot, we just see him running, and the guy in the maroon shirt, looks, and has a different build from the guy on the stairs in the black shirt and hat. - We know now with all the evidence we have gathered and concluded from this point that there is no way Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round or from the roof of the Losee building because of the alleged autopsy report that claims his C2 vertebrae broke first and by the location and angle of the alleged "entrance wound" that looks more like an "exit wound." - The bullet would of had to enter Charlie through his mouth or jaw in order to physically break the C2 bone first, pull a 90 degree angle and continue to break the C7. None of it makes any sense if the alleged autopsy report is 100% official as it claims. Plus they said they found the bullet right beneath the skin. - He had to be shot from a different location with a smaller round or some kind of other projectile weapon/round. This was a highly orchestrated hit and it has intelligence written all over it. I have came to all the same conclusions in my previous posts and stand with Candace. The writing is on the wall. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

146,753 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens
6:43

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

590,339 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

WATCH CHARLIE'S SHIRT. This is a very interesting video to say the least. Look how far it pulls back behind him and is it moving before anything else does in the frame? What does this erratic movement honestly tell you? Does this lean more of a bullet or projectile of some sort pulling the shirt before or after impact or when it is exiting? Or does this tell you that maybe something exploded and pulled his shirt because of the split second movement before anything else seems to move? What is your honest opinion and theory about this video? The shirt movement is very odd. The 2 most important pieces of information we need to narrow down the speculation is a video with Tyler in the prone position with the rifle taking the shot. And we also need to know if the wound on Charlie's neck is an ENTRANCE or an EXIT, and where the 2ND hole is IF THERE EVEN IS A 2ND HOLE. Candace recently disclosed that Charlie was adding a DOGE type team to TPUSA because "money" was missing or being spent too fast. She said he honestly didn't know where it was going and also where all the money was really even COMING FROM... More data points and more evidence to help us find the truth. FBI Dir. Kash Patel said that they have crucial information that they WILL NOT release yet, and DID NOT rule out a 2ND SHOOTER. They are also looking into 20+ more people involved or associated in some way. We will continue to to dig. The truth will eventually reveal itself. NEVER GIVE UP. EVER. cc: MJTruthUltra
1:46

WATCH CHARLIE'S SHIRT. This is a very interesting video to say the least. Look how far it pulls back behind him and is it moving before anything else does in the frame? What does this erratic movement honestly tell you? Does this lean more of a bullet or projectile of some sort pulling the shirt before or after impact or when it is exiting? Or does this tell you that maybe something exploded and pulled his shirt because of the split second movement before anything else seems to move? What is your honest opinion and theory about this video? The shirt movement is very odd. The 2 most important pieces of information we need to narrow down the speculation is a video with Tyler in the prone position with the rifle taking the shot. And we also need to know if the wound on Charlie's neck is an ENTRANCE or an EXIT, and where the 2ND hole is IF THERE EVEN IS A 2ND HOLE. Candace recently disclosed that Charlie was adding a DOGE type team to TPUSA because "money" was missing or being spent too fast. She said he honestly didn't know where it was going and also where all the money was really even COMING FROM... More data points and more evidence to help us find the truth. FBI Dir. Kash Patel said that they have crucial information that they WILL NOT release yet, and DID NOT rule out a 2ND SHOOTER. They are also looking into 20+ more people involved or associated in some way. We will continue to to dig. The truth will eventually reveal itself. NEVER GIVE UP. EVER. cc: MJTruthUltra

The SCIF

299,051 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT
1:29

It seems that everyone has come to the SAME conclusion that Charlie Kirk was NOT shot with a .30-06. Where do we go from here? - 99.9% NOT a front shot from a .30-06. This is why it is hard to progress into what actually happened and where the shooter actually was or with what weapon or projectile. - The biggest tell is NO EXIT WOUND and the minimal damage that was seen. The ballistics also do not make sense at all. - The angle of the shot and location would most likely NOT have had any disruptions or have STRUCK ANYTHING in its path besides soft tissue and muscle, etc. NOT even striking any bones, which would not in general cause it to change its path and angle another staggering 81 degrees to enter down into Charlie's body. The shot would have EASILY went straight through and would have easily shattered any bones along the way, especially in the human neck, if it even hit any. What makes this entire situation difficult to conclude and to progress in the state of affairs is the fact that there is NO EXIT WOUND, and the only hole we see looks LIKE AN EXIT WOUND and NOT an ENTRANCE WOUND. cc: Mario Nawfal, RT

The SCIF

60,377 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The .30-06, NAIL in the COFFIN, Charlie Kirk assassination video that PROVES that the official narrative is false. You can continue to stay naive or stand up for the TRUTH and what is right. All we want is the truth. - Elevated position from 150yds away. - 3 different types of .30-06 rounds. - Pork shoulders to simulate a human neck, with a STEEL PLATE, and two, 2-liter bottles of soda. All 3 different types of .30-06 rounds goes completely through the simulated human neck pork shoulders, the steel plate, and the 2 liter bottle of soda. There is 100% NO WAY, that Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round, from an elevated position, 150 yards away, and the bullet did not go through and cause a TREMENDOUS amount of damage, including a dramatic EXIT WOUND. This is why, ladies and gentleman, people have questions about the validity of the official narrative of what really happened to Charlie Kirk. We are being lied to and we MUST find out why. cc: CR42 Hunting
5:13

The .30-06, NAIL in the COFFIN, Charlie Kirk assassination video that PROVES that the official narrative is false. You can continue to stay naive or stand up for the TRUTH and what is right. All we want is the truth. - Elevated position from 150yds away. - 3 different types of .30-06 rounds. - Pork shoulders to simulate a human neck, with a STEEL PLATE, and two, 2-liter bottles of soda. All 3 different types of .30-06 rounds goes completely through the simulated human neck pork shoulders, the steel plate, and the 2 liter bottle of soda. There is 100% NO WAY, that Charlie was shot with a .30-06 round, from an elevated position, 150 yards away, and the bullet did not go through and cause a TREMENDOUS amount of damage, including a dramatic EXIT WOUND. This is why, ladies and gentleman, people have questions about the validity of the official narrative of what really happened to Charlie Kirk. We are being lied to and we MUST find out why. cc: CR42 Hunting

The SCIF

133,791 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Key details and updated information about the Charlie Kirk assassination. ATF internal memos reportedly reveal the weapon used to assassinate Charlie Kirk yesterday at Utah Valley University held bullets engraved with transgender and anti-fascist slogans. The caliber believed to be used was a .30-06 which is a very large caliber usually used for hunting and some marksmen which is more than capable to do the job. They wanted to make sure they eliminated the target. The biggest questions you should be asking are, all the people who were initially arrested and set up to be decoys to allow the real shooter to get away. Especially when one is yelling "shoot me" as being handcuffed and others allegedly caught with rifles or pellet guns. Another tell is exactly when he was shot, the wording was the cue, the people around him video taping and the odd hand movements, but most importantly the people looking back and up, CHEERING as soon as Charlie was struck. This was highly organized and people were waiting for it to happen. There were also many posting about something happening to Charlie that will happen at the event or "tomorrow" meaning, at the event. It seems like there was word within the left/trans community and others circling around that they were aware of. Really look at all the evidence. All the comments and things Charlie was speaking up about over the past few months and they all point to The left, the trans community and Israel. That was not an easy shot and that rifle had to be zeroed in perfectly. Most likely a trans shooter or a far left activist. Especially after words found inscribed on the gun or ammo. But it could also be a way to take attention away from intelligence and towards a specific group. This was either an intelligence operation by itself made to look like a trans shooter. A combination of both, an infiltrated group by intelligence to complete the overall goal of the assassination of Charlie Kirk or just a group of radical left and trans activists. All the reasons described above should be apart of forming your opinion. There are also many other details as well. These are just the few that stuck out. Really think about this logically. Remove emotions. Charlie knew something was coming. People were also sending him posts over the months basically telling him to shut up about Israel. But the far-left and trans community hated him. We need more information to make a final conclusion. Remove emotions, think logically. "The suspect fired one shot from an elevated position on a rooftop in an adjacent building on the campus and surveillance video shows the suspect, jumping off and fleeing the area on foot. ATF and other law-enforcement located an older model imported Mauser .30-06 caliber bolt action rifle wrapped in a towel in a wooded area near the campus. The location of the firearm appears to match the suspects route of travel. The spent cartridge was still chambered in addition to three unspent rounds at the top fed magazine. All cartridges have engraved wording on them, expressing transgender and anti-fascist ideology." The firearm is being disassembled for more information on where it was obtained. CC: Steven Crowder
1:22

Key details and updated information about the Charlie Kirk assassination. ATF internal memos reportedly reveal the weapon used to assassinate Charlie Kirk yesterday at Utah Valley University held bullets engraved with transgender and anti-fascist slogans. The caliber believed to be used was a .30-06 which is a very large caliber usually used for hunting and some marksmen which is more than capable to do the job. They wanted to make sure they eliminated the target. The biggest questions you should be asking are, all the people who were initially arrested and set up to be decoys to allow the real shooter to get away. Especially when one is yelling "shoot me" as being handcuffed and others allegedly caught with rifles or pellet guns. Another tell is exactly when he was shot, the wording was the cue, the people around him video taping and the odd hand movements, but most importantly the people looking back and up, CHEERING as soon as Charlie was struck. This was highly organized and people were waiting for it to happen. There were also many posting about something happening to Charlie that will happen at the event or "tomorrow" meaning, at the event. It seems like there was word within the left/trans community and others circling around that they were aware of. Really look at all the evidence. All the comments and things Charlie was speaking up about over the past few months and they all point to The left, the trans community and Israel. That was not an easy shot and that rifle had to be zeroed in perfectly. Most likely a trans shooter or a far left activist. Especially after words found inscribed on the gun or ammo. But it could also be a way to take attention away from intelligence and towards a specific group. This was either an intelligence operation by itself made to look like a trans shooter. A combination of both, an infiltrated group by intelligence to complete the overall goal of the assassination of Charlie Kirk or just a group of radical left and trans activists. All the reasons described above should be apart of forming your opinion. There are also many other details as well. These are just the few that stuck out. Really think about this logically. Remove emotions. Charlie knew something was coming. People were also sending him posts over the months basically telling him to shut up about Israel. But the far-left and trans community hated him. We need more information to make a final conclusion. Remove emotions, think logically. "The suspect fired one shot from an elevated position on a rooftop in an adjacent building on the campus and surveillance video shows the suspect, jumping off and fleeing the area on foot. ATF and other law-enforcement located an older model imported Mauser .30-06 caliber bolt action rifle wrapped in a towel in a wooded area near the campus. The location of the firearm appears to match the suspects route of travel. The spent cartridge was still chambered in addition to three unspent rounds at the top fed magazine. All cartridges have engraved wording on them, expressing transgender and anti-fascist ideology." The firearm is being disassembled for more information on where it was obtained. CC: Steven Crowder

The SCIF

67,025 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

🚨THE SHOOTER WAS MUCH CLOSER - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE CROWD 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “It is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day, maybe even deciding in the last hour which one of them would take the shot.” “It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun… which had to come from the front of Charlie.” “We are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie, and likely in the audience.” “That goes a long way in explaining why they’re hiding the footage from behind Charlie’s head.” “Of all the cameras, why grab that one first?” “There’s a lot of hiding and definitively a lot of lying going on.”
2:07

🚨THE SHOOTER WAS MUCH CLOSER - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE CROWD 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “It is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day, maybe even deciding in the last hour which one of them would take the shot.” “It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun… which had to come from the front of Charlie.” “We are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie, and likely in the audience.” “That goes a long way in explaining why they’re hiding the footage from behind Charlie’s head.” “Of all the cameras, why grab that one first?” “There’s a lot of hiding and definitively a lot of lying going on.”

HustleBitch

101,606 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

CRUCIAL ANALYSIS of Charlie Kirk assassination. There is NO WAY a .30-06 round hit Charlie directly in the neck period. The damage would be tremendous, especially out the back. We need to continue to ask questions and work together. Not get mad at one another for bouncing theories and ideas off of one another. The SIDE SHO*TER FLASH does flash before the crack of the rifle sound which is consistent with the speed of sound, seeing the flash of a barrel before hearing it. Take notice to the direction the T-SHIRT pulls, this is interesting if Charlie was wearing a vest and a bullet fragment hit him in the neck, therefor causing no exit wound. Bullet entry wounds are usually small in the front and large out the back, especially with hollow point rounds because they flatten on impact. The neck is very fragile especially considering if a main artery is ruptured or torn from a gun shot. There is no way he was shot with a .30-06 round because there is no extreme damage on the neck and especially behind it with NO BULLET EXIT WOUND. It would of been catastrophic damage. The only thing that makes sense is if it was a fragment of the bullet round itself off the bullet proof vest. But what if he wasn't wearing one? We need to verify if Charlie was wearing a vest and what kind. This question should have been answered immediately, but it was never even asked. No way a .30-06 round hit Charlie's neck straight on PERIOD. Unless it was an exit wound from a completely other gun, sho*ter, or object, angle, etc. There are many more layers and theories but this needs to be said. Keep asking questions and keep digging. Would love to hear your thoughts and feed back. cc: ProjectConstitution
3:05

CRUCIAL ANALYSIS of Charlie Kirk assassination. There is NO WAY a .30-06 round hit Charlie directly in the neck period. The damage would be tremendous, especially out the back. We need to continue to ask questions and work together. Not get mad at one another for bouncing theories and ideas off of one another. The SIDE SHO*TER FLASH does flash before the crack of the rifle sound which is consistent with the speed of sound, seeing the flash of a barrel before hearing it. Take notice to the direction the T-SHIRT pulls, this is interesting if Charlie was wearing a vest and a bullet fragment hit him in the neck, therefor causing no exit wound. Bullet entry wounds are usually small in the front and large out the back, especially with hollow point rounds because they flatten on impact. The neck is very fragile especially considering if a main artery is ruptured or torn from a gun shot. There is no way he was shot with a .30-06 round because there is no extreme damage on the neck and especially behind it with NO BULLET EXIT WOUND. It would of been catastrophic damage. The only thing that makes sense is if it was a fragment of the bullet round itself off the bullet proof vest. But what if he wasn't wearing one? We need to verify if Charlie was wearing a vest and what kind. This question should have been answered immediately, but it was never even asked. No way a .30-06 round hit Charlie's neck straight on PERIOD. Unless it was an exit wound from a completely other gun, sho*ter, or object, angle, etc. There are many more layers and theories but this needs to be said. Keep asking questions and keep digging. Would love to hear your thoughts and feed back. cc: ProjectConstitution

The SCIF

437,653 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.
0:16

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk 🚨 Muzzle Flash: Second Shooter Location, Reflection, or Both? This video captures a flash on a window right as Charlie Kirk was shot. Let’s break this down… follow the numbers on the videos. #1. This video shows what appears to be a muzzle flash, just as Charlie is shot, leading people to believe the shooter was to Charlie’s right.. Notate the people to the left of the flash #2. This photo shows the location of the flash. Notate people to the left, on a middle-landing on a staircase. #3. This photo shows a clearer image showing both the middle-landing and the same location of the flash. It is a window. #4 . This video shows the building behind Charlie, which is a long hallway. This debunks any claims the shot came from here. — I zoom in where Charlie was — I zoom in on staircase — I zoom in on the window/flash — I zoom in on where suspected shooter was #5. I notate the flash reflection angles. — Video angle #1 notated — two reflection paths notated in relation to Video angle #1. 1. Reflection angle shows where we were told the shooter was. 2. Reflection angle shows mirrored angle, obviously where there is no reports of a shooter being in. 🔻 Final conclusion: This to me is very likely a muzzle flash reflection from a far off location. I am unsure of the reflection angle however, but this can be 100% proven if someone were to recreate the angles… maybe with a flash camera. If anyone is willing to, or has the means to do this (safely), this will either prove the shot came where the FBI said it came from, or it will prove there was a second shooter, in the direction of the mirrored angle.

MJTruthUltra

10,665,164 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin
8:57

BREAKING DOWN the FACTS and ODD occurrences about the Charlie Kirk assassination. - Why does NOBODY seem to help or attend to Charlie's wound and WHY does NOBODY have any BLOOD on their hands? Why aren't they packing the wound? - There is NO WAY it was a .30-06 or a SOFT-TIP .30-06 round. NONE of that would even matter with the amount of power and FPS behind a .30-06 round. A soft-tip round would actually create an even bigger EXIT WOUND than a standard FMJ (Full Metal Jacket) round. BUT... We DIDN'T even get an EXIT WOUND at all, unless the hole we see is the exit wound. Even at a 9 degree angle, shooting from the roof position, a .30-06 would of 100% went RIGHT THROUGH Charlie's neck. Maybe even worse. There is NO WAY the bullet would deflect and go STRAIGHT DOWN after hitting his spine or neck bones. It would of CONTINUED DIRECTLY THROUGH. - Where is the RIFLE in the pictures of him on the steps? There is no visible RIFLE in his pant legs, and it WOULD not fit in that backpack especial with the barrel being 2 ft long itself even broken down, and especially the stock/butt of the gun and the scope fit into a pair of skinny jeans. HOW did Tyler get the RIFLE ON THE ROOF? - Why don't we have more footage, ESPECIALLY of when he took the shot or just with the RIFLE in his hands at ANY POINT? Why does the video start with him running? Nothing makes sense and now with all the new footage of Tyler at the gas station and all these other places and an alleged WOMAN that was seen with the shooter, it makes even less sense, with even more questions. cc: Alex Jones, Owen Benjamin

The SCIF

17,884 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Is this the SNIPER'S NEST and the real SUSPECT that shot Charlie? You have to watch this breakdown. The INTEL in this video is extremely important and explains A LOT of things that logically puts the puzzle pieces together. - Ex-Military gentleman named NORMAN goes through finding: - The alleged SNIPER suspect - The SNIPER'S SHOOTING POSITION - EXPLAINS the GUN SHOT FLASH REFLECTION that was caught in the window that was seen on video that's perfectly TIMED with the GUN SHOT that hit Charlie. - Shows and explains the alleged SNIPER'S LASER BEAM which was caught on one of Charlie's SECURITY GUARDS phones' reflection right after the shot. - Also EXPLAINS and SHOWS on video how and where the alleged SNIPER left the crime scene and the path he took. It all is VERY COMPELLING. There are MANY things in this video that make a lot of sense. I'm not concluding this is what happened exactly because we might and probably are looking for 2 shooters. The intel in this video makes a lot of sense and solves a lot of the puzzle for the SNIPER'S alleged position and especially how we see that reflection in the window by the reflective wall capturing the gun shot and it lining up with the reflection on the window is very logical in my opinion. The timing of that flash with the timing of the sound of the gun shot is just too perfect to ignore and the ALLEGED SNIPER'S NEST lines up perfectly. This is SPECULATION, but I will tell you that this, I believe, is on the right path. Please watch the FULL VIDEO to understand the full context of this video. Thought's and comments below. cc: Norman, Project Constitution
21:37

Is this the SNIPER'S NEST and the real SUSPECT that shot Charlie? You have to watch this breakdown. The INTEL in this video is extremely important and explains A LOT of things that logically puts the puzzle pieces together. - Ex-Military gentleman named NORMAN goes through finding: - The alleged SNIPER suspect - The SNIPER'S SHOOTING POSITION - EXPLAINS the GUN SHOT FLASH REFLECTION that was caught in the window that was seen on video that's perfectly TIMED with the GUN SHOT that hit Charlie. - Shows and explains the alleged SNIPER'S LASER BEAM which was caught on one of Charlie's SECURITY GUARDS phones' reflection right after the shot. - Also EXPLAINS and SHOWS on video how and where the alleged SNIPER left the crime scene and the path he took. It all is VERY COMPELLING. There are MANY things in this video that make a lot of sense. I'm not concluding this is what happened exactly because we might and probably are looking for 2 shooters. The intel in this video makes a lot of sense and solves a lot of the puzzle for the SNIPER'S alleged position and especially how we see that reflection in the window by the reflective wall capturing the gun shot and it lining up with the reflection on the window is very logical in my opinion. The timing of that flash with the timing of the sound of the gun shot is just too perfect to ignore and the ALLEGED SNIPER'S NEST lines up perfectly. This is SPECULATION, but I will tell you that this, I believe, is on the right path. Please watch the FULL VIDEO to understand the full context of this video. Thought's and comments below. cc: Norman, Project Constitution

The SCIF

41,502 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Why is there such a UNIQUE INTEREST in the WOODBURY building? Who really is GEORGE ZINN, and HUNTER KOZAK, and why did Charlie really turn down $150 MILLION? Remember the gentleman who was arrested that was dressed in scrubs with a doctor's coat on went directly to the WOODBURY building and crossed the crime scene barrier before he was detained. Police are now seen on top of the building possibly discussing numerous locations for a second shooter. Kash Patel did mention that they have not ruled out this possibility yet. Another person who contacted Candace Owens said that there was more footage, or a longer version that was NOT shown to the public which showed the shooter was with a women at one point. Who is this so called women and where was the alleged shooter seen with this woman? George Zinn is now confirmed to have been at way more events and incidents in history than we previously knew before which points in the direction and an obvious connection to intelligence, whether foreign or domestic. Utah Valley University also has connections to the CIA which ran programs for college students for recruitment purposes. Hunter Kozak who was the last person to ask Charlie Kirk a question who is seen in the video with his armed crossed while everyone else is cheering for Charlie also has some very interesting connections to groups that specifically stalk and disrupt TPUSA events with connections to the streamer named "Destiny" and his "Unfu*k America Tour." Strangely, Hunter Kozak is part of that group and was featured on CNN and now 60 Minutes. Last but not least, we know for a fact there was a lot of inside drama happening, especially when it comes to Charlie being offered money. $150 MILIION to be exact, which would double their yearly budget of a regular $140 MILLION per year. Allegedly Charlie turned it down because he didn't want to mislead his audience and stood for the truth. These are more interesting data points to take into consideration to the overall big picture. What are your thoughts?
9:50

Why is there such a UNIQUE INTEREST in the WOODBURY building? Who really is GEORGE ZINN, and HUNTER KOZAK, and why did Charlie really turn down $150 MILLION? Remember the gentleman who was arrested that was dressed in scrubs with a doctor's coat on went directly to the WOODBURY building and crossed the crime scene barrier before he was detained. Police are now seen on top of the building possibly discussing numerous locations for a second shooter. Kash Patel did mention that they have not ruled out this possibility yet. Another person who contacted Candace Owens said that there was more footage, or a longer version that was NOT shown to the public which showed the shooter was with a women at one point. Who is this so called women and where was the alleged shooter seen with this woman? George Zinn is now confirmed to have been at way more events and incidents in history than we previously knew before which points in the direction and an obvious connection to intelligence, whether foreign or domestic. Utah Valley University also has connections to the CIA which ran programs for college students for recruitment purposes. Hunter Kozak who was the last person to ask Charlie Kirk a question who is seen in the video with his armed crossed while everyone else is cheering for Charlie also has some very interesting connections to groups that specifically stalk and disrupt TPUSA events with connections to the streamer named "Destiny" and his "Unfu*k America Tour." Strangely, Hunter Kozak is part of that group and was featured on CNN and now 60 Minutes. Last but not least, we know for a fact there was a lot of inside drama happening, especially when it comes to Charlie being offered money. $150 MILIION to be exact, which would double their yearly budget of a regular $140 MILLION per year. Allegedly Charlie turned it down because he didn't want to mislead his audience and stood for the truth. These are more interesting data points to take into consideration to the overall big picture. What are your thoughts?

The SCIF

118,188 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

This is important. Someone in the crowd confessed to the shooting immediately after it happened, despite not having a weapon? Why? Does this mean they were a decoy, and this was a joint operation? They have now apprehended multiple people, yet the shooter is still at large. An eyewitness claims that the shot was fired immediately after someone asked Charlie Kirk about trans violence and that he believes there were several people in on it. Did they wait for this specific question? The FBI and Kash Patel need to get to the bottom of this horrific crime as soon as possible. They cannot be allowed to get away with this.
1:01

This is important. Someone in the crowd confessed to the shooting immediately after it happened, despite not having a weapon? Why? Does this mean they were a decoy, and this was a joint operation? They have now apprehended multiple people, yet the shooter is still at large. An eyewitness claims that the shot was fired immediately after someone asked Charlie Kirk about trans violence and that he believes there were several people in on it. Did they wait for this specific question? The FBI and Kash Patel need to get to the bottom of this horrific crime as soon as possible. They cannot be allowed to get away with this.

Green Lives Matter

713,627 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

Candace Owens goes over all CONFIRMED DATA POINTS in the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation which we have learned, so far. - There were multiple sets of prints found on the alleged murder weapon that was found. - The footage of Tyler Robinson turning himself in is missing. - Surgeon NEVER confirmed or suggested Charlie was shot with a .30-06, had a steel neck. Only suggested that MAYBE a frangible bullet was used. - Lone witness who saw shooter in all black, on roof with black face mask, and a smaller rifle that was on the LOSEE Center Rooftop has not been contacted by lawyers or investigators. The witness is also a firearms instructor. He also claimed the weapon he saw the person on the roof holding was SMALLER like a .223/5.56mm style rifle, "something shorter," than what was found by law enforcement. Stated shooter "looked" like a "PROFESSIONAL." - Bomb Dogs were unable to locate weapon in field that it was discovered in. - Federal Agents directed local officers to the weapon in the field. - K9s were NOT provided with scent of the weapon once it was discovered in order to track down who left it. - Terryl Farnsworth raced to remove the camera that was directly behind Charlie's head. - Federal Agents prevented surgeon from returning to his own operating room with Charlie after he left it. - Federal Agents removed Hospital's security footage. -The vehicle in which Charlie was transported in to Timpanogos hospital was not impounded by law enforcement for an investigation or evidence.
5:30

Candace Owens goes over all CONFIRMED DATA POINTS in the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation which we have learned, so far. - There were multiple sets of prints found on the alleged murder weapon that was found. - The footage of Tyler Robinson turning himself in is missing. - Surgeon NEVER confirmed or suggested Charlie was shot with a .30-06, had a steel neck. Only suggested that MAYBE a frangible bullet was used. - Lone witness who saw shooter in all black, on roof with black face mask, and a smaller rifle that was on the LOSEE Center Rooftop has not been contacted by lawyers or investigators. The witness is also a firearms instructor. He also claimed the weapon he saw the person on the roof holding was SMALLER like a .223/5.56mm style rifle, "something shorter," than what was found by law enforcement. Stated shooter "looked" like a "PROFESSIONAL." - Bomb Dogs were unable to locate weapon in field that it was discovered in. - Federal Agents directed local officers to the weapon in the field. - K9s were NOT provided with scent of the weapon once it was discovered in order to track down who left it. - Terryl Farnsworth raced to remove the camera that was directly behind Charlie's head. - Federal Agents prevented surgeon from returning to his own operating room with Charlie after he left it. - Federal Agents removed Hospital's security footage. -The vehicle in which Charlie was transported in to Timpanogos hospital was not impounded by law enforcement for an investigation or evidence.

The SCIF

37,251 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

In honor of Charlie Kirk: Charlie Kirk was a courageous and believing man who had his finger on the pulse of America’s youth, and who saw where they were going, what they were searching for — the ancient, unchanging Faith of the Church — as indicated in this clip from a recent interview with Tucker Carlson. Although Charlie was not an Orthodox Christian, he strove to confess and defend — as he knew it — the Christian faith and principles. We know that God is merciful and receives into eternity every soul in its best possible time. Charlie regularly publicly confessed words and truths from the Gospel of Christ and this is a witness to Truth and to God. 🎥 Tucker Carlson
0:47

In honor of Charlie Kirk: Charlie Kirk was a courageous and believing man who had his finger on the pulse of America’s youth, and who saw where they were going, what they were searching for — the ancient, unchanging Faith of the Church — as indicated in this clip from a recent interview with Tucker Carlson. Although Charlie was not an Orthodox Christian, he strove to confess and defend — as he knew it — the Christian faith and principles. We know that God is merciful and receives into eternity every soul in its best possible time. Charlie regularly publicly confessed words and truths from the Gospel of Christ and this is a witness to Truth and to God. 🎥 Tucker Carlson

Orthodox Ethos

62,955 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

The most SICKENING thing is how Charlie Kirk's entire show and company moved on like nothing ever even happened. Also, come to find out that Charlie Kirk had a CATHOLIC funeral and was buried in a CATHOLIC cemetery. Strange how they hid this information. Almost like it ruins their narrative and agenda that Charlie didn't just "like the architecture of Catholic churches," and shows that maybe Charlie was about to convert to Catholicism like we were told in the first place, but was then covered up. I will tell you that you first need to understand who these people really are and the control and funding behind them. Charlie started to steer away from what they wanted him to do. Charlie started to notice the TRUTH and the LIES and he started to tell the world. The people funding Charlie's company didn't like that and neither did the people under Charlie who were getting paid. Charlie chose the road of TRUTH, while the others chose not to lose the FUNDING of the DONORS and a plan was made that did not include Charlie, but Charlie owned the company. This was a major problem. Charlie was then eliminated and removed and TPUSA continues the direction that THEY wanted to go. Not CHARLIE'S direction or to push the TRUTH... The direction that the MONEY tells them to go and the agenda and narratives they are told to push. It's time to wake up from your slumber and understand that Charlie was assassinated for telling the truth and calling out the lies and corruption. They couldn't afford to be exposed, so they killed him. It's clear as day. cc: Candace Owens
5:29

The most SICKENING thing is how Charlie Kirk's entire show and company moved on like nothing ever even happened. Also, come to find out that Charlie Kirk had a CATHOLIC funeral and was buried in a CATHOLIC cemetery. Strange how they hid this information. Almost like it ruins their narrative and agenda that Charlie didn't just "like the architecture of Catholic churches," and shows that maybe Charlie was about to convert to Catholicism like we were told in the first place, but was then covered up. I will tell you that you first need to understand who these people really are and the control and funding behind them. Charlie started to steer away from what they wanted him to do. Charlie started to notice the TRUTH and the LIES and he started to tell the world. The people funding Charlie's company didn't like that and neither did the people under Charlie who were getting paid. Charlie chose the road of TRUTH, while the others chose not to lose the FUNDING of the DONORS and a plan was made that did not include Charlie, but Charlie owned the company. This was a major problem. Charlie was then eliminated and removed and TPUSA continues the direction that THEY wanted to go. Not CHARLIE'S direction or to push the TRUTH... The direction that the MONEY tells them to go and the agenda and narratives they are told to push. It's time to wake up from your slumber and understand that Charlie was assassinated for telling the truth and calling out the lies and corruption. They couldn't afford to be exposed, so they killed him. It's clear as day. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

203,389 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Why didn't they let the PARAMEDICS work on Charlie or let them in the SUV to perform emergency treatment on the way to the hospital? They attack Candace so much because they know she's right. You can't be so naive to the obvious deception and lies of this cover up. Why do all these people keep lying to their audience when everything is on video? People, stop believing what people say all the time and look for yourself. Charlie's security is especially suspicious the way they acted up to Charlie being shot and Mikey McCoy's actions. It seems all planned... and staged, like they're acting and obviously covering up a planned assassination. One thing I will say, in my opinion, the way Mickey McCoy acted when Charlie was shot was EXTREMELY odd and to me seemed like he confirmed the hit and Charlie's assassination to the shooter or whoever he was on the phone with. He also conducts himself and talks way different, almost like he is acting in a way, compared to how he acted when Charlie got shot and just walked away. If my friend was shot, I wouldn't just walk away slowly on the phone when gunshots are going off. In my opinion, he knew that was the only shot that was coming, and it was for Charlie. cc: Shadow of Ezra, Project Constitution
9:57

Why didn't they let the PARAMEDICS work on Charlie or let them in the SUV to perform emergency treatment on the way to the hospital? They attack Candace so much because they know she's right. You can't be so naive to the obvious deception and lies of this cover up. Why do all these people keep lying to their audience when everything is on video? People, stop believing what people say all the time and look for yourself. Charlie's security is especially suspicious the way they acted up to Charlie being shot and Mikey McCoy's actions. It seems all planned... and staged, like they're acting and obviously covering up a planned assassination. One thing I will say, in my opinion, the way Mickey McCoy acted when Charlie was shot was EXTREMELY odd and to me seemed like he confirmed the hit and Charlie's assassination to the shooter or whoever he was on the phone with. He also conducts himself and talks way different, almost like he is acting in a way, compared to how he acted when Charlie got shot and just walked away. If my friend was shot, I wouldn't just walk away slowly on the phone when gunshots are going off. In my opinion, he knew that was the only shot that was coming, and it was for Charlie. cc: Shadow of Ezra, Project Constitution

The SCIF

81,934 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten