Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Ex-MAGA Host Calls Out Right-Wing ‘Snowflake’ Hypocrisy—Who’s Really Triggered By Free Speech? Full Story: Engage: Resist: #SnowflakeHypocrisy #ExMAGA #FreeSpeech #RightWingPolitics #DemocracyAtRisk

Joe Walsh

486,196 subscribers

12,117 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Comedy News & Politics #SnowflakeHypocrisy #ExMAGA #FreeSpeech #RightWingPolitics #DemocracyAtRisk

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

6 Comments

The Possum Politic1 year ago

Maybe Justin Eichorn can come talk about TDS... Oh wait...

Christopher James1 year ago

Walsh was NEVER MAGA

Trump-Vance White House1 year ago

The right to free speech is a myth! Congress can't create laws about speech but that doesn't mean that the President can't arrest people for dangerous speech, the the President's exclusive judgment.

Joel Cardwell1 year ago

They really are, aren't they?

Orange Tabby🐯1 year ago

Isn’t it fun watching Joe Walsh get triggered everyday. Stay tuned-heart attack incoming.

Erick Ortiz1 year ago

You were never maga you might have been tea party fraud

Related Videos

We Just Landed in Norway… and Found Out My Last Venue Was SHUT DOWN By The Far Left We arrived in Norway for the official Norwegian release of Manifesto, only to discover that the venue he spoke at last time has been permanently shut down due to threats, pressure, and political targeting. In this on-the-ground conversation, I speak with Christian from Document Media, the publisher bringing Manifesto to Norway, about: • Why the previous venue was abandoned after left-wing extremists exposed the location • How government-funded groups intimidate venues, families, and supporters • What it means to host a free-speech event in modern Europe • The challenges of publishing Tommy’s books, past attempts at censorship, and the story behind Manifesto’s Norwegian translation • How Document Media is positioning itself as Free Media in Norway, not “alternative media” This is the first time Manifesto has been translated and released by an official publisher. Norway is waking up. Europe is watching.

We Just Landed in Norway… and Found Out My Last Venue Was SHUT DOWN By The Far Left We arrived in Norway for the official Norwegian release of Manifesto, only to discover that the venue he spoke at last time has been permanently shut down due to threats, pressure, and political targeting. In this on-the-ground conversation, I speak with Christian from Document Media, the publisher bringing Manifesto to Norway, about: • Why the previous venue was abandoned after left-wing extremists exposed the location • How government-funded groups intimidate venues, families, and supporters • What it means to host a free-speech event in modern Europe • The challenges of publishing Tommy’s books, past attempts at censorship, and the story behind Manifesto’s Norwegian translation • How Document Media is positioning itself as Free Media in Norway, not “alternative media” This is the first time Manifesto has been translated and released by an official publisher. Norway is waking up. Europe is watching.

Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧

151,109 views • 8 months ago

🚨 Canadian living in the US just absolutely TORCHED the left’s favourite slur. A woman named “Canadian Bacon” saw someone call the “far right” a “Yatzee movement” (yes, they can’t even spell it) and went full send: “If you’re gonna call half the country Nazis… say it with your full chest. Don’t hide behind baby spelling.” Then she dropped the receipts: - Who’s actually pushing censorship online? - Who wanted people fired for medical choices? - Who labels disagreement “hate speech” and tries to socially blacklist voters? - Who preaches “tolerance,” “love is love,” “my body my choice,” and “diversity”… until you disagree with them? She listed every authoritarian tactic the left accuses conservatives of — and showed they’re the ones doing it. “You don’t win people over by calling them Nazis. You win them with facts, logic, and treating people like human beings.” Mic drop. This is why the left is losing the culture war. Hypocrisy this obvious is impossible to ignore. Drop a 🤡 if you’re tired of the Nazi card being played every time someone disagrees. #LeftHypocrisy #NaziCard #FreeSpeech #DoubleStandards #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst #CommonSense

🚨 Canadian living in the US just absolutely TORCHED the left’s favourite slur. A woman named “Canadian Bacon” saw someone call the “far right” a “Yatzee movement” (yes, they can’t even spell it) and went full send: “If you’re gonna call half the country Nazis… say it with your full chest. Don’t hide behind baby spelling.” Then she dropped the receipts: - Who’s actually pushing censorship online? - Who wanted people fired for medical choices? - Who labels disagreement “hate speech” and tries to socially blacklist voters? - Who preaches “tolerance,” “love is love,” “my body my choice,” and “diversity”… until you disagree with them? She listed every authoritarian tactic the left accuses conservatives of — and showed they’re the ones doing it. “You don’t win people over by calling them Nazis. You win them with facts, logic, and treating people like human beings.” Mic drop. This is why the left is losing the culture war. Hypocrisy this obvious is impossible to ignore. Drop a 🤡 if you’re tired of the Nazi card being played every time someone disagrees. #LeftHypocrisy #NaziCard #FreeSpeech #DoubleStandards #cdnpoli #CanadaFirst #CommonSense

JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦

18,386 views • 3 months ago

🚨 HYPOCRISY EXPOSED: Lionel Nation CALLS OUT the Right's Circular Firing Squad Aiming Straight at Candace Owens— Attacking Her Today Means THEY'RE Coming for YOU Tomorrow Lionel goes nuclear on the hypocrisy exploding across the RIGHT. "My friend, I cannot believe what I'm seeing unfold right now..." The same people who built their brands screaming about free speech, who wore deplatforming like a badge of honor, who begged us to defend their right to say wild sh*t... Are now lining up in a circular firing squad to silence, exile, and erase Candace Owens. Not the left. Not the usual enemies. The "free speech warriors" on our side. They're not debating her. They're not correcting her. They're demanding she shut up, disappear, or worse. Lionel: "You put people in danger when you come after them like that. There's a bounty on her head – figuratively, and in some cases explicitly." And for what? Because she crossed "the line"? Because she's too powerful? Too independent? Because she built a direct pipeline to millions without asking permission from the gatekeepers? "She's to digital media what Elon is to rocketry. She disrupted the entire model – and it's driving them nuts." These aren't critiques. These are character assassinations. Commercial jealousy dressed up as "moral concern." Cable news hates her because one Candace video outperforms their entire week. Legacy influencers hate her because she outpaces institutions built with billions. And the attackers? Many "once respected voices" now whispering (and screaming) for her deplatforming. Lionel warns: You're next. The machine they're feeding doesn't stop at Candace. It won't distinguish allies when you deviate even slightly from the "approved line." If you abandon free speech when it's inconvenient... don't cry when no one defends you later. This isn't about agreeing with Candace. It's about whether dissent is allowed when it's powerful. Lionel: "Free speech isn't about agreement. It's about allowance. It's about trusting truth emerges through conflict, not suppression." He's calling battle stations. Code Red. Watch this full rant – it's one of the most powerful defenses of principle you'll hear in 2025. Go to his YT and SUBSCRIBE please and give his video a like, i'll drop the link in the comments below. 👇 Real free speech absolutists: Stand up now. The masks are off. Choose your side wisely. 🔥

🚨 HYPOCRISY EXPOSED: Lionel Nation CALLS OUT the Right's Circular Firing Squad Aiming Straight at Candace Owens— Attacking Her Today Means THEY'RE Coming for YOU Tomorrow Lionel goes nuclear on the hypocrisy exploding across the RIGHT. "My friend, I cannot believe what I'm seeing unfold right now..." The same people who built their brands screaming about free speech, who wore deplatforming like a badge of honor, who begged us to defend their right to say wild sh*t... Are now lining up in a circular firing squad to silence, exile, and erase Candace Owens. Not the left. Not the usual enemies. The "free speech warriors" on our side. They're not debating her. They're not correcting her. They're demanding she shut up, disappear, or worse. Lionel: "You put people in danger when you come after them like that. There's a bounty on her head – figuratively, and in some cases explicitly." And for what? Because she crossed "the line"? Because she's too powerful? Too independent? Because she built a direct pipeline to millions without asking permission from the gatekeepers? "She's to digital media what Elon is to rocketry. She disrupted the entire model – and it's driving them nuts." These aren't critiques. These are character assassinations. Commercial jealousy dressed up as "moral concern." Cable news hates her because one Candace video outperforms their entire week. Legacy influencers hate her because she outpaces institutions built with billions. And the attackers? Many "once respected voices" now whispering (and screaming) for her deplatforming. Lionel warns: You're next. The machine they're feeding doesn't stop at Candace. It won't distinguish allies when you deviate even slightly from the "approved line." If you abandon free speech when it's inconvenient... don't cry when no one defends you later. This isn't about agreeing with Candace. It's about whether dissent is allowed when it's powerful. Lionel: "Free speech isn't about agreement. It's about allowance. It's about trusting truth emerges through conflict, not suppression." He's calling battle stations. Code Red. Watch this full rant – it's one of the most powerful defenses of principle you'll hear in 2025. Go to his YT and SUBSCRIBE please and give his video a like, i'll drop the link in the comments below. 👇 Real free speech absolutists: Stand up now. The masks are off. Choose your side wisely. 🔥

Project Constitution

1,271,089 views • 8 months ago

🟠 FREE, UNCENSORED, AND ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED 🟠 Karl Stefanovic has spoken, and he isn't going quietly. In his own video update, the now former Today host told his audience he's "free" and "truly independent," thanking them for "21 great years." "Thank you for riding the ups and downs. You have my thanks, and you have all of my love." He made no apology for the interviews that cost him his Nine job. "The public deserve to hear perspectives," he said. "I've spoken to people who have different perspectives. Sometimes I agree with everything a guest says, sometimes I don't, but importantly, you get to make up your mind. You have the right to hear from different voices." "Freedom of speech, here and around the world, is what this show is about," he said. "You don't have to listen to my show. You are smart enough to make up your own mind." He thanked the sponsors who stood by him, the ones "who believe in the freedom of speech that we're talking about," and signalled he is far from finished: "We keep going. Thanks, legends." Read the full story here:

🟠 FREE, UNCENSORED, AND ONLY JUST GETTING STARTED 🟠 Karl Stefanovic has spoken, and he isn't going quietly. In his own video update, the now former Today host told his audience he's "free" and "truly independent," thanking them for "21 great years." "Thank you for riding the ups and downs. You have my thanks, and you have all of my love." He made no apology for the interviews that cost him his Nine job. "The public deserve to hear perspectives," he said. "I've spoken to people who have different perspectives. Sometimes I agree with everything a guest says, sometimes I don't, but importantly, you get to make up your mind. You have the right to hear from different voices." "Freedom of speech, here and around the world, is what this show is about," he said. "You don't have to listen to my show. You are smart enough to make up your own mind." He thanked the sponsors who stood by him, the ones "who believe in the freedom of speech that we're talking about," and signalled he is far from finished: "We keep going. Thanks, legends." Read the full story here:

One News Australia

34,465 views • 2 months ago

Caught a ‘No Kings’ Protester in Dallas Spouting Nonsense About ‘Free Speech’ Here’s Why She’s Missing the Point In Dallas at a “No Kings” protest, I spotted a woman filming Alex Stein and Enrique Tarrio. I asked if she knew them or was a fan. Of course she wasn’t. Then I asked what “No Kings” even means. She replied: “It means we still have free speech and fair elections.” We have those blessings in America because of our Constitution: the First Amendment protects free speech from government tyranny, and our republican system ensures power comes from We the People through secure, citizen-only elections not kings or unchecked bureaucrats. She went on about why she thinks certain people or stations don’t support that. Her heart might be in the right place, but common sense was missing. The SAVE Act would actually safeguard fair elections by requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register and vote in federal elections keeping non-citizens out while protecting the integrity every American deserves. People hate our President so much they’ll twist any story, invent narratives, and smear him relentlessly to fit their agenda. Meanwhile, real threats to our freedoms get ignored. What do you think “No Kings” really stands for? After Hours with Alex Stein #99 Alex Stein #99 Enrique Tarrio WarBoys Studios

Caught a ‘No Kings’ Protester in Dallas Spouting Nonsense About ‘Free Speech’ Here’s Why She’s Missing the Point In Dallas at a “No Kings” protest, I spotted a woman filming Alex Stein and Enrique Tarrio. I asked if she knew them or was a fan. Of course she wasn’t. Then I asked what “No Kings” even means. She replied: “It means we still have free speech and fair elections.” We have those blessings in America because of our Constitution: the First Amendment protects free speech from government tyranny, and our republican system ensures power comes from We the People through secure, citizen-only elections not kings or unchecked bureaucrats. She went on about why she thinks certain people or stations don’t support that. Her heart might be in the right place, but common sense was missing. The SAVE Act would actually safeguard fair elections by requiring documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register and vote in federal elections keeping non-citizens out while protecting the integrity every American deserves. People hate our President so much they’ll twist any story, invent narratives, and smear him relentlessly to fit their agenda. Meanwhile, real threats to our freedoms get ignored. What do you think “No Kings” really stands for? After Hours with Alex Stein #99 Alex Stein #99 Enrique Tarrio WarBoys Studios

Right Side Rebel

55,112 views • 4 months ago

🟠 #BREAKING THE LEFT-WING CIRCUS WAS BACK IN PARLIAMENT TODAY, AND IT TOOK LABOR AND THE GREENS 21 MINUTES TO LIE, DEFLECT AND GASLIGHT 🟠 Pauline Hanson asked the Senate to debate her bill to keep convicted ISIS fighters out of Australia. Katy Gallagher rose to police what she was allowed to say, Murray Watt moved the gag 12 minutes in, and it was done 35 votes to 24 with nothing said about the bill itself. David Shoebridge brought a whistle to the fight and made it about himself, calling One Nation a dog whistle twice and offering the International Criminal Court, which has no say over who gets off a plane in Sydney. Then Labor lied, with Murray Watt telling the Senate it is not giving an ounce of assistance to anyone returning, months after Anthony Albanese admitted his government handed the ISIS brides their passports. The full story has who has done what, where both parties failed, and the five things that could be done right now. Four of them need nothing more than a vote. Watch the video and follow us on Youtube Read the full story here: Don't miss what really happened, our daily newsletter, right in your inbox for FREE, or go paid to support the cause:

🟠 #BREAKING THE LEFT-WING CIRCUS WAS BACK IN PARLIAMENT TODAY, AND IT TOOK LABOR AND THE GREENS 21 MINUTES TO LIE, DEFLECT AND GASLIGHT 🟠 Pauline Hanson asked the Senate to debate her bill to keep convicted ISIS fighters out of Australia. Katy Gallagher rose to police what she was allowed to say, Murray Watt moved the gag 12 minutes in, and it was done 35 votes to 24 with nothing said about the bill itself. David Shoebridge brought a whistle to the fight and made it about himself, calling One Nation a dog whistle twice and offering the International Criminal Court, which has no say over who gets off a plane in Sydney. Then Labor lied, with Murray Watt telling the Senate it is not giving an ounce of assistance to anyone returning, months after Anthony Albanese admitted his government handed the ISIS brides their passports. The full story has who has done what, where both parties failed, and the five things that could be done right now. Four of them need nothing more than a vote. Watch the video and follow us on Youtube Read the full story here: Don't miss what really happened, our daily newsletter, right in your inbox for FREE, or go paid to support the cause:

One News Australia

10,718 views • 21 days ago

🇩🇪 INTERVIEW: “GERMANY CALLED ME A THREAT BECAUSE I QUESTIONED THE MIGRATION CRISIS” , German Commentator & Activist “In 2019, I started speaking out against the mass migration crisis that was started by Angela Merkel. Then I became known as the ‘anti-Greta Thunberg’ because I questioned climate change. My main ‘crime’ was being a young woman who leaned right, which was very unusual at the time. I wasn’t raised conservative. My mother is a single parent who went against traditions. I just believed in freedom and started to see how rare that was in Germany. It’s a very obedient country, almost communist in its mentality. There’s a culture of snitching. If your neighbor doesn’t recycle properly, you can call the authorities. That’s not satire. That’s real life. When I started connecting with the MAGA movement and libertarian thinkers in America, that’s when German intelligence really started to worry. They saw it as a threat that free speech ideas could spread in Europe.”

🇩🇪 INTERVIEW: “GERMANY CALLED ME A THREAT BECAUSE I QUESTIONED THE MIGRATION CRISIS” , German Commentator & Activist “In 2019, I started speaking out against the mass migration crisis that was started by Angela Merkel. Then I became known as the ‘anti-Greta Thunberg’ because I questioned climate change. My main ‘crime’ was being a young woman who leaned right, which was very unusual at the time. I wasn’t raised conservative. My mother is a single parent who went against traditions. I just believed in freedom and started to see how rare that was in Germany. It’s a very obedient country, almost communist in its mentality. There’s a culture of snitching. If your neighbor doesn’t recycle properly, you can call the authorities. That’s not satire. That’s real life. When I started connecting with the MAGA movement and libertarian thinkers in America, that’s when German intelligence really started to worry. They saw it as a threat that free speech ideas could spread in Europe.”

Mario Nawfal

40,086 views • 10 months ago

🇩🇪 INTERVIEW: “GERMANY CALLED ME A THREAT BECAUSE I QUESTIONED THE MIGRATION CRISIS” Naomi Seibt , German Commentator & Activist “In 2019, I started speaking out against the mass migration crisis that was started by Angela Merkel. Then I became known as the ‘anti-Greta Thunberg’ because I questioned climate change. My main ‘crime’ was being a young woman who leaned right, which was very unusual at the time. I wasn’t raised conservative. My mother is a single parent who went against traditions. I just believed in freedom and started to see how rare that was in Germany. It’s a very obedient country, almost communist in its mentality. There’s a culture of snitching. If your neighbor doesn’t recycle properly, you can call the authorities. That’s not satire. That’s real life. When I started connecting with the MAGA movement and libertarian thinkers in America, that’s when German intelligence really started to worry. They saw it as a threat that free speech ideas could spread in Europe.”

🇩🇪 INTERVIEW: “GERMANY CALLED ME A THREAT BECAUSE I QUESTIONED THE MIGRATION CRISIS” Naomi Seibt , German Commentator & Activist “In 2019, I started speaking out against the mass migration crisis that was started by Angela Merkel. Then I became known as the ‘anti-Greta Thunberg’ because I questioned climate change. My main ‘crime’ was being a young woman who leaned right, which was very unusual at the time. I wasn’t raised conservative. My mother is a single parent who went against traditions. I just believed in freedom and started to see how rare that was in Germany. It’s a very obedient country, almost communist in its mentality. There’s a culture of snitching. If your neighbor doesn’t recycle properly, you can call the authorities. That’s not satire. That’s real life. When I started connecting with the MAGA movement and libertarian thinkers in America, that’s when German intelligence really started to worry. They saw it as a threat that free speech ideas could spread in Europe.”

Mario Nawfal

42,590 views • 10 months ago

I'd like to end this Parliamentary sitting by sharing a story because it turns out that it's not only One Nation fighting to defend free speech in Australia. There are fighters for this most important democratic right everywhere. One of these great Australians is a 14-year-old young man named Liam, and hist story is a lesson for the members of this parliament. It was about three months ago, in a Year 9 classroom in Queensland, that an assignment was given to students: nominate your personal hero, write a speech about them, and deliver a speech to the class. Our intrepid young speechwriter began his assignment by nominating me as his hero. Liam's teacher immediately told him he couldn't do that as I was a figure that was 'too controversial'. Believe me when I tell you that this is not the first time this has happened in an educational setting. The teacher then suggested a number of other public figures, none of whom Liam considered to be his personal hero. Liam decided that he'd go ahead anyway and write a speech about Senator Pauline Hanson. He wrote about me representing forgotten Australians and never giving up. He wrote about my pride in Australia and my patriotism. He wrote about his own pride in Australia and his own patriotism. He wrote about my views on multiculturalism and its impacts on our nation. He wrote about how I put Australia's best interest first. He wrote about my love for my country and how he shared it. He wrote about bringing common sense back to Australia's political system. I think that last point was a very astute observation for a young man at the age of 14. Many politicians have only a very tenuous relationship with common sense. He then delivered this speech to his class. For standing up for himself, Liam got a failing grade and was forced to miss the sports session he always looked forward to at the end of the school week. He spent that session in detention. He was detained for standing up for his right to freely express his views. Over the past few years that has become an all-too-familiar story all over the Western world. That's why Liam wrote to my office to let me know what had happened to him. I was humbled by his description of me, and we should all be humbled by his personal courage. Understandably, I was also outraged at how he was treated. He was a young Australian who defied arbitrary authority to stand up for his right to free speech and his right to express a political opinion. Regardless of his opinion and whether you agree with it or not, he showed great courage and he deserves great respect. He exercised the most important democratic right any of us have and he did so with dignity. I know his parents are very proud of Liam. In fact, his mother wrote to the school to protest his treatment and demand a passing grade for having successfully completed his assignment. She was successful in getting Liam a C-minus. I've since read his speech and I've given it a B-plus. I'd like to have given Liam an A, but I strongly believe we should always give our young people something to strive for. It has been my privilege to host Liam as my guest in Parliament House today. It has been my privilege because Liam stood up for a democratic right I have championed since I first came to this place 28 years ago. Liam's story is a reminder that freedom of speech is a fundamental right that we must always protect, because there will always be those who try to take it away from us. Liam's bravery is an example we can all follow. It is Liam who is the real hero of this story. I say to teachers out there: How dare you criticise someone who chooses me or anyone else, as their hero? That is their choice. You asked them to do it, and yet you want to strip them of that right to choose who they want because, in your political opinion, I am too controversial. That's not what should be taught to our kids. Critical thinking should be taught, a way of thinking to encourage. But our teachers today are forcing their own political opinions on young students coming through the system. Is that really what we want? I don't think so. That's not the Australia that many people have fought and died for, for our right to freedom of speech and right to an opinion. So he is a hero to all Australians who believe in the right to freedom of speech and to all Australians who stand to defend it. And do you know what, Liam? You are my personal hero. Thank you.

I'd like to end this Parliamentary sitting by sharing a story because it turns out that it's not only One Nation fighting to defend free speech in Australia. There are fighters for this most important democratic right everywhere. One of these great Australians is a 14-year-old young man named Liam, and hist story is a lesson for the members of this parliament. It was about three months ago, in a Year 9 classroom in Queensland, that an assignment was given to students: nominate your personal hero, write a speech about them, and deliver a speech to the class. Our intrepid young speechwriter began his assignment by nominating me as his hero. Liam's teacher immediately told him he couldn't do that as I was a figure that was 'too controversial'. Believe me when I tell you that this is not the first time this has happened in an educational setting. The teacher then suggested a number of other public figures, none of whom Liam considered to be his personal hero. Liam decided that he'd go ahead anyway and write a speech about Senator Pauline Hanson. He wrote about me representing forgotten Australians and never giving up. He wrote about my pride in Australia and my patriotism. He wrote about his own pride in Australia and his own patriotism. He wrote about my views on multiculturalism and its impacts on our nation. He wrote about how I put Australia's best interest first. He wrote about my love for my country and how he shared it. He wrote about bringing common sense back to Australia's political system. I think that last point was a very astute observation for a young man at the age of 14. Many politicians have only a very tenuous relationship with common sense. He then delivered this speech to his class. For standing up for himself, Liam got a failing grade and was forced to miss the sports session he always looked forward to at the end of the school week. He spent that session in detention. He was detained for standing up for his right to freely express his views. Over the past few years that has become an all-too-familiar story all over the Western world. That's why Liam wrote to my office to let me know what had happened to him. I was humbled by his description of me, and we should all be humbled by his personal courage. Understandably, I was also outraged at how he was treated. He was a young Australian who defied arbitrary authority to stand up for his right to free speech and his right to express a political opinion. Regardless of his opinion and whether you agree with it or not, he showed great courage and he deserves great respect. He exercised the most important democratic right any of us have and he did so with dignity. I know his parents are very proud of Liam. In fact, his mother wrote to the school to protest his treatment and demand a passing grade for having successfully completed his assignment. She was successful in getting Liam a C-minus. I've since read his speech and I've given it a B-plus. I'd like to have given Liam an A, but I strongly believe we should always give our young people something to strive for. It has been my privilege to host Liam as my guest in Parliament House today. It has been my privilege because Liam stood up for a democratic right I have championed since I first came to this place 28 years ago. Liam's story is a reminder that freedom of speech is a fundamental right that we must always protect, because there will always be those who try to take it away from us. Liam's bravery is an example we can all follow. It is Liam who is the real hero of this story. I say to teachers out there: How dare you criticise someone who chooses me or anyone else, as their hero? That is their choice. You asked them to do it, and yet you want to strip them of that right to choose who they want because, in your political opinion, I am too controversial. That's not what should be taught to our kids. Critical thinking should be taught, a way of thinking to encourage. But our teachers today are forcing their own political opinions on young students coming through the system. Is that really what we want? I don't think so. That's not the Australia that many people have fought and died for, for our right to freedom of speech and right to an opinion. So he is a hero to all Australians who believe in the right to freedom of speech and to all Australians who stand to defend it. And do you know what, Liam? You are my personal hero. Thank you.

Pauline Hanson 🇦🇺

104,726 views • 1 year ago

Tucker UNLEASHES on AG Pam Bondi with a blistering 3-minute rebuttal to her remarks on “hate speech.” The monologue version of Tucker is back. This is EXACTLY what we need from him right now. “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech. This is the Attorney General of the United States, the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, telling you that there is this other category called hate speech. And of course, the implication is that’s a crime. There’s almost no sentence that Charlie Kirk. “And I, I’m not running the risk of appropriating his memory for my own ends by saying this. It’s provable. There’s no sentence that Charlie Kirk would have objected to more than that. And you’ve got to think the Attorney General didn’t think it through and was not attempting to desecrate the memory of the person she was purporting to celebrate that she just threw that out there, that she hadn’t thought about it. “You hope that. You hope that Charlie Kirk’s death won’t be used by a group we now call bad actors to create a society that was the opposite of the one he worked to build. You hope that. “You hope that a year from now, the turmoil we’re seeing in the aftermath of his murder won’t be leveraged to bring hate speech laws to this country. And trust me, if it is, if that does happen. There is never a more justified moment for civil disobedience than that, ever. “And there never will be. Because if they can tell you what to say, they’re telling you what to think. There is nothing they can’t do to you because they don’t consider you human. They don’t believe you have a soul. A human being with a soul. A free man has a right to say what he believes, not to hurt other people, but to express human his views. “And by the way, that thinking, and not to pile on the Attorney General, who’s a very nice person, but that thinking that she just articulated on camera there is exactly what got us to a place where some huge and horrifying percentage of young people think it’s okay to shoot people you disagree with to kill Nazis for saying things they don’t like. “Why do they believe that? How did we get here? Is it the video games? Is it the SSRIs? Yeah, probably. But what it really is is 12 and then 16 years of indoctrination in our schools at the hands of people who tell them that, who say exactly what the Attorney General just said. “Well, there’s free speech, which of course, we all acknowledge is important, so, so important. But then there’s this thing called hate speech. Hate speech, of course, is any speech that the people in power hate. But they don’t define it that way. They define it as speech that hurts people, speech that is tantamount to violence. And we punish violence, don’t we? “Of course we do. They’ve been taught that every year of their lives. And so naturally, most of them believe it. When Charlie Kirk is shot in the throat with a .36 on camera. I doubt very many young Americans want to see something like that or actually applaud the death of a man, a father, a husband. “But they’ve been told for their entire lives in schools exactly what Pam Bondi just told them. Well, there’s free speech, but then there’s also hate speech. And woe to those who engage in it because it’s a crime.”

Tucker UNLEASHES on AG Pam Bondi with a blistering 3-minute rebuttal to her remarks on “hate speech.” The monologue version of Tucker is back. This is EXACTLY what we need from him right now. “There’s free speech and then there’s hate speech. This is the Attorney General of the United States, the chief law enforcement officer of the United States, telling you that there is this other category called hate speech. And of course, the implication is that’s a crime. There’s almost no sentence that Charlie Kirk. “And I, I’m not running the risk of appropriating his memory for my own ends by saying this. It’s provable. There’s no sentence that Charlie Kirk would have objected to more than that. And you’ve got to think the Attorney General didn’t think it through and was not attempting to desecrate the memory of the person she was purporting to celebrate that she just threw that out there, that she hadn’t thought about it. “You hope that. You hope that Charlie Kirk’s death won’t be used by a group we now call bad actors to create a society that was the opposite of the one he worked to build. You hope that. “You hope that a year from now, the turmoil we’re seeing in the aftermath of his murder won’t be leveraged to bring hate speech laws to this country. And trust me, if it is, if that does happen. There is never a more justified moment for civil disobedience than that, ever. “And there never will be. Because if they can tell you what to say, they’re telling you what to think. There is nothing they can’t do to you because they don’t consider you human. They don’t believe you have a soul. A human being with a soul. A free man has a right to say what he believes, not to hurt other people, but to express human his views. “And by the way, that thinking, and not to pile on the Attorney General, who’s a very nice person, but that thinking that she just articulated on camera there is exactly what got us to a place where some huge and horrifying percentage of young people think it’s okay to shoot people you disagree with to kill Nazis for saying things they don’t like. “Why do they believe that? How did we get here? Is it the video games? Is it the SSRIs? Yeah, probably. But what it really is is 12 and then 16 years of indoctrination in our schools at the hands of people who tell them that, who say exactly what the Attorney General just said. “Well, there’s free speech, which of course, we all acknowledge is important, so, so important. But then there’s this thing called hate speech. Hate speech, of course, is any speech that the people in power hate. But they don’t define it that way. They define it as speech that hurts people, speech that is tantamount to violence. And we punish violence, don’t we? “Of course we do. They’ve been taught that every year of their lives. And so naturally, most of them believe it. When Charlie Kirk is shot in the throat with a .36 on camera. I doubt very many young Americans want to see something like that or actually applaud the death of a man, a father, a husband. “But they’ve been told for their entire lives in schools exactly what Pam Bondi just told them. Well, there’s free speech, but then there’s also hate speech. And woe to those who engage in it because it’s a crime.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

262,918 views • 11 months ago

Enough of the hypocrisy! 🚫 The so-called ‘Rationalist’ who targets faiths and leaders is now deleting evidence after getting exposed. I have the full, unedited proof of the hate speech and the threats made against Swami Radha Manohar Das and others. If you are brave enough to threaten and abuse public figures on camera, you should be brave enough to face the consequences. I’m challenging you: Let’s meet at the police station. Let’s both file complaints, and if I’m wrong, I’m ready to face the law. But wait, we’ll be cellmates! I have a lot to discuss with you behind bars. ⚖️ The mask of ‘Rationality’ is off—now it’s time for accountability. Proof is in my hands. The law is equal for everyone, including those hiding behind the ‘Rationalist’ tag. Stay tuned for the truth.” #exposed #lawandorder #t_d_rakesh_sharma #stophatespeech #sanatanadharma ప్రశ్న Disclaimer: This video is published in the interest of public safety and transparency, in accordance with the right to free speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The content is based on verified public record evidence and is intended to highlight hate speech and public threats directed at individuals/communities. This does not incite violence but calls for legal accountability and proper investigation by authorities. The creator does not promote any unlawful activities and is ready to cooperate with law enforcement agencies regarding the evidence presented. radhamanohardas

Enough of the hypocrisy! 🚫 The so-called ‘Rationalist’ who targets faiths and leaders is now deleting evidence after getting exposed. I have the full, unedited proof of the hate speech and the threats made against Swami Radha Manohar Das and others. If you are brave enough to threaten and abuse public figures on camera, you should be brave enough to face the consequences. I’m challenging you: Let’s meet at the police station. Let’s both file complaints, and if I’m wrong, I’m ready to face the law. But wait, we’ll be cellmates! I have a lot to discuss with you behind bars. ⚖️ The mask of ‘Rationality’ is off—now it’s time for accountability. Proof is in my hands. The law is equal for everyone, including those hiding behind the ‘Rationalist’ tag. Stay tuned for the truth.” #exposed #lawandorder #t_d_rakesh_sharma #stophatespeech #sanatanadharma ప్రశ్న Disclaimer: This video is published in the interest of public safety and transparency, in accordance with the right to free speech under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The content is based on verified public record evidence and is intended to highlight hate speech and public threats directed at individuals/communities. This does not incite violence but calls for legal accountability and proper investigation by authorities. The creator does not promote any unlawful activities and is ready to cooperate with law enforcement agencies regarding the evidence presented. radhamanohardas

Krishna..⚡....⚡

17,028 views • 2 months ago

🔴 SYDNEY STUDENTS CAUGHT ON CAMERA CALLING FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST PAULINE HANSON 🔴 Footage published by One Nation shows high schoolers at the anti Hanson protest at Sydney Town Hall recorded saying "kill her" and "slap the shit out of that f@#ken bit#h" about Pauline Hanson. In the clip a teenager admits on camera that calling for political violence was "definitely ironic", after advocating for a guillotine. The exchange exposes how truancy is being encouraged while political indoctrination replaces genuine critical thinking. The fault lies not with the children, but with an education system that enables classroom truancy and replaces genuine debate with partisan activism. Video: One Nation Australia Read the full story and watch the videos 🎥 here: Don't miss what really happened, our daily newsletter, right in your inbox for FREE, or go paid to support the cause:

🔴 SYDNEY STUDENTS CAUGHT ON CAMERA CALLING FOR VIOLENCE AGAINST PAULINE HANSON 🔴 Footage published by One Nation shows high schoolers at the anti Hanson protest at Sydney Town Hall recorded saying "kill her" and "slap the shit out of that f@#ken bit#h" about Pauline Hanson. In the clip a teenager admits on camera that calling for political violence was "definitely ironic", after advocating for a guillotine. The exchange exposes how truancy is being encouraged while political indoctrination replaces genuine critical thinking. The fault lies not with the children, but with an education system that enables classroom truancy and replaces genuine debate with partisan activism. Video: One Nation Australia Read the full story and watch the videos 🎥 here: Don't miss what really happened, our daily newsletter, right in your inbox for FREE, or go paid to support the cause:

One News Australia

25,291 views • 18 days ago

Angus: Donald Trump is furious that he was made to look like an absolute buffoon in Davos, and that the revenge was coming fast and quick. And what do you do the next day? You start raising the issue of breaking Canada apart. This is the Donbass playbook. Exactly. This has been in the works for some time. The Alberta separatists—these are not credible people. One of them is an ex-Marine. I mean, can you say astroturf? But what they’ve been doing is meeting in Washington. You know, Pete Hoekstra, the ambassador to Canada, accused us of foreign interference by showing a commercial of Ronald Reagan. Meanwhile, the Alberta separatists claim there’s a $500 million slush fund on the table for them to help break up Canada. This is the play they’re going to be using against us. We have an extremist premier, Danielle Smith, who’s been undermining Canada again and again. I just came back from Alberta—huge rallies in Calgary and Edmonton. People do not want this. But what they understand is it doesn’t matter what the majority thinks right now. What matters is Donald Trump’s ability to create an impression so that he has an excuse, a provocation, to act. That’s the Vladimir Putin playbook. These are really, really dangerous times. Ben, we have to start calling this out. We have to shine a light on this. And unfortunately, our national media are being led by the nose on this. This is not a credible rallying of independence. This is about subservience to the MAGA agenda, and Canadians need to recognize the threat that’s coming at us right now.

Angus: Donald Trump is furious that he was made to look like an absolute buffoon in Davos, and that the revenge was coming fast and quick. And what do you do the next day? You start raising the issue of breaking Canada apart. This is the Donbass playbook. Exactly. This has been in the works for some time. The Alberta separatists—these are not credible people. One of them is an ex-Marine. I mean, can you say astroturf? But what they’ve been doing is meeting in Washington. You know, Pete Hoekstra, the ambassador to Canada, accused us of foreign interference by showing a commercial of Ronald Reagan. Meanwhile, the Alberta separatists claim there’s a $500 million slush fund on the table for them to help break up Canada. This is the play they’re going to be using against us. We have an extremist premier, Danielle Smith, who’s been undermining Canada again and again. I just came back from Alberta—huge rallies in Calgary and Edmonton. People do not want this. But what they understand is it doesn’t matter what the majority thinks right now. What matters is Donald Trump’s ability to create an impression so that he has an excuse, a provocation, to act. That’s the Vladimir Putin playbook. These are really, really dangerous times. Ben, we have to start calling this out. We have to shine a light on this. And unfortunately, our national media are being led by the nose on this. This is not a credible rallying of independence. This is about subservience to the MAGA agenda, and Canadians need to recognize the threat that’s coming at us right now.

Acyn

635,025 views • 7 months ago

We’re launching a campus organization, inspired by Charlie Kirk! A few months before Charlie Kirk was shot dead on a university campus, I had a long conversation with him — almost an hour. He was worried about Canadian universities. The cancel culture. The silencing of conservative students. The indoctrination factories he had spent his entire career fighting south of the border. He had seen it up close, and he asked me: were we going to fight back? I told him yes. Then, on September 10, 2025, a politically motivated sniper climbed onto a rooftop at Utah Valley University and put a bullet in Charlie Kirk’s neck while he was doing exactly what he always did — standing up for free speech on a university campus. I’ve thought about that conversation a lot since then. Because Charlie understood something that too many people on our side still refuse to face: the university campus isn’t just where young people go to get degrees. It’s where the woke mob is manufactured. It’s where the cancel culture foot soldiers are recruited, trained, and radicalised — before being sent out into the world to tear down everything we hold dear. We’ve made real gains. Independent media is getting stronger. We win (sometimes) in the courts. And the battle for free speech has new allies, like Elon Musk and his social media platform, X. But the woke machine at our universities is still running at full capacity. You know the stories: Lindsay Shepherd was a 22-year-old teaching assistant at Wilfrid Laurier University. She showed a short video clip of Jordan Peterson in class — as part of a lecture on a controversial topic. Her professors hauled her into an interrogation and compared her to a Nazi showing propaganda films. This past January, Conservative MP Garnett Genuis was refused permission to hold an event at York University. A sitting Member of Parliament — barred from speaking to students. Those are just the stories that got coverage. Every day, thousands of our students sit down, stay quiet, and self-censor — terrified of being destroyed by the mob before their careers have even started. And nobody is fighting for them. If we don’t fight at the source — inside the lecture halls and student unions where the actual indoctrination happens — we’re only ever chopping heads off a hydra. It will keep growing new ones. And right now, on Canadian campuses, our side has nobody. The Conservative Party’s campus clubs are too nervous to stick their necks out for anyone — they don’t want to risk their political careers. No think tank is focused on campuses. The faith communities, the advocacy organizations — all doing important work, but few of them are walking through the doors of our universities. That is why The Democracy Fund (The Democracy Fund) is launching Canadian Students for Free Speech — a TDF-led national network that will establish student-led, officially recognized free speech clubs on every post-secondary campus in Canada. If you care about free speech, if you want to support conservative and freedom-oriented students on Canada’s university campuses, learn more about Canadian Students for Free Speech and donate to help build it. Here is the plan. The Democracy Fund is recruiting students with backbone, and we will train them in campus organising and free speech philosophy. We will coach them step by step through the process of getting their clubs officially recognised by their universities — and trust me, that battle alone will be worth documenting and publishing. We will equip them with professionally printed posters, pamphlets, and proven messaging to promote free speech. Canadian Students for Free Speech will bring speakers directly to those campuses: Tamara Lich, and other freedom fighters who’ve been through the fire. Debates, town halls, and meet-and-greets that give conservative and freedom-loving students a reason to come together and realise they are not alone. Canadian Students for Free Speech will train every club member to document every act of censorship — and we will publish every story. And when the administration comes after them — and they will come after them — Canadian Students for Free Speech will show up with cameras, journalists, and The Democracy Fund’s lawyers. Our students will not face the mob alone. To do this properly, The Democracy Fund is hiring a full-time National Campus Coordinator. This is a real, demanding job. This person will travel coast to coast — from UBC to Dalhousie — recruiting student leaders, running training weekends, coordinating speaker tours, managing club applications, and fielding that call at midnight when a dean suddenly decides to cancel a student event. They will be the spine of the entire operation. Beyond the salary, there are real costs to account for: printed materials for clubs at dozens of campuses, travel expenses for our speakers, legal fees when universities try to block or deregister our clubs, and the infrastructure to run a national student network. This is not a small project. But then again, losing an entire generation to indoctrination is no small matter. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

We’re launching a campus organization, inspired by Charlie Kirk! A few months before Charlie Kirk was shot dead on a university campus, I had a long conversation with him — almost an hour. He was worried about Canadian universities. The cancel culture. The silencing of conservative students. The indoctrination factories he had spent his entire career fighting south of the border. He had seen it up close, and he asked me: were we going to fight back? I told him yes. Then, on September 10, 2025, a politically motivated sniper climbed onto a rooftop at Utah Valley University and put a bullet in Charlie Kirk’s neck while he was doing exactly what he always did — standing up for free speech on a university campus. I’ve thought about that conversation a lot since then. Because Charlie understood something that too many people on our side still refuse to face: the university campus isn’t just where young people go to get degrees. It’s where the woke mob is manufactured. It’s where the cancel culture foot soldiers are recruited, trained, and radicalised — before being sent out into the world to tear down everything we hold dear. We’ve made real gains. Independent media is getting stronger. We win (sometimes) in the courts. And the battle for free speech has new allies, like Elon Musk and his social media platform, X. But the woke machine at our universities is still running at full capacity. You know the stories: Lindsay Shepherd was a 22-year-old teaching assistant at Wilfrid Laurier University. She showed a short video clip of Jordan Peterson in class — as part of a lecture on a controversial topic. Her professors hauled her into an interrogation and compared her to a Nazi showing propaganda films. This past January, Conservative MP Garnett Genuis was refused permission to hold an event at York University. A sitting Member of Parliament — barred from speaking to students. Those are just the stories that got coverage. Every day, thousands of our students sit down, stay quiet, and self-censor — terrified of being destroyed by the mob before their careers have even started. And nobody is fighting for them. If we don’t fight at the source — inside the lecture halls and student unions where the actual indoctrination happens — we’re only ever chopping heads off a hydra. It will keep growing new ones. And right now, on Canadian campuses, our side has nobody. The Conservative Party’s campus clubs are too nervous to stick their necks out for anyone — they don’t want to risk their political careers. No think tank is focused on campuses. The faith communities, the advocacy organizations — all doing important work, but few of them are walking through the doors of our universities. That is why The Democracy Fund (The Democracy Fund) is launching Canadian Students for Free Speech — a TDF-led national network that will establish student-led, officially recognized free speech clubs on every post-secondary campus in Canada. If you care about free speech, if you want to support conservative and freedom-oriented students on Canada’s university campuses, learn more about Canadian Students for Free Speech and donate to help build it. Here is the plan. The Democracy Fund is recruiting students with backbone, and we will train them in campus organising and free speech philosophy. We will coach them step by step through the process of getting their clubs officially recognised by their universities — and trust me, that battle alone will be worth documenting and publishing. We will equip them with professionally printed posters, pamphlets, and proven messaging to promote free speech. Canadian Students for Free Speech will bring speakers directly to those campuses: Tamara Lich, and other freedom fighters who’ve been through the fire. Debates, town halls, and meet-and-greets that give conservative and freedom-loving students a reason to come together and realise they are not alone. Canadian Students for Free Speech will train every club member to document every act of censorship — and we will publish every story. And when the administration comes after them — and they will come after them — Canadian Students for Free Speech will show up with cameras, journalists, and The Democracy Fund’s lawyers. Our students will not face the mob alone. To do this properly, The Democracy Fund is hiring a full-time National Campus Coordinator. This is a real, demanding job. This person will travel coast to coast — from UBC to Dalhousie — recruiting student leaders, running training weekends, coordinating speaker tours, managing club applications, and fielding that call at midnight when a dean suddenly decides to cancel a student event. They will be the spine of the entire operation. Beyond the salary, there are real costs to account for: printed materials for clubs at dozens of campuses, travel expenses for our speakers, legal fees when universities try to block or deregister our clubs, and the infrastructure to run a national student network. This is not a small project. But then again, losing an entire generation to indoctrination is no small matter. REPORT by Ezra Levant 🍁🚛:

Rebel News

28,042 views • 1 month ago

If this person is telling the truth about who Charlie Kirk was in high school, then we understand his origin story: 1/ Bully 2/ Mediocre 3/ Victim mentality 4/ Racist, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic The Right wing is a grievance industry for mediocre whites incapable of or unwilling to compete with other racial/ethic groups & their own women. And they have no metric for competence due to white supremacy. In their minds, whiteness equals superiority, which explains why Kirk blamed an “imaginary Black” for taking his spot at West Point. As if West Point ever owed him a spot. As if being white & male should’ve assured him a spot at America’s most elite military academy. This would also explain how Kirk ended up at community college instead of Yale, Brown or Harvard. He was average or below average—a reality that he refused to accept. Instead of managing his mediocrity by working harder to improve himself, he cloaked his grievances in politics & fanned the flames of hatred. And it seems that he debated college students not out of a spirit of free speech & open debate, but because he was still nursing hurt feelings from that West Point rejection. He was out to prove to college students that he actually was better, smarter than them. He wasn’t. White fragility is a threat to the nation.

If this person is telling the truth about who Charlie Kirk was in high school, then we understand his origin story: 1/ Bully 2/ Mediocre 3/ Victim mentality 4/ Racist, Islamophobic, anti-Semitic The Right wing is a grievance industry for mediocre whites incapable of or unwilling to compete with other racial/ethic groups & their own women. And they have no metric for competence due to white supremacy. In their minds, whiteness equals superiority, which explains why Kirk blamed an “imaginary Black” for taking his spot at West Point. As if West Point ever owed him a spot. As if being white & male should’ve assured him a spot at America’s most elite military academy. This would also explain how Kirk ended up at community college instead of Yale, Brown or Harvard. He was average or below average—a reality that he refused to accept. Instead of managing his mediocrity by working harder to improve himself, he cloaked his grievances in politics & fanned the flames of hatred. And it seems that he debated college students not out of a spirit of free speech & open debate, but because he was still nursing hurt feelings from that West Point rejection. He was out to prove to college students that he actually was better, smarter than them. He wasn’t. White fragility is a threat to the nation.

Yvette Carnell 🇺🇸

42,034 views • 11 months ago

Jemma Forte, "So the Daily Mail and the other right wing papers are trying to find anything that they can dirt on the Labour party" "And this is the second time the Daily Mail really featured this very, very heavily. And the story is Angela Raynor sold her council, sorry, bought her council house and apparently might own between one and a half to say, three and a half thousand pounds in capital gains tax when she sold it" "However, this has already been looked at. She's had legal advice saying she's fine. It was looked at by the police once" "But these people are desperate to reopen the case and the hypocrisy is just off the scale because the Daily Mail is owned by Lord Ashcroft, who doesn't pay tax in this country, a non dom. It was millions and millions and millions of pounds offshore a newspaper that avoids paying its taxes tax" "And they're going after a woman who bought her a council house and owes a couple of grand" "Now, if that is so, then obviously labor important members of the Labour party need to be held up to scrutiny. They need to be accountable. That's absolutely fine" "But from a party that is full of millionaires and billionaires and people like Jeremy Hunt, who, for instance, said it was an honest mistake that he didn't pay stamp duty on seven properties, it just. It feels rather grotesque to me" @jemmaforte

Jemma Forte, "So the Daily Mail and the other right wing papers are trying to find anything that they can dirt on the Labour party" "And this is the second time the Daily Mail really featured this very, very heavily. And the story is Angela Raynor sold her council, sorry, bought her council house and apparently might own between one and a half to say, three and a half thousand pounds in capital gains tax when she sold it" "However, this has already been looked at. She's had legal advice saying she's fine. It was looked at by the police once" "But these people are desperate to reopen the case and the hypocrisy is just off the scale because the Daily Mail is owned by Lord Ashcroft, who doesn't pay tax in this country, a non dom. It was millions and millions and millions of pounds offshore a newspaper that avoids paying its taxes tax" "And they're going after a woman who bought her a council house and owes a couple of grand" "Now, if that is so, then obviously labor important members of the Labour party need to be held up to scrutiny. They need to be accountable. That's absolutely fine" "But from a party that is full of millionaires and billionaires and people like Jeremy Hunt, who, for instance, said it was an honest mistake that he didn't pay stamp duty on seven properties, it just. It feels rather grotesque to me" @jemmaforte

Farrukh

775,328 views • 2 years ago

🚨 Georgia Democrat Candidate Wants to Silence MAGA Voters with a 4-Year Internet Ban 🚨 A wild viral clip shows Suzanna Karatassos, a Democrat running for Georgia House District 120, pushing a straight-up authoritarian idea. She says once Trump is out and Democrats grab power again, they should punish anyone who voted for him by banning them from social media and the internet for four full years. In her own words: "When this is all over and Trump is gone and Democrats are back in charge and we're rebuilding everything, the punishment for MAGA for voting Trump three times needs to be that they lose their internet access for four years, that they cannot post videos or comments on social media for four straight years... so that none of us are subjected to their lies and misinformation while we are rebuilding the chaos that they caused." This is classic Democrat hypocrisy and control-freak behavior. They scream about "democracy" and "free speech" when it suits them, but the second they think they can get away with it, they want to shut down half the country for daring to vote against their socialist agenda. No trial, no crime, just pure political revenge against patriots who support Trump and want America First. Karatassos is running in a state primary, and this clip proves exactly why Democrats can't be trusted with power. They dream of censoring conservatives, banning dissent, and punishing voters like communists always do. Georgia patriots need to make sure this radical never gets near a seat in the legislature. Her kind of thinking is dangerous to freedom and everything we stand for. Wake up and vote these tyrants out before they turn the First Amendment into toilet paper.

🚨 Georgia Democrat Candidate Wants to Silence MAGA Voters with a 4-Year Internet Ban 🚨 A wild viral clip shows Suzanna Karatassos, a Democrat running for Georgia House District 120, pushing a straight-up authoritarian idea. She says once Trump is out and Democrats grab power again, they should punish anyone who voted for him by banning them from social media and the internet for four full years. In her own words: "When this is all over and Trump is gone and Democrats are back in charge and we're rebuilding everything, the punishment for MAGA for voting Trump three times needs to be that they lose their internet access for four years, that they cannot post videos or comments on social media for four straight years... so that none of us are subjected to their lies and misinformation while we are rebuilding the chaos that they caused." This is classic Democrat hypocrisy and control-freak behavior. They scream about "democracy" and "free speech" when it suits them, but the second they think they can get away with it, they want to shut down half the country for daring to vote against their socialist agenda. No trial, no crime, just pure political revenge against patriots who support Trump and want America First. Karatassos is running in a state primary, and this clip proves exactly why Democrats can't be trusted with power. They dream of censoring conservatives, banning dissent, and punishing voters like communists always do. Georgia patriots need to make sure this radical never gets near a seat in the legislature. Her kind of thinking is dangerous to freedom and everything we stand for. Wake up and vote these tyrants out before they turn the First Amendment into toilet paper.

Old School Eddie

10,167 views • 6 months ago

Royal Holloway student Brodie Mitchell was confronted by Huda El-Jamal, President of the Friends of Palestine Society, who called him a “wannabe Jew” and questioned why he wasn’t wearing a kippah. Brodie — who describes himself as a “non-Jewish Zionist” — responded by asking why she was wearing a “tea towel” on her head, referring to her keffiyeh. Within 24 hours, Brodie was suspended from campus for nine weeks, locked out of campus, and told to vacate his accommodation. His comment was branded “offensive”, “Islamophobic” and “anti-Palestinian”. He even had to request permission to give his side of the story — against the backdrop of the Government’s new “anti-Muslim hostility” definition. Meanwhile, Ms El-Jamal faced no disciplinary action. This is two-tier policing of speech on campus. The Free Speech Union is supporting Brodie and has lodged a complaint with the Office for Students. He is now back on campus, but under severe restrictions on who he can speak to and what he can say — with expulsion threatened for even minor breaches. He has also received death threats and faced harassment from fellow students. The university is now spending what his barrister calls a “grossly disproportionate and unreasonable” sum in an apparent attempt to force him out of litigation. We are challenging these restrictions and urging the OfS to investigate. Brodie’s case will be heard over three days in the High Court in June, where he will say that he has unfairly been deprived of seven weeks of study time. We have also put the Government on notice of potential judicial review over its “anti-Muslim hostility” definition if they don’t immediately withdraw it and its associated guidance. We will defend the right to criticise any religion and stop the Muslim blasphemy law — but we need your help 👇 Watch Brodie Mitchell on GB News

Royal Holloway student Brodie Mitchell was confronted by Huda El-Jamal, President of the Friends of Palestine Society, who called him a “wannabe Jew” and questioned why he wasn’t wearing a kippah. Brodie — who describes himself as a “non-Jewish Zionist” — responded by asking why she was wearing a “tea towel” on her head, referring to her keffiyeh. Within 24 hours, Brodie was suspended from campus for nine weeks, locked out of campus, and told to vacate his accommodation. His comment was branded “offensive”, “Islamophobic” and “anti-Palestinian”. He even had to request permission to give his side of the story — against the backdrop of the Government’s new “anti-Muslim hostility” definition. Meanwhile, Ms El-Jamal faced no disciplinary action. This is two-tier policing of speech on campus. The Free Speech Union is supporting Brodie and has lodged a complaint with the Office for Students. He is now back on campus, but under severe restrictions on who he can speak to and what he can say — with expulsion threatened for even minor breaches. He has also received death threats and faced harassment from fellow students. The university is now spending what his barrister calls a “grossly disproportionate and unreasonable” sum in an apparent attempt to force him out of litigation. We are challenging these restrictions and urging the OfS to investigate. Brodie’s case will be heard over three days in the High Court in June, where he will say that he has unfairly been deprived of seven weeks of study time. We have also put the Government on notice of potential judicial review over its “anti-Muslim hostility” definition if they don’t immediately withdraw it and its associated guidance. We will defend the right to criticise any religion and stop the Muslim blasphemy law — but we need your help 👇 Watch Brodie Mitchell on GB News

The Free Speech Union

175,630 views • 5 months ago